AzTrials
AzTrials

ProstatePhase 3NCT00364455

Impact of Erythropoietin Treatment Versus Placebo on Quality-of-life in Patients With Advanced Prostate Cancer.

A Phase 3 study testing Epoetin alfa in people with Prostate and Carcinoma, run by Janssen-Ortho Inc., Canada.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of treatment with epoetin alfa (recombinant human erythropoietin) or placebo on anemia related quality-of-life and anemia in hormone-refractory (not responding to hormone therapy) prostate cancer patients. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older, men only
Conditions the study is for
Prostate, Carcinoma
What is being tested?
Epoetin alfa
How many people
56 participants
Where
No sites listed yet
Study dates
Dec 2002to Mar 2006
Phase
Phase 3
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • Men only
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Patients with histological confirmed adenocarcinoma of the prostate or patients who have metastatic carcinoma of presumptive prostate origin as manifest by the presence of sclerotic bony metastases and a serum PSA level greater than the upper limit of normal
  • Hemoglobin level at or below 120 g/L
  • ECOG (Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group) Performance status of 0-2.

Who cannot join

  • No known or suspected CNS metastasis (Cancer that has spread from the original (primary) tumor to the central nervous system)
  • No other active concurrent malignancy, other than the underlying prostate cancer which is expected to influence QoL
  • No blood transfusions within the last 14 days and no previous use of erythropoietin (i.e., that would impact baseline Hb)
  • No anemia due to factors other than cancer/radiotherapy (i.e., hemolysis or gastrointestinal bleeding, evidence of untreated folate or vitamin B12 deficiency)
  • No history of uncontrolled hypertension or diastolic blood pressure greater than 100 mmHg
  • No mental incompetence, including psychiatric or addictive disorders which would preclude meaningful completion of quality-of-life questionnaires.

About this study

Official title: Randomized Trial of Epoetin Alfa in Men With Hormone-refractory Prostate Cancer and Anemia.

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of treatment with epoetin alfa (recombinant human erythropoietin) or placebo on anemia related quality-of-life and anemia in hormone-refractory (not responding to hormone therapy) prostate cancer patients.

Read the detailed description

Anemia is a common problem experienced by patients with malignancy. Although cancer treatment such as systemic chemotherapy is an obvious cause, many cancer patients are anemic at presentation. Estimates in prostate cancer patients suggest that nearly 40% present with hemoglobin levels less than 120 g/L. The most common clinical manifestation of anemia is fatigue, although vertigo, loss of appetite, poor concentration and dyspnea (shortness of breath) can also occur. Anemia often leads to impairment of physical capacity, lowers patients' subjective sense of well-being, and diminishes their overall quality-of-life (QoL). The use of recombinant erythropoietin for patients with chronic anemia of end stage renal disease, acquired immune deficiency syndrome, or anemia of chronic disease in the setting of malignancy (cancer) is well established to provide benefit in reducing transfusion requirements. There exists a number of published data on QoL in cancer patients. Abels et al. published in 1991 initial results of clinical reports that specifically reported on QoL outcomes. The study actually consisted of a series of three concurrent randomized, double blind, placebo controlled trials conducted on groups of patients with a variety of underlying malignancies. The three studies included 124 patients not previously treated with systemic therapy, 132 patients treated systemically with cisplatinum containing chemotherapy regimens and 157 patients treated with non-cisplatinum containing regimens respectively. All patients had pre-treatment hemoglobins of less than 105 g/L or hematocrits (percentage of red blood cells in blood) of less than 32%. In each trial, patients randomized to receive recombinant erythropoietin had significantly greater increases in hematocrit than placebo patients. QoL parameters (as measured on a visual analog scale) were significantly improved in patients receiving erythropoietin who demonstrated an increase in hematocrit throughout the three studies. Overall QoL improved significantly over baseline, although individual studies only demonstrated a trend towards improvement. Littlewood et al. published in 2001 the results of a double-blind, placebo controlled multi-center study of 375 cancer patients receiving non-platinum containing chemotherapy. A baseline hemoglobin of less than or equal to 105 g/L, or a drop of 20 g/L with chemotherapy was required for eligibility. Patients were randomized 1:2 to either placebo or epoetin alfa, for up to 4 weeks following chemotherapy. Active treatment demonstrated significant effectiveness in increasing hemoglobin levels and reducing transfusion requirements. Significant improvement in all primary cancer- and anemia-specific QoL domains favoured epoetin alfa. Although clinical evidence suggests benefit beyond reduced transfusion requirements, many studies looking at impact on QoL have been uncontrolled by design, with variable quality and collection of QoL data. Since they have also involved patients with a myriad of primary malignancies, and previous therapies, the translation of results to site and situation specific clinical practice has been difficult. As erythropoiesis is a complex process that depends on inhibiting or stimulating cytokines, which may be regulated differently among various neoplastic diseases (i.e. different tumour types), studies in more homogenous groups of patients were deemed necessary to evaluate impact on QoL. Prostate cancer is the most common serious cancer in men. Despite advances in screening and treatment, progression to the incurable metastatic phase of the disease remains common. Androgen ablation therapy using surgery or drugs remains the standard of treatment, but inevitably, androgen resistance develops. Hormone refractory prostate cancer represents a spectrum of disease ranging from asymptomatic patients with only biochemical evidence of androgen resistance to end-stage disease characterized by extensive bone metastases, pain, wasting, reduced QoL, and a median survival of less than one year. Treatment of hormone refractory prostate cancer does not prolong survival, but may improve symptoms and QoL. Anemia is common in this group of patients, with hemoglobin levels of less than 120 g/L often seen (in up to 40% patients). Patients are also genrally older, often have co-morbid conditions, and transfusions for palliation are frequently given. A randomized, placebo-controlled study evaluating an intervention with epoetin alfa that could significantly improve QoL was thus carried out in hormone refractory prostate cancer patients. It was deemed that such an intervention, if successful, could have the potential to change current clinical practice. Moreover, improved QoL, in response to increased Hb levels, could also lead to a reduction in hospital admissions and to fewer transfusions in this patient population.

Patients were to receive either 40,000 IU epoetin alfa weekly or matching placebo subcutaneously for 16 weeks.

Conditions
Prostate, Carcinoma
Being tested
Epoetin alfa
Keywords
Hormone refractory prostate cancer, Anemia, Quality-of-life
Medical subject headings
Carcinoma, Anemia

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Epoetin alfaDrug

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. The primary outcome was change in Quality of Life (FACT-An Anemia scale) from baseline to 16 weeks.

Secondary outcomes (1)
  1. QoL was measured at baseline, 4, 8, 12, 16 and 20 weeks (FACT-An Total and Cancer Linear Analogue Scale). Hb and Hematocrit levels were assessed at baseline, 4, 8, 12, 16 and 20 weeks. Transfusion requirements were recorded throughout the trial.

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted15 Aug 2006 (estimated)
  2. Study startDec 2002
  3. Study completionMar 2006

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 3
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Double blind
Enrolment
56 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT00364455
Sponsor's protocol ID
CR006118
Status last verified
Apr 2010
First submitted
11 Aug 2006
Last updated
27 Apr 2010
Results posted
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 3 study testing Epoetin alfa in people with Prostate and Carcinoma, run by Janssen-Ortho Inc., Canada.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 6 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 27 Apr 2010. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this phase mean?

Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

The primary outcome was change in Quality of Life (FACT-An Anemia scale) from baseline to 16 weeks.. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 27 Apr 2010.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in