AzTrials
AzTrials

Childhood Cerebral Anaplastic AstrocytomaPhase 2NCT00381797

Bevacizumab and Irinotecan in Treating Young Patients With Recurrent, Progressive, or Refractory Glioma, Medulloblastoma, Ependymoma, or Low Grade Glioma

A Phase 2 study testing Bevacizumab, Fludeoxyglucose F-18 and Irinotecan Hydrochloride in people with Childhood Cerebral Anaplastic Astrocytoma and Childhood Oligodendroglioma, run by National Cancer Institute (NCI) at 11 sites in United States.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

This phase II trial is studying how well giving bevacizumab together with irinotecan works in treating young patients with recurrent, progressive, or refractory glioma, medulloblastoma, ependymoma, or low grade glioma. Monoclonal antibodies, such as bevacizumab, can block tumor growth in different ways. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages Up to 21 years
What is being tested?
Bevacizumab, Fludeoxyglucose F-18 and Irinotecan Hydrochloride
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
97 participants
Where
11 sitesUnited States
Study dates
Aug 2006to Oct 2015
Phase
Phase 2
Are there results?
Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages Up to 21 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Child, Adult

Who may be able to join

  • Histologically confirmed high-grade glioma (WHO grade III or IV) at any site within the brain, including the following:
  • Anaplastic astrocytoma
  • Glioblastoma multiforme (including giant cell and gliosarcoma subtypes)
  • Anaplastic oligodendroglioma
  • Anaplastic ganglioglioma
  • Anaplastic oligoastrocytoma
Show all 61Show fewer
  • Diffuse brain stem glioma
  • Histologic confirmation not required
  • Histologically confirmed medulloblastoma
  • Histologically confirmed ependymoma
  • Primary spinal cord malignant glioma with measurable metastatic disease within the brain
  • Histologic confirmation required
  • Neuraxis dissemination allowed provided there is bidimensionally measurable disease within the brain and spinal cord
  • Low grade glioma at any site within the brain with or without spinal cord disease
  • Recurrent, progressive, or refractory disease (must have received prior chemoradiotherapy)
  • No more than 2 prior chemotherapy regimens following relapse
  • Bidimensionally measurable disease, defined as ≥ 1 lesion that can be accurately measured in ≥ 2 planes
  • If there is spinal cord disease as well, response assessment will be based only upon the measurable tumor in the brain
  • No diffuse gliomatosis cerebri with < 1 discrete, measurable lesion
  • No evidence of new symptomatic CNS hemorrhage (> grade 2) within the past 2 weeks
  • No central non-cerebellar PNET's (e.g., cerebral PNET or pineoblastoma)
  • No spinal cord tumors only
  • Karnofsky performance status (PS) 50-100% (> 16 years of age) OR Lansky PS 50-100% (≤ 16 years of age)
  • Absolute neutrophil count ≥ 1,500/mm³ (unsupported)
  • Platelet count ≥ 100,000/mm³ (unsupported)
  • Hemoglobin > 8 g/dL (support allowed)
  • Creatinine normal
  • BUN < 25 mg/dL
  • Bilirubin ≤ 1.5 times upper limit of normal (ULN)
  • ALT and AST ≤ 3 times ULN
  • Neurological deficits must be stable for ≥ 1 week prior to study entry
  • No active renal, cardiac (congestive cardiac failure, myocarditis), or pulmonary disease
  • Not pregnant or nursing
  • Negative pregnancy test
  • Fertile patients must use effective contraception during and for ≥ 6 months after completion of study treatment
  • No clinically significant unrelated systemic illness that would preclude study treatment, including any of the following:
  • Serious infections
  • Significant cardiac, pulmonary, hepatic, or other organ dysfunction
  • No uncontrolled systemic hypertension, defined as systolic blood pressure (BP) and/or diastolic BP > 95th percentile for age
  • No stroke, myocardial infarction, or unstable angina within the past 6 months
  • No clinically significant peripheral vascular disease
  • No significant traumatic injury within the past 6 weeks
  • No evidence of bleeding diathesis, coagulopathy, or PT INR > 1.5
  • Urine protein/creatinine ratio ≤ 1.0
  • No abdominal fistula or gastrointestinal perforation within the past 6 months
  • No serious nonhealing wound, ulcer, or bone fracture
  • At least 3 weeks since prior myelosuppressive anticancer chemotherapy (6 weeks for nitrosoureas)
  • At least 7 days since prior investigational or biologic agents (3 weeks if patient experienced ≥ grade 2 myelosuppression or if agent has a prolonged half-life)
  • More than 7 days since prior minor surgery
  • More than 12 weeks since prior craniospinal or focal irradiation to primary tumor or other sites
  • At least 4 weeks since prior major surgery and recovered
  • At least 3 months since prior autologous bone marrow or stem cell transplantation
  • At least 2 weeks since prior colony-forming growth factors (i.e., filgrastim [G-CSF], sargramostim [GM-CSF], epoetin alfa)
  • No prior bevacizumab or irinotecan hydrochloride
  • No anticipated surgery during treatment
  • No concurrent prophylactic G-CSF, GM-CSF, or epoetin alfa
  • Concurrent dexamethasone allowed provided the dose is stable or decreasing over the past week
  • No other concurrent anticancer or investigational drugs
  • No concurrent medications that may interfere with study (e.g., immunosuppressive agents other than corticosteroids)
  • No concurrent therapeutic anticoagulation
  • No concurrent nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, clopidogrel bisulfate, dipyridamole, or acetylsalicylic acid (aspirin) > 81 mg/day

Who cannot join

None listed.

Trial locations and contacts

11 sites in 1 country.

11 sites in 1 country

United States11 sites
  • Dana-Farber Cancer Institute

    Boston, Massachusetts, 02115

  • Lurie Children's Hospital-Chicago

    Chicago, Illinois, 60611

  • Duke University Medical Center

    Durham, North Carolina, 27710

  • Texas Children's Hospital

    Houston, Texas, 77030

  • Pediatric Brain Tumor Consortium

    Memphis, Tennessee, 38105

  • St. Jude Children's Research Hospital

    Memphis, Tennessee, 38105

  • Children's Hospital of Philadelphia

    Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 19104

  • Children's Hospital of Pittsburgh of UPMC

    Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, 15224

  • UCSF Medical Center-Mount Zion

    San Francisco, California, 94115

  • Seattle Children's Hospital

    Seattle, Washington, 98105

  • Children's National Medical Center

    Washington D.C., District of Columbia, 20010

Other trials in United States

About this study

Official title: Phase II Study of Bevacizumab Plus Irinotecan (Camptosar™) in Children With Recurrent, Progressive, or Refractory Malignant Gliomas, Diffuse/Intrinsic Brain Stem Gliomas, Medulloblastomas, Ependymomas and Low Grade Gliomas

This phase II trial is studying how well giving bevacizumab together with irinotecan works in treating young patients with recurrent, progressive, or refractory glioma, medulloblastoma, ependymoma, or low grade glioma. Monoclonal antibodies, such as bevacizumab, can block tumor growth in different ways. Some block the ability of tumor cells to grow and spread. Others find tumor cells and help kill them or carry tumor-killing substances to them. Bevacizumab may also stop the growth of glioma by blocking blood flow to the tumor. Drugs used in chemotherapy, such as irinotecan, work in different ways to stop the growth of tumor cells, either by killing the cells or by stopping them from dividing. Giving bevacizumab together with irinotecan may kill more tumor cells.

Read the detailed description

PRIMARY OBJECTIVES:

  1. Estimate the rates of objective response observed prior to disease progression during the first four courses of treatment with bevacizumab and irinotecan hydrochloride in pediatric patients with recurrent, progressive, or refractory malignant glioma (Stratum A [closed to accrual as of 4/21/2009]) or recurrent/progressive/refractory intrinsic brain stem glioma (Stratum B [closed to accrual as of 4/21/2009]).

II. Estimate the rates of objective response observed prior to disease progression during the first four courses of treatment with bevacizumab and irinotecan hydrochloride in patients with recurrent or progressive medulloblastoma (Stratum C [closed to accrual as of 10/27/2009]) or recurrent or progressive ependymoma (Stratum D [closed to accrual as of 7/29/2010]).

III. Estimate the sustained disease stabilization rate associated with bevacizumab and irinotecan in patients with recurrent or progressive low grade glioma (Stratum E [closed to accrual as of 7/29/2010]).

SECONDARY OBJECTIVES:

  1. Estimate the rate of treatment-related toxicity of this regimen in these patients.

II. Estimate the cumulative incidence of sustained objective responses as a function of this regimen in these patients.

III. Estimate the distributions of survival and event-free survival of these patients.

IV. Correlate functional changes in tumor with progression-free survival and response using MR perfusion/diffusion imaging and fludeoxyglucose F 18 positron emission tomography.

OUTLINE: This is a multicenter study. Patients are stratified according to tumor type (high-grade glioma [closed to accrual as of 4/21/2009] vs intrinsic brain stem tumor [closed to accrual as of 4/21/2009] vs medulloblastoma [closed to accrual as of 10/27/2010] vs ependymoma [closed to accrual as of 7/29/2010] vs low grade glioma [closed to accrual as of 7/29/2010]).

Patients receive bevacizumab IV over 30-90 minutes on days 1 and 15 and irinotecan hydrochloride IV over 90 minutes on day 16 or 17 for course 1. Patients receive bevacizumab and irinotecan hydrochloride on days 1 and 15 for all subsequent courses. Treatment repeats every 4 weeks for up to 24 courses in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity.

Patients undergo MRIs of the brain, magnetic resonance perfusion/diffusion, and fludeoxyglucose F 18 positron emission tomography at baseline and periodically during treatment.

After completion of study treatment, patients are followed for 30 days and then every 3 months for up to 2 years.

Being tested
Bevacizumab, Fludeoxyglucose F-18, Irinotecan Hydrochloride
Medical subject headings
Oligodendroglioma, Spinal Cord Neoplasms, Familial ependymoma, Medulloblastoma

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • BevacizumabBiological

    Also called Anti-VEGF, Anti-VEGF Humanized Monoclonal Antibody, Anti-VEGF rhuMAb, Avastin

    Given IV

  • Fludeoxyglucose F-18Radiation

    Also called 18FDG, FDG, fludeoxyglucose F 18, Fludeoxyglucose F18

    Undergo fludeoxyglucose F18 PET

  • Irinotecan HydrochlorideDrug

    Also called Campto, Camptosar, Camptothecin 11, Camptothecin-11

    Given IV

Study groups in NCT00381797
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Arm IExperimentalPatients receive bevacizumab IV over 30-90 minutes on days 1 and 15 and irinotecan hydrochloride IV over 90 minutes on day 16 or 17 for course 1. Patients receive bevacizumab and irinotecan hydrochloride on days 1 and 15 for all subsequent courses. Treatment repeats every 4 weeks for up to 24 courses in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Patients undergo MRIs of the brain, magnetic resonance perfusion/diffusion, and fludeoxyglucose F 18 positron emission tomography at baseline and periodically during treatment.
Receives: Biological: Bevacizumab; Radiation: Fludeoxyglucose F-18; Drug: Irinotecan Hydrochloride

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Objective Response Rate Sustained for ≥ 8 Weeks

    Objective response is either a complete response or a partial response observed during the first four courses of treatment and sustained for 8 weeks. The objective response rate will be reported separately for patients with recurrent/progressive malignant glioma(Stratum A), recurrent/progressive instrinsic brain stem tumors(Stratum B), recurrent/progressive medulloblastoma(Stratum C), and recurrent/progressive ependymoma(Stratum D). CR is complete disappearance of all enhancing tumor. PR is >= 50% reduction in tumor size. This outcome measures is not defined for the Stratum E in the protocol.

    Measured: From day 1 of treatment up to 24 weeks

  2. Sustained Disease Stabilization Rate Associated With Bevacizumab and Irinotecan in Patients With Recurrent or Progressive Low-grade Glioma (Stratum E)

    Disease stabilization is defined as a complete response(CR) or partial response(PR) observed during the first four courses and sustained for 8 weeks; or stable disease (SD) sustained for 6 courses characterized by SD at the end of course 2, at the end of course 4 and at the end of course 6. CR is complete disappearance of all enhancing tumor. PR is >= 50% reduction in tumor size. SD is at least stable and maintenance corticosteroid dose not increased in neurologic examination.

    Measured: From day 1 of treatment up to 24 weeks

Secondary outcomes (25)
  1. Number of Study Participants With Grade 3 or 4 Treatment-related Toxicity

    Adverse events are monitored and graded according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events. The grade 1 = mild, grade 2=moderate, grade 3 =severe, grade 4=life threatening/disabling, grade 5=death.

    Measured: From day 1 of treatment until off study

  2. Cumulative Incidence of Sustained Objective Responses

    Cumulative incidence of sustained objective response provides a percentage of participants experiencing the event of interest at a given follow-up time point (for example, 6-months, 1-year, etc.) in the presence of competing events such as progressive disease or death, and it is estimated using the event data for both the event of interest and the competing events experienced by the study participants. In this sense, it is different than the incidence rates estimated in epidemiological studies in terms of 'incidences per 1000 person years. 6-month Cumulative incidence of sustained objective responses will be reported separately for each stratum.

    Measured: From the first imaging after treatment up to 2 years

  3. Progression-free Survival

    Progression-Free survival is the interval of time between of protocol treatment and minimum date of documentation of progressive Disease,second malignancy,death due to any cause, or date of last follow-up. Progressive neurologic abnormalities or worsening neurologic status not explained by causes unrelated to tumor progression,OR the appearance of new tumor OR a > 25% increase in the sum of the products of two longest perpendicular diameters of all measurable tumors. K-M method was used to estimate progression-free survival.

    Measured: From start of treatment up to 2 years

  4. Change in Perfusion Ratio Between the Baseline and Day 15 Brain Imaging

    Perfusion ratio obtained from magnetic resonance(MR) diffusion imaging may explain changes in the tumor after therapy. Changes in the perfusion ratio will be reported for those strata that have a sufficient number of participants with MR diffusion imaging. The change was calculated from perfusion ratio at Baseline to perfusion ratio at Day 15(values of perfusion ratio at Day 15 - values of perfusion ratio at baseline). The higher of perfusion ratio is worse.

    MR perfusion ratio is perfusion solid part of tumor from CBV divided by perfusion frontal while matter. There is no a unit available.

    Measured: Baseline and day 15

  5. Change in Diffusion Ratio Between the Baseline and Day 15 Brain Image

    Diffusion ratio obtained from magnetic resonance (MR) diffusion imaging may explain changes in the tumor after therapy. Changes in the diffusion ratio will be reported for those strata that have a sufficient number of participants with MR diffusion imaging. The change was calculated from diffusion ratio at Baseline to diffusion ratio at Day 15 (values of diffusion ratio at Day 15 -values of diffusion ration at baseline). The higher of diffusion ratio is better. MR diffusion ratio is the diffusion solid part of tumor divided by the diffusion frontal white matter. There is no a unit available.

    Measured: Baseline and day 15

  6. Association of Log-transformed Tumor Volume Based on FLAIR With Progression-free Survival (PFS) Using Hazard Ratio Estimates

    Using Cox proportional hazards models, the association of tumor volume based on FLAIR images with PFS will be investigated for those strata that have a sufficient number of participants with volume FLAIR measurements. Volumetric magnetic resonance imaging is performed to investigate surrogate markers of tumor growth. Volume FLAIR measurements were longitudinal. As we are not comparing the strata, analyses will be done in each stratum separately, and thus we cannot report the Cox model results in the Statistical Analysis section. We consider these estimates 'descriptive' within each stratum. In this analysis, the hazard ratio is a relative measure of likelihood that a study participant experiences the event of interest compared to another participant who has a one-unit lower Log-transformed tumor volume based on FLAIR. The Cox survival model provides the mean hazard ratio along with its 95% confidence interval, which we report below.

    Measured: From start of treatment until the earliest of progressive disease, death, second malignancy or off study OR up to 2 years

  7. Association of Log-transformed Tumor Enhancing Volume With Progression-free Survival (PFS) Using Hazard Ratio Estimates

    Using Cox Proportional hazards Models, the association of Log-transformed tumor enhancing volume with progression-free survival will be investigated. Volumetric magnetic resonance (MR) imaging is performed to investigate surrogate markers of tumor growth. Tumor enhancing volumes were longitudinal. As we are not comparing the strata or study arms, analyses will be done in each stratum separately, and thus we cannot report the Cox model results in the Statistical Analysis section and we consider these estimates 'descriptive' within each stratum. In this analysis, the hazard ratio is a relative measure of likelihood that a study participant experiences the event of interest compared to another participant who has a one-unit lower Log-transformed tumor enhancing volume. The Cox survival model provides the mean hazard ratio along with its 95% confidence interval, which we report below.

    Measured: From start of treatment until the earliest of progressive disease, death, second malignancy or off study, OR up to 2 years

  8. Association of Log-transformed Volume of Cystic Necrosis With Progression-free Survival (PFS) Using Hazard Ratio Estimates

    Using Cox Proportional Hazards Models, the association of cystic necrosis with progression-free survival will be investigated. Volumetric magnetic resonance (MR) imaging is performed to investigate surrogate markers of tumor growth. Volumes of cystic necrosis were longitudinal. As we are not comparing the strata or study arms, analyses will be done in each stratum separately, and thus we cannot report the Cox model results in the Statistical Analysis section and we consider these estimates 'descriptive' within each stratum. In this analysis, the hazard ratio is a relative measure of likelihood that a study participant experiences the event of interest compared to another participant who has a one-unit lower Log-transformed tumor volume based on cystic necrosis. The Cox survival model provides the mean hazard ratio along with its 95% confidence interval, which we report below.

    Measured: From start of treatment until the earliest of progressive disease, death, second malignancy or off study, OR up to 2 years

  9. Association of Log-transformed Tumor Diffusion Ratio With Progression-free Survival (PFS) Using Hazard Ratio Estimates

    Using Cox Proportional Hazards Models, the association of tumor diffusion ratios with progression-free survival will be investigated. Magnetic resonance (MR) diffusion imaging is performed to investigate surrogate markers of tumor growth. Tumor diffusion ratios were longitudinal. As we are not comparing the strata or study arms, analyses will be done in each stratum separately, and thus we cannot report the Cox model results in the Statistical Analysis section. And we consider these estimates 'descriptive' within each stratum. In this analysis, the hazard ratio is a relative measure of likelihood that a study participant experiences the event of interest compared to another participant who has a one-unit lower Log-transformed tumor diffusion ratio. The Cox survival model provides the mean hazard ratio along with its 95% confidence interval, which we report below.

    Measured: From start of treatment until the earliest of progressive disease, death, second malignancy or off study

  10. Association of Log-transformed Tumor Perfusion Ratio With Progression-free Survival (PFS) Using Hazard Ratio Estimates

    Using Cox Proportional Hazards Models, the association of tumor perfusion ratio with progression-free survival will be investigated. Magnetic resonance (MR) perfusion imaging is performed to investigate surrogate markers of tumor growth. Tumor perfusion ratios were longitudinal. As we are not comparing the strata or study arms, analyses will be done in each stratum separately, and thus we cannot report the Cox model results in the Statistical Analysis section. We consider these estimates 'descriptive' within each stratum. In this analysis, the hazard ratio is a relative measure of likelihood that a study participant experiences the event of interest compared to another participant who has a one-unit lower Log-transformed tumor volume perfusion ratio. The Cox survival model provides the mean hazard ratio along with its 95% confidence interval, which we report below.

    Measured: From start of treatment until the earliest of progressive disease, death, second malignancy or off study, OR up to 2 years

  11. Volume of Distribution

    Blood specimens were collected on the days listed for pharmacokinetic studies for Bevacizumab. These specimens were analyzed to produce steady-state plasma Bevacizumab concentration-time data in study participants. The concentration-time data were analyzed to provide an estimate of the volume of distribution. The data were collected but the analyses of the PK data were conducted by Genentech using a broader cohort of pediatric patients from multiple trials in the paper "Bevacizumab dosing strategy in paediatric cancer patients based on population pharmacokinetic analysis with external validation" published by British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology ,2016 volume 81(1):148-160. The estimates of the volume of distribution were calculated by the model described in the paper.

    Measured: Baseline, Course 1 Day 1, Course 1 Day 15, Course 2 Day 1, Course 3 Day 1, Course 4 Day 1, and Course 5 Day 1

  12. Systemic Clearance

    Blood specimens were collected on the days listed for pharmacokinetic studies for Bevacizumab. These specimens were analyzed to produce steady-state plasma Bevacizumab concentration-time data in study participants. The concentration-time data were analyzed to provide an estimate of the systemic clearance. The data were collected but the analyses of the PK data were conducted by Genentech using a broader cohort of pediatric patients from multiple trials in the paper "Bevacizumab dosing strategy in paediatric cancer patients based on population pharmacokinetic analysis with external validation" published by British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology, 2016 volume 81(1):148-160. The estimates of the systemic clearance were calculated by the model described in the paper.

    Measured: Baseline, Course 1 Day 1, Course 1 Day 15, Course 2 Day 1, Course 3 Day 1, Course 4 Day 1, and Course 5 Day 1

  13. Terminal Half-life

    Blood specimens were collected on the days listed for pharmacokinetic studies for Bevacizumab. These specimens were analyzed to produce steady-state plasma Bevacizumab concentration-time data in study participants. The concentration-time data were analyzed to provide an estimate of the PK parameters. The data were collected but the analyses of the PK data were conducted by Genentech using a broader cohort of pediatric patients from multiple trials in the paper "Bevacizumab dosing strategy in paediatric cancer patients based on population pharmacokinetic analysis with external validation" published by British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology,2016 volume 81(1):148-160. The estimates of the terminal half-life were calculated by the method described in the paper.

    Measured: Baseline, Course 1 Day 1, Course 1 Day 15, Course 2 Day 1, Course 3 Day 1, Course 4 Day 1, and Course 5 Day 1

  14. Change in Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Receptor-2 (VEGF-R2) Expression in Peripheral Blood Mononuclear Cells (PBMC) From Baseline to Day-15

    The change in VEGF-R2 was calculated from baseline to the time of the 2nd dose (values of 24-48 hours after the 2nd dose at Day 15 - values of pre-dose 1 Day1, i.e., baseline). VEGF-R2 is measured in the relative phosphorylation score which is generated as a ratio of normalized phosphorylated VEGF-R2 versus normalized total VEGF-R2 protein.

    Measured: Baseline and 24-48 hours after the 2nd dose of Bevacizumab in course 1

  15. Descriptive Statistics for the Changes in Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Receptor-2 (VEGF-R2) Expression in Peripheral Blood Mononuclear Cells (PBMC) Concurrently Measured With the Changes in Perfusion From Magnetic Resonance Imaging

    The changes in VEGF-R2 are calculated by values at Day 15 minus values at baseline for the patients who had the changes in perfusion from magnetic resonance perfusion imaging. The purpose of reporting descriptive statistics of changes of VEGF-R2 is to provide the information for the correlation coefficients in Section 19.

    Measured: Baseline and Day 15 (after 2 doses of Bevacizumab) of course 1

  16. Descriptive Statistics for the Change of Perfusion in Magnetic Resonance Imaging Concurrently Measured With the Change in Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Receptor-2 (VEGF-R2) Expression in Peripheral Blood Mononuclear Cells (PBMC)

    The change of perfusion in magnetic resonance imaging is calculated by taking the difference between the Day-15 measurements and the Baseline measurements for patients who had the changes of VEGF-R2. The purpose of reporting the descriptive statistics is to provide the information for the correlation coefficients reported in the next section, Section 19. MR perfusion ratio is the ratio of the perfusion measurements in the tumor and the perfusion measurerement in comparative frontal while matter, which is the comparative healthy part of the brain.

    Measured: Baseline and Day 15 (after 2 doses of Bevacizumab) of course 1

  17. Correlation of the Change in Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Receptor-2 (VEGF-R2) Expression in Peripheral Blood Mononuclear Cells (PBMC) From Baseline With the Change in Perfusion From Magnetic Resonance Imaging

    Spearman correlation coefficient is used to measure the correlation of the changes in VEGF-R2 with the changes in perfusion ratios. The changes are calculated by values at Day 15 minus values at baseline for VEGF-2 in Section 17 above and perfusion in Section 18 above, respectively. The correlation coefficients are reported in each stratum separately.

    Measured: Baseline and Day 15 (after 2 doses of Bevacizumab) of course 1

  18. Number of Patients With High Hypoxia Inducible Factor-2alpha Expression at Baseline

    The expression of Hypoxia inducible factor-2α, carbonic anhydrase IX (CA9), VEGF-A, and VEGF-R2 will be estimated by immunohistochemistry of paraffin sections in the medulloblastoma,ependymoma and low grade glioma strata. Reported separately for each stratum.

    Measured: Baseline

  19. Number of Patients With High Carbonic Anhydrase 9 Expression at Baseline

    The expression of Hypoxia inducible factor-2α, carbonic anhydrase IX (CA9), VEGF-A, and VEGF-R2 will be estimated by immunohistochemistry of paraffin sections in the medulloblastoma,ependymoma and low grade glioma strata. Reported separately for each stratum.

    Measured: Baseline

  20. Number of Patients With High VEGF-A Expression at Baseline

    The expression of Hypoxia inducible factor-2α, carbonic anhydrase IX (CA9), VEGF-A, and VEGF-R2 will be estimated by immunohistochemistry of paraffin sections in the medulloblastoma,ependymoma and low grade glioma strata. Reported separately for each stratum.

    Measured: Baseline

  21. Number of Patients With High VEGF-R2 Expression at Baseline

    The expression of Hypoxia inducible factor-2α, carbonic anhydrase IX (CA9), VEGF-A, and VEGF-R2 will be estimated by immunohistochemistry of paraffin sections in the medulloblastoma,ependymoma and low grade glioma strata. Reported separately for each stratum.

    Measured: Baseline

  22. Progression-free Survival Hazard Ratio by Hypoxia Inducible Factor-2alpha Expression

    The association of hypoxia inducible factor-2alpha expression with progression-free survival will be investigated for those strata that have a sufficient number of participants with hypoxia inducible factor-2alpha measurements. The hazard ratio was reported for patients who had hypoxia inducible factor-2alpha expression.

    Measured: From start of treatment until the earliest of progressive disease, death, second malignancy or off study

  23. Progression-free Survival Hazard Ratio by Carbonic Anhydrase 9 (CA9) Expression

    The association of CA9 expression with progression-free survival will be investigated for those strata that have a sufficient number of participants with CA9 measurements.

    Measured: From start of treatment until the earliest of progressive disease, death, second malignancy or off study

  24. Progression-free Survival Hazard Ratio by VEGF-A Expression

    The association of VEGF-A expression with progression-free survival will be investigated for those strata that have a sufficient number of participants with VEGF-A measurements.

    Measured: From start of treatment until the earliest of progressive disease, death, second malignancy or off study

  25. Progression-free Survival Hazard Ratio by VEGF-R2 Expression

    The association of VEGF-R2 expression with progression-free survival will be investigated for those strata that have a sufficient number of participants with VEGF-R2 measurements.

    Measured: From start of treatment until the earliest of progressive disease, death, second malignancy or off study

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted28 Sep 2006 (estimated)
  2. Study startAug 2006
  3. Primary completionOct 2015
  4. Study completionOct 2015

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 2
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
97 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT00381797
Sponsor's protocol ID
NCI-2009-01090
Other IDs
NCI-2009-01090, PBTC-022, CDR0000499832, PBTC-022, PBTC-022, U01CA081457
Status last verified
Oct 2017
First submitted
26 Sep 2006
Last updated
28 Nov 2017
Data monitoring committee
Yes

Publications

  • Han K, Peyret T, Quartino A, Gosselin NH, Gururangan S, Casanova M, Merks JH, Massimino M, Grill J, Daw NC, Navid F, Jin J, Allison DE. Bevacizumab dosing strategy in paediatric cancer patients based on population pharmacokinetic analysis with external validation. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2016 Jan;81(1):148-60. doi: 10.1111/bcp.12778. Epub 2015 Dec 10.

    PubMed 26345283

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 2 study testing Bevacizumab, Fludeoxyglucose F-18 and Irinotecan Hydrochloride in people with Childhood Cerebral Anaplastic Astrocytoma and Childhood Oligodendroglioma, run by National Cancer Institute (NCI) at 11 sites in United States.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 61 inclusion and 0 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 28 Nov 2017. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 11 sites in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this phase mean?

Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 15 Jan 2013). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Objective Response Rate Sustained for ≥ 8 Weeks (time frame: From day 1 of treatment up to 24 weeks). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT00381797, which also lists 1 linked publication.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 28 Nov 2017; AzTrials last refreshed its copy on 26 Oct 2026.

Free account

Keep searching with a free account

You’ve used your 3 free searches for this session. Log in or create a free AzTrials account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in