AzTrials
AzTrials

Acute Organophosphorus Pesticide PoisoningNCT00333944

Study to Know the Efficacy of Higher Doses of Pralidoxime in Patients of Organophpsphorus Poisoning.

A study testing Pralidoxime(drug) in people with Acute Organophosphorus Pesticide Poisoning, run by Giriraj Hospital at 1 site in India.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The purpose of this study is to determine whether high doses of pralidoxime(PAM) are effective as compare to lower doses of PAM in the management of moderately sever organophosphorus poisoning patients. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 12 years and older
What is being tested?
Pralidoxime(drug)
How many people
200 participants
Where
1 siteIndia
Study dates
May 2000to Jun 2003
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 12 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Child, Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • -patients with a history of poisoning by an organophosphorus pesticide and clinical features of poisoning.

Who cannot join

  • patients who
  • were under 12 years
  • had chronic disease
  • had malignancy
  • were pregnant,
  • presented more than 24 hrs post-ingestion,
  • who could not be resuscitated successfully in the emergency room of our ospital

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

India1 site
  • Giriraj Hospital and Intensive Care Unit.

    Baramati. Pune District., Maharashtra, 413 102.

Other trials in India

About this study

Official title: Effectiveness of High Dose Pralidoxime in the Treatment of Organophosphorus Pesticide Poisoning - a Randomised Controlled Trial

The purpose of this study is to determine whether high doses of pralidoxime(PAM) are effective as compare to lower doses of PAM in the management of moderately sever organophosphorus poisoning patients.

Read the detailed description

Standard treatment of organophosphorus pesticide poisoning involves administration of intravenous atropine and oximes to counter acetylcholinesterase inhibition.1 Treatment with atropine is well established, but the efficacy and dosage schedule of oximes are controversial.2-5 A dose of 1g every four to six hours has been the standard regimen in Asian district hospitals but many clinicians remain unconvinced by its effectiveness.3 Randomised controlled trials (RCT) performed in Vellore during the nineties compared a 12g infusion over 3-4 days with a 1g bolus dose and then with placebo.6,7 The authors reported no benefit from pralidoxime and an increased mortality in those receiving the infusion, and have stated that pralidoxime should not be given to organophosphorus poisoned patients.2

Others consider that the dosage regimen was not ideal, with therapeutic concentrations being obtained rarely during the treatment.3,4 Furthermore, many patients presented late and had taken dimethyl pesticides - a class that does not respond well to oximes after several hours - biasing the study against finding benefit.

The proposed minimum effective plasma levels for pralidoxime of 4 mg/L were based on in vitro and animal experiments by Sundwall.8 Recent evidence, however, suggests that higher blood concentrations of pralidoxime are needed to antagonise the toxic effects of many pesticides and that a bolus loading infusion followed by a maintenance infusion would be the best regimen.9 The WHO have proposed that patients receive around 30mg/kg pralidoxime salt as a loading dose followed by an infusion of at least 8mg/kg/hr (roughly equivalent to 1-2 g bolus followed by 0·5 g/h in a 50kg south Asian patient).9,10 However, no trials have yet been performed to determine whether such a regimen reduces morbidity and mortality in severely poisoned patients.3 Since organophosphorus pesticides kill hundreds of thousands of people in rural Asia every year, it is essential to determine whether it benefits or harms such poisoned patients.

Our hospital has typically used a regimen of 1g q4h in organophosphorus poisoned patients but we were unconvinced about the effectiveness of this expensive drug since many patients required ventilation for >10 days. We informally treated several patients with the WHO-recommended regimen but saw little benefit. Since pralidoxime has a high therapeutic index, we then decided to conduct a RCT with still higher doses, i.e. to compare a 1 g infusion every hour (q1h, 24 g/day) with 1g every four hours (q4h, 6 g/day), after a 2 g loading dose, to assess the effectiveness of high dose pralidoxime in organophosphorus poisoned patients.

Being tested
Pralidoxime(drug)
Keywords
Organophosphorus poisoning, Atropine, Pralidoxime, Intermediate syndrome.
Medical subject headings
Organophosphate Poisoning

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Pralidoxime(drug)Drug

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Median atropine dose required in first 24 hours

  2. proportion of patients who required intubation or developed intermediate syndrome

  3. number of days ventilated and required ICU care

Secondary outcomes (3)
  1. pneumonia (aspiration or ventilator-associated)

  2. mean systolic and diastolic blood pressure (BP) in first 24 hours

  3. case fatality

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted6 Jun 2006 (estimated)
  2. Study startMay 2000
  3. Study completionJun 2003

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Crossover
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
200 participants
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT00333944
Sponsor's protocol ID
GRH/IERC/2000/12
Status last verified
May 2000
First submitted
5 Jun 2006
Last updated
6 Jun 2006
Results posted
No

Publications

  • Pawar KS, Bhoite RR, Pillay CP, Chavan SC, Malshikare DS, Garad SG. Continuous pralidoxime infusion versus repeated bolus injection to treat organophosphorus pesticide poisoning: a randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2006 Dec 16;368(9553):2136-41. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(06)69862-0.

    PubMed 17174705

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Pralidoxime(drug) in people with Acute Organophosphorus Pesticide Poisoning, run by Giriraj Hospital at 1 site in India.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 7 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 6 Jun 2006. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in India. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Median atropine dose required in first 24 hours. The study lists 3 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT00333944, which also lists 1 linked publication.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 6 Jun 2006.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in