Breast CancerPhase 3NCT00354302
Bone Mineral Density in Postmenopausal Women With Primary Breast Cancer Who Are Receiving Treatment on Clinical Trial
A Phase 3 study testing calcium carbonate, calcium citrate and cholecalciferol in people with Breast Cancer and Osteoporosis, run by NCIC Clinical Trials Group at 13 sites in Canada.
Trial summary
RATIONALE: Learning about the effect of exemestane and anastrozole on bone mineral density in postmenopausal women with primary breast cancer may help plan treatment, decrease the risk of broken bones, and help patients live more comfortably. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 45 to 120 years, women only
- Conditions the study is for
- Breast Cancer, Osteoporosis
- What is being tested?
- calcium carbonate, calcium citrate and cholecalciferol
- Type of treatment
- Surgery or procedure
- How many people
- 497 participants
- Where
- 13 sitesCanada
- Study dates
- 24 Apr 2006to 6 Jan 2012
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 45 to 120 years
- Women only
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
DISEASE CHARACTERISTICS:
- Enrolled in and meets eligibility requirements for protocol CAN-NCIC-MA27
- Acceptable quality dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DEXA) of the L1-L4 postero-anterior spine and hip within 12 weeks prior to randomization on protocol CAN-NCIC-MA27
- Hormone receptor status:
- Estrogen receptor- and/or progesterone receptor-positive tumor
PATIENT CHARACTERISTICS:
- Female
- Postmenopausal
- No malabsorption syndrome
- No known cholecalciferol (vitamin D) deficiency, active hyper- or hypoparathyroidism, or Paget's disease
- No uncontrolled thyroid disease, Cushing's disease, or other pituitary disease
- No other bone disease (including osteomalacia or osteogenesis imperfecta)
PRIOR CONCURRENT THERAPY:
- More than 6 months since prior drugs (investigational or not), including bisphosphonates, for the prevention of osteoporosis (stratum I)
- More than 12 months since prior and no concurrent anticonvulsants
- More than 6 months since prior and no concurrent corticosteroids at doses > 5 mg/day of prednisone (or equivalent) for > 2 weeks
- More than 12 months since prior and no concurrent anabolic steroids
- No prior bisphosphonates (stratum II)
- No concurrent sodium fluoride at daily doses ≥ 5 mg/day
- No long-term (i.e., > 6 months) use of coumarins
- No concurrent drugs (investigational or not), including bisphosphonates, for the prevention of osteoporosis (for patients with no osteopenia or osteoporosis [stratum I])
Trial locations and contacts
13 sites in 1 country.
13 sites in 1 country
Canada13 sites
Cambridge Memorial Hospital
Cambridge, Ontario, N1R 3G2
Hopital Charles LeMoyne
Greenfield Park, Quebec, J4V 2H1
The Moncton Hospital
Moncton, New Brunswick, E1C 6Z8
CHA-Hopital Du St-Sacrement
Québec, Quebec, G1S 4L8
Allan Blair Cancer Centre
Regina, Saskatchewan, S4T 7T1
Atlantic Health Sciences Corporation
Saint John, New Brunswick, E2L 4L2
Algoma District Cancer Program
Sault Ste. Marie, Ontario, P6B 0A8
Thunder Bay Regional Health Science Centre
Thunder Bay, Ontario, P7B 6V4
Odette Cancer Centre
Toronto, Ontario, M4N 3M5
St. Michael's Hospital
Toronto, Ontario, M5B 1W8
Univ. Health Network-Princess Margaret Hospital
Toronto, Ontario, M5G 2M9
BCCA - Vancouver Cancer Centre
Vancouver, British Columbia, V5Z 4E6
CancerCare Manitoba
Winnipeg, Manitoba, R3E 0V9
About this study
Official title: The Influence of Five Years of Adjuvant Anastrozole or Exemestane on Bone Mineral Density In Postmenopausal Women With Primary Breast Cancer
RATIONALE: Learning about the effect of exemestane and anastrozole on bone mineral density in postmenopausal women with primary breast cancer may help plan treatment, decrease the risk of broken bones, and help patients live more comfortably.
PURPOSE: This phase III trial is studying bone mineral density in postmenopausal women with primary breast cancer who are receiving treatment on clinical trial CAN-NCIC-MA27.
Read the detailed description
OBJECTIVES:
- Determine whether there is a clinically relevant difference in bone mineral density (BMD) at 2 years in postmenopausal women with primary breast cancer (with or without osteopenia or osteoporosis) treated with exemestane vs anastrozole on protocol CAN-NCIC-MA27.
OUTLINE: This is a multicenter, companion study. Patients are stratified according to baseline bone mineral density (BMD) measurement (T-score* ≥ -2.0 standard deviation [SD] [no osteopenia or osteoporosis] vs T-score* < -2.0 SD).
NOTE: *The lowest of the two T-scores: L1-L4 or total hip
Blood samples for the identification of bone biomarkers (formation marker: serum amino-terminal procollagen 1 extension peptide [P1NP] and resorption marker: serum N-telopeptide) are obtained at baseline and at 6 and 12 months. BMD is determined by dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DEXA) at baseline and then annually for 5 years (or for as long as patient is receiving treatment on protocol CAN-NCIC-MA27).
Patients receive oral calcium and oral cholecalciferol (vitamin D) daily. Patients with osteopenia or osteoporosis (stratum II) also receive oral bisphosphonate therapy
PROJECTED ACCRUAL: A total of 408 patients will be accrued for this study.
- Conditions
- Breast Cancer, Osteoporosis
- Being tested
- calcium carbonate, calcium citrate, cholecalciferol, alendronate sodium, calcium gluconate
- Keywords
- osteoporosis, stage I breast cancer, stage II breast cancer, stage IIIA breast cancer
- Medical subject headings
- Breast Neoplasms, Osteoporosis
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
calcium carbonateDietary supplement
calcium citrateDietary supplement
cholecalciferolDietary supplement
alendronate sodiumDrug
calcium gluconateDrug
risedronate sodiumDrug
laboratory biomarker analysisOther
dual x-ray absorptometryProcedure or surgery
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Percentage change of bone mineral density (BMD) measured at 2 years (from baseline) in the L1-L4 region of the spine and the hip
Measured: 5 years
Secondary outcomes (6)
Percentage change in BMD at 5 years (from baseline)
Measured: 5 years
Mean percentage change in BMD at 1, 3, and 5 years (from baseline)
Measured: 5 years
Proportion of patients without osteopenia or osteoporosis (stratum I) who develop BMD below the absolute threshold for osteopenia (< -2.0 standard deviation below the mean), suffer any osteoporotic fracture, or have an asymptomatic fracture revealed ...
Measured: 5 years
Percentage of patients with osteopenia or osteoporosis (stratum II) who have ≥ 5% improvement of BMD at 2 years post randomization on protocol CAN-NCIC-MA27 and who have clinically apparent osteoporosis-related fracture of the long bones
Measured: 5 years
Pattern of change in bone biomarkers from baseline
Measured: 5 years
Clinical safety and tolerability of study medications
Measured: 5 years
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted20 Jul 2006 (estimated)
- Study start24 Apr 2006
- Primary completionMar 2011
- Study completion6 Jan 2012
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (1)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Breast CancerStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Primary purpose
- Diagnosis
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- Quadruple blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 497 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- NCIC Clinical Trials Group
- Sponsor type
- Research network
- Collaborators
- National Cancer Institute (NCI), North Central Cancer Treatment Group, SWOG Cancer Research Network
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Paul E. Goss, MD, PhD, Study chair, Massachusetts General HospitalJames N. Ingle, MD, Study chair, Mayo ClinicDawn Hershman, MD, Study chair, Herbert Irving Comprehensive Cancer Center
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00354302
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- MA27B
- Other IDs
- CAN-NCIC-MA27B, SWOG-NCIC-MA27B, NCCTG-NCIC-MA27B, CAN-NCIC-BONE, CDR0000483099
- Status last verified
- Jan 2012
- First submitted
- 19 Jul 2006
- Last updated
- 2 Apr 2020
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- Individual data sharing
- No
Publications
Goss PE, Hershman DL, Cheung AM, Ingle JN, Khosla S, Stearns V, Chalchal H, Rowland K, Muss HB, Linden HM, Scher J, Pritchard KI, Elliott CR, Badovinac-Crnjevic T, St Louis J, Chapman JA, Shepherd LE. Effects of adjuvant exemestane versus anastrozole on bone mineral density for women with early breast cancer (MA.27B): a companion analysis of a randomised controlled trial. Lancet Oncol. 2014 Apr;15(4):474-82. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(14)70035-X. Epub 2014 Mar 11.
PubMed 24636210
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 2 Apr 2020. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- The Influence of Five Years of Adjuvant Anastrozole or Exemestane on Bone Mineral Density In Postmenopausal Women With Primary Breast Cancer
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00354302
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- MA27B
- Conditions
- Breast Cancer, Osteoporosis
- Keywords
- osteoporosis, stage I breast cancer, stage II breast cancer, stage IIIA breast cancer
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 497 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- NCIC Clinical Trials GroupResearch network
- Collaborators
- National Cancer Institute (NCI), North Central Cancer Treatment Group, SWOG Cancer Research Network
- Study start
- 24 Apr 2006 (actual)
- Primary completion
- Mar 2011 (actual)
- Study completion
- 6 Jan 2012 (actual)
- First posted
- 20 Jul 2006 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
RATIONALE: Learning about the effect of exemestane and anastrozole on bone mineral density in postmenopausal women with primary breast cancer may help plan treatment, decrease the risk of broken bones, and help patients live more comfortably.
PURPOSE: This phase III trial is studying bone mineral density in postmenopausal women with primary breast cancer who are receiving treatment on clinical trial CAN-NCIC-MA27.
Detailed description
OBJECTIVES:
- Determine whether there is a clinically relevant difference in bone mineral density (BMD) at 2 years in postmenopausal women with primary breast cancer (with or without osteopenia or osteoporosis) treated with exemestane vs anastrozole on protocol CAN-NCIC-MA27.
OUTLINE: This is a multicenter, companion study. Patients are stratified according to baseline bone mineral density (BMD) measurement (T-score* ≥ -2.0 standard deviation [SD] [no osteopenia or osteoporosis] vs T-score* < -2.0 SD).
NOTE: *The lowest of the two T-scores: L1-L4 or total hip
Blood samples for the identification of bone biomarkers (formation marker: serum amino-terminal procollagen 1 extension peptide [P1NP] and resorption marker: serum N-telopeptide) are obtained at baseline and at 6 and 12 months. BMD is determined by dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DEXA) at baseline and then annually for 5 years (or for as long as patient is receiving treatment on protocol CAN-NCIC-MA27).
Patients receive oral calcium and oral cholecalciferol (vitamin D) daily. Patients with osteopenia or osteoporosis (stratum II) also receive oral bisphosphonate therapy
PROJECTED ACCRUAL: A total of 408 patients will be accrued for this study.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Diagnosis
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- Quadruple blind (participant, care provider, investigator, outcomes assessor)
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 45 to 120 years
- Sex
- Female only
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| calcium carbonate | Dietary supplement | – |
| calcium citrate | Dietary supplement | – |
| cholecalciferol | Dietary supplement | – |
| alendronate sodium | Drug | – |
| calcium gluconate | Drug | – |
| risedronate sodium | Drug | – |
| laboratory biomarker analysis | Other | – |
| dual x-ray absorptometry | Procedure or surgery | – |
Primary outcome
Percentage change of bone mineral density (BMD) measured at 2 years (from baseline) in the L1-L4 region of the spine and the hip
Time frame: 5 years
6 secondary outcomes
Percentage change in BMD at 5 years (from baseline)
Time frame: 5 years
Mean percentage change in BMD at 1, 3, and 5 years (from baseline)
Time frame: 5 years
Proportion of patients without osteopenia or osteoporosis (stratum I) who develop BMD below the absolute threshold for osteopenia (< -2.0 standard deviation below the mean), suffer any osteoporotic fracture, or have an asymptomatic fracture revealed ...
Time frame: 5 years
Percentage of patients with osteopenia or osteoporosis (stratum II) who have ≥ 5% improvement of BMD at 2 years post randomization on protocol CAN-NCIC-MA27 and who have clinically apparent osteoporosis-related fracture of the long bones
Time frame: 5 years
Pattern of change in bone biomarkers from baseline
Time frame: 5 years
Clinical safety and tolerability of study medications
Time frame: 5 years
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 2 Apr 2020.
- Results publication: PubMed 24636210Goss PE, Hershman DL, Cheung AM, Ingle JN, Khosla S, Stearns V, Chalchal H, Rowland K, Muss HB, Linden HM, Scher J, Pritchard KI, Elliott CR, Badovinac-Crnjevic T, St Louis J, Chapman JA, Shepherd LE. Effects of adjuvant exemestane versus anastrozole on bone mineral density for women with early breast cancer (MA.27B): a companion analysis of a randomised controlled trial. Lancet Oncol. 2014 Apr;15(4):474-82. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(14)70035-X. Epub 2014 Mar 11.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Breast Cancer
Active, not recruiting
Streamlined Geriatric and Oncological Evaluation Based On IC Technology
Breast Cancer, Comorbidities and Coexisting Conditions
RecruitingPhase 2
Gene Signatures to Guide HR+MBC Therapy in a Diverse Cohort
Invasive Mammary Carcinoma, Metastatic Breast Cancer
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Comparison of Reliability, Time Cost, and Participant Comfort of Lymphedema Assessments in Upper Extremity
Lymphedema, Upper Extremity Lymphedema
RecruitingPhase 3
A Study of Camrelizumab Plus Chemotherapy in Combination With or Without Famitinib as Neoadjuvant Therapy in Participants With Triple Negative Breast Cancer (BCTOP-T-N01)
TNBC - Triple-Negative Breast Cancer
RecruitingPhase 3
Testing Whether Hormone Therapy With Ribociclib is as Effective as Chemotherapy Followed by Hormone Therapy With Ribociclib for the Treatment of High Anatomic Stage Breast Cancer With Low Recurrence Risk, The RxFINE-Low Trial
Anatomic Stage II Breast Cancer AJCC v8, Anatomic Stage IIIA Breast Cancer AJCC v8
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Paul E. Goss, MD, PhD study chair
Massachusetts General Hospital
James N. Ingle, MD study chair
Mayo Clinic
Dawn Hershman, MD study chair
Herbert Irving Comprehensive Cancer Center
13 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 3 study testing calcium carbonate, calcium citrate and cholecalciferol in people with Breast Cancer and Osteoporosis, run by NCIC Clinical Trials Group at 13 sites in Canada.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 2 Apr 2020. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 13 sites in Canada. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Percentage change of bone mineral density (BMD) measured at 2 years (from baseline) in the L1-L4 region of the spine and the hip (time frame: 5 years). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT00354302, which also lists 1 linked publication.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 2 Apr 2020.