Arthritis, RheumatoidPhase 2NCT00383188
An Oral p38 Inhibitor Investigating Safety, Efficacy, And PK In Subjects With Active Rheumatoid Arthritis
A Phase 2 study testing PH-797804 in people with Arthritis, Rheumatoid, run by Pfizer at 48 sites in 12 countries.
Trial summary
Investigating the safety and tolerability of a p38 inhibitor as monotherapy in subjects who have failed at least 1 DMARD. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 19 to 90 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Arthritis, Rheumatoid
- What is being tested?
- PH-797804
- Type of treatment
- Pill or oral medicine
- Could I receive a placebo?
- Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
- How many people
- 305 participants
- Where
- 48 sitesin 12 countries
- Study dates
- 15 Dec 2006to 16 Jul 2008
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 19 to 90 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Diagnosed with RA and has failed at least 1 DMARD therapy
Who cannot join
- Any other inflammatory arthritis and any significant history of acute or chronic infection with immunomodulatory etiology.
Trial locations and contacts
48 sites in 12 countries.
48 sites in 12 countries
Czechia6 sites
Fakultni nemocnice u sv. Anny v Brne
Brno, 656 91
Fakultni nemocnice Olomouc
Olomouc, 775 20
NZZ Bormed, s.r.o.
Ostrava - Trebovice, 722 00
Revmatologicky ustav
Prague, 128 50
Fakultni Thomayerova nemocnice s poliklinikou
Prague, 140 59
PV-Medical s.r.o.
Zlín, 760 01
India6 sites
St. John's Medical College Hospital, Department of Orthopedics
Bangalore, Karnataka, 560 034
Kovai Medical Center and Hospital,
Coimbatore, Tamil Nadu, 641 014
Department of Rheumatology, CARE Hospital
Hyderabad, Andhra Pradesh, 500 034
Nizam's Institute of Medical Sciences, Department of Rheumatology
Hyderabad, Andhra Pradesh, 500 082
Dayanand Medical College and Hospital, Department of Orthopedics
Ludhiana, Punjab, 141001
T. N. Medical College and B. Y. L. Nair Ch. HospitalDepartment of Medicine and Rheumatology Clinic
Mumbai, Maharashtra, 400 008
South Africa6 sites
Quinta-Med
Bloemfontein, 9317
St Augustines Medical Ctr 2
Durban, 4001
Office Of Dr. F. Le Clus
Johannesburg, Gauteng, 1619
Clinresco Centres (Pty) Ltd
Kempton Park
Dr S Sankovic
Parktown, Johannesburg, 2193
Intercare Medical and Dental Centre
Pretoria, 0081
Chile5 sites
Hospital Regional de Rancagua
Rancagua, Región del Libertador General Bernardo O’Higgins
Hospital del Salvador
Santiago, RM, 7500922
Office of Dr. Pedro Miranda
Santiago, RM, 8331030
Hospital Clínica San Borja Arriarán
Santiago, RM, 8360156
Hospital Gustavo Fricke
Viña del Mar, Valparaiso, 2570017
Russia5 sites
City Hospital #4, Department of Therapy of Moscow Faculty of Russian State Medical University
Moscow, 115093
Clinical Hospital #7
Moscow, 115446
City Hospital # 28 "Maximilianovskaya"
Saint Petersburg, 190000
St. Petersburg Clnical Hospital n.a. Sokolov (MSCh #122)
Saint Petersburg, 194291
Smolensk State Medical Academy
Smolensk, 214019
Brazil4 sites
Centro de Estudos em Terapias Inovadoras
Curitiba, Paraná, 80060-240
Hospital de Clínicas da UFPR
Curitiba, Paraná, 80060-900
Escola Paulista de Medicina - EPM
São Paulo, São Paulo, 04026-000
Hospital Heliópolis - PAM
São Paulo, São Paulo, 04230-000
Poland4 sites
SP ZOZ Wojewodzki Szpital Zespolony im. Jedrzeja Sniadeckiego
Bialystok, 15-950
Centrum Osteoporozy i Chorob Kostno-Stawowych
Bialystok, 16-461
Poznanski Osrodek Medyczny
Poznan, 60-773
Centrum Badan Klinicznych
Warsaw, 02-256
South Korea4 sites
Hallym University Sacred Heart Hospital/Rheumatology, Internal Medicine
Anyang, 431-070
Yonsei University College of Medicine, Severance Hospital, Rheumatology, Internal Medicine
Seoul, 120-752
Hanyang University Hospital, Department of Rheumatology
Seoul, 133-792
The Catholic University of Korea, Kangnam St. Mary's Hospital/ Rheumatology, Internal Medicine
Seoul
Peru3 sites
Instituto Peruano del Hueso y la Articulación SAC.
Lima, L-27
Instituto Peruano del Climaterio
Lima, L27
Instituto de Ginecologia y Reproduccion
Lima, L33
Estonia2 sites
East Tallinn Central Hospital
Tallinn, 11312
North Estonia Regional Hospital
Tallinn, 13419
Spain2 sites
Hospital de Cruces
Barakaldo, Vizcaya, 48903
Hospital Nuestra Señora de Valme
Seville, 41014
About this study
Official title: A 12-WEEK, PHASE 2A, RANDOMIZED, DOUBLE-BLIND, PLACEBO-CONTROLLED STUDY TO INVESTIGATE THE SAFETY, PHARMACOKINETICS, AND EFFICACY OF PH 797804, ADMINISTERED ORALLY ONCE DAILY IN SUBJECTS WITH ACTIVE RHEUMATOID ARTHRITIS
Investigating the safety and tolerability of a p38 inhibitor as monotherapy in subjects who have failed at least 1 DMARD.
- Conditions
- Arthritis, Rheumatoid
- Being tested
- placebo, PH-797804
- Keywords
- Arthritis, Rheumatoid
- Medical subject headings
- Arthritis, Rheumatoid, Arthritis
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
placeboDrug
Capsule, once daily (QD) for 12 weeks
PH-797804Drug
Capsule, 0.5 mg of PH-797804, once daily (QD) for 12 weeks
PH-797804Drug
Capsule, 3 mg of PH-797804, once daily (QD) for 12 weeks
PH-797804Drug
Capsule, 6 mg of PH-797804, once daily (QD) for 12 weeks
PH-797804Drug
Capsule, 10 mg of PH-797804, once daily (QD) for 12 weeks
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Placebo comparator | Not described Receives: Drug: placebo |
| 2 | Experimental | Not described Receives: Drug: PH-797804 |
| 3 | Experimental | Not described Receives: Drug: PH-797804 |
| 4 | Experimental | Not described Receives: Drug: PH-797804 |
| 5 | Experimental | Not described Receives: Drug: PH-797804 |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Percentage of Participants Achieving American College of Rheumatology 20 Percent (%) (ACR 20) Response at Week 12
ACR20 responders: participants with greater than or equal to(>=)20% improvement in tender and swollen 28-joint counts from baseline, >=20% improvement in at least 3 of 5 measures: Patient's global assessment of arthritis(PGA), physician's global assessment of arthritis, participant's assessment of pain on visual analogue scale (Pain-VAS), health assessment questionnaire-disability index (HAQ-DI), C-reactive protein (CRP) in mg/liter (mg/L). PGA:participant assess overall disease activity on VAS, score:0(no arthritis) to 100(extreme arthritis), high score=more arthritis. Physician's global assessment:physician judge participant's overall disease activity on VAS, score:0(no arthritis) to 100millimeter(mm) (extreme arthritis), high score=more arthritis. Pain-VAS:participant assess arthritis pain on 100mm VAS, score:0mm (no pain) to 100mm (extreme pain), high score=more pain. HAQ-DI:functional disability evaluation, score:0 (no difficulty) to 3 (unable to do), high score=more disability.
Measured: Week 12
Secondary outcomes (22)
Percentage of Participants Achieving American College of Rheumatology 20 Percent (%) (ACR 20) Response at Weeks 1, 2, 4, 8 and 16
ACR20 responders: participants with greater than or equal to(>=)20% improvement in tender and swollen 28-joint counts from baseline, >=20% improvement in at least 3 of 5 measures: Patient's global assessment of arthritis(PGA), physician's global assessment of arthritis, participant's assessment of pain on visual analogue scale (Pain-VAS), health assessment questionnaire-disability index (HAQ-DI), C-reactive protein (CRP) in mg/L. PGA:participant assess overall disease activity on VAS, score:0(no arthritis) to 100(extreme arthritis), high score=more arthritis. Physician's global assessment:physician judge participant's overall disease activity on VAS, score:0(no arthritis) to 100millimeter(mm) (extreme arthritis), high score=more arthritis. Pain-VAS:participant assessed arthritis pain on 100mm VAS, score:0mm (no pain) to 100mm (extreme pain), high score=more pain. HAQ-DI:functional disability evaluation, score:0 (no difficulty) to 3 (unable to do), high score=more disability.
Measured: Weeks 1, 2, 4, 8, 16
Percentage of Participants Achieving American College of Rheumatology 50 Percent (%) (ACR 50) Response at Weeks 1, 2, 4, 8, 12 and 16
ACR50 responders: participants with >= 50% improvement in tender and swollen 28-joint counts from baseline and >= 50% improvement in at least 3 of the 5 measures: PGA, physician global assessment, Pain-VAS, HAQ-DI and C-reactive protein (in mg/L). PGA: participant assessed overall disease activity on VAS, score: 0 (no arthritis) to 100 (extreme arthritis), higher score=more arthritis. Physician global assessment: physician judged participant's overall disease activity on VAS, score: 0 (no arthritis) to 100 mm VAS (extreme arthritis), higher score=more arthritis. Pain-VAS: participant assessed arthritis pain by 100 mm VAS, score: 0 mm (no pain) to 100 mm (extreme pain), higher score=more pain. HAQ-DI: functional disability evaluation, score: 0 (no difficulty) to 3 (unable to do), higher score=more disability.
Measured: Weeks 1, 2, 4, 8, 12 and 16
Percentage of Participants Achieving American College of Rheumatology 70 Percent (%) (ACR 70) Response at Weeks 1, 2, 4, 8, 12 and 16
ACR70 responders: participants with >=70% improvement in tender and swollen 28-joint counts from baseline and >= 70% improvement in at least 3 of the 5 measures: PGA, physician global assessment, Pain-VAS, HAQ-DI and CRP (in mg/L). PGA: participant assessed overall disease activity on VAS, score: 0 (no arthritis) to 100 (extreme arthritis), higher score=more arthritis. Physician global assessment: physician judged participant's overall disease activity on VAS, score: 0 (no arthritis) to 100 mm VAS (extreme arthritis), higher score=more arthritis. Pain-VAS: participant assessed arthritis pain by 100 mm VAS, score: 0 mm (no pain) to 100 mm (extreme pain), higher score=more pain. HAQ-DI: functional disability evaluation, score: 0 (no difficulty) to 3 (unable to do), higher score=more disability.
Measured: Weeks 1, 2, 4, 8, 12 and 16
Change From Baseline in Tender/Painful Joint Count at Weeks 1, 2, 4, 8, 12 and 16
A total of 28 tender/painful joints were assessed for tenderness or pain. The 28 joints included: shoulders, elbows, wrists, metacarpophalangeal (MCP) joints, proximal interphalangeal (PIP) joints, and knees. Artificial joints were not assessed.
Measured: Baseline, Weeks 1, 2, 4, 8, 12 and 16
Change From Baseline in Swollen Joint Count at Weeks 1, 2, 4, 8, 12 and 16
A total of 28 swollen joints were assessed. The 28 joints included: shoulders, elbows, wrists, MCP joints, PIP joints, and knees. Artificial joints were not assessed.
Measured: Baseline, Weeks 1, 2, 4, 8, 12 and 16
Change From Baseline in Participant Assessment of Arthritis Pain at Weeks 1, 2, 4, 8, 12 and 16
Participants self-assessed the severity of arthritis pain using a 100 mm VAS between 0 mm (no pain) and 100 mm (most severe pain), where higher scores indicate higher degree of pain intensity.
Measured: Baseline, Weeks 1, 2, 4, 8, 12 and 16
Change From Baseline in Participant Global Assessment (PGA) of Arthritis at Weeks 1, 2, 4, 8 12 and 16
Participants responded to the question "Considering all the ways your arthritis affects you, how are you feeling today?" was recorded using a 0-100 mm VAS where 0 mm (very well) and 100 mm (very poor). Higher scores indicated worse condition.
Measured: Baseline, Week 1, 2, 4, 8, 12 and 16
Change From Baseline in Physician Global Assessment of Arthritis at Weeks 1, 2, 4, 8, 12 and 16
Physician assessed the overall impact of arthritis on the participants' daily life based on the disease signs, functional capacity and physical examination. The physician's response was recorded using a 100 mm VAS between 0 mm (very good) and 100 mm (very poor). Higher scores indicating worse condition of arthritis.
Measured: Baseline, Week 1, 2, 4, 8, 12 and 16
Change From Baseline in C-Reactive Protein (CRP) at Weeks 1, 2, 4, 8, 12 and 16
C-reactive protein is a biochemical measure of inflammation and disease activity.
Measured: Baseline, Week 1, 2, 4, 8, 12 and 16
Change From Baseline in Disease Activity Score in 28 Joints Using 4 Variables (DAS28-4 [CRP]) at Weeks 1, 2, 4, 8, 12 and 16
DAS28-4 (CRP) was calculated from 28-tender joint count and 28-swollen joint count, C-reactive protein (mg/L) and PGA : participant assessed overall disease activity on VAS, score:0(no arthritis) to 100(extreme arthritis). DAS28-4 (CRP) lower than (<) 3.2 implied mild disease activity, 3.2 to 5.1 implied moderate disease activity and greater than (>) 5.1 severe disease activity. Total score range: 0 to 9.4, higher score indicated more disease activity.
Measured: Baseline, Weeks 1, 2, 4, 8, 12 and 16
Number of Participants Who Withdrew From Study Due to Lack of Efficacy
Measured: Baseline up to Week 16
Change From Baseline in Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (HAQ-DI) Score at Weeks 1, 2, 4, 8, 12 and 16
HAQ-DI: participant-reported assessment of ability to perform tasks in 8 categories of daily living activities: dressing/grooming, arising, eating, walking, reaching, gripping, hygiene, and "other common activities" over past week. Each item scored on 4-point scale from 0 to 3: 0= no difficulty; 1= some difficulty; 2= much difficulty; 3= unable to do. Overall score was computed as the sum of domain scores and divided by the number of domains answered. Total average possible score range 0 (least difficulty) to 3 (extreme difficulty), where higher scores indicate more difficulty while performing daily living activities.
Measured: Baseline, Week 1, 2, 4, 8, 12 and 16
Change From Baseline in Modified Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form (mBPI-SF) Score at Weeks 1, 2, 4, 8 and 12
The modified brief pain inventory-short form (mBPI-SF) is a pain assessment tool used to measure both pain intensity and pain interference using an 11-point numeric rating scale. Participants rated their pain severity, using a scale from 0 (no pain) to 10 (pain as bad as you can imagine), where higher scores indicate greater intensity of pain. Participants also rated the level of pain interference using a scale from 0 (no interference) to 10 (complete interference), where higher scores indicate more degree of interference in general daily activities.
Measured: Baseline, Week 1, 2, 4, 8 and 12
Change From Baseline in 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) Version 2 at Weeks 4 and 12
The SF-36 version 2 is a 36-item generic health status measure standardized survey is a standardized survey evaluating 8 domains of functional health and well-being: physical functioning (PF), role physical (RP), bodily pain (BP), general health (GH), vitality (VT), social functioning (SF), role emotional (RE) and mental health (MH). The summary score of these concepts is summarized as Physical component summary (PCS) score and Mental component summary (MCS) score, are based on a normalized sum of the 8 scale scores PF, RP, BP, GH, VT, SF, RE, and MH. The score for each of 8 domains were scaled from 0 (lowest level of functioning) to100 (highest level of functioning, where higher scores represented better level of functioning. 8 domains were summarized as 2 summary scores; PCS and MCS. Score range for each of the 2 summary scores = 0 (lowest level of functioning) to 100 (highest level of functioning), where higher scores represented better level of functioning.
Measured: Baseline, Weeks 4, 12
Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)
An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant who received study drug without regard to possibility of causal relationship. SAE was an AE resulting in any of the following outcomes or deemed significant for any other reason: death; initial or prolonged inpatient hospitalization; life threatening experience (immediate risk of dying); persistent or significant disability/incapacity; congenital anomaly. Treatment-emergent events are events between first dose of study drug and up to week 16 after last dose that were absent before treatment or that worsened relative to pretreatment state. AEs included both serious and non-serious AEs.
Measured: Baseline up to Week 16
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities
Haemoglobin, haematocrit, red blood cell count less than(<) 0.8*lower limit of normal [LLN], platelets <0.5*LLN and (\&) greater than(>) 1.75*ULN, white blood cell count <0.6*LLN\&>1.5x ULN, lymphocytes <0.8*LLN\&>1.2*ULN, total neutrophils <0.8*LLN\&>1.2*ULN, basophils, eosinophils, monocytes >1.2*ULN; total bilirubin >1.5*ULN, aspartate aminotransferase, alanine aminotransferase, gamma glutamyl transferase, alkaline phosphatase >3.0*ULN, total protein <0.8*LLN\&>1.2*ULN, albumin <0.8*LLN\&>1.2*ULN; blood urea nitrogen, Creatinine, Uric Acid >1.2*ULN; Cholesterol >1.3*ULN, HDL Cholesterol <0.8*LLN, LDL Cholesterol >1.2*ULN, Triglycerides >1.3*ULN; Electrolytes: sodium <0.95*LLN\&>1.05*ULN, potassium <0.9*LLN\&>1.1*ULN, chloride, calcium, magnesium, bicarbonate <0.9*LLN\&>1.1*ULN, phosphate <0.8*LLN\&>1.2x ULN; glucose <0.6*LLN\&>1.5*ULN, human chorionic gonadotrophin >0; CRP >1.25*ULN, ([urine-RBC, WBC, epithelial cells, crystals, yeast cells] >=6), urine casts >1, urine Bacteria >20.
Measured: Baseline up to Week 16
Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Vital Signs Abnormalities
Pre-defined criteria for vital sign abnormalities: Maximum (max) increase from baseline in supine systolic blood pressure (SBP) >=30 milliliters of mercury (mmHg), maximum increase from baseline in supine diastolic blood pressure (DBP) >=20 mmHg.
Measured: Baseline up to Week 16
Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Changes From Baseline in 12-Lead Electrocardiogram (ECG) Parameters
12-lead ECG were performed after the participant had rested quietly for at least 10 minutes in a supine position. ECG parameters included RR interval, PR interval, QRS complex, QT interval, corrected QT (QTc) interval, Bazett's correction QT (QTcB) interval, Heart Rate and Fridericia's correction (QTcF) interval. Clinical significance of 12-Lead ECG was judged by investigator.
Measured: Baseline up to Week 16
Number of Participants With Electrocardiogram (ECG) Abnormalities
Criteria for ECG abnormalities: maximum QT interval (millisecond [msec]): < 450, 450 to <480, 480 to <500, >= 500; maximum QT interval with Bazett's correction (QTcB interval) (msec): <450, 450 to <480, 480 to <500, >=500; maximum QT interval with Fridericia's correction (QTcF interval) (msec): <450, 450 to <480, 480 to <500, >=500; maximum QTc interval increase from baseline (msec): change <30, 30 <=change <60, change >=60.
Measured: Baseline up to Week 16
Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Physical Examination Abnormalities
Following criteria and body systems were examined to identify the clinically significant physical examination abnormalities; general appearance, skin (presence of rash), head, ears, eyes, nose, and throat, lungs (auscultation), heart (auscultation for presence of murmurs, gallops, rubs, peripheral edema), abdominal (palpation and auscultation), neurologic (mental status, station, gait, reflexes, motor and sensory function, coordination). Physical examination abnormalities were as determined by the investigator.
Measured: Baseline up to Week 16
Minimum Observed Plasma Pre-dose Concentration (Ctrough Min) of Steady State
Measured: Predose
Number of Participants With Concomitant Medications
Concomitant medication (any medication other than, and in addition to, the study medication) taken for any period of time during the study and was coded by World Health Organization (WHO) medical dictionary.
Measured: Baseline up to Week 16
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted2 Oct 2006 (estimated)
- Study start15 Dec 2006
- Primary completion1 Jul 2008
- Study completion16 Jul 2008
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Other trials for Arthritis, RheumatoidStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by PfizerThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Quadruple blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 305 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Pfizer
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Pfizer CT.gov Call Center, Study director, Pfizer
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00383188
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- A6631007
- Other IDs
- 2006-003577-27, RA POC
- Status last verified
- Jul 2021
- First submitted
- 28 Sep 2006
- Last updated
- 20 Aug 2021
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- Individual data sharing
- Yes: Pfizer will provide access to individual de-identified participant data and related study documents (e.g. protocol, Statistical Analysis Plan (SAP), Clinical Study Report (CSR)) upon request from qualified researchers, and subject to certain criteria, conditions, and exceptions. Further details on Pfizer's data sharing criteria and process for requesting access can be found at: https://www.pfizer.com/science/clinical\_trials/trial\_data\_and\_results/data\_requests.
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 20 Aug 2021. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- A 12-WEEK, PHASE 2A, RANDOMIZED, DOUBLE-BLIND, PLACEBO-CONTROLLED STUDY TO INVESTIGATE THE SAFETY, PHARMACOKINETICS, AND EFFICACY OF PH 797804, ADMINISTERED ORALLY ONCE DAILY IN SUBJECTS WITH ACTIVE RHEUMATOID ARTHRITIS
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00383188
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- A6631007
- Conditions
- Arthritis, Rheumatoid
- Keywords
- Arthritis, Rheumatoid
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 305 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- PfizerIndustry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Study start
- 15 Dec 2006 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 1 Jul 2008 (actual)
- Study completion
- 16 Jul 2008 (actual)
- First posted
- 2 Oct 2006 (estimated)
- Results
- Posted 20 Aug 2021
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Investigating the safety and tolerability of a p38 inhibitor as monotherapy in subjects who have failed at least 1 DMARD.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Quadruple blind (participant, care provider, investigator, outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 5
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Placebo comparator | Drug: placebo |
| 2 | Experimental | Drug: PH-797804 |
| 3 | Experimental | Drug: PH-797804 |
| 4 | Experimental | Drug: PH-797804 |
| 5 | Experimental | Drug: PH-797804 |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 19 to 90 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (1 listed)
- Diagnosed with RA and has failed at least 1 DMARD therapy
Key exclusion criteria (1 listed)
- Any other inflammatory arthritis and any significant history of acute or chronic infection with immunomodulatory etiology.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| placeboCapsule, once daily (QD) for 12 weeks | Drug | 1 |
| PH-797804Capsule, 0.5 mg of PH-797804, once daily (QD) for 12 weeks | Drug | 2 |
| PH-797804Capsule, 3 mg of PH-797804, once daily (QD) for 12 weeks | Drug | 3 |
| PH-797804Capsule, 6 mg of PH-797804, once daily (QD) for 12 weeks | Drug | 4 |
| PH-797804Capsule, 10 mg of PH-797804, once daily (QD) for 12 weeks | Drug | 5 |
Primary outcome
Percentage of Participants Achieving American College of Rheumatology 20 Percent (%) (ACR 20) Response at Week 12
Time frame: Week 12
ACR20 responders: participants with greater than or equal to(>=)20% improvement in tender and swollen 28-joint counts from baseline, >=20% improvement in at least 3 of 5 measures: Patient's global assessment of arthritis(PGA), physician's global assessment of arthritis, participant's assessment of pain on visual analogue scale (Pain-VAS), health assessment questionnaire-disability index (HAQ-DI), C-reactive protein (CRP) in mg/liter (mg/L). PGA:participant assess overall disease activity on VAS, score:0(no arthritis) to 100(extreme arthritis), high score=more arthritis. Physician's global assessment:physician judge participant's overall disease activity on VAS, score:0(no arthritis) to 100millimeter(mm) (extreme arthritis), high score=more arthritis. Pain-VAS:participant assess arthritis pain on 100mm VAS, score:0mm (no pain) to 100mm (extreme pain), high score=more pain. HAQ-DI:functional disability evaluation, score:0 (no difficulty) to 3 (unable to do), high score=more disability.
22 secondary outcomes
Percentage of Participants Achieving American College of Rheumatology 20 Percent (%) (ACR 20) Response at Weeks 1, 2, 4, 8 and 16
Time frame: Weeks 1, 2, 4, 8, 16
Percentage of Participants Achieving American College of Rheumatology 50 Percent (%) (ACR 50) Response at Weeks 1, 2, 4, 8, 12 and 16
Time frame: Weeks 1, 2, 4, 8, 12 and 16
Percentage of Participants Achieving American College of Rheumatology 70 Percent (%) (ACR 70) Response at Weeks 1, 2, 4, 8, 12 and 16
Time frame: Weeks 1, 2, 4, 8, 12 and 16
Change From Baseline in Tender/Painful Joint Count at Weeks 1, 2, 4, 8, 12 and 16
Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 1, 2, 4, 8, 12 and 16
Change From Baseline in Swollen Joint Count at Weeks 1, 2, 4, 8, 12 and 16
Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 1, 2, 4, 8, 12 and 16
Change From Baseline in Participant Assessment of Arthritis Pain at Weeks 1, 2, 4, 8, 12 and 16
Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 1, 2, 4, 8, 12 and 16
Change From Baseline in Participant Global Assessment (PGA) of Arthritis at Weeks 1, 2, 4, 8 12 and 16
Time frame: Baseline, Week 1, 2, 4, 8, 12 and 16
Change From Baseline in Physician Global Assessment of Arthritis at Weeks 1, 2, 4, 8, 12 and 16
Time frame: Baseline, Week 1, 2, 4, 8, 12 and 16
Change From Baseline in C-Reactive Protein (CRP) at Weeks 1, 2, 4, 8, 12 and 16
Time frame: Baseline, Week 1, 2, 4, 8, 12 and 16
Change From Baseline in Disease Activity Score in 28 Joints Using 4 Variables (DAS28-4 [CRP]) at Weeks 1, 2, 4, 8, 12 and 16
Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 1, 2, 4, 8, 12 and 16
Number of Participants Who Withdrew From Study Due to Lack of Efficacy
Time frame: Baseline up to Week 16
Change From Baseline in Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (HAQ-DI) Score at Weeks 1, 2, 4, 8, 12 and 16
Time frame: Baseline, Week 1, 2, 4, 8, 12 and 16
Change From Baseline in Modified Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form (mBPI-SF) Score at Weeks 1, 2, 4, 8 and 12
Time frame: Baseline, Week 1, 2, 4, 8 and 12
Change From Baseline in 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) Version 2 at Weeks 4 and 12
Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 4, 12
Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)
Time frame: Baseline up to Week 16
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities
Time frame: Baseline up to Week 16
Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Vital Signs Abnormalities
Time frame: Baseline up to Week 16
Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Changes From Baseline in 12-Lead Electrocardiogram (ECG) Parameters
Time frame: Baseline up to Week 16
Number of Participants With Electrocardiogram (ECG) Abnormalities
Time frame: Baseline up to Week 16
Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Physical Examination Abnormalities
Time frame: Baseline up to Week 16
Minimum Observed Plasma Pre-dose Concentration (Ctrough Min) of Steady State
Time frame: Predose
Number of Participants With Concomitant Medications
Time frame: Baseline up to Week 16
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 20 Aug 2021.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- To obtain contact information for a study center near you, click here.Link provided by the sponsor.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Yes. Pfizer will provide access to individual de-identified participant data and related study documents (e.g. protocol, Statistical Analysis Plan (SAP), Clinical Study Report (CSR)) upon request from qualified researchers, and subject to certain criteria, conditions, and exceptions. Further details on Pfizer's data sharing criteria and process for requesting access can be found at: https://www.pfizer.com/science/clinical_trials/trial_data_and_results/data_requests.
Related trials for Arthritis, Rheumatoid
RecruitingPhase 2
Study of PTC844 in Participants With Active Rheumatoid Arthritis
Rheumatoid Arthritis
Not yet recruitingPhase 1
An Ascending Dose Study of DKB903 in Participants With Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA) and Participants With Systemic Lupus Erythematosus (SLE)
Rheumatoid Arthritis and Systemic Lupus Erythematosus
Not yet recruitingPhase 1
R-2487 in Patients With Sjogren's Syndrome (SjD)
Sjogren's Syndrome, Sjögren
RecruitingPhase 1
A Trial in Healthy Adult Participants and Adults With Autoimmune Diseases to Test How HBM7020 is Tolerated and How it Behaves in the Body
Rheumatoid Arthritis, Systemic Lupus Erythematosus
Active, not recruitingPhase 2
A Study Evaluating the Safety and Efficacy of Inhaled AP01 in Participants With Progressive Pulmonary Fibrosis
Pulmonary Fibrosis, Progressive Pulmonary Fibrosis
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Pfizer CT.gov Call Center study director
Pfizer
48 sites in 12 countries: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 2 study testing PH-797804 in people with Arthritis, Rheumatoid, run by Pfizer at 48 sites in 12 countries.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 20 Aug 2021. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 48 sites in Czechia, India, South Africa, Chile, Russia and 7 more countries. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 20 Aug 2021). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Percentage of Participants Achieving American College of Rheumatology 20 Percent (%) (ACR 20) Response at Week 12 (time frame: Week 12). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 20 Aug 2021.