EpilepsyNCT00356018
Compliance With Once-Daily Divalproex Extended-Release Tablets (Depakote-ER) Versus Multiple-Daily Dose Valproic Acid Capsules (Depakene) in Epilepsy:
An observational study of Epilepsy, run by Orlando Health, Inc. at 1 site in United States.
Trial summary
To determine, in a randomized, parallel open-label fashion, compliance rates between once-daily extended-release divalproex sodium tablets (Depakote-ER®, Abbott Labs) versus multiple-daily dose valproic acid capsules (Depakene®, Abbott Labs) in an epilepsy population. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 16 to 99 yearsHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Epilepsy
- What is being tested?
- Compliance
- Type of treatment
- Lifestyle or therapy programme
- How many people
- 5 participants
- Where
- 1 siteUnited States
- Study dates
- Jul 2006to May 2007
- Phase
- Observational
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 16 to 99 years
- All sexes
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Child, Adult, Older adult
Study population: The population includes both patients whose seizures are relatively well controlled on their present conventional, enteric-coated twice-daily or three-times daily Divalproex sodium regimen.
Inclusion Criteria:1) Patients, age 16 and above, currently taking Divalproex-DR for any seizure disorder; 2) Other AEDs are permitted concurrently, although compliance with these will not be recorded. Other medications for co-morbid disease are permitted, provided no plans for changes in medications used for the treatment of the concomitant disorder are expected.
- Patients must demonstrate a 75% or greater compliance rate with DR via calendar during the week of familiarity with the MEMs unit. The threshold value of 75% has been chosen since research shows that people take approximately 75% of their AED(s) as prescribed (13,14), and the same numerical value is frequently used in determining whether or not to retain a patient in clinical Phase 2a-3b industry-sponsored study.
-
Exclusion Criteria:1) patients with a recent history of status epilepticus; 2) patients who have refractory or unstable epilepsy; 3) patients with acute illnesses requiring changes in concurrent drugs; 4) patients unwilling to change from their present DR regimen to divalproex-ER or IR-VPA.
- Patients unwilling or unable to utilize the MEMs monitoring unit; 6) Pregnant or lactating women.
-
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
United States1 site
Orlando Regional Lucerne Hospital
Orlando, Florida, 32801
About this study
Official title: Compliance With Once-Daily Divalproex Extended-Release Tablets (Depakote-ER) Versus Multiple-Daily Dose Valproic Acid Capsules (Depakene) in Epilepsy: A Randomized, Parallel, Prospectively-Controlled Outpatient Comparison
To determine, in a randomized, parallel open-label fashion, compliance rates between once-daily extended-release divalproex sodium tablets (Depakote-ER®, Abbott Labs) versus multiple-daily dose valproic acid capsules (Depakene®, Abbott Labs) in an epilepsy population.
Read the detailed description
x_ Prospective x__ Single-center __ Multicenter x__ Open-label __ Double-blind __ Single-blind x_ Randomized (please provide randomization ratio): 1:1 This population includes both patients whose seizures are relatively well- controlled on their present conventional, enteric-coated, twice-daily or three-times daily Divalproex sodium (Depakote®, [DR]) regimen. Patients on DR monotherapy are preferred, but not required. Partial onset seizures and primarily generalized seizures will both be represented in this study. Patients will be randomized in 1:1 fashion.
Group #1: 10 patients will be randomized to IR-VPA, to be taken 3 to 4 times a day, in a total daily dose equivalent to DR. The dosing regimen will likely be taken at meal times for those receiving IR-VPA tid (not q 8 h), and additionally at bedtime for those on a QID (not q 6 h) regimen. The choice of TID vs QID regimen will be dictated by the patients' total daily dose requirements, with the attempt to keep the number of 250 mg capsules identical for each dose throughout the day.
Group #2: 10 patients will be randomized to ER, to be taken once-daily in the AM or PM at the investigator's discretion and patient's choice, since dosing ER in the AM or PM does not substantially differ as to plasma VPA concentrations [17]. Once AM or PM once-daily ER dosing is chosen for a patient, it will not be changed. ER once-daily dosing will incorporate the recommended dose-proportional increase of 8-20% in total daily dose over that of DR for patients with epilepsy (18). However, only one tablet strength (500 mg ER) will be utilized, so total daily dose will be rounded to the nearest 500 mg increment.
A total of 20 patients should provide sufficient power (80%) to adequately detect a statistically (p < 0.05) and clinically meaningful change in compliance rate between the groups, if one exists.
Compliance and precision will both be measure in this short-term study. Compliance, defined as the number of times the multiple-daily IR-VPA dose or ER dose was actually taken vs that prescribed daily, will be tallied with a computer-chip recording device (MEMS unit [13]) and via the patient's daily diary / calendar. Precision, defined as the actual time the daily dose for ER was actually taken (or multiple-daily doses for IR-VPA were actually taken) compared to the prescribed times ( + 15 min), as documented by the MEMS unit.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
It will take 3 months to recruit #20 patients according to our protocol. The total protocol can last from 49 to 70 days. There will be up to a 21-day screening period per patient, followed by a 7-day period for the patient to practice the MEMS unit and gain familiarity and demonstrate competency with the device. After randomization at Day 0, there will be 42 consecutive days of prospective evaluation.
From the end of study, the time to first abstract / manuscript submitted: 2 months x__Abstract/manuscript/ poster assistance is anticipated
Washout period: N/A Screening Period: 0 to 21 days prior to baseline observation. Baseline observation period: 7 days prior to randomization. This period allows the patient to practice with the MEMS unit, gaining familiarity with it and demonstrating competency with the device.
Treatment period: The treatment period is forty-two (# 42) days after Randomization.
A rapid, immediate conversion from multiple-daily dosed DR to once-daily divalproex-ER has been recommended for adults with epilepsy since it is a simple maneuver to understand with a low predicted chance for side effects (19). Likewise, patients randomized to the IR-VPA group will be immediately converted from DR to multiple-daily dose IR-VPA without tapering the DR or gradual titration upward of IR-VPA.
Taper period: N/A
Age: adults (16 and older) Gender: male/female Disease under study: Patients with a chronic, yet relatively stable partial and /or generalized seizure disorder will be included in this study.
Twenty patients currently currently undergoing treatment with enteric-coated divalproex [DR] for whom the treating physician elects to change to once-daily divalproex-ER will be candidates for this study. Ten patients will be assigned to each group randomly, which should yield sufficient power to make a definite statement regarding the best conversion strategy to use in this patient population.
XX__ Depakote® Tablets (for Lead-in) XX__ Depakote® ER
- No Drug Required __ Depakote® Sprinkle
- Depacon® XX_Depakene® Capsules Lead-in: Patients with epilepsy who are already being treated with conventional, enteric-coated, delayed-release Depakote ([DR]). Patients on DR monotherapy are preferred, but patients may be taking additional AEDs.
ACTIVE: Depakote-ER. For those randomized to this group, an 8-20% mg dose increase will be utilized in DR to ER conversion, as recommended by the Divalproex-ER package insert (Abbott) and based upon published evidence for the need to compensate for the lesser bioavailability of ER. Only 500 mg ER tablets will be used, such that total daily dose will be rounded to the nearest 500 mg.
ACTIVE COMPARATOR: Depakene Capsules. Depakene is a liquid-filled capsule containing 250 mg IR-VPA. The same total daily dose of IR-VPA as DR will be utilized. IR-VPA will be given TID (not q 8 h) or QID (not q 6 h), depending upon which regimen allows for an identical number of capsules to be given for each dose.
Note: Compliance and precision will only be recorded for either ER or IR-VPA, not for other AEDS, in those patients who happen to be taking concomitant AEDs.
- Patients, age 16 and above, currently taking Divalproex-DR for any seizure disorder; 2) Other AEDs are permitted concurrently, although compliance with these will not be recorded. Other medications for co-morbid disease are permitted, provided no plans for changes in medications used for the treatment of the concomitant disorder are expected.
- Patients must demonstrate a 75% or greater compliance rate with DR via calendar during the week of familiarity with the MEMs unit. The threshold value of 75% has been chosen since research shows that people take approximately 75% of their AED(s) as prescribed (13,14), and the same numerical value is frequently used in determining whether or not to retain a patient in clinical Phase 2a-3b industry-sponsored study.
- patients with a recent history of status epilepticus;
- patients who have refractory or unstable epilepsy;
- patients with acute illnesses requiring changes in concurrent drugs;
- patients unwilling to change from their present DR regimen to divalproex-ER or IR-VPA.
- Patients unwilling or unable to utilize the MEMs monitoring unit;
- Pregnant or lactating women.
IRB approval will be sought. After the appropriate IRB approval, written, informed consent will be obtained for all patients participating.
Patients in either Group will be instructed to take their ER or IR-VPA according to the PI's usual practice, without different or special coaching or prompting techniques to enhance compliance throughout the study.
Patients will be observed closely by physicians and allied health personnel on a weekly basis, by actual visit to the study center (Days 0, +14, +28 \& +42 and via phone on Days +7, +21 \& +35. Blood work, including CBC, platelet counts, LFTs, serum chemistry panel and total valproate will be measured prior to and at the end of the study on Day +42 post-randomization.
Criteria for premature discontinuation for safety reasons:
- Patients who pass screening but who do not demonstrate proficiency or competence with the MEMs monitoring unit for the 7-day period prior to randomization;
- Patients with a 50% increase in seizure frequency compared to their historic baseline, or the development of seizures requiring hospitalization at any time during the study;
- Patients with a clinically significant increase in the number or severity of AEs, as determined by the investigator;
- Patients with a MEMs (if data is immediately accessible and available) or calendar-documented compliance rate of < 35% at any time during the study.
- Patients with a MEMs (if data is immediately accessible and available) or calendar-documented compliance rate between > 35% and < 75% on three separate occasions or two consecutive occasions during the study.
Primary Measures:
The primary efficacy parameter will be the difference in mean compliance rate (defined as the # does taken divided by the # doses prescribed) for the ER vs IR-VPA group at Day + 42.
Secondary Measures:
- The change in compliance rate from Day 0 to Day +42 will be compared for both groups; 2) The precision of dose administration, determined by the number of doses administered within + 15 min of their assigned times will be compared for all dose times over the course of the study between the two groups; 3) Drop out rates for both groups, due to lack of seizure control, adverse effects or noncompliance, will be compared between groups. x_Statistical analysis assistance may be required
None foreseen. Patients selected for this study will only be those who, upon recommendations or orders from their physician, will be switched from multiple-daily dose of divalproex-DR to the divalproex extended-release formulation, administered once-daily or to IR-VPA.
This project is considered "research" by virtue of the randomization of epilepsy patients to two different groups, utilizing dosage formulations and regimens commonly encountered in clinical practice.
- Conditions
- Epilepsy
- Being tested
- Compliance
- Keywords
- Epilepsy, Compliance
- Medical subject headings
- Epilepsy, Patient Compliance
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
ComplianceBehavioural
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted25 Jul 2006 (estimated)
- Study startJul 2006
- Study completionMay 2007
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for EpilepsyStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Observational
- Observational model
- Other
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Enrolment
- 5 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Orlando Health, Inc.
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Abbott
- Investigators
- Jane Boggs, MD, Principal investigator, Physician
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00356018
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 3D20-2006
- Status last verified
- Mar 2020
- First submitted
- 21 Jul 2006
- Last updated
- 4 Mar 2020
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 4 Mar 2020. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Compliance With Once-Daily Divalproex Extended-Release Tablets (Depakote-ER) Versus Multiple-Daily Dose Valproic Acid Capsules (Depakene) in Epilepsy: A Randomized, Parallel, Prospectively-Controlled Outpatient Comparison
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00356018
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 3D20-2006
- Conditions
- Epilepsy
- Keywords
- Epilepsy, Compliance
- Study type
- Observational
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 5 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Orlando Health, Inc.University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Abbott
- Study start
- Jul 2006
- Study completion
- May 2007
- First posted
- 25 Jul 2006 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
To determine, in a randomized, parallel open-label fashion, compliance rates between once-daily extended-release divalproex sodium tablets (Depakote-ER®, Abbott Labs) versus multiple-daily dose valproic acid capsules (Depakene®, Abbott Labs) in an epilepsy population.
Detailed description
x_ Prospective x__ Single-center __ Multicenter x__ Open-label __ Double-blind __ Single-blind x_ Randomized (please provide randomization ratio): 1:1 This population includes both patients whose seizures are relatively well- controlled on their present conventional, enteric-coated, twice-daily or three-times daily Divalproex sodium (Depakote®, [DR]) regimen. Patients on DR monotherapy are preferred, but not required. Partial onset seizures and primarily generalized seizures will both be represented in this study. Patients will be randomized in 1:1 fashion.
Group #1: 10 patients will be randomized to IR-VPA, to be taken 3 to 4 times a day, in a total daily dose equivalent to DR. The dosing regimen will likely be taken at meal times for those receiving IR-VPA tid (not q 8 h), and additionally at bedtime for those on a QID (not q 6 h) regimen. The choice of TID vs QID regimen will be dictated by the patients' total daily dose requirements, with the attempt to keep the number of 250 mg capsules identical for each dose throughout the day.
Group #2: 10 patients will be randomized to ER, to be taken once-daily in the AM or PM at the investigator's discretion and patient's choice, since dosing ER in the AM or PM does not substantially differ as to plasma VPA concentrations [17]. Once AM or PM once-daily ER dosing is chosen for a patient, it will not be changed. ER once-daily dosing will incorporate the recommended dose-proportional increase of 8-20% in total daily dose over that of DR for patients with epilepsy (18). However, only one tablet strength (500 mg ER) will be utilized, so total daily dose will be rounded to the nearest 500 mg increment.
A total of 20 patients should provide sufficient power (80%) to adequately detect a statistically (p < 0.05) and clinically meaningful change in compliance rate between the groups, if one exists.
Compliance and precision will both be measure in this short-term study. Compliance, defined as the number of times the multiple-daily IR-VPA dose or ER dose was actually taken vs that prescribed daily, will be tallied with a computer-chip recording device (MEMS unit [13]) and via the patient's daily diary / calendar. Precision, defined as the actual time the daily dose for ER was actually taken (or multiple-daily doses for IR-VPA were actually taken) compared to the prescribed times ( + 15 min), as documented by the MEMS unit.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
It will take 3 months to recruit #20 patients according to our protocol. The total protocol can last from 49 to 70 days. There will be up to a 21-day screening period per patient, followed by a 7-day period for the patient to practice the MEMS unit and gain familiarity and demonstrate competency with the device. After randomization at Day 0, there will be 42 consecutive days of prospective evaluation.
From the end of study, the time to first abstract / manuscript submitted: 2 months x__Abstract/manuscript/ poster assistance is anticipated
Washout period: N/A Screening Period: 0 to 21 days prior to baseline observation. Baseline observation period: 7 days prior to randomization. This period allows the patient to practice with the MEMS unit, gaining familiarity with it and demonstrating competency with the device.
Treatment period: The treatment period is forty-two (# 42) days after Randomization.
A rapid, immediate conversion from multiple-daily dosed DR to once-daily divalproex-ER has been recommended for adults with epilepsy since it is a simple maneuver to understand with a low predicted chance for side effects (19). Likewise, patients randomized to the IR-VPA group will be immediately converted from DR to multiple-daily dose IR-VPA without tapering the DR or gradual titration upward of IR-VPA.
Taper period: N/A
Age: adults (16 and older) Gender: male/female Disease under study: Patients with a chronic, yet relatively stable partial and /or generalized seizure disorder will be included in this study.
Twenty patients currently currently undergoing treatment with enteric-coated divalproex [DR] for whom the treating physician elects to change to once-daily divalproex-ER will be candidates for this study. Ten patients will be assigned to each group randomly, which should yield sufficient power to make a definite statement regarding the best conversion strategy to use in this patient population.
XX__ Depakote® Tablets (for Lead-in) XX__ Depakote® ER
- No Drug Required __ Depakote® Sprinkle
- Depacon® XX_Depakene® Capsules Lead-in: Patients with epilepsy who are already being treated with conventional, enteric-coated, delayed-release Depakote ([DR]). Patients on DR monotherapy are preferred, but patients may be taking additional AEDs.
ACTIVE: Depakote-ER. For those randomized to this group, an 8-20% mg dose increase will be utilized in DR to ER conversion, as recommended by the Divalproex-ER package insert (Abbott) and based upon published evidence for the need to compensate for the lesser bioavailability of ER. Only 500 mg ER tablets will be used, such that total daily dose will be rounded to the nearest 500 mg.
ACTIVE COMPARATOR: Depakene Capsules. Depakene is a liquid-filled capsule containing 250 mg IR-VPA. The same total daily dose of IR-VPA as DR will be utilized. IR-VPA will be given TID (not q 8 h) or QID (not q 6 h), depending upon which regimen allows for an identical number of capsules to be given for each dose.
Note: Compliance and precision will only be recorded for either ER or IR-VPA, not for other AEDS, in those patients who happen to be taking concomitant AEDs.
- Patients, age 16 and above, currently taking Divalproex-DR for any seizure disorder; 2) Other AEDs are permitted concurrently, although compliance with these will not be recorded. Other medications for co-morbid disease are permitted, provided no plans for changes in medications used for the treatment of the concomitant disorder are expected.
- Patients must demonstrate a 75% or greater compliance rate with DR via calendar during the week of familiarity with the MEMs unit. The threshold value of 75% has been chosen since research shows that people take approximately 75% of their AED(s) as prescribed (13,14), and the same numerical value is frequently used in determining whether or not to retain a patient in clinical Phase 2a-3b industry-sponsored study.
- patients with a recent history of status epilepticus;
- patients who have refractory or unstable epilepsy;
- patients with acute illnesses requiring changes in concurrent drugs;
- patients unwilling to change from their present DR regimen to divalproex-ER or IR-VPA.
- Patients unwilling or unable to utilize the MEMs monitoring unit;
- Pregnant or lactating women.
IRB approval will be sought. After the appropriate IRB approval, written, informed consent will be obtained for all patients participating.
Patients in either Group will be instructed to take their ER or IR-VPA according to the PI's usual practice, without different or special coaching or prompting techniques to enhance compliance throughout the study.
Patients will be observed closely by physicians and allied health personnel on a weekly basis, by actual visit to the study center (Days 0, +14, +28 \& +42 and via phone on Days +7, +21 \& +35. Blood work, including CBC, platelet counts, LFTs, serum chemistry panel and total valproate will be measured prior to and at the end of the study on Day +42 post-randomization.
Criteria for premature discontinuation for safety reasons:
- Patients who pass screening but who do not demonstrate proficiency or competence with the MEMs monitoring unit for the 7-day period prior to randomization;
- Patients with a 50% increase in seizure frequency compared to their historic baseline, or the development of seizures requiring hospitalization at any time during the study;
- Patients with a clinically significant increase in the number or severity of AEs, as determined by the investigator;
- Patients with a MEMs (if data is immediately accessible and available) or calendar-documented compliance rate of < 35% at any time during the study.
- Patients with a MEMs (if data is immediately accessible and available) or calendar-documented compliance rate between > 35% and < 75% on three separate occasions or two consecutive occasions during the study.
Primary Measures:
The primary efficacy parameter will be the difference in mean compliance rate (defined as the # does taken divided by the # doses prescribed) for the ER vs IR-VPA group at Day + 42.
Secondary Measures:
- The change in compliance rate from Day 0 to Day +42 will be compared for both groups; 2) The precision of dose administration, determined by the number of doses administered within + 15 min of their assigned times will be compared for all dose times over the course of the study between the two groups; 3) Drop out rates for both groups, due to lack of seizure control, adverse effects or noncompliance, will be compared between groups. x_Statistical analysis assistance may be required
None foreseen. Patients selected for this study will only be those who, upon recommendations or orders from their physician, will be switched from multiple-daily dose of divalproex-DR to the divalproex extended-release formulation, administered once-daily or to IR-VPA.
This project is considered "research" by virtue of the randomization of epilepsy patients to two different groups, utilizing dosage formulations and regimens commonly encountered in clinical practice.
Study design
- Observational model
- Other
- Time perspective
- Prospective
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 16 to 99 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Child, Adult, Older adult
- Study population
- The population includes both patients whose seizures are relatively well controlled on their present conventional, enteric-coated twice-daily or three-times daily Divalproex sodium regimen.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Compliance | Behavioural | – |
Primary outcome
Not reported in the source record.
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 4 Mar 2020.
Related trials for Epilepsy
Not yet recruiting
Clinical Trial of SEEG for Drug-resistant Epilepsy
Drug-Resistant Epilepsy
RecruitingPhase 3
Investigate Efficacy and Safety of Carisbamate as Adjunctive Treatment for Seizures Associated With LGS in Children and Adults
Seizures, Lennox Gastaut Syndrome
RecruitingPhase 3
Study Evaluating the Efficacy and Safety of RAP-219 in Adult Participants With Focal Seizures
Focal Seizure, Epilepsy
Active, not recruitingObservational study
Transforming Research and Clinical Knowledge in Traumatic Brain Injury Epileptogenesis Project (TRACK-TBI EPI)
Traumatic Brain Injury, Post-traumatic Epilepsy
RecruitingPhase 3
Study Evaluating the Efficacy and Safety of RAP-219 in Adult Participants With Focal Seizures FOCUS-1
Focal Seizure, Epilepsy
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Jane Boggs, MD principal investigator
Physician
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
An observational study of Epilepsy, run by Orlando Health, Inc. at 1 site in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 4 Mar 2020. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 4 Mar 2020.