Breast NeoplasmsNCT00393406
The Influence of Breast Cancer Risk and Risk Perception on Lifestyle Behaviors Among Women With a Family History: A Mixed Method Approach
An observational study of Breast Neoplasms, run by National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences (NIEHS) at 1 site in United States.
Trial summary
Lifestyle behaviors among women with a family history of breast cancer are likely to be influenced by a number of factors, including both objective risk factors and subjective risk, or perceived risk. The aims of this mixed method study are twofold and will be explored through both quantitative (i.e. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 35 to 74 years, women onlyHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Breast Neoplasms
- How many people
- 40 participants
- Where
- 1 siteUnited States
- Study dates
- 24 Oct 2006to 28 Oct 2008
- Phase
- Observational
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 35 to 74 years
- Women only
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Data from the first 20,000 women enrolled in the Sister Study will be utilized for the quantitative analysis.
- Participants for the qualitative study will include women living in North Carolina who reside within a three and a half hour driving distance from the researcher.
Who cannot join
- The only exclusion criteria for the selection of data from women in the Sister Study are as follows:
- women will be excluded if they were adopted because a complete family history is unlikely to be known;
- women will be excluded if they have had prior history of cancer, with the exception of non-melanoma skin cancer;
- women from racial/ethnic groups classified as "other" will also be excluded.
- The same exclusion criteria described above will also apply for the qualitative study.
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
United States1 site
NIEHS, Research Triangle Park
Research Triangle Park, North Carolina, 27709
About this study
Lifestyle behaviors among women with a family history of breast cancer are likely to be influenced by a number of factors, including both objective risk factors and subjective risk, or perceived risk. The aims of this mixed method study are twofold and will be explored through both quantitative (i.e. secondary survey data) and qualitative data (i.e. personal in-depth interviews) derived from the Sister Study, a large epidemiologic study being conducted through the National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, which is addressing risk factors for breast cancer in sisters of women who have had breast cancer. The quantitative aims include an exploration of lifestyle behaviors and behavioral differences between White and African American women, as well as well as an exploration of the relationships between lifestyle behaviors (i.e. varying levels of objective risk based on Gail model risk scores, medical risk-reducing factors (i.e. use of Tamoxifen or Raloxifene and/or prophylactic surgery), as well as additional factors that may be contributors to perceived risk. This aim will be addressed using data that have already been collected as part of the baseline activities for the Sister Study. The primary qualitative aim is to gain a better understanding about perceived risk and the relationship between perceived risk and lifestyle behaviors in both White and African American women with a family history of breast cancer. This aim requires the collection of new data through in-person interviews with between 28 and 40 women, depending on how many interviews are required to achieve "data saturation."
The mixed method approach will be based on a "complementarity" model, which emphasizes the use of two different methods to address different aspects of the research problem. Results from both methods will become integrated into the discussion of the findings and it is expected that this approach will enrich the study and allow for elaboration of the quantitative results. The secondary data analysis will be derived from approximately 10,000 women, initially enrolled in the Sister Study, who are between the ages of 35 and 74 and have had at least one sister affected by breast cancer. Women for the qualitative interviews will be recruited from a cohort of Sister Study participants residing within North Carolina and will include equal numbers of both White and African American women. It is expected that 28 women will be needed for qualitative data saturati...
Read the detailed description
Lifestyle behaviors among women with a family history of breast cancer are likely to be influenced by a number of factors, including both objective risk factors and subjective risk, or perceived risk. The aims of this mixed method study are twofold and will be explored through both quantitative (i.e. secondary survey data) and qualitative data (i.e. personal in-depth interviews) derived from the Sister Study, a large epidemiologic study being conducted through the National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, which is addressing risk factors for breast cancer in sisters of women who have had breast cancer. The quantitative aims include an exploration of lifestyle behaviors and behavioral differences between White and African American women, as well as an exploration of the relationships between lifestyle behaviors (i.e. varying levels of objective risk based on Gail model risk scores, medical risk-reducing factors (i.e. use of Tamoxifen or Raloxifene and/or prophylactic surgery), as well as additional factors that may be contributors to perceived risk. This aim will be addressed using data that have already been collected as part of the baseline activities for the Sister Study. The primary qualitative aim is to gain a better understanding about perceived risk and the relationship between perceived risk and lifestyle behaviors in both White and African American women with a family history of breast cancer. This aim requires the collection of new data through in-person interviews with between 28 and 40 women, depending on how many interviews are required to achieve "data saturation."
The mixed method approach will be based on a "complementarity" model, which emphasizes the use of two different methods to address different aspects of the research problem. Results from both methods will become integrated into the discussion of the findings and it is expected that this approach will enrich the study and allow for elaboration of the quantitative results. The secondary data analysis will be derived from approximately 10,000 women, initially enrolled in the Sister Study, who are between the ages of 35 and 74 and have had at least one sister affected by breast cancer. Women for the qualitative interviews will be recruited from a cohort of Sister Study participants residing within North Carolina and will include equal numbers of both White and African American women. It is expected that 28 women will be needed for qualitative data saturation (i.e. no new information comes forth) to occur.
The primary outcome measures for the quantitative component of the study are dietary fat intake, fruit and vegetable consumption, alcohol use and physical activity, which will all be measured categorically. Physical activities will first be converted into MET (metabolic equivalent) values and then MET values will be summed across all activities before categorizing into quartiles or quintiles. Qualitative data will be analyzed through content analysis, which will involve the identification of common themes or ideas expressed in response to questions from a semi-structured interview guide developed specifically to address the aims of the study.
- Conditions
- Breast Neoplasms
- Keywords
- Objective Risk, Gail Model, Subjective Risk, Medical Risk-Reducing Strategies, Physical Activity, Diet, Alcohol Use, Breast Cancer Risk
- Medical subject headings
- Breast Neoplasms, Motor Activity, Alcohol Drinking
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted27 Oct 2006 (estimated)
- Study start24 Oct 2006
- Study completion28 Oct 2008
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (3)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Breast NeoplasmsStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Observational
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Enrolment
- 40 participants
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences (NIEHS)
- Sponsor type
- US National Institutes of Health
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00393406
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 999907013
- Other IDs
- 07-E-N013
- Status last verified
- 28 Oct 2008
- First submitted
- 26 Oct 2006
- Last updated
- 2 Jul 2017
- Results posted
- No
Publications
Aiken LS, Fenaughty AM, West SG, Johnson JJ, Luckett TL. Perceived determinants of risk for breast cancer and the relations among objective risk, perceived risk, and screening behavior over time. Womens Health. 1995 Spring;1(1):27-50.
PubMed 9373372Ainsworth BE, Haskell WL, Leon AS, Jacobs DR Jr, Montoye HJ, Sallis JF, Paffenbarger RS Jr. Compendium of physical activities: classification of energy costs of human physical activities. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 1993 Jan;25(1):71-80. doi: 10.1249/00005768-199301000-00011.
PubMed 8292105Audrain J, Lerman C, Rimer B, Cella D, Steffens R, Gomez-Caminero A. Awareness of heightened breast cancer risk among first-degree relatives of recently diagnosed breast cancer patients. The High Risk Breast Cancer Consortium. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 1995 Jul-Aug;4(5):561-5.
PubMed 7549815
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 2 Jul 2017. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- The Influence of Breast Cancer Risk and Risk Perception on Lifestyle Behaviors Among Women With a Family History: A Mixed Method Approach
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00393406
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 999907013
- Conditions
- Breast Neoplasms
- Keywords
- Objective Risk, Gail Model, Subjective Risk, Medical Risk-Reducing Strategies, Physical Activity, Diet, Alcohol Use, Breast Cancer Risk
- Study type
- Observational
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 40 participants
- Lead sponsor
- National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences (NIEHS)US National Institutes of Health
- Study start
- 24 Oct 2006
- Study completion
- 28 Oct 2008
- First posted
- 27 Oct 2006 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Lifestyle behaviors among women with a family history of breast cancer are likely to be influenced by a number of factors, including both objective risk factors and subjective risk, or perceived risk. The aims of this mixed method study are twofold and will be explored through both quantitative (i.e. secondary survey data) and qualitative data (i.e. personal in-depth interviews) derived from the Sister Study, a large epidemiologic study being conducted through the National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, which is addressing risk factors for breast cancer in sisters of women who have had breast cancer. The quantitative aims include an exploration of lifestyle behaviors and behavioral differences between White and African American women, as well as well as an exploration of the relationships between lifestyle behaviors (i.e. varying levels of objective risk based on Gail model risk scores, medical risk-reducing factors (i.e. use of Tamoxifen or Raloxifene and/or prophylactic surgery), as well as additional factors that may be contributors to perceived risk. This aim will be addressed using data that have already been collected as part of the baseline activities for the Sister Study. The primary qualitative aim is to gain a better understanding about perceived risk and the relationship between perceived risk and lifestyle behaviors in both White and African American women with a family history of breast cancer. This aim requires the collection of new data through in-person interviews with between 28 and 40 women, depending on how many interviews are required to achieve "data saturation."
The mixed method approach will be based on a "complementarity" model, which emphasizes the use of two different methods to address different aspects of the research problem. Results from both methods will become integrated into the discussion of the findings and it is expected that this approach will enrich the study and allow for elaboration of the quantitative results. The secondary data analysis will be derived from approximately 10,000 women, initially enrolled in the Sister Study, who are between the ages of 35 and 74 and have had at least one sister affected by breast cancer. Women for the qualitative interviews will be recruited from a cohort of Sister Study participants residing within North Carolina and will include equal numbers of both White and African American women. It is expected that 28 women will be needed for qualitative data saturati...
Detailed description
Lifestyle behaviors among women with a family history of breast cancer are likely to be influenced by a number of factors, including both objective risk factors and subjective risk, or perceived risk. The aims of this mixed method study are twofold and will be explored through both quantitative (i.e. secondary survey data) and qualitative data (i.e. personal in-depth interviews) derived from the Sister Study, a large epidemiologic study being conducted through the National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, which is addressing risk factors for breast cancer in sisters of women who have had breast cancer. The quantitative aims include an exploration of lifestyle behaviors and behavioral differences between White and African American women, as well as an exploration of the relationships between lifestyle behaviors (i.e. varying levels of objective risk based on Gail model risk scores, medical risk-reducing factors (i.e. use of Tamoxifen or Raloxifene and/or prophylactic surgery), as well as additional factors that may be contributors to perceived risk. This aim will be addressed using data that have already been collected as part of the baseline activities for the Sister Study. The primary qualitative aim is to gain a better understanding about perceived risk and the relationship between perceived risk and lifestyle behaviors in both White and African American women with a family history of breast cancer. This aim requires the collection of new data through in-person interviews with between 28 and 40 women, depending on how many interviews are required to achieve "data saturation."
The mixed method approach will be based on a "complementarity" model, which emphasizes the use of two different methods to address different aspects of the research problem. Results from both methods will become integrated into the discussion of the findings and it is expected that this approach will enrich the study and allow for elaboration of the quantitative results. The secondary data analysis will be derived from approximately 10,000 women, initially enrolled in the Sister Study, who are between the ages of 35 and 74 and have had at least one sister affected by breast cancer. Women for the qualitative interviews will be recruited from a cohort of Sister Study participants residing within North Carolina and will include equal numbers of both White and African American women. It is expected that 28 women will be needed for qualitative data saturation (i.e. no new information comes forth) to occur.
The primary outcome measures for the quantitative component of the study are dietary fat intake, fruit and vegetable consumption, alcohol use and physical activity, which will all be measured categorically. Physical activities will first be converted into MET (metabolic equivalent) values and then MET values will be summed across all activities before categorizing into quartiles or quintiles. Qualitative data will be analyzed through content analysis, which will involve the identification of common themes or ideas expressed in response to questions from a semi-structured interview guide developed specifically to address the aims of the study.
Study design
- Time perspective
- Prospective
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 35 to 74 years
- Sex
- Female only
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (2 listed)
- Data from the first 20,000 women enrolled in the Sister Study will be utilized for the quantitative analysis.
- Participants for the qualitative study will include women living in North Carolina who reside within a three and a half hour driving distance from the researcher.
Key exclusion criteria (5 listed)
- The only exclusion criteria for the selection of data from women in the Sister Study are as follows:
- women will be excluded if they were adopted because a complete family history is unlikely to be known;
- women will be excluded if they have had prior history of cancer, with the exception of non-melanoma skin cancer;
- women from racial/ethnic groups classified as "other" will also be excluded.
- The same exclusion criteria described above will also apply for the qualitative study.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Primary outcome
Not reported in the source record.
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 2 Jul 2017.
- Background: PubMed 9373372Aiken LS, Fenaughty AM, West SG, Johnson JJ, Luckett TL. Perceived determinants of risk for breast cancer and the relations among objective risk, perceived risk, and screening behavior over time. Womens Health. 1995 Spring;1(1):27-50.
- Background: PubMed 8292105Ainsworth BE, Haskell WL, Leon AS, Jacobs DR Jr, Montoye HJ, Sallis JF, Paffenbarger RS Jr. Compendium of physical activities: classification of energy costs of human physical activities. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 1993 Jan;25(1):71-80. doi: 10.1249/00005768-199301000-00011.
- Background: PubMed 7549815Audrain J, Lerman C, Rimer B, Cella D, Steffens R, Gomez-Caminero A. Awareness of heightened breast cancer risk among first-degree relatives of recently diagnosed breast cancer patients. The High Risk Breast Cancer Consortium. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 1995 Jul-Aug;4(5):561-5.
Related trials for Breast Neoplasms
Active, not recruiting
Streamlined Geriatric and Oncological Evaluation Based On IC Technology
Breast Cancer, Comorbidities and Coexisting Conditions
RecruitingPhase 2
Gene Signatures to Guide HR+MBC Therapy in a Diverse Cohort
Invasive Mammary Carcinoma, Metastatic Breast Cancer
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Comparison of Reliability, Time Cost, and Participant Comfort of Lymphedema Assessments in Upper Extremity
Lymphedema, Upper Extremity Lymphedema
RecruitingPhase 3
A Study of Camrelizumab Plus Chemotherapy in Combination With or Without Famitinib as Neoadjuvant Therapy in Participants With Triple Negative Breast Cancer (BCTOP-T-N01)
TNBC - Triple-Negative Breast Cancer
RecruitingPhase 3
Testing Whether Hormone Therapy With Ribociclib is as Effective as Chemotherapy Followed by Hormone Therapy With Ribociclib for the Treatment of High Anatomic Stage Breast Cancer With Low Recurrence Risk, The RxFINE-Low Trial
Anatomic Stage II Breast Cancer AJCC v8, Anatomic Stage IIIA Breast Cancer AJCC v8
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
The record lists no contact. Use the official record to reach the sponsor.
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
An observational study of Breast Neoplasms, run by National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences (NIEHS) at 1 site in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 5 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 2 Jul 2017. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT00393406, which also lists 3 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 2 Jul 2017.