AzTrials
AzTrials

DyspneaNCT00327873

Palliative Oxygen for the Relief of Breathlessness

A study testing Oxygen and Medical Air in people with Dyspnea, run by National Health and Medical Research Council, Australia at 7 sites in 3 countries.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The main goal of this study is to establish the effectiveness of palliative oxygen in the context within which it is usually provided--relief of the sensation of breathlessness and improvement in quality of life for people with maximally-treated life-limiting illness. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Dyspnea
What is being tested?
Oxygen and Medical Air
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
240 participants
Where
7 sitesin 3 countries
Study dates
May 2005to Mar 2008
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Adult patients with intractable dyspnea and PaO2>55mmHg in the setting of terminal illness where the underlying cause has been maximally treated; a medical specialist must document that all identified reversible causes of the dyspnea have been treated; PaO2 measurement must be in the last month
  • Dyspnea at rest or with minimal exertion, as measured by a score of ≥ 3 on the Medical Research Council categorical dyspnea exertion scale
  • On stable medications over the prior week except routine "as needed" medications.
  • Survival of at least 1 month in the opinion of the treating physician

Who cannot join

  • Meets international guidelines for long-term oxygen therapy with PaO2 56-59mmHg, i.e. symptomatic pulmonary hypertension with cor pulmonale
  • Hemoglobin<10.0g/dL as measured within one month of baseline evaluation
  • PaCO2 >50 mm Hg.
  • Confusion as measured by Folstein Mini-mental Status Exam <24/30
  • Current oxygen therapy or continuous oxygen therapy in previous week
  • Actively smoking
Show all 9Show fewer
  • Active respiratory or cardiac event in the previous 2 weeks, not including upper respiratory tract infections; illness must be resolved for at least 2 weeks prior to baseline evaluation, as judged by a doctor involved in the care of the patient
  • Previous respiratory failure induced by oxygen
  • Unable to give informed consent or complete diary entries

Trial locations and contacts

7 sites in 3 countries.

7 sites in 3 countries

Australia4 sites
  • Flinders University, Southern Adelaide Palliative Services

    Adelaide, South Australia, 5041

  • Statewide Palliative Care Service

    Launceston, Tasmania, 7250

  • Austin Health

    Melbourne, Victoria, 3084

  • Sydney Area Health Service, Sydney Cancer Centre

    Sydney, New South Wales, 2050

Other trials in Australia

United Kingdom2 sites
  • St Nicholas Hospice

    Cambridge, Cambridge, IP33 2QY UK

  • Nottingham University

    Nottingham, Nottingham, NG5 1PB

Other trials in United Kingdom

United States1 site
  • Duke University Department of Medicine, Division of Medical Oncology

    Durham, North Carolina, 27710

Other trials in United States

About this study

Official title: A Multi-center Randomized Double-blind Controlled Trial of Oxygen Versus Medical Air for the Relief of Breathlessness in Patients With Intractable Dyspnea and PaO2>55mmHg

The main goal of this study is to establish the effectiveness of palliative oxygen in the context within which it is usually provided--relief of the sensation of breathlessness and improvement in quality of life for people with maximally-treated life-limiting illness.

Read the detailed description

When further medical management will not relieve intractable breathlessness, palliative oxygen is often prescribed regardless of whether the person meets the common oxygen funding criteria of severely low blood oxygen levels. The results of this study will inform best practice in the care of people with advanced life-limiting illness and intractable breathlessness, aid in the development of rational funding guidelines, and answer an international debate on the role of palliative oxygen.

This study is a definitive international multi-center randomized double-blind controlled trial of oxygen versus medical air for the relief of breathlessness in participants with intractable dyspnea and PaO2>55mmHg (a measure of blood oxygen levels). Specific aims include demonstration of the effectiveness of oxygen versus medical air in relieving breathlessness in the palliative setting (Specific Aim 1) and improving QOL (Specific Aim 2). Additionally, we will seek to establish which patients derive the greatest benefit (Specific Aim 3), the risks of therapy (Specific Aim 4), and the costs of therapy (Specific Aim 5). The primary hypothesis is that oxygen therapy is superior to air in relieving the sensation of breathlessness for patients with intractable dyspnea due to life-limiting illness in the setting of PaO2>55mmHg.

All participants are enrolled as outpatients. The "eligibility visit" occurs about 5-7 days before starting the study and will include review of the consent form, a short interview, physical exam, and blood tests. The visit can occur in the home or clinic. The blood tests include regular venipuncture and also an arterial blood gas, if these studies have not been done in the preceding month. The "randomization visit" occurs 2 days before the study starts (Day -2) and includes a short interview and quality of life (QOL) questionnaire; this visit is usually done in the home but can also occur in the clinic. The oxygen or air concentrators are delivered to the home on Day 0 by a trained person from the oxygen company. On the same day there is also a brief home visit from the study nurse that includes a short interview and QOL questionnaire. The participant uses the oxygen or medical air gas each of 7 days (Days 0-6) for at least 15 hours each day. While using the oxygen/air the participant fills out a short diary form in the morning and evening, within 30 minutes of waking up or retiring. The diary focuses on the breathlessness, how the participant is feeling, and potential side effects of the gas. The study nurse conducts a "check-in" telephone call on Day 3 to make sure the participant is doing OK. On the last day (Day 6) the nurse visits the home to conduct a brief interview with a short QOL questionnaire. The oxygen company will pick up the concentrator, usually on Day 7.

Conditions
Dyspnea
Being tested
Oxygen, Medical Air
Keywords
breathlessness, shortness of breath, end-of-life care, hospice
Medical subject headings
Dyspnea

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • OxygenOther

    2L/min for 15 hours or greater per day via concentrator and nasal cannulae for 7 days

  • Medical AirOther

    2L/min for 15 hours or greater per day via concentrator and nasal cannulae for 7 days

Study groups in NCT00327873
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
AExperimentalOxygen
Receives: Other: Oxygen
BActive comparatorMedical Air
Receives: Other: Medical Air

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Changes in relief from the sensation of breathlessness

    Measured: 7 days

Secondary outcomes (4)
  1. Changes in quality of life (QOL)

    Measured: 7 days

  2. Identification of patients who benefit from palliative oxygen

    Measured: 7 days

  3. Identification of side effects

    Measured: 7 days

  4. Documentation of costs of palliative oxygen

    Measured: 7 days

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted19 May 2006 (estimated)
  2. Study startMay 2005
  3. Primary completionMar 2008
  4. Study completionMar 2008

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Triple blind
Who is masked
Participant, Care provider, Investigator
Enrolment
240 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT00327873
Sponsor's protocol ID
AG0064
Status last verified
Feb 2009
First submitted
18 May 2006
Last updated
14 Dec 2009
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
Yes

Publications

  • Abernethy AP, Currow DC, Frith P, Fazekas B. Prescribing palliative oxygen: a clinician survey of expected benefit and patterns of use. Palliat Med. 2005 Mar;19(2):168-70. doi: 10.1177/026921630501900219. No abstract available.

    PubMed 15810762
  • Booth S, Wade R, Johnson M, Kite S, Swannick M, Anderson H; Expert Working Group of the Scientific Committee of the Association of Palliative Medicine. The use of oxygen in the palliation of breathlessness. A report of the expert working group of the Scientific Committee of the Association of Palliative Medicine. Respir Med. 2004 Jan;98(1):66-77. doi: 10.1016/j.rmed.2003.08.008.

    PubMed 14959816
  • Guyatt GH, McKim DA, Austin P, Bryan R, Norgren J, Weaver B, Goldstein RS. Appropriateness of domiciliary oxygen delivery. Chest. 2000 Nov;118(5):1303-8. doi: 10.1378/chest.118.5.1303.

    PubMed 11083678
  • Bruera E, Sweeney C, Willey J, Palmer JL, Strasser F, Morice RC, Pisters K. A randomized controlled trial of supplemental oxygen versus air in cancer patients with dyspnea. Palliat Med. 2003 Dec;17(8):659-63. doi: 10.1191/0269216303pm826oa.

    PubMed 14694916
  • Abernethy AP, McDonald CF, Frith PA, Clark K, Herndon JE 2nd, Marcello J, Young IH, Bull J, Wilcock A, Booth S, Wheeler JL, Tulsky JA, Crockett AJ, Currow DC. Effect of palliative oxygen versus room air in relief of breathlessness in patients with refractory dyspnoea: a double-blind, randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2010 Sep 4;376(9743):784-93. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(10)61115-4.

    PubMed 20816546

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Oxygen and Medical Air in people with Dyspnea, run by National Health and Medical Research Council, Australia at 7 sites in 3 countries.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 9 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 14 Dec 2009. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 7 sites in Australia, United Kingdom, United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Changes in relief from the sensation of breathlessness (time frame: 7 days). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT00327873, which also lists 5 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 14 Dec 2009; AzTrials last refreshed its copy on 7 Nov 2026.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in