AzTrials
AzTrials

Deep Vein Thrombosis of the Lower ExtremitiesNCT00353093

The ERASMUS Study: Limited vs Extended US for DVT Diagnosis

A study testing Ultrasonography of the deep vein system of the legs in people with Deep Vein Thrombosis of the Lower Extremities, run by University of Padova.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Currently, patients with suspected deep vein thrombosis (DVT) of the lower extremities receive the ultrasound investigation of their deep vein system, either by limited ultrasonography (ultrasonography confined to the proximal veins, repeating the test after one week in patients with positive D-dimer) or by extended… Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
What is being tested?
Ultrasonography of the deep vein system of the legs
Type of treatment
Surgery or procedure
How many people
2,000 participants
Where
No sites listed yet
Study dates
Jan 2003to Jul 2005
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • outpatients with clinically suspected deep vein thrombosis of the lower extremities

Who cannot join

  • history of previous venous thromboembolism
  • clinical suspicion of pulmonary embolism
  • life expectancy shorter than 3 months
  • therapeutic doses of unfractionated heparin, low molecular weight heparin or oral anticoagulants for more than 48 hours
  • another indication for anticoagulant treatment
  • pregnancy
Show all 9Show fewer
  • age less than 18 years
  • inaccessibility to follow-up
  • refused participation in the study

About this study

Official title: Limited Versus Extended Ultrasonography for the Diagnosis of Clinically Symptomatic Deep Vein Thrombosis of the Lower Extremities. A Randomized Study

Currently, patients with suspected deep vein thrombosis (DVT) of the lower extremities receive the ultrasound investigation of their deep vein system, either by limited ultrasonography (ultrasonography confined to the proximal veins, repeating the test after one week in patients with positive D-dimer) or by extended ultrasonography (ultrasonography extented to the entire deep vein system of the legs). No study has directly compared the two strategies to assess their accuracy and safety. We plan to compare the accuracy and safety of the two strategies in a prospective randomized study addressing more than 2000 consecutive outpatients presenting with the clinical suspicion of DVT.

Read the detailed description

All consecutive outpatients referred to the study center with clinically suspected deep vein thrombosis are potentially eligible for inclusion. Patients are excluded if they have a history of previous venous thromboembolism, have clinical suspicion of pulmonary embolism, have a life expectancy shorter than 3 months, have used therapeutic doses of unfractionated heparin, low molecular weight heparin or oral anticoagulants for more than 48 hours, have another indication for anticoagulant treatment, are pregnant, are aged less than 18 years, are inaccessible to follow-up, or refuse participation in the study.

Randomization Before randomization, patients are interviewed using a standardized questionnaire in order to collect information on risk factors for venous thrombosis, and the presence of several clinical signs and symptoms. Subsequently, they are randomized to the limited or the extended ultrasound strategy through computer generated lists, each of 100 patients arranged in balanced blocks of 10, specific for each center. The list is accessible only for a study nurse who informed the study physicians about group allocation once patients had provided informed consent.

Initial diagnostic workup Patients randomized to limited ultrasonography undergo compression ultrasonography, confining the investigation to the common femoral and the popliteal vein down to its trifurcation. In patients with normal findings D-dimer testing is performed, and they are subsequently managed according to its results: patients with normal D-dimer levels do not receive further investigation, while those with abnormal test are scheduled for repeat compression ultrasonography within one week.

Patients randomized to the extended ultrasonography receive first the evaluation of the proximal vein system, including the common femoral, the superficial femoral and the popliteal vein down its trifurcation. Then patients with compressible proximal veins undergo the extensive evaluation of the calf vein system, including the anterior tibial, posterior tibial and peroneal veins, and, if the deep veins were normal, also of the muscular (gastrocnemial and soleal) veins.

Limited ultrasonography and D-dimer The common femoral at the groin, and the popliteal vein down to its branching into the calf deep veins at the popliteal fossa, are examined in the transverse plane only, with a 7.5 MHz linear probe. The test results are categorized as normal (compressible veins) or abnormal (non compressible veins).

We use a rapid whole blood bedside D-dimer assay (SimpliRED® D-Dimer assay, AGEN Biomedical Ltd., Brisbane Australia). This assay is based on autologous red cell agglutination, using a chemical conjugate of a monoclonal antibody specific to human D-dimer (DD-3B6/22) linked to a monoclonal antibody which binds to the surface of human red blood cells (RAT-1C3/86) as active agent. The test can be performed either on capillary or on citrated venous blood. Agglutination occurs at D-dimer concentrations above 0.2 mg/L. The SimpliRED® results are categorized as normal, abnormal or non interpretable. The latter finding is categorized as abnormal.

Extended ultrasonography All veins are imaged along their length with a 7.5 MHz linear transducer. The proximal venous system is examined starting from the (common and superficial) femoral veins, which are scanned down to the distal part of the thigh, with the patient lying supine. Then, with the patient in the prone position the popliteal vein down to its trifurcation is evaluated. The calf veins are evaluated with the patient sitting with his/her legs hanging over the edge of the bed. Starting from the most proximal venous segments downwards, the anterior, posterior tibial and peroneal veins are visualized along their length, employing augmentation maneuvers (manual squeezing of the distal calf or of the foot) to enhance vessel visualization. The same approach is used to image the muscular veins. The only criterion to adjudicate a thrombosis involving the proximal system and the tibial and peroneal veins is the finding of a non compressible venous segment. As for the muscular veins, criteria for abnormal testing are incompressibility or the lack of spontaneous intraluminal color filling or reverse-flow color filling after augmentation maneuvers. All tests are performed by highly skilled physicians.

Follow-up All patients with an initial normal workup are discouraged from receiving antithrombotic drugs, and are scheduled for a clinical evaluation at three months. They are instructed to immediately contact the study centers should symptoms of venous thromboembolism become manifest in the meantime. In this case they undergo instrumental testing to confirm or refute the presence of the disease. Patients failing to attend the scheduled visit are contacted by telephone to assess their status, and invited to attend a clinical evaluation at the study centre.

Outcomes The primary outcomes of the study are: (1) the prevalence and location of venous thrombosis as shown by the initial diagnostic workup; (2) the rate of symptomatic venous thromboembolic events (including proximal vein thrombosis, isolated thrombosis of the tibial or peroneal veins in either leg, and pulmonary embolism) during three months of follow up in patients with an initially normal diagnostic workup. All suspected events are to be objectively evaluated as follows: ipsilateral or contralateral deep vein thrombosis is ruled in by abnormal compression ultrasonography or by the finding of an intraluminal filling defect on ascending venography, visible on two different projections; suspected pulmonary embolism is confirmed by an abnormal spiral computed tomography of the lung, by a high probability ventilation-perfusion lung scan, or by an abnormal pulmonary angiography. Fatal pulmonary embolism is adjudicated on the findings of autopsy, in case of sudden and otherwise inexplicable death, or on clinical grounds according to the opinion of an independent physician.

An independent and blind committee adjudicates all suspected thromboembolic events and all deaths occurring during the follow up based on all relevant documents and footage.

Being tested
Ultrasonography of the deep vein system of the legs
Keywords
deep vein thrombosis,D-dimer,ultrasonography

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Ultrasonography of the deep vein system of the legsProcedure or surgery

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. To assess(1) the prevalence and location of venous thrombosis

  2. as shown by the initial diagnostic workup; (2) the rate of

  3. symptomatic venous thromboembolic events (including proximal

  4. vein thrombosis, isolated thrombosis of the tibial or peroneal

  5. veins in either leg, and pulmonary embolism) during three months

  6. of follow up in patients with an initially normal diagnostic workup.

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted17 Jul 2006 (estimated)
  2. Study startJan 2003
  3. Study completionJul 2005

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Diagnosis
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
2,000 participants
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT00353093
Sponsor's protocol ID
07/01
Status last verified
Jul 2005
First submitted
14 Jul 2006
Last updated
20 Oct 2006
Results posted
No

Publications

  • Bernardi E, Camporese G, Buller HR, Siragusa S, Imberti D, Berchio A, Ghirarduzzi A, Verlato F, Anastasio R, Prati C, Piccioli A, Pesavento R, Bova C, Maltempi P, Zanatta N, Cogo A, Cappelli R, Bucherini E, Cuppini S, Noventa F, Prandoni P; Erasmus Study Group. Serial 2-point ultrasonography plus D-dimer vs whole-leg color-coded Doppler ultrasonography for diagnosing suspected symptomatic deep vein thrombosis: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA. 2008 Oct 8;300(14):1653-9. doi: 10.1001/jama.300.14.1653.

    PubMed 18840838

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Ultrasonography of the deep vein system of the legs in people with Deep Vein Thrombosis of the Lower Extremities, run by University of Padova.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 9 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 20 Oct 2006. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

To assess(1) the prevalence and location of venous thrombosis. The study lists 6 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT00353093, which also lists 1 linked publication.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 20 Oct 2006.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in