AsthmaPhase 3BADGERNCT00395304
Childhood Asthma Research and Education (CARE) Network Trial - Best Add-On Therapy Giving Effective Response (BADGER)
A Phase 3 study testing fluticasone propionate + montelukast, fluticasone propionate and fluticasone propionate + salmeterol in people with Asthma, run by Milton S. Hershey Medical Center at 5 sites in United States.
Trial summary
Asthma is a common, serious illness among children in the United States. While a low dose of inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) may effectively control symptoms, some children may require additional medications to maintain adequate asthma control. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 6 to 18 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Asthma
- What is being tested?
- fluticasone propionate + montelukast, fluticasone propionate and fluticasone propionate + salmeterol
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 182 participants
- Where
- 5 sitesUnited States
- Study dates
- Mar 2007to Dec 2011
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 6 to 18 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Child, Adult
Who may be able to join
- Able to perform reproducible spirometry according to American Thoracic Society (ATS) criteria
- History of asthma symptoms (e.g., cough, wheezing, shortness of breath) and meets at least one of the following criteria:
- Naïve to controller therapy and meeting National Asthma Education and Prevention Program (NAEPP) criteria for mild-moderate persistent asthma (symptoms at least 2 days per week and/or night-time awakenings due to asthma at least 2 nights per month)
- Current uncontrolled asthma (meets NAEPP criteria for mild-moderate persistent asthma) while receiving an ICS dose greater than or equal to 200 ug per day of fluticasone equivalent or some form of non-ICS controller therapy (e.g., montelukast, theophylline, cromolyn)
- Asthma is currently under control while receiving an ICS dose between 300 to 400 ug per day of fluticasone equivalent and willing to consider changing current treatment to monotherapy with one dose of ICS (current standard of care)
- Asthma is currently under control while receiving some form of combination therapy, such as ICS less than or equal to 200 ug per day of fluticasone equivalent in addition to a non-ICS controller therapy (e.g., LABA, montelukast, theophylline, cromolyn), and willing to consider changing current treatment to monotherapy with one dose of ICS (current standard of care)
Show all 17Show fewer
- FEV1 reversibility of at least 12% following bronchodilator administration (4 puffs) at study visit 1. Individuals will need to hold albuterol, montelukast, theophylline, ipratropium bromide (or other anticholinergics) and LABAs per study instructions prior to reversibility testing. If an individual is receiving these types of medications prior to study visit 1, he/she may be brought back to the clinical center within 1 week following appropriate medication withholding to attempt qualification by reversibility criteria. If the individual does not meet this requirement, they may qualify for enrollment if their PC20 methacholine FEV1 is less than or equal to 12.5 mg/ml at the time of randomization. If FEV1 is less than 70%, thus precluding the methacholine challenge at this visit, then completion of the visit will be postponed several days and an additional attempt to obtain a methacholine challenge test will be made. If the methacholine challenge still cannot be performed, an individual may still qualify by reversibility criteria at this visit.
- History of clinical varicella or varicella vaccine; individuals needing the vaccine may receive it from their primary care physician prior to study entry
- Ability of parent to provide informed consent; verbal assent must be obtained from children less than 7 years of age and written assent must be obtained from children between 7 and 18 years of age
- If female, willing to use an effective form of contraception
- Prior to being randomly assigned to a treatment group, participants must meet the following criteria to remain in the study:
- Lack of acceptable asthma control during the 8-week screening period as defined by the following criteria:
- 1) On average, on more than 2 days per week, one or all of the following:
- Diary-reported symptoms
- The use of inhaled bronchodilator (not including pre-exercise)
- Peak flows in the yellow zone (less than 80% of post bronchodilator PEF value obtained at study visit 1) OR
- On average, more than 1 night-time awakening due to asthma, during each 2-week period
Who cannot join
- Corticosteroid treatment for any condition prior to study entry within the following defined timepoints:
- Oral - Use within 2 weeks of the screening visit
- Injectable - Use within 2 weeks of the screening visit
- Nasal - May be used at any time during the study at the discretion of the study investigator or primary care physician
- Current or prior use of medications known to significantly interact with corticosteroid disposition (within a 2-week period of study visit 1), including but not limited to carbamazepine, erythromycin or other macrolide antibiotics, phenobarbital, phenytoin, rifampin, or ketoconazole
- Pre-bronchodilator FEV1 less than 60% predicted at study visit 1
Show all 22Show fewer
- More than three hospitalizations for asthma in the year prior to study entry
- Presence of chronic or active lung disease other than asthma
- Significant medical illness other than asthma, including thyroid disease, diabetes mellitus, Cushing's disease, Addison's disease, hepatic disease, or concurrent medical problems that could require oral corticosteroids during the study or would place the participant at increased risk while participating in the study
- History of cataracts, glaucoma, or any other medical disorder associated with an adverse effect to corticosteroids
- Gastroesophageal reflux symptoms not controlled by standard medical therapy
- History of significant asthma exacerbation within 2 weeks of study visit 1 or more than 5 courses of systemic corticosteroids in the year prior to study entry
- History of a life-threatening asthma exacerbation requiring intubation, mechanical ventilation, or resulting in a hypoxic seizure within the 5 years prior to study entry
- History of adverse reactions to ICS, LTRA, or LABA preparations or any of their ingredients
- Receiving hyposensitization therapy other than an established maintenance regimen (i.e., continuous regimen for at least 3 months prior to study entry)
- Pregnant or breastfeeding
- Inability to perform study procedures
- Refusal to consent to a genotype evaluation
- Inability of the child to ingest the study drug
- Cigarette smoking or smokeless tobacco use in the year prior to study entry
- Current participation or participation in the month prior to study entry in another investigational drug trial
- Evidence that the family may be unreliable or nonadherent, or may move from the clinical center area before study completion
Trial locations and contacts
5 sites in 1 country.
5 sites in 1 country
United States5 sites
National Jewish Medical and Research Center
Denver, Colorado, 80206
University of Wisconsin - Madison
Madison, Wisconsin, 53792
Kaiser Permanente Medical Center
San Diego, California, 92111
Washington University School of Medicine
St Louis, Missouri, 63110
University of Arizona College of Medicine
Tucson, Arizona, 85724
About this study
Asthma is a common, serious illness among children in the United States. While a low dose of inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) may effectively control symptoms, some children may require additional medications to maintain adequate asthma control. This study compares the effectiveness of a higher dose of ICS, ICS combined with a long-acting beta-agonist (LABA) medication, and ICS combined with a leukotriene receptor antagonist (LTRA) medication at reducing the impact and severity of asthma exacerbations that occur in children with mild to moderate persistent asthma.
Read the detailed description
Almost 9 million children in the United States have asthma, and it is a leading cause of hospitalizations and school absenteeism. Common asthma symptoms include wheezing, shortness of breath, chest tightness, and coughing. While there is no cure for asthma, most children who receive proper treatment are able to control symptoms and lead a normal life. Low doses of ICS are commonly prescribed to prevent symptoms and keep asthma under control. While this is usually sufficient to prevent asthma attacks, some children do not respond well to low dose ICS alone. For these children, their asthma symptoms may be more effectively controlled by either receiving a higher dose of ICS or receiving LABA or LTRA medications in combination with a low dose of ICS. Both LABA and LTRA medications are used to help control moderate to severe asthma. The purpose of this study is to compare the effectiveness of a high dose of ICS versus a low dose of ICS plus either LABA or LTRA medication at improving asthma control and reducing the severity of symptoms that occur in children with mild to moderate persistent asthma.
This study began with an 8-week screening period during which participants were monitored while they used an inhaler with a low dose of ICS medication. During this time, participants also attended one or two study visits. At each visit, participants underwent a physical examination, exhaled nitric oxide analysis, and lung function and airway pressure testing. After enrollment criteria were met, participants underwent these same evaluations again, and they completed questionnaires to assess asthma control, quality of life, and home environmental factors. Blood was collected and a methacholine challenge test was completed, which artificially triggers an asthma attack to determine the severity of an individual's asthma. Participants then were randomly assigned to one of six treatment sequences, each of which includes the following three regimens in a different order:
- Low dose of ICS and salmeterol, a LABA medication
- Low dose of ICS and montelukast, a LTRA medication
- Double dose of ICS
Each treatment period lasted 16 weeks, with study visits occurring weekly. A physical examination, blood collection, lung function and airway pressure testing, a methacholine challenge test, and questionnaires occurred at selected visits. Throughout the study, participants recorded asthma symptoms, peak expiratory flow rates, and rescue medication usage in a daily diary. The entire length of the study did not exceed 56 weeks.
- Conditions
- Asthma
- Being tested
- fluticasone propionate + montelukast, fluticasone propionate, fluticasone propionate + salmeterol
- Medical subject headings
- Asthma
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
fluticasone propionate + montelukastDrug
Also called Flovent Diskus® + Singulair®
Dry-powder inhaler fluticasone 100 mcg bid (Flovent Diskus®, GlaxoSmithKline) plus Montelukast 5 or 10 mg qd (Singulair®, Merck)
fluticasone propionateDrug
Also called Flovent Diskus®
Dry-powder inhaler fluticasone 250 mcg bid (Flovent Diskus®, GlaxoSmithKline)
fluticasone propionate + salmeterolDrug
Also called Advair Diskus®
Dry-powder inhaler fluticasone + salmeterol combination 100 mcg/50 mcg bid (Advair Diskus®, GlaxoSmithKline)
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Sequence #1 | Experimental | fluticasone propionate + montelukast, followed by fluticasone propionate, followed by fluticasone propionate + salmeterol Receives: Drug: fluticasone propionate + montelukast; Drug: fluticasone propionate; Drug: fluticasone propionate + salmeterol |
| Sequence #2 | Experimental | fluticasone propionate + montelukast, followed by fluticasone propionate + salmeterol, followed by followed by fluticasone propionate Receives: Drug: fluticasone propionate + montelukast; Drug: fluticasone propionate; Drug: fluticasone propionate + salmeterol |
| Sequence #3 | Experimental | fluticasone propionate + salmeterol, followed by fluticasone propionate, followed by fluticasone propionate + montelukast Receives: Drug: fluticasone propionate + montelukast; Drug: fluticasone propionate; Drug: fluticasone propionate + salmeterol |
| Sequence #4 | Experimental | fluticasone propionate + salmeterol, followed by fluticasone propionate + montelukast, followed by fluticasone propionate Receives: Drug: fluticasone propionate + montelukast; Drug: fluticasone propionate; Drug: fluticasone propionate + salmeterol |
| Sequence #5 | Experimental | fluticasone propionate, followed by fluticasone propionate + salmeterol, followed by fluticasone propionate + montelukast Receives: Drug: fluticasone propionate + montelukast; Drug: fluticasone propionate; Drug: fluticasone propionate + salmeterol |
| Sequence #6 | Experimental | fluticasone propionate, followed by fluticasone propionate + montelukast, followed by fluticasone propionate + salmeterol Receives: Drug: fluticasone propionate + montelukast; Drug: fluticasone propionate; Drug: fluticasone propionate + salmeterol |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
The Number of Participants With a Differential Response to the Three Step-up Therapies Based on Fixed Threshold Criteria for the Following Three Asthma Control Measures: Use of Oral Prednisone for Acute Asthma Exacerbations, Asthma Control Days and FEV1.
One treatment period was ranked as better than another if the total amount of prednisone received during the period was at least 180 mg less, if the number of annualized asthma-control days during the final 12 weeks of the period was increased by at least 31 days, or if the FEV1 at the end of the period was at least 5% higher. If the prednisone threshold was met, then we ignored the number of asthmacontrol days and the FEV1. If the threshold for asthma-control days was met, then we ignored the FEV1. Otherwise, the order of response was determined by the FEV1.
Measured: Measured during the last 12 weeks of each 16-week treatment period
Secondary outcomes (13)
Change From Baseline in the Pre-bronchodilator Forced Expiratory Volume in One Second (FEV1) % Predicted
Measured: Measured during the last 12 weeks of each 16-week treatment period
Change From Baseline in the Post-bronchodilator FEV1 Percent Predicted
Measured: Measured during the last 12 weeks of each 16-week treatment period
Change From Baseline in the Pre-bronchodilator Forced Vital Capacity (FVC) % Predicted
Measured: Measured during the last 12 weeks of each 16-week treatment period
Change From Baseline in the Pre-bronchodilator FEV1/FVC Ratio
Measured: Measured during the last 12 weeks of each 16-week treatment period
Change From Baseline in the Morning Peak Expiratory Flow Rate (PEFR) % Predicted
Measured: Measured during the last 12 weeks of each 16-week treatment period
Change From Baseline in the Evening Peak Expiratory Flow Rate (PEFR) % Predicted
Measured: Measured during the last 12 weeks of each 16-week treatment period
Change From Baseline in the Peak Expiratory Flow Rate (PEFR) Variability
PEFR variability is calculated as 100% times the difference between the evening and morning PEFR values, divided by the average of the evening and morning PEFR values, i.e., PEFR variability = 100% x (morning PEFR - evening PEFR)/((morning PEFR + evening PEFR)/2)
Measured: Measured during the last 12 weeks of each 16-week treatment period
Change From Baseline in the Impulse Oscillometry Resistance at 5 Hertz
Change from baseline in the impulse oscillometry resistance at 5 Hertz, measured in kiloPascals per liters per second
Measured: Measured during the last 12 weeks of each 16-week treatment period
Change From Baseline in the Logarithm Base 2 of the Methacholine PC20
The methacholine PC20 is the concentration of methacholine that causes a 20% decrease in the pre-bronchodilator FEV1. The logarithm base 2 transformation converts the PC20 into doubling dilutions.
Measured: Measured during the last 12 weeks of each 16-week treatment period
Change From Baseline in the Natural Logarithm of Exhaled Nitric Oxide (eNO)
Measured: Measured during the last 12 weeks of each 16-week treatment period
Change From Baseline in the Asthma Control Test (ACT)
The ACT consists of five items, each scored as 1 (worst) to 5 (best). The five items are averaged.
Measured: Measured during the last 12 weeks of each 16-week treatment period
Change From Baseline in Asthma Quality of Life
Asthma quality of life is measured as the average of 23 questions, each of which is scored from 1 (worse) to 7 (best)
Measured: Measured during the last 12 weeks of each 16-week treatment period
Number of Participants With Asthma Exacerbations
An asthma exacerbation was defined as the administration of a course of oral/systemic prednisone for the treatment of asthma.
Measured: Measured during the last 12 weeks of each 16-week treatment period
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted2 Nov 2006 (estimated)
- Study startMar 2007
- Primary completionDec 2011
- Study completionDec 2011
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Publications (1)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for AsthmaStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Milton S. Hershey Medical CenterThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Crossover
- Masking
- Quadruple blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 182 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Milton S. Hershey Medical Center
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI)
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Vernon M. Chinchilli, PhD, Milton S. Hershey Medical Center
- Investigators
- David T. Mauger, PhD, Principal investigator, Penn State College of MedicineStanley J. Szefler, MD, PhD, Principal investigator, National Jewish HealthRobert F. Lemanske, Jr., MD, Principal investigator, University of Wisconsin, MadisonRobert S. Zeiger, MD, PhD, Principal investigator, Kaiser Permanente Medical CenterRobert C. Strunk, MD, Principal investigator, Washington University School of MedicineFernando D. Martinez, MD, Principal investigator, University of Arizona College of MedicineLynn M. Taussig, MD, Study chair, University of Denver
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00395304
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 444
- Other IDs
- 5U10HL064313, 5U10HL064288, 5U10HL064305, 5U10HL064295, 5U10HL064287, 5U10HL064307
- Acronym
- BADGER
- Status last verified
- May 2018
- First submitted
- 31 Oct 2006
- Last updated
- 2 Jul 2018
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
Publications
Lemanske RF Jr, Mauger DT, Sorkness CA, Jackson DJ, Boehmer SJ, Martinez FD, Strunk RC, Szefler SJ, Zeiger RS, Bacharier LB, Covar RA, Guilbert TW, Larsen G, Morgan WJ, Moss MH, Spahn JD, Taussig LM; Childhood Asthma Research and Education (CARE) Network of the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute. Step-up therapy for children with uncontrolled asthma receiving inhaled corticosteroids. N Engl J Med. 2010 Mar 18;362(11):975-85. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1001278. Epub 2010 Mar 2.
PubMed 20197425
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 2 Jul 2018. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Childhood Asthma Research and Education (CARE) Network Trial - Best Add-On Therapy Giving Effective Response (BADGER)
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00395304
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- BADGER / 444
- Conditions
- Asthma
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 182 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Milton S. Hershey Medical CenterUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI)
- Study start
- Mar 2007
- Primary completion
- Dec 2011 (actual)
- Study completion
- Dec 2011 (actual)
- First posted
- 2 Nov 2006 (estimated)
- Results
- Posted 17 Sep 2010
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Asthma is a common, serious illness among children in the United States. While a low dose of inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) may effectively control symptoms, some children may require additional medications to maintain adequate asthma control. This study compares the effectiveness of a higher dose of ICS, ICS combined with a long-acting beta-agonist (LABA) medication, and ICS combined with a leukotriene receptor antagonist (LTRA) medication at reducing the impact and severity of asthma exacerbations that occur in children with mild to moderate persistent asthma.
Detailed description
Almost 9 million children in the United States have asthma, and it is a leading cause of hospitalizations and school absenteeism. Common asthma symptoms include wheezing, shortness of breath, chest tightness, and coughing. While there is no cure for asthma, most children who receive proper treatment are able to control symptoms and lead a normal life. Low doses of ICS are commonly prescribed to prevent symptoms and keep asthma under control. While this is usually sufficient to prevent asthma attacks, some children do not respond well to low dose ICS alone. For these children, their asthma symptoms may be more effectively controlled by either receiving a higher dose of ICS or receiving LABA or LTRA medications in combination with a low dose of ICS. Both LABA and LTRA medications are used to help control moderate to severe asthma. The purpose of this study is to compare the effectiveness of a high dose of ICS versus a low dose of ICS plus either LABA or LTRA medication at improving asthma control and reducing the severity of symptoms that occur in children with mild to moderate persistent asthma.
This study began with an 8-week screening period during which participants were monitored while they used an inhaler with a low dose of ICS medication. During this time, participants also attended one or two study visits. At each visit, participants underwent a physical examination, exhaled nitric oxide analysis, and lung function and airway pressure testing. After enrollment criteria were met, participants underwent these same evaluations again, and they completed questionnaires to assess asthma control, quality of life, and home environmental factors. Blood was collected and a methacholine challenge test was completed, which artificially triggers an asthma attack to determine the severity of an individual's asthma. Participants then were randomly assigned to one of six treatment sequences, each of which includes the following three regimens in a different order:
- Low dose of ICS and salmeterol, a LABA medication
- Low dose of ICS and montelukast, a LTRA medication
- Double dose of ICS
Each treatment period lasted 16 weeks, with study visits occurring weekly. A physical examination, blood collection, lung function and airway pressure testing, a methacholine challenge test, and questionnaires occurred at selected visits. Throughout the study, participants recorded asthma symptoms, peak expiratory flow rates, and rescue medication usage in a daily diary. The entire length of the study did not exceed 56 weeks.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Crossover
- Masking
- Quadruple blind (participant, care provider, investigator, outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 6
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Sequence #1 | Experimental | Drug: fluticasone propionate + montelukast, Drug: fluticasone propionate, Drug: fluticasone propionate + salmeterolfluticasone propionate + montelukast, followed by fluticasone propionate, followed by fluticasone propionate + salmeterol |
| Sequence #2 | Experimental | Drug: fluticasone propionate + montelukast, Drug: fluticasone propionate, Drug: fluticasone propionate + salmeterolfluticasone propionate + montelukast, followed by fluticasone propionate + salmeterol, followed by followed by fluticasone propionate |
| Sequence #3 | Experimental | Drug: fluticasone propionate + montelukast, Drug: fluticasone propionate, Drug: fluticasone propionate + salmeterolfluticasone propionate + salmeterol, followed by fluticasone propionate, followed by fluticasone propionate + montelukast |
| Sequence #4 | Experimental | Drug: fluticasone propionate + montelukast, Drug: fluticasone propionate, Drug: fluticasone propionate + salmeterolfluticasone propionate + salmeterol, followed by fluticasone propionate + montelukast, followed by fluticasone propionate |
| Sequence #5 | Experimental | Drug: fluticasone propionate + montelukast, Drug: fluticasone propionate, Drug: fluticasone propionate + salmeterolfluticasone propionate, followed by fluticasone propionate + salmeterol, followed by fluticasone propionate + montelukast |
| Sequence #6 | Experimental | Drug: fluticasone propionate + montelukast, Drug: fluticasone propionate, Drug: fluticasone propionate + salmeterolfluticasone propionate, followed by fluticasone propionate + montelukast, followed by fluticasone propionate + salmeterol |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 6 to 18 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Child, Adult
Key inclusion criteria (17 listed)
- Able to perform reproducible spirometry according to American Thoracic Society (ATS) criteria
- History of asthma symptoms (e.g., cough, wheezing, shortness of breath) and meets at least one of the following criteria:
- FEV1 reversibility of at least 12% following bronchodilator administration (4 puffs) at study visit 1. Individuals will need to hold albuterol, montelukast, theophylline, ipratropium bromide (or other anticholinergics) and LABAs per study instructions prior to reversibility testing. If an individual is receiving these types of medications prior to study visit 1, he/she may be brought back to the clinical center within 1 week following appropriate medication withholding to attempt qualification by reversibility criteria. If the individual does not meet this requirement, they may qualify for enrollment if their PC20 methacholine FEV1 is less than or equal to 12.5 mg/ml at the time of randomization. If FEV1 is less than 70%, thus precluding the methacholine challenge at this visit, then completion of the visit will be postponed several days and an additional attempt to obtain a methacholine challenge test will be made. If the methacholine challenge still cannot be performed, an individual may still qualify by reversibility criteria at this visit.
- History of clinical varicella or varicella vaccine; individuals needing the vaccine may receive it from their primary care physician prior to study entry
- Ability of parent to provide informed consent; verbal assent must be obtained from children less than 7 years of age and written assent must be obtained from children between 7 and 18 years of age
Key exclusion criteria (22 listed)
- Corticosteroid treatment for any condition prior to study entry within the following defined timepoints:
- Current or prior use of medications known to significantly interact with corticosteroid disposition (within a 2-week period of study visit 1), including but not limited to carbamazepine, erythromycin or other macrolide antibiotics, phenobarbital, phenytoin, rifampin, or ketoconazole
- Pre-bronchodilator FEV1 less than 60% predicted at study visit 1
- More than three hospitalizations for asthma in the year prior to study entry
- Presence of chronic or active lung disease other than asthma
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| fluticasone propionate + montelukastAlso: Flovent Diskus® + Singulair®Dry-powder inhaler fluticasone 100 mcg bid (Flovent Diskus®, GlaxoSmithKline) plus Montelukast 5 or 10 mg qd (Singulair®, Merck) | Drug | Sequence #1, Sequence #2, Sequence #3, Sequence #4, Sequence #5, Sequence #6 |
| fluticasone propionateAlso: Flovent Diskus®Dry-powder inhaler fluticasone 250 mcg bid (Flovent Diskus®, GlaxoSmithKline) | Drug | Sequence #1, Sequence #2, Sequence #3, Sequence #4, Sequence #5, Sequence #6 |
| fluticasone propionate + salmeterolAlso: Advair Diskus®Dry-powder inhaler fluticasone + salmeterol combination 100 mcg/50 mcg bid (Advair Diskus®, GlaxoSmithKline) | Drug | Sequence #1, Sequence #2, Sequence #3, Sequence #4, Sequence #5, Sequence #6 |
Primary outcome
The Number of Participants With a Differential Response to the Three Step-up Therapies Based on Fixed Threshold Criteria for the Following Three Asthma Control Measures: Use of Oral Prednisone for Acute Asthma Exacerbations, Asthma Control Days and FEV1.
Time frame: Measured during the last 12 weeks of each 16-week treatment period
One treatment period was ranked as better than another if the total amount of prednisone received during the period was at least 180 mg less, if the number of annualized asthma-control days during the final 12 weeks of the period was increased by at least 31 days, or if the FEV1 at the end of the period was at least 5% higher. If the prednisone threshold was met, then we ignored the number of asthmacontrol days and the FEV1. If the threshold for asthma-control days was met, then we ignored the FEV1. Otherwise, the order of response was determined by the FEV1.
13 secondary outcomes
Change From Baseline in the Pre-bronchodilator Forced Expiratory Volume in One Second (FEV1) % Predicted
Time frame: Measured during the last 12 weeks of each 16-week treatment period
Change From Baseline in the Post-bronchodilator FEV1 Percent Predicted
Time frame: Measured during the last 12 weeks of each 16-week treatment period
Change From Baseline in the Pre-bronchodilator Forced Vital Capacity (FVC) % Predicted
Time frame: Measured during the last 12 weeks of each 16-week treatment period
Change From Baseline in the Pre-bronchodilator FEV1/FVC Ratio
Time frame: Measured during the last 12 weeks of each 16-week treatment period
Change From Baseline in the Morning Peak Expiratory Flow Rate (PEFR) % Predicted
Time frame: Measured during the last 12 weeks of each 16-week treatment period
Change From Baseline in the Evening Peak Expiratory Flow Rate (PEFR) % Predicted
Time frame: Measured during the last 12 weeks of each 16-week treatment period
Change From Baseline in the Peak Expiratory Flow Rate (PEFR) Variability
Time frame: Measured during the last 12 weeks of each 16-week treatment period
Change From Baseline in the Impulse Oscillometry Resistance at 5 Hertz
Time frame: Measured during the last 12 weeks of each 16-week treatment period
Change From Baseline in the Logarithm Base 2 of the Methacholine PC20
Time frame: Measured during the last 12 weeks of each 16-week treatment period
Change From Baseline in the Natural Logarithm of Exhaled Nitric Oxide (eNO)
Time frame: Measured during the last 12 weeks of each 16-week treatment period
Change From Baseline in the Asthma Control Test (ACT)
Time frame: Measured during the last 12 weeks of each 16-week treatment period
Change From Baseline in Asthma Quality of Life
Time frame: Measured during the last 12 weeks of each 16-week treatment period
Number of Participants With Asthma Exacerbations
Time frame: Measured during the last 12 weeks of each 16-week treatment period
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 2 Jul 2018.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- Results publication: PubMed 20197425Lemanske RF Jr, Mauger DT, Sorkness CA, Jackson DJ, Boehmer SJ, Martinez FD, Strunk RC, Szefler SJ, Zeiger RS, Bacharier LB, Covar RA, Guilbert TW, Larsen G, Morgan WJ, Moss MH, Spahn JD, Taussig LM; Childhood Asthma Research and Education (CARE) Network of the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute. Step-up therapy for children with uncontrolled asthma receiving inhaled corticosteroids. N Engl J Med. 2010 Mar 18;362(11):975-85. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1001278. Epub 2010 Mar 2.
- Click here for the Childhood Asthma Research and Education (CARE) Network web siteLink provided by the sponsor.
Related trials for Asthma
RecruitingPhase 1
Pilot Study to Identify the Mediators and Inflammatory Cell Surface Receptors Involved in Allergic Airway Inflammation
Asthma
RecruitingPhase 1
A Study to Compare the Relative Potency of Salbutamol Administered Via Metered Dose Inhalers (MDI) Containing Propellants HFA-152a to HFA-134a in Mild Asthmatics Aged 18 to 65 Inclusive
Asthma, Mild Asthma
RecruitingPhase 3
A Study Assessing the Effect of Dupilumab on Inducing Clinical Remission in Asthma
Asthma Control
Active, not recruitingPhase 2/3
Local Antibiotic Delivery for Community Acquired Pneumonia
Community Acquired Pneumonia (CAP)
RecruitingPhase 2
A Study to Learn About the Study Medicine Called PF-07275315 in People With Moderate-To-Severe Asthma
Asthma
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
David T. Mauger, PhD principal investigator
Penn State College of Medicine
Stanley J. Szefler, MD, PhD principal investigator
National Jewish Health
Robert F. Lemanske, Jr., MD principal investigator
University of Wisconsin, Madison
5 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 3 study testing fluticasone propionate + montelukast, fluticasone propionate and fluticasone propionate + salmeterol in people with Asthma, run by Milton S. Hershey Medical Center at 5 sites in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 17 inclusion and 22 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 2 Jul 2018. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 5 sites in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 17 Sep 2010). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
The Number of Participants With a Differential Response to the Three Step-up Therapies Based on Fixed Threshold Criteria for the Following Three Asthma Control Measures: Use of Oral Prednisone for Acute Asthma Exacerbations, Asthma Control Days and FEV1. (time frame: Measured during the last 12 weeks of each 16-week treatment period). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT00395304, which also lists 1 linked publication.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 2 Jul 2018.