AzTrials
AzTrials

Atrial FibrillationPhase 4APAF2NCT00340314

A Trial of Circumferential Pulmonary Vein Ablation (CPVA) Versus Antiarrhythmic Drug Therapy in for Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation (AF)

A Phase 4 study testing Circumferential Pulmonary Vein Ablation and Antiarrhythmic Drug Therapy in people with Atrial Fibrillation, run by IRCCS San Raffaele at 1 site in Italy.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Background: Circumferential pulmonary vein ablation (CPVA) has been safely and effectively performed for treating paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (PAF); however, its safety and efficacy, as compared with those of antiarrhythmic drug therapy (ADT), have never been formally assessed in a randomized controlled trial. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 70 years
Conditions the study is for
Atrial Fibrillation
What is being tested?
Circumferential Pulmonary Vein Ablation and Antiarrhythmic Drug Therapy
Type of treatment
Surgery or procedure
How many people
198 participants
Where
1 siteItaly
Study dates
Jan 2005to May 2006
Phase
Phase 4
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 70 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Age 18-70 years
  • History of symptomatic paroxysmal AF lasting more than 6 months. Paroxysms of AF are intended as recurrent self-terminating episodes lasting less than 7 days and occurring more than 2 times every month.

Who cannot join

  • Pregnancy
  • NYHA functional class III or IV
  • Left atrial size > 65 mm
  • Left ventricular (LV) ejection fraction < 35%
  • Contraindication to anticoagulation with warfarin
  • History of myocardial infarction within six months of the procedure
Show all 24Show fewer
  • Prior catheter or surgical ablation attempt for AF
  • Inability or unwillingness to provide written informed consent
  • Life expectancy less than 1 year
  • Significant comorbid conditions such as: cancer (not cured), end stage renal disease (creatinine clearance < 20 mL/h), severe chronic obstructive lung disease, cirrhosis, etc)
  • Anticipated cardiac surgery for congenital, valvular, aortic or coronary heart disease.
  • Presence of left atrial thrombus.
  • Prior antiarrhythmic drug therapy with amiodarone, sotalol and flecainide at optimal doses (target 200 mg, 240 mg, 200 mg daily respectively
  • AF burden < 2 episodes/month
  • WPW
  • Expected survival < 1 year
  • Contraindications for antiarrhythmics therapy including flecainide, sotalol or amiodarone not listed above:
  • LV hypertrophy (LV mass index > 125g/m2)
  • thyroid dysfunction (hyperthyroidism or uncontrolled hypothyroidism or thyroid cancer)
  • liver dysfunction (ALT or AST >2x the reference values)
  • Interstitial lung disease with DLCO<70% of predicted or severe asthma.
  • QT interval exceeding 400 msec
  • Symptomatic sinus node or atrioventricular node dysfunction unless a pacemaker had been implanted
  • Evidence of stress-induced myocardial ischemia

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Italy1 site
  • San Raffaele University Hospital

    Milan, 20132

Other trials in Italy

About this study

Official title: A Controlled Randomized Trial of Circumferential Pulmonary Vein Ablation Versus Antiarrhythmic Drug Therapy in Treating Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation. The Ablation for Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation (APAF2) Trial

Background: Circumferential pulmonary vein ablation (CPVA) has been safely and effectively performed for treating paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (PAF); however, its safety and efficacy, as compared with those of antiarrhythmic drug therapy (ADT), have never been formally assessed in a randomized controlled trial.

The Purpose of this study was to evaluate CPVA versus ADT in patients with PAF in a randomized controlled trial.

Read the detailed description

Antiarrhythmic drug therapy (ADT) is currently considered as first-line therapy in patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (AF).1 However antiarrhythmic drugs are frequently ineffective and can have serious potential adverse effects, thus often offsetting any advantage offered by the maintenance of sinus rhythm (SR).2,3 Data from our and other laboratories suggest that pulmonary vein ablation techniques may be a curative alternative for AF, obviating the need for ADT and/or anticoagulation in many patients.4-8 However, only preliminary and frequently non-randomized data exists for an evidence-based evaluation of catheter ablation as compared to conventional antiarrhythmic drug therapyADT.4,8 Thus, we conducted a controlled randomized trial (the Ablation for Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation [APAF] trial) to determine the long-term efficacy of circumferential pulmonary vein ablation (CPVA) in patients with paroxysmal AF as compared with ADT with flecainide, sotalol or amiodarone.

Methods: One hundred ninety-eight patients (age, 56±10 years) with PAF (duration, 6±5 years, mean AF episodes 3.4/month), were randomized to CPVA or to ADT with flecainide, sotalol or amiodarone. Ablation was randomly performed with the use of a standard or an irrigated tip catheter and with CARTO or NavX non fluoroscopic 3D systems guidance. Cardiac rhythm was assessed with daily transtelephonic transmissions over a 12 and 48 months follow-up. Crossovers to CPVA were allowed after 3 months of ADT.

Results: By Kaplan-Meier analysis, 86% of patients in the CPVA group and 22% in the ADT group were free from recurrent atrial tachyarrhythmias ([AT] P<0.001); a repeat ablation was performed in 9% of patients in the CPVA group for recurrent AF (6%) or atrial tachycardia (3%). At 1 year, 93% and 35% of the CPVA and ADT groups were AT-free while at 4 years only 72.7% patients assigned to RFA and 12.1% assigned to AADs reached the endpoint(p<0.001).Lower left ejection fraction, arterial hypertension and age independently predicted AF recurrences in the ADT group. CPVA was associated with a significant decrease in left atrial diameter (15±10%, P<0.01) and with fewer number of cardiovascular hospitalizations (p<0.01). Ablation with an irrigated tip catheter was more effective (P=0.03) with either the CARTO or NavX system (P=0.08). One transient ischemic attack and one pericardial effusion occurred in the CPVA group; side effects of ADT were reported in 23 patients.During the 4-year follow-up, 87 initially AADs patients required cross over to RFA with a steeper rate at 1 year (42 patients) and 19 of them progressed to persistent AF before switching. Considering repeat ablation and crossover, the overall success rate was 90% in RFA group and 80% in AAD group (p=0.0023, by log-rank test). New left AT developed in 9 patients requiring mapping and ablation in 7 patients. Quality of life was higher in the RFA group than in AAD group for all subscale scores (p<0.001) Conclusions: Compared to ADT, CPVA can safely and effectively cure PAF in many patients at one-year follow-up and this benefit is extended to 4 years.

Being tested
Circumferential Pulmonary Vein Ablation, Antiarrhythmic Drug Therapy
Keywords
symptomatic, paroxysmal, atrial fibrillation
Medical subject headings
Atrial Fibrillation

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Circumferential Pulmonary Vein AblationProcedure or surgery

  • Antiarrhythmic Drug TherapyDrug

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. The primary end point was freedom from recurrent atrial tachyarrhythmias ([AT], both AF and regular atrial tachycardia) during a 12 and 48 months follow-up . The first analysis was scheduled to be performed after the last enrolled patient complete.

Secondary outcomes (11)
  1. Presence of SR during 1-month intervals

  2. Percent of patients totally free of AF

  3. Number of cardioversions

  4. LV function

  5. Incidence of cardiovascular hospitalization

  6. Overall morbidity

  7. Left atrial size and function

  8. Thromboembolic and bleeding complications

  9. Efficacy and safety of two 3D mapping systems

  10. Efficacy and safety of two ablation catheters

  11. Procedure duration, length of hospital stay

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted21 Jun 2006 (estimated)
  2. Study startJan 2005
  3. Study completionMay 2006

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 4
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
198 participants
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT00340314
Sponsor's protocol ID
APAF/02
Acronym
APAF2
Status last verified
May 2006
First submitted
19 Jun 2006
Last updated
28 Jul 2010
Results posted
No

Publications

  • Pappone C, Vicedomini G, Augello G, Manguso F, Saviano M, Baldi M, Petretta A, Giannelli L, Calovic Z, Guluta V, Tavazzi L, Santinelli V. Radiofrequency catheter ablation and antiarrhythmic drug therapy: a prospective, randomized, 4-year follow-up trial: the APAF study. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2011 Dec;4(6):808-14. doi: 10.1161/CIRCEP.111.966408. Epub 2011 Sep 23.

    PubMed 21946315
  • Pappone C, Augello G, Sala S, Gugliotta F, Vicedomini G, Gulletta S, Paglino G, Mazzone P, Sora N, Greiss I, Santagostino A, LiVolsi L, Pappone N, Radinovic A, Manguso F, Santinelli V. A randomized trial of circumferential pulmonary vein ablation versus antiarrhythmic drug therapy in paroxysmal atrial fibrillation: the APAF Study. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2006 Dec 5;48(11):2340-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2006.08.037. Epub 2006 Oct 16.

    PubMed 17161267

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 4 study testing Circumferential Pulmonary Vein Ablation and Antiarrhythmic Drug Therapy in people with Atrial Fibrillation, run by IRCCS San Raffaele at 1 site in Italy.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 24 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 28 Jul 2010. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Italy. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this phase mean?

Phase 4 studies take place after a treatment is approved, to learn more about its long-term benefits and risks in everyday use.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

The primary end point was freedom from recurrent atrial tachyarrhythmias ([AT], both AF and regular atrial tachycardia) during a 12 and 48 months follow-up . The first analysis was scheduled to be performed after the last enrolled patient complete.. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT00340314, which also lists 2 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 28 Jul 2010.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in