Prostate CancerNCT00392535
Intensity-Modulated Radiation Therapy in Treating Patients With Localized Prostate Cancer
A study testing conventional radiotherapy 74 Gy delivered in 37 fractions, hypofractionated radiation therapy 60 Gy in 20 fractions and hypofractionated radiation therapy 57 Gy in 19 fractions in people with Prostate Cancer, run by Institute of Cancer Research, United Kingdom at 26 sites in United Kingdom.
Trial summary
RATIONALE: Specialized radiation therapy that delivers a high dose of radiation directly to the tumor may kill more tumor cells and cause less damage to normal tissue. It is not yet known which schedule of intensity-modulated radiation therapy is more effective in treating patients with prostate cancer. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 120 years, men only
- Conditions the study is for
- Prostate Cancer
- What is being tested?
- conventional radiotherapy 74 Gy delivered in 37 fractions, hypofractionated radiation therapy 60 Gy in 20 fractions and hypofractionated radiation therapy 57 Gy in 19 fractions
- Type of treatment
- Surgery or procedure
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 3,216 participants
- Where
- 26 sitesUnited Kingdom
- Study dates
- 18 Oct 2002to 17 Jun 2021
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 120 years
- Men only
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
DISEASE CHARACTERISTICS:
- Histologically confirmed adenocarcinoma of the prostate, meeting the following criteria:
- Clinical stage T1b-T3a, N0, M0
- Locally confined disease
- Previously untreated disease
- Prostate-specific antigen (PSA) ≤ 30 ng/mL
- Estimated risk of seminal vesicle involvement < 30%
- Estimated risk of seminal vesicle involvement is defined as PSA + ([Gleason score - 6] x 10) (i.e., if Gleason score ≤ 6, then PSA must be ≤ 30 ng/mL; if Gleason score = 7, then PSA must be < 20 ng/mL; if Gleason score = 8, then PSA must be < 10 ng/mL; if Gleason score = 9 or 10 patient is ineligible)
PATIENT CHARACTERISTICS:
- WHO performance status 0 or 1
- Life expectancy > 10 years (5 years for patients with poorly differentiated cancers)
- WBC > 4,000/mm^3
- Hemoglobin > 11g/dL
- Platelet count > 100,000/mm^3
- No other active malignancy within the past 5 years except basal cell carcinoma
- No hip prosthesis or fixation that would interfere with standard radiation beam configuration
- No comorbid conditions likely to impact on the advisability of radical radiotherapy (e.g., previous inflammatory bowel disease, previous colorectal surgery, significant bladder instability, or urinary incontinence)
PRIOR CONCURRENT THERAPY:
- No prior pelvic radiotherapy
- No prior radical prostatectomy
- No prior androgen-deprivation therapy
- No concurrent full anticoagulation therapy with warfarin or heparin
Trial locations and contacts
26 sites in 1 country.
26 sites in 1 country
United Kingdom26 sites
Basingstoke and North Hampshire NHS Foundation Trust
Basingstoke, England, RG24 9NA
Belfast City Hospital Trust
Belfast, Northern Ireland, BT8 8JR
Sussex Cancer Centre at Royal Sussex County Hospital
Brighton, England, BN2 5BF
Bristol Haematology and Oncology Centre
Bristol, England, BS2 8ED
West Suffolk Hospital
Bury St Edmunds, England, IP33 2QZ
Addenbrooke's Hospital
Cambridge, England, CB2 2QQ
Velindre Cancer Center at Velindre Hospital
Cardiff, Wales, CF14 2TL
Countess of Chester Hospital
Chester, England, CH2 1UL
Walsgrave Hospital
Coventry, England, CV2 2DX
Eastbourne District General Hospital
Eastbourne, England, BN21 2UD
Beatson West of Scotland Cancer Centre
Glasgow, Scotland, G12 0YN
St. Luke's Cancer Centre at Royal Surrey County Hospital
Guildford, England, GU2 7XX
Ipswich Hospital
Ipswich, England, IP4 5PD
Clatterbridge Centre for Oncology
Liverpool, England, CH63 4JY
Saint Bartholomew's Hospital
London, England, EC1A 7BE
Royal Marsden - London
London, England, SW3 6JJ
Christie Hospital
Manchester, England, M20 4BX
Norfolk and Norwich University Hospital
Norwich, England, NR4 7UY
Whiston Hospital
Prescot, England, L35 5DR
Rosemere Cancer Centre at Royal Preston Hospital
Preston, England, PR2 9HT
Halton Hospital
Runcorn, England, WA7 2DA
Cancer Research Centre at Weston Park Hospital
Sheffield, England, S10 2SJ
Southport and Formby District General Hospital
Southport, England, PR8 6PN
Royal Marsden - Surrey
Sutton, England, SM2 5PT
Warrington Hospital NHS Trust
Warrington, England, WA5 1QG
Worthing Hospital
Worthing, England, BN11 2DH
About this study
Official title: Conventional or Hypofractionated High Dose Intensity Modulated Radiotherapy for Prostate Cancer: CHHIP
RATIONALE: Specialized radiation therapy that delivers a high dose of radiation directly to the tumor may kill more tumor cells and cause less damage to normal tissue. It is not yet known which schedule of intensity-modulated radiation therapy is more effective in treating patients with prostate cancer.
PURPOSE: This randomized phase III trial is studying the side effects of three schedules of intensity-modulated radiation therapy and compares how well they work in treating patients with localized prostate cancer.
Read the detailed description
OBJECTIVES:
- Determine the safety and efficacy of conventional vs hypofractionated high-dose intensity-modulated radiotherapy in patients with localized prostate cancer.
- Determine the side effects of these regimens in these patients.
- Determine whether hypofractionated radiotherapy schedules will improve the therapeutic ratio by either improving tumor control or reducing normal tissue side effects.
- Compare acute and late treatment-related gastrointestinal and urological toxicity in these patients.
- Determine different prostate-specific antigen-related endpoints for local failure and distant metastases.
- Extend the database of patients treated to escalated doses with dose-volume histograms (DVHs) of normal tissues at risk and relate these to common toxicity endpoints.
- Develop a model to estimate normal tissue complication probability (NTCP) of rectum and bladder for hypofractionated as well as conventional dose-escalated radiotherapy schedules.
OUTLINE: This is a multicenter, randomized, pilot study. Patients are stratified according to risk of seminal vesicle involvement (low-risk vs moderate-risk or high-risk).
- Hormone therapy: Patients receive androgen-deprivation therapy comprising an injection of luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone (LHRH) agonist once monthly for 3-6 months and oral cyproterone acetate beginning the week before the first LHRH agonist injection and continuing for at least 2 weeks after each LHRH agonist injection. Within one week after the last LHRH agonist injection, patients proceed to radiotherapy.
- Radiotherapy: Patients are randomized to 1 of 3 treatment arms.
- Arm I: Patients undergo conventional high-dose intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) in 37 fractions over 7.5 weeks.
- Arm II: Patients undergo hypofractionated high-dose IMRT in 20 fractions over 4 weeks.
- Arm III: Patients undergo hypofractionated high-dose IMRT in 19 fractions over 3.8 weeks.
In all arms, treatment continues in the absence of unacceptable toxicity.
Quality of life is assessed periodically during study treatment.
After completion of study treatment, patients are followed periodically for up to 15 years.
Peer Reviewed and Funded or Endorsed by Cancer Research UK
PROJECTED ACCRUAL: A total of 2,163 patients will be accrued for this study.
- Conditions
- Prostate Cancer
- Being tested
- conventional radiotherapy 74 Gy delivered in 37 fractions, hypofractionated radiation therapy 60 Gy in 20 fractions, hypofractionated radiation therapy 57 Gy in 19 fractions
- Keywords
- adenocarcinoma of the prostate, stage IIB prostate cancer, stage IIA prostate cancer, stage III prostate cancer
- Medical subject headings
- Prostatic Neoplasms
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
conventional radiotherapy 74 Gy delivered in 37 fractionsRadiation
hypofractionated radiation therapy 60 Gy in 20 fractionsRadiation
hypofractionated radiation therapy 57 Gy in 19 fractionsRadiation
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Control arm | Active comparator | conventional radiotherapy (74 Gy delivered in 37 fractions over 7·4 weeks) Receives: Radiation: conventional radiotherapy 74 Gy delivered in 37 fractions |
| Hypofractionated arm 1 | Experimental | Hypofractionated radiotherapy (60 Gy in 20 fractions over 4 weeks) Receives: Radiation: hypofractionated radiation therapy 60 Gy in 20 fractions |
| Hypofractionated arm 2 | Experimental | Hypofractionated radiotherapy (57 Gy in 19 fractions over 3·8 weeks) Receives: Radiation: hypofractionated radiation therapy 57 Gy in 19 fractions |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Time to biochemical or clinical failure
Phoenix consensus guidelines as a PSA concentration greater than nadir plus 2 ng/mL.
Measured: Defined as the time from randomisation to biochemical failure or prostate cancer recurrence up to 5 years
Secondary outcomes (5)
Disease-free survival
Measured: time from randomisation to any prostate cancer-related event or death from any cause up to 15 years
Overall survival
Measured: Time from randomisation to death from any cause up to 15 years
Development of metastases
Measured: Time from randomisation to development of metastases up to 15 years
Recommencement of hormonal treatment for disease recurrence
Measured: Time from randomisation to recommencement of hormone treatment for disease recurrence up to 15 years
Acute and late side-effects
Measured: Peak and week 18 bowel and bladder side-effects
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted26 Oct 2006 (estimated)
- Study start18 Oct 2002
- Primary completion8 Sep 2015
- Study completion17 Jun 2021 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (1)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Prostate CancerStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Institute of Cancer Research, United KingdomThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Enrolment
- 3,216 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Institute of Cancer Research, United Kingdom
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- David P. Dearnaley, FRCR, Study chair, Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00392535
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- CDR0000510112
- Other IDs
- ICR-CTSU-CHHIP-2006-10007, ISRCTN97182923, EU-20646
- Status last verified
- Feb 2019
- First submitted
- 25 Oct 2006
- Last updated
- 27 Feb 2019
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
Publications
Dearnaley D, Syndikus I, Mossop H, Khoo V, Birtle A, Bloomfield D, Graham J, Kirkbride P, Logue J, Malik Z, Money-Kyrle J, O'Sullivan JM, Panades M, Parker C, Patterson H, Scrase C, Staffurth J, Stockdale A, Tremlett J, Bidmead M, Mayles H, Naismith O, South C, Gao A, Cruickshank C, Hassan S, Pugh J, Griffin C, Hall E; CHHiP Investigators. Conventional versus hypofractionated high-dose intensity-modulated radiotherapy for prostate cancer: 5-year outcomes of the randomised, non-inferiority, phase 3 CHHiP trial. Lancet Oncol. 2016 Aug;17(8):1047-1060. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(16)30102-4. Epub 2016 Jun 20.
PubMed 27339115
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 27 Feb 2019. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Conventional or Hypofractionated High Dose Intensity Modulated Radiotherapy for Prostate Cancer: CHHIP
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00392535
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- CDR0000510112
- Conditions
- Prostate Cancer
- Keywords
- adenocarcinoma of the prostate, stage IIB prostate cancer, stage IIA prostate cancer, stage III prostate cancer
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Unknown status
- Enrolment
- 3,216 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Institute of Cancer Research, United KingdomUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 18 Oct 2002 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 8 Sep 2015 (actual)
- Study completion
- 17 Jun 2021 (estimated)
- First posted
- 26 Oct 2006 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
RATIONALE: Specialized radiation therapy that delivers a high dose of radiation directly to the tumor may kill more tumor cells and cause less damage to normal tissue. It is not yet known which schedule of intensity-modulated radiation therapy is more effective in treating patients with prostate cancer.
PURPOSE: This randomized phase III trial is studying the side effects of three schedules of intensity-modulated radiation therapy and compares how well they work in treating patients with localized prostate cancer.
Detailed description
OBJECTIVES:
- Determine the safety and efficacy of conventional vs hypofractionated high-dose intensity-modulated radiotherapy in patients with localized prostate cancer.
- Determine the side effects of these regimens in these patients.
- Determine whether hypofractionated radiotherapy schedules will improve the therapeutic ratio by either improving tumor control or reducing normal tissue side effects.
- Compare acute and late treatment-related gastrointestinal and urological toxicity in these patients.
- Determine different prostate-specific antigen-related endpoints for local failure and distant metastases.
- Extend the database of patients treated to escalated doses with dose-volume histograms (DVHs) of normal tissues at risk and relate these to common toxicity endpoints.
- Develop a model to estimate normal tissue complication probability (NTCP) of rectum and bladder for hypofractionated as well as conventional dose-escalated radiotherapy schedules.
OUTLINE: This is a multicenter, randomized, pilot study. Patients are stratified according to risk of seminal vesicle involvement (low-risk vs moderate-risk or high-risk).
- Hormone therapy: Patients receive androgen-deprivation therapy comprising an injection of luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone (LHRH) agonist once monthly for 3-6 months and oral cyproterone acetate beginning the week before the first LHRH agonist injection and continuing for at least 2 weeks after each LHRH agonist injection. Within one week after the last LHRH agonist injection, patients proceed to radiotherapy.
- Radiotherapy: Patients are randomized to 1 of 3 treatment arms.
- Arm I: Patients undergo conventional high-dose intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) in 37 fractions over 7.5 weeks.
- Arm II: Patients undergo hypofractionated high-dose IMRT in 20 fractions over 4 weeks.
- Arm III: Patients undergo hypofractionated high-dose IMRT in 19 fractions over 3.8 weeks.
In all arms, treatment continues in the absence of unacceptable toxicity.
Quality of life is assessed periodically during study treatment.
After completion of study treatment, patients are followed periodically for up to 15 years.
Peer Reviewed and Funded or Endorsed by Cancer Research UK
PROJECTED ACCRUAL: A total of 2,163 patients will be accrued for this study.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Number of arms
- 3
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Control arm | Active comparator | Radiation: conventional radiotherapy 74 Gy delivered in 37 fractionsconventional radiotherapy (74 Gy delivered in 37 fractions over 7·4 weeks) |
| Hypofractionated arm 1 | Experimental | Radiation: hypofractionated radiation therapy 60 Gy in 20 fractionsHypofractionated radiotherapy (60 Gy in 20 fractions over 4 weeks) |
| Hypofractionated arm 2 | Experimental | Radiation: hypofractionated radiation therapy 57 Gy in 19 fractionsHypofractionated radiotherapy (57 Gy in 19 fractions over 3·8 weeks) |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 120 years
- Sex
- Male only
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| conventional radiotherapy 74 Gy delivered in 37 fractions | Radiation | Control arm |
| hypofractionated radiation therapy 60 Gy in 20 fractions | Radiation | Hypofractionated arm 1 |
| hypofractionated radiation therapy 57 Gy in 19 fractions | Radiation | Hypofractionated arm 2 |
Primary outcome
Time to biochemical or clinical failure
Time frame: Defined as the time from randomisation to biochemical failure or prostate cancer recurrence up to 5 years
Phoenix consensus guidelines as a PSA concentration greater than nadir plus 2 ng/mL.
5 secondary outcomes
Disease-free survival
Time frame: time from randomisation to any prostate cancer-related event or death from any cause up to 15 years
Overall survival
Time frame: Time from randomisation to death from any cause up to 15 years
Development of metastases
Time frame: Time from randomisation to development of metastases up to 15 years
Recommencement of hormonal treatment for disease recurrence
Time frame: Time from randomisation to recommencement of hormone treatment for disease recurrence up to 15 years
Acute and late side-effects
Time frame: Peak and week 18 bowel and bladder side-effects
Results and safety
Results are not available in the source record.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 27 Feb 2019.
- Results publication: PubMed 27339115Dearnaley D, Syndikus I, Mossop H, Khoo V, Birtle A, Bloomfield D, Graham J, Kirkbride P, Logue J, Malik Z, Money-Kyrle J, O'Sullivan JM, Panades M, Parker C, Patterson H, Scrase C, Staffurth J, Stockdale A, Tremlett J, Bidmead M, Mayles H, Naismith O, South C, Gao A, Cruickshank C, Hassan S, Pugh J, Griffin C, Hall E; CHHiP Investigators. Conventional versus hypofractionated high-dose intensity-modulated radiotherapy for prostate cancer: 5-year outcomes of the randomised, non-inferiority, phase 3 CHHiP trial. Lancet Oncol. 2016 Aug;17(8):1047-1060. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(16)30102-4. Epub 2016 Jun 20.
- ISRCTN registryLink provided by the sponsor.
Related trials for Prostate Cancer
Active, not recruiting
Streamlined Geriatric and Oncological Evaluation Based On IC Technology
Breast Cancer, Comorbidities and Coexisting Conditions
Active, not recruitingObservational study
MRI Fusion Biopsy vs. Micro-Ultrasound Guided Biopsy
Prostate Cancer
Enrolling by invitationObservational study
Natural History Study of Early Life Exposures in Agriculture (ELEA)
Prostate Cancer, Leukemia
Not yet recruitingPhase 1/2
STAR0602 With Nivolumab in Non Small Cell Lung Cancer and in Metastatic Castrate-Resistant Prostate Cancer, and STAR0602 Alone in Thymic Carcinoma
NSCLC, Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
Recruiting
Rehabilitation and Sex Therapy to Optimize Recovery After Prostate Cancer Treatment
Prostate Cancer, Urinary Incontinence
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
David P. Dearnaley, FRCR study chair
Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust
26 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing conventional radiotherapy 74 Gy delivered in 37 fractions, hypofractionated radiation therapy 60 Gy in 20 fractions and hypofractionated radiation therapy 57 Gy in 19 fractions in people with Prostate Cancer, run by Institute of Cancer Research, United Kingdom at 26 sites in United Kingdom.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 27 Feb 2019. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 26 sites in United Kingdom. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
Results are not available in the source record.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Time to biochemical or clinical failure (time frame: Defined as the time from randomisation to biochemical failure or prostate cancer recurrence up to 5 years). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT00392535, which also lists 1 linked publication.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 27 Feb 2019.