Cold Agglutinin DiseasePhase 2NCT00373594
Therapy for Chronic Cold Agglutinin Disease
A Phase 2 study testing Rituximab and Fludarabine in people with Cold Agglutinin Disease, run by University of Bergen at 6 sites in 2 countries.
Trial summary
Chronic cold agglutinin disease (CAD) is a type of autoimmune hemolytic anemia (anemia due to destruction of red blood cells by abnormal antibodies). Almost all patients also suffer from cold-induced disturbances of blood circulation. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 90 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Cold Agglutinin Disease
- What is being tested?
- Rituximab and Fludarabine
- How many people
- 30 participants
- Where
- 6 sitesin 2 countries
- Study dates
- Jun 2005to May 2010
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 90 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- CAD diagnosis defined by the combination of:
- Chronic haemolysis
- Cold agglutinin titre > 64
- Positive direct antiglobulin test when performed with polyspecific antiserum, negative (or only weakly positive) with anti-IgG, and strongly positive with anti-C3d
- The presence of a clonal B-cell lymphoproliferative disorder defined by:
- Monoclonal IgMκ band by serum electrophoresis and immunofixation, and
Show all 9Show fewer
- Lymphocyte phenotype with κ/λ-ratio > 3.5 and CD20+,κ+ co-expression, using flowcytometric immunophenotyping of bone marrow aspirates
- Clinical symptoms requiring treatment, such as anaemia or Raynaud-like symptoms
- Informed consent
Who cannot join
- An aggressive lymphoma
- Blood lymphocyte count > 50 . 109/L
- Non-lymphatic malignant disease other than basal cell carcinoma
- Contra-indications to rituximab or fludarabine therapy
- Inability to cooperate
Trial locations and contacts
6 sites in 2 countries.
6 sites in 2 countries
Norway5 sites
Haukeland University Hospital
Bergen
Haugesund Hospital
Haugesund
Ullevaal University Hospital
Oslo, 0407
Rikshospitalet-Radiumhospitalet University Hospital
Oslo
Sykehuset i Vestfold
Tønsberg
Russia1 site
BMT Clinic, St Petersburg Pavlov State Medical University
Saint Petersburg, 197089
About this study
Official title: Therapy for Chronic Cold Agglutinin Disease: A Prospective, Non-randomized International Multicentre Study on the Safety and Efficacy of Rituximab in Combination With Fludarabine.
Chronic cold agglutinin disease (CAD) is a type of autoimmune hemolytic anemia (anemia due to destruction of red blood cells by abnormal antibodies). Almost all patients also suffer from cold-induced disturbances of blood circulation. The purpose of this study is to assess the efficacy and safety of combination therapy with rituximab (an antibody against B lymphocytes) and fludarabine (a cytotoxic drug) for CAD. Another aim is to try to assess whether these agents in combination are better than single agent therapy with rituximab.
Read the detailed description
- Background
Chronic cold agglutinin disease (CAD) is mediated by monoclonal cold-reactive autoantibodies that bind to erythrocyte surface antigens, causing haemagglutination and complement-mediated haemolysis. Anaemia is severe (Hb 8.0 g/dL or lower) in one-third of patients and complement-induced exacerbation during febrile illness occurs frequently 1-3. Cold-induced circulatory symptoms are present in more than 90% of patients and may be disabling 1. CAD not associated with overt lymphoma or other disease has traditionally been classified as primary or idiopathic. However, a lymphoproliferative bone marrow disorder can be demonstrated by flow cytometry in 90% and by histology in approximately 75% of these patients, characterized by clonal proliferation of CD20+,κ+ B-cells 1,4,5. The histological features are those of lymphoplasmacytic lymphoma in about 50% of the patients 1.
Many standard therapies used in other autoimmune diseases or indolent lymphomas are inefficient, e.g. corticosteroids, alkylating agents, interferon-α and, probably, purine analogue single agent therapy 1,6-8. Treatment with the chimeric monoclonal anti-CD20 antibody rituximab has been shown in prospective studies to induce remission in more than half of patients 9,10. Almost all responses were partial, however, and the median response duration was less than one year. Further studies are warranted, therefore, in order to explore the possibilities for increasing the response rate and duration.
The purine analogues, cladribine and fludarabine, are not cyclus dependent, and they have yielded partial response rates of 30-75% and complete response rates of 3-10% in lymphoplasmacytic lymphoma 11,12. Although probably clinically inefficient as monotherapy in most CAD patients, clinical effect of fludarabine has been reported in a single case 13, and cladribine has been shown to induce tumour reduction even in this condition 8. In lymphoplasmacytic lymphoma, purine analogue and rituximab combination therapy has resulted in higher response rates and more prolonged remissions as compared to purine analogue single agent therapy 12. The combination has produced favourable results in some patients with the related condition cryoglobulinaemia type I 14. Fludarabine has induced autoimmune haemolytic anaemia in patients with chronic lymphocytic leukaemia, but such events have not been reported in CAD patients 13,15. Moreover, there are reasons to assume that rituximab therapy will further reduce the risk of this adverse effect of fludarabine 16.
2 Clinical study
The clinical study is a prospective, non-randomized multicentre study in order to investigate the efficacy and safety of rituximab and fludarabine combination therapy in patients with CAD. The protocol has approved by the Regional Medical Research Ethics Committee of Southern Norway, Norwegian Medicines Agency (EudraCT nr: 2004-002936-25), and Norwegian Social Science Data Services (Privacy Issue Unit).
2.1 Study objectives
The major study objective is to assess efficacy of rituximab and fludarabine in combination for patients with CAD.
The second objective is to assess safety of rituximab and fludarabine in combination for patients with CAD.
The third objective is to try to assess whether rituximab and fludarabine in combination are superior to rituximab monotherapy comparing patients who have received both therapies for CAD.
2.2 Study design
A prospective, non-randomized international multicentre study.
Registration
Treatment:
Day 1: Rituximab; 375 mg/m2 Day 1-5: Fludarabine orally; 40 mg/m2
Day 28: Rituximab; 375 mg/m2 Day 28-33: Fludarabine orally; 40 mg/m2
Day 56: Rituximab; 375 mg/m2 Day 56-60: Fludarabine orally; 40 mg/m2
Day 84: Rituximab; 375 mg/m2 Day 84-88: Fludarabine orally; 40 mg/m2
Evaluation
2.3 Dose adjustments
Doses of fludarabine will be adjusted in case of haematological toxicity or renal insufficiency. For details, see chapter 4.3.
2.4 Study population
2.4.1 Inclusion criteria
- CAD diagnosis defined by the combination of -
- Chronic haemolysis
- Cold agglutinin titre > 64
- Positive direct antiglobulin test when performed with polyspecific antiserum, negative (or only weakly positive) with anti-IgG, and strongly positive with anti-C3d
- The presence of a clonal B-cell lymphoproliferative disorder defined by -
- Monoclonal IgMκ band by serum electrophoresis and immunofixation, and
- Lymphocyte phenotype with κ/λ-ratio > 3.5 and CD20+,κ+ co-expression, using flowcytometric immunophenotyping of bone marrow aspirates
- Clinical symptoms requiring treatment, such as anaemia or Raynaud-like symptoms
- Informed consent
2.4.2 Exclusion criteria
- An aggressive lymphoma
- Blood lymphocyte count > 50 . 109/L
- Non-lymphatic malignant disease other than basal cell carcinoma
- Contra-indications to rituximab or fludarabine therapy
- Inability to cooperate
2.5. Response criteria
Responses will be assessed using the following, previously published definitions 8,9,17:
Complete response (CR), Absence of anemia, no signs of hemolysis, no clinical symptoms of CAD, undetectable serum monoclonal protein, and no signs of clonal lymphoproliferation by bone marrow histology, immunohistochemistry and flow cytometry.
Partial response (PR), Stable increase in Hb levels by at least 2.0 g/dL or to the normal range, combined with a reduction of serum IgM concentrations by at least 50% or to the normal range, improvement of clinical symptoms, and transfusion independency.
Non-response (NR), Patients not meeting the criteria for CR or PR.
3 Patient examination at inclusion
3.1 History. Clinical and radiological examination
Year of first occurrence of clinical symptoms is registered along with data on haemolytic anaemia, circulatory symptoms, cold- or fever-induced exacerbation, previous therapies, lymph node enlargement, and spleen size (clinical assessment). Chest radiograph and abdominal ultrasonography should be done if not performed already during the last four months.
3.2 Blood tests
Haemolysis is detected and quantified based on Hb, reticulocyte count (x 109/L), LDH, bilirubin and haptoglobin. These measurements should be done twice during the last two months before treatment.
The following haematological, biochemical and immunological assessments should be done once at inclusion:
- WBC, leukocyte differential count, platelet count
- Iron, transferrin (or TIBC), ferritin, cobalamine and folate
- CRP
- Quantification of IgM, IgG and IgA
- Serum electrophoreses with immunofixation (*) (Immunofixation must be performed even if visual assessment of agarose electrophoreses does not show any monoclonal band.)
- Cold agglutinin titre (*)
- Specific direct antiglobulin test (DAT, direct Coombs' test), i.e. using polyspecific antiserum, anti-C3d and anti-IgG)
- Complement assessments (C3, C4 and CH50) (*, **)
- CMV and VZV antibodies
- Freezing of 5 ml serum (*, **)
- Freezing of 5 ml EDTA-blood for possible later DNA-based studies (**)
Remarks:See protocol text.
3.3 Bone marrow examinations
Centres outside Norway should follow the guidelines listed below. Norwegian centres should refer to the Norwegian protocol version.
I.) Morphologic assessment of bone marrow aspirate is performed according to the routines of the participating centre.
II.) A bone marrow trephine biopsy should be obtained according to the routines of the department. Morphological and immunohistochemical assessments are to be done at a university pathology laboratory by an experienced haematopathologist. If possible, a fresh biopsy specimen should be preferred.
III.) Flow-cytometric immunophenotyping of bone marrow aspirate should be done at a university hospital laboratory. Cells should be washed at 37oC in order to remove cold agglutinins, using the previously published procedure 5 (Appendix 1) or an equally satisfactory method. The antibody panel should comprise CD19, CD20, CD5, kappa, lambda and preferably also IgM and IgG. The kappa/lambda ratio should be calculated. CD20 expression is registered semi-quantitatively as 0, + or ++.
IV.) If possible, 5 ml bone marrow aspirate should be frozen at -70oC for the purpose of later DNA-based examinations.
4 Therapy
4.1 Treatment schedule
Day 1: Rituximab; 375 mg/m2 Day 1-5: Fludarabine orally; 40 mg/m2
Day 28: Rituximab; 375 mg/m2 Day 28-33: Fludarabine orally; 40 mg/m2
Day 56: Rituximab; 375 mg/m2 Day 56-60: Fludarabine orally; 40 mg/m2
Day 84: Rituximab; 375 mg/m2 Day 84-88: Fludarabine orally; 40 mg/m2
4.2 Administration and precautions
Administration and monitoring of rituximab and fludarabine therapy should be in accordance with the manufacturers' recommendations, the official regulations that apply in the participating country, and the routine procedures of the participating unit.
4.3 Dose adjustments
4.3.1 Haematological toxicity If ANC<1,0x109/L and/or platelets<75x109/L at day 1 of any cycle treatment should be delayed for up to 2 weeks and fludarabine dose should be reduced to 30 mg/m2 in the remaining cycles. Myelosuppression of the same degree in the subsequent cycles should result in a reduction of the fludarabine dose to 20 mg/m2.
Adjustments of the rituximab dose should not be done due to myelosuppression.
4.3.2 Renal insufficiency In patients with a creatinine clearance between 30-60 ml/min the fludarabine dose should be reduced to 20 mg/m2. Patients with a creatinine clearance below 30 ml/min are not eligible for the study.
5 Evaluation
5.1 Follow-up during treatment
The parameters listed below must be recorded before each therapy cycle:
Clinical condition, possible adverse effects, need for transfusion, Hb, reticulocytes count, WBC including differential count, platelet count, CRP, LDH, ASAT, ALAT, alkaline phosphatase, urea, creatinine, bilirubin and haptoglobin.
Any adverse effects of fludarabine are registered in CRF 2 (Appendix 3). Any adverse effects of rituximab are registered in CRF 3 (Appendix 4). In case of death or other serious events, these should be reported without delay to S. Berentsen or G. Tjønnfjord as well as the relevant national authorities according to regulations that apply in the participating country.
5.2 Follow-up after treatment (first six months)
A.) The following measurements must be done monthly during the first six months after the last cycle of therapy:
I.) All measurements listed in Paragraph 5.1. II.) Quantification of immunoglobulin classes. In case of reduction of a previously elevated IgM level to the normal range, serum electrophoresis with immunofixation should be performed at the next visit.
III.) Number of blood transfusions after the previous registration.
B.) At the first visit after cessation of therapy, a new bone marrow biopsy is performed in those patients where histological or immunohistochemical signs of a lymphoproliferative disorder were present at baseline. If a lymphoproliferative bone marrow involvement could be detected at baseline by flow cytometry only, flow-cytometric immunophenotyping is also repeated at this visit.
C.) Bone marrow examinations should also be repeated four months after the last therapy cycle if the examinations three months before showed signs of lymphoma.
5.3 Long-term follow-up
When more than six months have passed since cessation of treatment, patients should be followed every third month for three years or until they need treatment again.
- Conditions
- Cold Agglutinin Disease
- Being tested
- Rituximab, Fludarabine
- Keywords
- Cold agglutinin disease, Hemolytic, Anemia, Lymphoproliferative disease, Monoclonal antibodies, Rituximab, Fludarabine
- Medical subject headings
- Anemia, Hemolytic, Autoimmune, Hemolysis, Anemia, Lymphoproliferative Disorders
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
RituximabDrug
FludarabineDrug
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Hemoglobin level
Hemolysis
Circulatory symptoms
Serum monoclonal immunoglobulin level
Changes in bone marrow histology
Adverse effects
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted8 Sep 2006 (estimated)
- Study startJun 2005
- Primary completionApr 2010
- Study completionMay 2010
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (2)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Cold Agglutinin DiseaseStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Non-randomised
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 30 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- University of Bergen
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Investigators
- Sigbjorn Berentsen, MD, PhD, Study chair, Haugesund Hospital and University of BergenGeir E Tjonnfjord, MD, PhD, Study chair, Rikshospitalet-Radiumhospitalet University Hospital, OsloElling Ulvestad, MD, PhD, Study chair, The Gade Institute, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00373594
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 911238
- Status last verified
- Jun 2010
- First submitted
- 7 Sep 2006
- Last updated
- 22 Jun 2010
- Results posted
- No
Publications
1. Berentsen S, Ulvestad E, Langholm R, Beiske K, Hjorth-Hansen H, Ghanima W et al. Primary chronic cold agglutinin disease: a population based clinical study of 86 patients. Haematologica 2006;91:460-6. 2. Ulvestad E, Berentsen S, Bo K, Shammas FV. Clinical immunology of chronic cold agglutinin disease. Eur J Haematol 1999;63:259-66. 3. Ulvestad E, Berentsen S, Mollnes TE. Acute phase haemolysis in chronic cold agglutinin disease. Scand J Immunol 2001;54:239-42. 4.Berentsen S, Ulvestad E, Gjertsen BT, Hjorth-Hansen H, Langholm R, Knutsen H et al. Rituximab for primary chronic cold agglutinin disease: a prospective study of 37 courses of therapy in 27 patients. Blood 2004;103:2925-8.
Berentsen S, Randen U, Vagan AM, Hjorth-Hansen H, Vik A, Dalgaard J, Jacobsen EM, Thoresen AS, Beiske K, Tjonnfjord GE. High response rate and durable remissions following fludarabine and rituximab combination therapy for chronic cold agglutinin disease. Blood. 2010 Oct 28;116(17):3180-4. doi: 10.1182/blood-2010-06-288647. Epub 2010 Jul 15.
PubMed 20634373
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 22 Jun 2010. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Therapy for Chronic Cold Agglutinin Disease: A Prospective, Non-randomized International Multicentre Study on the Safety and Efficacy of Rituximab in Combination With Fludarabine.
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00373594
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 911238
- Conditions
- Cold Agglutinin Disease
- Keywords
- Cold agglutinin disease, Hemolytic, Anemia, Lymphoproliferative disease, Monoclonal antibodies, Rituximab, Fludarabine
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 30 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- University of BergenUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- Jun 2005
- Primary completion
- Apr 2010 (actual)
- Study completion
- May 2010 (actual)
- First posted
- 8 Sep 2006 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Chronic cold agglutinin disease (CAD) is a type of autoimmune hemolytic anemia (anemia due to destruction of red blood cells by abnormal antibodies). Almost all patients also suffer from cold-induced disturbances of blood circulation. The purpose of this study is to assess the efficacy and safety of combination therapy with rituximab (an antibody against B lymphocytes) and fludarabine (a cytotoxic drug) for CAD. Another aim is to try to assess whether these agents in combination are better than single agent therapy with rituximab.
Detailed description
- Background
Chronic cold agglutinin disease (CAD) is mediated by monoclonal cold-reactive autoantibodies that bind to erythrocyte surface antigens, causing haemagglutination and complement-mediated haemolysis. Anaemia is severe (Hb 8.0 g/dL or lower) in one-third of patients and complement-induced exacerbation during febrile illness occurs frequently 1-3. Cold-induced circulatory symptoms are present in more than 90% of patients and may be disabling 1. CAD not associated with overt lymphoma or other disease has traditionally been classified as primary or idiopathic. However, a lymphoproliferative bone marrow disorder can be demonstrated by flow cytometry in 90% and by histology in approximately 75% of these patients, characterized by clonal proliferation of CD20+,κ+ B-cells 1,4,5. The histological features are those of lymphoplasmacytic lymphoma in about 50% of the patients 1.
Many standard therapies used in other autoimmune diseases or indolent lymphomas are inefficient, e.g. corticosteroids, alkylating agents, interferon-α and, probably, purine analogue single agent therapy 1,6-8. Treatment with the chimeric monoclonal anti-CD20 antibody rituximab has been shown in prospective studies to induce remission in more than half of patients 9,10. Almost all responses were partial, however, and the median response duration was less than one year. Further studies are warranted, therefore, in order to explore the possibilities for increasing the response rate and duration.
The purine analogues, cladribine and fludarabine, are not cyclus dependent, and they have yielded partial response rates of 30-75% and complete response rates of 3-10% in lymphoplasmacytic lymphoma 11,12. Although probably clinically inefficient as monotherapy in most CAD patients, clinical effect of fludarabine has been reported in a single case 13, and cladribine has been shown to induce tumour reduction even in this condition 8. In lymphoplasmacytic lymphoma, purine analogue and rituximab combination therapy has resulted in higher response rates and more prolonged remissions as compared to purine analogue single agent therapy 12. The combination has produced favourable results in some patients with the related condition cryoglobulinaemia type I 14. Fludarabine has induced autoimmune haemolytic anaemia in patients with chronic lymphocytic leukaemia, but such events have not been reported in CAD patients 13,15. Moreover, there are reasons to assume that rituximab therapy will further reduce the risk of this adverse effect of fludarabine 16.
2 Clinical study
The clinical study is a prospective, non-randomized multicentre study in order to investigate the efficacy and safety of rituximab and fludarabine combination therapy in patients with CAD. The protocol has approved by the Regional Medical Research Ethics Committee of Southern Norway, Norwegian Medicines Agency (EudraCT nr: 2004-002936-25), and Norwegian Social Science Data Services (Privacy Issue Unit).
2.1 Study objectives
The major study objective is to assess efficacy of rituximab and fludarabine in combination for patients with CAD.
The second objective is to assess safety of rituximab and fludarabine in combination for patients with CAD.
The third objective is to try to assess whether rituximab and fludarabine in combination are superior to rituximab monotherapy comparing patients who have received both therapies for CAD.
2.2 Study design
A prospective, non-randomized international multicentre study.
Registration
Treatment:
Day 1: Rituximab; 375 mg/m2 Day 1-5: Fludarabine orally; 40 mg/m2
Day 28: Rituximab; 375 mg/m2 Day 28-33: Fludarabine orally; 40 mg/m2
Day 56: Rituximab; 375 mg/m2 Day 56-60: Fludarabine orally; 40 mg/m2
Day 84: Rituximab; 375 mg/m2 Day 84-88: Fludarabine orally; 40 mg/m2
Evaluation
2.3 Dose adjustments
Doses of fludarabine will be adjusted in case of haematological toxicity or renal insufficiency. For details, see chapter 4.3.
2.4 Study population
2.4.1 Inclusion criteria
- CAD diagnosis defined by the combination of -
- Chronic haemolysis
- Cold agglutinin titre > 64
- Positive direct antiglobulin test when performed with polyspecific antiserum, negative (or only weakly positive) with anti-IgG, and strongly positive with anti-C3d
- The presence of a clonal B-cell lymphoproliferative disorder defined by -
- Monoclonal IgMκ band by serum electrophoresis and immunofixation, and
- Lymphocyte phenotype with κ/λ-ratio > 3.5 and CD20+,κ+ co-expression, using flowcytometric immunophenotyping of bone marrow aspirates
- Clinical symptoms requiring treatment, such as anaemia or Raynaud-like symptoms
- Informed consent
2.4.2 Exclusion criteria
- An aggressive lymphoma
- Blood lymphocyte count > 50 . 109/L
- Non-lymphatic malignant disease other than basal cell carcinoma
- Contra-indications to rituximab or fludarabine therapy
- Inability to cooperate
2.5. Response criteria
Responses will be assessed using the following, previously published definitions 8,9,17:
Complete response (CR), Absence of anemia, no signs of hemolysis, no clinical symptoms of CAD, undetectable serum monoclonal protein, and no signs of clonal lymphoproliferation by bone marrow histology, immunohistochemistry and flow cytometry.
Partial response (PR), Stable increase in Hb levels by at least 2.0 g/dL or to the normal range, combined with a reduction of serum IgM concentrations by at least 50% or to the normal range, improvement of clinical symptoms, and transfusion independency.
Non-response (NR), Patients not meeting the criteria for CR or PR.
3 Patient examination at inclusion
3.1 History. Clinical and radiological examination
Year of first occurrence of clinical symptoms is registered along with data on haemolytic anaemia, circulatory symptoms, cold- or fever-induced exacerbation, previous therapies, lymph node enlargement, and spleen size (clinical assessment). Chest radiograph and abdominal ultrasonography should be done if not performed already during the last four months.
3.2 Blood tests
Haemolysis is detected and quantified based on Hb, reticulocyte count (x 109/L), LDH, bilirubin and haptoglobin. These measurements should be done twice during the last two months before treatment.
The following haematological, biochemical and immunological assessments should be done once at inclusion:
- WBC, leukocyte differential count, platelet count
- Iron, transferrin (or TIBC), ferritin, cobalamine and folate
- CRP
- Quantification of IgM, IgG and IgA
- Serum electrophoreses with immunofixation (*) (Immunofixation must be performed even if visual assessment of agarose electrophoreses does not show any monoclonal band.)
- Cold agglutinin titre (*)
- Specific direct antiglobulin test (DAT, direct Coombs' test), i.e. using polyspecific antiserum, anti-C3d and anti-IgG)
- Complement assessments (C3, C4 and CH50) (*, **)
- CMV and VZV antibodies
- Freezing of 5 ml serum (*, **)
- Freezing of 5 ml EDTA-blood for possible later DNA-based studies (**)
Remarks:See protocol text.
3.3 Bone marrow examinations
Centres outside Norway should follow the guidelines listed below. Norwegian centres should refer to the Norwegian protocol version.
I.) Morphologic assessment of bone marrow aspirate is performed according to the routines of the participating centre.
II.) A bone marrow trephine biopsy should be obtained according to the routines of the department. Morphological and immunohistochemical assessments are to be done at a university pathology laboratory by an experienced haematopathologist. If possible, a fresh biopsy specimen should be preferred.
III.) Flow-cytometric immunophenotyping of bone marrow aspirate should be done at a university hospital laboratory. Cells should be washed at 37oC in order to remove cold agglutinins, using the previously published procedure 5 (Appendix 1) or an equally satisfactory method. The antibody panel should comprise CD19, CD20, CD5, kappa, lambda and preferably also IgM and IgG. The kappa/lambda ratio should be calculated. CD20 expression is registered semi-quantitatively as 0, + or ++.
IV.) If possible, 5 ml bone marrow aspirate should be frozen at -70oC for the purpose of later DNA-based examinations.
4 Therapy
4.1 Treatment schedule
Day 1: Rituximab; 375 mg/m2 Day 1-5: Fludarabine orally; 40 mg/m2
Day 28: Rituximab; 375 mg/m2 Day 28-33: Fludarabine orally; 40 mg/m2
Day 56: Rituximab; 375 mg/m2 Day 56-60: Fludarabine orally; 40 mg/m2
Day 84: Rituximab; 375 mg/m2 Day 84-88: Fludarabine orally; 40 mg/m2
4.2 Administration and precautions
Administration and monitoring of rituximab and fludarabine therapy should be in accordance with the manufacturers' recommendations, the official regulations that apply in the participating country, and the routine procedures of the participating unit.
4.3 Dose adjustments
4.3.1 Haematological toxicity If ANC<1,0x109/L and/or platelets<75x109/L at day 1 of any cycle treatment should be delayed for up to 2 weeks and fludarabine dose should be reduced to 30 mg/m2 in the remaining cycles. Myelosuppression of the same degree in the subsequent cycles should result in a reduction of the fludarabine dose to 20 mg/m2.
Adjustments of the rituximab dose should not be done due to myelosuppression.
4.3.2 Renal insufficiency In patients with a creatinine clearance between 30-60 ml/min the fludarabine dose should be reduced to 20 mg/m2. Patients with a creatinine clearance below 30 ml/min are not eligible for the study.
5 Evaluation
5.1 Follow-up during treatment
The parameters listed below must be recorded before each therapy cycle:
Clinical condition, possible adverse effects, need for transfusion, Hb, reticulocytes count, WBC including differential count, platelet count, CRP, LDH, ASAT, ALAT, alkaline phosphatase, urea, creatinine, bilirubin and haptoglobin.
Any adverse effects of fludarabine are registered in CRF 2 (Appendix 3). Any adverse effects of rituximab are registered in CRF 3 (Appendix 4). In case of death or other serious events, these should be reported without delay to S. Berentsen or G. Tjønnfjord as well as the relevant national authorities according to regulations that apply in the participating country.
5.2 Follow-up after treatment (first six months)
A.) The following measurements must be done monthly during the first six months after the last cycle of therapy:
I.) All measurements listed in Paragraph 5.1. II.) Quantification of immunoglobulin classes. In case of reduction of a previously elevated IgM level to the normal range, serum electrophoresis with immunofixation should be performed at the next visit.
III.) Number of blood transfusions after the previous registration.
B.) At the first visit after cessation of therapy, a new bone marrow biopsy is performed in those patients where histological or immunohistochemical signs of a lymphoproliferative disorder were present at baseline. If a lymphoproliferative bone marrow involvement could be detected at baseline by flow cytometry only, flow-cytometric immunophenotyping is also repeated at this visit.
C.) Bone marrow examinations should also be repeated four months after the last therapy cycle if the examinations three months before showed signs of lymphoma.
5.3 Long-term follow-up
When more than six months have passed since cessation of treatment, patients should be followed every third month for three years or until they need treatment again.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Non-randomised
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 90 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (9 listed)
- CAD diagnosis defined by the combination of:
- The presence of a clonal B-cell lymphoproliferative disorder defined by:
- Clinical symptoms requiring treatment, such as anaemia or Raynaud-like symptoms
- Informed consent
Key exclusion criteria (5 listed)
- An aggressive lymphoma
- Blood lymphocyte count > 50 . 109/L
- Non-lymphatic malignant disease other than basal cell carcinoma
- Contra-indications to rituximab or fludarabine therapy
- Inability to cooperate
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Rituximab | Drug | – |
| Fludarabine | Drug | – |
Primary outcome
Hemoglobin level
Hemolysis
Circulatory symptoms
Serum monoclonal immunoglobulin level
Changes in bone marrow histology
Adverse effects
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 22 Jun 2010.
- Background1. Berentsen S, Ulvestad E, Langholm R, Beiske K, Hjorth-Hansen H, Ghanima W et al. Primary chronic cold agglutinin disease: a population based clinical study of 86 patients. Haematologica 2006;91:460-6. 2. Ulvestad E, Berentsen S, Bo K, Shammas FV. Clinical immunology of chronic cold agglutinin disease. Eur J Haematol 1999;63:259-66. 3. Ulvestad E, Berentsen S, Mollnes TE. Acute phase haemolysis in chronic cold agglutinin disease. Scand J Immunol 2001;54:239-42. 4.Berentsen S, Ulvestad E, Gjertsen BT, Hjorth-Hansen H, Langholm R, Knutsen H et al. Rituximab for primary chronic cold agglutinin disease: a prospective study of 37 courses of therapy in 27 patients. Blood 2004;103:2925-8.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 20634373Berentsen S, Randen U, Vagan AM, Hjorth-Hansen H, Vik A, Dalgaard J, Jacobsen EM, Thoresen AS, Beiske K, Tjonnfjord GE. High response rate and durable remissions following fludarabine and rituximab combination therapy for chronic cold agglutinin disease. Blood. 2010 Oct 28;116(17):3180-4. doi: 10.1182/blood-2010-06-288647. Epub 2010 Jul 15.
Related trials for Cold Agglutinin Disease
RecruitingPhase 1
OM336 in Autoimmune Cytopenias
AIHA - Warm Autoimmune Hemolytic Anemia, AIHA - Cold Autoimmune Hemolytic Anemia
Active, not recruitingObservational study
Cold Agglutinin Disease Real World Evidence Registry
Cold Agglutinin Disease (CAD), Cold Agglutinin Syndrome (CAS)
RecruitingPhase 1
Safety, Tolerability, Pharmacokinetic, and Pharmacodynamic Study in Healthy Male and Female Subjects and Safety, Tolerability, Pharmacokinetics, and Pilot Efficacy Biomarkers in Subjects With Cold Agglutinin Disease
First in Man Study to Evaluate Initial Safety
Active, not recruitingPhase 2
Zanubrutinib in Primary Cold Agglutinin Disease
Lymphoma
Not yet recruitingPhase 1
Inaticabtagene Autoleucel Injection in the Treatment of Autoimmune Hemolytic Anemia After Three or More Lines of Therapy
AIHA - Cold Autoimmune Hemolytic Anemia
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Sigbjorn Berentsen, MD, PhD study chair
Haugesund Hospital and University of Bergen
Geir E Tjonnfjord, MD, PhD study chair
Rikshospitalet-Radiumhospitalet University Hospital, Oslo
Elling Ulvestad, MD, PhD study chair
The Gade Institute, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen
6 sites in 2 countries: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 2 study testing Rituximab and Fludarabine in people with Cold Agglutinin Disease, run by University of Bergen at 6 sites in 2 countries.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 9 inclusion and 5 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 22 Jun 2010. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 6 sites in Norway, Russia. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Hemoglobin level. The study lists 6 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT00373594, which also lists 2 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 22 Jun 2010.