AzTrials
AzTrials

Arthritis, RheumatoidPhase 2NCT00383188

An Oral p38 Inhibitor Investigating Safety, Efficacy, And PK In Subjects With Active Rheumatoid Arthritis

A Phase 2 study testing PH-797804 in people with Arthritis, Rheumatoid, run by Pfizer at 48 sites in 12 countries.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Investigating the safety and tolerability of a p38 inhibitor as monotherapy in subjects who have failed at least 1 DMARD. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 19 to 90 years
Conditions the study is for
Arthritis, Rheumatoid
What is being tested?
PH-797804
Type of treatment
Pill or oral medicine
Could I receive a placebo?
Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
How many people
305 participants
Where
48 sitesin 12 countries
Study dates
15 Dec 2006to 16 Jul 2008
Phase
Phase 2
Are there results?
Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 19 to 90 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Diagnosed with RA and has failed at least 1 DMARD therapy

Who cannot join

  • Any other inflammatory arthritis and any significant history of acute or chronic infection with immunomodulatory etiology.

Trial locations and contacts

48 sites in 12 countries.

48 sites in 12 countries

Czechia6 sites
  • Fakultni nemocnice u sv. Anny v Brne

    Brno, 656 91

  • Fakultni nemocnice Olomouc

    Olomouc, 775 20

  • NZZ Bormed, s.r.o.

    Ostrava - Trebovice, 722 00

  • Revmatologicky ustav

    Prague, 128 50

  • Fakultni Thomayerova nemocnice s poliklinikou

    Prague, 140 59

  • PV-Medical s.r.o.

    Zlín, 760 01

Other trials in Czechia

India6 sites
  • St. John's Medical College Hospital, Department of Orthopedics

    Bangalore, Karnataka, 560 034

  • Kovai Medical Center and Hospital,

    Coimbatore, Tamil Nadu, 641 014

  • Department of Rheumatology, CARE Hospital

    Hyderabad, Andhra Pradesh, 500 034

  • Nizam's Institute of Medical Sciences, Department of Rheumatology

    Hyderabad, Andhra Pradesh, 500 082

  • Dayanand Medical College and Hospital, Department of Orthopedics

    Ludhiana, Punjab, 141001

  • T. N. Medical College and B. Y. L. Nair Ch. HospitalDepartment of Medicine and Rheumatology Clinic

    Mumbai, Maharashtra, 400 008

Other trials in India

South Africa6 sites
  • Quinta-Med

    Bloemfontein, 9317

  • St Augustines Medical Ctr 2

    Durban, 4001

  • Office Of Dr. F. Le Clus

    Johannesburg, Gauteng, 1619

  • Clinresco Centres (Pty) Ltd

    Kempton Park

  • Dr S Sankovic

    Parktown, Johannesburg, 2193

  • Intercare Medical and Dental Centre

    Pretoria, 0081

Other trials in South Africa

Chile5 sites
  • Hospital Regional de Rancagua

    Rancagua, Región del Libertador General Bernardo O’Higgins

  • Hospital del Salvador

    Santiago, RM, 7500922

  • Office of Dr. Pedro Miranda

    Santiago, RM, 8331030

  • Hospital Clínica San Borja Arriarán

    Santiago, RM, 8360156

  • Hospital Gustavo Fricke

    Viña del Mar, Valparaiso, 2570017

Other trials in Chile

Russia5 sites
  • City Hospital #4, Department of Therapy of Moscow Faculty of Russian State Medical University

    Moscow, 115093

  • Clinical Hospital #7

    Moscow, 115446

  • City Hospital # 28 "Maximilianovskaya"

    Saint Petersburg, 190000

  • St. Petersburg Clnical Hospital n.a. Sokolov (MSCh #122)

    Saint Petersburg, 194291

  • Smolensk State Medical Academy

    Smolensk, 214019

Other trials in Russia

Brazil4 sites
  • Centro de Estudos em Terapias Inovadoras

    Curitiba, Paraná, 80060-240

  • Hospital de Clínicas da UFPR

    Curitiba, Paraná, 80060-900

  • Escola Paulista de Medicina - EPM

    São Paulo, São Paulo, 04026-000

  • Hospital Heliópolis - PAM

    São Paulo, São Paulo, 04230-000

Other trials in Brazil

Poland4 sites
  • SP ZOZ Wojewodzki Szpital Zespolony im. Jedrzeja Sniadeckiego

    Bialystok, 15-950

  • Centrum Osteoporozy i Chorob Kostno-Stawowych

    Bialystok, 16-461

  • Poznanski Osrodek Medyczny

    Poznan, 60-773

  • Centrum Badan Klinicznych

    Warsaw, 02-256

Other trials in Poland

South Korea4 sites
  • Hallym University Sacred Heart Hospital/Rheumatology, Internal Medicine

    Anyang, 431-070

  • Yonsei University College of Medicine, Severance Hospital, Rheumatology, Internal Medicine

    Seoul, 120-752

  • Hanyang University Hospital, Department of Rheumatology

    Seoul, 133-792

  • The Catholic University of Korea, Kangnam St. Mary's Hospital/ Rheumatology, Internal Medicine

    Seoul

Other trials in South Korea

Peru3 sites
  • Instituto Peruano del Hueso y la Articulación SAC.

    Lima, L-27

  • Instituto Peruano del Climaterio

    Lima, L27

  • Instituto de Ginecologia y Reproduccion

    Lima, L33

Other trials in Peru

Estonia2 sites
  • East Tallinn Central Hospital

    Tallinn, 11312

  • North Estonia Regional Hospital

    Tallinn, 13419

Other trials in Estonia

Spain2 sites
  • Hospital de Cruces

    Barakaldo, Vizcaya, 48903

  • Hospital Nuestra Señora de Valme

    Seville, 41014

Other trials in Spain

Australia1 site
  • Emeritus Research

    Malvern East, Victoria, 3145

Other trials in Australia

About this study

Official title: A 12-WEEK, PHASE 2A, RANDOMIZED, DOUBLE-BLIND, PLACEBO-CONTROLLED STUDY TO INVESTIGATE THE SAFETY, PHARMACOKINETICS, AND EFFICACY OF PH 797804, ADMINISTERED ORALLY ONCE DAILY IN SUBJECTS WITH ACTIVE RHEUMATOID ARTHRITIS

Investigating the safety and tolerability of a p38 inhibitor as monotherapy in subjects who have failed at least 1 DMARD.

Being tested
placebo, PH-797804
Keywords
Arthritis, Rheumatoid
Medical subject headings
Arthritis, Rheumatoid, Arthritis

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • placeboDrug

    Capsule, once daily (QD) for 12 weeks

  • PH-797804Drug

    Capsule, 0.5 mg of PH-797804, once daily (QD) for 12 weeks

  • PH-797804Drug

    Capsule, 3 mg of PH-797804, once daily (QD) for 12 weeks

  • PH-797804Drug

    Capsule, 6 mg of PH-797804, once daily (QD) for 12 weeks

  • PH-797804Drug

    Capsule, 10 mg of PH-797804, once daily (QD) for 12 weeks

Study groups in NCT00383188
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
1Placebo comparatorNot described
Receives: Drug: placebo
2ExperimentalNot described
Receives: Drug: PH-797804
3ExperimentalNot described
Receives: Drug: PH-797804
4ExperimentalNot described
Receives: Drug: PH-797804
5ExperimentalNot described
Receives: Drug: PH-797804

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Percentage of Participants Achieving American College of Rheumatology 20 Percent (%) (ACR 20) Response at Week 12

    ACR20 responders: participants with greater than or equal to(>=)20% improvement in tender and swollen 28-joint counts from baseline, >=20% improvement in at least 3 of 5 measures: Patient's global assessment of arthritis(PGA), physician's global assessment of arthritis, participant's assessment of pain on visual analogue scale (Pain-VAS), health assessment questionnaire-disability index (HAQ-DI), C-reactive protein (CRP) in mg/liter (mg/L). PGA:participant assess overall disease activity on VAS, score:0(no arthritis) to 100(extreme arthritis), high score=more arthritis. Physician's global assessment:physician judge participant's overall disease activity on VAS, score:0(no arthritis) to 100millimeter(mm) (extreme arthritis), high score=more arthritis. Pain-VAS:participant assess arthritis pain on 100mm VAS, score:0mm (no pain) to 100mm (extreme pain), high score=more pain. HAQ-DI:functional disability evaluation, score:0 (no difficulty) to 3 (unable to do), high score=more disability.

    Measured: Week 12

Secondary outcomes (22)
  1. Percentage of Participants Achieving American College of Rheumatology 20 Percent (%) (ACR 20) Response at Weeks 1, 2, 4, 8 and 16

    ACR20 responders: participants with greater than or equal to(>=)20% improvement in tender and swollen 28-joint counts from baseline, >=20% improvement in at least 3 of 5 measures: Patient's global assessment of arthritis(PGA), physician's global assessment of arthritis, participant's assessment of pain on visual analogue scale (Pain-VAS), health assessment questionnaire-disability index (HAQ-DI), C-reactive protein (CRP) in mg/L. PGA:participant assess overall disease activity on VAS, score:0(no arthritis) to 100(extreme arthritis), high score=more arthritis. Physician's global assessment:physician judge participant's overall disease activity on VAS, score:0(no arthritis) to 100millimeter(mm) (extreme arthritis), high score=more arthritis. Pain-VAS:participant assessed arthritis pain on 100mm VAS, score:0mm (no pain) to 100mm (extreme pain), high score=more pain. HAQ-DI:functional disability evaluation, score:0 (no difficulty) to 3 (unable to do), high score=more disability.

    Measured: Weeks 1, 2, 4, 8, 16

  2. Percentage of Participants Achieving American College of Rheumatology 50 Percent (%) (ACR 50) Response at Weeks 1, 2, 4, 8, 12 and 16

    ACR50 responders: participants with >= 50% improvement in tender and swollen 28-joint counts from baseline and >= 50% improvement in at least 3 of the 5 measures: PGA, physician global assessment, Pain-VAS, HAQ-DI and C-reactive protein (in mg/L). PGA: participant assessed overall disease activity on VAS, score: 0 (no arthritis) to 100 (extreme arthritis), higher score=more arthritis. Physician global assessment: physician judged participant's overall disease activity on VAS, score: 0 (no arthritis) to 100 mm VAS (extreme arthritis), higher score=more arthritis. Pain-VAS: participant assessed arthritis pain by 100 mm VAS, score: 0 mm (no pain) to 100 mm (extreme pain), higher score=more pain. HAQ-DI: functional disability evaluation, score: 0 (no difficulty) to 3 (unable to do), higher score=more disability.

    Measured: Weeks 1, 2, 4, 8, 12 and 16

  3. Percentage of Participants Achieving American College of Rheumatology 70 Percent (%) (ACR 70) Response at Weeks 1, 2, 4, 8, 12 and 16

    ACR70 responders: participants with >=70% improvement in tender and swollen 28-joint counts from baseline and >= 70% improvement in at least 3 of the 5 measures: PGA, physician global assessment, Pain-VAS, HAQ-DI and CRP (in mg/L). PGA: participant assessed overall disease activity on VAS, score: 0 (no arthritis) to 100 (extreme arthritis), higher score=more arthritis. Physician global assessment: physician judged participant's overall disease activity on VAS, score: 0 (no arthritis) to 100 mm VAS (extreme arthritis), higher score=more arthritis. Pain-VAS: participant assessed arthritis pain by 100 mm VAS, score: 0 mm (no pain) to 100 mm (extreme pain), higher score=more pain. HAQ-DI: functional disability evaluation, score: 0 (no difficulty) to 3 (unable to do), higher score=more disability.

    Measured: Weeks 1, 2, 4, 8, 12 and 16

  4. Change From Baseline in Tender/Painful Joint Count at Weeks 1, 2, 4, 8, 12 and 16

    A total of 28 tender/painful joints were assessed for tenderness or pain. The 28 joints included: shoulders, elbows, wrists, metacarpophalangeal (MCP) joints, proximal interphalangeal (PIP) joints, and knees. Artificial joints were not assessed.

    Measured: Baseline, Weeks 1, 2, 4, 8, 12 and 16

  5. Change From Baseline in Swollen Joint Count at Weeks 1, 2, 4, 8, 12 and 16

    A total of 28 swollen joints were assessed. The 28 joints included: shoulders, elbows, wrists, MCP joints, PIP joints, and knees. Artificial joints were not assessed.

    Measured: Baseline, Weeks 1, 2, 4, 8, 12 and 16

  6. Change From Baseline in Participant Assessment of Arthritis Pain at Weeks 1, 2, 4, 8, 12 and 16

    Participants self-assessed the severity of arthritis pain using a 100 mm VAS between 0 mm (no pain) and 100 mm (most severe pain), where higher scores indicate higher degree of pain intensity.

    Measured: Baseline, Weeks 1, 2, 4, 8, 12 and 16

  7. Change From Baseline in Participant Global Assessment (PGA) of Arthritis at Weeks 1, 2, 4, 8 12 and 16

    Participants responded to the question "Considering all the ways your arthritis affects you, how are you feeling today?" was recorded using a 0-100 mm VAS where 0 mm (very well) and 100 mm (very poor). Higher scores indicated worse condition.

    Measured: Baseline, Week 1, 2, 4, 8, 12 and 16

  8. Change From Baseline in Physician Global Assessment of Arthritis at Weeks 1, 2, 4, 8, 12 and 16

    Physician assessed the overall impact of arthritis on the participants' daily life based on the disease signs, functional capacity and physical examination. The physician's response was recorded using a 100 mm VAS between 0 mm (very good) and 100 mm (very poor). Higher scores indicating worse condition of arthritis.

    Measured: Baseline, Week 1, 2, 4, 8, 12 and 16

  9. Change From Baseline in C-Reactive Protein (CRP) at Weeks 1, 2, 4, 8, 12 and 16

    C-reactive protein is a biochemical measure of inflammation and disease activity.

    Measured: Baseline, Week 1, 2, 4, 8, 12 and 16

  10. Change From Baseline in Disease Activity Score in 28 Joints Using 4 Variables (DAS28-4 [CRP]) at Weeks 1, 2, 4, 8, 12 and 16

    DAS28-4 (CRP) was calculated from 28-tender joint count and 28-swollen joint count, C-reactive protein (mg/L) and PGA : participant assessed overall disease activity on VAS, score:0(no arthritis) to 100(extreme arthritis). DAS28-4 (CRP) lower than (<) 3.2 implied mild disease activity, 3.2 to 5.1 implied moderate disease activity and greater than (>) 5.1 severe disease activity. Total score range: 0 to 9.4, higher score indicated more disease activity.

    Measured: Baseline, Weeks 1, 2, 4, 8, 12 and 16

  11. Number of Participants Who Withdrew From Study Due to Lack of Efficacy

    Measured: Baseline up to Week 16

  12. Change From Baseline in Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (HAQ-DI) Score at Weeks 1, 2, 4, 8, 12 and 16

    HAQ-DI: participant-reported assessment of ability to perform tasks in 8 categories of daily living activities: dressing/grooming, arising, eating, walking, reaching, gripping, hygiene, and "other common activities" over past week. Each item scored on 4-point scale from 0 to 3: 0= no difficulty; 1= some difficulty; 2= much difficulty; 3= unable to do. Overall score was computed as the sum of domain scores and divided by the number of domains answered. Total average possible score range 0 (least difficulty) to 3 (extreme difficulty), where higher scores indicate more difficulty while performing daily living activities.

    Measured: Baseline, Week 1, 2, 4, 8, 12 and 16

  13. Change From Baseline in Modified Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form (mBPI-SF) Score at Weeks 1, 2, 4, 8 and 12

    The modified brief pain inventory-short form (mBPI-SF) is a pain assessment tool used to measure both pain intensity and pain interference using an 11-point numeric rating scale. Participants rated their pain severity, using a scale from 0 (no pain) to 10 (pain as bad as you can imagine), where higher scores indicate greater intensity of pain. Participants also rated the level of pain interference using a scale from 0 (no interference) to 10 (complete interference), where higher scores indicate more degree of interference in general daily activities.

    Measured: Baseline, Week 1, 2, 4, 8 and 12

  14. Change From Baseline in 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) Version 2 at Weeks 4 and 12

    The SF-36 version 2 is a 36-item generic health status measure standardized survey is a standardized survey evaluating 8 domains of functional health and well-being: physical functioning (PF), role physical (RP), bodily pain (BP), general health (GH), vitality (VT), social functioning (SF), role emotional (RE) and mental health (MH). The summary score of these concepts is summarized as Physical component summary (PCS) score and Mental component summary (MCS) score, are based on a normalized sum of the 8 scale scores PF, RP, BP, GH, VT, SF, RE, and MH. The score for each of 8 domains were scaled from 0 (lowest level of functioning) to100 (highest level of functioning, where higher scores represented better level of functioning. 8 domains were summarized as 2 summary scores; PCS and MCS. Score range for each of the 2 summary scores = 0 (lowest level of functioning) to 100 (highest level of functioning), where higher scores represented better level of functioning.

    Measured: Baseline, Weeks 4, 12

  15. Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)

    An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant who received study drug without regard to possibility of causal relationship. SAE was an AE resulting in any of the following outcomes or deemed significant for any other reason: death; initial or prolonged inpatient hospitalization; life threatening experience (immediate risk of dying); persistent or significant disability/incapacity; congenital anomaly. Treatment-emergent events are events between first dose of study drug and up to week 16 after last dose that were absent before treatment or that worsened relative to pretreatment state. AEs included both serious and non-serious AEs.

    Measured: Baseline up to Week 16

  16. Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities

    Haemoglobin, haematocrit, red blood cell count less than(<) 0.8*lower limit of normal [LLN], platelets <0.5*LLN and (\&) greater than(>) 1.75*ULN, white blood cell count <0.6*LLN\&>1.5x ULN, lymphocytes <0.8*LLN\&>1.2*ULN, total neutrophils <0.8*LLN\&>1.2*ULN, basophils, eosinophils, monocytes >1.2*ULN; total bilirubin >1.5*ULN, aspartate aminotransferase, alanine aminotransferase, gamma glutamyl transferase, alkaline phosphatase >3.0*ULN, total protein <0.8*LLN\&>1.2*ULN, albumin <0.8*LLN\&>1.2*ULN; blood urea nitrogen, Creatinine, Uric Acid >1.2*ULN; Cholesterol >1.3*ULN, HDL Cholesterol <0.8*LLN, LDL Cholesterol >1.2*ULN, Triglycerides >1.3*ULN; Electrolytes: sodium <0.95*LLN\&>1.05*ULN, potassium <0.9*LLN\&>1.1*ULN, chloride, calcium, magnesium, bicarbonate <0.9*LLN\&>1.1*ULN, phosphate <0.8*LLN\&>1.2x ULN; glucose <0.6*LLN\&>1.5*ULN, human chorionic gonadotrophin >0; CRP >1.25*ULN, ([urine-RBC, WBC, epithelial cells, crystals, yeast cells] >=6), urine casts >1, urine Bacteria >20.

    Measured: Baseline up to Week 16

  17. Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Vital Signs Abnormalities

    Pre-defined criteria for vital sign abnormalities: Maximum (max) increase from baseline in supine systolic blood pressure (SBP) >=30 milliliters of mercury (mmHg), maximum increase from baseline in supine diastolic blood pressure (DBP) >=20 mmHg.

    Measured: Baseline up to Week 16

  18. Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Changes From Baseline in 12-Lead Electrocardiogram (ECG) Parameters

    12-lead ECG were performed after the participant had rested quietly for at least 10 minutes in a supine position. ECG parameters included RR interval, PR interval, QRS complex, QT interval, corrected QT (QTc) interval, Bazett's correction QT (QTcB) interval, Heart Rate and Fridericia's correction (QTcF) interval. Clinical significance of 12-Lead ECG was judged by investigator.

    Measured: Baseline up to Week 16

  19. Number of Participants With Electrocardiogram (ECG) Abnormalities

    Criteria for ECG abnormalities: maximum QT interval (millisecond [msec]): < 450, 450 to <480, 480 to <500, >= 500; maximum QT interval with Bazett's correction (QTcB interval) (msec): <450, 450 to <480, 480 to <500, >=500; maximum QT interval with Fridericia's correction (QTcF interval) (msec): <450, 450 to <480, 480 to <500, >=500; maximum QTc interval increase from baseline (msec): change <30, 30 <=change <60, change >=60.

    Measured: Baseline up to Week 16

  20. Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Physical Examination Abnormalities

    Following criteria and body systems were examined to identify the clinically significant physical examination abnormalities; general appearance, skin (presence of rash), head, ears, eyes, nose, and throat, lungs (auscultation), heart (auscultation for presence of murmurs, gallops, rubs, peripheral edema), abdominal (palpation and auscultation), neurologic (mental status, station, gait, reflexes, motor and sensory function, coordination). Physical examination abnormalities were as determined by the investigator.

    Measured: Baseline up to Week 16

  21. Minimum Observed Plasma Pre-dose Concentration (Ctrough Min) of Steady State

    Measured: Predose

  22. Number of Participants With Concomitant Medications

    Concomitant medication (any medication other than, and in addition to, the study medication) taken for any period of time during the study and was coded by World Health Organization (WHO) medical dictionary.

    Measured: Baseline up to Week 16

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted2 Oct 2006 (estimated)
  2. Study start15 Dec 2006
  3. Primary completion1 Jul 2008
  4. Study completion16 Jul 2008

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 2
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Quadruple blind
Who is masked
Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor
Enrolment
305 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT00383188
Sponsor's protocol ID
A6631007
Other IDs
2006-003577-27, RA POC
Status last verified
Jul 2021
First submitted
28 Sep 2006
Last updated
20 Aug 2021
Data monitoring committee
No
Individual data sharing
Yes: Pfizer will provide access to individual de-identified participant data and related study documents (e.g. protocol, Statistical Analysis Plan (SAP), Clinical Study Report (CSR)) upon request from qualified researchers, and subject to certain criteria, conditions, and exceptions. Further details on Pfizer's data sharing criteria and process for requesting access can be found at: https://www.pfizer.com/science/clinical\_trials/trial\_data\_and\_results/data\_requests.

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 2 study testing PH-797804 in people with Arthritis, Rheumatoid, run by Pfizer at 48 sites in 12 countries.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 20 Aug 2021. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 48 sites in Czechia, India, South Africa, Chile, Russia and 7 more countries. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this phase mean?

Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 20 Aug 2021). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Percentage of Participants Achieving American College of Rheumatology 20 Percent (%) (ACR 20) Response at Week 12 (time frame: Week 12). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 20 Aug 2021.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in