Alcohol-Related DisordersNCT00391742
Stepped Interventions for Problem Drinkers
A study testing Brief intervention in people with Alcohol-Related Disorders and Alcohol Drinking, run by University of Luebeck.
Trial summary
In a randomized controlled trial, patients recruited in general practices and fulfilling criteria for alcohol dependence, alcohol abuse, at-risk drinking or binge drinking will be allocated to three conditions: (1) Stepped Care intervention (SC): up to 4 interventions depending on the success of the previous… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 64 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Alcohol-Related Disorders, Alcohol Drinking
- What is being tested?
- Brief intervention
- Type of treatment
- Lifestyle or therapy programme
- How many people
- 450 participants
- Where
- No sites listed yet
- Study dates
- Oct 2001to Jun 2004
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 64 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult
Who may be able to join
- Alcohol dependence
- Alcohol abuse
- At-risk drinking
- Binge drinking
Who cannot join
- Current treatment for alcohol problems
About this study
Official title: A Stepped-Care Approach for General Practice Patients With Alcohol Use Disorders
In a randomized controlled trial, patients recruited in general practices and fulfilling criteria for alcohol dependence, alcohol abuse, at-risk drinking or binge drinking will be allocated to three conditions: (1) Stepped Care intervention (SC): up to 4 interventions depending on the success of the previous intervention (assessed by alcohol consumption and self-efficacy) which start with a minimal intervention (written feedback and manuals) and are followed by more intensive interventions (counseling) in case of no success, (2) Fixed Care intervention (FC): A fixed number of counseling sessions plus written feedback and manuals, and (3) a control group (CG) booklet on health behavior. Outcome assessment will be conducted in all three groups after 12 months. The hypothesis is that SC and FC do not differ in effectiveness but SC is more economic.
Read the detailed description
Background: A promising approach in secondary prevention of problem drinking is providing brief interventions in medical settings. In Germany, 80.0 % of alcohol dependent individuals have at least one contact per year to a general practitioner, and prevalence rates in general practices are high. Randomized controlled trials have shown that general practitioner interventions significantly reduce alcohol consumption. However, a current meta-analysis revealed that very brief interventions (5 - 20 minutes) showed no significant effect and extended brief interventions (several visits) showed homogeneous effectiveness only among women. On the other hand, resources are scarce and insufficient time is one main reason for general practitioners not to intervene. A stepped-care approach (starting with a very brief intervention and intensifying efforts in case of no success) could save resources and enlarge effectiveness; however research is lacking. Objectives: Comparing conventional brief interventions for patients with at-risk drinking, alcohol abuse or alcohol dependence in general practice with a stepped-care approach in a randomized controlled trial. Methods: About 7,500 screenings among consecutive general practice patients aged 18 to 64 will be conducted. Subjects fulfilling inclusion criteria (severe alcohol dependence excluded) will be randomly assigned to one of three conditions with 150 patients each: (1) Stepped Care intervention (SC): up to 4 interventions depending on the success of the previous intervention (assessed by alcohol consumption and self-efficacy) which start with a minimal intervention (written feedback and manuals) and are followed by more intensive interventions (counseling) in case of no success, (2) Fixed Care intervention (FC): A fixed number of counseling sessions plus written feedback and manuals, and (3) a control group (CG) booklet on health behavior. Outcome assessment will be conducted in all three groups after 12 months. Counseling will be based on Motivational Interviewing and provided by research staff. Outcome variables are alcohol consumption, amount of time and costs required for successful intervention. Expected impact: Findings are expected to provide evidence for a stepped-care approach to be used in primary care. This would be the first international result confirming such an approach in the alcohol field. If a stepped-care approach would work this could significantly save resources and enhance secondary prevention. Therefore, data is of great public health interest. Relationship to the objective of the collaboration: As in the other studies, empirical data on new proactive approaches to reach underserved populations in the addiction field will be provided. The project will add knowledge on the economical use of interventions
- Conditions
- Alcohol-Related Disorders, Alcohol Drinking
- Being tested
- Brief intervention
- Keywords
- Brief intervention, Motivational Interviewing, Primary care, Stepped-care
- Medical subject headings
- Alcohol-Related Disorders, Alcohol Drinking
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Brief interventionBehavioural
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Reduced alcohol consumption
Secondary outcomes (1)
Readiness to change drinking behavior
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted24 Oct 2006 (estimated)
- Study startOct 2001
- Study completionJun 2004
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (1)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Alcohol-Related DisordersStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Factorial
- Masking
- Single blind
- Enrolment
- 450 participants
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- University of Luebeck
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- German Federal Ministry of Education and Research
- Investigators
- Hans-Jürgen Rumpf, Ph D, Principal investigator, University of Lübeck
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00391742
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- SIP
- Status last verified
- Oct 2006
- First submitted
- 23 Oct 2006
- Last updated
- 24 Oct 2006
- Results posted
- No
Publications
Bischof G, Freyer-Adam J, Meyer C, John U, Rumpf HJ. Changes in drinking behavior among control group participants in early intervention studies targeting unhealthy alcohol use recruited in general hospitals and general practices. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2012 Sep 1;125(1-2):81-8. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2012.03.018. Epub 2012 Apr 18.
PubMed 22516146
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 24 Oct 2006. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- A Stepped-Care Approach for General Practice Patients With Alcohol Use Disorders
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00391742
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- SIP
- Conditions
- Alcohol-Related Disorders, Alcohol Drinking
- Keywords
- Brief intervention, Motivational Interviewing, Primary care, Stepped-care
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 450 participants
- Lead sponsor
- University of LuebeckUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- German Federal Ministry of Education and Research
- Study start
- Oct 2001
- Study completion
- Jun 2004
- First posted
- 24 Oct 2006 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
In a randomized controlled trial, patients recruited in general practices and fulfilling criteria for alcohol dependence, alcohol abuse, at-risk drinking or binge drinking will be allocated to three conditions: (1) Stepped Care intervention (SC): up to 4 interventions depending on the success of the previous intervention (assessed by alcohol consumption and self-efficacy) which start with a minimal intervention (written feedback and manuals) and are followed by more intensive interventions (counseling) in case of no success, (2) Fixed Care intervention (FC): A fixed number of counseling sessions plus written feedback and manuals, and (3) a control group (CG) booklet on health behavior. Outcome assessment will be conducted in all three groups after 12 months. The hypothesis is that SC and FC do not differ in effectiveness but SC is more economic.
Detailed description
Background: A promising approach in secondary prevention of problem drinking is providing brief interventions in medical settings. In Germany, 80.0 % of alcohol dependent individuals have at least one contact per year to a general practitioner, and prevalence rates in general practices are high. Randomized controlled trials have shown that general practitioner interventions significantly reduce alcohol consumption. However, a current meta-analysis revealed that very brief interventions (5 - 20 minutes) showed no significant effect and extended brief interventions (several visits) showed homogeneous effectiveness only among women. On the other hand, resources are scarce and insufficient time is one main reason for general practitioners not to intervene. A stepped-care approach (starting with a very brief intervention and intensifying efforts in case of no success) could save resources and enlarge effectiveness; however research is lacking. Objectives: Comparing conventional brief interventions for patients with at-risk drinking, alcohol abuse or alcohol dependence in general practice with a stepped-care approach in a randomized controlled trial. Methods: About 7,500 screenings among consecutive general practice patients aged 18 to 64 will be conducted. Subjects fulfilling inclusion criteria (severe alcohol dependence excluded) will be randomly assigned to one of three conditions with 150 patients each: (1) Stepped Care intervention (SC): up to 4 interventions depending on the success of the previous intervention (assessed by alcohol consumption and self-efficacy) which start with a minimal intervention (written feedback and manuals) and are followed by more intensive interventions (counseling) in case of no success, (2) Fixed Care intervention (FC): A fixed number of counseling sessions plus written feedback and manuals, and (3) a control group (CG) booklet on health behavior. Outcome assessment will be conducted in all three groups after 12 months. Counseling will be based on Motivational Interviewing and provided by research staff. Outcome variables are alcohol consumption, amount of time and costs required for successful intervention. Expected impact: Findings are expected to provide evidence for a stepped-care approach to be used in primary care. This would be the first international result confirming such an approach in the alcohol field. If a stepped-care approach would work this could significantly save resources and enhance secondary prevention. Therefore, data is of great public health interest. Relationship to the objective of the collaboration: As in the other studies, empirical data on new proactive approaches to reach underserved populations in the addiction field will be provided. The project will add knowledge on the economical use of interventions
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Factorial
- Masking
- Single blind
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 64 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult
Key inclusion criteria (4 listed)
- Alcohol dependence
- Alcohol abuse
- At-risk drinking
- Binge drinking
Key exclusion criteria (1 listed)
- Current treatment for alcohol problems
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Brief intervention | Behavioural | – |
Primary outcome
Reduced alcohol consumption
1 secondary outcome
Readiness to change drinking behavior
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 24 Oct 2006.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 22516146Bischof G, Freyer-Adam J, Meyer C, John U, Rumpf HJ. Changes in drinking behavior among control group participants in early intervention studies targeting unhealthy alcohol use recruited in general hospitals and general practices. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2012 Sep 1;125(1-2):81-8. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2012.03.018. Epub 2012 Apr 18.
Related trials for Alcohol-Related Disorders
RecruitingPhase 1
PET Imaging of Phosphodiesterase-4B (PDE4B) in Alcohol Use Disorder
Alcohol Use Disorder
Recruiting
Safety and Effectiveness of the BrainsWay Deep Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (Deep TMS) for Treatment and Reduction of Heavy Drinking in Individuals With of Alcohol Use Disorder (AUD)
Alcohol Use Disorder, Alcoholism
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Inflammatory and Neuroimmune Guided Investigation of Underlying Fatigue in Patients With Cirrhosis
Cirrhosis Alcoholic, Fatigue Symptom
RecruitingPhase 1
Environment and Alcohol: A Pilot Study
Alcohol Use Disorder
Recruiting
Multisensory Processing of Alcohol Cues in Young Adult Binge Drinkers
Drinking, Binge
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Hans-Jürgen Rumpf, Ph D principal investigator
University of Lübeck
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Brief intervention in people with Alcohol-Related Disorders and Alcohol Drinking, run by University of Luebeck.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 24 Oct 2006. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Reduced alcohol consumption. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT00391742, which also lists 1 linked publication.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 24 Oct 2006.