Malaria, FalciparumPhase 4NCT00374205
Randomized Trial on Effectiveness of ACTs in Ghana
A Phase 4 study testing Artesunate plus Amodiaquine and Artemether-Lumefantrine in people with Malaria, Falciparum, run by Bernhard Nocht Institute for Tropical Medicine at 1 site in Ghana.
Trial summary
The purpose of this study is to compare the effectiveness and safety of two Artemisinin Combination Therapies (ACTs) for the treatment of children with uncomplicated Plasmodium falciparum malaria Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 6 to 59 months
- Conditions the study is for
- Malaria, Falciparum
- What is being tested?
- Artesunate plus Amodiaquine and Artemether-Lumefantrine
- Type of treatment
- Pill or oral medicine
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 245 participants
- Where
- 1 siteGhana
- Study dates
- Sep 2006to Oct 2007
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 6 to 59 months
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Child
Who may be able to join
- Male and female outpatients aged 6 months to 59 months
- Absence of severe malnutrition
- A slide-confirmed P. falciparum asexual parasitaemia between 2,000/µl and 200,000/µl
- A measured axillary temperature ≥ 37.5 °C or rectal/tympanic temperature ≥ 38.0 °C
- Absence of general danger signs (unable to drink; repeated vomiting; recent history of convulsions; lethargic or unconscious state; unable to stand up or to sit)
- Ability to tolerate oral therapy
- Permanent residence in study area
- Informed consent by the legal representative of the subject, if possible, the parents
Who cannot join
- Adequate anti-malarial treatment within the previous 7 days
- Antibiotic treatment for a current infection
- Previous participation in a clinical trial
- Haemoglobin < 5 g/dl
- Leucocyte count: > 15000/µl
- Mixed plasmodial infection
Show all 9Show fewer
- Severe malaria as defined by WHO recommendations
- Any other severe underlying disease (cardiac, renal, hepatic diseases, malnutrition, known HIV infection) or concomitant disease masking assessment of response
- History of allergy or intolerance against trial medication
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
Official title: A Comparative Assessment of the Effectiveness of Artemether Plus Lumefantrine Versus Artesunate Plus Amodiaquine for the Treatment of Children With Uncomplicated Plasmodium Falciparum Malaria
The purpose of this study is to compare the effectiveness and safety of two Artemisinin Combination Therapies (ACTs) for the treatment of children with uncomplicated Plasmodium falciparum malaria
Read the detailed description
Childhood mortality related to Plasmodium falciparum malaria is on the rise with more than 1 million deaths per year in Sub-Saharan Africa. In the context of growing drug-resistance to antimalarials health officials are calling for rapid replacement of failing drugs by combining antimalarial drugs. Artemisinin Combination Antimalarial Therapies (ACTs) are in the focus of malaria control programmes and are recommended for first-line treatment in African countries. ACTs have been reported to be highly effective as artemisinin derivatives cause a rapid and substantial decrease in the parasite load when used for treating patients with malaria and resistance to artemisinin is still lacking. However, the short half-lives of artemisinins result in frequent recrudescent infections when used alone and therefore, much interest lays on the choice of the combination partner drug. ACTs also have been proposed as a means of reducing transmission by the reduction of gametocytes and of delaying the spread of drug resistance and prolonging the therapeutic life span of. Nevertheless, drug resistance of parasites to the respective partner drug is a matter of concern. Artesunate-amodiaquine (AQ) and artemether-lumefantrine (AL) are two registered fixed-dose artemisinin combination chemotherapies used in Africa which are GMP-manufactured at industrial scale. There is still limited data from randomised, controlled trials to support the general effectiveness of these two ACTs in Africa, including Ghana. More data is needed to compare these two therapies to make evidence-based first-line treatment decisions. Importantly, it is difficult to predict how combination therapy may affect the spread of drug resistance and monitoring drug resistance markers should be embedded in these trials to guide drug policy decision.
The aim of this open-labelled, randomised drug trial is to compare the effectiveness and safety of artesunate-amodiaquine (Arsucam®) against artemether plus lumefantrine (Coartem®) for the treatment of children under five years of age with uncomplicated Plasmodium falciparum malaria.
- Conditions
- Malaria, Falciparum
- Being tested
- Artesunate plus Amodiaquine, Artemether-Lumefantrine
- Keywords
- Ghana, Effectiveness, Safety, Drug-Resistance, ACT, Coartem, Arsucam
- Medical subject headings
- Malaria, Falciparum
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Artesunate plus AmodiaquineDrug
Also called Arsucam®
Artesunate 50 mg and Amodiaquine 153 mg co-blister tablets: 3 days once daily weight-adjusted dosing according to manufacturer
Artemether-LumefantrineDrug
Also called Coartem®
Artemether 20 mg/Lumefantrine 120mg fixe-dose-combination tablets: 3 days twice daily weight-adjusted dosing according to manufacturer
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| AL | Experimental | Artemether plus Lumefantrine 6 dose 3 days treatment Receives: Drug: Artemether-Lumefantrine |
| ASAQ | Active comparator | Artesunate plus Amodiaquine Receives: Drug: Artesunate plus Amodiaquine |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Clinical and PCR-controlled parasitological cure rate at day 28
Measured: 28 days
Secondary outcomes (7)
Clinical and PCR-controlled parasitological cure rate at day 14
Measured: 14 days
Effect on anaemia
Measured: 28 days
Molecular Drug Resistance Markers
Measured: 28 days
Recrudescence and Reinfection
Measured: 28 days
Effects on Gametocytemia
Measured: 28 days
Acceptance of Therapies
Measured: 7 days
Incidences of malaria episodes over a follow-up period of 1 year
Measured: 12 months
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted11 Sep 2006 (estimated)
- Study startSep 2006
- Study completionOct 2007
Why it stopped: Interim analysis showed more LCFs in one of the treatment arms
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (6)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Malaria, FalciparumStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 245 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Bernhard Nocht Institute for Tropical Medicine
- Sponsor type
- Other government
- Collaborators
- Presbyterian Health Service (PHS), Kumasi Centre for Collaborative Research (KCCR), School of Medical Sciences Kumasi (SMS/KNUST)
- Investigators
- Daniel Ansong, MD, Principal investigator, School of Medical Science (SMS), Kwame Nkrumah University of Science and Technology (KNUST), Kumasi, Ghana
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00374205
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 01KA22062006
- Status last verified
- Nov 2007
- First submitted
- 8 Sep 2006
- Last updated
- 27 Nov 2007
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
Publications
Bukirwa H, Yeka A, Kamya MR, Talisuna A, Banek K, Bakyaita N, Rwakimari JB, Rosenthal PJ, Wabwire-Mangen F, Dorsey G, Staedke SG. Artemisinin combination therapies for treatment of uncomplicated malaria in Uganda. PLoS Clin Trials. 2006 May;1(1):e7. doi: 10.1371/journal.pctr.0010007. Epub 2006 May 19.
PubMed 16871329Mutabingwa TK, Anthony D, Heller A, Hallett R, Ahmed J, Drakeley C, Greenwood BM, Whitty CJ. Amodiaquine alone, amodiaquine+sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine, amodiaquine+artesunate, and artemether-lumefantrine for outpatient treatment of malaria in Tanzanian children: a four-arm randomised effectiveness trial. Lancet. 2005 Apr 23-29;365(9469):1474-80. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(05)66417-3.
PubMed 15850631Makanga M, Premji Z, Falade C, Karbwang J, Mueller EA, Andriano K, Hunt P, De Palacios PI. Efficacy and safety of the six-dose regimen of artemether-lumefantrine in pediatrics with uncomplicated Plasmodium falciparum malaria: a pooled analysis of individual patient data. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2006 Jun;74(6):991-8.
PubMed 16760509Price RN, Uhlemann AC, van Vugt M, Brockman A, Hutagalung R, Nair S, Nash D, Singhasivanon P, Anderson TJ, Krishna S, White NJ, Nosten F. Molecular and pharmacological determinants of the therapeutic response to artemether-lumefantrine in multidrug-resistant Plasmodium falciparum malaria. Clin Infect Dis. 2006 Jun 1;42(11):1570-7. doi: 10.1086/503423. Epub 2006 Apr 26.
PubMed 16652314Martensson A, Stromberg J, Sisowath C, Msellem MI, Gil JP, Montgomery SM, Olliaro P, Ali AS, Bjorkman A. Efficacy of artesunate plus amodiaquine versus that of artemether-lumefantrine for the treatment of uncomplicated childhood Plasmodium falciparum malaria in Zanzibar, Tanzania. Clin Infect Dis. 2005 Oct 15;41(8):1079-86. doi: 10.1086/444460. Epub 2005 Sep 13.
PubMed 16163624Sidhu AB, Uhlemann AC, Valderramos SG, Valderramos JC, Krishna S, Fidock DA. Decreasing pfmdr1 copy number in plasmodium falciparum malaria heightens susceptibility to mefloquine, lumefantrine, halofantrine, quinine, and artemisinin. J Infect Dis. 2006 Aug 15;194(4):528-35. doi: 10.1086/507115. Epub 2006 Jul 11.
PubMed 16845638
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 27 Nov 2007. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- A Comparative Assessment of the Effectiveness of Artemether Plus Lumefantrine Versus Artesunate Plus Amodiaquine for the Treatment of Children With Uncomplicated Plasmodium Falciparum Malaria
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00374205
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 01KA22062006
- Conditions
- Malaria, Falciparum
- Keywords
- Ghana, Effectiveness, Safety, Drug-Resistance, ACT, Coartem, Arsucam
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- TerminatedReason stopped: Interim analysis showed more LCFs in one of the treatment arms
- Enrolment
- 245 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Bernhard Nocht Institute for Tropical MedicineOther government
- Collaborators
- Presbyterian Health Service (PHS), Kumasi Centre for Collaborative Research (KCCR), School of Medical Sciences Kumasi (SMS/KNUST)
- Study start
- Sep 2006
- Study completion
- Oct 2007 (actual)
- First posted
- 11 Sep 2006 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The purpose of this study is to compare the effectiveness and safety of two Artemisinin Combination Therapies (ACTs) for the treatment of children with uncomplicated Plasmodium falciparum malaria
Detailed description
Childhood mortality related to Plasmodium falciparum malaria is on the rise with more than 1 million deaths per year in Sub-Saharan Africa. In the context of growing drug-resistance to antimalarials health officials are calling for rapid replacement of failing drugs by combining antimalarial drugs. Artemisinin Combination Antimalarial Therapies (ACTs) are in the focus of malaria control programmes and are recommended for first-line treatment in African countries. ACTs have been reported to be highly effective as artemisinin derivatives cause a rapid and substantial decrease in the parasite load when used for treating patients with malaria and resistance to artemisinin is still lacking. However, the short half-lives of artemisinins result in frequent recrudescent infections when used alone and therefore, much interest lays on the choice of the combination partner drug. ACTs also have been proposed as a means of reducing transmission by the reduction of gametocytes and of delaying the spread of drug resistance and prolonging the therapeutic life span of. Nevertheless, drug resistance of parasites to the respective partner drug is a matter of concern. Artesunate-amodiaquine (AQ) and artemether-lumefantrine (AL) are two registered fixed-dose artemisinin combination chemotherapies used in Africa which are GMP-manufactured at industrial scale. There is still limited data from randomised, controlled trials to support the general effectiveness of these two ACTs in Africa, including Ghana. More data is needed to compare these two therapies to make evidence-based first-line treatment decisions. Importantly, it is difficult to predict how combination therapy may affect the spread of drug resistance and monitoring drug resistance markers should be embedded in these trials to guide drug policy decision.
The aim of this open-labelled, randomised drug trial is to compare the effectiveness and safety of artesunate-amodiaquine (Arsucam®) against artemether plus lumefantrine (Coartem®) for the treatment of children under five years of age with uncomplicated Plasmodium falciparum malaria.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| AL | Experimental | Drug: Artemether-LumefantrineArtemether plus Lumefantrine 6 dose 3 days treatment |
| ASAQ | Active comparator | Drug: Artesunate plus AmodiaquineArtesunate plus Amodiaquine |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 6 to 59 months
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Child
Key inclusion criteria (8 listed)
- Male and female outpatients aged 6 months to 59 months
- Absence of severe malnutrition
- A slide-confirmed P. falciparum asexual parasitaemia between 2,000/µl and 200,000/µl
- A measured axillary temperature ≥ 37.5 °C or rectal/tympanic temperature ≥ 38.0 °C
- Absence of general danger signs (unable to drink; repeated vomiting; recent history of convulsions; lethargic or unconscious state; unable to stand up or to sit)
Key exclusion criteria (9 listed)
- Adequate anti-malarial treatment within the previous 7 days
- Antibiotic treatment for a current infection
- Previous participation in a clinical trial
- Haemoglobin < 5 g/dl
- Leucocyte count: > 15000/µl
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Artesunate plus AmodiaquineAlso: Arsucam®Artesunate 50 mg and Amodiaquine 153 mg co-blister tablets: 3 days once daily weight-adjusted dosing according to manufacturer | Drug | ASAQ |
| Artemether-LumefantrineAlso: Coartem®Artemether 20 mg/Lumefantrine 120mg fixe-dose-combination tablets: 3 days twice daily weight-adjusted dosing according to manufacturer | Drug | AL |
Primary outcome
Clinical and PCR-controlled parasitological cure rate at day 28
Time frame: 28 days
7 secondary outcomes
Clinical and PCR-controlled parasitological cure rate at day 14
Time frame: 14 days
Effect on anaemia
Time frame: 28 days
Molecular Drug Resistance Markers
Time frame: 28 days
Recrudescence and Reinfection
Time frame: 28 days
Effects on Gametocytemia
Time frame: 28 days
Acceptance of Therapies
Time frame: 7 days
Incidences of malaria episodes over a follow-up period of 1 year
Time frame: 12 months
Results and safety
The study was stopped early (reason given: Interim analysis showed more LCFs in one of the treatment arms). Results are not available in the source record.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 27 Nov 2007.
- Background: PubMed 16871329Bukirwa H, Yeka A, Kamya MR, Talisuna A, Banek K, Bakyaita N, Rwakimari JB, Rosenthal PJ, Wabwire-Mangen F, Dorsey G, Staedke SG. Artemisinin combination therapies for treatment of uncomplicated malaria in Uganda. PLoS Clin Trials. 2006 May;1(1):e7. doi: 10.1371/journal.pctr.0010007. Epub 2006 May 19.
- Background: PubMed 15850631Mutabingwa TK, Anthony D, Heller A, Hallett R, Ahmed J, Drakeley C, Greenwood BM, Whitty CJ. Amodiaquine alone, amodiaquine+sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine, amodiaquine+artesunate, and artemether-lumefantrine for outpatient treatment of malaria in Tanzanian children: a four-arm randomised effectiveness trial. Lancet. 2005 Apr 23-29;365(9469):1474-80. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(05)66417-3.
- Background: PubMed 16760509Makanga M, Premji Z, Falade C, Karbwang J, Mueller EA, Andriano K, Hunt P, De Palacios PI. Efficacy and safety of the six-dose regimen of artemether-lumefantrine in pediatrics with uncomplicated Plasmodium falciparum malaria: a pooled analysis of individual patient data. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2006 Jun;74(6):991-8.
- Background: PubMed 16652314Price RN, Uhlemann AC, van Vugt M, Brockman A, Hutagalung R, Nair S, Nash D, Singhasivanon P, Anderson TJ, Krishna S, White NJ, Nosten F. Molecular and pharmacological determinants of the therapeutic response to artemether-lumefantrine in multidrug-resistant Plasmodium falciparum malaria. Clin Infect Dis. 2006 Jun 1;42(11):1570-7. doi: 10.1086/503423. Epub 2006 Apr 26.
- Background: PubMed 16163624Martensson A, Stromberg J, Sisowath C, Msellem MI, Gil JP, Montgomery SM, Olliaro P, Ali AS, Bjorkman A. Efficacy of artesunate plus amodiaquine versus that of artemether-lumefantrine for the treatment of uncomplicated childhood Plasmodium falciparum malaria in Zanzibar, Tanzania. Clin Infect Dis. 2005 Oct 15;41(8):1079-86. doi: 10.1086/444460. Epub 2005 Sep 13.
- Background: PubMed 16845638Sidhu AB, Uhlemann AC, Valderramos SG, Valderramos JC, Krishna S, Fidock DA. Decreasing pfmdr1 copy number in plasmodium falciparum malaria heightens susceptibility to mefloquine, lumefantrine, halofantrine, quinine, and artemisinin. J Infect Dis. 2006 Aug 15;194(4):528-35. doi: 10.1086/507115. Epub 2006 Jul 11.
Related trials for Malaria, Falciparum
RecruitingPhase 1
Safety, Tolerability and Efficacy of PfSPZ-LARC2 Vaccine Against CHMI in Malaria-Naïve Adults
Malaria Falciparum
Not yet recruiting
Three-arm Cluster Randomised Control Trial Evaluation of Guardian Spatial Emanator as a Complimentary Vector Control Tool in Papua New Guinea
Malaria
Active, not recruitingPhase 4
Improving Neonatal Health Through Rapid Malaria Testing in Early Pregnancy With High-Sensitivity Diagnostics
Malaria,Falciparum, Malaria in Pregnancy
Not yet recruiting
Permethrin-Treated Baby Wraps for Malaria Prevention in Refugee Settings
Malaria (Plasmodium Falciparum), Malaria Incidence
RecruitingPhase 1/2
DON in Pediatric Cerebral Malaria
Malaria, Cerebral
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Daniel Ansong, MD principal investigator
School of Medical Science (SMS), Kwame Nkrumah University of Science and Technology (KNUST), Kumasi, Ghana
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 4 study testing Artesunate plus Amodiaquine and Artemether-Lumefantrine in people with Malaria, Falciparum, run by Bernhard Nocht Institute for Tropical Medicine at 1 site in Ghana.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 8 inclusion and 9 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: stopped early, as of the sponsor's last update on 27 Nov 2007. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Ghana. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 4 studies take place after a treatment is approved, to learn more about its long-term benefits and risks in everyday use.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
The study was stopped early (reason given: Interim analysis showed more LCFs in one of the treatment arms). Results are not available in the source record.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Clinical and PCR-controlled parasitological cure rate at day 28 (time frame: 28 days). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT00374205, which also lists 6 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 27 Nov 2007.