AzTrials
AzTrials

Coinfection With Hepatitis B Virus and Hepatitis C VirusNCT00361179

Long Term Effects of Peginterferon Alfa-2a Plus Ribavirin for Chronic Hepatitis C/B Co-Infection and Chronic Hepatitis C

An observational study of Coinfection With Hepatitis B Virus and Hepatitis C Virus and Monoinfection With Hepatitis C Virus, run by National Taiwan University Hospital at 1 site in China.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Chronic hepatitis C may relapse in simple chronic hepatitis C patients who initially obtained sustained virologic responses. Although the HCV SVR could be maintained in around 90%, the remaining 10% of these patients may develop hepatitis C relapse during follow-up. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
How many people
320 participants
Where
1 siteChina
Study dates
May 2006to Dec 2011
Phase
Observational
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Patients who were randomized, treated and returned for follow up in the ML17862 protocol will be eligible for inclusion in this protocol

Who cannot join

  • Patients unwilling to provide informed consent or abide by the requirements of the study.
  • Patients who have already initiated anti-HCV or HBV treatment, approved or investigational since completion of the original protocol

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

China1 site
  • Pei-Jer Chen

    Taipei City, Taiwan, 100

Other trials in China

About this study

Official title: An Extension, Observational Protocol to Evaluate the Long Term Effects of Peginterferon Alfa-2a Plus Ribavirin for Chronic Hepatitis C/B Co-Infection and Chronic Hepatitis C in the Original Study ML17862

Chronic hepatitis C may relapse in simple chronic hepatitis C patients who initially obtained sustained virologic responses. Although the HCV SVR could be maintained in around 90%, the remaining 10% of these patients may develop hepatitis C relapse during follow-up. Therefore, it is important to follow up the long-term of these patients with dual chronic hepatitis B and C.

From another aspect, for the treatment of chronic hepatitis B, the virologic and serologic responses may also not be durable. Alternatively, previous studies suggested that the therapeutic efficacy might not be seen in the study period, and incremental response might occur during long-term follow-up. Therefore it is also important to clarify the long-term outcome of treatment in this dually infected population.

Evaluation of the long term effects of treatment with peginterferon alfa-2a plus ribavirin for patients with chronic hepatitis C/ hepatitis B co-Infection and chronic hepatitis C in the original study ML17862 is important. This present protocol is thus to assess whether the HCV SVR is sustained and to assess the durability of the HBV virologic and serologic responses or any incremental response during a 5-year follow-up period, including six months after end of the therapy in the original study and an additional 4 and half years in this project (5 years overall follow-up after the end of treatment). Specifically, we wish to assess the (1) sustained virologic response (SVR) of HCV in both populations, (2) incidence of HBsAg loss and HBsAg seroconversion (HBsAg loss and appearance of anti-HBs) in dually infected population, (3) ALT normalization or flare off-treatment during both populations, (4) reductions of HCV RNA from the original baseline levels in the two patient populations, and (5) reduction of serum HBV DNA off-treatment in the dually infected population.

Read the detailed description

Pegylated IFNs (such as PEG-IFN alfa-2a, PEGASYS®) have been shown to possess a superior efficacy and convenience to conventional IFNs, either alone or in combination with RBV in patients with chronic hepatitis C only [Zeuzem et al, 2000; Heathcote et al, 2000; Fried et al, 2002; Hadziyannis et al, EASL 2002]. For patients with chronic hepatitis B, pilot study also revealed that the biochemical and virologic responses were better in HBeAg-positive patients receiving pegylated IFN than those receiving conventional IFN [24-week post-treatment combined virologic, HBeAg loss, and ALT normalization rate: 28% vs. 12%; Lai et al, APSAL 2002].

The efficacy using a 24-week combination therapy in the sustained clearance of serum HCV RNA is equivalent to that using a 48-week combination therapy in patients with HCV genotype non-1 [Hadziyannis et al, EASL 2002]. A 48-week course of pegylated IFN and RBV combination therapy, in contrast, has been shown to yield a better efficacy in the sustained clearance of serum HCV RNA in patients with HCV genotype 1 than a 24-week combination therapy in western countries [SVR: 40~51% vs. 29~41%, Table 1, Hadziyannis et al, EASL 2002; Poynard et al, 1998]. Based on these findings, NIH Consensus Statement suggests that patients with genotype 1 need 48 weeks of combination treatment and standard doses of RBV [NIH 2002]. Previous study revealed that a 12-week RBV therapy was not effective for patients with chronic hepatitis B [Kakumu et al, 1993]. Therefore, in this proposal, the treatment duration will be 24 weeks for HCV genotype 2/3, and will be 48 weeks for HCV genotype 1, in patients with monoinfected chronic hepatitis C and dual chronic hepatitis C and B.

Increased RBV dosage has been considered as a contributory factor to the better efficacy in some previous studies. Recent studies suggested that using RBV 800 mg daily is adequate to treatment HCV genotype non-1 but standard dosage of RBV is required to treatment HCV genotype 1 [NIH 2002]. We follow the recommendations and use RBV 800 mg daily for HCV genotype non-1, both in dually infected patients and in monoinfected chronic hepatitis C patients. RBV with 1000-1200 mg daily will be used for HCV genotype 1 according the body weight of the patient, both in dually infected patients and in monoinfected chronic hepatitis C patients.

Previous studies suggested that chronic hepatitis C may relapse in simple chronic hepatitis C patients who initially obtained sustained virologic responses at 6 months after end of the treatment [Chemello et al, 1996; Marcellin et al, 1997]. Although the HCV SVR could be maintained in around 90%, the remaining 10% of these patients may develop hepatitis C relapse during follow-up. Chemello et al followed up 107 patients with chronic hepatitis C who maintained normal aminotransferase levels as long as 12 months after interferon-alpha therapy [Chemello et al, 1996]. Hepatitis C virus RNA was detected in 27 (25%) patients with sustained biochemical response; 80 (75%) patients were negative for HCV RNA. Patients positive for HCV RNA were older (P < 0.001), had received a smaller interferon-alpha dose (P = 0.02), and were more frequently infected with HCV genotype 2 (P < 0.01). Liver histologic findings were active in 57% of patients positive for HCV RNA, despite normal alanine aminotransferase levels, compared with only 12% of patients who were negative for HCV RNA (P = 0.01). The estimated probability of hepatitis relapse by 4 years after therapy was 53% in viremic patients and 0% in patients negative for HCV RNA (P < 0.001). Marcellin et al followed up 80 patients who had chronic hepatitis C and received interferon-alpha therapy [Marcellin et al, 1997]. The 80 patients had follow-up 1 to 7.6 years (mean +/- SD, 4.0 +/- 2.0 years) after interferon-alpha treatment. The follow-up period was 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, and more than 6 years in 11, 13, 14, 18, 10, 12, and 2 patients, respectively, after the end of therapy. During the entire follow-up period, 93% (95% CI, 84% to 97%) of patients had persistently normal serum ALT levels. Serum HCV RNA remained undetectable in 96% (CI, 89% to 99%) of patients. A comparison of liver histologic findings before and 1 to 6.2 years after interferon-alpha treatment showed a clear improvement in 94% (CI, 83% to 99%) of patients. In 62% of patients, the last biopsy done showed normal or nearly normal histologic findings. Liver HCV RNA was detectable before treatment in all 13 patients tested and was undetectable 1 to 5 years after treatment in all 27 patients tested. They thus concluded that in patients with chronic hepatitis C who have persistently normal serum ALT levels and no detectable serum HCV RNA 6 months after interferon-alpha therapy, long-term sustained biochemical and virologic response is generally seen. Similar finding was noted in one reported case with dual chronic hepatitis B and C [Yalcin et al, 2003]. To be noted, this dually infected patient had reactivation of hepatitis B accompanied by severe flare of hepatitis activity during treatment and had relapse of hepatitis C after end of the treatment. Therefore, it is important to follow up the long-term of these patients with dual chronic hepatitis B and C.

From another aspect, for the treatment of chronic hepatitis B, the virologic and serologic responses may also not be durable [Liaw et al, 2005; Lok et al, 2004; Hadziyannis et al, 2003; Janssen et al, 2005]. Alternatively, previous studies suggested that the therapeutic efficacy might not be seen in the study period, and incremental response might occur during long-term follow-up as learned from previous experiences of using antiviral agents including interferon for the treatment of chronic hepatitis B [Saruc et al, 2003; Carreno et al, 2001]. Therefore it is also important to clarify the long-term outcome of treatment in this dually infected population.

This present protocol is thus to assess whether the HCV SVR is sustained and to assess the durability of the HBV virologic and serologic responses or any incremental response during a 5-year follow-up period, including six months after end of the therapy in the original study and an additional 4 and half years in this project (5 years overall follow-up after the end of treatment). Specifically, we wish to assess the (1) sustained virologic response (SVR) of HCV in both populations, (2) incidence of HBsAg loss and HBsAg seroconversion (HBsAg loss and appearance of anti-HBs) in dually infected population, (3) ALT normalization or flare off-treatment during both populations, (4) reductions of HCV RNA from the original baseline levels in the two patient populations, and (5) reduction of serum HBV DNA off-treatment in the dually infected population.

Keywords
Observation, Post-treatment
Medical subject headings
Hepatitis C

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted7 Aug 2006 (estimated)
  2. Study startMay 2006
  3. Study completionDec 2011

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Observational
Observational model
Defined population
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrolment
320 participants
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT00361179
Sponsor's protocol ID
9561706020
Status last verified
Aug 2006
First submitted
4 Aug 2006
Last updated
7 Aug 2006
Results posted
No

Publications

  • Liu CJ, Chuang WL, Lee CM, Yu ML, Lu SN, Wu SS, Liao LY, Chen CL, Kuo HT, Chao YC, Tung SY, Yang SS, Kao JH, Liu CH, Su WW, Lin CL, Jeng YM, Chen PJ, Chen DS. Peginterferon alfa-2a plus ribavirin for the treatment of dual chronic infection with hepatitis B and C viruses. Gastroenterology. 2009 Feb;136(2):496-504.e3. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2008.10.049. Epub 2008 Oct 29.

    PubMed 19084016

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

An observational study of Coinfection With Hepatitis B Virus and Hepatitis C Virus and Monoinfection With Hepatitis C Virus, run by National Taiwan University Hospital at 1 site in China.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 2 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 7 Aug 2006. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in China. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT00361179, which also lists 1 linked publication.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 7 Aug 2006.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in