AzTrials
AzTrials

ConstipationPhase 2/3NCT00365820

Efficacy and Safety of Tegaserod in Opioid-induced Constipation in Patients With Non-cancer Pain

A Phase 2/3 study testing Tegaserod in people with Constipation, run by Novartis at 59 sites in United States.

Terminated

Stopped early. The study ended before it was planned to and will not resume.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

This study will evaluate the efficacy and safety of tegaserod in opioid-induced constipation in patients with non-cancer pain. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Constipation
What is being tested?
Tegaserod
How many people
670 participants
Where
59 sitesUnited States
Study dates
Jul 2006to Apr 2007
Phase
Phase 2/3
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Male and female outpatients 18 years of age or older.
  • Patients with chronic non-cancer pain that necessitates the use of non-injectable opioid analgesics. The equivalent dose of 300 mg morphine per day is the maximum opioid analgesic dose allowed. In general, patients should be using opioids on a daily basis.
  • Chronic pain which has been present for a minimum of 3 months which needs the chronic use of opioids for pain relief.
  • Constipation, according to the investigator's clinical judgment, that is resulting from opioid use for non-cancer chronic pain. Opioid-induced constipation (OIC) is defined as follows:
  • less than 3 spontaneous bowel movements per week and at least one of the following on at least 25% of occasions:
  • hard or very hard stools
  • sensation of incomplete evacuation
  • straining while having a bowel movement

Who cannot join

  • Patients who are receiving opioids for abdominal pain or connective tissue disorders.
  • Planned discontinuation or an increase or decrease by more than 30% of the current opioid dose
  • Patients who underwent major surgery within 3 months prior to screening.
  • Patients with a history of prior chronic constipation (CC) that was present for more than three months and that was not related to opioid use.
  • Patients with a current diagnosis of irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) constipation predominant or alternators.
  • Other protocol-defined inclusion/exclusion criteria may apply.

Trial locations and contacts

59 sites in 1 country.

59 sites in 1 country

United States59 sites
  • Investigative Site

    Avon, Indiana, 46123

  • Investigative Site

    Beaumont, Texas, 77701

  • Investigative Site

    Belleville, Illinois, 62220

  • Investigative Site

    Boston, Massachusetts, 02118

  • Investigative Site

    Boston, Massachusetts, 02215

  • Investigative Site

    Bristol, Connecticut, 06010

  • Investigative Site

    Buena Park, California, 90620

  • Investigative Site

    Charlotte, North Carolina, 28210

  • Investigative Site

    Charlottesville, Virginia, 22903

  • Investigative Site

    Chattanooga, Tennessee, 37404

  • Investigative Site

    Chicago, Illinois, 60640

  • Investigative Site

    Colleyville, Texas, 76034

  • Investigative Site

    Corsicana, Texas, 75110

  • Investigative Site

    Dayton, Ohio, 45440

  • Investigative Site

    DeLand, Florida, 32720

  • Investigative Site

    Downey, California, 90240

  • Novartis Pharmaceutical Corporation

    East Hanover, New Jersey, 07936-1080

  • Investigative Site

    Encinitas, California, 92024

  • Investigative Site

    Evansville, Indiana, 47714

  • Investigative Site

    Fountain Valley, California, 92708

  • Investigative Site

    Greensboro, North Carolina, 27401

  • Investigative Site

    Hershey, Pennsylvania, 17033-085

  • Investigative Site

    Houston, Texas, 77005

  • Investigative Site

    Indianapolis, Indiana, 46254

  • Investigative Site

    Jacksonville, Florida, 32207

  • Investigative Site

    La Jolla, California, 92037

  • Investigative Site

    Largo, Florida, 33773

  • Investigative Site

    Levittown, Pennsylvania, 19056

  • Investigative Site

    Los Angeles, California, 90073

  • Investigative Site

    Miami, Florida, 33176

  • Investigative Site

    Mission Viejo, California, 92691

  • Investigative Site

    Mobile, Alabama, 36608

  • Investigative Site

    Monroe, North Carolina, 28112

  • Investigative Site

    New Smyrna Beach, Florida, 32168

  • Investigative Site

    New York, New York, 10016

  • Investigative Site

    New York, New York, 10022

  • Investigative Site

    North Little Rock, Arkansas, 72117

  • Investigative Site

    North Massapequa, New York, 11758

  • Investigative Site

    Northglenn, Colorado, 80234

  • Investigative Site

    Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, 73112

  • Investigative Site

    Omaha, Nebraska, 68114

  • Investigative Site

    Omaha, Nebraska, 68134

  • Investigative Site

    Overland Park, Kansas, 66212

  • Investigative Site

    Pahrump, Nevada, 89048

  • Investigative Site

    Phoenix, Arizona, 85029

  • Investigative Site

    Phoenix, Arizona, 85050

  • Investigative Site

    Portland, Oregon, 97232

  • Investigative Site

    Prairie Village, Kansas, 66206

  • Investigative Site

    Salt Lake City, Utah, 84132

  • Investigative Site

    San Antonio, Texas, 78229

  • Investigative Site

    San Diego, California, 92103

  • Investigative Site

    San Francisco, California, 94115

  • Investigative Site

    Seattle, Washington, 98104

  • Investigative Site

    Shreveport, Louisiana, 71103

  • Investigative Site

    Springhill, Florida, 34609

  • Investigative Site

    Tampa, Florida, 33607

  • Investigative Site

    Torrance, California, 90505

  • Investigative Site

    Tucson, Arizona, 85712

  • Investigative Site

    Winston-Salem, North Carolina, 27103

Other trials in United States

About this study

Official title: A Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled Multicenter Phase II/III Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Tegaserod and Placebo Given Orally for 12 Weeks for the Treatment of Opioid-induced Constipation (OIC) in Patients With Chronic Non-cancer Pain

This study will evaluate the efficacy and safety of tegaserod in opioid-induced constipation in patients with non-cancer pain.

Conditions
Constipation
Being tested
Tegaserod
Keywords
Opioid, constipation, tegaserod, Opioid-induced constipation
Medical subject headings
Constipation, Opioid-Induced Constipation

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • TegaserodDrug

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Change from baseline in the number of bowel movements over weeks 1-4

Secondary outcomes (3)
  1. Change from baseline in the number of bowel movements over weeks 1-12

  2. Change from baseline in abdominal distension/bloating over weeks 1-12

  3. Change from baseline in abdominal discomfort/pain over weeks 1-12

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted18 Aug 2006 (estimated)
  2. Study startJul 2006
  3. Primary completionApr 2007
  4. Study completionApr 2007

Why it stopped: This study was terminated early as a result of regulatory action suspending tegaserod use in 2007

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 2/3
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Double blind
Enrolment
670 participants
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT00365820
Sponsor's protocol ID
CHTF919N2201
Status last verified
Apr 2012
First submitted
17 Aug 2006
Last updated
20 Apr 2012
Results posted
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 2/3 study testing Tegaserod in people with Constipation, run by Novartis at 59 sites in United States.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 8 inclusion and 6 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: stopped early, as of the sponsor's last update on 20 Apr 2012. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 59 sites in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this combined phase mean?

Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.

Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

The study was stopped early (reason given: This study was terminated early as a result of regulatory action suspending tegaserod use in 2007). Results are not available in the source record.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Change from baseline in the number of bowel movements over weeks 1-4. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 20 Apr 2012.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in