AzTrials
AzTrials

AsthmaPhase 4NCT00377364

Acetaminophen (Tylenol) for Mood and Memory Changes Associated With Corticosteroid Therapy

A Phase 4 study of Asthma and Rheumatic Disease, run by University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center at 1 site in United States.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Studies in humans and animals support that stress and/or elevations in corticosteroids lead to changes in hippocampal structure and functioning. This is important as patients with major depression frequently have elevated cortisol, and millions of patients receive prescription corticosteroids (e.g. prednisone). Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 65 years
Conditions the study is for
Asthma, Rheumatic Disease
Type of treatment
Pill or oral medicine
Could I receive a placebo?
Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
How many people
30 participants
Where
1 siteUnited States
Study dates
Nov 2006to Oct 2008
Phase
Phase 4
Are there results?
Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 65 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Age 18-65
  • Scheduled to receive at least 20 mg/day of prednisone for at least 7 days
  • Baseline Rey Auditory Verbal Learning Test (RAVLT) total score of ≥40

Who cannot join

  • History of allergic reaction or other contraindication to acetaminophen therapy
  • Acetaminophen use within 24 hours of study entry
  • History of liver disease or alcohol use of greater than 3 drinks/day
  • Severe or unstable medical condition (e.g., recent myocardial infarction,renal failure, diabetes with poor glycemic control)
  • Pregnant or lactating female
  • Patient has mental retardation, dementia, or other severe cognitive disorder

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

United States1 site
  • UT Southwestern Medical Center at Dallas

    Dallas, Texas, 75390

Other trials in United States

About this study

Official title: Acetaminophen for Mood and Memory Changes Associated With Prednisone Therapy

Studies in humans and animals support that stress and/or elevations in corticosteroids lead to changes in hippocampal structure and functioning. This is important as patients with major depression frequently have elevated cortisol, and millions of patients receive prescription corticosteroids (e.g. prednisone). Both depression and corticosteroid therapy are associated with memory impairment and hippocampal atrophy. Our research uses corticosteroid-treated patients to explore interventions that might protect the brain from the effects of stress or corticosteroids. We propose to give 30 corticosteroid-treated asthma patients acetaminophen or placebo. Between group differences in mood, memory and other neurocognitive measures will serve as outcome measures.

Read the detailed description

SCIENTIFIC PROPOSAL

Aims Primary

  1. Determine if patients receiving prescription corticosteroid therapy who are given acetaminophen have smaller declines in declarative memory than those receiving placebo.
  2. Determine if patients receiving prescription corticosteroid therapy who are given acetaminophen have smaller increases in manic/hypomanic symptoms than those receiving placebo.

Secondary

  1. Determine if patients receiving prescription corticosteroid therapy who are given acetaminophen have smaller declines in cognitive domains other than declarative memory such as working memory and executive functioning than those receiving placebo.
  2. Determine if patients receiving prescription corticosteroid therapy who are given acetaminophen have smaller increases in depressive symptoms than those receiving placebo.

Background/Significance

Impact of stress or corticosteroids on the hippocampus:

Studies in animals suggest that stress-induced elevations in endogenous corticosteroids or the administration of exogenous corticosteroids are associated with cognitive deficits and changes in hippocampal structure which can (after extended exposure) include irreversible neuronal loss (Brown et al. 1999, 2004a; McEwen 1997, 2000). These findings have important implications as common psychiatric illnesses including major depressive and bipolar disorders are frequently associated with acute or chronic elevations in cortisol (Brown et al. 1999). In addition, each year approximately 10 million Americans are given prescription corticosteroids, such as prednisone or dexamethasone, for illnesses such as asthma, allergies, arthritis, and dermatological conditions (Brown et al. 1999).

The hippocampus is important as it mediates important cognitive processes and provides negative feedback to the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) axis (Jacobson \& Sapolsky 1991). Thus, hippocampal impairment could result in both memory loss and potentially even greater cortisol levels due to loss of normal negative feedback. This concept of hippocampal dysfunction leading to greater elevation in cortisol levels and additional hippocampal dysfunction has been termed the "glucocorticoid cascade hypothesis" (Sapolsky et al. 1986).

Several lines of evidence suggest that stress and corticosteroids may impair human hippocampal structure and functioning. Starkman et al. (1992) examined hippocampal volumes using Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) in 12 patients with cortisol elevations of 1-4 years duration secondary to Cushing's disease. In three patients, hippocampal volumes fell outside the 95% confidence interval reported in the literature. Atrophy correlated with mean cortisol levels. Our group recently reported poorer performance on a declarative memory task (a measure of hippocampal functioning), smaller hippocampal volume and lower levels of N-acetyl aspartate, a putative marker of neuronal viability, in a group of 17 asthma and arthritis patients receiving long-term prednisone therapy than in a control group of similar age, education level and medical history not receiving prednisone (Brown et al 2004b).

Studies in humans also suggest smaller hippocampal volumes by Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) in people with chronic or recurrent major depressive or bipolar disorders (Sheline et al. 1996; Bremner et al. 2000). Although none of these studies documented elevated cortisol levels at the time of the neuroimaging, mood disorders can be associated with an elevation in cortisol. Therefore, one explanation for these findings is hippocampal atrophy due to an excess of cortisol at some point in the illness.

Corticosteroids are associated with deficits in cognitive functioning, which may occur very rapidly after exposure and long before any changes in hippocampal structure could be detected with available imaging techniques. Thus, cognitive instruments may be a sensitive measure of early changes in the hippocampus due to corticosteroids. Declarative memory, assessed with instruments such as word lists or paragraph recall, appears to be particularly sensitive to hippocampal functioning (Squire 1992). Memory deficits have been reported in patients receiving short (days) (Naber et al. 1996, Bender et al. 1988, Newcomer et al. 1994, 1999) or long term (weeks, months or years) (Brown et al. 2004b, Keenan et al. 1996) exposures to exogenous corticosteroids.

Mood symptom with prescription corticosteroids In addition to cognitive effects, corticosteroids are also associated with changes in mood. Brief courses of prescription corticosteroids are associated primarily with manic or hypomanic symptoms (Brown et al. 2002; Naber et al. 1996) although clinically significant depressive symptoms are reported in some patients (Naber et al. 1996). Longer-term exposure to lower dosages of prednisone may be associated more strongly with depressive symptoms (Brown et al. 2004b; Keenan et al. 1996). We found lifetime prednisone-induced mood disorders in 60% of patients receiving chronic prednisone therapy (Bolanos et al. 2004).

Interventions to prevent or reverse hippocampal changes secondary to stress or corticosteroids In animal models, pharmacological interventions focusing on agents that directly reduce corticosteroid levels or reduce corticosteroid-induced elevations in serotonin or glutamate have been explored. A novel antidepressant not currently available in the U.S. for use in humans, tianeptine, appears to prevent and reverse morphological changes in the rat hippocampus during a stress paradigm (Conrad et al. 1996; Watanabe et al. 1992; Magarinos et al. 1999). An additional agent, which appears to prevent stress-induced hippocampal damage in rats, is the glutamate-release inhibitor phenytoin (Watanabe et al. 1992; Magarinos et al. 1999).

If an excess of corticosteroids is associated with memory impairment and eventual hippocampal volume loss, interventions that may prevent or reverse these changes are of great importance. Memory deficits secondary to brief (days to weeks) exposure to corticosteroids are clearly reversible with medication discontinuation. Even hippocampal changes with longer term corticosteroid exposure may be reversible. Starkman et al (1999) reported significant increases in hippocampal volumes, measured on MRI, and improvement in declarative memory in 22 patients with Cushing's disease approximately 3-18 months (mean 12 months) following successful treatment and normalization of cortisol levels. We reported on the use of lamotrigine, a glutamate release inhibitor, for 12 weeks in a group of 10 patients receiving long-term prednisone therapy (Brown et al 2003). We found statistically significant improvement in declarative memory, suggestive of a neuroprotective effect on the hippocampus, following lamotrigine therapy. We recently completed a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of phenytoin in patients receiving prednisone therapy (Brown et al 2005). Phenytoin was associated with a significantly smaller increase in hypomanic symptom severity than placebo during the prednisone exposure. However, it appears that phenytoin, not unexpectedly, may have also been associated with some negative effects on cognition. Thus, a medication with few cognitive effects may be a better choice for use in our model system.

Interventions to prevent or reverse the mood effects of prescription corticosteroids Only two controlled clinical trials have been conducted in patients with psychiatric symptoms secondary to corticosteroids. Falk et al. (1979) reported that lithium pretreatment might attenuate corticosteroid-induced mood symptoms. While 14% of patients receiving corticotropin therapy suffered from mood symptoms, none of the patients receiving corticotropin following lithium pretreatment had a mood disturbance. As discussed above, we gave a group of adult asthma patients either phenytoin or placebo at the same time they began a course of oral prednisone therapy. The group receiving phenytoin has a significantly smaller increase in manic symptom severity than the group receiving placebo (Brown et al. 2005, see also preliminary studies section). Case reports and small open-label studies suggest that lithium and other mood stabilizers including lamotrigine, carbamazepine, gabapentin, valproic acid, traditional neuroleptics (Ahmad and Rasul, 1999) and the newer atypical agents (Brown et al. 2004c) may effectively treat or prevent corticosteroid-induced mood symptoms after their development (Brown, 2003, Brown et al. 2003).

Our group has developed a research program using humans who receive prescription corticosteroids as anti-inflammatory and immunosuppressant therapy to explore the effects of the stress hormones on the hippocampus. Our current focus is on interventions that may prevent or reverse the effects of stress or corticosteroids on the hippocampus.

Acetaminophen as a neuroprotective agent Data suggest that acetaminophen is widely distributed in the central nervous system (Caurad et al. 2001a) and may have neuroprotective properties. Pertinent to the proposed study acetaminophen protects dopaminergic neurons against glutamate excitotoxicity in vitro (Casper et al. 2000) and protects hippocampal neurons from oxidative stress (Bisaglia et al 2002). Acetaminophen also reduces staphylococcal enterotoxin-induced increases in glutamate release in the rabbit brain (Huang et al 2004). Acetaminophen also alters monoamines in the rat brain (Courad et al. 2001b), and synaptic plasticity in the hippocampus through presynaptic serotonin receptors (Chen and Bazan, 2003). No reports were found on the effect of acetaminophen on mood or memory.

Summary A reliable early effect (beginning 1-2 days into therapy) of corticosteroids on the human hippocampus is a decline in performance on declarative memory tasks (e.g. word lists). Preclinical data suggest that acetaminophen may have neuroprotective properties. We propose to give patients scheduled to receive prescription corticosteroids either acetaminophen or placebo along with the corticosteroids. Our aim is to determine if the acetaminophen attenuates the decline in declarative memory, and development of hypomanic symptomatology (e.g. insomnia, irritability, agitation) better than placebo. If this pilot study shows promising results we would anticipate conducting a larger, more definitive study, with funding from National Institutes of Health (NIH).

Being tested
Drug: Acetaminophen, Drug: Placebo
Keywords
Acetaminophen, corticosteroids, prednisone
Medical subject headings
Asthma, Rheumatic Diseases

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Drug: Acetaminophen, Drug: PlaceboDrug

    Also called Tylenol

    Acetaminophen: Participants will be given acetaminophen (two 500 mg tablets) four times daily for 7 days, not exceeding 4,000 mg/day. Placebo: Participants will be given placebo(two 500 mg tablets) four times daily for 7 days

Study groups in NCT00377364
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
AcetaminophenExperimentalParticipants will be given acetaminophen (two 500 mg tablets) four times daily for 7 days.
Receives: Drug: Drug: Acetaminophen, Drug: Placebo
PlaceboPlacebo comparatorParticipants will be given an identical appearing placebo (two 500 mg tablets) four times daily for 7 days.
Receives: Drug: Drug: Acetaminophen, Drug: Placebo

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Rey Auditory Verbal Learning Test (RAVLT)

    This is a measure of declarative memory (associated with the hippocampus). The test consists of 15 nouns read aloud for five consecutive trials with each trial followed by a free-recall trial. Following the fifth trial, an interference list of 15 different words is presented followed by a free-recall trial of that list. Delayed recall of the first list is tested immediately following the interference list and after a 20-minute delay. A recognition test of 50 words including the 15 original words is presented after the delayed recall. RAVLT total score of ≥ 40 words on trials 1-5(from a range of 0 to 75 words possible)suggests relatively normal memory prior to prednisone therapy.

    Measured: Baseline

  2. Rey Auditory Verbal Learning Task (RAVLT)

    This is a measure of declarative memory (associated with the hippocampus), using the mean number of words (0-75) recalled from Trials I-V of the RAVLT ± the standard deviation. The assessement was conducted using the same procedures as at baseline. RAVLT total score of ≥ 40 words on trials 1-5(from a range of 0 to 75 words possible)suggests relatively normal memory prior to prednisone therapy.

    Measured: Exit (Day 3 or Day 7)

  3. Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HRSD-17)

    The assessment is a clinician administered rating of depression with 17 questions. The total score is indicates level of depression within the following ranges: none (0-5), mild (6-10), moderate (11-15), severe (16-20), and very severe (21+).

    Measured: Baseline

  4. Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HRSD-17)

    The assessment is a clinician administered rating of depression with 17 questions. The total score is indicates level of depression within the following ranges: none (0-5), mild (6-10), moderate (11-15), severe (16-20), and very severe (21+).

    Measured: Exit (Day 3 or Day 7)

  5. Young Mania Rating Scale (YMRS)

    This is an 11-item, observer rated measure of the severity of manic symptoms on a 5 point scale. The total score indicates overall severity of mania with a minimum of zero (indicating normalcy) and a maximum of 60 (indicating very severe).

    Measured: Baseline

  6. Young Mania Rating Scale (YMRS)

    This is an 11-item, observer rated measure of the severity of manic symptoms on a 5 point scale. The total score indicates overall severity of mania with a minimum of zero (indicating normalcy) and a maximum of 60 (indicating very severe).

    Measured: Exit (Day 3 or Day 7)

Secondary outcomes (4)
  1. Internal State Scale - Activation (ISS-ACT)

    Activation subscale assesses (hypo)manic symptoms. There are 16 questions on the total ISS, each rated on a series of visual analogue scale (VAS) items consisting of statement followed by a 100 mm line with anchor points at 0 and 100. The 16 questions divide into four subscales measuring activation; depression, global psychopathology, and well being. Depression Index (DI): Scores for items 7 and 9 are added to give a DI score ranging from 0-200 with 0 being absence of depressive symptoms and 200 indicating severe depressive symptoms. Well-Being Index (WB): Scores for items 3, 5 and 15 are added to give a WB score ranging form 0-300, with >125 indicating euthymia. Activation Index (ACT): Scores for items 6, 8, 10, 12 and 13 are added to give an ACT score ranging from 0-500, with >155 indicating mania. Perceived Conflict Index (PC): Scores for items 1, 2, 4, 11 and 14 are added to give a PC score ranging from 0-500, with higher scores indicating greater severity of psychopathology.

    Measured: Baseline

  2. Internal State Scale - Activation (ISS-ACT)

    Activation subscale assesses (hypo)manic symptoms. There are 16 questions on the total ISS, each rated on a series of visual analogue scale (VAS) items consisting of statement followed by a 100 mm line with anchor points at 0 and 100. The 16 questions divide into four subscales measuring activation; depression, global psychopathology, and well being. Depression Index (DI): Scores for items 7 and 9 are added to give a DI score ranging from 0-200 with 0 being absence of depressive symptoms and 200 indicating severe depressive symptoms. Well-Being Index (WB): Scores for items 3, 5 and 15 are added to give a WB score ranging form 0-300, with >125 indicating euthymia. Activation Index (ACT): Scores for items 6, 8, 10, 12 and 13 are added to give an ACT score ranging from 0-500, with >155 indicating mania. Perceived Conflict Index (PC): Scores for items 1, 2, 4, 11 and 14 are added to give a PC score ranging from 0-500, with higher scores indicating greater severity of psychopathology.

    Measured: Exit (Day 3 or Day 7)

  3. Asthma Control Questionnaire (ACQ)

    This is a seven item assessment of symptoms pertinent to asthma management, including day and nighttime symptoms; activity limitation; use of prn bronchodilators; a physiological measure of asthma (spirometry), forced expiratory volume in 1 second percent predicted (FEV1% predicted), which is the percentile of FEV1 compared to normal controls matched for age, height, gender, and race, in the scoring. Total mean is interpreted on a scale between 0 (asthma completely controlled) and 6 (asthma severely uncontrolled).

    Measured: Baseline

  4. Asthma Control Questionnaire

    This is a seven item assessment of symptoms pertinent to asthma management, including day and nighttime symptoms; activity limitation; use of prn bronchodilators; a physiological measure of asthma (spirometry), forced expiratory volume in 1 second percent predicted (FEV1% predicted), which is the percentile of FEV1 compared to normal controls matched for age, height, gender, and race, in the scoring. Total mean is interpreted on a scale between 0 (asthma completely controlled) and 6 (asthma severely uncontrolled).

    Measured: Exit (Day 3 or Day 7)

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted18 Sep 2006 (estimated)
  2. Study startNov 2006
  3. Primary completionOct 2008
  4. Study completionOct 2008

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 4
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Quadruple blind
Who is masked
Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor
Enrolment
30 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT00377364
Sponsor's protocol ID
022006-009
Status last verified
Apr 2016
First submitted
14 Sep 2006
Last updated
5 May 2016
Data monitoring committee
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 4 study of Asthma and Rheumatic Disease, run by University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center at 1 site in United States.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 6 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 5 May 2016. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this phase mean?

Phase 4 studies take place after a treatment is approved, to learn more about its long-term benefits and risks in everyday use.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 16 Jan 2014). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Rey Auditory Verbal Learning Test (RAVLT) (time frame: Baseline). The study lists 6 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 5 May 2016.

Free account

Keep searching with a free account

You’ve used your 3 free searches for this session. Log in or create a free AzTrials account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in