AzTrials
AzTrials

Cervical NeoplasiaNCT00342173

Costa Rican Natural History Study of HPV and Cervical Neoplasia

An observational study of Cervical Neoplasia, run by National Cancer Institute (NCI) at 1 site in Costa Rica.

Terminated

Stopped early. The study ended before it was planned to and will not resume.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

A population-based study was initiated in Costa Rica in June 1993 to investigate the natural history of human papillomaviruses (HPV) and cervical neoplasia. Over a period of 18 months, ending in December 1994, 10,080 women were recruited into our study, after informed consent was obtained. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 100 years, women only
Conditions the study is for
Cervical Neoplasia
How many people
11,545 participants
Where
1 siteCosta Rica
Study dates
20 May 1999to 12 Mar 2012
Phase
Observational
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 100 years
  • Women only
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Study population: A population-based study was initiated in Costa Rica in June 1993 to investigate the natural history of human papillomaviruses (HPV) and cervical neoplasia. Over a period of 18 months, ending in December 1994, 10,080 women were recruited into our study, after informed consent was obtained. Three distinct groups of women of approximately equal size (about 3,000 women each) exist within our longitudinal cohort. The first group consists of women who at enrollment had evidence of low-grade cervical lesions (LSIL) or equivocal lesions and a sample of the remaining cohort members. The second group consists of women who were cytologically normal at enrollment but randomly selected for active follow-up. The final group consists of the remaining women in our cohort (all cytologyically normal at enrollment).

Who may be able to join

  • Must be between the ages of 45 to 70 years.
  • Women who do not have a final diagnosis of HSIL.

Who cannot join

None listed.

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Costa Rica1 site
  • Costa Rican Social Security Administration

    Tres Ríos

Other trials in Costa Rica

About this study

A population-based study was initiated in Costa Rica in June 1993 to investigate the natural history of human papillomaviruses (HPV) and cervical neoplasia. Over a period of 18 months, ending in December 1994, 10,080 women were recruited into our study, after informed consent was obtained. At the initial recruitment visit, all women were administered a brief risk factor questionnaire, had 15ml of blood collected and, if sexually active, were given a pelvic examination. At the time of the pelvic examination, a Pap smear was collected, as were additional cervical cells which were then used for additional monolayer smears (ThinPrep) and for human papillomavirus and other testing. Pictures of the cervix, known as cervigrams, were also taken as a third screening test. Based on these screening tests, women were referred to colposcopy, at which time a more detailed risk factor questionnaire was administered, additional cervical cells and blood (15ml) were collected, and histological specimens were obtained, if indicated by the colposcopy. Women diagnosed with a high-grade cervical lesion (HSIL) or cervical cancer were treated by Social Security Administration clinicians using standard local protocols.

Women without evidence of HSIL or cancer at enrollment comprise the group of subjects who have been followed as part of our longitudinal study. Three distinct groups of women of approximately equal size (about 3,000 women each) exist within our longitudinal cohort. The first group consists of women who at enrollment had evidence of low-grade cervical lesions (LSIL) or equivocal lesions and a sample of the remaining cohort members. This group is being followed actively at 6-12 month intervals through their seventh anniversary in the cohort. The second group consists of women who were cytologically normal at enrollment but randomly selected for active follow-up. This second group will be seen once after enrollment, at their fifth anniversary in the cohort. Women in this group with evidence of LSIL at the fifth anniversary visit will be added to the first group described above and followed at 6-month intervals. The final group consists of the remaining women in our cohort (all cytologically normal at enrollment). These women are being followed passively via linkage to the cytology and tumor registries in Cost Rica.

Read more

Clinical visits conducted during follow-up consist of a brief personal interview that collects information on exposures since enrollment, the collection of 15ml blood, and a pelvic examination. Pap smear is prepared during the pelvic examination, and additional cervical specimens are collected and used to prepare a monolayer smear (ThinPrep) and for human papillomavirus and other testing. Similar to the enrollment visit, cervigrams are also collected from each participant at the time of their follow-up visits.

During follow-up, women with any evidence of progression to HSIL or cancer (by Pap smear, ThinPrep, cervicography, or by visual inspection) are referred to colposcopy, censored from the study, and treated by Social Security Administration clinicians using standard local protocols.

Read the detailed description

A population-based study was initiated in Costa Rica in June 1993 to investigate the natural history of human papillomaviruses (HPV) and cervical neoplasia. Over a period of 18 months, ending in December 1994, 10,080 women were recruited into our study, after informed consent was obtained. At the initial recruitment visit, all women were administered a brief risk factor questionnaire, had 15ml of blood collected and, if sexually active, were given a pelvic examination. At the time of the pelvic examination, a Pap smear was collected, as were additional cervical cells which were then used for additional monolayer smears (ThinPrep) and for human papillomavirus and other testing. Pictures of the cervix, known as cervigrams, were also taken as a third screening test. Based on these screening tests, women were referred to colposcopy, at which time a more detailed risk factor questionnaire was administered, additional cervical cells and blood (15ml) were collected, and histological specimens were obtained, if indicated by the colposcopy. Women diagnosed with a high-grade cervical lesion (HSIL) or cervical cancers were treated by Social Security Administration clinicians using standard local protocols.

Women without evidence of HSIL or cancer at enrollment comprise the group of subjects who were followed as part of our longitudinal study. Three distinct groups of women of approximately equal size (about 3,000 women each) exist within our longitudinal cohort. The first group consists of women who at enrollment had evidence of low-grade cervical lesions (LSIL) or equivocal lesions and a sample of the remaining cohort members. This group was followed actively at 6-12 month intervals through their seventh anniversary in the cohort. The second group consists of women who were cytologically normal at enrollment but randomly selected for active follow-up. This second group was seen once after enrollment, close to fifth anniversary in the cohort. Women in this group with evidence of LSIL at the fifth anniversary visit were added to the first group described above and followed at 6-month intervals. The final group consists of the remaining women in our cohort (all cytologically normal at enrollment). These women were followed passively via linkage to the cytology and tumor registries in Costa Rica.

Clinical visits conducted during follow-up consisted of a brief personal interview that collects information on exposures since enrollment, the collection of 15ml blood, and a pelvic examination. A Pap smear was prepared during the pelvic examination, and additional cervical specimens were collected and used to prepare a monolayer smear (ThinPrep) and for human papillomavirus and other testing. Similar to the enrollment visit, cervigrams were also collected from each participant at the time of their follow-up visits.

During follow-up, women with any evidence of progression to HSIL or cancer (by Pap smear, ThinPrep, cervicography, or by visual inspection) were referred to colposcopy, censored from the study, and treated by Social Security Administration clinicians using standard local protocols.

Keywords
Cervix, Natural History, Neoplasia, HPV, Costa Rica
Medical subject headings
Neoplasms

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

Study groups in NCT00342173
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Women in Costa RicaExamining the natural history of HPV and cervical neoplasia in Costa Rican women.

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Natural History of human papillomaviruses (HPV) and cervical neoplasia

    Cervical precancer and cancer

    Measured: 7-year follow-up

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted21 Jun 2006 (estimated)
  2. Study start20 May 1999
  3. Primary completion12 Mar 2012
  4. Study completion12 Mar 2012

Why it stopped: classified by the IRB as non human subjects research

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Observational
Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrolment
11,545 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT00342173
Sponsor's protocol ID
999999030
Other IDs
OH99-C-N030
Status last verified
Mar 2020
First submitted
19 Jun 2006
Last updated
16 Mar 2020
Results posted
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No

Publications

  • Campos NG, Burger EA, Sy S, Sharma M, Schiffman M, Rodriguez AC, Hildesheim A, Herrero R, Kim JJ. An updated natural history model of cervical cancer: derivation of model parameters. Am J Epidemiol. 2014 Sep 1;180(5):545-55. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwu159. Epub 2014 Jul 31.

    PubMed 25081182

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

An observational study of Cervical Neoplasia, run by National Cancer Institute (NCI) at 1 site in Costa Rica.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 0 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: stopped early, as of the sponsor's last update on 16 Mar 2020. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Costa Rica. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study was stopped early (reason given: classified by the IRB as non human subjects research). Results are not available in the source record.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Natural History of human papillomaviruses (HPV) and cervical neoplasia (time frame: 7-year follow-up). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT00342173, which also lists 1 linked publication.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 16 Mar 2020.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in