Gastroesophageal RefluxPhase 2/3NCT00361972
Elucidation of Acid-Induced Pulmonary Inflammation
A Phase 2/3 study testing lansoprazole in people with Gastroesophageal Reflux and Asthma, run by University of Utah at 1 site in United States.
Trial summary
This study will evaluate how heartburn may lead to different types of inflammation in one's airways. Additionally, the study will determine whether aggressive treatment of heartburn results in improvement in both symptoms of heartburn and asthma but also in documented improvement in airway inflammation as determined… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 65 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Gastroesophageal Reflux, Asthma
- What is being tested?
- lansoprazole
- Type of treatment
- Pill or oral medicine
- Could I receive a placebo?
- Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
- How many people
- 17 participants
- Where
- 1 siteUnited States
- Study dates
- Aug 2006to Apr 2009
- Phase
- Phase 2/3
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 65 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- chronic cough consistent with bronchoreactivity
- Gastroesophageal reflux
Who cannot join
- Severe asthmatics who have been hospitalized within the last 6 months or who have required oral steroid use within the last 4 weeks
- Severe coronary artery disease
- Cigarette/cigar smoking within the last 6 months
- Documented allergies affecting the respiratory system
- Subjects with contraindications to pH/impedance probe
- Hemophilia
Show all 14Show fewer
- Septal deviation
- Subjects with contraindications to bronchoscopy as outlined by the American Thoracic Society Guidelines
- Anticoagulation
- Pregnancy
- Incarcerated patients
- Current oral steroid use (may suppress levels of inflammation)
- Upper respiratory infection within the last 2 weeks
- Ongoing acid suppression with a proton pump inhibitor, however, patients may be included if they have discontinued their proton pump inhibitor within the last 1 month with stable asthma symptoms as defined by stable utilization of inhaled steroids
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
United States1 site
University of Utah Health Sciences Center
Salt Lake City, Utah, 84132
About this study
This study will evaluate how heartburn may lead to different types of inflammation in one's airways. Additionally, the study will determine whether aggressive treatment of heartburn results in improvement in both symptoms of heartburn and asthma but also in documented improvement in airway inflammation as determined by biopsy. The results of this study will be important in directing future research into the relationship between heartburn and asthma and may provide a clue whether certain subtypes of asthma may be caused primarily by gastroesophageal reflux (GER).
Read the detailed description
Currently, many Americans suffer from asthma. The exact mechanism by which airway inflammation leads to asthma symptoms has yet to be clearly explained. In previous studies, persons with asthma appear to have different types of inflammation in their lungs. The reasons for this difference remain a mystery. Allergy is known to play a role in bronchospasm. Other mechanisms have not been discovered.
It is known that asthma and heartburn are correlated. Studies have confirmed a direct relationship between cough and heartburn (Gastroesophageal reflux). Other researchers have determined that asthma is often worsened by GER. Determination of the exact relationship between these two entities remains unclear.
Heartburn may contribute to airway inflammation in asthmatics, resulting in different patterns of inflammation between those people with and without GER. In fact, adult-onset asthma may result primarily from longstanding heartburn. This has yet to be proven.
This study will evaluate how heartburn may lead to different types of inflammation in one's airways. Additionally, the goal of this study is to determine whether aggressive treatment of heartburn results in improvement in both symptoms of heartburn and asthma but also in documented improvement in airway inflammation as determined by biopsy. The results of this study will be important in directing future research into the relationship between heartburn and asthma and may provide a clue whether certain subtypes of asthma may be caused primarily by GER.
A total of 30 subjects will be studied, randomized to twice daily lansoprazole or placebo. Study procedures are as follows:
- Esophageal studies and validated questionnaires:
Patients will be evaluated with validated SF-36 Quality of Life Questionnaire, Mini-asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire, and GER Questionnaire. Patients will undergo esophageal manometry and pH detection with a 24- hour pH probe to confirm the presence of pathologic GER.
- Bronchoscopy:
After an overnight fast, subjects will report to the bronchoscopy suite as directed. Bronchoscopy with bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) and bronchial biopsy will be performed following the University of Utah's standardized protocol. Bronchoscopy and endobronchial biopsies present minimal risk to asthmatic airways when performed by appropriate, trained personnel. Conscious sedation with intravenous remifentanyl and propofol will be administered by a trained nurse experienced in conscious sedation. The nose and pharynx will be anesthetized with 1% lidocaine administered by nebulization and by lidocaine jelly administered topically to the nasal mucosa. Additional lidocaine will be administered via the bronchoscope to the vocal cords, trachea, main carina and mainstem bronchi. The total dose of lidocaine will not exceed 400 mg. All subjects will have continuous cardiac and oxygen saturation monitoring and will receive supplemental oxygen during the procedure sufficient to maintain SpO2 > 90%.
The subject will be placed in a recumbent position and the bronchoscope will be introduced via the nose. After passing the vocal cords, the bronchoscope will be introduced via the right mainstem bronchus into the right middle lobe where it will be wedged into a segmental bronchus. (Should, for any reason, the right middle lobe be inaccessible, the same procedure will be used to wedge the bronchoscope into a lingular segment in the left lung.) A 60 cc aliquot of room temperature normal saline will be instilled through the bronchoscope and recovered using the same syringe. This procedure will be repeated three more times (total lavage volume of 240 cc) and the recovered volumes will be pooled and measured. Forceps biopsies of respiratory mucosa will then be taken from the trachea, main carina, bronchus intermedius and right middle lobe areas. Two to six biopsies will be taken from each site. Specific tissue from each site will be frozen and stored for future use.
Individuals will be randomized to lansoprazole 30 mg twice daily or placebo (all patients will undergo lifestyle modification for reflux) for 6 weeks. It has been determined in previous studies that higher levels of acid suppression are needed to result in clinical improvement in asthma.
Patients will be monitored by telephone at regular intervals. Rescue inhaler use, hospitalizations, exercise tolerance, and study compliance will be assessed and recorded to document clinical progress. Patients will be asked to maintain their standard inhaler therapy (especially that of inhaled steroids). Any changes to the therapy will be immediately reported to the investigators. If subjects experience an acute flare, appropriate medications will be given until the patient is stable to return to their initial inhaler regimen. If patients remain on stable medication throughout the trial, repeat bronchoscopy will be performed at 6 weeks.
After 6 weeks, patients will once again undergo bronchoscopy with BAL/biopsies. Cytokine protein arrays will be repeated. Comparisons will then be made intra-group before and after therapy. Additional comparisons of inflammation and bronchial hyper-responsiveness will be made between groups. Randomization will allow the investigators to control for any changes in cytokine patterns due to seasonal affect (if both groups reduce the concentration of Interleukin-5 in a similar pattern, this is more likely seasonal than due to acid suppression).
Primary outcome will include change in cellular infiltration in the bronch specimens of lymphocytes. Secondary outcome will include RNA expression changes of tumor necrosis factor (TNF) alpha from BAL samples.
- Conditions
- Gastroesophageal Reflux, Asthma
- Being tested
- lansoprazole, placebo
- Medical subject headings
- Gastroesophageal Reflux, Asthma
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
lansoprazoleDrug
Also called Prevacid
30 mg of lansoprazole twice daily for 6 weeks
placeboDrug
placebo comparator to lansoprazole 30 mg, twice daily for 6 weeks
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Lansoprazole therapy | Active comparator | Lansoprazole 30 mg orally twice daily Receives: Drug: lansoprazole |
| Placebo | Placebo comparator | placebo orally twice daily Receives: Drug: placebo |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Change in Lymphocyte Count
Change in mean lymphocyte count in bronchus intermedius biopsies between lansoprazole and placebo groups, measured in lymphocytes per square millimeter. Overall mean differences were compared (post-intervention mean lymphocyte count minus pre-intervention mean lymphocyte count) between the two intervention groups.
Measured: Baseline and 6 weeks
Secondary outcomes (1)
Log Change in Tumor Necrosis Factor (TNF) Alpha Measurement
Change in TNF alpha cytokine expression from bronchoalveolar lavage aspirate samples between lansoprazole and placebo groups, measured in log picograms per milliliter (log (pg/mL)) units, pre- and post-intervention.
Measured: Baseline and 6 weeks
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted9 Aug 2006 (estimated)
- Study startAug 2006
- Primary completionApr 2009
- Study completionApr 2009
Why it stopped: limited recruitment
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Other trials for Gastroesophageal RefluxStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by University of UtahThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 2/3
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Investigator
- Enrolment
- 17 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- University of Utah
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Kathryn A. Peterson, University of Utah
- Investigators
- Kathryn Peterson, MD, Principal investigator, University of Utah
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00361972
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 15444
- Other IDs
- IRB #15444
- Status last verified
- Jun 2016
- First submitted
- 8 Aug 2006
- Last updated
- 5 Aug 2016
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 5 Aug 2016. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Elucidation of Acid-Induced Pulmonary Inflammation
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00361972
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 15444
- Conditions
- Gastroesophageal Reflux, Asthma
- Phase
- Phase 2/3
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- TerminatedReason stopped: limited recruitment
- Enrolment
- 17 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- University of UtahUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- Aug 2006
- Primary completion
- Apr 2009 (actual)
- Study completion
- Apr 2009 (actual)
- First posted
- 9 Aug 2006 (estimated)
- Results
- Posted 5 Aug 2016
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
This study will evaluate how heartburn may lead to different types of inflammation in one's airways. Additionally, the study will determine whether aggressive treatment of heartburn results in improvement in both symptoms of heartburn and asthma but also in documented improvement in airway inflammation as determined by biopsy. The results of this study will be important in directing future research into the relationship between heartburn and asthma and may provide a clue whether certain subtypes of asthma may be caused primarily by gastroesophageal reflux (GER).
Detailed description
Currently, many Americans suffer from asthma. The exact mechanism by which airway inflammation leads to asthma symptoms has yet to be clearly explained. In previous studies, persons with asthma appear to have different types of inflammation in their lungs. The reasons for this difference remain a mystery. Allergy is known to play a role in bronchospasm. Other mechanisms have not been discovered.
It is known that asthma and heartburn are correlated. Studies have confirmed a direct relationship between cough and heartburn (Gastroesophageal reflux). Other researchers have determined that asthma is often worsened by GER. Determination of the exact relationship between these two entities remains unclear.
Heartburn may contribute to airway inflammation in asthmatics, resulting in different patterns of inflammation between those people with and without GER. In fact, adult-onset asthma may result primarily from longstanding heartburn. This has yet to be proven.
This study will evaluate how heartburn may lead to different types of inflammation in one's airways. Additionally, the goal of this study is to determine whether aggressive treatment of heartburn results in improvement in both symptoms of heartburn and asthma but also in documented improvement in airway inflammation as determined by biopsy. The results of this study will be important in directing future research into the relationship between heartburn and asthma and may provide a clue whether certain subtypes of asthma may be caused primarily by GER.
A total of 30 subjects will be studied, randomized to twice daily lansoprazole or placebo. Study procedures are as follows:
- Esophageal studies and validated questionnaires:
Patients will be evaluated with validated SF-36 Quality of Life Questionnaire, Mini-asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire, and GER Questionnaire. Patients will undergo esophageal manometry and pH detection with a 24- hour pH probe to confirm the presence of pathologic GER.
- Bronchoscopy:
After an overnight fast, subjects will report to the bronchoscopy suite as directed. Bronchoscopy with bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) and bronchial biopsy will be performed following the University of Utah's standardized protocol. Bronchoscopy and endobronchial biopsies present minimal risk to asthmatic airways when performed by appropriate, trained personnel. Conscious sedation with intravenous remifentanyl and propofol will be administered by a trained nurse experienced in conscious sedation. The nose and pharynx will be anesthetized with 1% lidocaine administered by nebulization and by lidocaine jelly administered topically to the nasal mucosa. Additional lidocaine will be administered via the bronchoscope to the vocal cords, trachea, main carina and mainstem bronchi. The total dose of lidocaine will not exceed 400 mg. All subjects will have continuous cardiac and oxygen saturation monitoring and will receive supplemental oxygen during the procedure sufficient to maintain SpO2 > 90%.
The subject will be placed in a recumbent position and the bronchoscope will be introduced via the nose. After passing the vocal cords, the bronchoscope will be introduced via the right mainstem bronchus into the right middle lobe where it will be wedged into a segmental bronchus. (Should, for any reason, the right middle lobe be inaccessible, the same procedure will be used to wedge the bronchoscope into a lingular segment in the left lung.) A 60 cc aliquot of room temperature normal saline will be instilled through the bronchoscope and recovered using the same syringe. This procedure will be repeated three more times (total lavage volume of 240 cc) and the recovered volumes will be pooled and measured. Forceps biopsies of respiratory mucosa will then be taken from the trachea, main carina, bronchus intermedius and right middle lobe areas. Two to six biopsies will be taken from each site. Specific tissue from each site will be frozen and stored for future use.
Individuals will be randomized to lansoprazole 30 mg twice daily or placebo (all patients will undergo lifestyle modification for reflux) for 6 weeks. It has been determined in previous studies that higher levels of acid suppression are needed to result in clinical improvement in asthma.
Patients will be monitored by telephone at regular intervals. Rescue inhaler use, hospitalizations, exercise tolerance, and study compliance will be assessed and recorded to document clinical progress. Patients will be asked to maintain their standard inhaler therapy (especially that of inhaled steroids). Any changes to the therapy will be immediately reported to the investigators. If subjects experience an acute flare, appropriate medications will be given until the patient is stable to return to their initial inhaler regimen. If patients remain on stable medication throughout the trial, repeat bronchoscopy will be performed at 6 weeks.
After 6 weeks, patients will once again undergo bronchoscopy with BAL/biopsies. Cytokine protein arrays will be repeated. Comparisons will then be made intra-group before and after therapy. Additional comparisons of inflammation and bronchial hyper-responsiveness will be made between groups. Randomization will allow the investigators to control for any changes in cytokine patterns due to seasonal affect (if both groups reduce the concentration of Interleukin-5 in a similar pattern, this is more likely seasonal than due to acid suppression).
Primary outcome will include change in cellular infiltration in the bronch specimens of lymphocytes. Secondary outcome will include RNA expression changes of tumor necrosis factor (TNF) alpha from BAL samples.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind (participant, investigator)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Lansoprazole therapy | Active comparator | Drug: lansoprazoleLansoprazole 30 mg orally twice daily |
| Placebo | Placebo comparator | Drug: placeboplacebo orally twice daily |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 65 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (2 listed)
- chronic cough consistent with bronchoreactivity
- Gastroesophageal reflux
Key exclusion criteria (14 listed)
- Severe asthmatics who have been hospitalized within the last 6 months or who have required oral steroid use within the last 4 weeks
- Severe coronary artery disease
- Cigarette/cigar smoking within the last 6 months
- Documented allergies affecting the respiratory system
- Subjects with contraindications to pH/impedance probe
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| lansoprazoleAlso: Prevacid30 mg of lansoprazole twice daily for 6 weeks | Drug | Lansoprazole therapy |
| placeboplacebo comparator to lansoprazole 30 mg, twice daily for 6 weeks | Drug | Placebo |
Primary outcome
Change in Lymphocyte Count
Time frame: Baseline and 6 weeks
Change in mean lymphocyte count in bronchus intermedius biopsies between lansoprazole and placebo groups, measured in lymphocytes per square millimeter. Overall mean differences were compared (post-intervention mean lymphocyte count minus pre-intervention mean lymphocyte count) between the two intervention groups.
1 secondary outcome
Log Change in Tumor Necrosis Factor (TNF) Alpha Measurement
Time frame: Baseline and 6 weeks
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 5 Aug 2016.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Gastroesophageal Reflux
RecruitingObservational study
A Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Long-term Administration of K-CAB Tab./K-CAB ODT(Tegoprazan) 25 mg as Maintenance Therapy Following the Treatment of GERD
Maintenance Therapy Following Treatment for Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease(GERD)
Active, not recruitingObservational study
RETHINK REFLUX Registry
Gastroesophageal Reflux
Recruiting
Transcatheter Mitral Valve Replacement in Patients With Severe Symptomatic Mitral Regurgitation - APOLLO-EU Trial
Mitral Regurgitation
Not yet recruitingPhase 4
Effects of Tirzepatide on Esophagogastric Junction Mechanics, Reflux Burden, and Gastric Physiology in Adults With Obesity
Obese Adults
Recruiting
Mesh Vs Pledgets for Repair of Paraesophageal Hernia
Paraesophageal Hernia, GERD
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Kathryn Peterson, MD principal investigator
University of Utah
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 2/3 study testing lansoprazole in people with Gastroesophageal Reflux and Asthma, run by University of Utah at 1 site in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 14 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: stopped early, as of the sponsor's last update on 5 Aug 2016. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this combined phase mean?
Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.
Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 5 Aug 2016). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Change in Lymphocyte Count (time frame: Baseline and 6 weeks). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 5 Aug 2016.