Alzheimer's DiseaseREFLECT-2NCT00348309
Rosiglitazone (Extended Release Tablets) As Adjunctive Therapy For Subjects With Mild To Moderate Alzheimer's Disease
A study testing Rosiglitazone Extended Release 2mg, Rosiglitazone Extended Release 8mg and Donepezil in people with Alzheimer's Disease, run by GlaxoSmithKline at 249 sites in 19 countries.
Trial summary
Rosiglitazone (RSG) has been tested in clinical studies and is approved by the FDA as a treatment for type II diabetes mellitus, a disease that occurs when the body is unable to effectively use glucose. RSG XR, the investigational drug used in this study, is an extended-release form of RSG. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 50 to 90 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Alzheimer's Disease
- What is being tested?
- Rosiglitazone Extended Release 2mg, Rosiglitazone Extended Release 8mg and Donepezil
- Could I receive a placebo?
- Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
- How many people
- 1,496 participants
- Where
- 249 sitesin 19 countries
- Study dates
- 6 Jul 2006to 28 Jan 2009
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 50 to 90 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- A subject will be eligible for inclusion in this study only if all of the following criteria apply:
- Male or female subject with a clinical diagnosis of probable Alzheimer's disease in accordance with NINCDS-ADRDA criteria.
- (Note: National Institute of Neurological and Communicative Disorders and Stroke (NINCDS) and Alzheimer's Disease and Related Disorders Association (ADRDA).)
- Subject has mild to moderate Alzheimer's disease as defined by a MMSE score 10 to 26 inclusive at Screening.
- Hachinski Ischemia Score ≤ 4 at Screening.
- Age ≥50 and ≤90 years.
Show all 20Show fewer
- At least 6 months of ongoing donepezil therapy for Alzheimer's disease, with stable dosing for at least the last 2 months (and with no intent to change for the duration of the study).
- Current use of medication is in accordance with the criteria listed in Table 2 (Permitted Medications,).
- Female subjects must be post-menopausal (i.e. >1 year without menstrual period), surgically sterile, or agree to use adequate method of contraception for the duration of the study. Female subjects who are pre-menopausal or who have been post-menopausal for <1 year must undertake pregnancy testing (urine test) at Visit 1, which must be negative.
- Brain CT or MRI scan performed within the past 12 months or at Screening, showing no evidence of any other potential cause of dementia other than Alzheimer's disease.
- (Note: Questionable CT or MRI scans should be discussed with the medical monitor, using central imaging guidelines.)
- Neurological exam without focal changes (excluding changes attributable to AD or peripheral trauma).
- Subject has the ability to comply with procedures for cognitive and other testing.
- Subject lives with (or has substantial periods of contact with) a regular caregiver who is willing to attend all visits, oversee the subject's compliance with protocol-specified procedures and study medication, and report on subject's status.
- Note: A non-cohabiting caregiver must spend sufficient time with the subject so that, in the opinion of the Investigator, the caregiver can reliably assess cognitive function, activities and behavior, and report on the subject's compliance and health. As caregiver time spent with a potential subject is anticipated to be highly variable across countries and cultures, GSK will consider a variety of different measures by which this stipulation may be met, and GSK should be consulted if adequacy of a caregiver situation is in doubt. However, as guidance, the ability for a caregiver to meet his/her expected responsibilities for this study would normally be possible when the caregiver spends no less than 10 hours per week with the subject, divided over multiple days.)
- Subject has provided full written informed consent prior to the performance of any protocol-specified procedure; or if unable to provide informed consent due to cognitive status, full written informed consent on behalf of the subject has been provided by a legally acceptable representative.
- (Note: Consent by legally acceptable representative is allowed where this is in accordance with local laws, regulations and ethics committee policy.)
- Caregiver has provided full written informed consent on his/her own behalf prior to the performance of any protocol-specified procedure.
- Subjects considered for enrolment must have a QTc (either QTc B (Bazett's correction) or QTc F (Fridericia's correction)) <450msec at Visit 1, with the exception of subjects with bundle branch block (for whom either QTc B or QTc F must be <480msec).
- (Note: For the purposes of these criteria, QTc B is defined as (QT interval [msec]) / (square root of RR interval [seconds]); and QTc F is defined as (QT interval [msec]) / (cube root of RR interval [seconds]).)
Who cannot join
- A subject will not be eligible for inclusion in this study if any of the following criteria apply:
- Diagnosis of possible, probable, or definite vascular dementia in accordance with NINDS-AIREN criteria.
- (Note: National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NINDS) and Association Internationale pour la Recherche et l'Enseignement en Neurosciences (AIREN).)
- History or evidence of any other CNS disorder that could be interpreted as a cause of dementia: e.g. cerebrovascular disease (stroke, hemorrhage), structural abnormality, epilepsy, infectious or inflammatory/demyelinating CNS conditions, Parkinson's disease.
- Evidence of the following disorders: current vitamin B12 deficiency, positive syphilis serology, or active thyroid dysfunction (particularly that suggestive of hypothyroidism), including abnormally high or low serum levels of thyroid stimulating hormone (TSH) that are clinically significant in the opinion of the investigator.
- (Note: Testing is required for each parameter only when no result is available from previous 12 months.)
Show all 30Show fewer
- History of Type 1 diabetes mellitus or secondary diabetes mellitus.
- Type 2 diabetes mellitus where the subject is being treated with insulin, a PPARγ agonist, or an insulin secretagogue (e.g. a sulfonylurea or glitinide).
- Any patient with an HbA1c ≥8.5%. (See Section 6.3.7.4 for Safety Measures for Enrolled Subjects with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus.)
- History or clinical/investigational evidence of congestive heart failure defined by the New York Heart Association criteria (Class I to IV cardiac status;).
- History of cardiovascular event within the last 6 months (i.e. intervention, percutaneous coronary intervention, vascular surgery, acute coronary syndrome [non Q-wave myocardial infarction, Q-wave myocardial infarction, unstable angina] or significant arrhythmia; or major intervention (e.g. cardiac surgery or angiography plus stenting) scheduled).
- History of significant psychiatric illness such as schizophrenia or bipolar affective disorder that in the opinion of the Investigator would interfere with participation in the study, major depressive disorder (according to DSM-IV) in the past year, or current active depression requiring initiation of treatment.
- (Note: If not currently treated, but active depression is suspected, the Cornell Scale for Depression in Dementia (CSDD) can be used by the Investigator as a guide for deciding whether a prospective subject requires treatment. If the subject has a CSDD score >7, the Investigator should decide if the subject has depression in need of prescribed medication, and a CSDD >12 is considered a strong indicator that treatment is needed. Subjects will be allowed to re-screen after their depression has been adequately managed for >3 months.)
- History or presence of gastro-intestinal, hepatic, or renal disease or other condition known to interfere with the absorption, distribution, metabolism, or excretion of drugs, or any other clinically relevant abnormality, medical or psychiatric condition, which, in the opinion of the Investigator, makes the subject unsuitable for inclusion in the study.
- Clinically significant peripheral edema at the time of screening.
- Current or recent drug or alcohol abuse or dependence (defined by DSM-IV criteria for substance-related disorders), or recent or remote history of the same if that could be a contributing factor to the dementia.
- Systolic blood pressure >165 or <90 mmHg or diastolic blood pressure >95 or <60 mmHg at the time of screening.
- Clinically significant anemia (i.e. hemoglobin <11 g/dL for males or <10 g/dL for females) or presence of hemoglobinopathies which would prevent accurate assessment of HbA1c.
- Abnormal kidney function tests (>1.5 the upper limit of normal (ULN)).
- ALT, AST, or alkaline phosphatase values >2.5 times the ULN, total bilirubin values >1.5 times the ULN, or history of severe hepatobiliary disease (e.g. hepatitis B or C, or cirrhosis, Child-Pugh Class B/C).
- (Note: For subjects with a diagnosis of Gilberts Syndrome and an isolated increase in total bilirubin >1.5 ULN, fractionation should be performed. If all of the following conditions are met, the patient may enter or remain in the study, even if total bilirubin >1.5 ULN:
- an elevated unconjugated (indirect) bilirubin;
- the percentage of direct bilirubin <35%;
- ALT, AST, and alkaline phosphatase <2.5 ULN if subject is in screening (<2.0 ULN for Canadian subjects only), or ≤3 ULN if subject is already randomized into the study)
- History of a bone marrow transplant.
- Subject is unable (with assistance, if appropriate) to take study medication as prescribed throughout the study or is at risk of non-compliance with study medication or procedures.
- Subject is an immediate family member or employee of the participating Investigator, of any of the participating site staff, or of GSK.
- In France, a subject is neither affiliated with nor a beneficiary of a social security category.
- The French subject has participated in any study using an investigational drug during the previous 30 days or 5 half-lives (whichever is longer).
- Cognitive tasks prescribed for cognitive rehabilitation and performed under medical supervision are prohibited for 6 months prior to Screening, as well as for the duration of the study.
Trial locations and contacts
249 sites in 19 countries.
249 sites in 19 countries
Germany47 sites
GSK Investigational Site
Achim, Lower Saxony, 28832
GSK Investigational Site
Bad Honnef, North Rhine-Westphalia, 53604
GSK Investigational Site
Baesweiler, North Rhine-Westphalia, 52499
GSK Investigational Site
Bergisch Gladbach, North Rhine-Westphalia, 51465
GSK Investigational Site
Böblingen, Baden-Wurttemberg, 71034
GSK Investigational Site
Bochum, North Rhine-Westphalia, 44791
GSK Investigational Site
Bochum, North Rhine-Westphalia, 44805
GSK Investigational Site
Bochum, North Rhine-Westphalia, 44809
GSK Investigational Site
Bochum, North Rhine-Westphalia, 44869
GSK Investigational Site
Bochum, North Rhine-Westphalia, 44892
GSK Investigational Site
Bockhorn, Lower Saxony, 26345
GSK Investigational Site
Cologne, North Rhine-Westphalia, 50767
GSK Investigational Site
Cologne, North Rhine-Westphalia, 51069
GSK Investigational Site
Duisburg, North Rhine-Westphalia, 47051
GSK Investigational Site
Düren, North Rhine-Westphalia, 52349
GSK Investigational Site
Essen, North Rhine-Westphalia, 45138
GSK Investigational Site
Ganderkesee, Lower Saxony, 27777
GSK Investigational Site
Göttingen, Lower Saxony, 37075
GSK Investigational Site
Hamburg, 20249
GSK Investigational Site
Hamburg, 21149
GSK Investigational Site
Hamburg, 22083
GSK Investigational Site
Hamburg, 22143
GSK Investigational Site
Hanover, Lower Saxony, 30559
GSK Investigational Site
Hattingen, North Rhine-Westphalia, 45525
GSK Investigational Site
Hildesheim, Lower Saxony, 31134
GSK Investigational Site
Hüttenberg, Hesse, 35625
GSK Investigational Site
Jülich, North Rhine-Westphalia, 52428
GSK Investigational Site
Krefeld, North Rhine-Westphalia, 47800
GSK Investigational Site
Lüneburg, Lower Saxony, 21335
GSK Investigational Site
Munich, Bavaria, 80331
GSK Investigational Site
Munich, Bavaria, 80333
GSK Investigational Site
Munich, Bavaria, 80336
GSK Investigational Site
Munich, Bavaria, 81377
GSK Investigational Site
Munich, Bavaria, 81667
GSK Investigational Site
Neuburg an der Donau, Bavaria, 86633
GSK Investigational Site
Nuremberg, Bavaria, 90402
GSK Investigational Site
Nuremberg, Bavaria, 90403
GSK Investigational Site
Ostfildern, Baden-Wurttemberg, 73760
GSK Investigational Site
Regensburg, Bavaria, 93053
GSK Investigational Site
Remscheid, North Rhine-Westphalia, 42853
GSK Investigational Site
Schwerin, Mecklenburg-Vorpommern, 19053
GSK Investigational Site
Schwerin, Mecklenburg-Vorpommern, 19055
GSK Investigational Site
Siegen, North Rhine-Westphalia, 57072
GSK Investigational Site
Stuttgart, Baden-Wurttemberg, 70178
GSK Investigational Site
Ulm, Baden-Wurttemberg, 89073
GSK Investigational Site
Westerstede, Lower Saxony, 26655
GSK Investigational Site
Würzburg, Bavaria, 97070
United States41 sites
GSK Investigational Site
Albany, New York, 12205
GSK Investigational Site
Austin, Texas, 78757
GSK Investigational Site
Baltimore, Maryland, 21224
GSK Investigational Site
Bennington, Vermont, 05201
GSK Investigational Site
Brooklyn, New York, 11235
GSK Investigational Site
Delray Beach, Florida, 33445
GSK Investigational Site
Denver, Colorado, 80212
GSK Investigational Site
Durham, North Carolina, 27705
GSK Investigational Site
Fort Wayne, Indiana, 46805
GSK Investigational Site
Fresno, California, 93720
GSK Investigational Site
Glen Burnie, Maryland, 21061
GSK Investigational Site
Hallandale, Florida, 33009
GSK Investigational Site
Hoffman Estates, Illinois, 60194
GSK Investigational Site
Houston, Texas, 77030
GSK Investigational Site
Indianapolis, Indiana, 46202
GSK Investigational Site
Lebanon, New Hampshire, 03756
GSK Investigational Site
Litchfield Park, Arizona, 85340
GSK Investigational Site
Little Rock, Arkansas, 72205
GSK Investigational Site
Miami, Florida, 33143
GSK Investigational Site
Morristown, New Jersey, 07960
GSK Investigational Site
Nashville, Tennessee, 37203
GSK Investigational Site
New Haven, Connecticut, 06510
GSK Investigational Site
New York, New York, 10021
GSK Investigational Site
Nutley, New Jersey, 07110
GSK Investigational Site
Phoenix, Arizona, 85004
GSK Investigational Site
Phoenix, Arizona, 85006
GSK Investigational Site
Phoenix, Arizona, 85050
GSK Investigational Site
Portland, Oregon, 97239
GSK Investigational Site
Princeton, New Jersey, 08540
GSK Investigational Site
Providence, Rhode Island, 02906
GSK Investigational Site
Raleigh, North Carolina, 27607
GSK Investigational Site
Rancho Mirage, California, 92270
GSK Investigational Site
Rockville, Maryland, 20852
GSK Investigational Site
Sacramento, California, 95816
GSK Investigational Site
Saint Paul, Minnesota, 55101
GSK Investigational Site
Sarasota, Florida, 34233
GSK Investigational Site
Sherman Oaks, California, 91403
GSK Investigational Site
South Ogden, Utah, 84403
GSK Investigational Site
St. Petersburg, Florida, 33701
GSK Investigational Site
Stratford, New Jersey, 08084
GSK Investigational Site
West Palm Beach, Florida, 33407
France34 sites
GSK Investigational Site
Angoulême, 16000
GSK Investigational Site
Arcachon, 33120
GSK Investigational Site
Avignon, 84000
GSK Investigational Site
Bourg-en-Bresse, 01012
GSK Investigational Site
Caen, 14033
GSK Investigational Site
Dijon, 21000
GSK Investigational Site
Issy-les-Moulineaux, 92130
GSK Investigational Site
Ivry, 94206
GSK Investigational Site
Luynes, 37230
GSK Investigational Site
Lyon, 69006
GSK Investigational Site
Marseille, 13008
GSK Investigational Site
Marseille, 13009
GSK Investigational Site
Metz, 57038
GSK Investigational Site
Montpellier, 34080
GSK Investigational Site
Nantes, 44000
GSK Investigational Site
Nantes, 44093
GSK Investigational Site
Nantes, 44200
GSK Investigational Site
Nice, 06002
GSK Investigational Site
Paris, 75012
GSK Investigational Site
Paris, 75013
GSK Investigational Site
Paris, 75018
GSK Investigational Site
Pau, 64000
GSK Investigational Site
Pessac, 33604
GSK Investigational Site
Reims, 51100
GSK Investigational Site
Rennes, 35000
GSK Investigational Site
Rodez, 12000
GSK Investigational Site
Saint-Etienne, 42100
GSK Investigational Site
Saint-Jean-de-Luz, 64500
GSK Investigational Site
Saint-Nicolas-de-Port, 54210
GSK Investigational Site
Saint-Ouen-la-Rouërie, 35460
GSK Investigational Site
Tinténiac, 35190
GSK Investigational Site
Tours, 37100
GSK Investigational Site
Verny, 57420
GSK Investigational Site
Vichy, 03200
Japan20 sites
GSK Investigational Site
Aichi, 451-0052
GSK Investigational Site
Aichi, 455-8530
GSK Investigational Site
Fukuoka, 813-8588
GSK Investigational Site
Fukuoka, 819-0165
GSK Investigational Site
Gunma, 375-0017
GSK Investigational Site
Hiroshima, 733-0864
GSK Investigational Site
Hokkaido, 005-0853
GSK Investigational Site
Hokkaido, 080-2470
GSK Investigational Site
Hyōgo, 672-8043
GSK Investigational Site
Ibaraki, 300-0053
GSK Investigational Site
Kagawa, 761-8024
GSK Investigational Site
Kanagawa, 231-0023
GSK Investigational Site
Kanagawa, 238-0042
GSK Investigational Site
Kochi, 780-0842
GSK Investigational Site
Kumamoto, 861-8002
GSK Investigational Site
Kyoto, 607-8062
GSK Investigational Site
Nagano, 399-8695
GSK Investigational Site
Osaka, 567-0011
GSK Investigational Site
Osaka, 569-1041
GSK Investigational Site
Tokyo, 193-0998
Italy19 sites
GSK Investigational Site
Ancona, The Marches, 60020
GSK Investigational Site
Arezzo, Tuscany, 52100
GSK Investigational Site
Bari, Apulia, 70124
GSK Investigational Site
Bologna, Emilia-Romagna, 40138
GSK Investigational Site
Brescia, Lombardy, 25123
GSK Investigational Site
Brescia, Lombardy, 25125
GSK Investigational Site
Chieti Scalo, Abruzzo, 66013
GSK Investigational Site
Florence, Tuscany, 50134
GSK Investigational Site
Milan, Lombardy, 20122
GSK Investigational Site
Milan, Lombardy, 20127
GSK Investigational Site
Naples, Campania, 80131
GSK Investigational Site
Pavia, Lombardy, 27100
GSK Investigational Site
Pisa, Tuscany, 56126
GSK Investigational Site
Rho, Lombardy, 20017
GSK Investigational Site
Rome, Lazio, 00148
GSK Investigational Site
Rome, Lazio, 00163
GSK Investigational Site
Rome, Lazio, 00186
GSK Investigational Site
San Felice A Cancello Caserta, Campania, 81027
GSK Investigational Site
Verona, Veneto, 37100
Canada17 sites
GSK Investigational Site
Barrie, Ontario, L4M 4S5
GSK Investigational Site
Calgary, Alberta, T2N 4N1
GSK Investigational Site
Charlottetown, Prince Edward Island, C1A 5Y8
GSK Investigational Site
Greenfield Park, Quebec, J4V 2J2
GSK Investigational Site
Kingston, Ontario, K7L 4X3
GSK Investigational Site
Medicine Hat, Alberta, T1A 4C2
GSK Investigational Site
Moncton, New Brunswick, E1C 4B7
GSK Investigational Site
Montreal, Quebec, H1T 2M4
GSK Investigational Site
Montreal, Quebec, H4H 1R3
GSK Investigational Site
Peterborough, Ontario, K9H 2P4
GSK Investigational Site
Québec, G1R 3X5
GSK Investigational Site
Regina, Saskatchewan, S4T 1A5
GSK Investigational Site
Sherbrooke, Quebec, J1H 1Z1
GSK Investigational Site
Toronto, Ontario, M5T 2S8
GSK Investigational Site
Toronto, Ontario, M6M 3Z5
GSK Investigational Site
Victoria, British Columbia, V8T 5G1
GSK Investigational Site
Whitby, Ontario, L1N 5S9
Spain15 sites
GSK Investigational Site
A Coruña, 15006
GSK Investigational Site
Burgos, 09006
GSK Investigational Site
Castellon, 12004
GSK Investigational Site
Elche (Alicante), 03202
GSK Investigational Site
Galdakano, 48960
GSK Investigational Site
Girona, 17190
GSK Investigational Site
Granada, 18013
GSK Investigational Site
Madrid, 28006
GSK Investigational Site
Madrid, 28040
GSK Investigational Site
Madrid, 28046
GSK Investigational Site
Málaga, 29071
GSK Investigational Site
Murcia, 30120
GSK Investigational Site
Pamplona, 31008
GSK Investigational Site
San Sebastián, 20014
GSK Investigational Site
Valencia, 46010
Argentina9 sites
GSK Investigational Site
Buenos Aires, C1425CDC
GSK Investigational Site
Ciudad Autónoma de Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, C1192AAW
GSK Investigational Site
Ciudad Autónoma de Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, C1419HDN
GSK Investigational Site
Ciudad de Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, C1431FWO
GSK Investigational Site
Córdoba, Córdoba Province, 5000
GSK Investigational Site
Córdoba, Córdoba Province, X5004AOA
GSK Investigational Site
Córdoba, Córdoba Province, x5009bin
GSK Investigational Site
Godoy Cruz, Mendoza Province, M5504FMI
GSK Investigational Site
Mendoza, CPM5500HIF
India8 sites
GSK Investigational Site
Bangalore, 560 054
GSK Investigational Site
Bangalore, 560034
GSK Investigational Site
Hyderabad, 500 034
GSK Investigational Site
Mumbai, 400010
GSK Investigational Site
Nagpur, 440010
GSK Investigational Site
New Delhi, 110002
GSK Investigational Site
Pune, 411004
GSK Investigational Site
Varanasi, 221005
Poland7 sites
GSK Investigational Site
Bydgoszcz, 85-096
GSK Investigational Site
Katowice, 40-752
GSK Investigational Site
Lodz, 91-348
GSK Investigational Site
Mosina, 62-050
GSK Investigational Site
Poznan, 61-298
GSK Investigational Site
Sopot, 81-824
GSK Investigational Site
Warsaw, 02-507
Austria6 sites
GSK Investigational Site
Hall in Tirol, A-6060
GSK Investigational Site
Innsbruck, A-6020
GSK Investigational Site
Vienna, 1010
GSK Investigational Site
Vienna, 1030
GSK Investigational Site
Vienna, A-1130
GSK Investigational Site
Vienna, A-1220
Czechia5 sites
GSK Investigational Site
Ostrava, 702 00
GSK Investigational Site
Prague, 10000
GSK Investigational Site
Prague, 120 00
GSK Investigational Site
Prague, 150 18
GSK Investigational Site
Prague, 170 00
Chile4 sites
GSK Investigational Site
Providencia / Santiago, Región Metro de Santiago, 7500710
GSK Investigational Site
Puente Alto - Santiago, Región Metro de Santiago, 8207257
GSK Investigational Site
Santiago, Región Metro de Santiago, 7560356
GSK Investigational Site
Viña del Mar, Valparaiso, 252-0997
Greece4 sites
GSK Investigational Site
Athens, 115 21
GSK Investigational Site
Athens, 151 23
GSK Investigational Site
Melíssia, 151 27
GSK Investigational Site
Thessaloniki, 57010
Mexico4 sites
GSK Investigational Site
México, 14000
GSK Investigational Site
Monterrey, Nuevo León, 64660
GSK Investigational Site
Monterrey, Nuevo León, 64710
GSK Investigational Site
Saltillo, Coahuila, 25000
Brazil3 sites
GSK Investigational Site
Belo Horizonte, 30130-110
GSK Investigational Site
Ribeirão Preto, 14048-900
GSK Investigational Site
São Paulo, 040023-900
Hungary3 sites
GSK Investigational Site
Debrecen, 4043
GSK Investigational Site
Győr, 9024
GSK Investigational Site
Szeged, 6725
Portugal2 sites
GSK Investigational Site
Coimbra, 3000-548
GSK Investigational Site
Lisbon, 1649-035
About this study
Official title: A 54-week, Double-blind, Randomized, Placebo-controlled, Parallel-group Study to Investigate the Effects of Rosiglitazone (Extended Release Tablets) as Adjunctive Therapy to Donepezil on Cognition and Overall Clinical Response in APOE ε4-stratified Subjects With Mild to Moderate Alzheimer's Disease.
Rosiglitazone (RSG) has been tested in clinical studies and is approved by the FDA as a treatment for type II diabetes mellitus, a disease that occurs when the body is unable to effectively use glucose. RSG XR, the investigational drug used in this study, is an extended-release form of RSG.
This study tests whether RSG XR safely provides clinical benefit to people with mild to moderate Alzheimer's disease (AD) when combined with the currently approved AD medication, Aricept (donepezil). RSG XR is a new approach to AD therapy and this study tests a new way to treat AD by testing whether one's genetic makeup affects their response to the study drug. Clinical data suggesting that RSG may benefit AD patients was first seen in a small study performed at the University of Washington and then from a larger GSK study conducted in Europe and New Zealand. In the first study, subjects receiving RSG once daily for 6 months scored significantly better on 3 tests of memory and thought than those who did not receive RSG. In the GSK study, those that appeared to benefit most from treatment with RSG XR had a specific genetic pattern. They did not have the gene that caused them to produce the protein apolipoprotein E e4 (APOE e4). Subjects who have the APOE e4 gene may have two copies, one from each parent, or they may have only one APOE e4 gene meaning that they inherited either the APOE e2 or APOE e3 version of the gene, instead of APOE e4, from one of their parents. Subjects with one copy of the APOE e4 gene remained at their same level of thinking ability while those with two copies of the APOE e4 gene, continued to worsen during the 6-month treatment. The current study will more directly test the effectiveness or RSG XR on people who either have or lack the APOE e4 gene.
Read the detailed description
A 54-week, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled, parallel-group study to investigate the effects of rosiglitazone (extended release tablets) as adjunctive therapy to donepezil on cognition and overall clinical response in APOE e4-stratified subjects with mild to moderate Alzheimer's disease (REFLECT-2)
- Conditions
- Alzheimer's Disease
- Being tested
- Rosiglitazone Extended Release 2mg, Rosiglitazone Extended Release 8mg, Placebo, Donepezil
- Keywords
- apolipoprotein E, Alzheimer's disease, cognition, rosiglitazone, adjunctive therapy
- Medical subject headings
- Alzheimer Disease
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Rosiglitazone Extended Release 2mgDrug
Rosiglitazone Extended Release 2mg OD
Rosiglitazone Extended Release 8mgDrug
Rosiglitazone Extended Release 8mg OD
PlaceboOther
Placebo
DonepezilOther
Also called Aricept
Donepezil (At least 6 months of ongoing donepezil therapy for Alzheimer's disease, with stable dosing for at least the last 2 months (and with no intent to change for the duration of the study).
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Arm 1 | Experimental | Rosiglitazone Extended Release 2mg OD Receives: Drug: Rosiglitazone Extended Release 2mg; Other: Donepezil |
| Arm 2 | Experimental | Rosiglitazone Extended Release 8mg OD Receives: Drug: Rosiglitazone Extended Release 8mg; Other: Donepezil |
| Arm 3 | Placebo comparator | Placebo Receives: Other: Placebo; Other: Donepezil |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Change From Baseline in Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale - Cognitive Subscale (ADAS-Cog) Total Score at Week 48
ADAS is a performance-based test that measures specific cognitive and behavioral dysfunctions in participants with Alzheimer's Disease. The cognitive subscale of the ADAS (ADAS-Cog) comprises 11 items that are summed to a total score ranging from 0 to 70, with lower scores indicating less severe impairment. Change from baseline is calculated as Week 48 value minus the baseline value. APOE4 negative, All except E4/E4's: comprised of APOE4 negative and E4 heterozygote and full population was analyzed for this outcome measure. A hierarchical testing procedure was used to control for the two rosiglitazone dose groups and the genetic subgroups. Least square mean is entered for adjusted mean.
Measured: Baseline (Week 0) and Week 48
Change From Baseline in Clinical Dementia Rating Scale - Sum of Boxes (CDR-SB) at Week 48 for APOE E4
CDR-SB is a semi-structured interview of participants and their caregivers. Participant's cognitive status is rated across 6 domains of functioning, including memory, orientation, judgment/problem solving, community affairs, home/hobbies, and personal care. Severity score assigned for each of 6 domains; Total score (SB) ranges from 0 to 18. Higher scores indicate greater disease severity. Change from baseline is calculated as Week 48 value minus the baseline value. APOE4 negative, All except E4/E4's: comprised of APOE4 negative and E4 heterozygote and full population was analyzed for this outcome measure. A hierarchical testing procedure was used to control for the two rosiglitazone dose groups and the genetic subgroups.
Measured: Baseline (Week 0) and Week 48
Secondary outcomes (20)
Change From Baseline in Disability Assessment for Dementia Scale (DAD) Total Score
The DAD measures instrumental and basic activities of daily living in participants with Alzheimer's Disease (AD). This scale assesses a participants' ability to initiate, plan, and perform activities related to hygiene, dressing, continence, eating, meal preparation, telephoning, going on an outing, finance and correspondence, medications, leisure, and housework. The scale includes 23 items relating to instrumental activities of daily living and 17 items relating to basic self-care. Each item can be scored as 1 = yes, 0 = no, non applicable = NA. Total score was obtained by adding the rating for each question and converting this total score out of 100. The total score ranged from 0 to 100, where higher score indicated better function and lower score indicated greater severity of symptoms; a positive change from baseline indicated an improvement. Change from baseline is calculated as endpoint value minus the baseline value.
Measured: Baseline (Week 0), Week 8, 16, 24 and 48
Change From Baseline in Neuropsychiatric Inventory (NPI) Total Score
The NPI is a questionnaire that quantifies behavioral changes in dementia. For each of 12 behavioral domains there are 4 scores: Frequency (scale:1=occasionally to 4=very frequently), Severity (scale:1=Mild to 3=Severe), Total (frequency x severity), Caregiver distress (scale: 0=not at all distressing to 5=extremely distressing).The NPI Psychosis Subscale consists of the two domains of Delusions and Hallucinations, calculated by adding the Individual Item Scores, to yield a possible total score of 0 to 24. Lower score=less severity. Change from baseline is calculated as endpoint value minus the baseline value.
Measured: Baseline (Week 0), Week 8, 16, 24 and 48
Change From Screening in Mini Mental State Examination (MMSE) Total Score
The MMSE consists of 11 tests of orientation, memory (recent and immediate), concentration, language and praxis. The scale was completed by the investigator, based on the performance of the participant, and took approximately 5 to 10 minutes to administer. The scores from 11 tests were combined to obtain the total score. The total scores range from 0 to 30, with lower scores indicating greater cognitive impairment and higher score indicating better outcome; a positive change from screening indicated an improvement. The total MMSE score for participants at screening was between 10 and 26, inclusive, in order to be eligible to participate in the trial. Change from screening is calculated as endpoint value minus the screening value.
Measured: Screening (Week -4) and Week 48
Change From Baseline in the Domains of the Resource Utilization in Dementia Scale (RUD)
The RUD instrument was developed as a comprehensive tool to assess the amount of resource use among demented patients. RUD assessd both formal and informal resource use of the patient and the primary caregiver, making it possible to calculate costs from a societal perspective. Q1 corresponds to the number of hours during the last month the caregiver spent assisting the patient with toilet visits, eating, dressing, grooming, walking and bathing and Q2 corresponds to the number of hours during the last month the caregiver spent assisting the patient with shopping, food preparation, housekeeping, laundry, transportation, taking medication and managing financial matters. Change from Baseline was calculated as value at scheduled time point minus Baseline value. Baseline was defined as value at Week 0. Estimated value was calculated by Active treatment minus Placebo. The adjusted means were presented.
Measured: Baseline (Week 0), Week 12, 24, 36 and 48
Change From Baseline in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions Proxy Version (EQ-5D Proxy) Scale Total Score Assessed by Thermometer (Visual Analog Scale [VAS]) and Utility
The EQ-5D Proxy is a two part scale that evaluated the participant's health status via Thermometer and Utility scores. The Thermometer score was the caregiver's rating of the participant's overall health status on a VAS (0 ["worst possible status"] to 100 ["best imaginable status"]). The Utility score was a caregiver rating of health status on dimensions of mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression] where '1' indicated better health state (no problems); '3' indicated worst health state ("confined to bed"). Total possible score was the sum of individual items, ranged from 5 to 15; lower score indicated a better health state and higher score indicated greater severity of symptoms. A positive change from baseline indicated improvement in the Thermometer score and a negative change from baseline indicated improvement in the Utility score. Change from baseline is calculated as endpoint value minus the baseline value.
Measured: Baseline (Week 0), Week 12, 36 and 48
Change From Baseline in ADAS-Cog Total Score for Observed Cases at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 36 and 48
ADAS is a performance-based test that measures specific cognitive and behavioral dysfunctions in patients with Alzheimer's Disease. The cognitive subscale of the ADAS (ADAS-Cog) comprises 11 items that are summed to a total score ranging from 0 to 70, with lower scores indicating less severe impairment. Change from baseline is calculated as endpoint value minus the baseline value.
Measured: Baseline (Week 0), Week 8, 16, 24, 36 and 48
Change From Baseline in CDR-SB Score for Observed Cases at Weeks 12, 24, 36 and 48
CDR-SB is a semi-structured interview of participants and their caregivers. Participant's cognitive status is rated across 6 domains of functioning, including memory, orientation, judgment/problem solving, community affairs, home/hobbies, and personal care. Severity score assigned for each of 6 domains; Total score (SB) ranges from 0 to 18. Higher scores indicate greater disease severity. Change from baseline is calculated as endpoint value minus the baseline value.
Measured: Baseline (Week 0), Week 12, 24, 36 and 48
Change in ADAS-Cog Total Score for Observed Cases at Week 54 Compared to Week 48
ADAS is a performance-based test that measures specific cognitive and behavioral dysfunctions in patients with Alzheimer's Disease. The cognitive subscale of the ADAS (ADAS-Cog) comprises 11 items that are summed to a total score ranging from 0 to 70, with lower scores indicating less severe impairment. Change was calculated as endpoint value (Week 54) minus Week 48 value.
Measured: Week 48 and 54
Change in CDR-SB Total Score at Week 54 Compared to Week 48
CDR-SB is a semi-structured interview of participants and their caregivers. Participant's cognitive status is rated across 6 domains of functioning, including memory, orientation, judgment/problem solving, community affairs, home/hobbies, and personal care. Severity score assigned for each of 6 domains; Total score (SB) ranges from 0 to 18. Higher scores indicate greater disease severity. Change was calculated as endpoint value (Week 54) minus Week 48 value.
Measured: Week 48 and 54
Change From Baseline in Glycosylated Hemoglobin (HbA1c) at Week 48
Blood samples of participants were collected for HbA1c assessment. HbA1c is a form of hemoglobin that is measured primarily to identify the average plasma glucose concentration over a 2- to 3-month period. Change from Baseline in HbA1c was calculated as the value at Week 48 minus the value at Baseline.
Measured: Baseline (Week 0) and Week 48
Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)
An adverse event (AE) was defined as any untoward medical occurrence that occurred during the course of the trial after study treatment had started. An adverse event was therefore any unfavourable and unintended sign, symptom, or disease temporally associated with the use of study drug, whether or not considered related to the study drug. A Serious Adverse Event (SAE) is any untoward medical occurrence that at any dose results in death, are life threatening, requires hospitalization or prolongation of hospitalization or results in disability/incapacity, and congenital anomaly/birth defect. The data was reported for prospective period.
Measured: Up to Week 54
Mean Change From Baseline in Systolic and Diastolic Blood Pressure (BP)
The plethysmographic method was used to measure BP throughout the study. Change in Systolic and Diastolic BP was calculated as endpoint value minus the baseline value.
Measured: Baseline (Week 0), Week 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36, 48 and 56
Mean Change From Baseline in Heart Rate
Mean Change From Baseline in heart rate was calculated as endpoint value minus the baseline value.
Measured: Baseline (Week 0), Week 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36, 48 and 56
Mean Change From Baseline in Weight
Body weight was measured at all visits, without shoes and wearing light clothing. Mean Change From Baseline in Weight was calculated as endpoint value minus the baseline value.
Measured: Baseline (Week 0), Week 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36, 48 and 56
Change From Baseline in Hemoglobin Values
Blood samples of participants were collected for Hemoglobin. Change from baseline in Hemoglobin was calculated as endpoint value minus the baseline value.
Measured: Baseline (Week 0), Week 4, 16, 36 and 48
Change From Baseline in Hematocrit Values
Blood samples of participants were collected for Hematocrit . Change from baseline in Hematocrit was calculated as endpoint value minus the baseline value.
Measured: Baseline (Week 0), Week 4, 8, 12, 16, 36 and 48
Mean Change From Baseline in Short Term Memory Assessment Score
Short term memory assessment score was based on ADAS-Cog questionnaire (Question 1 and 7). ADAS is a performance-based test that measures specific cognitive and behavioral dysfunctions in participants with AD. Question 1 (Word Recall) and Question 7 (Word Recognition) of the ADAS-Cog questionnaire were summed to get a short term memory assessment score. Word recall task consist of the participants score was the mean number of words not recalled on three trials (maximum score 10) and word recognition task, to score this item the number of incorrect responses was counted (maximum error score was 12). The total score ranged from 0 to 22 with 0 indicating absence of symptoms and higher scores indicating greater dysfunction; a negative change from baseline indicated improvement. Change from Baseline in short term memory assessment was calculated as endpoint value minus the baseline value.
Measured: Baseline (Week 0), Week 8, 16, 24, 36, 48 and 56
Change From Baseline in HbA1c at Week 12, Week 24 and Week 36
Blood samples of participants were collected for HbA1c assessment. HbA1c is a form of hemoglobin that is measured primarily to identify the average plasma glucose concentration over a 2- to 3-month period. Change from Baseline in HbA1c was calculated as the value at time point minus the value at Baseline.
Measured: Baseline (Week 0) and Week 12, 24 and 36
Number of Participants With Laboratory Potential Clinical Concern (PCC) Values
Only those parameters for which at least one value of clinical concern (CC) was reported are summarized. Pre-defined limits of potential clinical concern (CC Low [relative to the lower limit of normal], CC High [relative to the upper limit of normal]) are: Hematocrit 0.8, 1.2; hemoglobin 10-11, 16.5-18; Red blood corpuscles(RBC) 0.8, 1.2; mean corpuscular volume (MCV) 0.8, 1.2; mean corpuscular hemoglobin (MCH) 0.8, 1.2; White blood corpuscles (WBC) 3- absolute value, 15-absolute value, Red Cell Distribution Width (RDW) 0.8, 1.2; Lymphocytes 0.75, 1.5; Monocytes NA, 2; Eosinophil NA, 2; platelet count 100-absolute, 500-absoulte; segmented neutrophil (SN) 0.75, 1.5 and Total Neutrophil (TN) 0.75, 1.5.
Measured: Baseline (Week 0), Week 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36, 48 and 56
Change From Baseline in Alzheimer's Carer Quality of Life Instrument (ACQLI) Total Score
The ACQLI was an assessment of caregiver quality of life. This instrument consists of 30 questions exploring various aspects of carer's quality of life. Each of the questions had a two point response and the 30 questions were summed to provide a total score. Items are assumed to be unidimensional (i.e., represent a single variable) and are scored 0/1 (false/true) before summation into a total score with a 0-30 range. The total score ranged from 0 to 30, where 0 indicated absence of symptoms and higher score indicated worse outcomes; a negative change from baseline indicated improvement. Change from baseline was calculated as endpoint value minus the baseline value.
Measured: Baseline (Week 0), Week 12, 36 and 48
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted4 Jul 2006 (estimated)
- Study start6 Jul 2006
- Primary completion1 Jan 2009
- Study completion28 Jan 2009
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Publications (1)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Alzheimer's DiseaseStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by GlaxoSmithKlineThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Quadruple blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 1,496 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- GlaxoSmithKline
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- GSK Clinical Trials, Study director, GlaxoSmithKline
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00348309
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- AVA102672
- Acronym
- REFLECT-2
- Status last verified
- Sep 2017
- First submitted
- 30 Jun 2006
- Last updated
- 28 Nov 2017
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- Individual data sharing
- Yes: Patient-level data for this study will be made available through www.clinicalstudydatarequest.com following the timelines and process described on this site.
Publications
Harrington C, Sawchak S, Chiang C, Davies J, Donovan C, Saunders AM, Irizarry M, Jeter B, Zvartau-Hind M, van Dyck CH, Gold M. Rosiglitazone does not improve cognition or global function when used as adjunctive therapy to AChE inhibitors in mild-to-moderate Alzheimer's disease: two phase 3 studies. Curr Alzheimer Res. 2011 Aug;8(5):592-606. doi: 10.2174/156720511796391935.
PubMed 21592048
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 28 Nov 2017. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- A 54-week, Double-blind, Randomized, Placebo-controlled, Parallel-group Study to Investigate the Effects of Rosiglitazone (Extended Release Tablets) as Adjunctive Therapy to Donepezil on Cognition and Overall Clinical Response in APOE ε4-stratified Subjects With Mild to Moderate Alzheimer's Disease.
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00348309
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- REFLECT-2 / AVA102672
- Conditions
- Alzheimer's Disease
- Keywords
- apolipoprotein E, Alzheimer's disease, cognition, rosiglitazone, adjunctive therapy
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 1,496 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- GlaxoSmithKlineIndustry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Study start
- 6 Jul 2006
- Primary completion
- 1 Jan 2009 (actual)
- Study completion
- 28 Jan 2009 (actual)
- First posted
- 4 Jul 2006 (estimated)
- Results
- Posted 28 Nov 2017
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Rosiglitazone (RSG) has been tested in clinical studies and is approved by the FDA as a treatment for type II diabetes mellitus, a disease that occurs when the body is unable to effectively use glucose. RSG XR, the investigational drug used in this study, is an extended-release form of RSG.
This study tests whether RSG XR safely provides clinical benefit to people with mild to moderate Alzheimer's disease (AD) when combined with the currently approved AD medication, Aricept (donepezil). RSG XR is a new approach to AD therapy and this study tests a new way to treat AD by testing whether one's genetic makeup affects their response to the study drug. Clinical data suggesting that RSG may benefit AD patients was first seen in a small study performed at the University of Washington and then from a larger GSK study conducted in Europe and New Zealand. In the first study, subjects receiving RSG once daily for 6 months scored significantly better on 3 tests of memory and thought than those who did not receive RSG. In the GSK study, those that appeared to benefit most from treatment with RSG XR had a specific genetic pattern. They did not have the gene that caused them to produce the protein apolipoprotein E e4 (APOE e4). Subjects who have the APOE e4 gene may have two copies, one from each parent, or they may have only one APOE e4 gene meaning that they inherited either the APOE e2 or APOE e3 version of the gene, instead of APOE e4, from one of their parents. Subjects with one copy of the APOE e4 gene remained at their same level of thinking ability while those with two copies of the APOE e4 gene, continued to worsen during the 6-month treatment. The current study will more directly test the effectiveness or RSG XR on people who either have or lack the APOE e4 gene.
Detailed description
A 54-week, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled, parallel-group study to investigate the effects of rosiglitazone (extended release tablets) as adjunctive therapy to donepezil on cognition and overall clinical response in APOE e4-stratified subjects with mild to moderate Alzheimer's disease (REFLECT-2)
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Quadruple blind (participant, care provider, investigator, outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 3
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Arm 1 | Experimental | Drug: Rosiglitazone Extended Release 2mg, Other: DonepezilRosiglitazone Extended Release 2mg OD |
| Arm 2 | Experimental | Drug: Rosiglitazone Extended Release 8mg, Other: DonepezilRosiglitazone Extended Release 8mg OD |
| Arm 3 | Placebo comparator | Other: Placebo, Other: DonepezilPlacebo |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 50 to 90 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (20 listed)
- A subject will be eligible for inclusion in this study only if all of the following criteria apply:
- Male or female subject with a clinical diagnosis of probable Alzheimer's disease in accordance with NINCDS-ADRDA criteria.
- (Note: National Institute of Neurological and Communicative Disorders and Stroke (NINCDS) and Alzheimer's Disease and Related Disorders Association (ADRDA).)
- Subject has mild to moderate Alzheimer's disease as defined by a MMSE score 10 to 26 inclusive at Screening.
- Hachinski Ischemia Score ≤ 4 at Screening.
Key exclusion criteria (30 listed)
- A subject will not be eligible for inclusion in this study if any of the following criteria apply:
- Diagnosis of possible, probable, or definite vascular dementia in accordance with NINDS-AIREN criteria.
- (Note: National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NINDS) and Association Internationale pour la Recherche et l'Enseignement en Neurosciences (AIREN).)
- History or evidence of any other CNS disorder that could be interpreted as a cause of dementia: e.g. cerebrovascular disease (stroke, hemorrhage), structural abnormality, epilepsy, infectious or inflammatory/demyelinating CNS conditions, Parkinson's disease.
- Evidence of the following disorders: current vitamin B12 deficiency, positive syphilis serology, or active thyroid dysfunction (particularly that suggestive of hypothyroidism), including abnormally high or low serum levels of thyroid stimulating hormone (TSH) that are clinically significant in the opinion of the investigator.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Rosiglitazone Extended Release 2mgRosiglitazone Extended Release 2mg OD | Drug | Arm 1 |
| Rosiglitazone Extended Release 8mgRosiglitazone Extended Release 8mg OD | Drug | Arm 2 |
| PlaceboPlacebo | Other | Arm 3 |
| DonepezilAlso: AriceptDonepezil (At least 6 months of ongoing donepezil therapy for Alzheimer's disease, with stable dosing for at least the last 2 months (and with no intent to change for the duration of the study). | Other | Arm 1, Arm 2, Arm 3 |
Primary outcome
Change From Baseline in Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale - Cognitive Subscale (ADAS-Cog) Total Score at Week 48
Time frame: Baseline (Week 0) and Week 48
ADAS is a performance-based test that measures specific cognitive and behavioral dysfunctions in participants with Alzheimer's Disease. The cognitive subscale of the ADAS (ADAS-Cog) comprises 11 items that are summed to a total score ranging from 0 to 70, with lower scores indicating less severe impairment. Change from baseline is calculated as Week 48 value minus the baseline value. APOE4 negative, All except E4/E4's: comprised of APOE4 negative and E4 heterozygote and full population was analyzed for this outcome measure. A hierarchical testing procedure was used to control for the two rosiglitazone dose groups and the genetic subgroups. Least square mean is entered for adjusted mean.
Change From Baseline in Clinical Dementia Rating Scale - Sum of Boxes (CDR-SB) at Week 48 for APOE E4
Time frame: Baseline (Week 0) and Week 48
CDR-SB is a semi-structured interview of participants and their caregivers. Participant's cognitive status is rated across 6 domains of functioning, including memory, orientation, judgment/problem solving, community affairs, home/hobbies, and personal care. Severity score assigned for each of 6 domains; Total score (SB) ranges from 0 to 18. Higher scores indicate greater disease severity. Change from baseline is calculated as Week 48 value minus the baseline value. APOE4 negative, All except E4/E4's: comprised of APOE4 negative and E4 heterozygote and full population was analyzed for this outcome measure. A hierarchical testing procedure was used to control for the two rosiglitazone dose groups and the genetic subgroups.
20 secondary outcomes
Change From Baseline in Disability Assessment for Dementia Scale (DAD) Total Score
Time frame: Baseline (Week 0), Week 8, 16, 24 and 48
Change From Baseline in Neuropsychiatric Inventory (NPI) Total Score
Time frame: Baseline (Week 0), Week 8, 16, 24 and 48
Change From Screening in Mini Mental State Examination (MMSE) Total Score
Time frame: Screening (Week -4) and Week 48
Change From Baseline in the Domains of the Resource Utilization in Dementia Scale (RUD)
Time frame: Baseline (Week 0), Week 12, 24, 36 and 48
Change From Baseline in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions Proxy Version (EQ-5D Proxy) Scale Total Score Assessed by Thermometer (Visual Analog Scale [VAS]) and Utility
Time frame: Baseline (Week 0), Week 12, 36 and 48
Change From Baseline in ADAS-Cog Total Score for Observed Cases at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 36 and 48
Time frame: Baseline (Week 0), Week 8, 16, 24, 36 and 48
Change From Baseline in CDR-SB Score for Observed Cases at Weeks 12, 24, 36 and 48
Time frame: Baseline (Week 0), Week 12, 24, 36 and 48
Change in ADAS-Cog Total Score for Observed Cases at Week 54 Compared to Week 48
Time frame: Week 48 and 54
Change in CDR-SB Total Score at Week 54 Compared to Week 48
Time frame: Week 48 and 54
Change From Baseline in Glycosylated Hemoglobin (HbA1c) at Week 48
Time frame: Baseline (Week 0) and Week 48
Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)
Time frame: Up to Week 54
Mean Change From Baseline in Systolic and Diastolic Blood Pressure (BP)
Time frame: Baseline (Week 0), Week 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36, 48 and 56
Mean Change From Baseline in Heart Rate
Time frame: Baseline (Week 0), Week 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36, 48 and 56
Mean Change From Baseline in Weight
Time frame: Baseline (Week 0), Week 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36, 48 and 56
Change From Baseline in Hemoglobin Values
Time frame: Baseline (Week 0), Week 4, 16, 36 and 48
Change From Baseline in Hematocrit Values
Time frame: Baseline (Week 0), Week 4, 8, 12, 16, 36 and 48
Mean Change From Baseline in Short Term Memory Assessment Score
Time frame: Baseline (Week 0), Week 8, 16, 24, 36, 48 and 56
Change From Baseline in HbA1c at Week 12, Week 24 and Week 36
Time frame: Baseline (Week 0) and Week 12, 24 and 36
Number of Participants With Laboratory Potential Clinical Concern (PCC) Values
Time frame: Baseline (Week 0), Week 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36, 48 and 56
Change From Baseline in Alzheimer's Carer Quality of Life Instrument (ACQLI) Total Score
Time frame: Baseline (Week 0), Week 12, 36 and 48
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 28 Nov 2017.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- Background: PubMed 21592048Harrington C, Sawchak S, Chiang C, Davies J, Donovan C, Saunders AM, Irizarry M, Jeter B, Zvartau-Hind M, van Dyck CH, Gold M. Rosiglitazone does not improve cognition or global function when used as adjunctive therapy to AChE inhibitors in mild-to-moderate Alzheimer's disease: two phase 3 studies. Curr Alzheimer Res. 2011 Aug;8(5):592-606. doi: 10.2174/156720511796391935.
- Researchers can use this site to request access to anonymised patient level data and/or supporting documents from clinical studies to conduct further research.Link provided by the sponsor.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Yes. Patient-level data for this study will be made available through www.clinicalstudydatarequest.com following the timelines and process described on this site.
Related trials for Alzheimer's Disease
RecruitingPhase 2
Neuroplasticity Enhancement From Cognitive Training Reinforced by Psilocybin
Alzheimer's Disease
Not yet recruiting
Acupressure as Long-term Intervention to Slow the Progression of Early/Mild Alzheimer's Disease
Alzheimer's Disease
RecruitingObservational study
Effectiveness and Safety of Disease-Modifying Therapy for Alzheimer's Disease: A Multicenter Retrospective Study
Alzheimer's Disease (AD)
RecruitingPhase 3
A Phase 3 Study to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of KarXT + KarX-EC for the Treatment of Agitation Associated With Alzheimer's Disease (ADAGIO-1)
Alzheimer Disease
RecruitingPhase 3
A Study of Trontinemab in Cognitively Unimpaired Individuals at Risk for Progression to Symptomatic Alzheimer's Disease
Alzheimer's Disease
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
GSK Clinical Trials study director
GlaxoSmithKline
249 sites in 19 countries: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Rosiglitazone Extended Release 2mg, Rosiglitazone Extended Release 8mg and Donepezil in people with Alzheimer's Disease, run by GlaxoSmithKline at 249 sites in 19 countries.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 20 inclusion and 30 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 28 Nov 2017. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 249 sites in Germany, United States, France, Japan, Italy and 14 more countries. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 28 Nov 2017). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Change From Baseline in Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale - Cognitive Subscale (ADAS-Cog) Total Score at Week 48 (time frame: Baseline (Week 0) and Week 48). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT00348309, which also lists 1 linked publication.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 28 Nov 2017.