AzTrials
AzTrials

Multiple SclerosisPhase 3NCT00370071

Open Label Study to Evaluate Effect, Safety and Tolerability of Betaferon Standard Dose of 250µg in Patients of Chinese Origin With Multiple Sclerosis

A Phase 3 study testing Interferon beta-1b (Betaseron, BAY86-5046) in people with Multiple Sclerosis, run by Bayer at 3 sites in China.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The purpose of this study is to determine if the study drug is effective and safe in the treatment of Multiple Sclerosis (MS) in patients of Chinese origin. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 16 to 55 years
Conditions the study is for
Multiple Sclerosis
What is being tested?
Interferon beta-1b (Betaseron, BAY86-5046)
Type of treatment
Injection or infusion
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
39 participants
Where
3 sitesChina
Study dates
Nov 2006to Sep 2008
Phase
Phase 3
Are there results?
Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 16 to 55 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Child, Adult

Who may be able to join

  • Chinese origin
  • diagnosis of Relapsing remitting multiple sclerosis or secondary progressive multiple sclerosis

Who cannot join

  • Any disease other than Multiple Sclerosis (MS) that could better explain the patients signs and symptoms
  • HIV (human immunodeficiency virus) infections
  • Hepatitis A
  • Syphilis
  • immunodeficiency
  • rheumatic disease or Sjogren syndrome
Show all 13Show fewer
  • heart disease
  • severe depression
  • pregnancy or lactation
  • conditions interfering with Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI)
  • Gadolinium DTPA (Gadovist, contrast agent) allergy
  • allergy against human proteins, paracetamol, acetaminophen and ibuprofen intolerance
  • participation in other trial

Trial locations and contacts

3 sites in 1 country.

China3 sites
  • Study site

    Beijing, 100050

  • Study site

    Beijing, 100730

  • Study site

    Shanghai, 200040

Other trials in China

About this study

Official title: Open Label Study to Evaluate the Effect, Safety and Tolerability of 250µg (8 MIU) Interferon Beta 1b (Betaferon) Given Subcutaneously Every Other Day (for 24 Weeks) in Patients of Chinese Origin With Multiple Sclerosis

The purpose of this study is to determine if the study drug is effective and safe in the treatment of Multiple Sclerosis (MS) in patients of Chinese origin.

Read the detailed description

The study has previously been posted by Schering AG, Germany. Schering AG, Germany has been renamed to Bayer HealthCare AG, Germany.

Bayer HealthCare AG, Germany is the sponsor of the trial.

Being tested
Interferon beta-1b (Betaseron, BAY86-5046)
Keywords
MS
Medical subject headings
Multiple Sclerosis

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Interferon beta-1b (Betaseron, BAY86-5046)Drug

    Interferon beta-1b 250 μg (8 MIU) subcutaneously (sc) every other day (e.o.d.)

Study groups in NCT00370071
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Interferon beta-1b (Betaseron, BAY86-5046)ExperimentalInterferon beta-1b 250 μg (8 MIU) subcutaneously (sc) every other day (e.o.d.)
Receives: Drug: Interferon beta-1b (Betaseron, BAY86-5046)

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Difference Between the Number of Newly Active Lesions in Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) Per Three Months During the 6-month Treatment Period and the Number of Newly Active Lesions During 3-month Pre-treatment

    The primary efficacy variable was calculated by subtracting the number of newly active lesions during the 3-month pre-treatment period from the cumulative number of newly active lesions during the 6-month treatment period divided by 2 (number of newly active lesions per three months, new lesion frequency per 3 months)

    Measured: after 6 months of treatment as compared to 3-month pre-treatment

Secondary outcomes (11)
  1. Difference Between the Number of New Gadolinium (Gd)-Enhancing Lesions Per 3 Months During the 6-month Treatment Period and the Number of New Gd-enhancing Lesions During 3-month Pre-treatment

    This secondary endpoint (component of the primary endpoint) was calculated by subtracting the number of new Gd-enhancing lesions during the 3-month pre-treatment period from the cumulative number of new Gd-enhancing lesions during the 6-month treatment period divided by 2 (number of new Gd-enhancing lesions per three months)

    Measured: after 6 months of treatment as compared to 3-month pre-treatment

  2. Difference Between the Number of New or Enlarging T2 Lesions Per 3 Months During the 6-month Treatment Period and the Number of New or Enlarging T2 Lesions During 3-month Pre-treatment

    This secondary endpoint (component of the primary endpoint) was calculated by subtracting the number of new or enlarging T2 lesions during the 3-month pre-treatment period from the cumulative number of new or enlarging T2 lesions during the 6-month treatment period divided by 2 (number of new T2 lesions per three months) based on non-enhancing lesions on T1 weighted scans

    Measured: after 6 months of treatment as compared to the 3-month pre-treatment

  3. Volume of Gadolinium-enhancing Lesions at Baseline, Weeks 12 and 24

    In the categories listed below, "N" signifies the number of subjects evaluable for the timepoints.

    Measured: Baseline, Weeks 12 and 24

  4. Number of New Gadolinium (T1)-Enhancing Lesions at Baseline, Weeks 12 and 24

    In the categories listed below, "N" signifies the number of subjects evaluable for the timepoints.

    Measured: Baseline, Weeks 12 and 24

  5. Number of T2 Lesions at Baseline, Weeks 12 and 24

    In the categories listed below, "N" signifies the number of subjects evaluable for the timepoints.

    Measured: Baseline, Weeks 12 and 24

  6. Assessment of Relapses: Relapse Rate

    A relapse was defined as the appearance of a new neurological abnormality or worsening of previously stable or improving pre-existing neurological abnormality, separated by at least 30 days from onset of a preceding clinical event. The abnormality must be present for at least 24 hours and occur in the absence of fever (axillary temperature more than (>) 37.5 degree celsius / 99.5 degree fahrenheit) or known infection. A relapse must be confirmed by a documented report from a physician or by objective assessment. The relapse rate was calculated on an annualized basis. Annualized relapse rate is the average number of relapses in a year calculated by negative binomial regression as the sum of confirmed relapses of all subjects in the group divided by the sum of the number of days on study of all subjects in the group and multiplied by 365.25.

    Measured: Baseline up to Week 24

  7. Assessment of Relapses: Number of Relapses

    A relapse was defined as the appearance of a new neurological abnormality or worsening of previously stable or improving pre-existing neurological abnormality, separated by at least 30 days from onset of a preceding clinical event. The abnormality must be present for at least 24 hours and occur in the absence of fever (axillary temperature >37.5 degree celsius / 99.5 degree fahrenheit) or known infection. A relapse must be confirmed by a documented report from a physician or by objective assessment. In the categories listed below, "N" signifies the number of subjects evaluable for the timepoints, and same subjects were counted more than once under each category.

    Measured: 3 and 6 months

  8. Assessment of Relapses: Percentage of Relapse-free Subjects After 24 Weeks

    A relapse was defined as the appearance of a new neurological abnormality or worsening of previously stable or improving pre-existing neurological abnormality, separated by at least 30 days from onset of a preceding clinical event. The abnormality must be present for at least 24 hours and occur in the absence of fever (axillary temperature >37.5 degree celsius / 99.5 degree fahrenheit) or known infection. A relapse must be confirmed by a documented report from a physician or by objective assessment.

    Measured: After 24 weeks

  9. Assessment of Relapses: Relapse Severity

    A relapse was defined as the appearance of a new neurological abnormality or worsening of previously stable or improving pre-existing neurological abnormality, separated by at least 30 days from onset of a preceding clinical event. The abnormality must be present for at least 24 hours and occur in the absence of fever (axillary temperature >37.5 degree celsius / 99.5 degree fahrenheit) or known infection. A relapse must be confirmed by a documented report from a physician or by objective assessment. A major relapse was defined based on changes on EDSS with the following additional criteria to be met: objective neurological impairment, correlating with the subject's reported symptoms, defined as either increase in at least one of the functional systems of the EDSS score or increase of the total EDSS score. Relapses which did not meet the criteria of major relapses were considered as non-major.

    Measured: Baseline up to Week 24

  10. Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS)

    The EDSS is a scale based on the standardized neurological examination which comprised of optic, brain stem/cranial nerves, pyramidal, cerebellar, sensory, vegetative, and cerebral functions, as well as walking ability. The EDSS scores range from 0.0 (normal) to 10.0 (dead). A score of 2 to 3 indicates minimal to moderate disability.

    Measured: Pre-treatment on Day 1, Week 24

  11. Percentage of Subjects Without EDSS Progression

    The EDSS is a scale based on the standardized neurological examination which comprised of optic, brain stem/cranial nerves, pyramidal, cerebellar, sensory, vegetative, and cerebral functions, as well as walking ability.The EDSS scores range from 0.0 (normal) to 10.0 (dead). A score of 2 to 3 indicates minimal to moderate disability. An EDSS progression was defined as increase in EDSS greater than or equal to (>=) 1.0 points (in the treatment period as compared to baseline).

    Measured: Baseline up to Week 24

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted30 Aug 2006 (estimated)
  2. Study startNov 2006
  3. Primary completionSep 2008
  4. Study completionSep 2008

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 3
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Non-randomised
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
39 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT00370071
Sponsor's protocol ID
91386
Other IDs
MP-00102, 308720, 2014-004613-93, 2014
Status last verified
Sep 2015
First submitted
29 Aug 2006
Last updated
29 Oct 2015
Data monitoring committee
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 3 study testing Interferon beta-1b (Betaseron, BAY86-5046) in people with Multiple Sclerosis, run by Bayer at 3 sites in China.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 13 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 29 Oct 2015. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 3 sites in China. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this phase mean?

Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 10 Feb 2010). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Difference Between the Number of Newly Active Lesions in Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) Per Three Months During the 6-month Treatment Period and the Number of Newly Active Lesions During 3-month Pre-treatment (time frame: after 6 months of treatment as compared to 3-month pre-treatment). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 29 Oct 2015.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in