B-cell Childhood Acute Lymphoblastic LeukemiaPhase 3NCT00382109
Tacrolimus and Methotrexate With or Without Sirolimus in Preventing Graft-Versus-Host Disease in Young Patients Undergoing Donor Stem Cell Transplant for Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia in Complete Remission
A Phase 3 study testing thiotepa, cyclophosphamide and tacrolimus in people with B-cell Childhood Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia and Childhood Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia in Remission, run by Children's Oncology Group at 50 sites in 3 countries.
Trial summary
This randomized phase III trial is studying tacrolimus, methotrexate, and sirolimus to see how well they work compared to tacrolimus and methotrexate in preventing graft-versus-host disease in young patients who are undergoing donor stem cell transplant for intermediate-risk or high-risk acute lymphoblastic leukemia… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 1 year to 21 years
- Conditions the study is for
- B-cell Childhood Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia, Childhood Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia in Remission, Graft Versus Host Disease
- What is being tested?
- thiotepa, cyclophosphamide and tacrolimus
- Type of treatment
- Pill or oral medicine, Injection or infusion, Surgery or procedure
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 146 participants
- Where
- 50 sitesin 3 countries
- Study dates
- Mar 2007to 30 Jun 2017
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 1 year to 21 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Child, Adult
Who may be able to join
- Histologically or cytologically confirmed acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) in second complete remission (CR2) (M1 bone marrow, < 5% blasts by morphology) meeting the following criteria:
- Intermediate risk relapsed ALL in CR2 (may receive matched sibling transplantation only) meeting 1 of the following criteria:
- B-lineage ALL in CR2 after a late first bone marrow (BM) relapse (≥ 36 months after the initiation of primary chemotherapy) with or without associated extramedullary disease
- B-lineage ALL in CR2 after a very early isolated extramedullary relapse (<18 months from the initiation of primary chemotherapy)
- High risk relapsed ALL in CR2 (may receive other related donor, unrelated donor, or matched sibling transplantation) meeting 1 of the following criteria:
- In CR2 after an early first BM relapse (< 36 months from initiation of primary chemotherapy)
Show all 39Show fewer
- T-lineage ALL in CR2 after a first BM relapse occurring at any time after initiation of primary chemotherapy
- Philadelphia chromosome-positive ALL in CR2 after a first BM relapse occurring at any time after the initiation of primary chemotherapy
- T-lineage ALL in CR2 after a very early isolated extramedullary relapse (<18 months from the initiation of primary chemotherapy)
- High risk de novo ALL in CR1 (may receive matched sibling, other related/unrelated BM/PBSC or unrelated CB transplantation) meeting 1 of the following criteria:
- Patients with the presence of t(9;22) translocation (Ph+) detected by cytogenetic or PCR analysis at initial diagnosis. For patients on AALL0622, the criteria for transplant are 1) any patient with Ph+ ALL with an available matched sibling donor or 2) any patient with Ph+ ALL that is defined as high risk (MRD > 1% Day 29 or MRD > 0.01% end-Consolidation Block 2) with any available donor, related or unrelated. Patients enrolled on AALL0622 are only eligible if they follow this algorithm.
- Patients with the presence of extreme hypodiploidy (< 44 chromosomes or DNA index of < 0.81) detected by cytogenetic/ploidy analysis at initial diagnosis.
- Patients with the presence of 11q23 (MLL) rearrangements detected by cytogenetic or PCR analysis at initial diagnosis who are slow early responders (M2/M3 at Day 14 or MRD > 0.1% at Day 29).
- Enrolled on an appropriate COG relapsed ALL clinical trial after completing the required study therapy (i.e., minimum 1 re-induction course (4-6 weeks) and 1 round of intensive consolidation chemotherapy (3-6 weeks). Patients with high risk ALL in CR1 are eligible as soon as they have achieved a CR.
- Patients not on a COG relapsed ALL clinical trial are eligible provided they have received ≥ 1 round of re-induction lasting 4-6 weeks and 1 round of intensive consolidation chemotherapy lasting 3-6 weeks
- No B-cell ALL L3 morphology with evidence of myc translocation by molecular or cytogenetic technique
- No Down syndrome
- No evidence of active CNS or other extramedullary disease (i.e., no CNS2)
- Karnofsky performance status (PS) 60-100% (for patients > 16 years of age) OR Lansky PS 60-100% (for patients ≤ 16 years of age)
- Shortening fraction ≥ 27% by echocardiogram OR ejection fraction ≥ 50% by radionuclide angiogram
- ALT or AST < 5 times upper limit of normal
- Bilirubin < 2.5 mg/dL (unless an increase is attributable to Gilbert's syndrome)
- Creatinine clearance OR radioisotope glomerular filtration rate ≥ 70 mL/min
- FEV_1 ≥ 60% by pulmonary function tests (PFTs)
- FVC ≥ 60% by PFTs
- DLCO ≥ 60% by PFTs
- For children who are unable to cooperate for PFTs all of the following criteria must be met:
- No evidence of dyspnea at rest
- No exercise intolerance
- No requirement for supplemental oxygen therapy
- Not pregnant or nursing
- Negative pregnancy test
- Fertile patients must use effective contraception
- No HIV or uncontrolled fungal, bacterial, or viral infection
- Fungal infection acquired during induction therapy allowed provided there is a significant response to antifungal therapy with minimal or no evidence of disease by CT scan
- Other concurrent immunosuppressants allowed
- No prior allogeneic or autologous stem cell transplantation
- No prior or concurrent voriconazole unless prior voriconazole therapy is completed or a different agent is substituted for voriconazole prior to study entry
- No concurrent grapefruit juice during sirolimus administration
Who cannot join
None listed.
Trial locations and contacts
50 sites in 3 countries.
50 sites in 3 countries
United States44 sites
C S Mott Children's Hospital
Ann Arbor, Michigan, 48109
Children's Healthcare of Atlanta - Egleston
Atlanta, Georgia, 30322
Children's Hospital Colorado
Aurora, Colorado, 80045
Johns Hopkins University
Baltimore, Maryland, 21287-8936
Roswell Park Cancer Institute
Buffalo, New York, 14263
University of North Carolina
Chapel Hill, North Carolina, 27599
Medical University of South Carolina
Charleston, South Carolina, 29425
Childrens Memorial Hospital
Chicago, Illinois, 60614
Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center
Cincinnati, Ohio, 45229
Rainbow Babies and Childrens Hospital
Cleveland, Ohio, 44106
Cleveland Clinic Foundation
Cleveland, Ohio, 44195
Nationwide Children's Hospital
Columbus, Ohio, 43205
University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center
Dallas, Texas, 75390
Wayne State University
Detroit, Michigan, 48202
City of Hope Medical Center
Duarte, California, 91010
Cook Children's Medical Center
Fort Worth, Texas, 76104
Hackensack University Medical Center
Hackensack, New Jersey, 07601
Penn State Hershey Children's Hospital
Hershey, Pennsylvania, 17033
Indiana University Medical Center
Indianapolis, Indiana, 46202
University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics
Iowa City, Iowa, 52242
The Childrens Mercy Hospital
Kansas City, Missouri, 64108
Kosair Children's Hospital
Louisville, Kentucky, 40202
University of Wisconsin Hospital and Clinics
Madison, Wisconsin, 53792
Midwest Children's Cancer Center
Milwaukee, Wisconsin, 53226
Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center
Nashville, Tennessee, 37232
Children's Hospital-Main Campus
New Orleans, Louisiana, 70118
Columbia University Medical Center
New York, New York, 10032
Children's Hospital and Research Center at Oakland
Oakland, California, 94609-1809
Childrens Hospital of Orange County
Orange, California, 92868-3874
Children's Hospital of Philadelphia
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 19104
Phoenix Childrens Hospital
Phoenix, Arizona, 85016
Children's Hospital of Pittsburgh of UPMC
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, 15224
Oregon Health and Science University
Portland, Oregon, 97239
Virginia Commonwealth University
Richmond, Virginia, 23298
University of Rochester
Rochester, New York, 14642
Primary Children's Medical Center
Salt Lake City, Utah, 84113
Methodist Children's Hospital of South Texas
San Antonio, Texas, 78229
Rady Children's Hospital - San Diego
San Diego, California, 92123
University of California San Francisco Medical Center-Parnassus
San Francisco, California, 94143
Seattle Children's Hospital
Seattle, Washington, 98105
Washington University School of Medicine
St Louis, Missouri, 63110
All Children's Hospital
St. Petersburg, Florida, 33701
New York Medical College
Valhalla, New York, 10595
Children's National Medical Center
Washington D.C., District of Columbia, 20010
Canada4 sites
The Montreal Children's Hospital of the MUHC
Montreal, Quebec, H3H 1P3
Hospital for Sick Children
Toronto, Ontario, M5G 1X8
British Columbia Children's Hospital
Vancouver, British Columbia, V6H 3V4
CancerCare Manitoba
Winnipeg, Manitoba, R3E 0V9
Australia2 sites
Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital
Herston, Queensland, 4029
Princess Margaret Hospital for Children
Perth, Western Australia, 6008
About this study
Official title: A Randomized Trial of Sirolimus-Based Graft Versus Host Disease Prophylaxis After Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation in Relapsed Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia
This randomized phase III trial is studying tacrolimus, methotrexate, and sirolimus to see how well they work compared to tacrolimus and methotrexate in preventing graft-versus-host disease in young patients who are undergoing donor stem cell transplant for intermediate-risk or high-risk acute lymphoblastic leukemia in second complete remission and high risk acute lymphoblastic leukemia in first remission. Giving chemotherapy, such as thiotepa and cyclophosphamide, and total-body irradiation before a donor stem cell transplant helps stop the growth of cancer cells. It also helps stop the patient's immune system from rejecting the donor's stem cells. The donated stem cells may replace the patient's immune cells and help destroy any remaining cancer cells (graft-versus-tumor effect). Sometimes the transplanted cells from a donor can also make an immune response against the body's normal cells. Giving tacrolimus, methotrexate, and sirolimus after the transplant may stop this from happening. It is not yet known whether tacrolimus and methotrexate are more effective with or without sirolimus in preventing graft-versus-host disease.
Read the detailed description
PRIMARY OBJECTIVES:
- Compare the post-transplant 2-year event-free survival of pediatric patients with intermediate-risk or high-risk acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) in second complete remission or high risk ALL in first remission undergoing allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation treated with graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) prophylaxis comprising tacrolimus and methotrexate with or without sirolimus.
SECONDARY OBJECTIVES:
- Compare rates of relapses, transplant-related mortality, and acute and chronic GVHD in these patients.
II. Evaluate the relative contribution of resistance by ALL blasts to cytolytic therapy (e.g., chemotherapy/irradiation) as a cause of relapse post-transplantation by correlating ALL in vivo blast resistance with in vivo sirolimus, inhibition levels of the mTOR pathway in patients treated with sirolimus, and altered resistance pathways in ALL blasts measured by microarray analysis.
III. Evaluate the relative contribution of resistance by ALL blasts to the donor immune response as a cause of relapse post-transplantation by correlating the development of donor anti-ALL T-cell response, the development of acute and/or chronic GVHD, and the detection of altered ALL blast immunogenicity after transplant with increased minimal residual disease, persistent recipient chimerism, and relapse.
OUTLINE: This is a randomized, open-label, multicenter study. Patients are stratified according to specific combinations of risk (intermediate CR2 vs high CR2 vs high CR1), donor type (matched sibling vs unrelated or other related), and stem cell source (filgrastim [G-CSF]-primed bone marrow vs unprimed bone marrow vs bone marrow vs peripheral blood vs umbilical cord blood).
PREPARATIVE REGIMEN: Patients undergo total-body irradiation twice daily on days -8 to -6 and receive thiotepa IV on days -5 and -4 and cyclophosphamide IV on days -3 and -2.
ALLOGENEIC HEMATOPOIETIC STEM CELL TRANSPLANTATION: Patients undergo allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation on day 0.
GRAFT-VERSUS-HOST DISEASE (GVHD) PROPHYLAXIS: Patients are randomized to 1 of 2 treatment arms.
ARM I: (experimental) Patients receive tacrolimus IV continuously or orally (when able) daily beginning on day -2 followed by a taper beginning on day 42 and continuing until day 98 (for patients undergoing matched sibling donor transplantation) OR tacrolimus IV continuously or orally daily beginning on day -2 followed by a taper beginning on day 100 and continuing until day 180 (for patients undergoing related, unrelated, or cord blood donor transplantation) in the absence of GVHD. Patients also receive methotrexate IV on days 1, 3, and 6 (for patients with matched sibling and umbilical cord blood donors) OR days 1, 3, 6, and 11 (for patients with unrelated bone marrow and peripheral blood stem cell donors) and oral sirolimus daily beginning on day 0 followed by a taper beginning on day 180 and continuing until day 207.
ARM II: (control) Patients receive tacrolimus and methotrexate as in arm I.
After completion of study treatment, patients are followed periodically for approximately 5 years.
- Conditions
- B-cell Childhood Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia, Childhood Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia in Remission, Graft Versus Host Disease, L1 Childhood Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia, L2 Childhood Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia, T-cell Childhood Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia
- Being tested
- thiotepa, cyclophosphamide, tacrolimus, methotrexate, sirolimus
- Medical subject headings
- Graft vs Host Disease, Precursor Cell Lymphoblastic Leukemia-Lymphoma
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
thiotepaDrug
Also called Oncotiotepa, STEPA, TESPA, Tespamin
Given IV
cyclophosphamideDrug
Also called CPM, CTX, Cytoxan, Endoxan
Given IV
tacrolimusDrug
Also called FK 506, Prograf
Given IV or orally
methotrexateDrug
Also called amethopterin, Folex, methylaminopterin, Mexate
Given IV
sirolimusDrug
Also called AY 22989, Rapamune, rapamycin, SLM
Given orally
total body irradiationRadiation
Also called TBI
Part of the transplant preparatory regimen
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Tacro-MTX/Sirolimus GVHD Prophylaxis Regimen | Experimental | Preparative regimen of total body irradiation (TBI) 200 cGy BID days -8,-7, \& -6, Thiotepa IV (dose 5 mg/kg/day on days -5 \& -4) \& cyclophosphamide IV (dose 60 mg/kg/day on days -3 \& -2). Tacrolimus IV (dose 0.02 mg/kg/day) continuously or orally daily on day -2 with a taper starting on day 42 - day 98 (patients undergoing matched sibling donor transplantation) OR tacrolimus IV (dose 0.02 mg/kg/day) continuously or orally daily beginning on day -2 followed by a taper on day 100 through day 180 (patients undergoing other related, unrelated, or cord blood donor transplantation) in the absence of GVHD. Patients also receive methotrexate IV (5 mg/m2/dose) on days 1,3, \& 6 (patients with matched sibling and umbilical cord blood donors) OR days 1,3 6, \& 11 (patients with other related/unrelated bone marrow and peripheral blood stem cell donors) and oral sirolimus (dose 2.5mg/m2/day - 4 mg max starting dose) daily starting on day 0 followed by a taper starting on day 180 through day 207. Receives: Drug: thiotepa; Drug: cyclophosphamide; Drug: tacrolimus; Drug: methotrexate; Drug: sirolimus; Radiation: total body irradiation |
| Tacro-MTX GVHD Prophylaxis | Active comparator | Preparative regimen of total body irradiation (TBI) 200 cGy BID days -8,-7, \& -6, Thiotepa IV (dose 5 mg/kg/day on days -5 \& -4) \& cyclophosphamide IV (dose 60 mg/kg/day on days -3 \& -2). Tacrolimus IV (dose 0.02 mg/kg/day) continuously or orally (when able) daily on day -2 with a taper starting on day 42 - day 98 (patients undergoing matched sibling donor transplantation) OR tacrolimus IV (dose 0.02 mg/kg/day) continuously or orally daily beginning on day -2 followed by a taper on day 100 through day 180 (patients undergoing other related, unrelated, or cord blood donor transplantation) in the absence of GVHD. Patients also receive methotrexate IV (5 mg/m2/dose) on days 1,3, \& 6 (patients with matched sibling and umbilical cord blood donors) OR days 1,3 6, \& 11 (patients with other related/unrelated bone marrow and peripheral blood stem cell donors). Receives: Drug: thiotepa; Drug: cyclophosphamide; Drug: tacrolimus; Drug: methotrexate; Radiation: total body irradiation |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Estimated Percentage of Participants With Event Free Survival
An event is defined as relapse or transplant-related mortality. Relapse is defined in section 3.3 study protocol.
Measured: at 2 years
Secondary outcomes (8)
Rate of Relapses
An event is defined as relapse.
Measured: At 2 years
Estimated Transplant Related Mortality Percentage
Death in a patient who had not relapsed after transplant is defined as transplant-related mortality event.
Measured: 100 days
Estimated Rate of Acute Graft VS Host Disease (GVHD)
Any grade acute graft vs host disease (defined in APPENDIX II study protocol).
Measured: At 200 days
Estimated Rate of Overall Chronic Graft VS Host Disease
Chronic graft vs host disease is defined in APPENDIX III of study protocol.
Measured: At 2 years
Relative Contribution of Resistance by Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia (ALL) Blasts to Cytolytic Therapy (e.g., Chemotherapy/Irradiation) as a Cause of Relapse Post-transplantation
An event is defined as relapse or transplant-related mortality.
Measured: Up to 1 year
Relative Contribution of ALL Blasts to the Donor Immune Response as a Cause of Relapse Post Transplantation (Correlating Development of aGVHD With Relapse)
An event is defined as relapse; estimated probability of relapse.
Measured: At 1 year
Relative Contribution of ALL Blasts to the Donor Immune Response as a Cause of Relapse Pre-Transplantation (MRD)
An event is defined as relapse; relapse risk is reported. Not able to be performed given the low numbers of blast samples available.
Measured: At 2 months
Chimerism
Evaluate the relative contribution of resistance by ALL blasts to the donor immune response as a cause of relapse post transplantation.
Measured: Up to 12 months
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted28 Sep 2006 (estimated)
- Study startMar 2007
- Primary completionMay 2011
- Study completion30 Jun 2017
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Publications (2)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for B-cell Childhood Acute Lymphoblastic LeukemiaStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Children's Oncology GroupThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 146 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Children's Oncology Group
- Sponsor type
- Research network
- Collaborators
- National Cancer Institute (NCI)
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Michael Pulsipher, MD, Principal investigator, Children's Oncology Group
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00382109
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- ASCT0431
- Other IDs
- NCI-2009-01068, CDR0000500131, COG-PBMTC-ONCO51, COG-ASCT0431, U10CA098543
- Status last verified
- Jun 2019
- First submitted
- 26 Sep 2006
- Last updated
- 7 Aug 2019
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
Publications
Pulsipher MA, Carlson C, Langholz B, Wall DA, Schultz KR, Bunin N, Kirsch I, Gastier-Foster JM, Borowitz M, Desmarais C, Williamson D, Kalos M, Grupp SA. IgH-V(D)J NGS-MRD measurement pre- and early post-allotransplant defines very low- and very high-risk ALL patients. Blood. 2015 May 28;125(22):3501-8. doi: 10.1182/blood-2014-12-615757. Epub 2015 Apr 10.
PubMed 25862561Pulsipher MA, Langholz B, Wall DA, Schultz KR, Bunin N, Carroll WL, Raetz E, Gardner S, Gastier-Foster JM, Howrie D, Goyal RK, Douglas JG, Borowitz M, Barnes Y, Teachey DT, Taylor C, Grupp SA. The addition of sirolimus to tacrolimus/methotrexate GVHD prophylaxis in children with ALL: a phase 3 Children's Oncology Group/Pediatric Blood and Marrow Transplant Consortium trial. Blood. 2014 Mar 27;123(13):2017-25. doi: 10.1182/blood-2013-10-534297. Epub 2014 Feb 4.
PubMed 24497539
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 7 Aug 2019. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- A Randomized Trial of Sirolimus-Based Graft Versus Host Disease Prophylaxis After Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation in Relapsed Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00382109
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- ASCT0431
- Conditions
- B-cell Childhood Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia, Childhood Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia in Remission, Graft Versus Host Disease, L1 Childhood Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia, L2 Childhood Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia, T-cell Childhood Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 146 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Children's Oncology GroupResearch network
- Collaborators
- National Cancer Institute (NCI)
- Study start
- Mar 2007
- Primary completion
- May 2011 (actual)
- Study completion
- 30 Jun 2017 (actual)
- First posted
- 28 Sep 2006 (estimated)
- Results
- Posted 9 Feb 2017
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
This randomized phase III trial is studying tacrolimus, methotrexate, and sirolimus to see how well they work compared to tacrolimus and methotrexate in preventing graft-versus-host disease in young patients who are undergoing donor stem cell transplant for intermediate-risk or high-risk acute lymphoblastic leukemia in second complete remission and high risk acute lymphoblastic leukemia in first remission. Giving chemotherapy, such as thiotepa and cyclophosphamide, and total-body irradiation before a donor stem cell transplant helps stop the growth of cancer cells. It also helps stop the patient's immune system from rejecting the donor's stem cells. The donated stem cells may replace the patient's immune cells and help destroy any remaining cancer cells (graft-versus-tumor effect). Sometimes the transplanted cells from a donor can also make an immune response against the body's normal cells. Giving tacrolimus, methotrexate, and sirolimus after the transplant may stop this from happening. It is not yet known whether tacrolimus and methotrexate are more effective with or without sirolimus in preventing graft-versus-host disease.
Detailed description
PRIMARY OBJECTIVES:
- Compare the post-transplant 2-year event-free survival of pediatric patients with intermediate-risk or high-risk acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) in second complete remission or high risk ALL in first remission undergoing allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation treated with graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) prophylaxis comprising tacrolimus and methotrexate with or without sirolimus.
SECONDARY OBJECTIVES:
- Compare rates of relapses, transplant-related mortality, and acute and chronic GVHD in these patients.
II. Evaluate the relative contribution of resistance by ALL blasts to cytolytic therapy (e.g., chemotherapy/irradiation) as a cause of relapse post-transplantation by correlating ALL in vivo blast resistance with in vivo sirolimus, inhibition levels of the mTOR pathway in patients treated with sirolimus, and altered resistance pathways in ALL blasts measured by microarray analysis.
III. Evaluate the relative contribution of resistance by ALL blasts to the donor immune response as a cause of relapse post-transplantation by correlating the development of donor anti-ALL T-cell response, the development of acute and/or chronic GVHD, and the detection of altered ALL blast immunogenicity after transplant with increased minimal residual disease, persistent recipient chimerism, and relapse.
OUTLINE: This is a randomized, open-label, multicenter study. Patients are stratified according to specific combinations of risk (intermediate CR2 vs high CR2 vs high CR1), donor type (matched sibling vs unrelated or other related), and stem cell source (filgrastim [G-CSF]-primed bone marrow vs unprimed bone marrow vs bone marrow vs peripheral blood vs umbilical cord blood).
PREPARATIVE REGIMEN: Patients undergo total-body irradiation twice daily on days -8 to -6 and receive thiotepa IV on days -5 and -4 and cyclophosphamide IV on days -3 and -2.
ALLOGENEIC HEMATOPOIETIC STEM CELL TRANSPLANTATION: Patients undergo allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation on day 0.
GRAFT-VERSUS-HOST DISEASE (GVHD) PROPHYLAXIS: Patients are randomized to 1 of 2 treatment arms.
ARM I: (experimental) Patients receive tacrolimus IV continuously or orally (when able) daily beginning on day -2 followed by a taper beginning on day 42 and continuing until day 98 (for patients undergoing matched sibling donor transplantation) OR tacrolimus IV continuously or orally daily beginning on day -2 followed by a taper beginning on day 100 and continuing until day 180 (for patients undergoing related, unrelated, or cord blood donor transplantation) in the absence of GVHD. Patients also receive methotrexate IV on days 1, 3, and 6 (for patients with matched sibling and umbilical cord blood donors) OR days 1, 3, 6, and 11 (for patients with unrelated bone marrow and peripheral blood stem cell donors) and oral sirolimus daily beginning on day 0 followed by a taper beginning on day 180 and continuing until day 207.
ARM II: (control) Patients receive tacrolimus and methotrexate as in arm I.
After completion of study treatment, patients are followed periodically for approximately 5 years.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Tacro-MTX/Sirolimus GVHD Prophylaxis Regimen | Experimental | Drug: thiotepa, Drug: cyclophosphamide, Drug: tacrolimus, Drug: methotrexate, Drug: sirolimus, Radiation: total body irradiationPreparative regimen of total body irradiation (TBI) 200 cGy BID days -8,-7, \& -6, Thiotepa IV (dose 5 mg/kg/day on days -5 \& -4) \& cyclophosphamide IV (dose 60 mg/kg/day on days -3 \& -2). Tacrolimus IV (dose 0.02 mg/kg/day) continuously or orally daily on day -2 with a taper starting on day 42 - day 98 (patients undergoing matched sibling donor transplantation) OR tacrolimus IV (dose 0.02 mg/kg/day) continuously or orally daily beginning on day -2 followed by a taper on day 100 through day 180 (patients undergoing other related, unrelated, or cord blood donor transplantation) in the absence of GVHD. Patients also receive methotrexate IV (5 mg/m2/dose) on days 1,3, \& 6 (patients with matched sibling and umbilical cord blood donors) OR days 1,3 6, \& 11 (patients with other related/unrelated bone marrow and peripheral blood stem cell donors) and oral sirolimus (dose 2.5mg/m2/day - 4 mg max starting dose) daily starting on day 0 followed by a taper starting on day 180 through day 207. |
| Tacro-MTX GVHD Prophylaxis | Active comparator | Drug: thiotepa, Drug: cyclophosphamide, Drug: tacrolimus, Drug: methotrexate, Radiation: total body irradiationPreparative regimen of total body irradiation (TBI) 200 cGy BID days -8,-7, \& -6, Thiotepa IV (dose 5 mg/kg/day on days -5 \& -4) \& cyclophosphamide IV (dose 60 mg/kg/day on days -3 \& -2). Tacrolimus IV (dose 0.02 mg/kg/day) continuously or orally (when able) daily on day -2 with a taper starting on day 42 - day 98 (patients undergoing matched sibling donor transplantation) OR tacrolimus IV (dose 0.02 mg/kg/day) continuously or orally daily beginning on day -2 followed by a taper on day 100 through day 180 (patients undergoing other related, unrelated, or cord blood donor transplantation) in the absence of GVHD. Patients also receive methotrexate IV (5 mg/m2/dose) on days 1,3, \& 6 (patients with matched sibling and umbilical cord blood donors) OR days 1,3 6, \& 11 (patients with other related/unrelated bone marrow and peripheral blood stem cell donors). |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 1 year to 21 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Child, Adult
Key inclusion criteria (39 listed)
- Histologically or cytologically confirmed acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) in second complete remission (CR2) (M1 bone marrow, < 5% blasts by morphology) meeting the following criteria:
- Enrolled on an appropriate COG relapsed ALL clinical trial after completing the required study therapy (i.e., minimum 1 re-induction course (4-6 weeks) and 1 round of intensive consolidation chemotherapy (3-6 weeks). Patients with high risk ALL in CR1 are eligible as soon as they have achieved a CR.
- No B-cell ALL L3 morphology with evidence of myc translocation by molecular or cytogenetic technique
- No Down syndrome
- No evidence of active CNS or other extramedullary disease (i.e., no CNS2)
Key exclusion criteria (0 listed)
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| thiotepaAlso: Oncotiotepa, STEPA, TESPA, TespaminGiven IV | Drug | Tacro-MTX GVHD Prophylaxis, Tacro-MTX/Sirolimus GVHD Prophylaxis Regimen |
| cyclophosphamideAlso: CPM, CTX, Cytoxan, EndoxanGiven IV | Drug | Tacro-MTX GVHD Prophylaxis, Tacro-MTX/Sirolimus GVHD Prophylaxis Regimen |
| tacrolimusAlso: FK 506, PrografGiven IV or orally | Drug | Tacro-MTX GVHD Prophylaxis, Tacro-MTX/Sirolimus GVHD Prophylaxis Regimen |
| methotrexateAlso: amethopterin, Folex, methylaminopterin, MexateGiven IV | Drug | Tacro-MTX GVHD Prophylaxis, Tacro-MTX/Sirolimus GVHD Prophylaxis Regimen |
| sirolimusAlso: AY 22989, Rapamune, rapamycin, SLMGiven orally | Drug | Tacro-MTX/Sirolimus GVHD Prophylaxis Regimen |
| total body irradiationAlso: TBIPart of the transplant preparatory regimen | Radiation | Tacro-MTX GVHD Prophylaxis, Tacro-MTX/Sirolimus GVHD Prophylaxis Regimen |
Primary outcome
Estimated Percentage of Participants With Event Free Survival
Time frame: at 2 years
An event is defined as relapse or transplant-related mortality. Relapse is defined in section 3.3 study protocol.
8 secondary outcomes
Rate of Relapses
Time frame: At 2 years
Estimated Transplant Related Mortality Percentage
Time frame: 100 days
Estimated Rate of Acute Graft VS Host Disease (GVHD)
Time frame: At 200 days
Estimated Rate of Overall Chronic Graft VS Host Disease
Time frame: At 2 years
Relative Contribution of Resistance by Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia (ALL) Blasts to Cytolytic Therapy (e.g., Chemotherapy/Irradiation) as a Cause of Relapse Post-transplantation
Time frame: Up to 1 year
Relative Contribution of ALL Blasts to the Donor Immune Response as a Cause of Relapse Post Transplantation (Correlating Development of aGVHD With Relapse)
Time frame: At 1 year
Relative Contribution of ALL Blasts to the Donor Immune Response as a Cause of Relapse Pre-Transplantation (MRD)
Time frame: At 2 months
Chimerism
Time frame: Up to 12 months
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 7 Aug 2019.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 25862561Pulsipher MA, Carlson C, Langholz B, Wall DA, Schultz KR, Bunin N, Kirsch I, Gastier-Foster JM, Borowitz M, Desmarais C, Williamson D, Kalos M, Grupp SA. IgH-V(D)J NGS-MRD measurement pre- and early post-allotransplant defines very low- and very high-risk ALL patients. Blood. 2015 May 28;125(22):3501-8. doi: 10.1182/blood-2014-12-615757. Epub 2015 Apr 10.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 24497539Pulsipher MA, Langholz B, Wall DA, Schultz KR, Bunin N, Carroll WL, Raetz E, Gardner S, Gastier-Foster JM, Howrie D, Goyal RK, Douglas JG, Borowitz M, Barnes Y, Teachey DT, Taylor C, Grupp SA. The addition of sirolimus to tacrolimus/methotrexate GVHD prophylaxis in children with ALL: a phase 3 Children's Oncology Group/Pediatric Blood and Marrow Transplant Consortium trial. Blood. 2014 Mar 27;123(13):2017-25. doi: 10.1182/blood-2013-10-534297. Epub 2014 Feb 4.
Related trials for B-cell Childhood Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia
RecruitingPhase 1
A Phase I Dose Finding Study of MB-CART2219.1
Lymphoma, CLL
RecruitingObservational study
A Multi-site Study to Evaluate the Persistence of Protective Immunity to Routine Childhood Vaccinations in Participants With B-ALL/Ly Who Have Received Blinatumomab
B-Cell ALL, B-Cell Acute Lymphoblastic Leukaemia
RecruitingPhase 3
International Study for Treatment of Childhood Relapsed Precursor B-Cell ALL 2020 (IntReALL BCP 2020)
B-Cell Acute Lymphoblastic Leukaemia
Not yet recruitingPhase 1/2
A Study of Sonrotoclax (BGB-11417) in Children With Relapsed or Refractory Acute Myeloid Leukemia and B-cell Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia
Relapsed Acute Myeloid Leukemia, Refractory Acute Myeloid Leukemia
Active, not recruitingPhase 2
Combination Chemotherapy With or Without Donor Stem Cell Transplant in Treating Patients With Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia
Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia, Adult B Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Michael Pulsipher, MD principal investigator
Children's Oncology Group
50 sites in 3 countries: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 3 study testing thiotepa, cyclophosphamide and tacrolimus in people with B-cell Childhood Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia and Childhood Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia in Remission, run by Children's Oncology Group at 50 sites in 3 countries.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 39 inclusion and 0 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 7 Aug 2019. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 50 sites in United States, Canada, Australia. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 9 Feb 2017). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Estimated Percentage of Participants With Event Free Survival (time frame: at 2 years). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT00382109, which also lists 2 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 7 Aug 2019.