ColonoscopyPhase 3NCT00389233
A Phase III Trial to Assess the Efficacy, Acceptability and Safety of Moviprep® Versus a 4L PEG+E Standard Solution
A Phase 3 study testing Macrogol3350 NA sulphate NACl KCl ascorbic acid NA ascorbate and Macrogol3350 Na sulphate Na bicarbonate NaCl KCl in people with Colonoscopy, run by Norgine at 12 sites in Germany.
Trial summary
The study was carried out as a randomised, single-blind, active-controlled, multi-centric, phase III study with two parallel treatment groups. The primary efficacy criterion was the frequency of effective gut cleansing in each of the two treatment groups (grade A or B "overall quality of gut cleansing" as judged by a… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 85 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Colonoscopy
- What is being tested?
- Macrogol3350 NA sulphate NACl KCl ascorbic acid NA ascorbate and Macrogol3350 Na sulphate Na bicarbonate NaCl KCl
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 360 participants
- Where
- 12 sitesGermany
- Study dates
- Jun 2002to Dec 2002
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 85 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- written informed consent prior to inclusion;
- male or female in-patients, aged 18 to 85 years, with indication for complete colonoscopy;
- willing and able to complete the entire procedure and to comply with study instructions;
- females of childbearing potential employing an adequate method of contraception.
Who cannot join
- ileus;
- intestinal obstruction or perforation;
- toxic megacolon;
- congestive heart failure (NYHA class III and IV);
- acute life-threatening cardiovascular disease;
- untreated or uncontrolled arterial hypertension (SBP max>170mmHg, DBP min>100mmHg);
Show all 9Show fewer
- severe renal failure;
- severe liver failure;
- known glucose-6-phosphatase dehydrogenase deficiency;
Trial locations and contacts
12 sites in 1 country.
12 sites in 1 country
Germany12 sites
Chefarzt der Abt. Gastroenterologie, Klinikum St. Marien
Amberg, 92224
Chefarzt Innere Medizin, Klinikum Aschaffenburg
Aschaffenburg, 63739
Klinikum Dachau, Innere Medizin - Gastroenterologie
Dachau
Chefarzt, Katholisches Krankenhaus St. Johann Nepomuk
Erfurt, 99097
Waldkrankenhaus St. Marien,
Erlangen, 91054
Zentrum für Innere Medizin,
Essen, 45239
Bürgerhospital Frankfurt e.V., Abteilung für interventionelle Endoskopie
Frankfurt am Main, 60318
Städtische Kliniken Frankfurt-Höchst
Frankfurt am Main, 65929
Klinikum Fürth, Med. Klinik II
Fürth, 90766
Abteilung für Innere Medizin, Israelitisches Krankenhaus
Hamburg, 22297
Kreiskrankenhaus
Tirschenreuth, D-95643
Dr.-Horst-Schmidt-Kliniken GmbH, Innere Medizin II
Wiesbaden, 65199
About this study
Official title: A Randomised, Multi-Centre, Single-Blinded, Pivotal Phase III Trial to Assess the Efficacy, Acceptability and Safety of a New 2 Litre Gut Cleansing Solution NRL994 Versus a Standard Colon Preparation With 4L PEG+E.
The study was carried out as a randomised, single-blind, active-controlled, multi-centric, phase III study with two parallel treatment groups. The primary efficacy criterion was the frequency of effective gut cleansing in each of the two treatment groups (grade A or B "overall quality of gut cleansing" as judged by a blinded expert panel on the basis of videotapes recorded during the endoscopic procedure).
Read the detailed description
The study was designed as a randomised, active-controlled, single-blind, multi-centre, pivotal phase III trial with two parallel treatment groups. 15 German hospitals with specialised gastroenterology units were expected to participate in the investigation.
Up to 360 hospital in-patients routinely scheduled to undergo complete colonoscopy were to be enrolled one to two days prior to the endoscopic procedure, and to be randomly allocated to one of the two treatment arms in a ratio of 1:1. Bowel preparation was performed using equal split doses of either low-volume NRL994 (two doses of 1,000 mL each) or high-volume PEG+E (two doses of 2,000 mL each). The first dose was to be taken in the evening before the procedure, the second dose on the morning of the day of the colonoscopy. The patients allocated to NRL994 were asked to drink at least 1L of additional clear liquid in addition to the study drug. During colonoscopy the cleansing of each of the five pre-defined gut segments was to be assessed by the physician performing the examination, using a 5-level verbal rating scale. Videotapes were to be recorded of all procedures in order to allow central review by a blinded and independent expert panel whose ratings were the primary basis for the analysis of efficacy. The patients enrolled in the study were asked to fill in a questionnaire concerning the acceptability of the preparation. A patient's participation in the study was terminated upon completion of the intervention by performing a final examination and filling in the study termination page. No interim analysis was to be performed.
- Conditions
- Colonoscopy
- Being tested
- Macrogol3350 NA sulphate NACl KCl ascorbic acid NA ascorbate, Macrogol3350 Na sulphate Na bicarbonate NaCl KCl
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Macrogol3350 NA sulphate NACl KCl ascorbic acid NA ascorbateDrug
Also called MOVIPREP®
1 pack will consist of 2L NRL 994 - 4 (2 x PEG + E/"P" + 2 x Vitamin C/"C") sachets for the 2L of 2 sachets (1 x "P" plus 1 x "C") will be dissolved in 1L of water. Each litre will be drunk within 1 hour followed by at least 500ml of any additional clear fluid.
Macrogol3350 Na sulphate Na bicarbonate NaCl KClDrug
Also called KLEAN-PREP®
1 pack will consist of 4L PEG + E - contains 4 sachets for the 4L of PEG + E/"P/E". Each sachet will be dissolved in 1L of water. Each litre will be drunk within 1 hour.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Experimental | 2L gut cleansing solution Receives: Drug: Macrogol3350 NA sulphate NACl KCl ascorbic acid NA ascorbate |
| 2 | Active comparator | 4L preparation Receives: Drug: Macrogol3350 Na sulphate Na bicarbonate NaCl KCl |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
The frequency of effective gut cleansing in each of the two treatment groups (grade A or B "overall quality of gut cleansing" as judged by a blinded expert panel on the basis of videotapes recorded during the endoscopic procedure).
Secondary outcomes (9)
Degree of gut cleansing in each of the five colonic segments
mean degree of gut cleansing
global quality of gut cleansing
overall ease to perform colonoscopy
degree of patient satisfaction
overall acceptability of the gut cleansing regimen
global taste evaluation of the solution,problems drinking the entire volume of gut cleansing solution
acceptability of the diet associated with the intake of the solution
adverse events
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted18 Oct 2006 (estimated)
- Study startJun 2002
- Study completionDec 2002
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (3)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for ColonoscopyStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind
- Who is masked
- Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 360 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Norgine
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Investigators
- Christian Ell, Prof Dr med, Principal investigator, Dept. of Internal Medicine II, Dr.-Horst-Schmidt Hospital, Teaching Hospital of the University Mainz
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00389233
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- NRL994-01/2001
- Status last verified
- Apr 2008
- First submitted
- 17 Oct 2006
- Last updated
- 16 Apr 2008
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
Publications
Ell C, Fischbach W, Bronisch JH, et al. Ergebnisse einer randomisierten, multizentrischen verblindeten Vergleichsstudie zur Wirksamkeit, Akzeptanz und Sicherheit einer neuen 2 Liter Darmvorbereitungslosung (Moviprep) im Vergleich zu einer etablierten 4 Liter Golytely Losung.[Results of a randomised, multi-centre, single-blinded trial to compare the efficacy, acceptability and safety of a new 2-litre gut cleansing solution versus a standard 4-litre PEG+E solution.] Z Gastroenterol 2004;42:P169
Ell C, Gruss HJ.Results of a Randomised, Multi-Centre, Single-Blind Trial to Compare the Efficacy, Acceptability and Safety of a New 2-Litre Gut Cleansing Solution Versus a Standard 4-Litre PEG+E Solution.Gastrointest Endosc 2004;59(5):AB125
Ell C, Fischbach W, Bronisch HJ, Dertinger S, Layer P, Runzi M, Schneider T, Kachel G, Gruger J, Kollinger M, Nagell W, Goerg KJ, Wanitschke R, Gruss HJ. Randomized trial of low-volume PEG solution versus standard PEG + electrolytes for bowel cleansing before colonoscopy. Am J Gastroenterol. 2008 Apr;103(4):883-93. doi: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2007.01708.x. Epub 2008 Jan 11.
PubMed 18190651
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 16 Apr 2008. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- A Randomised, Multi-Centre, Single-Blinded, Pivotal Phase III Trial to Assess the Efficacy, Acceptability and Safety of a New 2 Litre Gut Cleansing Solution NRL994 Versus a Standard Colon Preparation With 4L PEG+E.
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00389233
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- NRL994-01/2001
- Conditions
- Colonoscopy
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 360 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- NorgineIndustry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Study start
- Jun 2002
- Study completion
- Dec 2002
- First posted
- 18 Oct 2006 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The study was carried out as a randomised, single-blind, active-controlled, multi-centric, phase III study with two parallel treatment groups. The primary efficacy criterion was the frequency of effective gut cleansing in each of the two treatment groups (grade A or B "overall quality of gut cleansing" as judged by a blinded expert panel on the basis of videotapes recorded during the endoscopic procedure).
Detailed description
The study was designed as a randomised, active-controlled, single-blind, multi-centre, pivotal phase III trial with two parallel treatment groups. 15 German hospitals with specialised gastroenterology units were expected to participate in the investigation.
Up to 360 hospital in-patients routinely scheduled to undergo complete colonoscopy were to be enrolled one to two days prior to the endoscopic procedure, and to be randomly allocated to one of the two treatment arms in a ratio of 1:1. Bowel preparation was performed using equal split doses of either low-volume NRL994 (two doses of 1,000 mL each) or high-volume PEG+E (two doses of 2,000 mL each). The first dose was to be taken in the evening before the procedure, the second dose on the morning of the day of the colonoscopy. The patients allocated to NRL994 were asked to drink at least 1L of additional clear liquid in addition to the study drug. During colonoscopy the cleansing of each of the five pre-defined gut segments was to be assessed by the physician performing the examination, using a 5-level verbal rating scale. Videotapes were to be recorded of all procedures in order to allow central review by a blinded and independent expert panel whose ratings were the primary basis for the analysis of efficacy. The patients enrolled in the study were asked to fill in a questionnaire concerning the acceptability of the preparation. A patient's participation in the study was terminated upon completion of the intervention by performing a final examination and filling in the study termination page. No interim analysis was to be performed.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind (outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Experimental | Drug: Macrogol3350 NA sulphate NACl KCl ascorbic acid NA ascorbate2L gut cleansing solution |
| 2 | Active comparator | Drug: Macrogol3350 Na sulphate Na bicarbonate NaCl KCl4L preparation |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 85 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (4 listed)
- written informed consent prior to inclusion;
- male or female in-patients, aged 18 to 85 years, with indication for complete colonoscopy;
- willing and able to complete the entire procedure and to comply with study instructions;
- females of childbearing potential employing an adequate method of contraception.
Key exclusion criteria (9 listed)
- ileus;
- intestinal obstruction or perforation;
- toxic megacolon;
- congestive heart failure (NYHA class III and IV);
- acute life-threatening cardiovascular disease;
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Macrogol3350 NA sulphate NACl KCl ascorbic acid NA ascorbateAlso: MOVIPREP®1 pack will consist of 2L NRL 994 - 4 (2 x PEG + E/"P" + 2 x Vitamin C/"C") sachets for the 2L of 2 sachets (1 x "P" plus 1 x "C") will be dissolved in 1L of water. Each litre will be drunk within 1 hour followed by at least 500ml of any additional clear fluid. | Drug | 1 |
| Macrogol3350 Na sulphate Na bicarbonate NaCl KClAlso: KLEAN-PREP®1 pack will consist of 4L PEG + E - contains 4 sachets for the 4L of PEG + E/"P/E". Each sachet will be dissolved in 1L of water. Each litre will be drunk within 1 hour. | Drug | 2 |
Primary outcome
The frequency of effective gut cleansing in each of the two treatment groups (grade A or B "overall quality of gut cleansing" as judged by a blinded expert panel on the basis of videotapes recorded during the endoscopic procedure).
9 secondary outcomes
Degree of gut cleansing in each of the five colonic segments
mean degree of gut cleansing
global quality of gut cleansing
overall ease to perform colonoscopy
degree of patient satisfaction
overall acceptability of the gut cleansing regimen
global taste evaluation of the solution,problems drinking the entire volume of gut cleansing solution
acceptability of the diet associated with the intake of the solution
adverse events
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 16 Apr 2008.
- Results publicationEll C, Fischbach W, Bronisch JH, et al. Ergebnisse einer randomisierten, multizentrischen verblindeten Vergleichsstudie zur Wirksamkeit, Akzeptanz und Sicherheit einer neuen 2 Liter Darmvorbereitungslosung (Moviprep) im Vergleich zu einer etablierten 4 Liter Golytely Losung.[Results of a randomised, multi-centre, single-blinded trial to compare the efficacy, acceptability and safety of a new 2-litre gut cleansing solution versus a standard 4-litre PEG+E solution.] Z Gastroenterol 2004;42:P169
- Results publicationEll C, Gruss HJ.Results of a Randomised, Multi-Centre, Single-Blind Trial to Compare the Efficacy, Acceptability and Safety of a New 2-Litre Gut Cleansing Solution Versus a Standard 4-Litre PEG+E Solution.Gastrointest Endosc 2004;59(5):AB125
- Derived from this study: PubMed 18190651Ell C, Fischbach W, Bronisch HJ, Dertinger S, Layer P, Runzi M, Schneider T, Kachel G, Gruger J, Kollinger M, Nagell W, Goerg KJ, Wanitschke R, Gruss HJ. Randomized trial of low-volume PEG solution versus standard PEG + electrolytes for bowel cleansing before colonoscopy. Am J Gastroenterol. 2008 Apr;103(4):883-93. doi: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2007.01708.x. Epub 2008 Jan 11.
Related trials for Colonoscopy
Not yet recruiting
Effect of Box Breathing Exercise on Anxiety, Pain, and Pulmonary Function Tests in Patients Undergoing Colonoscopy
Colonoscopy
RecruitingObservational study
Characterization of Colorectal Dysplasic Lesions and Stratification of Their Evolving Risk in Inflammatory Bowel Disease Patients: a Prospective, Observational and Multicenter Study
Crohn Disease (CD), Colitis Ulcerative
Not yet recruiting
HFNC vs Conventional Oxygen During Gastrocolonoscopy in Elderly Patients
Hypoxemia, Eldery People
Recruiting
Five or Ten Year Colonoscopy for 1-2 Non-Advanced Adenomatous Polyps
Adenocarcinoma of the Colon, Adenocarcinoma of the Rectum
Recruiting
Visual Aids for Colonoscopy Preparation: A Prospective Study on Patient Understanding and Bowel Cleanliness in Colonoscopy Patients
The Effect of Audio-visual Aids on Bowel Cleanliness, Audiovisual Aids
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Christian Ell, Prof Dr med principal investigator
Dept. of Internal Medicine II, Dr.-Horst-Schmidt Hospital, Teaching Hospital of the University Mainz
12 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 3 study testing Macrogol3350 NA sulphate NACl KCl ascorbic acid NA ascorbate and Macrogol3350 Na sulphate Na bicarbonate NaCl KCl in people with Colonoscopy, run by Norgine at 12 sites in Germany.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 9 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 16 Apr 2008. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 12 sites in Germany. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
The frequency of effective gut cleansing in each of the two treatment groups (grade A or B "overall quality of gut cleansing" as judged by a blinded expert panel on the basis of videotapes recorded during the endoscopic procedure).. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT00389233, which also lists 3 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 16 Apr 2008.