AzTrials
AzTrials

COPDPhase 2BREATHNCT00395083

Bronchitis and Emphysema Advice and Training to Reduce Hospitalization

A Phase 2 study testing COPD Self-management Education in people with COPD and Emphysema, run by US Department of Veterans Affairs at 22 sites in United States.

Terminated

Stopped early. The study ended before it was planned to and will not resume.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: Purpose: To evaluate the efficacy and cost-effectiveness of a novel intervention incorporating self-management education, an action plan, and case-management to decrease the risk of hospitalizations due to chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) among veterans with severe COPD. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 40 years and older
Conditions the study is for
COPD, Emphysema
What is being tested?
COPD Self-management Education
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
426 participants
Where
22 sitesUnited States
Study dates
Jul 2006to Sep 2010
Phase
Phase 2
Are there results?
Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 40 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Population to be studied
  • The study population consists of VA patients with COPD who receive some of their medical care at Veterans Affairs medical centers and were hospitalized for COPD in the last 12 months. To ensure that patients enrolled in the study receive regular care at the participating VA, we will include only patients enrolled in either the primary care or pulmonary clinic at the VA medical center and were seen at least once in the last year. This criterion should not significantly decrease the number of eligible patients because 90% of patients admitted for COPD in the VA had at least 1 outpatient visit to the VA primary care clinic in the year prior to their hospitalization based on data from the VA OPC in FY03.
  • Diagnosis of COPD confirmed by all of the following:
  • FEV1/FVC < 0.70
  • FEV1 < 80%
  • Age > 40 years
Show all 14Show fewer
  • A current or past history of cigarette smoking (> 10 pack-years)
  • COPD hospitalization in the previous year
  • Receives care at participating VA medical center
  • Enrolled in either primary care or pulmonary clinic at the VA
  • Seen at least once in the past year in either primary care or pulmonary clinic
  • No COPD exacerbations in last 4 weeks
  • English-speaking
  • Access to telephone

Who cannot join

  • Primary clinical diagnosis of asthma
  • Medical conditions affecting the ability to participate in the study such as:
  • Comorbid illness likely to limit life expectancy < 1 year
  • Decompensated heart failure
  • Dementia
  • Uncontrolled psychiatric illness
  • Participation in another clinical intervention trial in the previous 30 days

Trial locations and contacts

22 sites in 1 country.

22 sites in 1 country

United States22 sites
  • New Mexico VA Health Care System, Albuquerque

    Albuquerque, New Mexico, 87108-5153

  • VA Medical Center, Bay Pines

    Bay Pines, Florida, 33708

  • VA Western New York Healthcare System at Buffalo

    Buffalo, New York, 14215

  • VA Medical Center, Cincinnati

    Cincinnati, Ohio, 45220

  • VA North Texas Health Care System, Dallas

    Dallas, Texas, 75216

  • Atlanta VA Medical and Rehab Center, Decatur

    Decatur, Georgia, 30033

  • North Florida/South Georgia Veterans Health System

    Gainesville, Florida, 32608

  • Michael E. DeBakey VA Medical Center (152)

    Houston, Texas, 77030

  • Richard Roudebush VA Medical Center, Indianapolis

    Indianapolis, Indiana, 46202-2884

  • VA Medical Center, Kansas City MO

    Kansas City, Missouri, 64128

  • VA Medical Center, Lexington

    Lexington, Kentucky, 40502

  • VA Medical Center, Loma Linda

    Loma Linda, California, 92357

  • New York Harbor HCS

    New York, New York, 10010

  • VA Medical Center, Oklahoma City

    Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, 73104

  • VA Palo Alto Health Care System

    Palo Alto, California, 94304-1290

  • Carl T. Hayden VA Medical Center

    Phoenix, Arizona, 85012

  • VA Medical Center, Providence

    Providence, Rhode Island, 02908

  • Hunter Holmes McGuire VA Medical Center

    Richmond, Virginia, 23249

  • VA South Texas Health Care System, San Antonio

    San Antonio, Texas, 78229

  • VA Puget Sound Health Care System

    Seattle, Washington, 98101

  • Southern Arizona VA Health Care System, Tucson

    Tucson, Arizona, 85723

  • Robert J. Dole VAMC & ROC, Wichita

    Wichita, Kansas, 67218

Other trials in United States

About this study

Official title: CSP #560 - Bronchitis and Emphysema Advice and Training to Reduce Hospitalization (BREATH)

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:

Purpose: To evaluate the efficacy and cost-effectiveness of a novel intervention incorporating self-management education, an action plan, and case-management to decrease the risk of hospitalizations due to chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) among veterans with severe COPD.

Read more

Hypotheses:

Primary Hypothesis:

Veterans with COPD who receive a self-management program incorporating education sessions, development of an action plan, and case-management will have a decreased risk of COPD hospitalization compared to standardized COPD care.

Primary Objective:

In an intent-to-treat analysis, determine the efficacy of a comprehensive self-management program for reducing the risk of COPD hospitalization in veterans with severe COPD in comparison to patients receiving standardized COPD care.

Secondary Hypotheses:

Compared with standardized COPD care, veterans with COPD who receive a comprehensive self-management intervention will have: A) decreased health-related costs resulting from decreased hospitalizations and outpatient utilization, B) decreased hospitalization rates and average length of stay due to both COPD and all-cause admissions, and C) improvement in a set of outcomes including mortality, health-related quality of life, medication adherence, patient satisfaction, disease knowledge, skill acquisition and self-efficacy.

Secondary Objectives:

To evaluate the healthcare costs, hospitalization days, mortality, adherence, and health outcomes of a comprehensive self-management program compared to standardized COPD care among patients with severe COPD measured by:

A)Healthcare-related costs B)Health services use due to COPD and to all causes C)Clinical outcome measures

  1. Mortality
  2. Health-related quality of life measured by generic and COPD-specific measures
  3. Patient satisfaction
  4. Medication adherence
  5. Disease knowledge, skill acquisition and self-efficacy

In the proposed study, 960 veterans with severe COPD hospitalized in the previous year will be randomly assigned to either a comprehensive case management program or standardized COPD care. The comprehensive group will receive an initial, intense education program with development of an action plan, and regular telephone contacts by a case manager in addition to standardized COPD care. Patients allocated to the control arm will receive standardized care that incorporates guideline-based recommendations including influenza vaccination, a short-acting bronchodilator, and either a long-acting bronchodilator or inhaled corticosteroid inhaler.

The study will be conducted in 2 phases, a 12-month feasibility study conducted at 6 VA sites followed by the full study in which an additional 8 sites will enroll patients over the next 24 months. As a result, 180 patients will be initially enrolled in the feasibility study over the first year and the remaining 780 patients will be enrolled in the second and third years of the study when the full study is implemented. Subjects will be followed until the completion of the study, for at least one, and up to four years. The primary outcome is time to first COPD hospitalization.

Read the detailed description

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:

Purpose: To evaluate the efficacy and cost-effectiveness of a novel intervention incorporating self-management education, an action plan, and case-management to decrease the risk of hospitalizations due to chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) among veterans with severe COPD.

Hypotheses:

Primary Hypothesis:

Veterans with COPD who receive a self-management program incorporating education sessions, development of an action plan, and case-management will have a decreased risk of COPD hospitalization compared to standardized COPD care.

Primary Objective:

In an intent-to-treat analysis, determine the efficacy of a comprehensive self-management program for reducing the risk of COPD hospitalization in veterans with severe COPD in comparison to patients receiving standardized COPD care.

Secondary Hypotheses:

Compared with standardized COPD care, veterans with COPD who receive a comprehensive self-management intervention will have: A) decreased health-related costs resulting from decreased hospitalizations and outpatient utilization, B) decreased hospitalization rates and average length of stay due to both COPD and all-cause admissions, and C) improvement in a set of outcomes including mortality, health-related quality of life, medication adherence, patient satisfaction, disease knowledge, skill acquisition and self-efficacy.

Secondary Objectives:

To evaluate the healthcare costs, hospitalization days, mortality, adherence, and health outcomes of a comprehensive self-management program compared to standardized COPD care among patients with severe COPD measured by:

A)Healthcare-related costs B)Health services use due to COPD and to all causes C)Clinical outcome measures

  1. Mortality
  2. Health-related quality of life measured by generic and COPD-specific measures
  3. Patient satisfaction
  4. Medication adherence
  5. Disease knowledge, skill acquisition and self-efficacy

In the proposed study, 960 veterans with severe COPD hospitalized in the previous year will be randomly assigned to either a comprehensive case management program or standardized COPD care. The comprehensive group will receive an initial, intense education program with development of an action plan, and regular telephone contacts by a case manager in addition to standardized COPD care. Patients allocated to the control arm will receive standardized care that incorporates guideline-based recommendations including influenza vaccination, a short-acting bronchodilator, and either a long-acting bronchodilator or inhaled corticosteroid inhaler.

The study will be conducted in 2 phases, a 12-month feasibility study conducted at 6 VA sites followed by the full study in which an additional 8 sites will enroll patients over the next 24 months. As a result, 180 patients will be initially enrolled in the feasibility study over the first year and the remaining 780 patients will be enrolled in the second and third years of the study when the full study is implemented. Subjects will be followed until the completion of the study, for at least one, and up to four years. The primary outcome is time to first COPD hospitalization.

Exacerbations among patients with COPD result in costly emergency room visits and hospitalizations. The overall direct and indirect medical costs of COPD for the United States in 2000 were estimated to be in excess of $30 billion. In the VA health care system, there were 16,073 discharges for COPD in fiscal year 2003 at an average cost of $9,400 (2005 dollars). Disease management programs for COPD may improve patient self-care, improving symptoms and resulting in decreased exacerbations. However, implementing the types of published programs that use self-management education and case-management require additional resources for the VA. The COPD disease management program described in this proposal was developed by extensive modification of existing programs using the strongest theory-based and evidence-based elements, and takes advantage of existing VA systems. By targeting patients at high risk for exacerbations, this study focuses on the population in which the needs and potential impact are the greatest.

The intervention is designed to enable patients with COPD to manage their disease more effectively, by monitoring their symptoms and initiating appropriate action when their symptoms worsen. The elements of the program are developed using self-efficacy theory, a recognized and powerful predictor of health-related behavior change. The goal of the intervention is an informed and activated patient working with an informed, skilled case manager to improve self-management of COPD and ultimately clinical outcomes. Case-management programs are used to improve outcomes and to reduce health care utilization among patients with other chronic diseases such as diabetes, congestive heart failure and asthma, suggesting that this approach may be successful in COPD.

A study conducted in Canada by Dr. Bourbeau, a co-investigator for this proposal, suggests that an intensive home-based self-management education program and case-management reduce the risk of COPD hospitalizations by 35% over 1-year, and reduced average hospital days by 42%. Cost-savings resulting from decreased hospitalizations offset the cost of the intervention, and the intervention was potentially cost-saving. Relying on home visits, the intervention is not practical or affordable in the VA, and therefore this study evaluates whether a novel case-management intervention for COPD developed specifically for the VA will reduce hospitalizations without increasing overall health-care costs.

Because the majority of health care costs for patients with COPD are due to hospitalizations for exacerbations, COPD admissions are the primary outcome and the principal self-management goal. Assessing the cost-effectiveness of this intervention is a critical component of the proposed study, and will provide data for evidence-based decisions by VA physicians and managers regarding the management of COPD.

Conditions
COPD, Emphysema
Being tested
COPD Self-management Education
Medical subject headings
Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive, Emphysema

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • COPD Self-management EducationBehavioural

    The comprehensive self-management intervention incorporates self-management education, development of an action plan, and case management. The intervention is designed using the social cognitive theory with the Precede-Proceed Model which has guided other successful patient education programs.

Study groups in NCT00395083
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Group 1No interventionPatients allocated to the control arm will receive standardized care that incorporates guide-line based recommendations including influenza vaccination, a short-acting bronchodilator, and either a long-acting bronchodilator or inhaled corticosteroid inhaler.
Group 2ExperimentalThe comprehensive group will receive an initial, intense education program with development of an action plan, and regular telephone contacts by a case manager in addition to standardized COPD care.
Receives: Behavioral: COPD Self-management Education

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Hospitalization-free Survival - Time to Event

    Measured: From randomization until date of first hospitalization for COPD, assessed up to 26 months

  2. Hazard Ratio for First COPD Hospitalization

    Measured: 26 months

Secondary outcomes (2)
  1. Hazard Ratio for All-Cause Mortality

    Measured: 26 months

  2. Time to All-Cause Death

    Measured: From randomization until death, assessed up to 26 months

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted2 Nov 2006 (estimated)
  2. Study startJul 2006
  3. Primary completionSep 2010
  4. Study completionSep 2010

Why it stopped: The DMC detected an imbalance in safety outcomes between the two groups.

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 2
Primary purpose
Prevention
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
426 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT00395083
Sponsor's protocol ID
560
Acronym
BREATH
Status last verified
Sep 2014
First submitted
1 Nov 2006
Last updated
15 Sep 2014
Data monitoring committee
Yes

Publications

  • Fan VS, Gaziano JM, Lew R, Bourbeau J, Adams SG, Leatherman S, Thwin SS, Huang GD, Robbins R, Sriram PS, Sharafkhaneh A, Mador MJ, Sarosi G, Panos RJ, Rastogi P, Wagner TH, Mazzuca SA, Shannon C, Colling C, Liang MH, Stoller JK, Fiore L, Niewoehner DE. A comprehensive care management program to prevent chronic obstructive pulmonary disease hospitalizations: a randomized, controlled trial. Ann Intern Med. 2012 May 15;156(10):673-83. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-156-10-201205150-00003.

    PubMed 22586006

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 2 study testing COPD Self-management Education in people with COPD and Emphysema, run by US Department of Veterans Affairs at 22 sites in United States.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 14 inclusion and 7 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: stopped early, as of the sponsor's last update on 15 Sep 2014. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 22 sites in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this phase mean?

Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 21 Aug 2014). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Hospitalization-free Survival - Time to Event (time frame: From randomization until date of first hospitalization for COPD, assessed up to 26 months). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT00395083, which also lists 1 linked publication.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 15 Sep 2014.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in