Acute Organophosphorus Pesticide PoisoningNCT00333944
Study to Know the Efficacy of Higher Doses of Pralidoxime in Patients of Organophpsphorus Poisoning.
A study testing Pralidoxime(drug) in people with Acute Organophosphorus Pesticide Poisoning, run by Giriraj Hospital at 1 site in India.
Trial summary
The purpose of this study is to determine whether high doses of pralidoxime(PAM) are effective as compare to lower doses of PAM in the management of moderately sever organophosphorus poisoning patients. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 12 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Acute Organophosphorus Pesticide Poisoning
- What is being tested?
- Pralidoxime(drug)
- How many people
- 200 participants
- Where
- 1 siteIndia
- Study dates
- May 2000to Jun 2003
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 12 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Child, Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- -patients with a history of poisoning by an organophosphorus pesticide and clinical features of poisoning.
Who cannot join
- patients who
- were under 12 years
- had chronic disease
- had malignancy
- were pregnant,
- presented more than 24 hrs post-ingestion,
- who could not be resuscitated successfully in the emergency room of our ospital
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
India1 site
Giriraj Hospital and Intensive Care Unit.
Baramati. Pune District., Maharashtra, 413 102.
About this study
Official title: Effectiveness of High Dose Pralidoxime in the Treatment of Organophosphorus Pesticide Poisoning - a Randomised Controlled Trial
The purpose of this study is to determine whether high doses of pralidoxime(PAM) are effective as compare to lower doses of PAM in the management of moderately sever organophosphorus poisoning patients.
Read the detailed description
Standard treatment of organophosphorus pesticide poisoning involves administration of intravenous atropine and oximes to counter acetylcholinesterase inhibition.1 Treatment with atropine is well established, but the efficacy and dosage schedule of oximes are controversial.2-5 A dose of 1g every four to six hours has been the standard regimen in Asian district hospitals but many clinicians remain unconvinced by its effectiveness.3 Randomised controlled trials (RCT) performed in Vellore during the nineties compared a 12g infusion over 3-4 days with a 1g bolus dose and then with placebo.6,7 The authors reported no benefit from pralidoxime and an increased mortality in those receiving the infusion, and have stated that pralidoxime should not be given to organophosphorus poisoned patients.2
Others consider that the dosage regimen was not ideal, with therapeutic concentrations being obtained rarely during the treatment.3,4 Furthermore, many patients presented late and had taken dimethyl pesticides - a class that does not respond well to oximes after several hours - biasing the study against finding benefit.
The proposed minimum effective plasma levels for pralidoxime of 4 mg/L were based on in vitro and animal experiments by Sundwall.8 Recent evidence, however, suggests that higher blood concentrations of pralidoxime are needed to antagonise the toxic effects of many pesticides and that a bolus loading infusion followed by a maintenance infusion would be the best regimen.9 The WHO have proposed that patients receive around 30mg/kg pralidoxime salt as a loading dose followed by an infusion of at least 8mg/kg/hr (roughly equivalent to 1-2 g bolus followed by 0·5 g/h in a 50kg south Asian patient).9,10 However, no trials have yet been performed to determine whether such a regimen reduces morbidity and mortality in severely poisoned patients.3 Since organophosphorus pesticides kill hundreds of thousands of people in rural Asia every year, it is essential to determine whether it benefits or harms such poisoned patients.
Our hospital has typically used a regimen of 1g q4h in organophosphorus poisoned patients but we were unconvinced about the effectiveness of this expensive drug since many patients required ventilation for >10 days. We informally treated several patients with the WHO-recommended regimen but saw little benefit. Since pralidoxime has a high therapeutic index, we then decided to conduct a RCT with still higher doses, i.e. to compare a 1 g infusion every hour (q1h, 24 g/day) with 1g every four hours (q4h, 6 g/day), after a 2 g loading dose, to assess the effectiveness of high dose pralidoxime in organophosphorus poisoned patients.
- Being tested
- Pralidoxime(drug)
- Keywords
- Organophosphorus poisoning, Atropine, Pralidoxime, Intermediate syndrome.
- Medical subject headings
- Organophosphate Poisoning
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Pralidoxime(drug)Drug
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Median atropine dose required in first 24 hours
proportion of patients who required intubation or developed intermediate syndrome
number of days ventilated and required ICU care
Secondary outcomes (3)
pneumonia (aspiration or ventilator-associated)
mean systolic and diastolic blood pressure (BP) in first 24 hours
case fatality
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted6 Jun 2006 (estimated)
- Study startMay 2000
- Study completionJun 2003
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (1)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Acute Organophosphorus Pesticide PoisoningStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Crossover
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 200 participants
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Giriraj Hospital
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Investigators
- Kirti S Pawar, MBBS,DA, Principal investigator
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00333944
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- GRH/IERC/2000/12
- Status last verified
- May 2000
- First submitted
- 5 Jun 2006
- Last updated
- 6 Jun 2006
- Results posted
- No
Publications
Pawar KS, Bhoite RR, Pillay CP, Chavan SC, Malshikare DS, Garad SG. Continuous pralidoxime infusion versus repeated bolus injection to treat organophosphorus pesticide poisoning: a randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2006 Dec 16;368(9553):2136-41. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(06)69862-0.
PubMed 17174705
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 6 Jun 2006. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Effectiveness of High Dose Pralidoxime in the Treatment of Organophosphorus Pesticide Poisoning - a Randomised Controlled Trial
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00333944
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- GRH/IERC/2000/12
- Keywords
- Organophosphorus poisoning, Atropine, Pralidoxime, Intermediate syndrome.
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 200 participants
- Lead sponsor
- Giriraj HospitalUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- May 2000
- Study completion
- Jun 2003
- First posted
- 6 Jun 2006 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The purpose of this study is to determine whether high doses of pralidoxime(PAM) are effective as compare to lower doses of PAM in the management of moderately sever organophosphorus poisoning patients.
Detailed description
Standard treatment of organophosphorus pesticide poisoning involves administration of intravenous atropine and oximes to counter acetylcholinesterase inhibition.1 Treatment with atropine is well established, but the efficacy and dosage schedule of oximes are controversial.2-5 A dose of 1g every four to six hours has been the standard regimen in Asian district hospitals but many clinicians remain unconvinced by its effectiveness.3 Randomised controlled trials (RCT) performed in Vellore during the nineties compared a 12g infusion over 3-4 days with a 1g bolus dose and then with placebo.6,7 The authors reported no benefit from pralidoxime and an increased mortality in those receiving the infusion, and have stated that pralidoxime should not be given to organophosphorus poisoned patients.2
Others consider that the dosage regimen was not ideal, with therapeutic concentrations being obtained rarely during the treatment.3,4 Furthermore, many patients presented late and had taken dimethyl pesticides - a class that does not respond well to oximes after several hours - biasing the study against finding benefit.
The proposed minimum effective plasma levels for pralidoxime of 4 mg/L were based on in vitro and animal experiments by Sundwall.8 Recent evidence, however, suggests that higher blood concentrations of pralidoxime are needed to antagonise the toxic effects of many pesticides and that a bolus loading infusion followed by a maintenance infusion would be the best regimen.9 The WHO have proposed that patients receive around 30mg/kg pralidoxime salt as a loading dose followed by an infusion of at least 8mg/kg/hr (roughly equivalent to 1-2 g bolus followed by 0·5 g/h in a 50kg south Asian patient).9,10 However, no trials have yet been performed to determine whether such a regimen reduces morbidity and mortality in severely poisoned patients.3 Since organophosphorus pesticides kill hundreds of thousands of people in rural Asia every year, it is essential to determine whether it benefits or harms such poisoned patients.
Our hospital has typically used a regimen of 1g q4h in organophosphorus poisoned patients but we were unconvinced about the effectiveness of this expensive drug since many patients required ventilation for >10 days. We informally treated several patients with the WHO-recommended regimen but saw little benefit. Since pralidoxime has a high therapeutic index, we then decided to conduct a RCT with still higher doses, i.e. to compare a 1 g infusion every hour (q1h, 24 g/day) with 1g every four hours (q4h, 6 g/day), after a 2 g loading dose, to assess the effectiveness of high dose pralidoxime in organophosphorus poisoned patients.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Crossover
- Masking
- None (open label)
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 12 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Child, Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (1 listed)
- -patients with a history of poisoning by an organophosphorus pesticide and clinical features of poisoning.
Key exclusion criteria (7 listed)
- patients who
- were under 12 years
- had chronic disease
- had malignancy
- were pregnant,
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Pralidoxime(drug) | Drug | – |
Primary outcome
Median atropine dose required in first 24 hours
proportion of patients who required intubation or developed intermediate syndrome
number of days ventilated and required ICU care
3 secondary outcomes
pneumonia (aspiration or ventilator-associated)
mean systolic and diastolic blood pressure (BP) in first 24 hours
case fatality
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 6 Jun 2006.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 17174705Pawar KS, Bhoite RR, Pillay CP, Chavan SC, Malshikare DS, Garad SG. Continuous pralidoxime infusion versus repeated bolus injection to treat organophosphorus pesticide poisoning: a randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2006 Dec 16;368(9553):2136-41. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(06)69862-0.
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Kirti S Pawar, MBBS,DA principal investigator
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Pralidoxime(drug) in people with Acute Organophosphorus Pesticide Poisoning, run by Giriraj Hospital at 1 site in India.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 7 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 6 Jun 2006. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in India. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Median atropine dose required in first 24 hours. The study lists 3 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT00333944, which also lists 1 linked publication.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 6 Jun 2006.