AzTrials
AzTrials

HysterectomyPhase 3NCT00373464

Etoricoxib for Routine Post-operative Pain Prophylaxis in Laparoscopic Surgery

A Phase 3 study testing etoricoxib in people with Hysterectomy and Tubal Excision, run by Ullevaal University Hospital at 1 site in Norway.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The aim of this trial is to compare if a single dose of oral etoricoxib 120 mg will have equal post-operative analgesic efficacy as an optimal regiment of intravenous ketorolac 30 mg + 30 mg during the first 18 hours (+/- 1 hour) after gynaecologic laparoscopic surgical procedures, where the need for post-operative… Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 70 years, women only
Conditions the study is for
Hysterectomy, Tubal Excision, Ovariectomy
What is being tested?
etoricoxib
How many people
126 participants
Where
1 siteNorway
Study dates
Mar 2006to Mar 2007
Phase
Phase 3
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 70 years
  • Women only
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Patients (American Society of Anaesthesiologists [ASA] I and II) due for elective, laparoscopic gynaecologic surgery with the expected need for post-operative opioids: hysterectomy, removal of tube(s) and/or ovarium.
  • Written informed consent.
  • Weight between 50 and 120 kg.

Who cannot join

  • Patients who use nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory agents (NSAIDs) in the last 48 hours (h) before surgery or are allergic to NSAIDs. Patients using steroids, anti-emetic drugs, or opioids in the last 48 h before surgery.
  • Sensitivity to the study drug or its components.
  • Cardiovascular risk conditions: heart failure, unstable hypertension, coronary artery disease (i.e. angina, previous myocardial infarction, previous coronary artery bypass surgery).
  • Cerebrovascular disease.
  • Other applicable exclusion criteria.

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Norway1 site
  • Ullevaal University Hospital

    Oslo, Oslo

Other trials in Norway

About this study

Official title: Etoricoxib for Routine Post-operative Pain Prophylaxis in Laparoscopic Gynaecologic Surgery With Expected Need of Post-operative Opioids

The aim of this trial is to compare if a single dose of oral etoricoxib 120 mg will have equal post-operative analgesic efficacy as an optimal regiment of intravenous ketorolac 30 mg + 30 mg during the first 18 hours (+/- 1 hour) after gynaecologic laparoscopic surgical procedures, where the need for post-operative opioid is expected.

Read the detailed description

Postoperative pain can contribute to reduce the patient well-being and, if it is pronounced, delay rehabilitation and increase the total cost for nursing and treatment.

As quite extensive surgical procedures presently are being undertaken on an ambulatory basis the need for adequate post-operative pain prophylaxis is stressed. Pain and nausea/vomiting are the most frequent causes of delayed discharge or unanticipated admission to hospital stay after ambulatory surgery (1). As opioids for postoperative pain relief have a lot of unwanted side-effects (e.g. nausea, vomiting, sleepiness, obstipation, disturbed physiological sleep [2]), it has been shown beneficial, both in terms of cost-effectiveness and patient satisfaction, to reduce the need of opioids in post-operative setting by other means (i.e. non-opioid) methods of pain-relief. The concept of multimodal, non-opioid pain prophylaxis and treatment is being advocated as optimal after ambulatory surgery. The most important modes of non-opioid pain prophylaxis, at present, is paracetamol, non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) and local anaesthesia. The best result is achieved when these different modes are used together in a prophylactic manner; the need of rescue opioid analgesics may be reduced by 20-50% and in many cases diminish (3). It has been shown in many studies that the NSAID is an important component in routine post-operative pain prophylaxis, e.g. NSAID in combination with paracetamol provides better analgesic effect than paracetamol alone, and may be equianalgesic to a small-medium dose of opioid (2).

There are four problems with NSAIDs when used for routine pain prophylaxis in ambulatory surgery/anaesthesia: increased bleeding tendency, gastrointestinal ulceration, renal failure and anaphylactic reactions (2-4).

There are definite potential benefits with etoricoxib in ambulatory setting (5-7): Due to cox-II selectivity there is no concern of increased bleeding tendency; thus the drug can be given pre-operatively. It is a potent, oral coxib; thus cheaper and more simple than IV NSAIDs. It has a long duration of effect; thus the need of patient attention is reduced because the first dose lasts for 24 h and a single daily dose will be optimal further on.

It has a lower potential of gastrointestinal ulceration, thus may be used in some patients where conventional NSAIDs may be contraindicated.

It has so far not been shown to have harmful cardiovascular effects in prospective studies of continuous use for at least 12 months in patients with increased risk of cardiovascular complications (ref 8: Edge study).

Study rationale: Etoricoxib has so far been compared with traditional oral NSAIDs and oral coxibs for postoperative pain prophylaxis. However, in many clinical situations the use of pre-operative conventional NSAIDs is not recommended due to the risk of preoperative bleeding. These patients are usually given IV ketorolac during the last part of the procedure as the most efficient alternative for post-operative pain prophylaxis.

It will be of great interest to compare this practice with the use of oral etoricoxib given pre-operatively. If the analgesic quality of an adequate dose etoricoxib is comparable to a ketorolac regimen, the etoricoxib approach will have a lot of potential benefits: simple, cheap, earlier start of analgesia, more longlasting analgesia and less risk of postoperative bleeding and gastrointestinal ulcer. If successful, a single pre-operative dose of etoricoxib may be a routine measure in a majority of all ambulatory surgery patients.

Hypotheses: A single dose pre-operative of oral etoricoxib 120 mg will have equal post-operative analgesic efficacy as an optimal regimen of IV ketorolac 30 mg + 30 mg during the first 18 h( +/- 1 h) after gynaecologic laparoscopic surgical procedure, where the need for post-operative opioid is expected.

Bibliography:

  1. Chung F, Mezei G: Adverse outcomes in ambulatory anesthesia. Can. J Anaesth. 1999; 46:R18-R34.
  2. Dahl V, Raeder JC: Non-opioid postoperative analgesia. Acta Anaesthesiol. Scand. 2000; 44:1191-203.
  3. Dahl V, Raeder JC, Drosdal S, Wathne O, Brynildsrud J: Prophylactic oral ibuprofen or ibuprofen-codeine versus placebo for postoperative pain after primary hip arthroplasty. Acta Anaesthesiol. Scand. 1995; 39:323-6.
  4. Rawal N: Postoperative pain management in day surgery. Anaesthesia 1998; 53 Suppl. 2: 50-2.
  5. Chang DJ, Desjardins PJ et al. The analgesic efficacy of etoricoxib compared with oxycodone/acetaminophen in an acute post-operative pain model. Anest. Analg. 2004; 99; 807-15.
  6. Cochrane DJ, Jarvis B et al. Etoricoxib. Drugs 2003; 62:2637-51.
  7. Malmstrøm K, Sapre A et al. Etoricoxib in acute pain associated with dental surgery. Clin. Ther. 2004; 26:667-79.
  8. The EDGE study: MSD preliminary communication.
Being tested
etoricoxib
Keywords
Postoperative pain, Opioid, Etoricoxib, Ketorolac, Laparoscopic Surgery, Surgical Procedures, Gynecologic
Medical subject headings
Pain, Postoperative

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • etoricoxibDrug

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Equal opioid consumption in both groups postoperatively

Secondary outcomes (1)
  1. Equal visual analogue scale (VAS) and verbal rating scale (VRS) in the first 4 hours

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted8 Sep 2006 (estimated)
  2. Study startMar 2006
  3. Study completionMar 2007

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 3
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
Double blind
Enrolment
126 participants
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT00373464
Sponsor's protocol ID
2005-003078-92
Other IDs
2005
Status last verified
Aug 2005
First submitted
6 Sep 2006
Last updated
1 Jul 2011
Results posted
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 3 study testing etoricoxib in people with Hysterectomy and Tubal Excision, run by Ullevaal University Hospital at 1 site in Norway.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 5 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 1 Jul 2011. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Norway. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this phase mean?

Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Equal opioid consumption in both groups postoperatively. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 1 Jul 2011.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in