AzTrials
AzTrials

Hepatitis BPhase 4NCT00380614

A Randomized Controlled Trial of Lamivudine in Acute Hepatitis B

A Phase 4 study testing Lamivudine in people with Hepatitis B, run by Maulana Azad Medical College at 1 site in India.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Since a proportion of patients with Acute Viral Hepatitis-B develop severe hepatitis and fulminant hepatic failure, it is logical to believe that a rapid reduction in the HBV DNA levels by using antiviral agents could result in a less intense host response against the hepatitis B virus. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 5 to 75 years
Conditions the study is for
Hepatitis B
What is being tested?
Lamivudine
How many people
Not given
Where
1 siteIndia
Study dates
Jan 2002to Mar 2005
Phase
Phase 4
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 5 to 75 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Child, Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Diagnosis of acute hepatitis B
  • Bilirubin > 5 mg/dl at presentation.

Who cannot join

  • Patients with co-infection, a history of hepatotoxic drug intake or alcohol use >20g/day, or any evidence of chronic liver disease in the past, at presentation or during follow-up

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

India1 site
  • G.B. Pant Hospital

    New Delhi, National Capital Territory of Delhi, 110002

Other trials in India

About this study

Since a proportion of patients with Acute Viral Hepatitis-B develop severe hepatitis and fulminant hepatic failure, it is logical to believe that a rapid reduction in the HBV DNA levels by using antiviral agents could result in a less intense host response against the hepatitis B virus. However, the experience with lamivudine treatment of immunocompetent patients with AVH-B is limited.The aim of the present study was to evaluate the efficacy, utility and safety of lamivudine in treating immunocompetent patients with AVH-B.

Read the detailed description

The diagnosis of acute hepatitis B was based on recent onset acute illness including prodromal symptoms, jaundice and other typical symptoms. The laboratory investigations supporting the diagnosis of acute hepatitis included the presence of >2.5 times the upper limit of serum alanine aminotransferase (ALT) and serum bilirubin, and positive IgM anti-HBc test. Ultrasound, and esophagogastroduodenoscopy was done to look for any evidence of chronic liver disease. All patients had normal alpha-fetoprotein levels.

Co-infection with hepatitis A, C, D, E and human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection was looked for by appropriate serologic tests conducted within 7 days of presentation.

Patients with co-infection, a history of hepatotoxic drug intake or alcohol use >20g/day, or any evidence of chronic liver disease in the past, at presentation or during follow-up were excluded. Patients were also excluded if they had serum bilirubin < 5 mg/dl at presentation.

Patients were classified as severe AVH-B if they fulfilled any two of the following criteria: (1) hepatic encephalopathy; (2) serum bilirubin ≥10.0 mg/dl; and (3) international normalized ratio (INR) ≥1.6.

The patients were randomized into 2 groups: Group 1: Treatment with lamivudine 100 mg daily for 3 months, Group 2: Placebo. Randomization was done using random number table. The initial study and randomization was planned to enroll 120 patients or continue the study till three years, whichever was earlier. Individual rather than block randomization was done The investigators as well as the patients were blinded to the randomisation. The patients in the placebo group received a placebo pill.

All patients were monitored during treatment for clinical evidence and grade of hepatic encephalopathy, impaired coagulation (abnormal international normalized ratio, IINR), AST/ALT, serum albumin bilirubin levels every week for the first month and then monthly. HBV serology, including serum HBsAg, HBeAg, and anti-HBe were checked at baseline and every 3 months. Anti-HBs titres were checked at 6 and 12 months. Quantitative HBV DNA assay was performed on day 0, day 4, week 1, week 2, week 3, week 4, then every month for the next 2 months and then every 3 months for 12 months.

All patients were followed for at least 12 months after the onset of AVH-B. Development of protective anti-HBs(>10 IU/L) was specifically looked for.

Exacerbation of chronic hepatitis B was excluded by investigating thoroughly for any evidence of chronic liver disease by Ultrasound, Upper GI endoscopy, or low albumin at presentation. Ultrasound was repeated at 6 and 12 months, and if there was any suspicion Upper GI endoscopy was also repeated. LFTS were done at every hospital visit.

HBsAg, HBeAg, IgM anti-HBc, anti-HBs, and anti-HBe were tested by commercially available enzyme-linked immunoassays. Serum quantitative HBV DNA assay was performed by use of an ultra sensitive Hybrid capture assay [Digene Labs, USA] that has a lower limit of detection of 4,700 copies/ml. An arbitrary value of 4,700 copies/ml was assigned to values < 4,700 copies/ml for analysis purposes. In such patients HBV DNA was done by an in-house qualitative PCR test to indicate negativity or positivity of viral DNA. The lower limit of detection was 600 copies/ml.

Conditions
Hepatitis B
Being tested
Lamivudine
Keywords
Acute Hepatitis B, Lamivudine
Medical subject headings
Hepatitis B

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. clinical improvement

  2. biochemical improvement

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted26 Sep 2006 (estimated)
  2. Study startJan 2002
  3. Study completionMar 2005

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 4
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Double blind
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT00380614
Sponsor's protocol ID
Ethical/Path/GBPH/805
Status last verified
Sep 2006
First submitted
25 Sep 2006
Last updated
26 Sep 2006
Results posted
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 4 study testing Lamivudine in people with Hepatitis B, run by Maulana Azad Medical College at 1 site in India.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 26 Sep 2006. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in India. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this phase mean?

Phase 4 studies take place after a treatment is approved, to learn more about its long-term benefits and risks in everyday use.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

clinical improvement. The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 26 Sep 2006.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in