AzTrials
AzTrials

CalibrationNCT00339443

Calibration of Urine pH Strips for NCI Case-Control Studies on Bladder Cancer and Comparison of DNA Yields From Buccal Cells Collected Through Two Different Methods

An observational study of Calibration, run by National Cancer Institute (NCI) at 1 site in United States.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

We propose to conduct a pilot study among 30 volunteers from the Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics (DCEG) in order to: (1) select the urine pH strip that most closely correlates with urine pH measured by pH meter for the New England Bladder Cancer Study, (2) calibrate the urine pH strip that was used for… Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Any age
Conditions the study is for
Calibration
How many people
120 participants
Where
1 siteUnited States
Study dates
6 Nov 2001to 19 May 2010
Phase
Observational
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages Any age
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Child, Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Members of the DCEG staff.

Who cannot join

None listed.

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

United States1 site
  • National Cancer Institute (NCI), 9000 Rockville Pike

    Bethesda, Maryland, 20892

Other trials in United States

About this study

We propose to conduct a pilot study among 30 volunteers from the Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics (DCEG) in order to: (1) select the urine pH strip that most closely correlates with urine pH measured by pH meter for the New England Bladder Cancer Study, (2) calibrate the urine pH strip that was used for the Spanish Bladder Cancer Study against pH measured by a pH meter, and (3) compare the DNA yields from buccal cells obtained from two different methods: mouthwash vs toothbrush-rinse method. Information collected from this pilot study will be used to select and optimize the sample collection protocols in the New England Bladder Cancer Study. At the time of enrollment, study participants will be asked to provide information on age, gender, height, weight, consumption of antacids and calcium supplements, and whether they ate, drank or brushed their teeth in the last hour previous to the buccal cells ample collection. In addition, they will have to measure their urine pH with four different pH strips twice a day (early morning and before dinner) for a week and record the measurements in a diary. During the same week, they will be asked to collect two spot urine samples each day from Monday to Thursday (early morning and before dinner), and one more on Friday morning, and bring them into work in a cooler. Also, they will be asked to collect a continuous 24-hour urine sample during one of the three first days of the week. Urine samples will e picked up by lab personnel from BioReliance, and pH will be measured at their laboratory with the four pH strips again and with a pH meter. Buccal cells sample collection will be completed during the first and the last day of the urine sample collection period. The first day, study participants will be asked to provide a water rinse sample after brushing the inside of their cheeks with a toothbrush, and a week later they will be asked to provide a mouth wash sample consisting of two consecutive rinses with Scope mouthwash. All samples and questionnaire data will be unlinked from personal identifiers after the sample collection is completed. Participants will be compensated with $100 for the inconvenience of participating in this complex study and for their time.

Read the detailed description

We conducted a pilot study among 30 volunteers from the Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics (DCEG) in order to: (1) select the urine pH strip that most closely correlates with urine pH measured by pH meter for the New England Bladder Cancer Study, (2) calibrate the urine pH strip that was used for the Spanish Bladder Cancer Study against pH measured by a pH meter, and (3) compare the DNA yields from buccal cells obtained from two different methods: mouthwash vs toothbrush-rinse method. At the time of enrollment, study participants were asked to provide information on age, gender, height, weight, consumption of antacids and calcium supplements, and whether they ate, drank or brushed their teeth in the last hour previous to the buccal cells sample collection. In addition, they measured their urine pH with four different pH strips twice a day (early morning and before dinner) for a week and record the measurements in a diary. During the same week, they were asked to collect two spot urine samples each day from Monday to Thursday (early morning and before dinner), and one more on Friday morning, and bring them into work in a cooler. Also, they were asked to collect a continuous 24-hour urine sample during one of the three first days of the week. Urine samples were picked up by lab personnel from BioReliance, and pH was measured at their laboratory with the four pH strips again and with a pH meter. Buccal cells sample collection was completed during the first and the last day of the urine sample collection period. The first day, study participants were asked to provide a water rinse sample after brushing the inside of their cheeks with a toothbrush, and a week later they were asked to provide a mouth wash sample consisting of two consecutive rinses with Scope mouthwash. All samples and questionnaire data was unlinked from personal identifiers after the sample collection was completed. Participants were compensated with $100 for the inconvenience of participating in this complex study and for their time. Information collected from this pilot study has been used to prepare manuscripts, as well as select and optimize the sample collection protocols in the New England Bladder Cancer Study.

Conditions
Calibration
Keywords
Buccal Cells, Concordance, DNA Yields, pH Meter, Urine pH, Calibration

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted21 Jun 2006 (estimated)
  2. Study start6 Nov 2001
  3. Study completion19 May 2010

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Observational
Enrolment
120 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT00339443
Sponsor's protocol ID
999902040
Other IDs
02-C-N040
Status last verified
19 May 2010
First submitted
19 Jun 2006
Last updated
2 Jul 2017
Results posted
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

An observational study of Calibration, run by National Cancer Institute (NCI) at 1 site in United States.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 0 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 2 Jul 2017. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 2 Jul 2017.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in