AzTrials
AzTrials

Cerebrovascular AccidentNCT00361660

The Effect of Different Schedules of Functional Task Practice for Improving Hand and Arm Function After Stroke

A study testing functional task practice - distributed and functional task practice - condensed in people with Cerebrovascular Accident and Hemiplegia, run by US Department of Veterans Affairs.

Withdrawn

Withdrawn. The study stopped before anyone enrolled.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The first purpose of this study is to determine how often people should practice motor skills to best improve the ability to use the affected arm and hand after stroke. The second purpose is to determine whether it is better to practice a lot of repetitions of a few tasks or a few repetitions of many tasks during… Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 90 years
Conditions the study is for
Cerebrovascular Accident, Hemiplegia
What is being tested?
functional task practice - distributed and functional task practice - condensed
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
0 participants
Where
No sites listed yet
Study dates
Aug 2006to Dec 2007
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 90 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • hemiparesis due to unilateral stroke at least 3 months prior
  • 18-90 years of age
  • able to extend the paretic wrist 200 and at least 1 finger 100
  • able to follow 2-step commands
  • score < 3 on the Motor Activity Log Amount of Use scale

Who cannot join

  • have no medical or orthopedic condition that would significantly limit ability to participate in the intervention or benefit from the therapy
  • have no history of other major neurologic or psychiatric condition or injury, and have no active drug or alcohol abuse.

About this study

Official title: The Impact of Functional Task Practice Dosing on Motor Control in Hemiplegia From Chronic Stroke

The first purpose of this study is to determine how often people should practice motor skills to best improve the ability to use the affected arm and hand after stroke. The second purpose is to determine whether it is better to practice a lot of repetitions of a few tasks or a few repetitions of many tasks during motor rehabilitation for the arm and hand after stroke.

Read the detailed description

Intense skill practice with the affected arm after stroke has the potential to improve upper extremity (UE) function resulting from neuroplastic changes in the motor cortex. However, the necessary and sufficient parameters of this therapy in humans have not been fully investigated. Delineation of the most efficacious and efficient therapy for promoting UE recovery post-stroke is necessary before effective clinical implementation of this therapy. In this study, using parallel group design methodology, we will test the effect of 2 practice parameter (i.e. spacing of practice and number of repetitions per task practiced per session) modifications on UE function following skill practice.

Forty subjects will complete multiple baseline testing and then be randomized, using random number table, to one of 4 groups: condensed functional task practice modeled after Constraint-Induced Movement Therapy (6 hours of practice/day, 5 days/week, 2 weeks), condensed functional task practice with a restricted number of tasks practiced, distributed, distributed functional task practice (Monday, Wednesday, Friday, 6 hours/session, 10 sessions), distributed functional task practice with a restricted number of tasks practiced. During therapy sessions, subjects will practice performing common activities with their paretic upper extremity. They will wear a mitt on their non-paretic upper extremity for up to 90% of their waking hours. Post-testing sessions will follow within one week of completing therapy with an additional follow-up testing session 3 months later.

Being tested
functional task practice - distributed, functional task practice - condensed
Keywords
Motor skills, Occupational Therapy, Physical Therapy Techniques, Rehabilitation, Upper Extremity, Stroke
Medical subject headings
Stroke, Hemiplegia

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • functional task practice - distributedBehavioural

    Also called constraint-Induced Movement Therapy

    This functional task practice is modeled after Constraint-Induced Movement Therapy in which participants wear a mitt on the non-paretic arm for up to 90% of waking hours and then attend therapy for 3 hours a session Monday, Wednesday, and Friday in which they practice various functional tasks, such as tracing a stencil, placing toothbrushes in toothbrush holders, etc.

  • functional task practice - condensedBehavioural

    Also called Constraint-Induced Movement Therapy

    This functional task practice is modeled after Constraint-Induced Movement Therapy in which participants wear a mitt on the non-paretic arm for up to 90% of waking hours and then attend therapy for 3 hours a session Monday through Friday in which they practice various functional tasks, such as tracing a stencil, placing toothbrushes in toothbrush holders, etc.

Study groups in NCT00361660
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
1ExperimentalTherapy is provided every other day 3 days per week (Monday, Wednesday, Friday).
Receives: Behavioral: functional task practice - distributed
2Active comparatorThe same therapy is provided daily Monday through Friday
Receives: Behavioral: functional task practice - condensed

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Upper extremity subscale of the Fugl-Meyer Motor Assessment

    Measured: immediately after therapy ends

Secondary outcomes (1)
  1. Wolf Motor Function Test

    Measured: Immediately after therapy ends

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted8 Aug 2006 (estimated)
  2. Study startAug 2006
  3. Primary completionAug 2007
  4. Study completionDec 2007 (estimated)

Why it stopped: project was only internally funded and would complete for subjects with 2 newer externally funded projects

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Single blind
Enrolment
0 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT00361660
Sponsor's protocol ID
407-2005A
Status last verified
Jun 2015
First submitted
7 Aug 2006
Last updated
26 Jun 2015
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing functional task practice - distributed and functional task practice - condensed in people with Cerebrovascular Accident and Hemiplegia, run by US Department of Veterans Affairs.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 2 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: withdrawn, as of the sponsor's last update on 26 Jun 2015. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study was withdrawn before enrolling participants, so there are no results.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Upper extremity subscale of the Fugl-Meyer Motor Assessment (time frame: immediately after therapy ends). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 26 Jun 2015.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in