ImmunosuppressionNCT00336817
A Prospective Study on the Tolerability and Efficacy of the de Novo Use of Myfortic in Liver Transplant Recipients
A study testing Myfortic and CellCept in people with Immunosuppression, run by University of Pittsburgh at 1 site in United States.
Trial summary
The objective of this study is to compare the safety and efficacy of Myfortic with CellCept in liver transplant patients. Myfortic and CellCept are both immunosuppressive (anti-rejection) drugs. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 80 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Immunosuppression
- What is being tested?
- Myfortic and CellCept
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 30 participants
- Where
- 1 siteUnited States
- Study dates
- Nov 2006to Nov 2008
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 80 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- ALL patients will be adult liver transplant recipients, males or females, 18-80 years of age.
- Patients must be 30 to 180 days (1 to 6 months) post-transplant to be eligible.
- Patients currently receiving tacrolimus or cyclosporine with or without corticosteroids as part of their immunosuppressive regimen.
- Patients with renal insufficiency (history of renal insufficiency or renal failure in the past, patients on hemodialysis, patients with a rising creatinine post-transplant).
- Patients with biopsy-proven acute cellular rejection (mild, moderate, or severe based on Rejection Activity Index (RAI) as graded by pathologists at UPMC) or repeated bouts of rejection (greater than 2 episodes within a 30 day period).
- Patients with tacrolimus- or cyclosporine-induced neurotoxicity.
- Females of childbearing potential must have a negative serum pregnancy test prior to the inclusion period.
Who cannot join
- Multi-organ transplant patients.
- HIV positive patients.
- Living-related liver transplant recipients
- Pregnant patients and nursing mothers.
- Patients with a history of extra-hepatic malignancy within the last five years, except excised squamous or basal cell carcinoma of the skin.
- Patients with thrombocytopenia (<50,000/mm3), with an absolute neutrophil count of <1,000/mm3 and/or leukocytopenia (<2,000/mm3), and/or hemoglobin <7.0 g/dL prior to enrollment.
Show all 9Show fewer
- Presence of clinically significant infection requiring continued therapy, severe diarrhea, active peptic ulcer disease, or uncontrolled diabetes mellitus.
- Evidence of drug and/or alcohol abuse.
- Decisionally impaired subjects who are not medically or mentally capable of providing consent themselves
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
United States1 site
University of Pittsburgh Medical Center
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, 15213
About this study
The objective of this study is to compare the safety and efficacy of Myfortic with CellCept in liver transplant patients. Myfortic and CellCept are both immunosuppressive (anti-rejection) drugs. CellCept is commonly used after liver transplantation but gastrointestinal (GI) side effects are very common, sometimes necessitating in its discontinuation. Myfortic is a new drug similar to CellCept, except it is enteric-coated. Our hypothesis is that Myfortic has less GI side effects than CellCept and also has comparable effectiveness to CellCept.
Read the detailed description
This is a prospective, randomized, double-blinded, single center, safety and efficacy study comparing Myfortic with CellCept used after liver transplantation. Patients with biopsy-proven acute cellular rejection, renal insufficiency (i.e. acute or chronic renal failure requiring hemodialysis or patients with creatinine clearance < 50 ml/min), or calcineurin inhibitor-induced neurotoxicity (defined as the presence of neurologic symptoms such as tremors, altered mental status, seizures, etc) will be randomized to start on either Myfortic (720 mg po bid) or CellCept (1 gm po bid). In those patients with calcineurin-induced neurotoxicity or nephrotoxicity, tacrolimus or cyclosporine doses will also be reduced to maintain serum trough levels of 4-8 mg/dl or 100-200 mg/dl, respectively.
Comparison: Thirty patients will be enrolled and randomized in this two-armed, double-blinded study- half of the patients will receive Myfortic and the other half, CellCept.
- Conditions
- Immunosuppression
- Being tested
- Myfortic, CellCept
- Keywords
- Liver transplantation, mycophenolate mofetil, gastrointestinal, adverse effects
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
MyforticDrug
Myfortic 360mg or 720 mg BID for 90 days
CellCeptDrug
CellCept 500mg or 1000mg BID for 90 days
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Myfortic Group | Active comparator | Subjects in the Myfortic arm will receive Myfortic 360mg or 720 mg BID for 90 days Receives: Drug: Myfortic |
| CellCept Group | Active comparator | Subjects in the CellCept arm will receive CellCept 500mg or 1000mg BID for 90 days Receives: Drug: CellCept |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
GI Side Effects as Assessed by Gastro Intestinal Symptoms Rating Scale (GSRS) of Enteric-coated Mycophenolate Sodium vs Mycophenolate Mofetil
The GSRS contains 15 items, each rated on a seven-point Likert scale from no discomfort to very severe discomfort. Based on a factor analysis, the 15 GSRS items break down into the following five scale: abdominal pain syndrome ( abdominal pain, hunger pains, and nausea); reflux syndrome (heartburn and acid regurgitation), diarrhea syndrome (diarrhea, loose stools and urgent need for defecation), indigestion syndrome (borborygmus, abdominal distension, eructation and increased flatus) and constipation syndrome (constipation, hard stools, and feeling of incomplete evacuation).
The GSRS is a disease-specific instrument of 15 items combined into five symptom clusters depicting Reflux, Abdominal pain, Indigestion, Diarrhea, and Constipation. The GSRS has a seven-point graded Likert-type scale where 1 represents absence of troublesome symptoms and 7 represents very troublesome symptoms. The total GSRS range of scores is 15 to 105 with higher scores meaning the worst of symptoms.
Measured: screening, 2, 6 and 12 weeks
GI Side Effects as Assessed by Gastro Intestinal Symptoms Rating Scale (GSRS) of Enteric-coated Mycophenolate Sodium vs Mycophenolate Mofetil (Abdominal Pain Subscale)
The GSRS contains 15 items, each rated on a seven-point Likert scale from no discomfort to very severe discomfort. Based on a factor analysis, the 15 GSRS items break down into the following five scale: abdominal pain syndrome ( abdominal pain, hunger pains, and nausea); reflux syndrome (heartburn and acid regurgitation), diarrhea syndrome (diarrhea, loose stools and urgent need for defecation), indigestion syndrome (borborygmus, abdominal distension, eructation and increased flatus) and constipation syndrome (constipation, hard stools, and feeling of incomplete evacuation).
The GSRS is a disease-specific instrument of 15 items combined into five symptom clusters depicting Reflux, Abdominal pain, Indigestion, Diarrhea, and Constipation. The GSRS has a seven-point graded Likert-type scale where 1 represents absence of troublesome symptoms and 7 represents very troublesome symptoms.
The abdominal Pain subscale range is 3 to 21 with higher scores means worst symptoms
Measured: screening, 2, 6 and 12 weeks
GI Side Effects as Assessed by Gastro Intestinal Symptoms Rating Scale (GSRS) of Enteric-coated Mycophenolate Sodium vs Mycophenolate Mofetil (Reflux Subscale)
The GSRS contains 15 items, each rated on a seven-point Likert scale from no discomfort to very severe discomfort. Based on a factor analysis, the 15 GSRS items break down into the following five scale: abdominal pain syndrome ( abdominal pain, hunger pains, and nausea); reflux syndrome (heartburn and acid regurgitation), diarrhea syndrome (diarrhea, loose stools and urgent need for defecation), indigestion syndrome (borborygmus, abdominal distension, eructation and increased flatus) and constipation syndrome (constipation, hard stools, and feeling of incomplete evacuation).
The GSRS is a disease-specific instrument of 15 items combined into five symptom clusters depicting Reflux, Abdominal pain, Indigestion, Diarrhea, and Constipation. The GSRS has a seven-point graded Likert-type scale where 1 represents absence of troublesome symptoms and 7 represents very troublesome symptoms.
Reflux subscale range is 2 to 14 with higher scores means worst symptoms
Measured: screening, 2, 6 and 12 weeks
GI Side Effects as Assessed by Gastro Intestinal Symptoms Rating Scale (GSRS) of Enteric-coated Mycophenolate Sodium vs Mycophenolate Mofetil ( Indigestion Subscale)
The GSRS contains 15 items, each rated on a seven-point Likert scale from no discomfort to very severe discomfort. Based on a factor analysis, the 15 GSRS items break down into the following five scale: abdominal pain syndrome ( abdominal pain, hunger pains, and nausea); reflux syndrome (heartburn and acid regurgitation), diarrhea syndrome (diarrhea, loose stools and urgent need for defecation), indigestion syndrome (borborygmus, abdominal distension, eructation and increased flatus) and constipation syndrome (constipation, hard stools, and feeling of incomplete evacuation).
The GSRS is a disease-specific instrument of 15 items combined into five symptom clusters depicting Reflux, Abdominal pain, Indigestion, Diarrhea, and Constipation. The GSRS has a seven-point graded Likert-type scale where 1 represents absence of troublesome symptoms and 7 represents very troublesome symptoms.
The Indigestion subscale range is 4 to 28 with higher scores means worst symptoms
Measured: screening, 2, 6 and 12 weeks
GI Side Effects as Assessed by Gastro Intestinal Symptoms Rating Scale (GSRS) of Enteric-coated Mycophenolate Sodium vs Mycophenolate Mofetil ( Diarrhea Subscale)
The GSRS contains 15 items, each rated on a seven-point Likert scale from no discomfort to very severe discomfort. Based on a factor analysis, the 15 GSRS items break down into the following five scale: abdominal pain syndrome ( abdominal pain, hunger pains, and nausea); reflux syndrome (heartburn and acid regurgitation), diarrhea syndrome (diarrhea, loose stools and urgent need for defecation), indigestion syndrome (borborygmus, abdominal distension, eructation and increased flatus) and constipation syndrome (constipation, hard stools, and feeling of incomplete evacuation).
The GSRS is a disease-specific instrument of 15 items combined into five symptom clusters depicting Reflux, Abdominal pain, Indigestion, Diarrhea, and Constipation. The GSRS has a seven-point graded Likert-type scale where 1 represents absence of troublesome symptoms and 7 represents very troublesome symptoms.
The Diarrhea subscale range is 3 to 21 with higher scores means worst symptoms
Measured: screening, 2, 6 and 12 weeks
GI Side Effects as Assessed by Gastro Intestinal Symptoms Rating Scale (GSRS) of Enteric-coated Mycophenolate Sodium vs Mycophenolate Mofetil ( Constipation Subscale)
The GSRS contains 15 items, each rated on a seven-point Likert scale from no discomfort to very severe discomfort. Based on a factor analysis, the 15 GSRS items break down into the following five scale: abdominal pain syndrome ( abdominal pain, hunger pains, and nausea); reflux syndrome (heartburn and acid regurgitation), diarrhea syndrome (diarrhea, loose stools and urgent need for defecation), indigestion syndrome (borborygmus, abdominal distension, eructation and increased flatus) and constipation syndrome (constipation, hard stools, and feeling of incomplete evacuation).
The GSRS is a disease-specific instrument of 15 items combined into five symptom clusters depicting Reflux, Abdominal pain, Indigestion, Diarrhea, and Constipation. The GSRS has a seven-point graded Likert-type scale where 1 represents absence of troublesome symptoms and 7 represents very troublesome symptoms.
Constipation subscale range is 3 to 21 with higher scores means worst symptoms
Measured: screening, 2, 6 and 12 weeks
Number of Participants With Bone Marrow Suppression
Number of participants with: Thrombocytopenia (<50,000 mm3), Leukopenia (< 2000 mm3), absolute neutrophils count ( <1000 mm3) or hemoglobin ( < 7.0 g/dL)
Measured: 12 weeks
Incidence of Cytomegalovirus Infection or Disease During the Study Period
number of participants
Measured: 12 weeks
Secondary outcomes (3)
Drug Discontinuation Due to Side Effects
Drug discontinuation due to drug side effects regarding Cellcept and Myfortic.
Measured: 12 weeks
Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Decrease in Serum Creatinine From Baseline Through Week 12
Creatinine levels
Measured: 12 weeks
Number of Participants With Neurotoxicity
Measured: 12 weeks
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted14 Jun 2006 (estimated)
- Study startNov 2006
- Primary completionNov 2008
- Study completionNov 2008
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Other trials for ImmunosuppressionStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by University of PittsburghThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Quadruple blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 30 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- University of Pittsburgh
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Novartis Pharmaceuticals
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Roberto Lopez, MD, University of Pittsburgh
- Investigators
- Michael E de Vera, MD, Principal investigator, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00336817
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- CERL080A-US26
- Status last verified
- Mar 2017
- First submitted
- 12 Jun 2006
- Last updated
- 9 Mar 2017
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 9 Mar 2017. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- A Prospective Study on the Tolerability and Efficacy of the de Novo Use of Myfortic in Liver Transplant Recipients
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00336817
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- CERL080A-US26
- Conditions
- Immunosuppression
- Keywords
- Liver transplantation, mycophenolate mofetil, gastrointestinal, adverse effects
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 30 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- University of PittsburghUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Novartis Pharmaceuticals
- Study start
- Nov 2006
- Primary completion
- Nov 2008 (actual)
- Study completion
- Nov 2008 (actual)
- First posted
- 14 Jun 2006 (estimated)
- Results
- Posted 9 Mar 2017
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The objective of this study is to compare the safety and efficacy of Myfortic with CellCept in liver transplant patients. Myfortic and CellCept are both immunosuppressive (anti-rejection) drugs. CellCept is commonly used after liver transplantation but gastrointestinal (GI) side effects are very common, sometimes necessitating in its discontinuation. Myfortic is a new drug similar to CellCept, except it is enteric-coated. Our hypothesis is that Myfortic has less GI side effects than CellCept and also has comparable effectiveness to CellCept.
Detailed description
This is a prospective, randomized, double-blinded, single center, safety and efficacy study comparing Myfortic with CellCept used after liver transplantation. Patients with biopsy-proven acute cellular rejection, renal insufficiency (i.e. acute or chronic renal failure requiring hemodialysis or patients with creatinine clearance < 50 ml/min), or calcineurin inhibitor-induced neurotoxicity (defined as the presence of neurologic symptoms such as tremors, altered mental status, seizures, etc) will be randomized to start on either Myfortic (720 mg po bid) or CellCept (1 gm po bid). In those patients with calcineurin-induced neurotoxicity or nephrotoxicity, tacrolimus or cyclosporine doses will also be reduced to maintain serum trough levels of 4-8 mg/dl or 100-200 mg/dl, respectively.
Comparison: Thirty patients will be enrolled and randomized in this two-armed, double-blinded study- half of the patients will receive Myfortic and the other half, CellCept.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Quadruple blind (participant, care provider, investigator, outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Myfortic Group | Active comparator | Drug: MyforticSubjects in the Myfortic arm will receive Myfortic 360mg or 720 mg BID for 90 days |
| CellCept Group | Active comparator | Drug: CellCeptSubjects in the CellCept arm will receive CellCept 500mg or 1000mg BID for 90 days |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 80 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (7 listed)
- ALL patients will be adult liver transplant recipients, males or females, 18-80 years of age.
- Patients must be 30 to 180 days (1 to 6 months) post-transplant to be eligible.
- Patients currently receiving tacrolimus or cyclosporine with or without corticosteroids as part of their immunosuppressive regimen.
- Patients with renal insufficiency (history of renal insufficiency or renal failure in the past, patients on hemodialysis, patients with a rising creatinine post-transplant).
- Patients with biopsy-proven acute cellular rejection (mild, moderate, or severe based on Rejection Activity Index (RAI) as graded by pathologists at UPMC) or repeated bouts of rejection (greater than 2 episodes within a 30 day period).
Key exclusion criteria (9 listed)
- Multi-organ transplant patients.
- HIV positive patients.
- Living-related liver transplant recipients
- Pregnant patients and nursing mothers.
- Patients with a history of extra-hepatic malignancy within the last five years, except excised squamous or basal cell carcinoma of the skin.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| MyforticMyfortic 360mg or 720 mg BID for 90 days | Drug | Myfortic Group |
| CellCeptCellCept 500mg or 1000mg BID for 90 days | Drug | CellCept Group |
Primary outcome
GI Side Effects as Assessed by Gastro Intestinal Symptoms Rating Scale (GSRS) of Enteric-coated Mycophenolate Sodium vs Mycophenolate Mofetil
Time frame: screening, 2, 6 and 12 weeks
The GSRS contains 15 items, each rated on a seven-point Likert scale from no discomfort to very severe discomfort. Based on a factor analysis, the 15 GSRS items break down into the following five scale: abdominal pain syndrome ( abdominal pain, hunger pains, and nausea); reflux syndrome (heartburn and acid regurgitation), diarrhea syndrome (diarrhea, loose stools and urgent need for defecation), indigestion syndrome (borborygmus, abdominal distension, eructation and increased flatus) and constipation syndrome (constipation, hard stools, and feeling of incomplete evacuation). The GSRS is a disease-specific instrument of 15 items combined into five symptom clusters depicting Reflux, Abdominal pain, Indigestion, Diarrhea, and Constipation. The GSRS has a seven-point graded Likert-type scale where 1 represents absence of troublesome symptoms and 7 represents very troublesome symptoms. The total GSRS range of scores is 15 to 105 with higher scores meaning the worst of symptoms.
GI Side Effects as Assessed by Gastro Intestinal Symptoms Rating Scale (GSRS) of Enteric-coated Mycophenolate Sodium vs Mycophenolate Mofetil (Abdominal Pain Subscale)
Time frame: screening, 2, 6 and 12 weeks
The GSRS contains 15 items, each rated on a seven-point Likert scale from no discomfort to very severe discomfort. Based on a factor analysis, the 15 GSRS items break down into the following five scale: abdominal pain syndrome ( abdominal pain, hunger pains, and nausea); reflux syndrome (heartburn and acid regurgitation), diarrhea syndrome (diarrhea, loose stools and urgent need for defecation), indigestion syndrome (borborygmus, abdominal distension, eructation and increased flatus) and constipation syndrome (constipation, hard stools, and feeling of incomplete evacuation). The GSRS is a disease-specific instrument of 15 items combined into five symptom clusters depicting Reflux, Abdominal pain, Indigestion, Diarrhea, and Constipation. The GSRS has a seven-point graded Likert-type scale where 1 represents absence of troublesome symptoms and 7 represents very troublesome symptoms. The abdominal Pain subscale range is 3 to 21 with higher scores means worst symptoms
GI Side Effects as Assessed by Gastro Intestinal Symptoms Rating Scale (GSRS) of Enteric-coated Mycophenolate Sodium vs Mycophenolate Mofetil (Reflux Subscale)
Time frame: screening, 2, 6 and 12 weeks
The GSRS contains 15 items, each rated on a seven-point Likert scale from no discomfort to very severe discomfort. Based on a factor analysis, the 15 GSRS items break down into the following five scale: abdominal pain syndrome ( abdominal pain, hunger pains, and nausea); reflux syndrome (heartburn and acid regurgitation), diarrhea syndrome (diarrhea, loose stools and urgent need for defecation), indigestion syndrome (borborygmus, abdominal distension, eructation and increased flatus) and constipation syndrome (constipation, hard stools, and feeling of incomplete evacuation). The GSRS is a disease-specific instrument of 15 items combined into five symptom clusters depicting Reflux, Abdominal pain, Indigestion, Diarrhea, and Constipation. The GSRS has a seven-point graded Likert-type scale where 1 represents absence of troublesome symptoms and 7 represents very troublesome symptoms. Reflux subscale range is 2 to 14 with higher scores means worst symptoms
GI Side Effects as Assessed by Gastro Intestinal Symptoms Rating Scale (GSRS) of Enteric-coated Mycophenolate Sodium vs Mycophenolate Mofetil ( Indigestion Subscale)
Time frame: screening, 2, 6 and 12 weeks
The GSRS contains 15 items, each rated on a seven-point Likert scale from no discomfort to very severe discomfort. Based on a factor analysis, the 15 GSRS items break down into the following five scale: abdominal pain syndrome ( abdominal pain, hunger pains, and nausea); reflux syndrome (heartburn and acid regurgitation), diarrhea syndrome (diarrhea, loose stools and urgent need for defecation), indigestion syndrome (borborygmus, abdominal distension, eructation and increased flatus) and constipation syndrome (constipation, hard stools, and feeling of incomplete evacuation). The GSRS is a disease-specific instrument of 15 items combined into five symptom clusters depicting Reflux, Abdominal pain, Indigestion, Diarrhea, and Constipation. The GSRS has a seven-point graded Likert-type scale where 1 represents absence of troublesome symptoms and 7 represents very troublesome symptoms. The Indigestion subscale range is 4 to 28 with higher scores means worst symptoms
GI Side Effects as Assessed by Gastro Intestinal Symptoms Rating Scale (GSRS) of Enteric-coated Mycophenolate Sodium vs Mycophenolate Mofetil ( Diarrhea Subscale)
Time frame: screening, 2, 6 and 12 weeks
The GSRS contains 15 items, each rated on a seven-point Likert scale from no discomfort to very severe discomfort. Based on a factor analysis, the 15 GSRS items break down into the following five scale: abdominal pain syndrome ( abdominal pain, hunger pains, and nausea); reflux syndrome (heartburn and acid regurgitation), diarrhea syndrome (diarrhea, loose stools and urgent need for defecation), indigestion syndrome (borborygmus, abdominal distension, eructation and increased flatus) and constipation syndrome (constipation, hard stools, and feeling of incomplete evacuation). The GSRS is a disease-specific instrument of 15 items combined into five symptom clusters depicting Reflux, Abdominal pain, Indigestion, Diarrhea, and Constipation. The GSRS has a seven-point graded Likert-type scale where 1 represents absence of troublesome symptoms and 7 represents very troublesome symptoms. The Diarrhea subscale range is 3 to 21 with higher scores means worst symptoms
GI Side Effects as Assessed by Gastro Intestinal Symptoms Rating Scale (GSRS) of Enteric-coated Mycophenolate Sodium vs Mycophenolate Mofetil ( Constipation Subscale)
Time frame: screening, 2, 6 and 12 weeks
The GSRS contains 15 items, each rated on a seven-point Likert scale from no discomfort to very severe discomfort. Based on a factor analysis, the 15 GSRS items break down into the following five scale: abdominal pain syndrome ( abdominal pain, hunger pains, and nausea); reflux syndrome (heartburn and acid regurgitation), diarrhea syndrome (diarrhea, loose stools and urgent need for defecation), indigestion syndrome (borborygmus, abdominal distension, eructation and increased flatus) and constipation syndrome (constipation, hard stools, and feeling of incomplete evacuation). The GSRS is a disease-specific instrument of 15 items combined into five symptom clusters depicting Reflux, Abdominal pain, Indigestion, Diarrhea, and Constipation. The GSRS has a seven-point graded Likert-type scale where 1 represents absence of troublesome symptoms and 7 represents very troublesome symptoms. Constipation subscale range is 3 to 21 with higher scores means worst symptoms
Number of Participants With Bone Marrow Suppression
Time frame: 12 weeks
Number of participants with: Thrombocytopenia (<50,000 mm3), Leukopenia (< 2000 mm3), absolute neutrophils count ( <1000 mm3) or hemoglobin ( < 7.0 g/dL)
Incidence of Cytomegalovirus Infection or Disease During the Study Period
Time frame: 12 weeks
number of participants
3 secondary outcomes
Drug Discontinuation Due to Side Effects
Time frame: 12 weeks
Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Decrease in Serum Creatinine From Baseline Through Week 12
Time frame: 12 weeks
Number of Participants With Neurotoxicity
Time frame: 12 weeks
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 9 Mar 2017.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
Related trials for Immunosuppression
Not yet recruitingEarly Phase 1
Biomarker-Guided Mycophenolate Mofetil Elimination in Low-Risk Older Adult Kidney Transplant Recipients
Kidney Transplant Recipient
Recruiting
Non-Invasive Monitoring of Pediatric Kidney Transplant Recipients and Immunosuppression Personalization: an Open-labeled Multicenter Randomized Controlled Study
Pediatric Kidney Disease, Transplant;Failure,Kidney
Not yet recruitingPhase 2
(TNX-1500) in Kidney Transplant Recipients
Kidney Transplant, Kidney Transplant Failure and Rejection
RecruitingPhase 2
Expanding Liver Transplant Immunosuppression Minimization Via Everolimus
Liver Transplant
Active, not recruitingPhase 1
CD4^LVFOXP3 in Participants With IPEX
IPEX
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Michael E de Vera, MD principal investigator
University of Pittsburgh Medical Center
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Myfortic and CellCept in people with Immunosuppression, run by University of Pittsburgh at 1 site in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 7 inclusion and 9 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 9 Mar 2017. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 9 Mar 2017). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
GI Side Effects as Assessed by Gastro Intestinal Symptoms Rating Scale (GSRS) of Enteric-coated Mycophenolate Sodium vs Mycophenolate Mofetil (time frame: screening, 2, 6 and 12 weeks). The study lists 8 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 9 Mar 2017.