Multiple SclerosisPhase 3NCT00370071
Open Label Study to Evaluate Effect, Safety and Tolerability of Betaferon Standard Dose of 250µg in Patients of Chinese Origin With Multiple Sclerosis
A Phase 3 study testing Interferon beta-1b (Betaseron, BAY86-5046) in people with Multiple Sclerosis, run by Bayer at 3 sites in China.
Trial summary
The purpose of this study is to determine if the study drug is effective and safe in the treatment of Multiple Sclerosis (MS) in patients of Chinese origin. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 16 to 55 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Multiple Sclerosis
- What is being tested?
- Interferon beta-1b (Betaseron, BAY86-5046)
- Type of treatment
- Injection or infusion
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 39 participants
- Where
- 3 sitesChina
- Study dates
- Nov 2006to Sep 2008
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 16 to 55 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Child, Adult
Who may be able to join
- Chinese origin
- diagnosis of Relapsing remitting multiple sclerosis or secondary progressive multiple sclerosis
Who cannot join
- Any disease other than Multiple Sclerosis (MS) that could better explain the patients signs and symptoms
- HIV (human immunodeficiency virus) infections
- Hepatitis A
- Syphilis
- immunodeficiency
- rheumatic disease or Sjogren syndrome
Show all 13Show fewer
- heart disease
- severe depression
- pregnancy or lactation
- conditions interfering with Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI)
- Gadolinium DTPA (Gadovist, contrast agent) allergy
- allergy against human proteins, paracetamol, acetaminophen and ibuprofen intolerance
- participation in other trial
Trial locations and contacts
3 sites in 1 country.
China3 sites
Study site
Beijing, 100050
Study site
Beijing, 100730
Study site
Shanghai, 200040
About this study
Official title: Open Label Study to Evaluate the Effect, Safety and Tolerability of 250µg (8 MIU) Interferon Beta 1b (Betaferon) Given Subcutaneously Every Other Day (for 24 Weeks) in Patients of Chinese Origin With Multiple Sclerosis
The purpose of this study is to determine if the study drug is effective and safe in the treatment of Multiple Sclerosis (MS) in patients of Chinese origin.
Read the detailed description
The study has previously been posted by Schering AG, Germany. Schering AG, Germany has been renamed to Bayer HealthCare AG, Germany.
Bayer HealthCare AG, Germany is the sponsor of the trial.
- Conditions
- Multiple Sclerosis
- Being tested
- Interferon beta-1b (Betaseron, BAY86-5046)
- Keywords
- MS
- Medical subject headings
- Multiple Sclerosis
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Interferon beta-1b (Betaseron, BAY86-5046)Drug
Interferon beta-1b 250 μg (8 MIU) subcutaneously (sc) every other day (e.o.d.)
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Interferon beta-1b (Betaseron, BAY86-5046) | Experimental | Interferon beta-1b 250 μg (8 MIU) subcutaneously (sc) every other day (e.o.d.) Receives: Drug: Interferon beta-1b (Betaseron, BAY86-5046) |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Difference Between the Number of Newly Active Lesions in Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) Per Three Months During the 6-month Treatment Period and the Number of Newly Active Lesions During 3-month Pre-treatment
The primary efficacy variable was calculated by subtracting the number of newly active lesions during the 3-month pre-treatment period from the cumulative number of newly active lesions during the 6-month treatment period divided by 2 (number of newly active lesions per three months, new lesion frequency per 3 months)
Measured: after 6 months of treatment as compared to 3-month pre-treatment
Secondary outcomes (11)
Difference Between the Number of New Gadolinium (Gd)-Enhancing Lesions Per 3 Months During the 6-month Treatment Period and the Number of New Gd-enhancing Lesions During 3-month Pre-treatment
This secondary endpoint (component of the primary endpoint) was calculated by subtracting the number of new Gd-enhancing lesions during the 3-month pre-treatment period from the cumulative number of new Gd-enhancing lesions during the 6-month treatment period divided by 2 (number of new Gd-enhancing lesions per three months)
Measured: after 6 months of treatment as compared to 3-month pre-treatment
Difference Between the Number of New or Enlarging T2 Lesions Per 3 Months During the 6-month Treatment Period and the Number of New or Enlarging T2 Lesions During 3-month Pre-treatment
This secondary endpoint (component of the primary endpoint) was calculated by subtracting the number of new or enlarging T2 lesions during the 3-month pre-treatment period from the cumulative number of new or enlarging T2 lesions during the 6-month treatment period divided by 2 (number of new T2 lesions per three months) based on non-enhancing lesions on T1 weighted scans
Measured: after 6 months of treatment as compared to the 3-month pre-treatment
Volume of Gadolinium-enhancing Lesions at Baseline, Weeks 12 and 24
In the categories listed below, "N" signifies the number of subjects evaluable for the timepoints.
Measured: Baseline, Weeks 12 and 24
Number of New Gadolinium (T1)-Enhancing Lesions at Baseline, Weeks 12 and 24
In the categories listed below, "N" signifies the number of subjects evaluable for the timepoints.
Measured: Baseline, Weeks 12 and 24
Number of T2 Lesions at Baseline, Weeks 12 and 24
In the categories listed below, "N" signifies the number of subjects evaluable for the timepoints.
Measured: Baseline, Weeks 12 and 24
Assessment of Relapses: Relapse Rate
A relapse was defined as the appearance of a new neurological abnormality or worsening of previously stable or improving pre-existing neurological abnormality, separated by at least 30 days from onset of a preceding clinical event. The abnormality must be present for at least 24 hours and occur in the absence of fever (axillary temperature more than (>) 37.5 degree celsius / 99.5 degree fahrenheit) or known infection. A relapse must be confirmed by a documented report from a physician or by objective assessment. The relapse rate was calculated on an annualized basis. Annualized relapse rate is the average number of relapses in a year calculated by negative binomial regression as the sum of confirmed relapses of all subjects in the group divided by the sum of the number of days on study of all subjects in the group and multiplied by 365.25.
Measured: Baseline up to Week 24
Assessment of Relapses: Number of Relapses
A relapse was defined as the appearance of a new neurological abnormality or worsening of previously stable or improving pre-existing neurological abnormality, separated by at least 30 days from onset of a preceding clinical event. The abnormality must be present for at least 24 hours and occur in the absence of fever (axillary temperature >37.5 degree celsius / 99.5 degree fahrenheit) or known infection. A relapse must be confirmed by a documented report from a physician or by objective assessment. In the categories listed below, "N" signifies the number of subjects evaluable for the timepoints, and same subjects were counted more than once under each category.
Measured: 3 and 6 months
Assessment of Relapses: Percentage of Relapse-free Subjects After 24 Weeks
A relapse was defined as the appearance of a new neurological abnormality or worsening of previously stable or improving pre-existing neurological abnormality, separated by at least 30 days from onset of a preceding clinical event. The abnormality must be present for at least 24 hours and occur in the absence of fever (axillary temperature >37.5 degree celsius / 99.5 degree fahrenheit) or known infection. A relapse must be confirmed by a documented report from a physician or by objective assessment.
Measured: After 24 weeks
Assessment of Relapses: Relapse Severity
A relapse was defined as the appearance of a new neurological abnormality or worsening of previously stable or improving pre-existing neurological abnormality, separated by at least 30 days from onset of a preceding clinical event. The abnormality must be present for at least 24 hours and occur in the absence of fever (axillary temperature >37.5 degree celsius / 99.5 degree fahrenheit) or known infection. A relapse must be confirmed by a documented report from a physician or by objective assessment. A major relapse was defined based on changes on EDSS with the following additional criteria to be met: objective neurological impairment, correlating with the subject's reported symptoms, defined as either increase in at least one of the functional systems of the EDSS score or increase of the total EDSS score. Relapses which did not meet the criteria of major relapses were considered as non-major.
Measured: Baseline up to Week 24
Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS)
The EDSS is a scale based on the standardized neurological examination which comprised of optic, brain stem/cranial nerves, pyramidal, cerebellar, sensory, vegetative, and cerebral functions, as well as walking ability. The EDSS scores range from 0.0 (normal) to 10.0 (dead). A score of 2 to 3 indicates minimal to moderate disability.
Measured: Pre-treatment on Day 1, Week 24
Percentage of Subjects Without EDSS Progression
The EDSS is a scale based on the standardized neurological examination which comprised of optic, brain stem/cranial nerves, pyramidal, cerebellar, sensory, vegetative, and cerebral functions, as well as walking ability.The EDSS scores range from 0.0 (normal) to 10.0 (dead). A score of 2 to 3 indicates minimal to moderate disability. An EDSS progression was defined as increase in EDSS greater than or equal to (>=) 1.0 points (in the treatment period as compared to baseline).
Measured: Baseline up to Week 24
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted30 Aug 2006 (estimated)
- Study startNov 2006
- Primary completionSep 2008
- Study completionSep 2008
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Other trials for Multiple SclerosisStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by BayerThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Non-randomised
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 39 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Bayer
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Bayer Study Director, Study director, Bayer
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00370071
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 91386
- Other IDs
- MP-00102, 308720, 2014-004613-93, 2014
- Status last verified
- Sep 2015
- First submitted
- 29 Aug 2006
- Last updated
- 29 Oct 2015
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 29 Oct 2015. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Open Label Study to Evaluate the Effect, Safety and Tolerability of 250µg (8 MIU) Interferon Beta 1b (Betaferon) Given Subcutaneously Every Other Day (for 24 Weeks) in Patients of Chinese Origin With Multiple Sclerosis
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00370071
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 91386
- Conditions
- Multiple Sclerosis
- Keywords
- MS
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 39 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- BayerIndustry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Study start
- Nov 2006
- Primary completion
- Sep 2008 (actual)
- Study completion
- Sep 2008 (actual)
- First posted
- 30 Aug 2006 (estimated)
- Results
- Posted 10 Feb 2010
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The purpose of this study is to determine if the study drug is effective and safe in the treatment of Multiple Sclerosis (MS) in patients of Chinese origin.
Detailed description
The study has previously been posted by Schering AG, Germany. Schering AG, Germany has been renamed to Bayer HealthCare AG, Germany.
Bayer HealthCare AG, Germany is the sponsor of the trial.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Non-randomised
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 1
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Interferon beta-1b (Betaseron, BAY86-5046) | Experimental | Drug: Interferon beta-1b (Betaseron, BAY86-5046)Interferon beta-1b 250 μg (8 MIU) subcutaneously (sc) every other day (e.o.d.) |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 16 to 55 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Child, Adult
Key inclusion criteria (2 listed)
- Chinese origin
- diagnosis of Relapsing remitting multiple sclerosis or secondary progressive multiple sclerosis
Key exclusion criteria (13 listed)
- Any disease other than Multiple Sclerosis (MS) that could better explain the patients signs and symptoms
- HIV (human immunodeficiency virus) infections
- Hepatitis A
- Syphilis
- immunodeficiency
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Interferon beta-1b (Betaseron, BAY86-5046)Interferon beta-1b 250 μg (8 MIU) subcutaneously (sc) every other day (e.o.d.) | Drug | Interferon beta-1b (Betaseron, BAY86-5046) |
Primary outcome
Difference Between the Number of Newly Active Lesions in Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) Per Three Months During the 6-month Treatment Period and the Number of Newly Active Lesions During 3-month Pre-treatment
Time frame: after 6 months of treatment as compared to 3-month pre-treatment
The primary efficacy variable was calculated by subtracting the number of newly active lesions during the 3-month pre-treatment period from the cumulative number of newly active lesions during the 6-month treatment period divided by 2 (number of newly active lesions per three months, new lesion frequency per 3 months)
11 secondary outcomes
Difference Between the Number of New Gadolinium (Gd)-Enhancing Lesions Per 3 Months During the 6-month Treatment Period and the Number of New Gd-enhancing Lesions During 3-month Pre-treatment
Time frame: after 6 months of treatment as compared to 3-month pre-treatment
Difference Between the Number of New or Enlarging T2 Lesions Per 3 Months During the 6-month Treatment Period and the Number of New or Enlarging T2 Lesions During 3-month Pre-treatment
Time frame: after 6 months of treatment as compared to the 3-month pre-treatment
Volume of Gadolinium-enhancing Lesions at Baseline, Weeks 12 and 24
Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 12 and 24
Number of New Gadolinium (T1)-Enhancing Lesions at Baseline, Weeks 12 and 24
Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 12 and 24
Number of T2 Lesions at Baseline, Weeks 12 and 24
Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 12 and 24
Assessment of Relapses: Relapse Rate
Time frame: Baseline up to Week 24
Assessment of Relapses: Number of Relapses
Time frame: 3 and 6 months
Assessment of Relapses: Percentage of Relapse-free Subjects After 24 Weeks
Time frame: After 24 weeks
Assessment of Relapses: Relapse Severity
Time frame: Baseline up to Week 24
Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS)
Time frame: Pre-treatment on Day 1, Week 24
Percentage of Subjects Without EDSS Progression
Time frame: Baseline up to Week 24
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 29 Oct 2015.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- Click here to find information about studies related to Bayer Healthcare products conducted in EuropeLink provided by the sponsor.
Related trials for Multiple Sclerosis
Active, not recruitingPhase 3
An Extension Study of Ublituximab in Participants With Relapsing Multiple Sclerosis
Relapsing Multiple Sclerosis (RMS)
RecruitingObservational study
A Study Evaluating the Real World Experience of Participants Treated With BRIUMVI® (Ublituximab-xiiy) for Relapsing Multiple Sclerosis (RMS)
Relapsing Multiple Sclerosis, Multiple Sclerosis
RecruitingObservational study
Non-interventional Study of Subcutaneous Ocrelizumab in Persons With Relapsing-Remitting Multiple Sclerosis
Relapsing-Remitting Multiple Sclerosis
RecruitingPhase 2
A Phase 2a Study of SUN-627 in Participants With Non-Active Secondary Progressive and Primary Progressive Multiple Sclerosis (SPMS/PPMS)
Primary Progressive Multiple Sclerosis, Primary Progressive MS
RecruitingPhase 4
A Study of Ocrelizumab Administered Subcutaneously in Participants With Multiple Sclerosis Who Switch From an Approved Anti-CD20 Therapy
Multiple Sclerosis
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Bayer Study Director study director
Bayer
3 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 3 study testing Interferon beta-1b (Betaseron, BAY86-5046) in people with Multiple Sclerosis, run by Bayer at 3 sites in China.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 13 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 29 Oct 2015. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 3 sites in China. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 10 Feb 2010). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Difference Between the Number of Newly Active Lesions in Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) Per Three Months During the 6-month Treatment Period and the Number of Newly Active Lesions During 3-month Pre-treatment (time frame: after 6 months of treatment as compared to 3-month pre-treatment). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 29 Oct 2015.