AzTrials
AzTrials

Pertrochanteric and Subtrochanteric Femur FracturesNCT00367406

Comparison Between Gamma 3 Nail and ACE Trochanteric Nail

A study testing Gamma 3 nail versus ACE trochanteric nail in people with Pertrochanteric and Subtrochanteric Femur Fractures, run by University Hospital, Ghent at 1 site in Belgium.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Pertrochanteric and subtrochanteric femur fractures will be treated with a Gamma 3 nail or an ACE Trochanteric nail. Following topics will be assessed: fracture consolidation, mobility, pain, walking power, agility. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
What is being tested?
Gamma 3 nail versus ACE trochanteric nail
Type of treatment
Medical device
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
100 participants
Where
1 siteBelgium
Study dates
Nov 2006to Jul 2015
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Pertrochanteric or subtrochanteric femur fracture

Who cannot join

None listed.

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Belgium1 site
  • University Hospital Ghent

    Ghent, 9000

Other trials in Belgium

About this study

Pertrochanteric and subtrochanteric femur fractures will be treated with a Gamma 3 nail or an ACE Trochanteric nail.

Following topics will be assessed: fracture consolidation, mobility, pain, walking power, agility.

Being tested
Gamma 3 nail versus ACE trochanteric nail

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Gamma 3 nail versus ACE trochanteric nailDevice

    Comparing Gamma 3 nail versus ACE trochanteric nail

Study groups in NCT00367406
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Treatment with a Gamma 3 nail.ExperimentalNot described
Receives: Device: Gamma 3 nail versus ACE trochanteric nail

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Consolidation of the fracture

    Measured: From surgery untill healing

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted22 Aug 2006 (estimated)
  2. Study startNov 2006
  3. Primary completionJul 2015
  4. Study completionJul 2015

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Non-randomised
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
100 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT00367406
Sponsor's protocol ID
2006/280
Status last verified
Dec 2014
First submitted
21 Aug 2006
Last updated
20 Dec 2022
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Gamma 3 nail versus ACE trochanteric nail in people with Pertrochanteric and Subtrochanteric Femur Fractures, run by University Hospital, Ghent at 1 site in Belgium.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 0 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 20 Dec 2022. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Belgium. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Consolidation of the fracture (time frame: From surgery untill healing). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 20 Dec 2022.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in