AzTrials
AzTrials

HIV InfectionsPhase 2NCT00361257

Minocycline for the Treatment of Decreased Mental Function in HIV-Infected Adults

A Phase 2 study testing Minocycline in people with HIV Infections, run by Advancing Clinical Therapeutics Globally for HIV/AIDS and Other Infections at 16 sites in United States.

Terminated

Stopped early. The study ended before it was planned to and will not resume.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The purpose of this study is to determine the effectiveness of minocycline, an antibiotic, in lessening the decreased mental function sometimes caused by anti-HIV drugs. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 65 years
Conditions the study is for
HIV Infections
What is being tested?
Minocycline
Type of treatment
Pill or oral medicine
Could I receive a placebo?
Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
How many people
107 participants
Where
16 sitesUnited States
Study dates
Mar 2007to Jan 2010
Phase
Phase 2
Are there results?
Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 65 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • HIV infected
  • Currently on a stable ART regimen for at least 16 consecutive weeks prior to study entry. Participants whose regimens have changed with respect to dose or formulation are eligible, but patients who have changed to different drugs in the same class are not eligible. Participants taking atazanavir must also be taking ritonavir or a ritonavir-boosted drug to be eligible for this study. More information on this criterion can be found in the protocol.
  • Plan to stay on current ART regimen between study screening and Week 24
  • AIDS Dementia Scale (ADC) Stage greater than 0
  • Cognitive impairment, as evidenced by neuropsychological tests administered at screening
  • Progressive neurocognitive decline. More information on this criterion can be found in the protocol.
Show all 11Show fewer
  • Estimated premorbid IQ of 70 or higher indicated by an age-corrected scaled score of 5 or higher on the vocabulary section of the Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale Revised (WAIS-R) administered at study screening
  • Karnofsky performance score of 60 or higher
  • Ability to sit and stand for at least 2 hours and swallow medications with an 8-ounce glass of water
  • Willing to use acceptable methods of contraception
  • Willing to adhere to study schedule

Who cannot join

  • Current cancers. Patients with basal cell carcinoma, in situ carcinoma of the cervix, or Kaposi's sarcoma without evidence of visceral involvement or cancer not requiring systemic chemotherapy are not excluded.
  • Severe premorbid psychiatric illness, including schizophrenia and major depression, which, in the opinion of the investigator, may interfere with the study
  • Active symptomatic AIDS-defining opportunistic infection within 45 days prior to study entry
  • Previous or current confounding neurological disorders. More information on this criterion can be found in the protocol.
  • Central nervous system infections or cancers. More information on this criterion can be found in the protocol.
  • Systemic lupus
Show all 18Show fewer
  • Thyroid disease diagnosed within 24 weeks of study entry
  • Active drug or alcohol abuse that, in the opinion of the investigator, may interfere with the study
  • Serious illness requiring systemic treatment or hospitalization. Patients who complete therapy or are clinically stable on therapy are not excluded.
  • Investigational agents within 45 days prior to study entry. Patients taking expanded access drugs or drugs used in an ACTG protocol for HIV treatment or for HIV-associated complications that are not prohibited by this protocol are not excluded.
  • History of allergy/sensitivity to minocycline or other tetracyclines and their formulations
  • Any esophageal or other condition that would interfere with a patient's ability to swallow study medication
  • Participation in a previous clinical drug research trial of HIV-associated cognitive impairment. Patients who have had an objective decline in performance as defined by the protocol are not excluded.
  • Any other clinically significant condition or laboratory abnormality that, in the opinion of the investigator, would interfere with the study
  • Certain medications
  • Certain abnormal laboratory values. Patients who test positive on nonreactive rapid plasma reagin tests (RPR)are not excluded.
  • Inability to undergo lumbar punctures
  • Breastfeeding

Trial locations and contacts

16 sites in 1 country.

16 sites in 1 country

United States16 sites
  • The Ponce de Leon Ctr. CRS

    Atlanta, Georgia, 30308

  • Johns Hopkins School of Medicine

    Baltimore, Maryland, 21287-8106

  • Massachusetts General Hospital, Division of Infectious Diseases

    Boston, Massachusetts, 02114

  • University of North Carolina, AIDS Clinical Trials Unit

    Chapel Hill, North Carolina, 27514

  • Northwestern University CRS

    Chicago, Illinois, 60611

  • University of Colorado Health Science Center

    Denver, Colorado, 80262-3706

  • Henry Ford Hosp. CRS

    Detroit, Michigan, 48202

  • UCLA-David Geffen School of Medicine

    Los Angeles, California, 90035

  • NYU Med Ctr, Dept of Medicine

    New York, New York, 10016

  • University of Pennsylvania, ACTU

    Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 19104

  • The Research and Education Group - Portland CRS

    Portland, Oregon, 97209

  • Virginia Commonwealth Univ. Medical Ctr. CRS

    Richmond, Virginia, 23219

  • 1101 University of Rochester Medical Center, Division of Infectious Diseases

    Rochester, New York, 14642

  • University of California

    San Diego, California, 92103

  • Univ of Washington, Harborview Medical Ctr

    Seattle, Washington, 98104

  • Washington University

    St Louis, Missouri, 63108-2138

Other trials in United States

About this study

Official title: Phase II, Randomized, Placebo-Controlled, Double-Blind Study of Minocycline in the Treatment of HIV-Associated Cognitive Impairment

The purpose of this study is to determine the effectiveness of minocycline, an antibiotic, in lessening the decreased mental function sometimes caused by anti-HIV drugs.

Read the detailed description

Cognitive impairment, including disabling cognitive, behavioral, and social dysfunction, continues to be a major problem faced by HIV-infected people taking antiretroviral therapy (ART). Research is needed to develop treatment that can be given alongside ART to prevent or lessen cognitive impairment caused by ART. Minocycline, an antibiotic commonly used for the treatment of acne and rheumatoid arthritis, has demonstrated anti-inflammatory and neuroprotective properties in previous studies. This study will evaluate the effectiveness of 24-week therapy with minocycline in lessening the cognitive impairment of HIV infected adults taking ART.

This study will last at least 24 weeks and has two steps. Patients will be stratified by HIV viral load and their neurocognitive state at study screening. In Step I, patients will be randomly assigned to one of two groups. Group 1 participants will receive twice-daily minocycline for 24 weeks; Group 2 participants will receive placebo. At the end of Phase I, study participants will be offered to enter Step II; all participants in Step II will receive twice-daily minocycline for an additional 24 weeks.

There will be a total of 8 study visits: 5 visits for Step I (including the entry visit) and 3 visits for Step II. Medical history will occur at all visits. Blood collection will occur at all visits. Participants who have positive nonreactive rapid plasma regain (RPR) values at screening will have mandatory lumbar punctures; for those with negative serum RPR results lumbar punctures are optional. Participants who test positive for syphilis will also have a lumbar puncture at their discretion to determine if syphilis has affected the brain. A neurological exam, other neuropsychological, dementia, and depression scale assessments, and urine collection will occur at most visits. Patients will be asked to complete a questionnaire on daily living at study entry and Weeks 12 and 24. Patients who have a lumbar puncture at Week 24 will receive a phone call 2 to 5 days after the procedure to report any adverse effects. Some participants may also have an electrocardiogram (ECG) during the study. For participants not on atazanavir some procedures and sample collections are optional.

Conditions
HIV Infections
Being tested
Minocycline, Placebo (Tetracycline)
Keywords
Treatment Experienced
Medical subject headings
HIV Infections

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • MinocyclineDrug

    Tetracycline antibiotic, 100 mg taken orally every 12 hours

  • Placebo (Tetracycline)Drug

    Tetracycline antibiotic placebo, orally every 12 hours

Study groups in NCT00361257
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Arm 1: MinocyclineExperimental100 mg orally every 12 hours
Receives: Drug: Minocycline
Arm 2: Matching placeboPlacebo comparatororally every 12 hours
Receives: Drug: Placebo (Tetracycline)

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Change in Cognitive Performance Compared to Baseline

    Th cognitive performance is measured by NPZ-8. NPZ-8 is defined as the average of age and education adjusted z-scores of eight neuropsychological tests subcomponents in the neuropsychological test battery. These eight tests are:

    1. Grooved Pegboard Dominant Hand (GPD)
    2. Grooved Pegboard Non-dominant hand (GPN)
    3. Choice Reaction Time (CRT)
    4. Sequential Reaction Time (QRT)
    5. Timed Gait (TIG)
    6. Trail Making Part A (TMA)
    7. Trail Making Part B (TMB)
    8. Symbol Digit (SYD) The primary outcome is NPZ-8 score at week24 - NPZ-8 score at baseline.

    Measured: At baseline and week 24

Secondary outcomes (23)
  1. Change in Global Deficit Z-Score (GDS)

    GDS on the test battery is the simple average of all 14 individual deficit scores in the test battery, including Time Gait, Grooved Pegboard Test for the dominant and non-dominant hands, Trail Making Test parts A and B, Symbol Digit Test, simple and sequential reaction time - CalCAP, Hopkins Verbal Learning Test (Revised)- Learning, Delayed Recall and Recognition trials, and Stroop Color Interference Test-color, word, and interference tasks. The outcome is the 24 week change of GDS Z-score (24 week-baseline).

    Measured: At baseline and week 24

  2. Change in Investigator's Clinical Global Impression Score (ICGIS)

    Clinicians were asked to rate their overall impression about the clinical improvement or worsening of his/her study participants. They can choose from the following 7 levels: (0) No Change, (1) Mild Improvement, (2) Moderate Improvement, (3) Marked Improvement, (4) Mild Worsening, (5) Moderate Worsening, and (6) Marked Worsening.

    For the analysis, we simplified the outcome into the following 3 levels: (0) worsened, (1) No Change, and (2) Improved.

    Measured: At week 24

  3. Change in Cognitive Gross Motor Function Domain Z-Score

    The cognitive gross motor function is a age and education adjusted z score of Timed Gait (TIG). The outcome is the 24 week change of cognitive gross motor function domain z-scores (week 24-baseline).

    Measured: At baseline and week 24

  4. Change in Fine Motor Function Domain Z-Score

    The fine motor function domain score is an average of age, sex, education, and African-American ethnicity adjusted z scores of Grooved Pegboard Dominant Hand (GPD) and Grooved Pegboard Non-dominant hand (GPN). The outcome is a 24 week change of the fine motor function domain z-score (week 24-baseline).

    Measured: At baseline and week 24

  5. Change in Psychomotor Function Domain Z-Score

    The psychomotor function domain score us the average of age, sex, education, and African-American ethnicity adjusted z scores of Trail Making Part A (TMA) and Trail Making Part B (TMB). The outcome is the 24 week change of psychomotor function domain z-scores (week24-baseline).

    Measured: At baseline and week 24

  6. Change in Fine Motor/Nonverbal Function Domain Z-Score

    The fine motor/nonverbal function domain score is a age and education adjusted z score of Symbol Digit Test (SYD) The outcome is the 24 change of fine motor/nonverbal function domain z-score (week 24-baseline).

    Measured: At baseline and week 24

  7. Change in Information Processing Function Domain Z-Score

    The information processing function domain score is the average of age and education adjusted z scores of simple and sequential reaction time - CalCAP. The outcome is the 24 week change of information processing function domain z-scores (week 24-baseline).

    Measured: At baseline and week 24

  8. Change in Verbal Memory Domain Z-Score

    The verbal memory domain score is the average of age and education adjusted z scores of Hopkins Verbal Learning Test- Revised, Learning and Delayed Recall. The outcome is the 24 week change of verbal memory domain z-scores (week 24-baseline).

    Measured: At baseline and week 24

  9. Change in Frontal Systems Function Domain Z-Score

    The frontal systems function domain score is the average of age and education adjusted z scores of Stroop Color Interference Test (CTP) and interference task (STP). The outcome is the 24 week change of frontal systems function domain z-score (week 24-baseline).

    Measured: At baseline and week 24

  10. Change in Karnofsky Performance Score

    The original Karnofsky performance score is 11 level score which ranges between 0 to 100. The score 100 means normal and 0 means death; therefore, higher score means higher ability to perform daily tasks.

    For the analysis, a new dichotomous variable (no change/worse vs. better at 24 weeks compared to baseline) was created.

    Measured: At baseline and week 24

  11. Changes in Cluster of Differentiation 4 (CD4) Cell Counts (24 Weeks)

    The outcome was the 24 week change in CD4 cell count (week 24-baseline).

    Measured: At baseline and weeks 24

  12. Changes in Cluster of Differentiation 8 (CD8) Cell Counts (24 Weeks)

    The outcome was the 24 week change of CD8 cell counts (week 24-baseline).

    Measured: At baseline and week 24

  13. Number of Participants With Grade 2 or Higher Toxicity and/or Signs and Symptoms

    Grade or higher means that adverse events were moderate, severe, or life-threatening, or death. Grade 2 or higher adverse events are lised in the Adverse Event section.

    Measured: Throughout study up to week 48

  14. Change of HIV Plasma RiboNucleic Acid (RNA) Viral Load

    The original scale of HIV RNA viral load is between 30 copies/mL to infinitive. The minimum score of 30 is the lowest detectable value. The summary table categorized this continuous value to a dichotomous variable (<30 copies/mL and >= 30 copies/mL).

    Measured: At baseline and week 24

  15. Changes in Instrumental Activities of Daily Living Questionnaire

    The Instrumental Activities of Daily Living (IADL) questionnaire is designed to learn more about how subjects are able to perform common tasks. There are 16 common tasks. For each task, if the score at the time of evaluation is worse than the best in the past, an indicator of 1 is given. Otherwise, the indicator is 0. The overall IADL score is a sum of 16 indicators divided by 16; therefore, the range is between 0 and 1 and the lower score is better. The 24-week change of IADL score was changed into a categorical variable (no change/worse vs. better) at week 24 compare to baseline.

    Measured: At baseline and week 24

  16. Changes in Medication Management Test (Modified)

    The medication management test (modified) is designed to assess participants' medication management ability and their own medications and management. It's the number of how many times participants correctly answered 16 questions. The score ranges between 0 and 16, and higher score indicates better medication management.

    Measured: At baseline and weeks 24

  17. Changes in Protein Markers of Oxidative Stress (Unit = Counts Per Second Only)

    Protein marker of oxidative stress (Ceramides, Monohexosylceramides, Dihydro Glycosyl Galceramides, and Dihexosylceramides). For all markers, the outcome is the 24 week change (week 24-baseline).

    Measured: At pre-entry and Week 24

  18. Changes in Markers of Oxidative Stress and Immune Activation (Unit=pg/mL Only)

    Protein markers of oxidative stress (Protein carbonyls) and markers of immune activation (TNF-a, IL-6,CXCL8, Hepatocyte growth factor, Osteopontin, sFAS, sFAS ligand, and CXCL12). For all markers, the outcome is the 24 week change (week 24-baseline).

    Measured: At pre-entry and Week 24

  19. Changes in Markers of Oxidative Stress (Unit = Pixels/mm2 Only)

    Protein marker of oxidative stress (Neurofilament heavy polypeptide). The outcome is the 24 week change (week 24-baseline).

    Measured: At pre-entry and Week 24

  20. Changes in Neurotransmitter Levels (Unit = uM Only)

    Neurotransmitter levels (Glutamate, Tryptophan, Anthranilic Acid, Quinolinic Acid, Kynurenin, and 3-Hydroxykynurenine). The outcome is the 24 week change (week 24-baseline).

    Measured: At pre-entry and Week 24

  21. Changes in Alternate Psychomotor Function Z-Score

    The alternate psychomotor function is defined as the mean of age, sex, education, and African-American ethnicity adjusted z scores of Trail Making Part A (TMA), and age and education adjusted z score of Symbol Digit (SYD). The outcome is the 24 week change in alternate psychomotor function z-score (week 24-baseline).

    Measured: At baseline and week 24

  22. Changes in Alternate Verbal Memory Z-Score

    The alternate verbal memory was defined as a mean of age and education adjusted z score of trials 1 to 3 and delayed recall tests. The outcome is the 24 week change in alternate verbal memory z-score (week 24-baseline).

    Measured: At baseline and week 24

  23. Changes in Alternate Frontal Systems Z-Score

    The alternate frontal systems was defined as a mean of age and education adjusted z score of Interference task, and age, sex, education, and African-American ethnicity adjusted z score of Trail Making Part B. The outcome was the 24 week change in alternate frontal systems z-score (week 24-baseline).

    Measured: At baseline and week 24

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted8 Aug 2006 (estimated)
  2. Study startMar 2007
  3. Primary completionJan 2010
  4. Study completionJan 2010

Why it stopped: This study was terminated early due to futility.

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 2
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Double blind
Who is masked
Participant, Care provider
Enrolment
107 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT00361257
Sponsor's protocol ID
ACTG A5235
Other IDs
1U01AI068636
Status last verified
Jan 2016
First submitted
4 Aug 2006
Last updated
5 Feb 2016
Data monitoring committee
Yes

Publications

  • Bell JE. An update on the neuropathology of HIV in the HAART era. Histopathology. 2004 Dec;45(6):549-59. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2559.2004.02004.x.

    PubMed 15569045
  • Ferrari S, Vento S, Monaco S, Cavallaro T, Cainelli F, Rizzuto N, Temesgen Z. Human immunodeficiency virus-associated peripheral neuropathies. Mayo Clin Proc. 2006 Feb;81(2):213-9. doi: 10.4065/81.2.213.

    PubMed 16471077
  • Zink MC, Uhrlaub J, DeWitt J, Voelker T, Bullock B, Mankowski J, Tarwater P, Clements J, Barber S. Neuroprotective and anti-human immunodeficiency virus activity of minocycline. JAMA. 2005 Apr 27;293(16):2003-11. doi: 10.1001/jama.293.16.2003.

    PubMed 15855434
  • Sacktor N, Miyahara S, Deng L, Evans S, Schifitto G, Cohen BA, Paul R, Robertson K, Jarocki B, Scarsi K, Coombs RW, Zink MC, Nath A, Smith E, Ellis RJ, Singer E, Weihe J, McCarthy S, Hosey L, Clifford DB; ACTG A5235 team. Minocycline treatment for HIV-associated cognitive impairment: results from a randomized trial. Neurology. 2011 Sep 20;77(12):1135-42. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0b013e31822f0412. Epub 2011 Sep 7.

    PubMed 21900636
  • Sacktor N, Miyahara S, Evans S, Schifitto G, Cohen B, Haughey N, Drewes JL, Graham D, Zink MC, Anderson C, Nath A, Pardo CA, McCarthy S, Hosey L, Clifford D; ACTG A5235 team. Impact of minocycline on cerebrospinal fluid markers of oxidative stress, neuronal injury, and inflammation in HIV-seropositive individuals with cognitive impairment. J Neurovirol. 2014 Dec;20(6):620-6. doi: 10.1007/s13365-014-0292-0. Epub 2014 Nov 7.

    PubMed 25377444

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 2 study testing Minocycline in people with HIV Infections, run by Advancing Clinical Therapeutics Globally for HIV/AIDS and Other Infections at 16 sites in United States.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 11 inclusion and 18 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: stopped early, as of the sponsor's last update on 5 Feb 2016. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 16 sites in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this phase mean?

Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 26 Jul 2011). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Change in Cognitive Performance Compared to Baseline (time frame: At baseline and week 24). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT00361257, which also lists 5 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 5 Feb 2016.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in