Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2Phase 3RECORDNCT00379769
RECORD: Rosiglitazone Evaluated for Cardiac Outcomes and Regulation of Glycaemia in Diabetes
A Phase 3 study testing Rosiglitazone, Sulfonylurea and Metformin in people with Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2, run by GlaxoSmithKline at 446 sites in 25 countries.
Trial summary
This study is a phase 3b, multicentre, randomised, open label, parallel group study. A 4-week run-in period will be followed by a median of 6 years of treatment with study medication in addition to continuation of background glucose lowering therapy. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 40 to 75 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2
- What is being tested?
- Rosiglitazone, Sulfonylurea and Metformin
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 4,447 participants
- Where
- 446 sitesin 25 countries
- Study dates
- Apr 2001to Dec 2008
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 40 to 75 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Patients with type II diabetes mellitus as defined by 1999 World Health Organisation criteria.
- Glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c) >7.0 % to = 9.0 % at visit 1.
- Use of an oral glucose lowering agent for a minimum of 6 months prior to screening and unchanged for 2 months prior to screening.
- Body mass index >25.0 kg/m2.
Who cannot join
- Patients receiving any other glucose lowering therapy which is not metformin or a sulfonylurea.
- Patients with systolic blood pressure >180 mmHg or diastolic blood pressure >105 mmHg.
- Patients who have required the use of insulin for glycaemic control at any time in the past.
- Hospitalisation for any major cardiovascular event in the last 3 months.
Trial locations and contacts
446 sites in 25 countries.
446 sites in 25 countries
France84 sites
GSK Investigational Site
Amilly, 28300
GSK Investigational Site
Arras, 62000
GSK Investigational Site
Aspach-le-Bas, 68700
GSK Investigational Site
Aubagne, 13400
GSK Investigational Site
Auchy-lès-Hesdin, 62770
GSK Investigational Site
Azille, 11700
GSK Investigational Site
Beaumont-le-Roger, 21170
GSK Investigational Site
Beaumont-sur-Lèze, 31870
GSK Investigational Site
Belfort, 90000
GSK Investigational Site
Belpech, 11420
GSK Investigational Site
Blotzheim
GSK Investigational Site
Bondy, 93143
GSK Investigational Site
BP 1542 Dijon, 21034
GSK Investigational Site
Broglie, 27270
GSK Investigational Site
Bully-les-Mines, Hauts-de-France, 62160
GSK Investigational Site
Calmont, 31560
GSK Investigational Site
Carbonne, 31390
GSK Investigational Site
Carcassonne, 11000
GSK Investigational Site
Carcassonne
GSK Investigational Site
Cassis, 13260
GSK Investigational Site
Castelnaudary, 11400
GSK Investigational Site
Catelnaudary, 11400
GSK Investigational Site
Cernay, 68700
GSK Investigational Site
Champhol, 28300
GSK Investigational Site
Chartres, 28000
GSK Investigational Site
Colmar, 68000
GSK Investigational Site
Corbeil Essonne, 91014
GSK Investigational Site
Coursan, 11110
GSK Investigational Site
Cuincy, 59553
GSK Investigational Site
Danjoutin, 90400
GSK Investigational Site
Dessenheim, 68600
GSK Investigational Site
Dieppe, 76200
GSK Investigational Site
Dunkirk, 59385
GSK Investigational Site
Épernon, 28230
GSK Investigational Site
Gémenos, 13420
GSK Investigational Site
Hanches, 28130
GSK Investigational Site
Hautot-sur-Mer, 76550
GSK Investigational Site
Husseren-Wesserling, 68470
GSK Investigational Site
Kembs, 68680
GSK Investigational Site
La Barre-en-Ouche, 27330
GSK Investigational Site
La Verdière, 83560
GSK Investigational Site
Labarth-Sur-Leze, 31860
GSK Investigational Site
Labarthe-sur-Lèze, 31860
GSK Investigational Site
Le Grau-du-Roi, 30240
GSK Investigational Site
Le Lherm 31600, 31600
GSK Investigational Site
Le Perray-en-Yvelines, 78610
GSK Investigational Site
Lezignan-Corbières, 11200
GSK Investigational Site
Maintenon, 28130
GSK Investigational Site
Marseille, 13001
GSK Investigational Site
Marseille, 13003
GSK Investigational Site
Marseille, 13008
GSK Investigational Site
Marseille, 13011
GSK Investigational Site
Marseille, 13013
GSK Investigational Site
Marseille, 13014
GSK Investigational Site
Marseille, 13016
GSK Investigational Site
Masevaux, 68290
GSK Investigational Site
Maubeuge, 59600
GSK Investigational Site
Monfort Sur Risle, 27290
GSK Investigational Site
Mulhouse, 68100
GSK Investigational Site
Muret, 31600
GSK Investigational Site
Nassandres, 27550
GSK Investigational Site
Nevers, 58033
GSK Investigational Site
Nogent-le-Phaye, 28630
GSK Investigational Site
Orbec, 14290
GSK Investigational Site
Paris, 75730
GSK Investigational Site
Pierre-Bénite, 69495
GSK Investigational Site
Pierres, 28130
GSK Investigational Site
Pinsaguel, 31120
GSK Investigational Site
Roux Mesnil Bouteille, 76370
GSK Investigational Site
Rugles, 27250
GSK Investigational Site
Saint Leger Sur Yvelines, 78610
GSK Investigational Site
Saint-Eulalie Badens, 11800
GSK Investigational Site
Seysses, 31600
GSK Investigational Site
Thann, 68800
GSK Investigational Site
Thiberville, 27230
GSK Investigational Site
Toulouse, 31000
GSK Investigational Site
Toulouse, 31400
GSK Investigational Site
Toulouse, 31500
GSK Investigational Site
Trebbes, 01800
GSK Investigational Site
Trèbes, 11800
GSK Investigational Site
Valenciennes, 59322
GSK Investigational Site
Vogelsheim, 68600
GSK Investigational Site
Voves, 28150
GSK Investigational Site
Wittenheim, 68270
United Kingdom60 sites
GSK Investigational Site
Airdrie, Lanarkshire, ML6 0JS
GSK Investigational Site
Airdrie, ML6 0JH
GSK Investigational Site
Airdrie, ML6 0JU
GSK Investigational Site
Ashford, TW15 2TU
GSK Investigational Site
Bath, BA2 3HT
GSK Investigational Site
Cambridge, Cambridgeshire, CB2 2QQ
GSK Investigational Site
Chesterfield, Derbyshire, S40 4TF
GSK Investigational Site
Chesterfield, Derbyshire, S44 6DE
GSK Investigational Site
Chesterfield, S40 1LE
GSK Investigational Site
Chippenham, SN15 2SB
GSK Investigational Site
Coatbridge, ML5 3AP
GSK Investigational Site
Colney, NR4 7UY
GSK Investigational Site
Corsham, Wiltshire, SN13 9DL
GSK Investigational Site
Cumbernauld, G67 3BE
GSK Investigational Site
Dronfield, S18 1RU
GSK Investigational Site
Dumbarton, G82 1PW
GSK Investigational Site
East Kilbride, G75 8RG
GSK Investigational Site
Falmouth, TR11 2LH
GSK Investigational Site
Fowley, Cornwall, PL23 1DT
GSK Investigational Site
Frome, Somerset, BA11 1EZ
GSK Investigational Site
Garston, Watford, WD2 6EB
GSK Investigational Site
Gateshead, NE9 6SX
GSK Investigational Site
Glasgow, Lanarkshire, G51 4TF
GSK Investigational Site
Glasgow, Lanarkshire
GSK Investigational Site
Glasgow, G5 OPQ
GSK Investigational Site
Glasgow
GSK Investigational Site
Glastonbury, Somerset, BA6 9LP
GSK Investigational Site
Hamilton, Lanarkshire, ML3 0DR
GSK Investigational Site
Hamilton, ML3 8AA
GSK Investigational Site
Harrow, HA3 7LT
GSK Investigational Site
Kirkintilloch, G66 1JB
GSK Investigational Site
Leicester, Leicestershire, LE1 5WW
GSK Investigational Site
Leigh-on-Sea, SS9 2SQ
GSK Investigational Site
Linwood, Renfrewshire
GSK Investigational Site
Motherwell, Lanarkshire, ML1 3JX
GSK Investigational Site
Motherwell, ML1 2PS
GSK Investigational Site
Newcastle upon Tyne, NE1 4LP
GSK Investigational Site
Newport, PO30 5TG
GSK Investigational Site
Northampton, Northamptonshire, NN1 5BD
GSK Investigational Site
Northampton, Northamptonshire, NN5 7AQ
GSK Investigational Site
Nottingham, NG5 1PB
GSK Investigational Site
Old Whittington, Chesterfield, S41 9JZ
GSK Investigational Site
Paisley, Renfrewshire, PA1 1UB
GSK Investigational Site
Paisley, PA3 2DY
GSK Investigational Site
Penzance, TR18 4JH
GSK Investigational Site
Rubery, Birmingham, B45 9JT
GSK Investigational Site
Rugby, Warwickshire, CV21 3SP
GSK Investigational Site
Rugby, Warwickshire, CV22 5PX
GSK Investigational Site
Sheffield, S5 7QB
GSK Investigational Site
Sheffield, S5 7TW
GSK Investigational Site
Thornhill, DG3 5AA
GSK Investigational Site
Thornhill, Cardiff, CF14 9BB
GSK Investigational Site
Trowbridge, Wiltshire, BA14 8QA
GSK Investigational Site
Trowbridge, Wiltshire, BA14 9AR
GSK Investigational Site
Uddingston, G71 5SU
GSK Investigational Site
Westbury, Wiltshire, BA13 3JD
GSK Investigational Site
Weston-super-Mare, BS23 4BP
GSK Investigational Site
Wishaw, ML2 7BQ
GSK Investigational Site
Woking, GU21 1TD
GSK Investigational Site
Worle, Weston-Super-Mare, BS22 6AJ
Germany24 sites
GSK Investigational Site
Bad Lauterberg im Harz, Lower Saxony, 37431
GSK Investigational Site
Beckum, North Rhine-Westphalia, 59269
GSK Investigational Site
Burgstädt, Saxony, 09217
GSK Investigational Site
Chemnitz, Saxony, 09130
GSK Investigational Site
Dresden, Saxony, 01307
GSK Investigational Site
Friedrichsthal, Saarland, 66299
GSK Investigational Site
Gau-Algesheim, Rhineland-Palatinate, 55435
GSK Investigational Site
Hamburg, Free and Hanseatic City of Hamburg, 20249
GSK Investigational Site
Heidelberg, Baden-Wurttemberg, 69120
GSK Investigational Site
Kallstadt, Rhineland-Palatinate, 67169
GSK Investigational Site
Kronach, Bavaria, 96317
GSK Investigational Site
Kronberg, Hesse, 61476
GSK Investigational Site
Lambrecht, Rhineland-Palatinate, 67466
GSK Investigational Site
Leipzig, Saxony, 04103
GSK Investigational Site
Menden, North Rhine-Westphalia, 58706
GSK Investigational Site
Ober-Mörlen, Hesse, 61239
GSK Investigational Site
Offenbach, Hesse, 63071
GSK Investigational Site
Rhaunen, Rhineland-Palatinate, 55624
GSK Investigational Site
Sinsheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, 74889
GSK Investigational Site
Speyer, Rhineland-Palatinate, 67346
GSK Investigational Site
Stuttgart, Baden-Wurttemberg, 70197
GSK Investigational Site
Suhl, Thuringia, 98529
GSK Investigational Site
Wetzlar, Hesse, 35578
GSK Investigational Site
Würzburg, Bavaria, 97070
Italy22 sites
GSK Investigational Site
Bari, 70124
GSK Investigational Site
Bologna, Emilia-Romagna, 40138
GSK Investigational Site
Brescia, Lombardy, 25123
GSK Investigational Site
Cagliari, Sardinia, 09127
GSK Investigational Site
Campobasso, Molise, 86100
GSK Investigational Site
Genoa, Liguria, 16132
GSK Investigational Site
Milan, Lombardy, 20162
GSK Investigational Site
Naples, Campania, 80136
GSK Investigational Site
Nocera Inferiore (SA), Campania, 84014
GSK Investigational Site
Palermo, Sicily, 90127
GSK Investigational Site
Parma, 43100
GSK Investigational Site
Pisa, Tuscany, 56126
GSK Investigational Site
Reggio Calabria, Calabria, 89100
GSK Investigational Site
Rimini, Emilia-Romagna, 47900
GSK Investigational Site
Roma, 00168
GSK Investigational Site
Rome, Lazio, 00155
GSK Investigational Site
Rome, Lazio, 00168
GSK Investigational Site
Salerno, Campania, 84100
GSK Investigational Site
San Donato (MI), Lombardy, 20097
GSK Investigational Site
Sassari, Sardinia, 07100
GSK Investigational Site
Treviglio (BG), Lombardy, 13115
GSK Investigational Site
Turin, Piedmont, 10122
Sweden21 sites
GSK Investigational Site
Eksjö, SE-575 81
GSK Investigational Site
Gothenburg, SE-413 45
GSK Investigational Site
Gothenburg, SE-416 65
GSK Investigational Site
Gothenburg, SE-417 17
GSK Investigational Site
Helsingborg, SE-254 37
GSK Investigational Site
Köping, SE-73181
GSK Investigational Site
Kristianstad, SE-291 85
GSK Investigational Site
Kungälv, SE-442 83
GSK Investigational Site
Linköpiing, SE-582 25
GSK Investigational Site
Linköping, SE-582 46
GSK Investigational Site
Lund, SE-221 85
GSK Investigational Site
Mora, SE-792 85
GSK Investigational Site
Nacka, SE-131 83
GSK Investigational Site
Norrköping, SE-602 20
GSK Investigational Site
Oskarshamn, SE-572 28
GSK Investigational Site
Skene, SE-511 62
GSK Investigational Site
Stockholm, SE-182 88
GSK Investigational Site
Uddevalla, SE-451 40
GSK Investigational Site
Umeå, SE-901 85
GSK Investigational Site
Uppsala, SE-751 25
GSK Investigational Site
Vadstena, SE-592 32
Finland19 sites
GSK Investigational Site
Espoo, 02600
GSK Investigational Site
Espoo, 02710
GSK Investigational Site
Hanko, 10900
GSK Investigational Site
Helsinki, 00150
GSK Investigational Site
Helsinki, 00810
GSK Investigational Site
Helsinki, 00930
GSK Investigational Site
Hyvinkää, 05800
GSK Investigational Site
Jyväskylä, 40100
GSK Investigational Site
Kerava, 04200
GSK Investigational Site
Kuopio, 70210
GSK Investigational Site
Lahti, 15850
GSK Investigational Site
Lappeenranta, 53100
GSK Investigational Site
Oulun Kaupunki, 90015
GSK Investigational Site
Riihimäki, 11130
GSK Investigational Site
Rovaniemi
GSK Investigational Site
Seinäjoki, 60220
GSK Investigational Site
Tampere, 33100
GSK Investigational Site
Turku, 20100
GSK Investigational Site
Turku, 20700
Hungary19 sites
GSK Investigational Site
Budapest, 1062
GSK Investigational Site
Budapest, 1083
GSK Investigational Site
Budapest, 1096
GSK Investigational Site
Budapest, 1097
GSK Investigational Site
Budapest, 1115
GSK Investigational Site
Budapest, 1125
GSK Investigational Site
Budapest, 1145
GSK Investigational Site
Debrecen, 4043
GSK Investigational Site
Eger
GSK Investigational Site
Győr, 9024
GSK Investigational Site
Gyula, 5701
GSK Investigational Site
Kurtag99
GSK Investigational Site
Nyiregyháza, 4400
GSK Investigational Site
Patkaj98
GSK Investigational Site
Siófok, 8601
GSK Investigational Site
Szentes, 6600
GSK Investigational Site
Szombathely, 9700
GSK Investigational Site
Veszprém, 8200
GSK Investigational Site
Zalaegerszeg, 8900
Netherlands18 sites
GSK Investigational Site
Geleen, 6160 BB
GSK Investigational Site
Groningen, 9711 SG
GSK Investigational Site
Hengelo, 7555 DL
GSK Investigational Site
Hoogvliet, 3192 JN
GSK Investigational Site
Kerkrade, 6461 XP
GSK Investigational Site
Landgraaf, 6373 JS
GSK Investigational Site
Musselkanaal, 9581 AD
GSK Investigational Site
Nijmegen, 6525 EC
GSK Investigational Site
Oude Pekela, 9665 AR
GSK Investigational Site
Ridderkerk, 2985 BV
GSK Investigational Site
Rijswijk, 2281 AK
GSK Investigational Site
Roosendaal, 4701 LJ
GSK Investigational Site
Rotterdam, 3021 HC
GSK Investigational Site
Rotterdam, 3082 KC
GSK Investigational Site
Sint Willebrord, 4711 EG
GSK Investigational Site
Zoetermeer, 2724 EK
GSK Investigational Site
Zwijndrecht, 3331 AE
GSK Investigational Site
Zwijndrecht, 3334 XA
Poland17 sites
GSK Investigational Site
Bialystok, 15-276
GSK Investigational Site
Bydgoszcz, 85 822
GSK Investigational Site
Gdansk, 80 211
GSK Investigational Site
Grudziądz, 86-300
GSK Investigational Site
Krakow, 31 261
GSK Investigational Site
Krakow, 31 501
GSK Investigational Site
Lodz, 90 030
GSK Investigational Site
Lublin, 02 081
GSK Investigational Site
Lublin, 20-718
GSK Investigational Site
Olsztyn, 10 461
GSK Investigational Site
Poznan, 60-834
GSK Investigational Site
Poznan, 61 696
GSK Investigational Site
Warsaw, 01 887
GSK Investigational Site
Warsaw, 01-337
GSK Investigational Site
Warsaw, 02 507
GSK Investigational Site
Warsaw, 02-042
GSK Investigational Site
Wroclaw, 50-127
Slovakia16 sites
GSK Investigational Site
Banská Bystrica, 975 17
GSK Investigational Site
Bratislava, 811 08
GSK Investigational Site
Bratislava, 813 69
GSK Investigational Site
Bratislava, 82102
GSK Investigational Site
Bratislava, 82108
GSK Investigational Site
Košice, 040 11
GSK Investigational Site
Košice, 041 90
GSK Investigational Site
Kysucké Nové Mesto, 024 01
GSK Investigational Site
Ľubochňa, 034 91
GSK Investigational Site
Lučenec, 984 01
GSK Investigational Site
Prešov, 08001
GSK Investigational Site
Prievidza, 97201
GSK Investigational Site
Šahy, 936 01
GSK Investigational Site
Šamorín, 931 01
GSK Investigational Site
Trenčín, 911 01
GSK Investigational Site
Žilina, 010 01
Spain16 sites
GSK Investigational Site
Badalona, 08911
GSK Investigational Site
Barcelona, 08025
GSK Investigational Site
Barcelona, 08036
GSK Investigational Site
Benidorm, 03500
GSK Investigational Site
Bilbao, 48903
GSK Investigational Site
Cáceres, 10003
GSK Investigational Site
Cadiz, 11009
GSK Investigational Site
Granada, 18012
GSK Investigational Site
Madrid, 28034
GSK Investigational Site
Madrid, 28040
GSK Investigational Site
Palma de Mallorca, 7014
GSK Investigational Site
Reus, 43201
GSK Investigational Site
Santander, 38008
GSK Investigational Site
Vazquc56
GSK Investigational Site
Vizcaya, 48910
GSK Investigational Site
Vizcaya, 48920
Belgium13 sites
GSK Investigational Site
Antwerp, 2000
GSK Investigational Site
Arlon, 6700
GSK Investigational Site
Brussels, 1090
GSK Investigational Site
Edegem, 2650
GSK Investigational Site
Genk, 3600
GSK Investigational Site
Ghent, 9000
GSK Investigational Site
Kortrijk, 8500
GSK Investigational Site
Liège, 4000
GSK Investigational Site
Moerkerke, 8340
GSK Investigational Site
Oostham, 3945
GSK Investigational Site
Roeselare, 8800
GSK Investigational Site
Sint-Gillis-Waas, 9170
GSK Investigational Site
Vilvoorde, 1800
Greece13 sites
GSK Investigational Site
Athens, 115 27
GSK Investigational Site
Athens, 11521
GSK Investigational Site
Athens, 11527
GSK Investigational Site
Athens, 18537
GSK Investigational Site
Haidari, Athens, 12462
GSK Investigational Site
Ioannina, 45001
GSK Investigational Site
Marousi, 15123
GSK Investigational Site
Pátrai, 26335
GSK Investigational Site
Pátrai, 26500
GSK Investigational Site
Piraeus-Athens, 18454
GSK Investigational Site
Piraeus-Athens, 18536
GSK Investigational Site
Thessaloniki, 564 29
GSK Investigational Site
Thessalonikis, 57010
Czechia12 sites
GSK Investigational Site
Brno, 625 00
GSK Investigational Site
České Budějovice, 370 87
GSK Investigational Site
Holice V Cechach, 534 01
GSK Investigational Site
Hradec Králové, 500 05
GSK Investigational Site
Jindřichův Hradec, 377 38
GSK Investigational Site
Ostrava Poruba, 708 52
GSK Investigational Site
Písek, 397 01
GSK Investigational Site
Prague, 128 42
GSK Investigational Site
Prague, 140 21
GSK Investigational Site
Rakovník, 269 01
GSK Investigational Site
Tábor, 390 00
GSK Investigational Site
Trutnov, 541 21
Denmark12 sites
GSK Investigational Site
Aalborg, DK-9100
GSK Investigational Site
Aarhus
GSK Investigational Site
Copenhagen, 2300
GSK Investigational Site
Glostrup Municipality
GSK Investigational Site
Hilleroed, 3400
GSK Investigational Site
København NV
GSK Investigational Site
Køge, 4600
GSK Investigational Site
Kolding, DK-6000
GSK Investigational Site
Næstved, 4700
GSK Investigational Site
Odense C, DK-5000
GSK Investigational Site
Silkeborg, 8600
GSK Investigational Site
Slagelse, 4200
Australia11 sites
GSK Investigational Site
Carina Heights, Queensland, 4152
GSK Investigational Site
Heidelberg, Victoria, 3084
GSK Investigational Site
Keswick, South Australia, 5035
GSK Investigational Site
Kippa-Ring, Queensland, 4021
GSK Investigational Site
Malvern, Victoria, 3144
GSK Investigational Site
Miranda, New South Wales, 2228
GSK Investigational Site
North Adelaide, South Australia, 5006
GSK Investigational Site
Port Lincoln, South Australia, 5606
GSK Investigational Site
Randwick, New South Wales, 2031
GSK Investigational Site
Sherwood, Queensland, 4075
GSK Investigational Site
Wollongong, New South Wales, 2500
Estonia10 sites
GSK Investigational Site
Paide, 72714
GSK Investigational Site
Pärnu, 80018
GSK Investigational Site
Rakvere, 44316
GSK Investigational Site
Saku, 75501
GSK Investigational Site
Tallinn, 10138
GSK Investigational Site
Tallinn, 1162
GSK Investigational Site
Tallinn, 11911
GSK Investigational Site
Tallinn, 13415
GSK Investigational Site
Tartu
GSK Investigational Site
Viljandi, 71024
Latvia10 sites
GSK Investigational Site
Jēkabpils, LV 5201
GSK Investigational Site
Lagzdi60
GSK Investigational Site
Limbaži, LV 4001
GSK Investigational Site
Ogre, LV 5001
GSK Investigational Site
Riga, 1006
GSK Investigational Site
Riga, LV 1011
GSK Investigational Site
Riga, LV 1057
GSK Investigational Site
Riga, LV1002
GSK Investigational Site
Sturii59
GSK Investigational Site
Tukums, LV 3100
Bulgaria8 sites
GSK Investigational Site
Pleven, 5800
GSK Investigational Site
Plovdiv, 4002
GSK Investigational Site
Sofia, 1233
GSK Investigational Site
Sofia, 1301
GSK Investigational Site
Sofia, 1303
GSK Investigational Site
Sofia, 1431/1000
GSK Investigational Site
Sofia, 1606
GSK Investigational Site
Varna, 9010
Lithuania8 sites
GSK Investigational Site
Kaunas, LT-47144
GSK Investigational Site
Kaunas, LT-49476
GSK Investigational Site
Kaunas, LT-50009
GSK Investigational Site
Kaunas, LT-51270
GSK Investigational Site
Klaipėda, 92304
GSK Investigational Site
Vilnius, LT 08661
GSK Investigational Site
Vilnius, LT-04318
GSK Investigational Site
Vilnius, LT-10103
New Zealand8 sites
GSK Investigational Site
Christchurch, 8011
GSK Investigational Site
Dunedin, 9016
GSK Investigational Site
Hastings, Private Bag 9014
GSK Investigational Site
Otahuhu, Auckland, 2025
GSK Investigational Site
Palmerston North, 4410
GSK Investigational Site
Takapuna, Auckland, 0620
GSK Investigational Site
Tauranga, 3112
GSK Investigational Site
Wellington, 6002
Romania7 sites
GSK Investigational Site
Bucharest, 011234
GSK Investigational Site
Bucharest, 020475
GSK Investigational Site
Bucharest, 022448
GSK Investigational Site
Cluj-Napoca, 400006
GSK Investigational Site
Craiova, 2000642
GSK Investigational Site
Iași, 700111
GSK Investigational Site
Timișoara, 293406
Ukraine7 sites
GSK Investigational Site
Dnipro, 49044
GSK Investigational Site
Kharkiv, 61002
GSK Investigational Site
Kiev, 02175
GSK Investigational Site
Kiev, 04114
GSK Investigational Site
Kyiv, 01004
GSK Investigational Site
Lviv, 79010
GSK Investigational Site
Vinnitsa, 21010
Russia6 sites
GSK Investigational Site
Moscow, 115 280
GSK Investigational Site
Moscow, 117049
GSK Investigational Site
Moscow, 125367
GSK Investigational Site
Moscow, 129110
GSK Investigational Site
Saint Petersburg, 194291
GSK Investigational Site
Saint Petersburg, 195257
Croatia5 sites
GSK Investigational Site
Krapinske Toplice, 49217
GSK Investigational Site
Rijeka, 51000
GSK Investigational Site
Slavonski Brod, 35000
GSK Investigational Site
Varaždin, 42000
GSK Investigational Site
Zagreb, 10000
About this study
Official title: A Long Term, Open Label, Randomised Study in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes, Comparing the Combination of Rosiglitazone and Either Metformin or Sulfonylurea With Metformin Plus Sulfonylurea on Cardiovascular Endpoints and Glycaemia
This study is a phase 3b, multicentre, randomised, open label, parallel group study. A 4-week run-in period will be followed by a median of 6 years of treatment with study medication in addition to continuation of background glucose lowering therapy. Patients inadequately controlled on background metformin will be randomised to receive, in addition to metformin, either rosiglitazone or a sulfonylurea(glibenclamide, gliclazide or glimepiride) in a ratio of 1:1. Patients inadequately controlled on background SU will be randomised to receive, in addition to SU, either rosiglitazone or metformin in a ratio of 1:1. Equal numbers of patients receiving background metformin and SU at entry will be entered into the study.
Read the detailed description
A RECORD follow-up study is being performed to monitor the incidence of cancer and bone fractures in RECORD patients for a period of 4 years after the end of the main RECORD study (2008 - 2012).
- Conditions
- Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2
- Being tested
- Rosiglitazone, Sulfonylurea, Metformin
- Keywords
- diabetes, CV outcomes, rosiglitazone, Type II diabetes, sulfonylurea, RECORD, metformin
- Medical subject headings
- Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2, Diabetes Mellitus
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
RosiglitazoneDrug
Rosiglitazone maximum 8 mg per day
SulfonylureaDrug
Sulfonylurea (SU) maximum permitted daily dose
MetforminDrug
Metformin maximum permitted daily dose .
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| rosiglitazone in addition to background metformin | Experimental | Participants inadequately controlled on background metformin (MET) were randomised to receive rosiglitazone (RSG), in addition to MET. RSG was initiated as a 4 mg once daily dose and was increased to a maximum dose of 8 mg per day as required to achieve a target HbA1c of less than or equal to 7.0 percent. Receives: Drug: Rosiglitazone; Drug: Metformin |
| rosiglitazone in addition to background sulfonylurea | Experimental | Participants inadequately controlled on background SU were randomised to receive, in addition to SU, RSG. RSG was initiated as a 4 mg once daily dose and was increased to a maximum dose of 8 mg per day as required to achieve a target HbA1c of less than or equal to 7.0 percent. Receives: Drug: Rosiglitazone; Drug: Sulfonylurea |
| Sulfonylurea in addition to background metformin | Active comparator | Participants inadequately controlled on background MET were randomised to receive, in addition to MET, a sulfonylurea (SU) (glibenclamide, gliclazide, or glimepiride). The SU was gradually increased to the maximum permitted dose (glibenclamide 15 mg per day or miconizied equivalent of 10.5 mg per day; gliclazide 240 mg per day; glimepiride 4 mg per day) as required to achieve a target HbA1c of less than or equal to 7.0 percent. Receives: Drug: Sulfonylurea; Drug: Metformin |
| Metformin in addition to background sulfonylurea | Active comparator | Participants inadequately controlled on background SU were randomised to receive, in addition to SU, MET. MET was gradually increased to the maximum permitted dose of 2550 mg per day as required to achieve a target HbA1c of less than or equal to 7.0 percent. Receives: Drug: Sulfonylurea; Drug: Metformin |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Number of Participants With Cardiovascular Death/Cardiovascular Hospitalisation Events
The number of participants with cardiovascular death events (death due to cardiovascular causes or deaths with insufficient information to rule out a cardiovascular cause) and cardiovascular hospitalisation events (hospitalisation for a cardiovascular event, excluding planned admissions not associated with a worsening of the disease/condition of the participant) was recorded.
Measured: Baseline through End of Study (up to 7.5 years)
Independent Re-adjudication Outcome: Number of Participants Who Died Due to Any Cause
All deaths identified during the original record study and discovered after the re-adjudication efforts began were included.
Measured: Baseline through End of Study (up to 7.5 years)
Independent Re-adjudication (IR) Outcome: Number of Participants With a First Occurrence of a Major Adverse Cardiovascular Event (MACE) Defined as CV (or Unknown) Death, Non-fatal MI, and Non-fatal Stroke Based on Original RECORD Endpoint Definitions
IR was based on original RECORD endpoint definitions. CV death= no unequivocal non-CV cause (sudden death, death from acute vascular events, heart failure, acute MI, other CV causes, and deaths adjudicated as unknown cause). MI event=hospitalization + elevation of specific cardiac biomarkers above the upper limit of normal + cardiac ischemia symptoms/new pathological electrocardiogram findings. Stroke event=hospitalization + rapidly developed clinical signs of focal/global disturbance of cerebral function for more than 24 hours, with no apparent cause other than a vascular origin.
Measured: Baseline through End of Study (up to 7.5 years)
Independent Re-adjudication Outcome: Number of Participants With a First Occurrence of a Major Adverse Cardiovascular Event (MACE) Defined as CV (or Unknown) Death, Non-fatal MI, and Non-fatal Stroke Based on Contemporary Endpoint Definitions
Independent re-adjudication was based on the Standard Data Collection for Cardiovascular Trials Initiative (draft October 2011) endpoint definitions. CV death included death resulting from an acute MI; sudden cardiac death and death due to heart failure, stroke, and to other CV causes. Deaths of unknown cause were counted as CV deaths. MI was defined as evidence of myocardial necrosis in a clinical setting consistent with myocardial ischemia. Stroke was defined as an acute episode of neurological dysfunction caused by focal or global brain, spinal cord, or retinal vascular injury.
Measured: Baseline through End of Study (up to 7.5 years)
Independent Re-adjudication Outcome: Number of Participants With a CV (or Unknown) Death, Based on Original RECORD Endpoint Definitions
The number of participants with a CV death (or unknown) as determined by independent re-adjudication using the original RECORD endpoint definitions was recorded. CV death was defined as any death for which an unequivocal non-CV cause could not be established. CV death included death following heart failure, death following acute myocardial infarction (MI), sudden death, death due to acute vascular events, and other CV causes. Deaths due to unknown causes were classified as "unknown deaths," but were counted as CV deaths for the analysis of this endpoint.
Measured: Baseline through End of Study (up to 7.5 years)
Independent Re-adjudication Outcome: Number of Participants With a CV (or Unknown) Death, Based on Contemporary Endpoint Definitions
The number of participants with a CV (or unknown) death as determined by independent re-adjudication using the Standard Data Collection for Cardiovascular Trials Initiative (draft October 2011) endpoint definitions was recorded. CV death included death resulting from an acute myocardial infarction (MI), sudden cardiac death, death due to heart failure, death due to stroke, and death due to other CV causes. Deaths of unknown cause were counted as CV deaths.
Measured: Baseline through End of Study (up to 7.5 years)
Independent Re-adjudication Outcome: Number of Participants With an Event of Myocardial Infarction (Fatal and Non-fatal), Based on Original RECORD Endpoint Definitions
The number of participants with an MI (fatal or non-fatal) event as determined by independent re-adjudication using the original RECORD endpoint definitions was recorded. An event of MI was defined as hospitalization plus elevation of cardiac biomarkers troponin (TN) I and/or TNT above the upper limit of normal (ULN) or creatinine kinase (CK) MB (M=muscle type; B=brain type) isoenzyme >= 2x the ULN or CK > 2x the ULN plus typical symptoms of cardiac ischemia or new pathological electrocardiogram findings, or cause of death adjudicated as MI.
Measured: Baseline through End of Study (up to 7.5 years)
Independent Re-adjudication Outcome: Number of Participants With an Event of Myocardial Infarction (Fatal and Non-fatal), Based on Contemporary Endpoint Definitions
The number of participants with an MI (fatal or non-fatal) event as determined by independent re-adjudication using the Standard Data Collection for Cardiovascular Trials Initiative (draft October 2011) endpoint definitions was recorded. An event of MI was defined as evidence of myocardial necrosis in a clinical setting consistent with myocardial ischemia.
Measured: Baseline through End of Study (up to 7.5 years)
Independent Re-adjudication Outcome: Number of Participants (Par.) With an Event of Stroke (Fatal and Non-fatal), Based on Original RECORD Endpoint Definitions
Par. with a stroke (fatal or non-fatal) event as determined by independent re-adjudication using the original RECORD endpoint definitions was recorded. A stroke event=hospitalization plus rapidly developed clinical signs of focal (or global) disturbance of cerebral function lasting more than 24 hours (unless interrupted by thrombolysis, surgery, or death), with no apparent cause other than a vascular origin, including par. presenting clinical signs/symptoms suggestive of subarachnoid haemorrhage/intracerebral haemorrhage/cerebral ischemic necrosis or cause of death adjudicated as stroke.
Measured: Baseline through End of Study (up to 7.5 years)
Independent Re-adjudication Outcome: Number of Participants With an Event of Stroke (Fatal and Non-fatal), Based on Contemporary Endpoint Definitions
The number of participants with a stroke (fatal or non-fatal) event as determined by independent re-adjudication using the Standard Data Collection for Cardiovascular Trials Initiative (draft October 2011) endpoint definitions was recorded. An event of stroke was defined as an acute episode of neurological dysfunction caused by focal or global brain, spinal cord, or retinal vascular injury.
Measured: Baseline through End of Study (up to 7.5 years)
Secondary outcomes (43)
Number of Participants With Cardiovascular Events and All-cause Deaths
Composites of participants with first cardiovascular (CV) hospitalisations and CV death or all-cause death and individual first events of acute myocardial infarction (MI) , stroke, congestive heart failure (CHF), CV death, and all-cause death.
Measured: Baseline through End of Study (up to 7.5 years)
Total Number of Cardiovascular Hospitalisations and Cardiovascular Deaths
The total number of events for individual components of cardiovascular (CV) hospitalisations and cardiovascular deaths were recorded. MI, myocardial infarction.
Measured: Baseline through End of Study (up to 7.5 years)
Number of Participants With First Cardiovascular Hospitalisations/Cardiovascular Deaths by Stratum
Participants with first cardiovascular death (death due to cardiovascular causes or deaths with insufficient information to rule out a cardiovascular cause) and cardiovascular hospitalisation (hospitalisation for a cardiovascular event, excluding planned admissions not associated with a worsening of the disease/condition of the participant) were recorded by study stratum.
Measured: Baseline through End of Study (up to 7.5 years)
Number of Participants With CV/Microvascular Events
The number of participants with first cardiovascular or microvascular events (renal, foot, eye) were recorded.
Measured: Baseline through End of Study (up to 7.5 years)
Number of Participants With Glycaemic Failure Events
Failure of glycaemic control was defined as two consecutive HbA1c values of ≥8.5 percent, or HbA1c ≥8.5percent at a single visit, after which the subject was either moved to the post-randomised treatment phase or triple therapy was started.
Measured: Baseline through to end of randomised dual therapy
Number of Participants With Addition of Third Oral Agent/Switch to Insulin
The number of participants with addition of a third oral agent or switch to insulin from randomised dual combination treatment were recorded.
Measured: Baseline through End of Study (up to 7.5 years)
The Number of Participants Starting Insulin at Any Time During the Study
The number of participants starting insulin at any time during the study was recorded.
Measured: Baseline through End of Study (up to 7.5 years)
Model Adjusted Change From Baseline in HbA1c at Month 60
Model adjusted (adjusted for any imbalances in the baseline values between within stratum treatment groups) change from baseline in HbA1c was calculated as the value at Month 60 minus the Baseline value.
Measured: Baseline and Month 60 of randomised dual therapy treatment period
Model Adjusted Change From Baseline in Fasting Plasma Glucose at Month 60
Model adjusted (adjusted for any imbalances in the baseline values between within stratum treatment groups) change from baseline in fasting plasma glucose was calculated as the value at Month 60 minus the Baseline value.
Measured: Baseline to Month 60 of the randomised dual therapy treatment period
Model Adjusted Mean Change From Baseline in Insulin and Pro-insulin at Month 60
Model adjusted (adjusted for any imbalances in the baseline values between within stratum treatment groups) change from baseline in insulin and pro-insulin was calculated as the value at Month 60 minus the Baseline value.
Measured: Baseline to Month 60 of the randomised dual therapy treatment period
Number of HbA1c and Fasting Plasma Glucose (FPG) Responders at Month 60
Number of responders, i.e., participants meeting glycaemic targets (HbA1c less than or equal to 7 percent, FPG less than or equal to 7 mmol/L)
Measured: Baseline to Month 60 of the randomised dual therapy treatment period
Model Adjusted Ratio to Baseline (Expressed as a Percentage) Homeostasis Model Assessment (HOMA) Beta Cell Function and Insulin Sensitivity at Month 60
The model adjusted (adjusted for any imbalances in the baseline [BL] values between within stratum treatment groups) ratio to BL in HOMA beta-cell function and insulin sensitivity was calculated as the ratio of the Month 60 value to the BL value and was expressed as percent change from BL. For each treatment group, the model-adjusted mean change from BL at Month 60 was determined on the log scale. This mean was then back transformed to give a geometric mean (GM) of the ratio of the Month 60 value to BL on the original scale. The GM was expressed as a percentage (100*[GM^-1]).
Measured: Baseline to Month 60 of the randomised dual therapy treatment phase
Model Adjusted Ratio to Baseline (Expressed as a Percentage) for Total Cholesterol (TC), Low-density Lipoprotein (LDL) Cholesterol, High-density Lipoprotein (HDL) Cholesterol, Triglycerides, and Free Fatty Acids (FFAs) at Month 60
The model adjusted (adjusted for any imbalances in the baseline [BL] values between within stratum treatment groups) ratio to BL in TC, LDL cholesterol, HDL cholesterol, triglycerides, and FFAs was calculated as the ratio of the Month 60 value to the BL value and was expressed as percent change from BL. For each treatment group, the model-adjusted mean change from BL at Month 60 was determined on the log scale. This mean was then back transformed to give a geometric mean (GM) of the ratio of the Month 60 value to BL on the original scale. The GM was expressed as a percentage (100*[GM^-1]).
Measured: Baseline to Month 60 of the randomised dual therapy treatment phase
Model Adjusted Ratio to Baseline (Expressed as a Percentage) for Total Cholesterol (TC):High-density Lipoprotein (HDL) Cholesterol and Low-density Lipoprotein (LDL) Cholesterol:HDL Cholesterol Ratios at Month 60
The model adjusted (adjusted for any imbalances in the baseline [BL] values between within stratum treatment groups) ratio to BL in TC:HDL cholesterol and LDL cholesterol:HDL cholesterol was calculated as the ratio of the Month 60 value to the BL value and was expressed as percent change from BL. For each treatment group, the model-adjusted mean change from BL at Month 60 was determined on the log scale. This mean was then back transformed to give a geometric mean (GM) of the ratio of the Month 60 value to BL on the original scale. The GM was expressed as a percentage (100*[GM^-1]).
Measured: Baseline to Month 60 of the randomised dual therapy treatment period
Model Adjusted Ratio to Baseline (Expressed as a Percentage) for Apolipoprotein B (Apo-B) at Month 60
The model adjusted (adjusted for any imbalances in the baseline [BL] values between within stratum treatment groups) ratio to BL in Apo-B was calculated as the ratio of the Month 60 value to the BL value and was expressed as percent change from BL. For each treatment group, the model-adjusted mean change from BL at Month 60 was determined on the log scale. This mean was then back transformed to give a geometric mean (GM) of the ratio of the Month 60 value to BL on the original scale. The GM was expressed as a percentage (100*[GM^-1]).
Measured: Baseline to Month 60 of the randomised dual therapy treatment period
Model Adjusted Ratio to Baseline (Expressed as a Percentage) for Urinary Albumin Creatinine Ratio at Month 60
The model adjusted (adjusted for any imbalances in the baseline [BL] values between within stratum treatment groups) ratio to BL in urinary albumin creatinine ratio was calculated as the ratio of the Month 60 value to the BL value and was expressed as percent change from BL. For each treatment group, the model-adjusted mean change from BL at Month 60 was determined on the log scale. This mean was then back transformed to give a geometric mean (GM) of the ratio of the Month 60 value to BL on the original scale. The GM was expressed as a percentage (100*[GM^-1]).
Measured: Baseline to Month 60 of the randomised dual therapy treatment phase
Model Adjusted Change From Baseline in Body Weight at Month 60
Model adjusted (adjusted for any imbalances in the baseline values between within stratum treatment groups) change from baseline in body weight was calculated as the value at Month 60 minus the Baseline value.
Measured: Baseline to Month 60 of the randomised dual therapy treatment phase
Model Adjusted Change From Baseline in Alanine Aminotransferase at Month 60
Model adjusted (adjusted for any imbalances in the baseline values between within stratum treatment groups) change from baseline in alanine aminotransferase was calculated as the value at Month 60 minus the Baseline value.
Measured: Baseline to Month 60 of the randomised dual therapy treatment phase
Model Adjusted Change From Baseline in Waist Circumference at Month 60
Model adjusted (adjusted for any imbalances in the baseline values between within stratum treatment groups) change from baseline in waist circumference was calculated as the value at Month 60 minus the Baseline value.
Measured: Baseline to Month 60 of the randomised dual therapy treatment phase
Model Adjusted Change From Baseline in Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP) and Diastolic Blood Pressure (DBP) at Month 60
Model adjusted (adjusted for any imbalances in the baseline values between within treatment groups) change from baseline in SBP and DBP was calculated as the value at Month 60 minus the Baseline value.
Measured: Baseline to Month 60 of the randomised dual therapy treatment phase
Model Adjusted Ratio to Baseline (Expressed as a Percentage) for C-Reactive Protein at Month 60
The model adjusted (adjusted for any imbalances in the baseline [BL] values between within stratum treatment groups) ratio to BL in C-Reactive Protein was calculated as the ratio of the Month 60 value to the BL value and was expressed as percent change from BL. For each treatment group, the model-adjusted mean change from BL at Month 60 was determined on the log scale. This mean was then back transformed to give a geometric mean (GM) of the ratio of the Month 60 value to BL on the original scale. The GM was expressed as a percentage (100*[GM^-1]).
Measured: Baseline to Month 60 of the randomised dual therapy treatment phase
Model Adjusted Ratio to Baseline (Expressed as a Percentage) for Fibrinogen at Month 60
The model adjusted (adjusted for any imbalances in the baseline [BL] values between within stratum treatment groups) ratio to BL in fibrinogen was calculated as the ratio of the Month 60 value to the BL value and was expressed as percent change from BL. For each treatment group, the model-adjusted mean change from BL at Month 60 was determined on the log scale. This mean was then back transformed to give a geometric mean (GM) of the ratio of the Month 60 value to BL on the original scale. The GM was expressed as a percentage (100*[GM^-1]).
Measured: Baseline to Month 60 of the randomised dual therapy treatment phase
Model Adjusted Ratio to Baseline (Expressed as a Percentage) for Plasminogen Activator Inhibitor-1 (PAI-1) Antigen at Month 60
The model adjusted (adjusted for any imbalances in the baseline [BL] values between within stratum treatment groups) ratio to BL in plasminogen activator inhibitor-1 (PAI-1) antigen was calculated as the ratio of the Month 60 value to the BL value and was expressed as percent change from BL. For each treatment group, the model-adjusted mean change from BL at Month 60 was determined on the log scale. This mean was then back transformed to give a geometric mean (GM) of the ratio of the Month 60 value to BL on the original scale. The GM was expressed as a percentage (100*[GM^-1]).
Measured: Baseline to Month 60 of the randomised dual therapy treatment phase
Number of Participants With the Indicated Type of Neoplasm/Cancer Event Reported as a Serious Adverse Event (SAE) or Death: Main Study + Observational Follow-up Combined
The observational follow-up was designed to collect data concerning cancer and bone fractures in RECORD participants during a 4-year period after the end of the main RECORD study. At the end of the main study, all study medication was stopped. Participants were not provided with study medication in the observational follow-up; instead, anti-diabetic treatment was prescribed at the investigator's discretion. An SAE is defined as any event that is fatal; life threatening; disabling/incapacitating; results in hospitalization (excluding elective surgery or routine clinical procedures); prolongs a hospital stay; is associated with a congenital abnormality; cancer; is associated with an overdose. In addition, any event that the investigator regards as serious or that would suggest any significant hazard, contraindication, side effect, or precaution that may be associated with the study procedures should be reported as an SAE.
Measured: From the beginning of the main study through the end of the observational follow-up (up to 11.4 years)
Number of Participants With the Indicated Type of Neoplasm/Cancer Event Reported as a Serious Adverse Event (SAE) or Death: Observational Follow-up
The observational follow-up was designed to collect data concerning cancer and bone fractures in RECORD participants during a 4-year period after the end of the main RECORD study. At the end of the main study, all study medication was stopped. Participants were not provided with study medication in the observational follow-up; instead, anti-diabetic treatment was prescribed at the investigator's discretion. An SAE is defined as any event that is fatal; life threatening; disabling/incapacitating; results in hospitalization (excluding elective surgery or routine clinical procedures); prolongs a hospital stay; is associated with a congenital abnormality; cancer; is associated with an overdose. In addition, any event that the investigator regards as serious or that would suggest any significant hazard, contraindication, side effect, or precaution that may be associated with the study procedures should be reported as an SAE.
Measured: From the end of the RECORD study through the end of the observational follow-up (up to 4.0 years)
Number of Participants With the Indicated Type of Malignant Neoplasms/Cancer Events Reported as an SAE or Death by Location (Including Location of Special Interest): Main Study + Observational Follow-up Combined
The observational follow-up (OFU) was designed to collect data concerning cancer and bone fractures in RECORD participants during a 4-year period after the end of the main RECORD study. At the end of the main study, all study medication was stopped. Participants were not provided with study medication in the OFU. The neoplasms/cancer events of bladder, breast, colon, liver, pancreatic, prostate cancer, and melanoma were pre-specified as cancers of interest for the OFU. An SAE is defined as any event that is fatal; life threatening; disabling/incapacitating; results in hospitalization (excluding elective surgery or routine clinical procedures); prolongs a hospital stay; is associated with a congenital abnormality; cancer; is associated with an overdose. In addition, any event that the investigator regards as serious or that would suggest any significant hazard, contraindication, side effect, or precaution that may be associated with the study procedures should be reported as an SAE.
Measured: From the beginning of the main study through the end of the observational follow-up (up to 11.4 years)
Number of Participants With the Indicated Type of Malignant Neoplasms/Cancer Events Reported as an SAE or Death by Location (Including Location of Special Interest): Observational Follow-up
The observational follow-up (OFU) was designed to collect data concerning cancer and bone fractures in RECORD participants during a 4-year period after the end of the main RECORD study. At the end of the main study, all study medication was stopped. Participants were not provided with study medication in the OFU. The neoplasms/cancer events of bladder, breast, colon, liver, pancreatic, prostate cancer, and melanoma were pre-specified as cancers of interest for the OFU. An SAE is defined as any event that is fatal; life threatening; disabling/incapacitating; results in hospitalization (excluding elective surgery or routine clinical procedures); prolongs a hospital stay; is associated with a congenital abnormality; cancer; is associated with an overdose. In addition, any event that the investigator regards as serious or that would suggest any significant hazard, contraindication, side effect, or precaution that may be associated with the study procedures should be reported as an SAE.
Measured: From the end of the RECORD study through the end of the observational follow-up (up to 4.0 years)
Number of Participants Who Died Due to the Indicated Cancer-related Event: Main Study + Observational Follow-up Combined
The observational follow-up was designed to collect data concerning cancer and bone fractures in RECORD participants during a 4-year period after the end of the main RECORD study. At the end of the main study, all study medication was stopped. Participants were not provided with study medication in the observational follow-up; instead, anti-diabetic treatment was prescribed at the investigator's discretion. An SAE is defined as any event that is fatal; life threatening; disabling/incapacitating; results in hospitalization (excluding elective surgery or routine clinical procedures); prolongs a hospital stay; is associated with a congenital abnormality; cancer; is associated with an overdose. In addition, any event that the investigator regards as serious or that would suggest any significant hazard, contraindication, side effect, or precaution that may be associated with the study procedures should be reported as an SAE.
Measured: From the beginning of the main study through the end of the observational follow-up (up to 11.4 years)
Number of Participants Who Died Due to the Indicated Cancer-related Event: Observational Follow-up
The observational follow-up was designed to collect data concerning cancer and bone fractures in RECORD participants during a 4-year period after the end of the main RECORD study. At the end of the main study, all study medication was stopped. Participants were not provided with study medication in the observational follow-up; instead, anti-diabetic treatment was prescribed at the investigator's discretion. An SAE is defined as any event that is fatal; life threatening; disabling/incapacitating; results in hospitalization (excluding elective surgery or routine clinical procedures); prolongs a hospital stay; is associated with a congenital abnormality; cancer; is associated with an overdose. In addition, any event that the investigator regards as serious or that would suggest any significant hazard, contraindication, side effect, or precaution that may be associated with the study procedures should be reported as an SAE.
Measured: From the end of the RECORD study through the end of the observational follow-up (up to 4.0 years)
Number of Participants With a Bone Fracture Event - Overall and by Gender: Main Study and Observational Follow-up Combined
The observational follow-up was designed to collect data concerning cancer and bone fractures in RECORD participants during a 4-year period after the end of the main RECORD study. At the end of the main study, all study medication was stopped. Participants were not provided with study medication in the observational follow-up; instead, anti-diabetic treatment was prescribed at the investigator's discretion. A bone fracture event is defined as one or more fractured bones occurring on the same date and that had the same Higher Level Group Term (HLGT) for fracture location, per participant.
Measured: From the beginning of the main study through the end of the observational follow-up (up to 11.4 years)
Number of Participants With a Bone Fracture Event - Overall and by Gender: Observational Follow-up
The observational follow-up was designed to collect data concerning cancer and bone fractures in RECORD participants during a 4-year period after the end of the main RECORD study. At the end of the main study, all study medication was stopped. Participants were not provided with study medication in the observational follow-up; instead, anti-diabetic treatment was prescribed at the investigator's discretion. A bone fracture event is defined as one or more fractured bones occurring on the same date and that had the same Higher Level Group Term (HLGT) for fracture location, per participant.
Measured: From the end of the RECORD study through the end of the observational follow-up (up to 4.0 years)
Number of Participants With a Bone Fracture Event Reported as the Indicated Serious Adverse Event (by Higher Level Group Term) or Death: Main Study + Observational Follow-up Combined
The OFU was designed to collect data concerning cancer and bone fractures in RECORD participants during a 4-year period after the end of the main RECORD study. At the end of the main study, all study medication was stopped. Participants were not provided with study medication in the OFU. A bone fracture event is defined as one or more fractured bones occurring on the same date and that had the same Higher Level Group Term (HLGT) for fracture location, per participant. An SAE is defined as any event that is fatal; life threatening; disabling/incapacitating; results in hospitalization (excluding elective surgery or routine clinical procedures); prolongs a hospital stay; is associated with a congenital abnormality; cancer; is associated with an overdose. In addition, any event that the investigator regards as serious or that would suggest any significant hazard, contraindication, side effect, or precaution that may be associated with the study procedures should be reported as an SAE.
Measured: From the beginning of the main study through the end of the observational follow-up (up to 11.4 years)
Number of Participants With a Bone Fracture Event Reported as the Indicated Serious Adverse Event (by Higher Level Group Term) or Death: Observational Follow-up
The OFU was designed to collect data concerning cancer and bone fractures in RECORD participants during a 4-year period after the end of the main RECORD study. At the end of the main study, all study medication was stopped. Participants were not provided with study medication in the OFU. A bone fracture event is defined as one or more fractured bones occurring on the same date and that had the same Higher Level Group Term (HLGT) for fracture location, per participant. An SAE is defined as any event that is fatal; life threatening; disabling/incapacitating; results in hospitalization (excluding elective surgery or routine clinical procedures); prolongs a hospital stay; is associated with a congenital abnormality; cancer; is associated with an overdose. In addition, any event that the investigator regards as serious or that would suggest any significant hazard, contraindication, side effect, or precaution that may be associated with the study procedures should be reported as an SAE.
Measured: From the end of the RECORD study through the end of the observational follow-up (up to 4.0 years)
Number of Participants With an Event of Death Due to a Bone Fracture-related Event: Main Study + Observational Follow-up Combined
The observational follow-up was designed to collect data concerning cancer and bone fractures in RECORD participants during a 4-year period after the end of the main RECORD study. At the end of the main study, all study medication was stopped. Participants were not provided with study medication in the observational follow-up; instead, anti-diabetic treatment was prescribed at the investigator's discretion. A bone fracture event is defined as one or more fractured bones occurring on the same date and that had the same Higher Level Group Term (HLGT) for fracture location, per participant.
Measured: From the beginning of the main study through the end of the observational follow-up (up to 11.4 years)
Number of Participants With the Indicated Bone Fracture by Fracture Site: Main Study + Observational Follow-up Combined
The observational follow-up was designed to collect data concerning cancer and bone fractures in RECORD participants during a 4-year period after the end of the main RECORD study. At the end of the main study, all study medication was stopped. Participants were not provided with study medication in the observational follow-up; instead, anti-diabetic treatment was prescribed at the investigator's discretion. A bone fracture event is defined as one or more fractured bones occurring on the same date that had the same Higher Level Group Term (HLGT) for fracture location, per participant.
Measured: From the beginning of the main study through the end of the observational follow-up (up to 11.4 years)
Number of Participants With the Indicated Bone Fracture by Fracture Site: Observational Follow-up
The observational follow-up was designed to collect data concerning cancer and bone fractures in RECORD participants during a 4-year period after the end of the main RECORD study. At the end of the main study, all study medication was stopped. Participants were not provided with study medication in the observational follow-up; instead, anti-diabetic treatment was prescribed at the investigator's discretion. A bone fracture event is defined as one or more fractured bones occurring on the same date that had the same Higher Level Group Term (HLGT) for fracture location, per participant.
Measured: From the end of the RECORD study through the end of the observational follow-up (up to 4.0 years)
Number of Participants With Potentially High Morbidity Fractures: Main Study + Observational Follow-up Combined
The observational follow-up was designed to collect data concerning cancer and bone fractures in RECORD participants during a 4-year period after the end of the main RECORD study. At the end of the main study, all study medication was stopped. Participants were not provided with study medication in the observational follow-up; instead, anti-diabetic treatment was prescribed at the investigator's discretion. A bone fracture event is defined as one or more fractured bones occurring on the same date and that had the same Higher Level Group Term (HLGT) for fracture location, per participant. The following bone fractures were grouped and were identified as potentially high morbidity bone fractures: hip, pelvis, upper leg, vertebral (lumbar spine, thoracic spine, cervical spine, spine - site unknown).
Measured: From the beginning of the main study through the end of the observational follow-up (up to 11.4 years)
Number of Participants With Potentially High Morbidity Fracture Events and Non-high Morbidity Fracture Events, in Participants With Prior Hand/Upper Arm/Foot Fractures (H/UA/FF): Main Study + Observational Follow-up Combined
The observational follow-up was designed to collect data concerning cancer and bone fractures in RECORD participants during a 4-year period after the end of the main RECORD study. At the end of the main study, all study medication was stopped. Participants were not provided with study medication in the observational follow-up; instead, anti-diabetic treatment was prescribed at the investigator's discretion. A bone fracture event is defined as one or more fractured bones occurring on the same date and that had the same Higher Level Group Term (HLGT) for fracture location, per participant. The following bone fractures were grouped and were identified as potentially high morbidity bone fractures: hip, pelvis, upper leg, vertebral (lumbar spine, thoracic spine, cervical spine, spine - site unknown).
Measured: From the beginning of the main study through the end of the observational follow-up (up to 11.4 years)
Number of Participants With Bone Fracture Events of the Indicated Cause: Main Study + Observational Follow-up Combined
The observational follow-up was designed to collect data concerning cancer and bone fractures in RECORD participants during a 4-year period after the end of the main RECORD study. At the end of the main study, all study medication was stopped. Participants were not provided with study medication in the observational follow-up; instead, anti-diabetic treatment was prescribed at the investigator's discretion. A bone fracture event is defined as one or more fractured bones occurring on the same date and that had the same Higher Level Group Term (HLGT) for fracture location, per participant.
Measured: From the beginning of the main study through the end of the observational follow-up (up to 11.4 years)
Number of Participants With Bone Fracture Events of the Indicated Cause: Observational Follow-up
The observational follow-up was designed to collect data concerning cancer and bone fractures in RECORD participants during a 4-year period after the end of the main RECORD study. At the end of the main study, all study medication was stopped. Participants were not provided with study medication in the observational follow-up; instead, anti-diabetic treatment was prescribed at the investigator's discretion. A bone fracture event is defined as one or more fractured bones occurring on the same date and that had the same Higher Level Group Term (HLGT) for fracture location, per participant. The indicated fracture outcome was pre-specified in the CRF and included "Unknown" as a category. Fracture events with missing outcome data were reported as "Data unavailable."
Measured: From the end of the RECORD study through the end of the observational follow-up (up to 4.0 years)
Number of Bone Fracture Events With the Indicated Outcome: Main Study + Observational Follow-up Combined
The observational follow-up was designed to collect data concerning cancer and bone fractures in RECORD participants during a 4-year period after the end of the main RECORD study. At the end of the main study, all study medication was stopped. Participants were not provided with study medication in the observational follow-up; instead, anti-diabetic treatment was prescribed at the investigator's discretion. A bone fracture event is defined as one or more fractured bones occurring on the same date and that had the same Higher Level Group Term (HLGT) for fracture location, per participant. The indicated fracture outcome was pre-specified in the CRF and included "Unknown" as a category. Fracture events with missing outcome data were reported as "Data unavailable."
Measured: From the beginning of the main study through the end of the observational follow-up (up to 11.4 years)
Number of Bone Fracture Events With the Indicated Outcome: Observational Follow-up
The observational follow-up was designed to collect data concerning cancer and bone fractures in RECORD participants during a 4-year period after the end of the main RECORD study. At the end of the main study, all study medication was stopped. Participants were not provided with study medication in the observational follow-up; instead, anti-diabetic treatment was prescribed at the investigator's discretion. A bone fracture event is defined as one or more fractured bones occurring on the same date and that had the same Higher Level Group Term (HLGT) for fracture location, per participant. The indicated fracture outcome was pre-specified in the CRF and included "Unknown" as a category. Fracture events with missing outcome data were reported as "Data unavailable."
Measured: From the end of the RECORD study through the end of the observational follow-up (up to 4.0 years)
Number of Participants With the Indicated Serious Adverse Event: Observational Follow-up
The observational follow-up was designed to collect data concerning cancer and bone fractures in RECORD participants during a 4-year period after the end of the main RECORD study. At the end of the main study, all study medication was stopped. Participants were not provided with study medication in the observational follow-up; instead, anti-diabetic treatment was prescribed at the investigator's discretion. An SAE is defined as any event that is fatal; life threatening; disabling/incapacitating; results in hospitalization (excluding elective surgery or routine clinical procedures); prolongs a hospital stay; is associated with a congenital abnormality; cancer; is associated with an overdose. In addition, any event that the investigator regards as serious or that would suggest any significant hazard, contraindication, side effect, or precaution that may be associated with the study procedures should be reported as an SAE.
Measured: From the end of the RECORD study through the end of the observational follow-up (up to 4.0 years)
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted22 Sep 2006 (estimated)
- Study startApr 2001
- Primary completionDec 2008
- Study completionDec 2008
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Publications (7)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2Studies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by GlaxoSmithKlineThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 4,447 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- GlaxoSmithKline
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- GSK Clinical Trials, Study director, GlaxoSmithKline
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00379769
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- BRL-049653/231
- Acronym
- RECORD
- Status last verified
- Mar 2017
- First submitted
- 21 Sep 2006
- Last updated
- 23 Mar 2017
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- Individual data sharing
- Yes: Patient-level data for this study will be made available through www.clinicalstudydatarequest.com following the timelines and process described on this site.
Publications
Home PD, Jones NP, Pocock SJ, Beck-Nielsen H, Gomis R, Hanefeld M, Komajda M, Curtis P; RECORD Study Group. Rosiglitazone RECORD study: glucose control outcomes at 18 months. Diabet Med. 2007 Jun;24(6):626-34. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-5491.2007.02160.x.
PubMed 17517066Home PD, Pocock SJ, Beck-Nielsen H, Gomis R, Hanefeld M, Dargie H, Komajda M, Gubb J, Biswas N, Jones NP. Rosiglitazone Evaluated for Cardiac Outcomes and Regulation of Glycaemia in Diabetes (RECORD): study design and protocol. Diabetologia. 2005 Sep;48(9):1726-35. doi: 10.1007/s00125-005-1869-1. Epub 2005 Jul 16.
PubMed 16025252Home PD, Pocock SJ, Beck-Nielsen H, Gomis R, Hanefeld M, Jones NP, Komajda M, McMurray JJ; RECORD Study Group. Rosiglitazone evaluated for cardiovascular outcomes--an interim analysis. N Engl J Med. 2007 Jul 5;357(1):28-38. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa073394. Epub 2007 Jun 5.
PubMed 17551159Home PD, Pocock SJ, Beck-Nielsen H, Curtis PS, Gomis R, Hanefeld M, Jones NP, Komajda M, McMurray JJ; RECORD Study Team. Rosiglitazone evaluated for cardiovascular outcomes in oral agent combination therapy for type 2 diabetes (RECORD): a multicentre, randomised, open-label trial. Lancet. 2009 Jun 20;373(9681):2125-35. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(09)60953-3. Epub 2009 Jun 6.
PubMed 19501900Komajda M, Curtis P, Hanefeld M, Beck-Nielsen H, Pocock SJ, Zambanini A, Jones NP, Gomis R, Home PD; RECORD Study Group. Effect of the addition of rosiglitazone to metformin or sulfonylureas versus metformin/sulfonylurea combination therapy on ambulatory blood pressure in people with type 2 diabetes: a randomized controlled trial (the RECORD study). Cardiovasc Diabetol. 2008 Apr 24;7:10. doi: 10.1186/1475-2840-7-10.
PubMed 18435852Jones NP, Curtis PS, Home PD. Cancer and bone fractures in observational follow-up of the RECORD study. Acta Diabetol. 2015 Jun;52(3):539-46. doi: 10.1007/s00592-014-0691-y. Epub 2014 Dec 19.
PubMed 25524432MacDonald MR, Petrie MC, Home PD, Komajda M, Jones NP, Beck-Nielsen H, Gomis R, Hanefeld M, Pocock SJ, Curtis PS, McMurray JJ. Incidence and prevalence of unrecognized myocardial infarction in people with diabetes: a substudy of the Rosiglitazone Evaluated for Cardiac Outcomes and Regulation of Glycemia in Diabetes (RECORD) study. Diabetes Care. 2011 Jun;34(6):1394-6. doi: 10.2337/dc10-2398. Epub 2011 May 11.
PubMed 21562320
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 23 Mar 2017. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- A Long Term, Open Label, Randomised Study in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes, Comparing the Combination of Rosiglitazone and Either Metformin or Sulfonylurea With Metformin Plus Sulfonylurea on Cardiovascular Endpoints and Glycaemia
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00379769
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- RECORD / BRL-049653/231
- Conditions
- Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2
- Keywords
- diabetes, CV outcomes, rosiglitazone, Type II diabetes, sulfonylurea, RECORD, metformin
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 4,447 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- GlaxoSmithKlineIndustry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Study start
- Apr 2001
- Primary completion
- Dec 2008 (actual)
- Study completion
- Dec 2008 (actual)
- First posted
- 22 Sep 2006 (estimated)
- Results
- Posted 13 Nov 2009
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
This study is a phase 3b, multicentre, randomised, open label, parallel group study. A 4-week run-in period will be followed by a median of 6 years of treatment with study medication in addition to continuation of background glucose lowering therapy. Patients inadequately controlled on background metformin will be randomised to receive, in addition to metformin, either rosiglitazone or a sulfonylurea(glibenclamide, gliclazide or glimepiride) in a ratio of 1:1. Patients inadequately controlled on background SU will be randomised to receive, in addition to SU, either rosiglitazone or metformin in a ratio of 1:1. Equal numbers of patients receiving background metformin and SU at entry will be entered into the study.
Detailed description
A RECORD follow-up study is being performed to monitor the incidence of cancer and bone fractures in RECORD patients for a period of 4 years after the end of the main RECORD study (2008 - 2012).
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 4
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| rosiglitazone in addition to background metformin | Experimental | Drug: Rosiglitazone, Drug: MetforminParticipants inadequately controlled on background metformin (MET) were randomised to receive rosiglitazone (RSG), in addition to MET. RSG was initiated as a 4 mg once daily dose and was increased to a maximum dose of 8 mg per day as required to achieve a target HbA1c of less than or equal to 7.0 percent. |
| rosiglitazone in addition to background sulfonylurea | Experimental | Drug: Rosiglitazone, Drug: SulfonylureaParticipants inadequately controlled on background SU were randomised to receive, in addition to SU, RSG. RSG was initiated as a 4 mg once daily dose and was increased to a maximum dose of 8 mg per day as required to achieve a target HbA1c of less than or equal to 7.0 percent. |
| Sulfonylurea in addition to background metformin | Active comparator | Drug: Sulfonylurea, Drug: MetforminParticipants inadequately controlled on background MET were randomised to receive, in addition to MET, a sulfonylurea (SU) (glibenclamide, gliclazide, or glimepiride). The SU was gradually increased to the maximum permitted dose (glibenclamide 15 mg per day or miconizied equivalent of 10.5 mg per day; gliclazide 240 mg per day; glimepiride 4 mg per day) as required to achieve a target HbA1c of less than or equal to 7.0 percent. |
| Metformin in addition to background sulfonylurea | Active comparator | Drug: Sulfonylurea, Drug: MetforminParticipants inadequately controlled on background SU were randomised to receive, in addition to SU, MET. MET was gradually increased to the maximum permitted dose of 2550 mg per day as required to achieve a target HbA1c of less than or equal to 7.0 percent. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 40 to 75 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (4 listed)
- Patients with type II diabetes mellitus as defined by 1999 World Health Organisation criteria.
- Glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c) >7.0 % to = 9.0 % at visit 1.
- Use of an oral glucose lowering agent for a minimum of 6 months prior to screening and unchanged for 2 months prior to screening.
- Body mass index >25.0 kg/m2.
Key exclusion criteria (4 listed)
- Patients receiving any other glucose lowering therapy which is not metformin or a sulfonylurea.
- Patients with systolic blood pressure >180 mmHg or diastolic blood pressure >105 mmHg.
- Patients who have required the use of insulin for glycaemic control at any time in the past.
- Hospitalisation for any major cardiovascular event in the last 3 months.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| RosiglitazoneRosiglitazone maximum 8 mg per day | Drug | rosiglitazone in addition to background metformin, rosiglitazone in addition to background sulfonylurea |
| SulfonylureaSulfonylurea (SU) maximum permitted daily dose | Drug | Metformin in addition to background sulfonylurea, Sulfonylurea in addition to background metformin, rosiglitazone in addition to background sulfonylurea |
| MetforminMetformin maximum permitted daily dose . | Drug | Metformin in addition to background sulfonylurea, Sulfonylurea in addition to background metformin, rosiglitazone in addition to background metformin |
Primary outcome
Number of Participants With Cardiovascular Death/Cardiovascular Hospitalisation Events
Time frame: Baseline through End of Study (up to 7.5 years)
The number of participants with cardiovascular death events (death due to cardiovascular causes or deaths with insufficient information to rule out a cardiovascular cause) and cardiovascular hospitalisation events (hospitalisation for a cardiovascular event, excluding planned admissions not associated with a worsening of the disease/condition of the participant) was recorded.
Independent Re-adjudication Outcome: Number of Participants Who Died Due to Any Cause
Time frame: Baseline through End of Study (up to 7.5 years)
All deaths identified during the original record study and discovered after the re-adjudication efforts began were included.
Independent Re-adjudication (IR) Outcome: Number of Participants With a First Occurrence of a Major Adverse Cardiovascular Event (MACE) Defined as CV (or Unknown) Death, Non-fatal MI, and Non-fatal Stroke Based on Original RECORD Endpoint Definitions
Time frame: Baseline through End of Study (up to 7.5 years)
IR was based on original RECORD endpoint definitions. CV death= no unequivocal non-CV cause (sudden death, death from acute vascular events, heart failure, acute MI, other CV causes, and deaths adjudicated as unknown cause). MI event=hospitalization + elevation of specific cardiac biomarkers above the upper limit of normal + cardiac ischemia symptoms/new pathological electrocardiogram findings. Stroke event=hospitalization + rapidly developed clinical signs of focal/global disturbance of cerebral function for more than 24 hours, with no apparent cause other than a vascular origin.
Independent Re-adjudication Outcome: Number of Participants With a First Occurrence of a Major Adverse Cardiovascular Event (MACE) Defined as CV (or Unknown) Death, Non-fatal MI, and Non-fatal Stroke Based on Contemporary Endpoint Definitions
Time frame: Baseline through End of Study (up to 7.5 years)
Independent re-adjudication was based on the Standard Data Collection for Cardiovascular Trials Initiative (draft October 2011) endpoint definitions. CV death included death resulting from an acute MI; sudden cardiac death and death due to heart failure, stroke, and to other CV causes. Deaths of unknown cause were counted as CV deaths. MI was defined as evidence of myocardial necrosis in a clinical setting consistent with myocardial ischemia. Stroke was defined as an acute episode of neurological dysfunction caused by focal or global brain, spinal cord, or retinal vascular injury.
Independent Re-adjudication Outcome: Number of Participants With a CV (or Unknown) Death, Based on Original RECORD Endpoint Definitions
Time frame: Baseline through End of Study (up to 7.5 years)
The number of participants with a CV death (or unknown) as determined by independent re-adjudication using the original RECORD endpoint definitions was recorded. CV death was defined as any death for which an unequivocal non-CV cause could not be established. CV death included death following heart failure, death following acute myocardial infarction (MI), sudden death, death due to acute vascular events, and other CV causes. Deaths due to unknown causes were classified as "unknown deaths," but were counted as CV deaths for the analysis of this endpoint.
Independent Re-adjudication Outcome: Number of Participants With a CV (or Unknown) Death, Based on Contemporary Endpoint Definitions
Time frame: Baseline through End of Study (up to 7.5 years)
The number of participants with a CV (or unknown) death as determined by independent re-adjudication using the Standard Data Collection for Cardiovascular Trials Initiative (draft October 2011) endpoint definitions was recorded. CV death included death resulting from an acute myocardial infarction (MI), sudden cardiac death, death due to heart failure, death due to stroke, and death due to other CV causes. Deaths of unknown cause were counted as CV deaths.
Independent Re-adjudication Outcome: Number of Participants With an Event of Myocardial Infarction (Fatal and Non-fatal), Based on Original RECORD Endpoint Definitions
Time frame: Baseline through End of Study (up to 7.5 years)
The number of participants with an MI (fatal or non-fatal) event as determined by independent re-adjudication using the original RECORD endpoint definitions was recorded. An event of MI was defined as hospitalization plus elevation of cardiac biomarkers troponin (TN) I and/or TNT above the upper limit of normal (ULN) or creatinine kinase (CK) MB (M=muscle type; B=brain type) isoenzyme >= 2x the ULN or CK > 2x the ULN plus typical symptoms of cardiac ischemia or new pathological electrocardiogram findings, or cause of death adjudicated as MI.
Independent Re-adjudication Outcome: Number of Participants With an Event of Myocardial Infarction (Fatal and Non-fatal), Based on Contemporary Endpoint Definitions
Time frame: Baseline through End of Study (up to 7.5 years)
The number of participants with an MI (fatal or non-fatal) event as determined by independent re-adjudication using the Standard Data Collection for Cardiovascular Trials Initiative (draft October 2011) endpoint definitions was recorded. An event of MI was defined as evidence of myocardial necrosis in a clinical setting consistent with myocardial ischemia.
Independent Re-adjudication Outcome: Number of Participants (Par.) With an Event of Stroke (Fatal and Non-fatal), Based on Original RECORD Endpoint Definitions
Time frame: Baseline through End of Study (up to 7.5 years)
Par. with a stroke (fatal or non-fatal) event as determined by independent re-adjudication using the original RECORD endpoint definitions was recorded. A stroke event=hospitalization plus rapidly developed clinical signs of focal (or global) disturbance of cerebral function lasting more than 24 hours (unless interrupted by thrombolysis, surgery, or death), with no apparent cause other than a vascular origin, including par. presenting clinical signs/symptoms suggestive of subarachnoid haemorrhage/intracerebral haemorrhage/cerebral ischemic necrosis or cause of death adjudicated as stroke.
Independent Re-adjudication Outcome: Number of Participants With an Event of Stroke (Fatal and Non-fatal), Based on Contemporary Endpoint Definitions
Time frame: Baseline through End of Study (up to 7.5 years)
The number of participants with a stroke (fatal or non-fatal) event as determined by independent re-adjudication using the Standard Data Collection for Cardiovascular Trials Initiative (draft October 2011) endpoint definitions was recorded. An event of stroke was defined as an acute episode of neurological dysfunction caused by focal or global brain, spinal cord, or retinal vascular injury.
43 secondary outcomes
Number of Participants With Cardiovascular Events and All-cause Deaths
Time frame: Baseline through End of Study (up to 7.5 years)
Total Number of Cardiovascular Hospitalisations and Cardiovascular Deaths
Time frame: Baseline through End of Study (up to 7.5 years)
Number of Participants With First Cardiovascular Hospitalisations/Cardiovascular Deaths by Stratum
Time frame: Baseline through End of Study (up to 7.5 years)
Number of Participants With CV/Microvascular Events
Time frame: Baseline through End of Study (up to 7.5 years)
Number of Participants With Glycaemic Failure Events
Time frame: Baseline through to end of randomised dual therapy
Number of Participants With Addition of Third Oral Agent/Switch to Insulin
Time frame: Baseline through End of Study (up to 7.5 years)
The Number of Participants Starting Insulin at Any Time During the Study
Time frame: Baseline through End of Study (up to 7.5 years)
Model Adjusted Change From Baseline in HbA1c at Month 60
Time frame: Baseline and Month 60 of randomised dual therapy treatment period
Model Adjusted Change From Baseline in Fasting Plasma Glucose at Month 60
Time frame: Baseline to Month 60 of the randomised dual therapy treatment period
Model Adjusted Mean Change From Baseline in Insulin and Pro-insulin at Month 60
Time frame: Baseline to Month 60 of the randomised dual therapy treatment period
Number of HbA1c and Fasting Plasma Glucose (FPG) Responders at Month 60
Time frame: Baseline to Month 60 of the randomised dual therapy treatment period
Model Adjusted Ratio to Baseline (Expressed as a Percentage) Homeostasis Model Assessment (HOMA) Beta Cell Function and Insulin Sensitivity at Month 60
Time frame: Baseline to Month 60 of the randomised dual therapy treatment phase
Model Adjusted Ratio to Baseline (Expressed as a Percentage) for Total Cholesterol (TC), Low-density Lipoprotein (LDL) Cholesterol, High-density Lipoprotein (HDL) Cholesterol, Triglycerides, and Free Fatty Acids (FFAs) at Month 60
Time frame: Baseline to Month 60 of the randomised dual therapy treatment phase
Model Adjusted Ratio to Baseline (Expressed as a Percentage) for Total Cholesterol (TC):High-density Lipoprotein (HDL) Cholesterol and Low-density Lipoprotein (LDL) Cholesterol:HDL Cholesterol Ratios at Month 60
Time frame: Baseline to Month 60 of the randomised dual therapy treatment period
Model Adjusted Ratio to Baseline (Expressed as a Percentage) for Apolipoprotein B (Apo-B) at Month 60
Time frame: Baseline to Month 60 of the randomised dual therapy treatment period
Model Adjusted Ratio to Baseline (Expressed as a Percentage) for Urinary Albumin Creatinine Ratio at Month 60
Time frame: Baseline to Month 60 of the randomised dual therapy treatment phase
Model Adjusted Change From Baseline in Body Weight at Month 60
Time frame: Baseline to Month 60 of the randomised dual therapy treatment phase
Model Adjusted Change From Baseline in Alanine Aminotransferase at Month 60
Time frame: Baseline to Month 60 of the randomised dual therapy treatment phase
Model Adjusted Change From Baseline in Waist Circumference at Month 60
Time frame: Baseline to Month 60 of the randomised dual therapy treatment phase
Model Adjusted Change From Baseline in Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP) and Diastolic Blood Pressure (DBP) at Month 60
Time frame: Baseline to Month 60 of the randomised dual therapy treatment phase
Model Adjusted Ratio to Baseline (Expressed as a Percentage) for C-Reactive Protein at Month 60
Time frame: Baseline to Month 60 of the randomised dual therapy treatment phase
Model Adjusted Ratio to Baseline (Expressed as a Percentage) for Fibrinogen at Month 60
Time frame: Baseline to Month 60 of the randomised dual therapy treatment phase
Model Adjusted Ratio to Baseline (Expressed as a Percentage) for Plasminogen Activator Inhibitor-1 (PAI-1) Antigen at Month 60
Time frame: Baseline to Month 60 of the randomised dual therapy treatment phase
Number of Participants With the Indicated Type of Neoplasm/Cancer Event Reported as a Serious Adverse Event (SAE) or Death: Main Study + Observational Follow-up Combined
Time frame: From the beginning of the main study through the end of the observational follow-up (up to 11.4 years)
Number of Participants With the Indicated Type of Neoplasm/Cancer Event Reported as a Serious Adverse Event (SAE) or Death: Observational Follow-up
Time frame: From the end of the RECORD study through the end of the observational follow-up (up to 4.0 years)
Number of Participants With the Indicated Type of Malignant Neoplasms/Cancer Events Reported as an SAE or Death by Location (Including Location of Special Interest): Main Study + Observational Follow-up Combined
Time frame: From the beginning of the main study through the end of the observational follow-up (up to 11.4 years)
Number of Participants With the Indicated Type of Malignant Neoplasms/Cancer Events Reported as an SAE or Death by Location (Including Location of Special Interest): Observational Follow-up
Time frame: From the end of the RECORD study through the end of the observational follow-up (up to 4.0 years)
Number of Participants Who Died Due to the Indicated Cancer-related Event: Main Study + Observational Follow-up Combined
Time frame: From the beginning of the main study through the end of the observational follow-up (up to 11.4 years)
Number of Participants Who Died Due to the Indicated Cancer-related Event: Observational Follow-up
Time frame: From the end of the RECORD study through the end of the observational follow-up (up to 4.0 years)
Number of Participants With a Bone Fracture Event - Overall and by Gender: Main Study and Observational Follow-up Combined
Time frame: From the beginning of the main study through the end of the observational follow-up (up to 11.4 years)
Number of Participants With a Bone Fracture Event - Overall and by Gender: Observational Follow-up
Time frame: From the end of the RECORD study through the end of the observational follow-up (up to 4.0 years)
Number of Participants With a Bone Fracture Event Reported as the Indicated Serious Adverse Event (by Higher Level Group Term) or Death: Main Study + Observational Follow-up Combined
Time frame: From the beginning of the main study through the end of the observational follow-up (up to 11.4 years)
Number of Participants With a Bone Fracture Event Reported as the Indicated Serious Adverse Event (by Higher Level Group Term) or Death: Observational Follow-up
Time frame: From the end of the RECORD study through the end of the observational follow-up (up to 4.0 years)
Number of Participants With an Event of Death Due to a Bone Fracture-related Event: Main Study + Observational Follow-up Combined
Time frame: From the beginning of the main study through the end of the observational follow-up (up to 11.4 years)
Number of Participants With the Indicated Bone Fracture by Fracture Site: Main Study + Observational Follow-up Combined
Time frame: From the beginning of the main study through the end of the observational follow-up (up to 11.4 years)
Number of Participants With the Indicated Bone Fracture by Fracture Site: Observational Follow-up
Time frame: From the end of the RECORD study through the end of the observational follow-up (up to 4.0 years)
Number of Participants With Potentially High Morbidity Fractures: Main Study + Observational Follow-up Combined
Time frame: From the beginning of the main study through the end of the observational follow-up (up to 11.4 years)
Number of Participants With Potentially High Morbidity Fracture Events and Non-high Morbidity Fracture Events, in Participants With Prior Hand/Upper Arm/Foot Fractures (H/UA/FF): Main Study + Observational Follow-up Combined
Time frame: From the beginning of the main study through the end of the observational follow-up (up to 11.4 years)
Number of Participants With Bone Fracture Events of the Indicated Cause: Main Study + Observational Follow-up Combined
Time frame: From the beginning of the main study through the end of the observational follow-up (up to 11.4 years)
Number of Participants With Bone Fracture Events of the Indicated Cause: Observational Follow-up
Time frame: From the end of the RECORD study through the end of the observational follow-up (up to 4.0 years)
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 23 Mar 2017.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- Background: PubMed 17517066Home PD, Jones NP, Pocock SJ, Beck-Nielsen H, Gomis R, Hanefeld M, Komajda M, Curtis P; RECORD Study Group. Rosiglitazone RECORD study: glucose control outcomes at 18 months. Diabet Med. 2007 Jun;24(6):626-34. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-5491.2007.02160.x.
- Background: PubMed 16025252Home PD, Pocock SJ, Beck-Nielsen H, Gomis R, Hanefeld M, Dargie H, Komajda M, Gubb J, Biswas N, Jones NP. Rosiglitazone Evaluated for Cardiac Outcomes and Regulation of Glycaemia in Diabetes (RECORD): study design and protocol. Diabetologia. 2005 Sep;48(9):1726-35. doi: 10.1007/s00125-005-1869-1. Epub 2005 Jul 16.
- Background: PubMed 17551159Home PD, Pocock SJ, Beck-Nielsen H, Gomis R, Hanefeld M, Jones NP, Komajda M, McMurray JJ; RECORD Study Group. Rosiglitazone evaluated for cardiovascular outcomes--an interim analysis. N Engl J Med. 2007 Jul 5;357(1):28-38. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa073394. Epub 2007 Jun 5.
- Background: PubMed 19501900Home PD, Pocock SJ, Beck-Nielsen H, Curtis PS, Gomis R, Hanefeld M, Jones NP, Komajda M, McMurray JJ; RECORD Study Team. Rosiglitazone evaluated for cardiovascular outcomes in oral agent combination therapy for type 2 diabetes (RECORD): a multicentre, randomised, open-label trial. Lancet. 2009 Jun 20;373(9681):2125-35. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(09)60953-3. Epub 2009 Jun 6.
- Background: PubMed 18435852Komajda M, Curtis P, Hanefeld M, Beck-Nielsen H, Pocock SJ, Zambanini A, Jones NP, Gomis R, Home PD; RECORD Study Group. Effect of the addition of rosiglitazone to metformin or sulfonylureas versus metformin/sulfonylurea combination therapy on ambulatory blood pressure in people with type 2 diabetes: a randomized controlled trial (the RECORD study). Cardiovasc Diabetol. 2008 Apr 24;7:10. doi: 10.1186/1475-2840-7-10.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 25524432Jones NP, Curtis PS, Home PD. Cancer and bone fractures in observational follow-up of the RECORD study. Acta Diabetol. 2015 Jun;52(3):539-46. doi: 10.1007/s00592-014-0691-y. Epub 2014 Dec 19.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 21562320MacDonald MR, Petrie MC, Home PD, Komajda M, Jones NP, Beck-Nielsen H, Gomis R, Hanefeld M, Pocock SJ, Curtis PS, McMurray JJ. Incidence and prevalence of unrecognized myocardial infarction in people with diabetes: a substudy of the Rosiglitazone Evaluated for Cardiac Outcomes and Regulation of Glycemia in Diabetes (RECORD) study. Diabetes Care. 2011 Jun;34(6):1394-6. doi: 10.2337/dc10-2398. Epub 2011 May 11.
- Researchers can use this site to request access to anonymised patient level data and/or supporting documents from clinical studies to conduct further research.Link provided by the sponsor.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Yes. Patient-level data for this study will be made available through www.clinicalstudydatarequest.com following the timelines and process described on this site.
Related trials for Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2
Not yet recruitingPhase 3
Efficacy and Safety of Once-Weekly SHR-3167 Compared With Once-Daily Insulin Glargine in Adults With Insulin-Naive Type 2 Diabetes
Type 2 Diabetes
Active, not recruiting
Digital Reinforcement of Motivational Interviewing Micro-Skills Among Primary Care Healthcare Professionals
Hypertension (Without Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus)
Recruiting
Investigating Vascular Properties of HEMI and SPG Signals in Individuals With or at Risk for Chronic Kidney Disease
Chronic Kidney Disease, Hypertension (HTN)
Not yet recruitingPhase 3
A Study to Evaluate the Effectiveness and Safety of the Drug AZD6234 for Managing Weight in Adults Who Are Obese or Overweight. These Participants May or May Not Also Have Type 2 Diabetes
Obesity, Overweight
Not yet recruiting
Impact of Endoscopic Sleeve Gastroplasty (ESG) in Obese Adults With Type 2 Diabetes (T2D)
Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (T2D), Obesity (BMI>30)
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
GSK Clinical Trials study director
GlaxoSmithKline
446 sites in 25 countries: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 3 study testing Rosiglitazone, Sulfonylurea and Metformin in people with Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2, run by GlaxoSmithKline at 446 sites in 25 countries.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 4 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 23 Mar 2017. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 446 sites in France, United Kingdom, Germany, Italy, Sweden and 20 more countries. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 13 Nov 2009). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Number of Participants With Cardiovascular Death/Cardiovascular Hospitalisation Events (time frame: Baseline through End of Study (up to 7.5 years)). The study lists 10 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT00379769, which also lists 7 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 23 Mar 2017.