AzTrials
AzTrials

Ulcerative ColitisPhase 3NCT00326209

Long-Term Safety and Tolerability of Mesalamine Pellets in Participants With Ulcerative Colitis in Remission

A Phase 3 study testing Encapsulated Mesalamine Granules (eMG) in people with Ulcerative Colitis, run by Bausch Health Americas, Inc. at 61 sites in United States.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

To evaluate the long-term safety and tolerability of encapsulated mesalamine Granules (eMG) (formerly referred to as Mesalamine Pellets [MP]) in participants with ulcerative colitis currently in remission. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Ulcerative Colitis
What is being tested?
Encapsulated Mesalamine Granules (eMG)
Type of treatment
Pill or oral medicine
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
393 participants
Where
61 sitesUnited States
Study dates
22 Dec 2005to 5 May 2008
Phase
Phase 3
Are there results?
Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • An Institutional Review Board (IRB)/Ethics Committee (EC) approved informed consent is signed and dated prior to any study-related activities.
  • Participant has successfully participated in a previous MP clinical study per investigator's discretion with successful participation minimally defined as compliant with study-related procedures and study drug dosing schedule in the previous study and did not discontinue from the previous study due to study drug-related AE(s) or if new participants:
  • Participant is a male or,
  • If the participant is female, she is eligible to enter if she is of:
  • Non-childbearing potential (that is; physiologically incapable of becoming pregnant, including any female who has undergone sterilization [hysterectomy or bilateral tubal ligation] or is post-menopausal. For purposes of this study, postmenopausal is defined as 1 year without menses); or childbearing potential, has a negative serum pregnancy test at screen and, if heterosexually active, agrees to one of the following:
  • Double barrier method of contraception, specifically, use of a condom and spermicide, for 1 week prior to study drug administration, throughout the 6-month Treatment Phase, and the 2-week follow-up phase.
Show all 15Show fewer
  • Oral contraceptives administered for at least 2 monthly cycles prior to study drug administration during all 6 months of study drug administration and administered for 1 monthly cycle following completion of the study.
  • An intrauterine device (IUD), inserted by a qualified clinician, with published data showing that the lowest expected failure rate is less than (<)1% per year (not all IUDs meet this criterion).
  • Medroxyprogesterone acetate (DEPO-PROVERA) administered for a minimum of 1 monthly cycle prior to the study drug administration, during all 6 months of study drug administration, and administered for 1 monthly cycle following study completion. Norelgestromin/ ethinyl estradiol transdermal system (Ortho Evra patch) administered for at least 2 monthly cycles prior to study drug administration and administered for 2 monthly cycles following study completion.
  • Partner has undergone vasectomy and participant is in a monogamous relationship.
  • The investigator is responsible for determining whether the participant has adequate birth control for study participation.
  • Participant is greater than or equal to (≥) 18 years of age. c. Participant has historically confirmed diagnosis (physician letter for newly/recently diagnosed and by medical records for previously diagnosed participants) of mild to moderate UC in remission for greater than (>) 1 month and <12 months.
  • Confirmed current remission defined as both: A screening rectal bleeding score of 0 as described in the Disease Activity Index (DAI) (Sutherland Index) where 0 = None A screening sigmoidoscopy score of 0 to 1 for mucosal appearance as described in the (Sutherland Index where 0 = intact mucosa with preserved or distorted vessels and 1 = Erythema, decreased vascular pattern, granularity, no mucosal hemorrhage.
  • Participant and investigator consider there is the potential for benefit to the participant with MP treatment.
  • Participant is capable and willing to comply with all study procedures.

Who cannot join

  • Participant has any condition or circumstance that would, in the opinion of the investigator, prevent completion of the study or interfere with analysis of study results, including history of noncompliance with treatments or visits.
  • If a new participant, the following additional exclusion criteria will apply:
  • Participant has a history of allergy or intolerance to aspirin, mesalamine or other salicylates.
  • Participant has an abnormal clinical lab result which in the opinion of the investigator is significant enough to prevent participant's enrollment in the study.
  • Participant or participant's parents are known to have phenylketonuria.
  • Participant has participated in an investigational drug or device study within the 30 days prior to study screening.
Show all 9Show fewer
  • Participant shows evidence of current excessive alcohol consumption or drug dependence.
  • Participant has uncontrolled, clinically significant renal disease manifested by 1.5 * ULN of serum creatinine or blood urea nitrogen (BUN) levels.
  • Participant has calculated creatinine clearance level of <60 mL/min

Trial locations and contacts

61 sites in 1 country.

61 sites in 1 country

United States61 sites
  • AGMG Clinical Research

    Anaheim, California, 92801

  • Northwest Gastroenterologists S.C.

    Arlington Heights, Illinois, 60005

  • Consultative Gastroenterology

    Atlanta, Georgia, 30308

  • Digestive Care Associates

    Austell, Georgia, 30106

  • Sinai Medical Office Building

    Baltimore, Maryland, 21215

  • Lovelace Scientific Resources

    Beverly Hills, California, 90211

  • Birmingham Gastroenterology Associates

    Birmingham, Alabama, 35209

  • Connecticut Gastroenterology Institute

    Bristol, Connecticut, 06010

  • Clinical Research of Tampa Bay, Inc.

    Brooksville, Florida, 34613

  • Charleston Gastroenterology Specialists, LLC

    Charleston, South Carolina, 29414

  • Gastroenterology Associates of Tidewater

    Chesapeake, Virginia, 23320

  • Research Institute of Michigan, LLC

    Chesterfield, Michigan, 48047

  • New River Research Institute

    Christiansburg, Virginia, 24073

  • Consultants for Clinical Research, Inc.

    Cincinnati, Ohio, 45219

  • Center for Gastroenterology

    Decatur, Georgia, 30033

  • First Care Family Doctors South

    Fayetteville, Arkansas, 72701

  • Digestive Liver Disease Specialists, Medical Group

    Garden Grove, California, 92840

  • LeBauer Research Associates, PA

    Greensboro, North Carolina, 27403

  • Medical Research Unlimited

    Hialeah, Florida, 33013

  • Bethany Medical Center

    High Point, North Carolina, 27262

  • Southern Clinical Research Consultants

    Hollywood, Florida, 33021

  • Philip J. Beam Medical Center

    Hollywood, Maryland, 20636

  • NationsMed Clinical Research

    Houston, Texas, 77034

  • Clinical Trial Network

    Houston, Texas, 77074

  • Houston Digestive Disease Clinic

    Houston, Texas, 77090

  • Little Rock Diagnostic Clinic

    Little Rock, Arkansas, 72205

  • Professionals for Clinical Research

    Littleton, Colorado, 80120

  • Long Beach VA Medical Center

    Long Beach, California, 90822

  • University of Louisville

    Louisville, Kentucky, 40202

  • Gastroenterology Associates of Central Georgia

    Macon, Georgia, 31201

  • Center for Digestive & Liver Diseases

    Mexico, Missouri, 65265

  • Center for Advanced Research

    Milwaukee, Wisconsin, 53215

  • Medical Research Institute

    Nashville, Tennessee, 37205

  • United Medical Research

    New Smyrna Beach, Florida, 32168

  • Simon Lichtiger, M.D.

    New York, New York, 10128

  • Venture Research Institute, LLC

    North Miami Beach, Florida, 33162

  • VA Medical Center, Northport

    Northport, New York, 11768

  • Shore Health Group

    Ocean City, New Jersey, 07712

  • Community Clinical Trials

    Orange, California, 92868

  • Penninsula Research, Inc.

    Ormond Beach, Florida, 32174

  • Advanced Gastroenterology Associates

    Palm Harbor, Florida, 34684

  • Boice-Willis Clinic

    Rocky Mount, North Carolina, 27804

  • Rider Research Group

    San Francisco, California, 94117

  • John Jolley, M.D.

    San Rafael, California, 94901

  • Lovelace Scientific Resources

    Santa Ana, California, 92704

  • Santa Barbara Clinical Research

    Santa Barbara, California, 93108

  • Lovelace Scientific Resources

    Sarasota, Florida, 34233

  • Advent Clinical Research

    Sarasota, Florida, 34239

  • Seattle Gastroenterology Associates

    Seattle, Washington, 98133

  • Hillcrest Clinical Research, LLC

    Simpsonville, South Carolina, 29681

  • Eastern Washington Clinical Research Center

    Spokane, Washington, 99204

  • Spokane Digestive Disease Center

    Spokane, Washington, 99204

  • St. Louis Center for Clinical Research

    St Louis, Missouri, 63128

  • VA Medical Center

    Syracuse, New York, 13210

  • Digestive Disease Research Center

    Tacoma, Washington, 98405

  • Cotton-O'Neil Digestive Health Center

    Topeka, Kansas, 66606

  • Upstate Gastroenterology Associates, PC

    Troy, New York, 12180

  • Oklahoma Gastroenterology Associates, LLC

    Tulsa, Oklahoma, 74104

  • Avamar Center for Endoscopy

    Warren, Ohio, 44484

  • Covenant Clinic

    Waterloo, Iowa, 50702

  • Metabolic Research Institute, Inc.

    West Palm Beach, Florida, 33401

Other trials in United States

About this study

Official title: A Multicenter, Open-Label, Treatment Extension Trial to Evalaute the Long-Term Safety and Tolerability of Mesalamine Pellet Formulation

To evaluate the long-term safety and tolerability of encapsulated mesalamine Granules (eMG) (formerly referred to as Mesalamine Pellets [MP]) in participants with ulcerative colitis currently in remission.

Read the detailed description

This is a Phase 3, multicenter, open-label, treatment extension study evaluating the long-term safety and tolerability of eMG given once daily (QD) in participants who successfully participated in a double-blind lead-in study (MPUC3003 [NCT00744016 ] or MPUC3004 [NCT00767728 ]) or new participants who are currently in remission from symptoms of ulcerative colitis.

Being tested
Encapsulated Mesalamine Granules (eMG)
Keywords
UC, Ulcerative colitis, Inflammatory bowel disease, IBD
Medical subject headings
Colitis, Ulcerative, Inflammatory Bowel Diseases

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Encapsulated Mesalamine Granules (eMG)Drug

    Also called Mesalamine pellets

    eMG capsules will be administered per dose and schedule specified in the arm.

Study groups in NCT00326209
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Encapsulated Mesalamine Granules (eMG)ExperimentalParticipants will receive eMG 1.5 grams (4 capsules of eMG 0.375 grams each) QD orally in the morning for up to 24 months.
Receives: Drug: Encapsulated Mesalamine Granules (eMG)

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)

    An AE was defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a participant who received study drug without regard to possibility of causal relationship. A TEAE was defined as any event with a start date occurring on or after treatment Day 1 or, if pre-existing, worsening after treatment Day 1. Serious AEs were defined as death, a life-threatening AE, inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, persistent or significant disability or incapacity, a congenital anomaly or birth defect, or an important medical event that jeopardized participant and required medical intervention to prevent 1 of the outcomes listed in this definition. A summary of other non-serious AEs and all serious AEs, regardless of causality is located in Reported AE section.

    Measured: Baseline (Day 1) up to follow-up (24.5 months)

  2. Number of Participants Who Prematurely Discontinued Treatment

    Number of participants who prematurely discontinued treatment due to any reason were reported.

    Measured: Baseline up to Month 24

  3. Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant (PCS) Hematology and Blood Chemistry Abnormalities

    Criteria for potentially clinically significant abnormal hematology and blood chemistry values included: hemoglobin (grams/deciliter [g/dL]): <10 and ≥3 decrease, or >20; hematocrit (%): <30 and ≥10 decrease, or >60; platelets (*10^9 cells/liter): <100 or >700 (normal: 150-400); white blood cells (*10^9 cells/liter): <2.3 or >16.2 (normal: 3.5-11.1); alanine aminotransferase (units/liter [U/L]): ≥3 * upper limit of normal (ULN) (normal range 0-47 U/L); aspartate aminotransferase (U/L): ≥3 * ULN (normal range 0-37 U/L); total bilirubin (micromoles/liter [µmol/L]): >2 times; and calcium creatinine clearance (milliliters/minute [mL/min]): ≤50.

    Measured: Baseline up to follow-up (24.5 months)

  4. Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Change From Baseline in Vital Signs

    Vital signs included systolic and diastolic blood pressure, pulse rate, body temperature, or body weight.

    Measured: Baseline, up to follow-up visit (Month 24.5)

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted16 May 2006 (estimated)
  2. Study start22 Dec 2005
  3. Primary completion5 May 2008
  4. Study completion5 May 2008

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 3
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
393 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT00326209
Sponsor's protocol ID
MPUC3005
Status last verified
Oct 2019
First submitted
12 May 2006
Last updated
1 Nov 2019

Publications

  • Lichtenstein GR, Gordon GL, Zakko S, Murthy U, Sedghi S, Pruitt R, Barrett AC, Bortey E, Paterson C, Forbes WP. Long-Term Benefit of Mesalamine Granules for Patients Who Achieved Corticosteroid-Induced Ulcerative Colitis Remission. Dig Dis Sci. 2016 Jan;61(1):221-9. doi: 10.1007/s10620-015-3866-7. Epub 2015 Nov 12.

    PubMed 26563167

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 3 study testing Encapsulated Mesalamine Granules (eMG) in people with Ulcerative Colitis, run by Bausch Health Americas, Inc. at 61 sites in United States.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 15 inclusion and 9 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 1 Nov 2019. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 61 sites in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this phase mean?

Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 1 Nov 2019). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) (time frame: Baseline (Day 1) up to follow-up (24.5 months)). The study lists 4 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT00326209, which also lists 1 linked publication.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 1 Nov 2019.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in