AzTrials
AzTrials

InfertilityPhase 4NCT00334243

Protocols for Improved in Vitro Fertilization (IVF) Outcomes

A Phase 4 study testing Microflare protocol for IVF, Antagonist protocol for IVF and Demi-halt protocol for IVF in people with Infertility, run by University of California, San Francisco at 1 site in United States.

Terminated

Stopped early. The study ended before it was planned to and will not resume.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Many infertile patients have a decreased chance of becoming pregnant when using in vitro fertilization (IVF). For these patients, many different treatments are available, but none of them have been shown to be better than the others. We are testing which of three different treatments are better than the others. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 45 years, women only
Conditions the study is for
Infertility
What is being tested?
Microflare protocol for IVF, Antagonist protocol for IVF and Demi-halt protocol for IVF
How many people
2 participants
Where
1 siteUnited States
Study dates
Jun 2006to Nov 2007
Phase
Phase 4
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 45 years
  • Women only
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult

Who may be able to join

  • Infertile patients
  • Undergoing IVF
  • Antral Follicle Count Less than 10
  • Prior history of less than 5 oocytes generated during an IVF cycle

Who cannot join

None listed.

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

United States1 site
  • University of California, San Francisco

    San Francisco, California, 94115

Other trials in United States

About this study

Official title: Protocol Evaluation for Improved In Vitro Fertilization Outcomes

Many infertile patients have a decreased chance of becoming pregnant when using in vitro fertilization (IVF). For these patients, many different treatments are available, but none of them have been shown to be better than the others. We are testing which of three different treatments are better than the others. Patients who are expected to have a decreased response to ovarian stimulation will be randomized to either a microflare protocol, an antagonist protocol, or a demi-halt protocol.

Read the detailed description

Infertile patients with an anticipated poor response to ovarian stimulation will be randomized to one of three different protocols in their upcoming IVF cycle. Each of the protocols will be performed as is the standard of care with the addition of serum evaluation during the course of the stimulation as well as follicular fluid analysis which is obtained as a byproduct of the oocyte retrieval. Chart review will be performed to collect background characteristics (including age, ethnicity, previous fertility treatment), treatment response (such as oocyte number, embryo grade, embryo quality), and pregnancy outcome (such as miscarriage, singleton pregnancy, or higher-order multiple pregnancy). Statistical analysis will be performed to determine if one protocol leads to higher pregnancy rates and multivariate analysis will be performed to determine potential etiologic variables.

Conditions
Infertility
Being tested
Microflare protocol for IVF, Antagonist protocol for IVF, Demi-halt protocol for IVF
Keywords
in vitro fertilization, infertile, infertility, pregnancy, pregnancy rates, microflare protocol, antagonist protocol, demi-halt protocol, poor responders, low antral follicle count, Infertile Patients undergoing in vitro fertilization (IVF), Patients with a previous poor response to ovarian stimulation, Patients with an antral follicle count of less than 10
Medical subject headings
Infertility

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Microflare protocol for IVFDrug

  • Antagonist protocol for IVFDrug

  • Demi-halt protocol for IVFDrug

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Pregnancy Rate

Secondary outcomes (5)
  1. Cycle Cancellation Rates

  2. Number of Oocytes Generated

  3. Number of Embryos Generated

  4. Serum hormonal evaluation

  5. Follicular fluid evaluation

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted7 Jun 2006 (estimated)
  2. Study startJun 2006
  3. Primary completionAug 2007
  4. Study completionNov 2007

Why it stopped: stopped due to limited enrollment. 2 subjects were enrolled. There was NO enrollment after November 2007.

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 4
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
2 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT00334243
Sponsor's protocol ID
Purcell-01
Status last verified
Oct 2011
First submitted
6 Jun 2006
Last updated
6 Oct 2011
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
Yes

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 4 study testing Microflare protocol for IVF, Antagonist protocol for IVF and Demi-halt protocol for IVF in people with Infertility, run by University of California, San Francisco at 1 site in United States.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 0 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: stopped early, as of the sponsor's last update on 6 Oct 2011. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this phase mean?

Phase 4 studies take place after a treatment is approved, to learn more about its long-term benefits and risks in everyday use.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

The study was stopped early (reason given: stopped due to limited enrollment. 2 subjects were enrolled. There was NO enrollment after November 2007.). Results are not available in the source record.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Pregnancy Rate. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 6 Oct 2011; AzTrials last refreshed its copy on 29 Oct 2026.

Free account

Keep searching with a free account

You’ve used your 3 free searches for this session. Log in or create a free AzTrials account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in