AzTrials
AzTrials

Esophageal CancerNCT00372450

Plastic Stents Compared With Metal Stents in Treating Patients With Malignant Dysphagia Caused by Esophageal Cancer or Gastroesophageal Junction Cancer

A study testing management of therapy complications and quality-of-life assessment in people with Esophageal Cancer and Gastrointestinal Complications, run by Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center at Johns Hopkins at 1 site in United States.

Withdrawn

Withdrawn. The study stopped before anyone enrolled.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

RATIONALE: Placing a stent in the esophagus may lessen swallowing difficulties and improve quality of life in patients with malignant dysphagia caused by esophageal cancer or gastroesophageal junction cancer. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 120 years
What is being tested?
management of therapy complications and quality-of-life assessment
Type of treatment
Surgery or procedure
How many people
0 participants
Where
1 siteUnited States
Study dates
Dec 2006to 11 Apr 2008
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 120 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

DISEASE CHARACTERISTICS:

  • Histologically confirmed primary cancer of the esophagus or gastroesophageal junction
  • Squamous cell or other type
  • Diagnosis of malignant dysphagia
  • Disease deemed surgically inoperable, but may be any of the following:
  • Locally contained
  • Locally advanced
  • Metastatic
  • Unresponsive to previous chemoradiotherapy
  • Recurrent despite previous surgical resection
  • Must be either an inpatient OR outpatient at Johns Hopkins Hospital
  • No known tracheal compression by tumor burden

PATIENT CHARACTERISTICS:

  • Karnofsky performance status 50-100%
  • Life expectancy ≥ 6 months
  • Platelet count > 50,000/mm³
  • INR < 1.5

PRIOR CONCURRENT THERAPY:

  • See Disease Characteristics
  • Prior surgery, chemotherapy, biologic therapy, or radiotherapy allowed
  • No concurrent surgery, chemotherapy, biologic therapy, or radiotherapy

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

United States1 site
  • Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center at Johns Hopkins

    Baltimore, Maryland, 21231-2410

Other trials in United States

About this study

Official title: A Quality of Life Comparison in Patients With Malignant Dysphagia Treated With Either Self-Expanding Plastic Stents (SEPS) or Self-Expanding Metal Stents (SEMS)

RATIONALE: Placing a stent in the esophagus may lessen swallowing difficulties and improve quality of life in patients with malignant dysphagia caused by esophageal cancer or gastroesophageal junction cancer.

PURPOSE: This randomized clinical trial is studying self-expanding plastic stents to see how well they work compared with self-expanding metal stents in treating patients with malignant dysphagia caused by esophageal cancer or gastroesophageal junction cancer.

Read the detailed description

OBJECTIVES:

Primary

  • Assess differences from baseline in health-related quality of life of patients with malignant dysphagia due to cancer of the esophagus or gastroesophageal junction palliated with self-expanding plastic stents (SEPS) compared to those who receive self-expanding metal stents (SEMS).

Secondary

  • Perform a cost-effective analysis of each type of stent by independent evaluation of the rates of SEPS-related and SEMS-related morbidity that necessitates repeat endoscopic interventions and/or additional healthcare costs in these patients.
  • Analyze effective palliation (degree and duration of improvement of dysphagia) in these patients.
  • Determine the individual rates of complication associated with each type of esophageal stent in these patients.

OUTLINE: This is a randomized, controlled study. Patients are randomized to 1 of 2 treatment arms.

  • Arm I: Patients undergo placement of a self-expanding metal stent on day 1.
  • Arm II: Patients undergo placement of a self-expanding plastic stent on day 1. Health-related quality of life is assessed at baseline, 30 days, and 3 months.

PROJECTED ACCRUAL: A total of 90 patients will be accrued for this study.

Being tested
management of therapy complications, quality-of-life assessment
Keywords
recurrent esophageal cancer, stage III esophageal cancer, stage IV esophageal cancer, squamous cell carcinoma of the esophagus, adenocarcinoma of the esophagus, gastrointestinal complications
Medical subject headings
Esophageal Neoplasms, Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma, Adenocarcinoma Of Esophagus

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • management of therapy complicationsProcedure or surgery

  • quality-of-life assessmentProcedure or surgery

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Change in health-related quality of life from baseline to 30 days and 3 months after self-expanding plastic stent or self-expanding metal stent placement

Secondary outcomes (5)
  1. Cost effectiveness of each type of stent

  2. Degree and duration of improvement of dysphagia

  3. Stent-related morbidities

  4. Time to event (time until first complication)

  5. Overall rate of mortality

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted7 Sep 2006 (estimated)
  2. Study startDec 2006 (estimated)
  3. Primary completion11 Apr 2008
  4. Study completion11 Apr 2008

Why it stopped: low accrual

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Supportive care
Allocation
Randomised
Enrolment
0 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT00372450
Sponsor's protocol ID
J05109
Other IDs
CDR0000489157, JHOC-J05109, NA_00001547
Status last verified
Nov 2008
First submitted
6 Sep 2006
Last updated
20 Mar 2019
Results posted
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing management of therapy complications and quality-of-life assessment in people with Esophageal Cancer and Gastrointestinal Complications, run by Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center at Johns Hopkins at 1 site in United States.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: withdrawn, as of the sponsor's last update on 20 Mar 2019. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study was withdrawn before enrolling participants, so there are no results.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Change in health-related quality of life from baseline to 30 days and 3 months after self-expanding plastic stent or self-expanding metal stent placement. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 20 Mar 2019.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in