AzTrials
AzTrials

SarcoidosisNCT00373555

Endobronchial Ultrasonography in the Diagnosis of Sarcoidosis

A study testing Bronchoscopy in people with Sarcoidosis and Mediastinal Diseases, run by University of Calgary at 1 site in Canada.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Sarcoidosis is a benign, inflammatory condition which will typically involve the lungs and lymph glands in the chest. Diagnosis is often confirmed with bronchoscopic biopsy. A new method of performing bronchoscopic biopsy of lymph glands in the chest has now been developed which uses real-time endobronchial… Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 16 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Sarcoidosis, Mediastinal Diseases
What is being tested?
Bronchoscopy
Type of treatment
Surgery or procedure
How many people
50 participants
Where
1 siteCanada
Study dates
Sep 2006to Aug 2008
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 16 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Child, Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • age over 16 years
  • pathological mediastinal or hilar adenopathy (over 1 cm short axis) confirmed on Computed Tomography (CT) of the chest
  • clinical/radiological diagnosis of sarcoidosis is considered likely diagnosis
  • clinical decision made by patient and treating physician to proceed to bronchoscopy

Who cannot join

  • absence of informed consent
  • uncorrected coagulopathy
  • platelets under 100
  • INR over 1.3
  • use of clopidogrel in the 7 days prior to bronchoscopy
  • medical contraindication to bronchoscopy

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Canada1 site
  • Health Sciences Centre

    Calgary, Alberta, T2N 4N1

Other trials in Canada

About this study

Sarcoidosis is a benign, inflammatory condition which will typically involve the lungs and lymph glands in the chest. Diagnosis is often confirmed with bronchoscopic biopsy. A new method of performing bronchoscopic biopsy of lymph glands in the chest has now been developed which uses real-time endobronchial ultrasonography to better locate the lymph glands. While this technique has been proven to be effective in the diagnosis and staging of lung malignancy, its sensitivity for the diagnosis of sarcoidosis is unclear as smaller samples are obtained compared to the standard approach. This study will aim to randomize 50 patients with a clinical suspicion of sarcoidosis to standard biopsy vs. endobronchial ultrasound guided biopsy of the mediastinal lymph glands in order to compare the sensitivity of these tests for sarcoidosis.

Read the detailed description

Sarcoidosis is a benign, inflammatory condition which will typically involve the lungs and mediastinal lymph nodes. The diagnosis of sarcoidosis is usually confirmed with tissue biopsy, especially if patients in whom treatment with corticosteroids is required. Asymptomatic patients not requiring treatment may not require biopsy, although this is commonly performed because of patient's preference in confirming the diagnosis and concerns about other diagnostic possibilities such as lymphoma.

Given the predilection of this disease to the chest, the lung and mediastinal lymph nodes are the most common sites for biopsy. Bronchoscopic samples are often obtained initially given their good sensitivity for this disease and low complication rates. If the diagnosis of sarcoidosis is not confirmed by bronchoscopy, more invasive surgical procedures such as mediastinoscopy or open lung biopsy may be required. As such, any improvement in the minimally invasive methods for diagnosis of this condition would be of benefit these patients and may also lead to cost efficiencies for the health care system.

Transbronchial needle aspiration (TBNA) with a 19 gauge "histology" needle has been the standard bronchoscopic approach to the biopsy of mediastinal lymph nodes in patients with suspected sarcoidosis. Using anatomical landmarks and computed tomography (CT) images, the TBNA needle is advanced "blindly" through the airway wall, and into the mediastinal lymph node. Because of the lack of real-time visual guidance, it is possible to miss the targeted lymph node as well as enter vascular structures with the needle system and cause bleeding.

A new method of performing TBNA has now been developed which uses real-time endobronchial ultrasonography to advance a 22 gauge needle into mediastinal lymph nodes under direct visualization (EBUS-TBNA). While this technique has been proven to be effective in the diagnosis and staging of lung malignancy, its sensitivity for the diagnosis of sarcoidosis is unclear given that larger biopsy samples are often required to make this diagnosis.

This study will aim to randomize patients with a clinical suspicion of sarcoidosis and mediastinal adenopathy undergoing bronchoscopy to TBNA vs. EBUS-TBNA in order to compare the sensitivity of these tests for sarcoidosis.

Being tested
Bronchoscopy
Keywords
Sarcoidosis, mediastinal adenopathy, bronchoscopy, Transbronchial needle aspiration, endobronchial ultrasonography
Medical subject headings
Sarcoidosis, Mediastinal Diseases

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • BronchoscopyProcedure or surgery

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Diagnostic yield

Secondary outcomes (4)
  1. Sensitivity and specificity for Sarcoidosis

  2. Complication rates

  3. Length of Procedure

  4. Dose of sedation required

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted8 Sep 2006 (estimated)
  2. Study startSep 2006
  3. Primary completionSep 2007
  4. Study completionAug 2008

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Diagnosis
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Single blind
Enrolment
50 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT00373555
Sponsor's protocol ID
E-20269
Status last verified
Aug 2008
First submitted
7 Sep 2006
Last updated
2 Oct 2008
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No

Publications

  • Tremblay A, Stather DR, MacEachern P, Khalil M, Field SK. A randomized controlled trial of standard vs endobronchial ultrasonography-guided transbronchial needle aspiration in patients with suspected sarcoidosis. Chest. 2009 Aug;136(2):340-346. doi: 10.1378/chest.08-2768. Epub 2009 Feb 2.

    PubMed 19188547

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Bronchoscopy in people with Sarcoidosis and Mediastinal Diseases, run by University of Calgary at 1 site in Canada.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 6 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 2 Oct 2008. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Canada. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Diagnostic yield. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT00373555, which also lists 1 linked publication.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 2 Oct 2008.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in