AzTrials
AzTrials

Bone Diseases, MetabolicPhase 4NCT00357331

The Effects of Potassium Citrate on Bone Metabolism

A Phase 4 study testing potassium citrate in people with Bone Diseases, Metabolic and Osteoporosis, Postmenopausal, run by Weill Medical College of Cornell University at 1 site in United States.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Skeletal buffering of chronic acid loads may contribute to a significant amount of bone loss over time. Evidence from a few small short-term studies suggests that basic compounds, namely potassium citrate and potassium bicarbonate may reduce bone loss and improve bone density. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 45 to 75 years, women onlyHealthy volunteers can take part
What is being tested?
potassium citrate
Type of treatment
Pill or oral medicine
Could I receive a placebo?
Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
How many people
83 participants
Where
1 siteUnited States
Study dates
Aug 2006to Apr 2011
Phase
Phase 4
Are there results?
Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 45 to 75 years
  • Women only
  • Healthy volunteers accepted
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Postmenopausal women, more than 2 years post menopause
  • Osteopenia, defined as a T score at the lumbar spine or total hip between -1.0 and -2.5
  • No history of prior fragility fracture

Who cannot join

  • Renal insufficiency
  • Use of potassium sparing diuretics
  • Use of potassium supplements
  • Hyperkalemia
  • Secondary causes of osteoporosis or metabolic bone disease
  • Delayed gastric emptying
Show all 9Show fewer
  • esophageal compression, intestinal obstruction or stricture
  • use of anticholinergic medication
  • active urinary tract infection.

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

United States1 site
  • Weill Cornell Medical College

    New York, New York, 10021

Other trials in United States

About this study

Official title: A Randomized Placebo Controlled Double Blind Investigation of the Effects of Potassium Citrate on Bone Metabolism in Postmenopausal Osteopenia

Skeletal buffering of chronic acid loads may contribute to a significant amount of bone loss over time. Evidence from a few small short-term studies suggests that basic compounds, namely potassium citrate and potassium bicarbonate may reduce bone loss and improve bone density.

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the effects of potassium citrate on bone metabolism. We hypothesize that administration of potassium citrate to postmenopausal women with osteopenia will reduce bone resorption and improve bone mineral density.

Postmenopausal women with osteopenia (T score between -1.0 and -2.5) and no history of fracture will be randomized to either daily potassium citrate or placebo for one year. Primary outcomes will be markers of bone turnover, which will be measured over 12 months. Secondary outcomes will be bone mineral density, compliance, and adverse events.

Read the detailed description

Participants were recruited from a single academic center. Subjects underwent screening at the Clinical Translational Science Center (CTSC) at Weill Cornell Medical College (WCMC). Study visits occurred at the CTSC where investigators administered and monitored questionnaires, compliance, adverse events, and endpoint measurements. Subjects were assigned an anonymous study number at the beginning of the trial, which was used to track the participant's data throughout the study. The protocol was approved by the Institutional Review Board (IRB) and the procedures followed were in accordance with the ethical standards of the IRB and the CTSC. All patients provided informed consent.

Treatment Groups Participants were assigned to either the treatment or placebo group using a randomization schema generated by the statistician. The randomization method was blocked randomization with a blocking factor of 4. The blocked randomization was not stratified by any other factors. The study was conducted in a double blind manner. The study medication, K-citrate, or placebo, was dispensed through the New York Presbyterian Hospital (NYPH) pharmacy. Bottles in the pharmacy were sequentially numbered and the number was linked to the blocked randomization scheme. Only the statistician and the pharmacist knew the meaning of the numbered codes and only the statistician knew the blocking assignment. Blocked randomization with balanced randomization of each block and blocks of the same size was performed by the RANDOM procedure within the WinPepi Version 11.1.

Investigators who administered questionnaires and assessed compliance, adverse effects or endpoint information were blind to group assignment. Only study investigators were able to enroll participants in the study and assign them to treatment arms. Those assigned to the treatment group received the study drug (40 mEq daily K Citrate: two 10 mEq tablets twice daily); those assigned to the control group received inert tablets of the same quantity. All participants received daily supplementation with Citracal (630 mg calcium citrate and 400 IU vitamin D3 per two caplets). All supplements and medications were provided by Mission Pharmacal/Bayer Pharmaceuticals in Boerne, Texas. Subjects discontinued their prior supplements at the time of entry to the study and were advised to adhere to the standardized supplementation regimen outlined by the protocol.

Measurements and Outcomes Subjects were evaluated at baseline, 1, 3, 6, and 12 months. The following outcomes were measured: change in bone turnover markers including u-NTX, BSAP, OC and P1NP; changes in 24 hour urinary concentrations of citrate, sulfate, and calcium; and changes in BMD measured from baseline to 12 months. Adverse events and compliance were measured at each visit over the study duration. Adverse events pertained to medication side effects, including, but not limited to, gastrointestinal complaints, nausea, diarrhea, and stomach pain, as well as the development of hyperkalemia or metabolic acidosis. If any of the following occurred, potassium exceeded 5.2 mmol/L; bicarbonate level exceeded 32 mmol/L; creatinine increased by more than 30% or rose above 2.0 ng/dL; or GFR was < 60, study medications were stopped until the parameter normalized, at which point the medication was resumed at half dose: Compliance was assessed by remaining pill count; good compliance was defined at ≤ 20% of pills remaining, or ≤ 18 pills remaining for each 3-month dose allocation.

Baseline measurements included dietary assessment (block food frequency questionnaire) and blood pressure. Laboratory evaluation was performed at the General Core Laboratory at WCMC and included a basic metabolic panel, calcium, albumin and thyroid stimulating hormone (TSH). 25-OH and 1,25(OH)2 Vitamin D were measured by radioimmunoassay (Immunodiagnostic Systems, Scottsdale, Arizona). The interassay coefficient of variation (CV) was <8.2% and <13%, respectively. Intact parathyroid hormone (i-PTH) was measured by immunoradiometric assay (Scantibodies Laboratories, Santee, California; CV <6.4%). Markers of bone turnover included osteocalcin (OC: quantitative immunoradiometric assay, DiaSorin, Stillwater, Minnesota; CV <9.5%) , bone specific alkaline phosphatase (BSAP: solid phase monoclonal antibody immunoenzymetric assay, Immunodiagnostics Systems, Scottsdale, Arizona; CV<6.4%), procollagen type 1 amino-terminal propeptide (P1NP: quantitative radioimmunoassay, Orion Diagnostica, Espoo, Finland; CV<9.8%), urinary N-telopeptide (U-NTX: quantitative enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay kit, Wampole Laboratories INC Princeton, New Jersey; CV<5.0%). All specimens were collected as fasting morning samples. The urinary-NTX was a second morning void. The specimens were frozen and batch analyzed. 24 hour urinary collections for calcium, creatinine, sulfate, citrate and sodium were analyzed at Quest Diagnostics. BMD was performed at lumbar spine, total hip and femoral neck using dual-energy X-ray Absorptiometry (DXA) Hologic; Bedford, Massachusetts. The least significant change (LSC) for the DXA was 0.025 at the lumbar spine, 0.025 at the femoral neck and 0.015 at the radius. Two technologists, both certified by the International Society for Clinical Densitometry, performed all DXA testing on the participants.

Being tested
potassium citrate
Keywords
postmenopausal osteopenia, treatment, bone loss
Medical subject headings
Bone Diseases, Metabolic, Osteoporosis, Postmenopausal

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • potassium citrateDrug

    Also called uro cit

    20 meq by mouth in capsule form twice daily

Study groups in NCT00357331
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Potassium CitrateExperimentalPotassium Citrate 20 meq twice daily
Receives: Drug: potassium citrate
PlaceboPlacebo comparatorPlacebo
Receives: Drug: potassium citrate

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Urinary-N-telopeptide

    One measure of bone turnover was urinary-NTX as a second void morning urine.

    Measured: Baseline,1,3,6,12 months

  2. P1NP (Amino-terminal Propeptide of Type I Procollagen)

    One measure of bone turnover was P1NP as a morning lab draw.

    Measured: Baseline,1,3,6,12 months

Secondary outcomes (1)
  1. Number of Participants With Stable Bone Mineral Density (BMD) Over 12 Months at All Sites.

    BMD was performed at lumbar spine, total hip and femoral neck using dual-energy X-ray Absorptiometry (DXA) Hologic; Bedford, Massachusetts.

    Measured: 1 year

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted27 Jul 2006 (estimated)
  2. Study startAug 2006
  3. Primary completionApr 2011
  4. Study completionApr 2011

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 4
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Model description
Double Blind Placebo Controlled Trial
Masking
Triple blind
Who is masked
Participant, Investigator, Outcomes assessor
Enrolment
83 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT00357331
Sponsor's protocol ID
0604008486
Status last verified
May 2017
First submitted
25 Jul 2006
Last updated
12 Jun 2017
Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
Yes
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No

Publications

  • Gregory NS, Kumar R, Stein EM, Alexander E, Christos P, Bockman RS, Rodman JS. POTASSIUM CITRATE DECREASES BONE RESORPTION IN POSTMENOPAUSAL WOMEN WITH OSTEOPENIA: A RANDOMIZED, DOUBLE-BLIND CLINICAL TRIAL. Endocr Pract. 2015 Dec;21(12):1380-6. doi: 10.4158/EP15738.OR. Epub 2015 Sep 24.

    PubMed 26401577

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 4 study testing potassium citrate in people with Bone Diseases, Metabolic and Osteoporosis, Postmenopausal, run by Weill Medical College of Cornell University at 1 site in United States.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 9 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 12 Jun 2017. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this phase mean?

Phase 4 studies take place after a treatment is approved, to learn more about its long-term benefits and risks in everyday use.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 12 Jun 2017). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Urinary-N-telopeptide (time frame: Baseline,1,3,6,12 months). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT00357331, which also lists 1 linked publication.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 12 Jun 2017.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in