AzTrials
AzTrials

Gastrointestinal Stromal TumorPhase 3NCT00372567

Safety And Effectiveness Of Daily Dosing With Sunitinib Or Imatinib In Patients With Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors

A Phase 3 study testing sunitinib malate and imatinib mesylate in people with Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumor, run by Pfizer at 25 sites in 7 countries.

Terminated

Stopped early. The study ended before it was planned to and will not resume.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

A phase IIIb study of patients with gastrointestinal stromal tumors who have had progressive disease while on 400 mg imatinib. Patients will be randomly assigned to either sunitinib 37.5 mg daily or imatinib 800 mg daily. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumor
What is being tested?
sunitinib malate and imatinib mesylate
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
69 participants
Where
25 sitesin 7 countries
Study dates
Jun 2007to Nov 2009
Phase
Phase 3
Are there results?
Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Patients with gastrointestinal stromal tumors whose disease has progressed on imatinib 400 mg daily.

Who cannot join

  • Current treatment with any chemotherapy other than imatinib.
  • Current treatment with any dose of imatinib other than 400 mg

Trial locations and contacts

25 sites in 7 countries.

25 sites in 7 countries

United States6 sites
  • Pfizer Investigational Site

    City of Saint Peters, Missouri, 63376

  • Pfizer Investigational Site

    Creve Coeur, Missouri, 63141

  • Pfizer Investigational Site

    Detroit, Michigan, 48201

  • Pfizer Investigational Site

    Farmington Hills, Michigan, 48334

  • Pfizer Investigational Site

    Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 19111

  • Pfizer Investigational Site

    St Louis, Missouri, 63110

Other trials in United States

United Kingdom6 sites
  • Pfizer Investigational Site

    Glasgow, G12 0YH

  • Pfizer Investigational Site

    Leeds, LS9 7TF

  • Pfizer Investigational Site

    London, NW1 2PG

  • Pfizer Investigational Site

    London, SW3 6JJ

  • Pfizer Investigational Site

    London, W1

  • Pfizer Investigational Site

    Manchester, M20 4BX

Other trials in United Kingdom

Hong Kong3 sites
  • Pfizer Investigational Site

    Hong Kong, 0

  • Pfizer Investigational Site

    Lai Chi Kok, Kowloon, 0

  • Pfizer Investigational Site

    Tuenmen, New Territories, 0

Other trials in Hong Kong

Italy3 sites
  • Pfizer Investigational Site

    Bologna, 40138

  • Pfizer Investigational Site

    Milan, 20133

  • Pfizer Investigational Site

    San Giovanni Rotondo, 71013

Other trials in Italy

South Korea3 sites
  • Pfizer Investigational Site

    Seoul, 110-744

  • Pfizer Investigational Site

    Seoul, 135-710

  • Pfizer Investigational Site

    Seoul, 138-736

Other trials in South Korea

Germany2 sites
  • Pfizer Investigational Site

    Göttingen, 37075

  • Pfizer Investigational Site

    Hamburg, 22767

Other trials in Germany

Spain2 sites
  • Pfizer Investigational Site

    Barcelona, Barcelona, 08036

  • Pfizer Investigational Site

    Valencia, Valencia, 46009

Other trials in Spain

About this study

Official title: A Phase IIIB, Randomized, Active Controlled Open-Label Study Of Sunitinib (Sutent) 37.5 Mg Daily Vs Imatinib Mesylate 800 Mg Daily In The Treatment Of Patients With Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors (GIST) Who Have Had Progressive Disease While On 400 Mg Daily Of Imatinib

A phase IIIb study of patients with gastrointestinal stromal tumors who have had progressive disease while on 400 mg imatinib. Patients will be randomly assigned to either sunitinib 37.5 mg daily or imatinib 800 mg daily. This study will find out the benefits and potential side effects of taking sunitinib or imatinib for approximately one year.

Read the detailed description

The study prematurely discontinued on July 27, 2009 due to poor recruitment and operational futility as a result of changes in clinical practice. There were no safety or efficacy concerns regarding the study in the decision to terminate the trial.

Being tested
sunitinib malate, imatinib mesylate
Medical subject headings
Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • sunitinib malateDrug

    Also called Sutent

    37.5 mg daily

  • imatinib mesylateDrug

    800mg daily

Study groups in NCT00372567
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
AExperimentalNot described
Receives: Drug: sunitinib malate
BActive comparatorNot described
Receives: Drug: imatinib mesylate

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Progression-Free Survival (PFS)

    Time from randomization to the first documentation of tumor progression or death due to any cause in the absence of documented tumor progression, whichever was earlier.

    Measured: Baseline, Week 5, and every 8 weeks until Year 2

Secondary outcomes (13)
  1. Overall Survival (OS)

    Time from date of randomization to the date of death. In the absence of confirmation of death, survival time was censored to the last date the participant was known to be alive.

    Measured: Baseline up to 2 years

  2. Time to Pain Relief Response (TTPR)

    Pain relief response defined as a 50 percent (%) or more reduction in the McGill Pain Questionaire - Present Pain Intensity (MPQ-PPI) score (0=no pain to 5=excruciating pain) and/or analgesic use from baseline for at least 3 consecutive weeks. Analgesic use scores were based on 1 point per non narcotic dose of medication and 4 points per dose of narcotic medication.

    Measured: Day 28 of Cycle 1 up to 26

  3. Time to Treatment Failure (TTF)

    TTF included death for any reason, treatment termination due to intolerable toxicity, or withdrawal of consent, whichever occurred first.

    Measured: Day 28 of Cycle 1 up to 26

  4. Number of Participants With Objective Response of Complete Response or Partial Response

    Number of participants with objective response based assessment of confirmed complete response (CR) or partial response (PR) according to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST). CR was defined as the disappearance of all target lesions. PR was defined as a greater than or equal to 30% decrease in the sum of the longest dimensions of the target lesions taking as a reference the baseline sum longest dimensions.

    Measured: Day 28 of Cycle 1 up to 26

  5. Time to Tumor Response (TTR)

    Time from date of randomization to first documentation of objective tumor response (partial or complete response). Confirmed complete response (CR) and partial response (PR) according to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST). CR was defined as the disappearance of all target lesions. PR was defined as a greater than or equal to 30% decrease in the sum of the longest dimensions of the target lesions taking as a reference the baseline sum longest dimensions.

    Measured: Day 28 of Cycle 1 up to 26

  6. Duration of Response (DR)

    Time from start of first documentation of objective response(complete or partial response) that was subsequently confirmed to first documentation of objective tumor progression or death due to any cause, whichever occurred first.

    Confirmed complete response (CR) and partial response (PR)according to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST). CR was defined as the disappearance of all target lesions. PR was defined as a greater than or equal to 30% decrease in the sum of the longest dimensions of the target lesions taking as a reference the baseline sum longest dimensions.

    Measured: Day 28 of Cycle 1 up to 26

  7. Time to Pain Progression (TTPP)

    TTPP is the number of days from randomization to the first documentation of pain progression (defined as a 50% or more increase in MPQ-PPI score [0=no pain to 5=excruciating pain] or analgesic use from baseline for at least 3 consecutive weeks). Analgesic use scores were based on 1 point per non narcotic dose of medication and 4 points per dose of narcotic medication.

    Measured: Day 28 of Cycle 1 up to 26

  8. Number of Participants With Pain Relief Response

    Pain relief response defined as a 50% or more reduction in the McGill Pain Questionaire - Present Pain Intensity (MPQ-PPI) score (0=no pain to 5=excruciating pain) and/or analgesic use from baseline for at least 3 consecutive weeks. Analgesic use scores were based on 1 point per non narcotic dose of medication and 4 points per dose of narcotic medication.

    Measured: Day 28 of Cycle 1 up to 26

  9. Number of Participants With Pain Progression

    Pain progression defined as a 50% or more increase in MPQ-PPI score (0=no pain to 5=excruciating pain) or analgesic use from baseline for at least 3 consecutive weeks. Analgesic use scores were based on 1 point per non narcotic dose of medication and 4 points per dose of narcotic medication.

    Measured: Day 28 of Cycle 1 up to 26

  10. Euro Quality of Life (EQ-5D) - Health State Profile Utility Score- Sunitinib Treatment Arm

    EQ-5D: participant rated questionnaire to assess health-related quality of life in terms of a single utility score. Health State Profile component rated current health for 5 domains: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain and discomfort, and anxiety and depression; 1 indicated better health state (no problems); 3 indicated worst health state (eg, "confined to bed"). Scoring formula developed by EuroQol Group assigned utility value for each domain in profile. Score was transformed and results in a total score ranged 0.21 to 1.000; higher score indicated a better health state.

    Measured: Days 1 and 28 of each cycle

  11. Euro Quality of Life (EQ-5D)- Visual Analog Scale (VAS) - Sunitinib Treatment Arm

    EQ-5D: participant rated questionnaire assessed health-related quality of life in terms of a single index value. The VAS component rated current health state on a scale from 0 (worst imaginable health state) to 100 (best imaginable health state); higher scores indicated a better health state.

    Measured: Days 1 and 28 of each cycle

  12. Euro Quality of Life (EQ-5D) - Health State Profile Utility Score - Imatinib Treatment Arm

    EQ-5D: participant rated questionnaire assessed health-related quality of life in terms of a single utility score. Health State Profile component rated current health for 5 domains: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain and discomfort, and anxiety and depression; 1 indicated better health state (no problems); 3 indicated worst health state (eg, "confined to bed"). Scoring formula developed by EuroQol Group assigned utility value for each domain in the profile. Score was transformed and results in a total score ranged 0.21 to 1.000; higher score indicated a better health state.

    Measured: Days 1 and 28 of each cycle

  13. Euro Quality of Life (EQ-5D)- Visual Analog Scale (VAS) - Imatinib Treatment Arm

    EQ-5D: participant rated questionnaire assessed health-related quality of life in terms of a single index value. The VAS component rated current health state on a scale from 0 (worst imaginable health state) to 100 (best imaginable health state); higher scores indicated a better health state.

    Measured: Days 1 and 28 of each cycle

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted7 Sep 2006 (estimated)
  2. Study startJun 2007
  3. Primary completionNov 2009
  4. Study completionNov 2009

Why it stopped: See termination reason in detailed description.

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 3
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
69 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT00372567
Sponsor's protocol ID
A6181112
Status last verified
Mar 2011
First submitted
5 Sep 2006
Last updated
17 Mar 2011
Data monitoring committee
Yes

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 3 study testing sunitinib malate and imatinib mesylate in people with Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumor, run by Pfizer at 25 sites in 7 countries.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 2 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: stopped early, as of the sponsor's last update on 17 Mar 2011. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 25 sites in United States, United Kingdom, Hong Kong, Italy, South Korea and 2 more countries. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this phase mean?

Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 31 Dec 2010). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Progression-Free Survival (PFS) (time frame: Baseline, Week 5, and every 8 weeks until Year 2). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 17 Mar 2011.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in