AzTrials
AzTrials

DyslipidemiaPhase 3NCT00361868

Fenofibrate and Metformin Fixed Combination vs Rosiglitazone - FAME ROSI

A Phase 3 study testing fenofibrate (F) + metformin (M) hydrochloride fixed combination and Rosiglitazone in people with Dyslipidemia and Glucose Metabolism Disorder, run by Solvay Pharmaceuticals at 70 sites in 8 countries.

Terminated

Stopped early. The study ended before it was planned to and will not resume.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Under conditions of first-line drug treatment in antidiabetic drug naïve/drug free patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus and dyslipidemia, to show that :- the efficacy of a fixed combination (FC) of fenofibrate and metformin on glycemic control is not inferior to that of rosiglitazone and the efficacy of FC of… Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 75 years
Conditions the study is for
Dyslipidemia, Glucose Metabolism Disorder
What is being tested?
fenofibrate (F) + metformin (M) hydrochloride fixed combination and Rosiglitazone
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
88 participants
Where
70 sitesin 8 countries
Study dates
Jun 2006to Dec 2007
Phase
Phase 3
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 75 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Patient with Type 2 diabetes mellitus and dyslipidemia inadequately controlled with lifestyle modifications.

Who cannot join

  • Type 1 diabetes.

Trial locations and contacts

70 sites in 8 countries.

70 sites in 8 countries

Germany14 sites
  • Site 405

    Berlin

  • Site 410

    Borna

  • Site 403

    Bretten

  • Site 402

    Dresden

  • Site 404

    Frankfurt

  • Site 400

    Freiburg im Breisgau

  • Site 401

    Hanover

  • Site 409

    Ilvesheim

  • Site 411

    Ilvesheim

  • Site 407

    Leipzig

  • Site 406

    Rodgau

  • Site 413

    Rotenburg (Wümme)

  • Site 408

    Schwerin

  • Site 412

    Villingen-Schwenningen

Other trials in Germany

Poland12 sites
  • Site 610

    Bialystok

  • Site 606

    Elblag

  • Site 608

    Gdansk

  • Site 600

    Lodz

  • Site 605

    Otolinska

  • Site 604

    Radom

  • Site 613

    Starogard Gdański

  • Site 601

    Warsaw

  • Site 607

    Warsaw

  • Site 612

    Warsaw

  • Site 602

    Wroclaw

  • Site 603

    Wroclaw

Other trials in Poland

Ukraine12 sites
  • Site 807

    Kharkiv

  • Site 811

    Kharkiv

  • Site 812

    Kharkiv

  • Site 800

    Kiev

  • Site 803

    Kiev

  • Site 808

    Kiev

  • Site 809

    Kiev

  • Site 810

    Kiev

  • Site 813

    Kiev

  • Site 805

    Lviv

  • Site 804

    Odesa

  • Site 802

    Vinnitsa

Other trials in Ukraine

Netherlands9 sites
  • Site 509

    Almere Stad

  • Site 502

    Breda

  • Site 503

    Eindhoven

  • Site 504

    Groningen

  • Site 505

    Leiden

  • Site 506

    Nijmegen

  • Site 500

    Rotterdam

  • Site 507

    Velp

  • Site 508

    Zoetermeer

Other trials in Netherlands

France7 sites
  • Site 303

    Bassens

  • Site 307

    Bordeaux

  • Site 305

    Mûrs-Erigné

  • Site 302

    Seysses

  • Site 304

    Strasbourg

  • Site 301

    Thouars

  • Site 306

    Vihiers

Other trials in France

Croatia6 sites
  • Site105

    Pula

  • Site102

    Rijeka

  • Site103

    Split

  • Site104

    Varaždin

  • Site100

    Zagreb

  • Site101

    Zagreb

Other trials in Croatia

Romania6 sites
  • Site 704

    Brasov

  • Site 701

    Bucharest

  • Site 703

    Bucharest

  • Site 700

    Cluj-Napoca

  • Site 702

    Iași

  • Site 705

    Târgu Mureş

Other trials in Romania

Finland4 sites
  • Site 205

    Jyväskylä

  • Site 206

    Kokkola

  • Site 208

    Laukaa

  • Site 207

    Oulu

Other trials in Finland

About this study

Official title: A Randomized, Double-Blind Trial Comparing the Efficacy and Safety of a Fixed Combination of Fenofibrate and Metformin vs Rosiglitazone in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus and Dyslipidemia

Under conditions of first-line drug treatment in antidiabetic drug naïve/drug free patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus and dyslipidemia, to show that :- the efficacy of a fixed combination (FC) of fenofibrate and metformin on glycemic control is not inferior to that of rosiglitazone and the efficacy of FC of fenofibrate and metformin on triglyceride control is superior to that of rosiglitazone.

Being tested
fenofibrate (F) + metformin (M) hydrochloride fixed combination, Rosiglitazone
Keywords
Treatment of Dyslipidemia and of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus
Medical subject headings
Dyslipidemias, Glucose Metabolism Disorders

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • fenofibrate (F) + metformin (M) hydrochloride fixed combinationDrug

    First period: F80mg/M500mg - per os - twice a day during 2 weeks and F80mg/M850mg - per os - twice a day during 10 weeks - Second period: F54mg/M850mg - per os - three times a day during 12 weeks

  • RosiglitazoneDrug

    First period: 4 mg - per os - daily during 12 weeks - Second period: 4 mg - per os - twice a day during 12 weeks

Study groups in NCT00361868
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
1ExperimentalNot described
Receives: Drug: fenofibrate (F) + metformin (M) hydrochloride fixed combination
2Active comparatorNot described
Receives: Drug: Rosiglitazone

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. HbA1c/TG

    Measured: 24 weeks

Secondary outcomes (1)
  1. Lipid and glycemic parameters.

    Measured: 24 weeks

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted9 Aug 2006 (estimated)
  2. Study startJun 2006
  3. Primary completionDec 2007
  4. Study completionDec 2007

Why it stopped: The study was discontinued prematurely at the end of March 2007 due to slow enrolment.

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 3
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Double blind
Who is masked
Participant, Investigator
Enrolment
88 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT00361868
Sponsor's protocol ID
C LF23-0121 05 01
Other IDs
2005-006060-63, 2005
Status last verified
Jun 2008
First submitted
8 Aug 2006
Last updated
27 Jun 2008
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
Yes

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 3 study testing fenofibrate (F) + metformin (M) hydrochloride fixed combination and Rosiglitazone in people with Dyslipidemia and Glucose Metabolism Disorder, run by Solvay Pharmaceuticals at 70 sites in 8 countries.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: stopped early, as of the sponsor's last update on 27 Jun 2008. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 70 sites in Germany, Poland, Ukraine, Netherlands, France and 3 more countries. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this phase mean?

Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

The study was stopped early (reason given: The study was discontinued prematurely at the end of March 2007 due to slow enrolment.). Results are not available in the source record.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

HbA1c/TG (time frame: 24 weeks). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 27 Jun 2008.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in