Alzheimer's DiseasePhase 2NCT00388544
Enhancing Quality of Life for Nursing Home Residents
A Phase 2 study testing Activity matched to interest, Activity matched to function and Activity matched to both interest and function in people with Alzheimer's Disease, run by Penn State University at 1 site in United States.
Trial summary
Many persons with dementia exhibit behaviors that caregivers find difficult to manage. The purpose of this study is to test the effectiveness of individualized recreational activities for reducing agitation and passivity in persons with dementia. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 65 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Alzheimer's Disease
- What is being tested?
- Activity matched to interest, Activity matched to function and Activity matched to both interest and function
- Type of treatment
- Lifestyle or therapy programme
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 128 participants
- Where
- 1 siteUnited States
- Study dates
- May 2005to Feb 2010
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 65 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Older adult
Who may be able to join
- English speaking; diagnosis of dementia; a willing informant who knows the subject well and who can provide past personality and other data; a stable dose of any psychoactive drug from pre-baseline through final observation; and presence of agitation or passivity.
Who cannot join
- delirium or an unstable medical condition; history of Parkinson's disease, Huntington's disease, seizure disorder, stroke, alcoholism, drug abuse, head trauma with loss of consciousness, or psychiatric illness preceding the onset of memory loss; severe vision or hearing impairment; and receiving a new psychoactive medication within the past 30 days.
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
United States1 site
Nursing homes in Central and Northeast Pennsylvania
University Park, Pennsylvania, 16802
About this study
Official title: A Prescription for Enhancing Resident Quality of Life
Many persons with dementia exhibit behaviors that caregivers find difficult to manage. The purpose of this study is to test the effectiveness of individualized recreational activities for reducing agitation and passivity in persons with dementia.
Read the detailed description
Most persons with dementia exhibit behavioral symptoms, such as agitation and passivity, at some time in the course of their illness. These behaviors are a source of caregiver burden and often precipitate nursing home placement. There are a number of drugs that can be used to treat these behaviors, but they are costly and have serious adverse effects in a sizable number of people. Non-drug interventions, such as recreational activities, are recommended as the first line of treatment for behavioral symptoms. However, we don't know which activities are most effective for individual residents. The "one size fits all" approach has not been very effective. We are testing an approach that individualizes activities for residents based on their personality style of interest and functional level. We anticipate that this approach will be more effective for reducing behavioral symptoms than routine activities given to all residents. Consenting residents are assessed for personality and functional level and are videotaped during a baseline period and during activities so we can reliably measure behaviors, affect and engagement.
- Conditions
- Alzheimer's Disease
- Being tested
- Activity matched to interest, Activity matched to function, Activity matched to both interest and function
- Medical subject headings
- Alzheimer Disease
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Activity matched to interestBehavioural
Recreational activities are tailored to subject's style of interest
Activity matched to functionBehavioural
Recreational activities are tailored to subjects physical and cognitive functioning
Activity matched to both interest and functionBehavioural
Recreational activities are tailored to both style of interest and physical and cognitive functioning.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Experimental | Not described Receives: Behavioral: Activity matched to interest |
| 2 | Experimental | Not described Receives: Behavioral: Activity matched to function |
| 3 | Experimental | Not described Receives: Behavioral: Activity matched to both interest and function |
| 4 | No intervention | Recreational activities are not tailored to either style of interest or function |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Agitation
Measured: During activity intervention, random times outside of activity intervention (during the intervention period), and one week post intervention period
Passivity
Measured: During activity intervention, random times outside of activity intervention (during the intervention period), and one week post intervention period
Secondary outcomes (3)
Mood
Measured: During activity intervention, random times outside of activity intervention (during the intervention period), and one week post intervention period
Affect
Measured: During activity intervention, random times outside of activity intervention (during the intervention period), and one week post intervention period
Engagement
Measured: During activity intervention, random times outside of activity intervention (during the intervention period), and one week post intervention period
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted17 Oct 2006 (estimated)
- Study startMay 2005
- Primary completionFeb 2010
- Study completionFeb 2010
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (19)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Alzheimer's DiseaseStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Penn State UniversityThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Primary purpose
- Diagnosis
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- Double blind
- Who is masked
- Care provider, Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 128 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Penn State University
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- National Institute of Nursing Research (NINR)
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Ann Kolanowski, Penn State University
- Investigators
- Ann Kolanowski, PhD, RN, Principal investigator, Penn State University
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00388544
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 19150
- Other IDs
- R01NR008910, R01NR008910-01A1
- Status last verified
- May 2012
- First submitted
- 13 Oct 2006
- Last updated
- 9 May 2012
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
Publications
Fick DM, Kolanowski AM, Waller JL, Inouye SK. Delirium superimposed on dementia in a community-dwelling managed care population: a 3-year retrospective study of occurrence, costs, and utilization. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2005 Jun;60(6):748-53. doi: 10.1093/gerona/60.6.748.
PubMed 15983178Kolanowski AM, Litaker M, Buettner L. Efficacy of theory-based activities for behavioral symptoms of dementia. Nurs Res. 2005 Jul-Aug;54(4):219-28. doi: 10.1097/00006199-200507000-00003.
PubMed 16027564Kolanowski A, Litaker M. Social interaction, premorbid personality, and agitation in nursing home residents with dementia. Arch Psychiatr Nurs. 2006 Feb;20(1):12-20. doi: 10.1016/j.apnu.2005.08.006.
PubMed 16442470Kolanowski A, Buettner L, Litaker M, Yu F. Factors that relate to activity engagement in nursing home residents. Am J Alzheimers Dis Other Demen. 2006 Jan-Feb;21(1):15-22. doi: 10.1177/153331750602100109.
PubMed 16526585Kolanowski A, Fick D, Waller JL, Ahern F. Outcomes of antipsychotic drug use in community-dwelling elders with dementia. Arch Psychiatr Nurs. 2006 Oct;20(5):217-25. doi: 10.1016/j.apnu.2006.04.004.
PubMed 17010825Yu F, Kolanowski AM, Litaker M. The association of physical function with agitation and passivity in nursing home residents with dementia. J Gerontol Nurs. 2006 Dec;32(12):30-6. doi: 10.3928/00989134-20061201-05.
PubMed 17190404Woods CA. Working better with GPs: lessons to be learned from a study of health care networks in the management of diabetes. Clin Exp Optom. 2006 Jan;89(1):1-2. doi: 10.1111/j.1444-0938.2006.00006.x. No abstract available.
PubMed 16430433Kolanowski A, Buettner L, Moeller J. Treatment fidelity plan for an activity intervention designed for persons with dementia. Am J Alzheimers Dis Other Demen. 2006 Oct-Nov;21(5):326-32. doi: 10.1177/1533317506291074.
PubMed 17062551Penrod J, Yu F, Kolanowski A, Fick DM, Loeb SJ, Hupcey JE. Reframing person-centered nursing care for persons with dementia. Res Theory Nurs Pract. 2007;21(1):57-72. doi: 10.1891/rtnpij-v21i1a007.
PubMed 17378465Kolanowski A, Hoffman L, Hofer SM. Concordance of self-report and informant assessment of emotional well-being in nursing home residents with dementia. J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. 2007 Jan;62(1):P20-7. doi: 10.1093/geronb/62.1.p20.
PubMed 17284553Buettner, L., Kolanowski, A. & Yu, F. (2007). Recreational games: Simple and effective cognitive stimulation programs for residents with dementia in long-term settings. American Journal of Recreation Therapy, 6 (1), 25-30.
Kolanowski A, Buettner L. Prescribing activities that engage passive residents. An innovative method. J Gerontol Nurs. 2008 Jan;34(1):13-8. doi: 10.3928/00989134-20080101-08.
PubMed 18274300Whall AL, Colling KB, Kolanowski A, Kim H, Son Hong GR, DeCicco B, Ronis DL, Richards KC, Algase D, Beck C. Factors associated with aggressive behavior among nursing home residents with dementia. Gerontologist. 2008 Dec;48(6):721-31. doi: 10.1093/geront/48.6.721.
PubMed 19139246Dettmore D, Kolanowski A, Boustani M. Aggression in persons with dementia: use of nursing theory to guide clinical practice. Geriatr Nurs. 2009 Jan-Feb;30(1):8-17. doi: 10.1016/j.gerinurse.2008.03.001.
PubMed 19215808Smith, M., Kolanowski, A., Buettner, S., & Buckwalter, K. (accepted). Beyond bingo and painted nails: Meaningful activities for persons with dementia in the nursing home. Annals of Long Term Care.
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 9 May 2012. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- A Prescription for Enhancing Resident Quality of Life
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00388544
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 19150
- Conditions
- Alzheimer's Disease
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 128 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Penn State UniversityUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- National Institute of Nursing Research (NINR)
- Study start
- May 2005
- Primary completion
- Feb 2010 (actual)
- Study completion
- Feb 2010 (actual)
- First posted
- 17 Oct 2006 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Many persons with dementia exhibit behaviors that caregivers find difficult to manage. The purpose of this study is to test the effectiveness of individualized recreational activities for reducing agitation and passivity in persons with dementia.
Detailed description
Most persons with dementia exhibit behavioral symptoms, such as agitation and passivity, at some time in the course of their illness. These behaviors are a source of caregiver burden and often precipitate nursing home placement. There are a number of drugs that can be used to treat these behaviors, but they are costly and have serious adverse effects in a sizable number of people. Non-drug interventions, such as recreational activities, are recommended as the first line of treatment for behavioral symptoms. However, we don't know which activities are most effective for individual residents. The "one size fits all" approach has not been very effective. We are testing an approach that individualizes activities for residents based on their personality style of interest and functional level. We anticipate that this approach will be more effective for reducing behavioral symptoms than routine activities given to all residents. Consenting residents are assessed for personality and functional level and are videotaped during a baseline period and during activities so we can reliably measure behaviors, affect and engagement.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Diagnosis
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- Double blind (care provider, outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 4
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Experimental | Behavioral: Activity matched to interest |
| 2 | Experimental | Behavioral: Activity matched to function |
| 3 | Experimental | Behavioral: Activity matched to both interest and function |
| 4 | No intervention | –Recreational activities are not tailored to either style of interest or function |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 65 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (1 listed)
- English speaking; diagnosis of dementia; a willing informant who knows the subject well and who can provide past personality and other data; a stable dose of any psychoactive drug from pre-baseline through final observation; and presence of agitation or passivity.
Key exclusion criteria (1 listed)
- delirium or an unstable medical condition; history of Parkinson's disease, Huntington's disease, seizure disorder, stroke, alcoholism, drug abuse, head trauma with loss of consciousness, or psychiatric illness preceding the onset of memory loss; severe vision or hearing impairment; and receiving a new psychoactive medication within the past 30 days.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Activity matched to interestRecreational activities are tailored to subject's style of interest | Behavioural | 1 |
| Activity matched to functionRecreational activities are tailored to subjects physical and cognitive functioning | Behavioural | 2 |
| Activity matched to both interest and functionRecreational activities are tailored to both style of interest and physical and cognitive functioning. | Behavioural | 3 |
Primary outcome
Agitation
Time frame: During activity intervention, random times outside of activity intervention (during the intervention period), and one week post intervention period
Passivity
Time frame: During activity intervention, random times outside of activity intervention (during the intervention period), and one week post intervention period
3 secondary outcomes
Mood
Time frame: During activity intervention, random times outside of activity intervention (during the intervention period), and one week post intervention period
Affect
Time frame: During activity intervention, random times outside of activity intervention (during the intervention period), and one week post intervention period
Engagement
Time frame: During activity intervention, random times outside of activity intervention (during the intervention period), and one week post intervention period
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 9 May 2012.
- Background: PubMed 15983178Fick DM, Kolanowski AM, Waller JL, Inouye SK. Delirium superimposed on dementia in a community-dwelling managed care population: a 3-year retrospective study of occurrence, costs, and utilization. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2005 Jun;60(6):748-53. doi: 10.1093/gerona/60.6.748.
- Background: PubMed 16027564Kolanowski AM, Litaker M, Buettner L. Efficacy of theory-based activities for behavioral symptoms of dementia. Nurs Res. 2005 Jul-Aug;54(4):219-28. doi: 10.1097/00006199-200507000-00003.
- Background: PubMed 16442470Kolanowski A, Litaker M. Social interaction, premorbid personality, and agitation in nursing home residents with dementia. Arch Psychiatr Nurs. 2006 Feb;20(1):12-20. doi: 10.1016/j.apnu.2005.08.006.
- Background: PubMed 16526585Kolanowski A, Buettner L, Litaker M, Yu F. Factors that relate to activity engagement in nursing home residents. Am J Alzheimers Dis Other Demen. 2006 Jan-Feb;21(1):15-22. doi: 10.1177/153331750602100109.
- Background: PubMed 17010825Kolanowski A, Fick D, Waller JL, Ahern F. Outcomes of antipsychotic drug use in community-dwelling elders with dementia. Arch Psychiatr Nurs. 2006 Oct;20(5):217-25. doi: 10.1016/j.apnu.2006.04.004.
- Background: PubMed 17190404Yu F, Kolanowski AM, Litaker M. The association of physical function with agitation and passivity in nursing home residents with dementia. J Gerontol Nurs. 2006 Dec;32(12):30-6. doi: 10.3928/00989134-20061201-05.
- Background: PubMed 16430433Woods CA. Working better with GPs: lessons to be learned from a study of health care networks in the management of diabetes. Clin Exp Optom. 2006 Jan;89(1):1-2. doi: 10.1111/j.1444-0938.2006.00006.x. No abstract available.
- Background: PubMed 17062551Kolanowski A, Buettner L, Moeller J. Treatment fidelity plan for an activity intervention designed for persons with dementia. Am J Alzheimers Dis Other Demen. 2006 Oct-Nov;21(5):326-32. doi: 10.1177/1533317506291074.
- Background: PubMed 17378465Penrod J, Yu F, Kolanowski A, Fick DM, Loeb SJ, Hupcey JE. Reframing person-centered nursing care for persons with dementia. Res Theory Nurs Pract. 2007;21(1):57-72. doi: 10.1891/rtnpij-v21i1a007.
- Background: PubMed 17284553Kolanowski A, Hoffman L, Hofer SM. Concordance of self-report and informant assessment of emotional well-being in nursing home residents with dementia. J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. 2007 Jan;62(1):P20-7. doi: 10.1093/geronb/62.1.p20.
- BackgroundBuettner, L., Kolanowski, A. & Yu, F. (2007). Recreational games: Simple and effective cognitive stimulation programs for residents with dementia in long-term settings. American Journal of Recreation Therapy, 6 (1), 25-30.
- Background: PubMed 18274300Kolanowski A, Buettner L. Prescribing activities that engage passive residents. An innovative method. J Gerontol Nurs. 2008 Jan;34(1):13-8. doi: 10.3928/00989134-20080101-08.
Related trials for Alzheimer's Disease
RecruitingPhase 2
Neuroplasticity Enhancement From Cognitive Training Reinforced by Psilocybin
Alzheimer's Disease
Not yet recruiting
Acupressure as Long-term Intervention to Slow the Progression of Early/Mild Alzheimer's Disease
Alzheimer's Disease
RecruitingObservational study
Effectiveness and Safety of Disease-Modifying Therapy for Alzheimer's Disease: A Multicenter Retrospective Study
Alzheimer's Disease (AD)
RecruitingPhase 3
A Phase 3 Study to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of KarXT + KarX-EC for the Treatment of Agitation Associated With Alzheimer's Disease (ADAGIO-1)
Alzheimer Disease
RecruitingPhase 3
A Study of Trontinemab in Cognitively Unimpaired Individuals at Risk for Progression to Symptomatic Alzheimer's Disease
Alzheimer's Disease
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Ann Kolanowski, PhD, RN principal investigator
Penn State University
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 2 study testing Activity matched to interest, Activity matched to function and Activity matched to both interest and function in people with Alzheimer's Disease, run by Penn State University at 1 site in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 9 May 2012. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Agitation (time frame: During activity intervention, random times outside of activity intervention (during the intervention period), and one week post intervention period). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT00388544, which also lists 19 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 9 May 2012.