Coronary Artery DiseasePhase 3C-SIRIUSNCT00381420
The Study of the BX Velocity Stent in the Treatment of De Novo Artery Lesions.
A Phase 3 study testing drug-eluting stent and bare-metal stent in people with Coronary Artery Disease, run by Cordis US Corp..
Trial summary
The main objective of this study is to assess the safety and effectiveness of the sirolimus-coated Bx VELOCITY™ stent in maintaining minimum lumen diameter in de novo native coronary artery lesions as compared to the uncoated Bx VELOCITY™ balloon-expandable stent. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Coronary Artery Disease
- What is being tested?
- drug-eluting stent and bare-metal stent
- Type of treatment
- Medical device
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 100 participants
- Where
- No sites listed yet
- Study dates
- Mar 2001to Jun 2008
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Diagnosis of angina pectoris as defined by Canadian Cardiovascular Society Classification (CCS I, II, III, IV) OR unstable angina pectoris (Braunwald Classification B\&C, I-II) OR patients with documented silent ischemia;
- Single treatment of de novo lesion in a major coronary artery in patients with single or multi-vessel disease; patients with multiple lesions can be included only if the other lesions do not require treatment;
- Target vessel diameter at the lesion site is >=2.50mm and <=3.0mm in diameter (visual estimate);
- Target lesion is >=15mm and <=32mm in length (visual estimate);
- Target lesion stenosis is >50% and <100% (visual estimate);
Who cannot join
- Patient has experienced a Q-wave or non-Q-wave myocardial infarction with documented total CK >2 times normal within the preceding 24 hours and the CK and CK-MB enzymes remains above normal at the time of treatment;
- Has unstable angina classified as Braunwald III B or C and A I-II-III, or is having a peri infarction;
- Unprotected left main coronary disease with >=50% stenosis;
- Significant (>50%) stenoses proximal or distal to the target lesion that might require revascularization or impede runoff;
- Have an ostial target lesion;
- Angiographic evidence of thrombus within target lesion;
- Heavily calcified lesion which cannot be successfully predilated;
- Documented left ventricular ejection fraction <=25%.
About this study
Official title: A Canadian Multi-Center, Randomized, Double-Blind Study of the Sirolimus-Coated BX Velocity Balloon-Expandable Stent in the Treatment of Patients With de Novo Coronary Artery Lesions.
The main objective of this study is to assess the safety and effectiveness of the sirolimus-coated Bx VELOCITY™ stent in maintaining minimum lumen diameter in de novo native coronary artery lesions as compared to the uncoated Bx VELOCITY™ balloon-expandable stent. Both stents are mounted on the Raptor® Stent Delivery Systems.
The secondary objective is to assess cost-effectiveness expressed in incremental cost/life year gained or cost/quality adjusted life year gained at different time points (8 months, 1 year, 3 and 5 years).
Read the detailed description
This is a multicenter ,prospective, randomized double blind study. This study has a 2-arm design assessing the safety and effectiveness of the sirolimus-coated Bx VELOCITY™ stent to the uncoated Bx VELOCITY™ stent, both mounted on Raptor® Stent Delivery Systems. A total of 100 patients will be entered in the study and will be randomized on a 1:1 basis. Patients who meet the eligibility criteria will be either randomized to Treatment A or Treatment B. Neither the investigator nor the patient will know which stent will be implanted. Patients will be followed at 30 days, 6, 9, and 12 months, and at 2, 3, 4 and 5 years post-procedure, with all patients undergoing repeat angiography at 8 months. Additionally, medical costs associated with the index hospitalization and length of stay, and repeat hospitalizations and costs associated with other relevant medical resource use during the 5 years follow-up period will be collected and analyzed.
- Conditions
- Coronary Artery Disease
- Being tested
- drug-eluting stent, bare-metal stent
- Medical subject headings
- Coronary Artery Disease
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
drug-eluting stentDevice
sirolimus-coated Bx VELOCITY Balloon-Expandable Stent
bare-metal stentDevice
un-coated Bx VELOCITY Stent
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Experimental | sirolimus-coated Bx Velocity stent Receives: Device: drug-eluting stent |
| 2 | Active comparator | uncoated Bx Velocity stent Receives: Device: bare-metal stent |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
in-stent minimum lumen diameter (MLD)
Measured: 8 months
Secondary outcomes (7)
composite of Major Adverse Cardiac Events defined as death, myocardial infarction (Q wave and non-Q wave), emergent bypass surgery, or repeat target lesion revascularization
Measured: 30 days and 6, 9, and 12 months, and 2, 3, 4 and 5 years
angiographic binary restenosis (³50% diameter stenosis)
Measured: 8 months
in-lesion MLD
Measured: 8 months
target lesion revascularization
Measured: 9 months
target vessel revascularization
Measured: 9 months
target vessel failure defined as cardiac death, myocardial infarction, or target vessel revascularization
Measured: 9 months
procedure success defined as achievement of a final diameter stenosis of <50% (by QCA) using any percutaneous method, without the occurrence of death, MI, or repeat revascularization of the target lesion
Measured: up to hospital discharge
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted27 Sep 2006 (estimated)
- Study startMar 2001
- Primary completionDec 2002
- Study completionJun 2008
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (3)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Coronary Artery DiseaseStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Investigator
- Enrolment
- 100 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Cordis US Corp.
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Investigators
- Erick Schampaert, MD, Principal investigator, Hopital Sacreé-Coeur, Montréal, Canada
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00381420
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- P01-6307
- Acronym
- C-SIRIUS
- Status last verified
- Oct 2008
- First submitted
- 26 Sep 2006
- Last updated
- 31 Oct 2008
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
Publications
Schampaert E, Cohen EA, Schluter M, Reeves F, Traboulsi M, Title LM, Kuntz RE, Popma JJ; C-SIRIUS Investigators. The Canadian study of the sirolimus-eluting stent in the treatment of patients with long de novo lesions in small native coronary arteries (C-SIRIUS). J Am Coll Cardiol. 2004 Mar 17;43(6):1110-5. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2004.01.024.
PubMed 15028375Rinfret S, Cohen DJ, Tahami Monfared AA, Lelorier J, Mireault J, Schampaert E. Cost effectiveness of the sirolimus-eluting stent in high-risk patients in Canada: an analysis from the C-SIRIUS trial. Am J Cardiovasc Drugs. 2006;6(3):159-68. doi: 10.2165/00129784-200606030-00003.
PubMed 16780389Spaulding C, Daemen J, Boersma E, Cutlip DE, Serruys PW. A pooled analysis of data comparing sirolimus-eluting stents with bare-metal stents. N Engl J Med. 2007 Mar 8;356(10):989-97. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa066633. Epub 2007 Feb 12.
PubMed 17296825
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 31 Oct 2008. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- A Canadian Multi-Center, Randomized, Double-Blind Study of the Sirolimus-Coated BX Velocity Balloon-Expandable Stent in the Treatment of Patients With de Novo Coronary Artery Lesions.
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00381420
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- C-SIRIUS / P01-6307
- Conditions
- Coronary Artery Disease
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 100 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Cordis US Corp.Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Study start
- Mar 2001
- Primary completion
- Dec 2002 (actual)
- Study completion
- Jun 2008 (actual)
- First posted
- 27 Sep 2006 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The main objective of this study is to assess the safety and effectiveness of the sirolimus-coated Bx VELOCITY™ stent in maintaining minimum lumen diameter in de novo native coronary artery lesions as compared to the uncoated Bx VELOCITY™ balloon-expandable stent. Both stents are mounted on the Raptor® Stent Delivery Systems.
The secondary objective is to assess cost-effectiveness expressed in incremental cost/life year gained or cost/quality adjusted life year gained at different time points (8 months, 1 year, 3 and 5 years).
Detailed description
This is a multicenter ,prospective, randomized double blind study. This study has a 2-arm design assessing the safety and effectiveness of the sirolimus-coated Bx VELOCITY™ stent to the uncoated Bx VELOCITY™ stent, both mounted on Raptor® Stent Delivery Systems. A total of 100 patients will be entered in the study and will be randomized on a 1:1 basis. Patients who meet the eligibility criteria will be either randomized to Treatment A or Treatment B. Neither the investigator nor the patient will know which stent will be implanted. Patients will be followed at 30 days, 6, 9, and 12 months, and at 2, 3, 4 and 5 years post-procedure, with all patients undergoing repeat angiography at 8 months. Additionally, medical costs associated with the index hospitalization and length of stay, and repeat hospitalizations and costs associated with other relevant medical resource use during the 5 years follow-up period will be collected and analyzed.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind (participant, investigator)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Experimental | Device: drug-eluting stentsirolimus-coated Bx Velocity stent |
| 2 | Active comparator | Device: bare-metal stentuncoated Bx Velocity stent |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (5 listed)
- Diagnosis of angina pectoris as defined by Canadian Cardiovascular Society Classification (CCS I, II, III, IV) OR unstable angina pectoris (Braunwald Classification B\&C, I-II) OR patients with documented silent ischemia;
- Single treatment of de novo lesion in a major coronary artery in patients with single or multi-vessel disease; patients with multiple lesions can be included only if the other lesions do not require treatment;
- Target vessel diameter at the lesion site is >=2.50mm and <=3.0mm in diameter (visual estimate);
- Target lesion is >=15mm and <=32mm in length (visual estimate);
- Target lesion stenosis is >50% and <100% (visual estimate);
Key exclusion criteria (8 listed)
- Patient has experienced a Q-wave or non-Q-wave myocardial infarction with documented total CK >2 times normal within the preceding 24 hours and the CK and CK-MB enzymes remains above normal at the time of treatment;
- Has unstable angina classified as Braunwald III B or C and A I-II-III, or is having a peri infarction;
- Unprotected left main coronary disease with >=50% stenosis;
- Significant (>50%) stenoses proximal or distal to the target lesion that might require revascularization or impede runoff;
- Have an ostial target lesion;
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| drug-eluting stentsirolimus-coated Bx VELOCITY Balloon-Expandable Stent | Device | 1 |
| bare-metal stentun-coated Bx VELOCITY Stent | Device | 2 |
Primary outcome
in-stent minimum lumen diameter (MLD)
Time frame: 8 months
7 secondary outcomes
composite of Major Adverse Cardiac Events defined as death, myocardial infarction (Q wave and non-Q wave), emergent bypass surgery, or repeat target lesion revascularization
Time frame: 30 days and 6, 9, and 12 months, and 2, 3, 4 and 5 years
angiographic binary restenosis (³50% diameter stenosis)
Time frame: 8 months
in-lesion MLD
Time frame: 8 months
target lesion revascularization
Time frame: 9 months
target vessel revascularization
Time frame: 9 months
target vessel failure defined as cardiac death, myocardial infarction, or target vessel revascularization
Time frame: 9 months
procedure success defined as achievement of a final diameter stenosis of <50% (by QCA) using any percutaneous method, without the occurrence of death, MI, or repeat revascularization of the target lesion
Time frame: up to hospital discharge
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 31 Oct 2008.
- Results publication: PubMed 15028375Schampaert E, Cohen EA, Schluter M, Reeves F, Traboulsi M, Title LM, Kuntz RE, Popma JJ; C-SIRIUS Investigators. The Canadian study of the sirolimus-eluting stent in the treatment of patients with long de novo lesions in small native coronary arteries (C-SIRIUS). J Am Coll Cardiol. 2004 Mar 17;43(6):1110-5. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2004.01.024.
- Results publication: PubMed 16780389Rinfret S, Cohen DJ, Tahami Monfared AA, Lelorier J, Mireault J, Schampaert E. Cost effectiveness of the sirolimus-eluting stent in high-risk patients in Canada: an analysis from the C-SIRIUS trial. Am J Cardiovasc Drugs. 2006;6(3):159-68. doi: 10.2165/00129784-200606030-00003.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 17296825Spaulding C, Daemen J, Boersma E, Cutlip DE, Serruys PW. A pooled analysis of data comparing sirolimus-eluting stents with bare-metal stents. N Engl J Med. 2007 Mar 8;356(10):989-97. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa066633. Epub 2007 Feb 12.
Related trials for Coronary Artery Disease
Not yet recruiting
Effect of Stress Ball Use During Femoral Arterial Sheath Removal After Coronary Angiography
Femoral Arterial Sheath Removal, Stress Ball
Active, not recruiting
Shockwave™ vs Surgical Endarterectomy for Calcified Severe Common Femoral Artery Stenosis: Comparison of Efficacy, Safety and Long-Term Outcomes
Common Femoral Artery Stenosis, Calcification; Heart
Not yet recruitingPhase 4
Roxadustat and Myocardial Injury After Off-Pump Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery
Coronary Artery Disease, Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting
RecruitingObservational study
Preoperative Gastric Ultrasound and Left Ventricular Function in Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery
Coronary Artery Disease, Left Ventricular Systolic Dysfunction
Active, not recruiting
The OCTOBER Trial - European Trial on Optical Coherence Tomography Optimized Bifurcation Event Reduction (OCTOBER)
Ischaemic Heart Disease, Ischemic Heart Disease
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Erick Schampaert, MD principal investigator
Hopital Sacreé-Coeur, Montréal, Canada
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 3 study testing drug-eluting stent and bare-metal stent in people with Coronary Artery Disease, run by Cordis US Corp..
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 8 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 31 Oct 2008. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
in-stent minimum lumen diameter (MLD) (time frame: 8 months). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT00381420, which also lists 3 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 31 Oct 2008.