Hepatitis BPhase 4NCT00380614
A Randomized Controlled Trial of Lamivudine in Acute Hepatitis B
A Phase 4 study testing Lamivudine in people with Hepatitis B, run by Maulana Azad Medical College at 1 site in India.
Trial summary
Since a proportion of patients with Acute Viral Hepatitis-B develop severe hepatitis and fulminant hepatic failure, it is logical to believe that a rapid reduction in the HBV DNA levels by using antiviral agents could result in a less intense host response against the hepatitis B virus. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 5 to 75 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Hepatitis B
- What is being tested?
- Lamivudine
- How many people
- Not given
- Where
- 1 siteIndia
- Study dates
- Jan 2002to Mar 2005
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 5 to 75 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Child, Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Diagnosis of acute hepatitis B
- Bilirubin > 5 mg/dl at presentation.
Who cannot join
- Patients with co-infection, a history of hepatotoxic drug intake or alcohol use >20g/day, or any evidence of chronic liver disease in the past, at presentation or during follow-up
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
India1 site
G.B. Pant Hospital
New Delhi, National Capital Territory of Delhi, 110002
About this study
Since a proportion of patients with Acute Viral Hepatitis-B develop severe hepatitis and fulminant hepatic failure, it is logical to believe that a rapid reduction in the HBV DNA levels by using antiviral agents could result in a less intense host response against the hepatitis B virus. However, the experience with lamivudine treatment of immunocompetent patients with AVH-B is limited.The aim of the present study was to evaluate the efficacy, utility and safety of lamivudine in treating immunocompetent patients with AVH-B.
Read the detailed description
The diagnosis of acute hepatitis B was based on recent onset acute illness including prodromal symptoms, jaundice and other typical symptoms. The laboratory investigations supporting the diagnosis of acute hepatitis included the presence of >2.5 times the upper limit of serum alanine aminotransferase (ALT) and serum bilirubin, and positive IgM anti-HBc test. Ultrasound, and esophagogastroduodenoscopy was done to look for any evidence of chronic liver disease. All patients had normal alpha-fetoprotein levels.
Co-infection with hepatitis A, C, D, E and human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection was looked for by appropriate serologic tests conducted within 7 days of presentation.
Patients with co-infection, a history of hepatotoxic drug intake or alcohol use >20g/day, or any evidence of chronic liver disease in the past, at presentation or during follow-up were excluded. Patients were also excluded if they had serum bilirubin < 5 mg/dl at presentation.
Patients were classified as severe AVH-B if they fulfilled any two of the following criteria: (1) hepatic encephalopathy; (2) serum bilirubin ≥10.0 mg/dl; and (3) international normalized ratio (INR) ≥1.6.
The patients were randomized into 2 groups: Group 1: Treatment with lamivudine 100 mg daily for 3 months, Group 2: Placebo. Randomization was done using random number table. The initial study and randomization was planned to enroll 120 patients or continue the study till three years, whichever was earlier. Individual rather than block randomization was done The investigators as well as the patients were blinded to the randomisation. The patients in the placebo group received a placebo pill.
All patients were monitored during treatment for clinical evidence and grade of hepatic encephalopathy, impaired coagulation (abnormal international normalized ratio, IINR), AST/ALT, serum albumin bilirubin levels every week for the first month and then monthly. HBV serology, including serum HBsAg, HBeAg, and anti-HBe were checked at baseline and every 3 months. Anti-HBs titres were checked at 6 and 12 months. Quantitative HBV DNA assay was performed on day 0, day 4, week 1, week 2, week 3, week 4, then every month for the next 2 months and then every 3 months for 12 months.
All patients were followed for at least 12 months after the onset of AVH-B. Development of protective anti-HBs(>10 IU/L) was specifically looked for.
Exacerbation of chronic hepatitis B was excluded by investigating thoroughly for any evidence of chronic liver disease by Ultrasound, Upper GI endoscopy, or low albumin at presentation. Ultrasound was repeated at 6 and 12 months, and if there was any suspicion Upper GI endoscopy was also repeated. LFTS were done at every hospital visit.
HBsAg, HBeAg, IgM anti-HBc, anti-HBs, and anti-HBe were tested by commercially available enzyme-linked immunoassays. Serum quantitative HBV DNA assay was performed by use of an ultra sensitive Hybrid capture assay [Digene Labs, USA] that has a lower limit of detection of 4,700 copies/ml. An arbitrary value of 4,700 copies/ml was assigned to values < 4,700 copies/ml for analysis purposes. In such patients HBV DNA was done by an in-house qualitative PCR test to indicate negativity or positivity of viral DNA. The lower limit of detection was 600 copies/ml.
- Conditions
- Hepatitis B
- Being tested
- Lamivudine
- Keywords
- Acute Hepatitis B, Lamivudine
- Medical subject headings
- Hepatitis B
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
LamivudineDrug
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
clinical improvement
biochemical improvement
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted26 Sep 2006 (estimated)
- Study startJan 2002
- Study completionMar 2005
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Hepatitis BStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Maulana Azad Medical College
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Investigators
- Shiv K Sarin, MD, DM, Principal investigator, G.B. Pant Hospital, New Delhi, India
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00380614
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- Ethical/Path/GBPH/805
- Status last verified
- Sep 2006
- First submitted
- 25 Sep 2006
- Last updated
- 26 Sep 2006
- Results posted
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 26 Sep 2006. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- A Randomized Controlled Trial of Lamivudine in Acute Hepatitis B
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00380614
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- Ethical/Path/GBPH/805
- Conditions
- Hepatitis B
- Keywords
- Acute Hepatitis B, Lamivudine
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Lead sponsor
- Maulana Azad Medical CollegeUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- Jan 2002
- Study completion
- Mar 2005
- First posted
- 26 Sep 2006 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Since a proportion of patients with Acute Viral Hepatitis-B develop severe hepatitis and fulminant hepatic failure, it is logical to believe that a rapid reduction in the HBV DNA levels by using antiviral agents could result in a less intense host response against the hepatitis B virus. However, the experience with lamivudine treatment of immunocompetent patients with AVH-B is limited.The aim of the present study was to evaluate the efficacy, utility and safety of lamivudine in treating immunocompetent patients with AVH-B.
Detailed description
The diagnosis of acute hepatitis B was based on recent onset acute illness including prodromal symptoms, jaundice and other typical symptoms. The laboratory investigations supporting the diagnosis of acute hepatitis included the presence of >2.5 times the upper limit of serum alanine aminotransferase (ALT) and serum bilirubin, and positive IgM anti-HBc test. Ultrasound, and esophagogastroduodenoscopy was done to look for any evidence of chronic liver disease. All patients had normal alpha-fetoprotein levels.
Co-infection with hepatitis A, C, D, E and human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection was looked for by appropriate serologic tests conducted within 7 days of presentation.
Patients with co-infection, a history of hepatotoxic drug intake or alcohol use >20g/day, or any evidence of chronic liver disease in the past, at presentation or during follow-up were excluded. Patients were also excluded if they had serum bilirubin < 5 mg/dl at presentation.
Patients were classified as severe AVH-B if they fulfilled any two of the following criteria: (1) hepatic encephalopathy; (2) serum bilirubin ≥10.0 mg/dl; and (3) international normalized ratio (INR) ≥1.6.
The patients were randomized into 2 groups: Group 1: Treatment with lamivudine 100 mg daily for 3 months, Group 2: Placebo. Randomization was done using random number table. The initial study and randomization was planned to enroll 120 patients or continue the study till three years, whichever was earlier. Individual rather than block randomization was done The investigators as well as the patients were blinded to the randomisation. The patients in the placebo group received a placebo pill.
All patients were monitored during treatment for clinical evidence and grade of hepatic encephalopathy, impaired coagulation (abnormal international normalized ratio, IINR), AST/ALT, serum albumin bilirubin levels every week for the first month and then monthly. HBV serology, including serum HBsAg, HBeAg, and anti-HBe were checked at baseline and every 3 months. Anti-HBs titres were checked at 6 and 12 months. Quantitative HBV DNA assay was performed on day 0, day 4, week 1, week 2, week 3, week 4, then every month for the next 2 months and then every 3 months for 12 months.
All patients were followed for at least 12 months after the onset of AVH-B. Development of protective anti-HBs(>10 IU/L) was specifically looked for.
Exacerbation of chronic hepatitis B was excluded by investigating thoroughly for any evidence of chronic liver disease by Ultrasound, Upper GI endoscopy, or low albumin at presentation. Ultrasound was repeated at 6 and 12 months, and if there was any suspicion Upper GI endoscopy was also repeated. LFTS were done at every hospital visit.
HBsAg, HBeAg, IgM anti-HBc, anti-HBs, and anti-HBe were tested by commercially available enzyme-linked immunoassays. Serum quantitative HBV DNA assay was performed by use of an ultra sensitive Hybrid capture assay [Digene Labs, USA] that has a lower limit of detection of 4,700 copies/ml. An arbitrary value of 4,700 copies/ml was assigned to values < 4,700 copies/ml for analysis purposes. In such patients HBV DNA was done by an in-house qualitative PCR test to indicate negativity or positivity of viral DNA. The lower limit of detection was 600 copies/ml.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 5 to 75 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Child, Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (2 listed)
- Diagnosis of acute hepatitis B
- Bilirubin > 5 mg/dl at presentation.
Key exclusion criteria (1 listed)
- Patients with co-infection, a history of hepatotoxic drug intake or alcohol use >20g/day, or any evidence of chronic liver disease in the past, at presentation or during follow-up
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Lamivudine | Drug | – |
Primary outcome
clinical improvement
biochemical improvement
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 26 Sep 2006.
Related trials for Hepatitis B
Active, not recruitingPhase 2
A Study of Sequential Therapy With Daplusiran/Tomligisiran (DAP/TOM) Followed by Bepirovirsen in Participants Living With Chronic Hepatitis B (CHB)
Chronic Hepatitis B Virus Infection, Hepatitis B
RecruitingObservational study
Evaluation of Patients With Liver Disease
Hepatitis D, Hepatitis C
Active, not recruitingPhase 2
Study of Bepirovirsen in Participants Living With Human Immunodeficiency Virus and Chronic Hepatitis B Virus Infection (B-Focus)
Hepatitis B
Active, not recruitingPhase 2
Long-term Follow-up Study to Evaluate Durability of Treatment Response in Previous Bepirovirsen Study Participants (B-Sure)
Hepatitis B
Enrolling by invitationPhase 1
A Phase I Clinical Trial of CPU-YL01 Injection in Patients With Chronic Hepatitis B.
Chronic Hepatitis B
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Shiv K Sarin, MD, DM principal investigator
G.B. Pant Hospital, New Delhi, India
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 4 study testing Lamivudine in people with Hepatitis B, run by Maulana Azad Medical College at 1 site in India.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 26 Sep 2006. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in India. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 4 studies take place after a treatment is approved, to learn more about its long-term benefits and risks in everyday use.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
clinical improvement. The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 26 Sep 2006.