AzTrials
AzTrials

Diabetes MellitusPhase 3NCT00395512

Efficacy of Alogliptin With Pioglitazone (Actos®) in Subjects With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus

A Phase 3 study testing Alogliptin and Pioglitazone in people with Diabetes Mellitus, run by Takeda at 161 sites in 23 countries.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the combination of alogliptin, once daily (QD), and pioglitazone in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus who are inadequately controlled with diet and exercise alone. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 80 years
Conditions the study is for
Diabetes Mellitus
What is being tested?
Alogliptin and Pioglitazone
Type of treatment
Pill or oral medicine
Could I receive a placebo?
Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
How many people
655 participants
Where
161 sitesin 23 countries
Study dates
Nov 2006to Feb 2008
Phase
Phase 3
Are there results?
Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 80 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Historical diagnosis of type 2 diabetes.
  • Failed treatment with diet and exercise for at least 2 months prior to Screening.
  • Is experiencing inadequate glycemic control as defined as glycosylated hemoglobin concentration between 7.5-11%, inclusive.
  • Has received any antidiabetic therapy for less than 7 days within 3 months prior to Screening.
  • Has a body mass index greater than or equal to 23 kg/m2 and less than or equal to45 kg/m2.
  • Fasting C-peptide greater than or equal to 0.8 ng per mL.
Show all 9Show fewer
  • Regular use of other, non-excluded medications is allowed if participant is on a stable dose for at least 4 weeks prior to Screening.
  • Females of childbearing potential who are sexually active must agree to use adequate contraception, and can neither be pregnant nor lactating from Screening throughout the duration of the study.
  • Must be willing and able to monitor their blood concentrations with a home glucose monitor.

Who cannot join

  • Systolic blood pressure greater than or equal to 160 mmHg and diastolic blood pressure greater than or equal to 100 mmHg.
  • Hemoglobin less than or equal to 12 g per dL for males and less than or equal to 10 g per dL for females.
  • Alanine aminotransferase greater than or equal to 2.5times the upper limit of normal.
  • Serum creatinine greater than 2.0 mg per dL.
  • Thyroid stimulating hormone level greater than the upper limit of normal range.
  • Major illness or debility that in the investigator's opinion prohibits the subject from completing the study.
Show all 22Show fewer
  • Urine albumin to creatinine ratio of greater than 1000 ug per mg at Screening. If elevated, the subject may be rescreened within 1 week.
  • History of cancer, other than squamous cell or basal cell carcinoma of the skin, that has not been in full remission for at least 5 years prior to Screening
  • History of laser treatment for proliferative diabetic retinopathy within 6 months prior to Screening.
  • History of gastroparesis.
  • Has New York Heart Association Class I to IV heart failure regardless of therapy.
  • History of coronary angioplasty, coronary stent placement, coronary bypass surgery, or myocardial infarction within 6 months prior to Screening.
  • History of any hemoglobinopathy that may affect determination of glycosylated hemoglobin.
  • History of infection with hepatitis B, hepatitis C, or human immunodeficiency virus.
  • History of a psychiatric disorder that will affect participant's ability to participate in the study.
  • History of angioedema in association with use of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors or angiotensin-II receptor inhibitors.
  • Any alteration in angiotensin-II receptor inhibitors within 2 months prior to Randomization, if applicable.
  • History of alcohol (defined as regular or daily consumption of more than 4 alcoholic drinks per day) or substance abuse (defined as illicit drug use) within 2 years prior to Screening.
  • Received any investigational drug within 30 days prior to Screening or a history of receipt of an investigational antidiabetic drug within 3 months prior to Screening.
  • Previously participated in an investigational study of SYR-322.
  • Glycosylated hemoglobin concentration between 7.5-11%, inclusive, and a fasting plasma glucose less than 310 mg per dL.
  • At least 75% compliant with the single-blind placebo regimen during the run-in/stabilization period.

Trial locations and contacts

161 sites in 23 countries.

161 sites in 23 countries

United States83 sites
  • Study site

    Altoona, Pennsylvania

  • Study site

    Arlington, Texas

  • Study site

    Arlington, Virginia

  • Study site

    Ashland, Oregon

  • Study site

    Augusta, Georgia

  • Study site

    Barnesville, Georgia

  • Study site

    Bay City, Michigan

  • Study site

    Benzonia, Michigan

  • Study site

    Billings, Montana

  • Study site

    Bossier City, Louisiana

  • Study site

    Charleston, South Carolina

  • Study site

    Charlotte, North Carolina

  • Study site

    Chicago, Illinois

  • Study site

    Cicero, New York

  • Study site

    Colleyville, Texas

  • Study site

    Columbiana, Alabama

  • Study site

    Columbus, Georgia

  • Study site

    Conroe, Texas

  • Study site

    Corpus Christi, Texas

  • Study site

    Dallas, Texas

  • Study site

    Elizabeth, New Jersey

  • Study site

    Elkton, Maryland

  • Study site

    Euless, Texas

  • Study site

    Fleetwood, Pennsylvania

  • Study site

    Florence, South Carolina

  • Study site

    Foothill Ranch, California

  • Study site

    Fort Worth, Texas

  • Study site

    Franklin, Ohio

  • Study site

    Garland, Texas

  • Study site

    Hamilton, New Jersey

  • Study site

    Harleysville, Pennsylvania

  • Study site

    Havertown, Pennsylvania

  • Study site

    Houston, Texas

  • Study site

    Hueytown, Alabama

  • Study site

    Huntsville, Alabama

  • Study site

    Irvine, California

  • Study site

    Jacksonville, Florida

  • Study site

    Jonesboro, Arkansas

  • Study site

    Katy, Texas

  • Study site

    Las Vegas, Nevada

  • Study site

    Lewisburg, West Virginia

  • Study site

    Libertyville, Illinois

  • Study site

    Little Rock, Arkansas

  • Study site

    Melbourne, Florida

  • Study site

    Miami, Florida

  • Study site

    Milwaukee, Wisconsin

  • Study site

    Mooresville, North Carolina

  • Study site

    Morristown, Tennessee

  • Study site

    Norfolk, Virginia

  • Study site

    Norristown, Pennsylvania

  • Study site

    North Dartmouth, Massachusetts

  • Study site

    Northeast, North Dakota

  • Study site

    Northern Cambria, Pennsylvania

  • Study site

    Northport, Alabama

  • Study site

    Northridge, California

  • Study site

    Ogden, Utah

  • Study site

    Orangeburg, South Carolina

  • Study site

    Penndel, Pennsylvania

  • Study site

    Philadelphia, Pennsylvania

  • Study site

    Picayune, Mississippi

  • Study site

    Port Charlotte, Florida

  • Study site

    Portage, Michigan

  • Study site

    Prince Frederick, Maryland

  • Study site

    Richmond, Virginia

  • Study site

    Saint Clair Shores, Michigan

  • Study site

    San Antonio, Texas

  • Study site

    San Diego, California

  • Study site

    San Mateo, California

  • Study site

    Santa Monica, California

  • Study site

    Savannah, Georgia

  • Study site

    Searcy, Arkansas

  • Study site

    Sebastian, Florida

  • Study site

    Seguin, Texas

  • Study site

    South Bend, Indiana

  • Study site

    South Miami, Florida

  • Study site

    St Louis, Missouri

  • Study site

    Sugarland, Texas

  • Study site

    Taylors, South Carolina

  • Study site

    Tomball, Texas

  • Study site

    Towson, Maryland

  • Study site

    Tucson, Arizona

  • Study site

    Williamston, South Carolina

  • Study site

    Winter Haven, Florida

Other trials in United States

Brazil7 sites
  • Study site

    Belém, Pará

  • Study site

    Curitiba, Paraná

  • Study site

    Fortaleza, Ceará

  • Study site

    Goiás, Goiás

  • Study site

    Marília, São Paulo

  • Study site

    Maringá, RP

  • Study site

    Mogi das Cruzes, São Paulo

Other trials in Brazil

Poland7 sites
  • Study site

    Bialystok

  • Study site

    Bytom

  • Study site

    Gdansk

  • Study site

    Gniewkowo

  • Study site

    Kamieniec Ząbkowicki

  • Study site

    Krakow

  • Study site

    Łęczyca

Other trials in Poland

Argentina6 sites
  • Study site

    Cap. Fed., Buenos Aires

  • Study site

    Chacabuco, Buenos Aires

  • Study site

    Córdoba

  • Study site

    La Plata, Buenos Aires

  • Study site

    Mar del Plata, Buenos Aires

  • Study site

    Morón, Buenos Aires

Other trials in Argentina

Hungary6 sites
  • Study site

    Budapest

  • Study site

    Eger

  • Study site

    Gyula

  • Study site

    Makó

  • Study site

    Nyíregyháza

  • Study site

    Pécs

Other trials in Hungary

India6 sites
  • Study site

    Bangalore, Karnataka

  • Study site

    Chennai, Tamil Nadu

  • Study site

    Chhatrapati Sambhajinagar, Maharashtra

  • Study site

    Hyderabad, Andhra Pradesh

  • Study site

    Mumbai, Maharashtra

  • Study site

    Nagpur, Maharashtra

Other trials in India

Israel6 sites
  • Study site

    Hadera

  • Study site

    Haifa

  • Study site

    Holon

  • Study site

    Jaffa Tel Aviv

  • Study site

    Jerusalem

  • Study site

    Nahariya

Other trials in Israel

South Africa6 sites
  • Study site

    Bellville, Western Province

  • Study site

    Cape Town, Western Province

  • Study site

    Durban, KwaZulu-Natal

  • Study site

    East Lynne, Pretoria

  • Study site

    Johannesburg, Gauteng

  • Study site

    Port Elizabeth, Eastern Cape

Other trials in South Africa

Slovakia5 sites
  • Study site

    Banska Bysterica

  • Study site

    Interna Klinika II, Nitra Region

  • Study site

    Lučenec

  • Study site

    Riverside

  • Study site

    Šahy

Other trials in Slovakia

Ukraine4 sites
  • Study site

    Dnipropetrovsk

  • Study site

    Kharkiv

  • Study site

    Lviv

  • Study site

    Odesa

Other trials in Ukraine

Australia3 sites
  • Study site

    Fitzroy, Victoria

  • Study site

    Frankston, Victoria

  • Study site

    Kingswood, New South Wales

Other trials in Australia

Mexico3 sites
  • Study site

    Aguascalientes

  • Study site

    Mexico City

  • Study site

    Monterrey

Other trials in Mexico

Romania3 sites
  • Study site

    Brasov

  • Study site

    Bucharest

  • Study site

    Galati

Other trials in Romania

Russia3 sites
  • Study site

    Kazan'

  • Study site

    Moscow

  • Study site

    Yekaterinburg

Other trials in Russia

Serbia3 sites
  • Study site

    Belgrade

  • Study site

    Kragujevac

  • Study site

    Niš

Other trials in Serbia

Lithuania2 sites
  • Study site

    Kaunas

  • Study site

    Kėdainiai

Other trials in Lithuania

New Zealand2 sites
  • Study site

    Christchurch

  • Study site

    Hamilton

Other trials in New Zealand

Bulgaria1 site
  • Study site

    Pleven

Other trials in Bulgaria

Chile1 site
  • Study site

    Santiago

Other trials in Chile

Croatia1 site
  • Study site

    Slavonski Brod

Other trials in Croatia

Estonia1 site
  • Study site

    Pärnu

Other trials in Estonia

Guatemala1 site
  • Study site

    Guatemala City

Other trials in Guatemala

Latvia1 site
  • Study site

    Riga

Other trials in Latvia

About this study

Official title: A Multicenter, Double-Blind Study to Determine the Efficacy and Safety of SYR-322 Plus Pioglitazone HCl (Actos®), SYR-322 Alone or Pioglitazone HCl Alone in Subjects With Type 2 Diabetes

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the combination of alogliptin, once daily (QD), and pioglitazone in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus who are inadequately controlled with diet and exercise alone.

Read the detailed description

There are approximately 19 million people in the United States who have been diagnosed with diabetes mellitus, of which 90% to 95% is type 2. The prevalence of type 2 diabetes varies among racial and ethnic populations and has been shown to correlate with age, obesity, family history, history of gestational diabetes, and physical inactivity. Over the next decade, a marked increase in the number of adults with diabetes mellitus is expected, placing an ever-increasing burden on families and the health care system.

Current pharmacologic interventions for type 2 diabetes mellitus include a diverse range of antidiabetic medications with different mechanisms of action including insulin and insulin analogues, sulfonylureas, metformin, meglitinides, thiazolidinediones, inhibitors of alpha- glucosidase, analogs of glucagon-like peptide-1, and synthetic analogues of human amylin. Despite the variety of medications, many have clinically important or potentially life-threatening side effects, restricted use in many subpopulations, concerns with long-term tolerability, and challenges related to compliance due to side effects and route of administration. All of these reasons contribute to the difficulties patients have reaching the target glycosylated hemoglobin level less than 7%.

SYR-322 (alogliptin) is a selective, orally available inhibitor of the dipeptidyl peptidase-4 enzyme. Dipeptidyl peptidase-4 enzyme is thought to be primarily responsible for the in vivo degradation of 2 peptide hormones released in response to nutrient ingestion, namely glucagon-like peptide-1 and glucose-dependent insulinotropic peptide. Both peptides exert important effects on islet beta cells to stimulate glucose-dependent insulin secretion as well as regulating beta cell proliferation and cytoprotection. Glucagon-like peptide-1, but not glucose-dependent insulinotropic peptide, inhibits gastric emptying, glucagon secretion, and food intake. Glucose-dependent insulinotropic peptide has been shown to enhance insulin secretion by direct interaction with a glucose-dependent insulinotropic peptide -specific receptor on islet beta cells. The glucose-lowering actions of glucagon-like peptide-1, but not glucose-dependent insulinotropic peptide, are preserved in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus.

Pioglitazone (ACTOS®) is a thiazolidinedione developed by Takeda Chemical Industries, Ltd. (Osaka, Japan) that is approved for the treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus. Pioglitazone is a selective peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-gamma agonist that decreases insulin resistance in the periphery and liver resulting in increased insulin-dependent glucose disposal and decreased hepatic glucose output.

As the rate of newly diagnosed cases of type 2 diabetes mellitus continues to grow, so does the need for products that will provide better glycemic control and improved safety and tolerability. Alogliptin and pioglitazone have complementary actions. Alogliptin inhibits the degradation of glucagon-like peptide-1 by inhibiting the enzyme dipeptidyl peptidase IV, thus augmenting glucose-dependent insulin secretion while pioglitazone is a peripheral and hepatic insulin sensitizer. Given the complementary mechanisms of action of alogliptin (stimulates insulin secretion) and pioglitazone (enhances insulin sensitivity), the addition of combination therapy in treatment naïve type 2 diabetes patients may potentially allow the patients to reach and maintain their glycosylated hemoglobin goal more effectively.

The aim of this study is to evaluate the effectiveness of the combination of alogliptin with pioglitazone in patients who are inadequately controlled on diet and exercise alone. Study participation is anticipated to be approximately 8.5 months.

Being tested
Alogliptin, Pioglitazone, Placebo
Keywords
Glucose Metabolism Disorder, Dysmetabolic Syndrome, Type II Diabetes, Diabetes Mellitus, Lipoatrophic, Dyslipidemia, Drug Therapy
Medical subject headings
Diabetes Mellitus, Glucose Metabolism Disorders, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2, Diabetes Mellitus, Lipoatrophic, Dyslipidemias

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • AlogliptinDrug

    Also called SYR-322

    Alogliptin tablets.

  • PioglitazoneDrug

    Also called Actos, AD4833

    Pioglitazone tablets.

  • PlaceboDrug

    Matching placebo tablets.

Study groups in NCT00395512
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Alogliptin 25 mg QDExperimentalAlogliptin 25 mg, tablets, orally, once daily and pioglitazone placebo-matching tablets, orally, once daily for up to 26 weeks.
Receives: Drug: Alogliptin; Drug: Placebo
Pioglitazone 30 mg QDActive comparatorPioglitazone 30 mg, tablets, orally, once daily and alogliptin placebo-matching tablets, orally, once daily for up to 26 weeks.
Receives: Drug: Pioglitazone; Drug: Placebo
Alogliptin 25 mg QD+ Pioglitazone 30 mg QDExperimentalAlogliptin 25 mg, tablets, orally, once daily and pioglitazone 30 mg, tablets, orally, once daily for up to 26 weeks.
Receives: Drug: Alogliptin; Drug: Pioglitazone
Alogliptin 12.5 mg QD + Pioglitazone 30 mg QDActive comparatorAlogliptin 12.5 mg, tablets, orally, once daily and pioglitazone 30 mg, tablets, orally, once daily for up to 26 weeks.
Receives: Drug: Alogliptin; Drug: Pioglitazone

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Change From Baseline to Week 26 in Glycosylated Hemoglobin (HbA1c)

    The change from Baseline to Week 26 in HbA1c (the concentration of glucose bound to hemoglobin as a percent of the absolute maximum that can be bound).

    Measured: Baseline and Week 26

Secondary outcomes (40)
  1. Change From Baseline in HbA1c Over Time

    The change from Baseline in HbA1c (the concentration of glucose bound to hemoglobin as a percent of the absolute maximum that can be bound) at 4 week intervals during the study. Least Squares Means were from an Analysis of Covariance (ANCOVA) model with treatment and geographic region as class variables and baseline HbA1c as a covariate.

    Measured: Baseline and Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16 and 20.

  2. Change From Baseline in Fasting Plasma Glucose Over Time

    The change from Baseline in fasting plasma glucose was assessed at weeks 1, 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20 and 26. Least Squares Means were from an ANCOVA model with treatment and geographic region as class variables and baseline plasma glucose as a covariate.

    Measured: Baseline and Weeks 1, 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20 and 26.

  3. Percentage of Participants With Marked Hyperglycemia

    Marked Hyperglycemia is defined as fasting plasma glucose greater than or equal to 200 mg/dL. Study week windows are defined to place hyperglycemia into visit categories.

    Measured: Weeks 1, 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20 and 26.

  4. Percentage of Participants Meeting Rescue Criteria

    Rescue was defined as meeting 1 of the following criteria, confirmed by a 2nd sample drawn within 5 days after the first sample and analyzed by the central laboratory:

    1. After more than 4 weeks of treatment but prior to the Week 8 Visit: a single fasting plasma glucose ≥310 mg/dL (≥17.5 mmol/L);
    2. From the Week 8 Visit but prior to the Week 12 Visit: a single fasting plasma glucose ≥275 mg/dL (≥15.27 mmol/L);
    3. From the Week 12 Visit through the End-of-Treatment Visit: HbA1c ≥8.5% and ≤0.5% reduction in HbA1c as compared with the Baseline HbA1c.

    Measured: Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20 and 26.

  5. Percentage of Participants With Glycosylated Hemoglobin Less Than or Equal to 6.5%

    Clinical response at Week 26 was assessed by the percentage of participants with HbA1c ≤6.5%.

    Measured: Week 26

  6. Percentage of Participants With Glycosylated Hemoglobin Less Than or Equal to 7.0%

    Clinical response at Week 26 was assessed by the percentage of participants with HbA1c ≤ 7%.

    Measured: Week 26

  7. Percentage of Participants With Glycosylated Hemoglobin Less Than or Equal to 7.5%

    Clinical response at Week 26 was assessed by the percentage of participants with HbA1c ≤ 7.5%.

    Measured: Week 26

  8. Percentage of Participants With a Decrease in Glycosylated Hemoglobin Greater Than or Equal to 0.5%

    Clinical response at Week 26 was assessed by the percentage of participants with a decrease from Baseline in HbA1c of ≥ 0.5%.

    Measured: Baseline and Week 26

  9. Percentage of Participants With a Decrease in Glycosylated Hemoglobin Greater Than or Equal to 1.0%

    Clinical response at Week 26 was assessed by the percentage of participants with a decrease from Baseline in HbA1c of ≥ 1%.

    Measured: Baseline and Week 26

  10. Percentage of Participants With a Decrease in Glycosylated Hemoglobin Greater Than or Equal to 1.5%.

    Clinical response at Week 26 was assessed by the percentage of participants with a decrease from Baseline in HbA1c of ≥ 1.5%.

    Measured: Baseline and Week 26

  11. Percentage of Participants With a Decrease in Glycosylated Hemoglobin Greater Than or Equal to 2.0%

    Clinical response at Week 26 was assessed by the percentage of participants with a decrease from Baseline in HbA1c of ≥ 2.0%.

    Measured: Baseline and Week 26

  12. Change From Baseline in Fasting Proinsulin

    Proinsulin is a precursor to insulin, and was measured as an indicator of pancreatic function. The change from Baseline in fasting proinsulin was assessed at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20 and 26. Least Squares Means were from an ANCOVA model with treatment and geographic region as class variables and baseline proinsulin as a covariate.

    Measured: Baseline and Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20 and 26.

  13. Change From Baseline in Insulin

    The change from Baseline in fasting insulin was assessed at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20 and 26. Least Squares Means were from an ANCOVA model with treatment and geographic region as class variables and baseline insulin as a covariate.

    Measured: Baseline and Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20 and 26.

  14. Change From Baseline in Proinsulin/Insulin Ratio

    The ratio of proinsulin to insulin was calculated as proinsulin (pmol/L) / insulin (μIU/mL) at weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20 and 26 relative to the Baseline value. Least squares means were from an ANCOVA model with treatment and geographic region as class variables and Baseline proinsulin/insulin ratio as a covariate.

    Measured: Baseline and Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20 and 26.

  15. Change From Baseline in C-peptide Levels

    C-peptide is a byproduct created when the hormone insulin is produced and is measured by a blood test. Change from Baseline was assessed at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20 and 26. Least squares means are from an ANCOVA model with treatment and geographic region as class variables and baseline C-peptide as a covariate.

    Measured: Baseline and Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20 and 26.

  16. Change From Baseline in Calculated Homeostatic Model Assessment Insulin Resistance

    The Homeostasis Model Assessment of insulin resistance (HOMA IR) measures insulin resistance based on fasting glucose and insulin measurements:

    HOMA IR = fasting plasma insulin (µIU/mL) * fasting plasma glucose (mmol/L) / 22.5

    A higher number indicates a greater degree of insulin resistance. The change from Baseline in HOMA IR was assessed at Weeks 12 and 26. Least squares means are from an ANCOVA model with treatment and geographic region as class variables and baseline HOMA IR as a covariate.

    Measured: Baseline and Weeks 12 and 26.

  17. Change From Baseline in Homeostatic Model Assessment Beta Cell Function

    The Homeostasis Model Assessment (HOMA) estimates steady state beta cell function (%B) as a percentage of a normal reference population.

    HOMA %B = 20 * insulin (µIU/mL) / fasting plasma glucose (mmol/L) - 3.5

    The change from Baseline in the homeostasis model assessment of beta cell function was assessed at Weeks 12 and 26. Least squares means are from an ANCOVA model with treatment and geographic region as class variables and baseline HOMA beta cell function as a covariate.

    Measured: Baseline and Weeks 12 and 26.

  18. Change From Baseline in Body Weight

    Change from Baseline in body weight was assessed at Weeks 8, 12, 20 and 26. Least squares means are from an ANCOVA model with treatment and geographic region as class variables and Baseline weight as a covariate.

    Measured: Baseline and Weeks 8, 12, 20 and 26.

  19. Change From Baseline in Total Cholesterol Level

    Change from Baseline in total cholesterol level was assessed at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20 and 26. Least squares means are from an ANCOVA model with treatment and geographic region as class variables and baseline total cholesterol as a covariate.

    Measured: Baseline and Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20 and 26.

  20. Change From Baseline in Low-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol

    Change from Baseline in low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) was assessed at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20 and 26. Least squares means are from an ANCOVA model with treatment and geographic region as class variables and baseline LDL cholesterol as a covariate.

    Measured: Baseline and Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20 and 26.

  21. Change From Baseline in High-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol

    Change from Baseline in high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) was assessed at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20 and 26. Least squares means are from an ANCOVA model with treatment and geographic region as class variables and baseline HDL cholesterol as a covariate.

    Measured: Baseline and Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20 and 26.

  22. Change From Baseline in Triglyceride Levels

    Change from Baseline in triglycerides was assessed at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20 and 26. Least squares means are from an ANCOVA model with treatment and geographic region as class variables and baseline triglycerides as a covariate.

    Measured: Baseline and Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20 and 26.

  23. Change From Baseline in Free Fatty Acids

    Change from Baseline in free fatty acids (FFA) was assessed at Weeks 12 and 26. Least squares means are from an ANCOVA model with treatment and geographic region as class variables and baseline free fatty acid as a covariate.

    Measured: Baseline and Weeks 12 and 26.

  24. Change From Baseline in Plasminogen Activator Inhibitor-1

    Change from Baseline in plasminogen activator inhibitor-1 was assessed at Weeks 12 and 26. Least squares means are from an ANCOVA model with treatment and geographic region as class variables and baseline plasminogen activator inhibitor-1 as a covariate.

    Measured: Baseline and Weeks 12 and 26.

  25. Change From Baseline in High-sensitivity C-Reactive Protein

    Change from Baseline in high-sensitivity C-Reactive Protein (hsCRP) was assessed at Weeks 12 and 26. Least squares means are from an ANCOVA model with treatment and geographic region as class variables and baseline hsCRP as a covariate.

    Measured: Baseline and Weeks 12 and 26.

  26. Change From Baseline in Adiponectin

    Change from Baseline in adiponectin was assessed at Weeks 12 and 26. Least squares means are from an ANCOVA model with treatment and geographic region as class variables and baseline adiponectin as a covariate.

    Measured: Baseline and Weeks 12 and 26.

  27. Change From Baseline in Apolipoprotein A1

    Change from Baseline in Apolipoprotein A1 was assessed at Weeks 12 and 26. Least squares means are from an ANCOVA model with treatment and geographic region as class variables and Baseline apolipoprotein A1 as a covariate.

    Measured: Baseline and Weeks 12 and 26.

  28. Change From Baseline in Apolipoprotein A2

    Change from Baseline in apolipoprotein A2 was assessed at Weeks 12 and 26. Least squares means are from an ANCOVA model with treatment and geographic region as class variables and baseline apolipoprotein A2 as a covariate.

    Measured: Baseline and Weeks 12 and 26.

  29. Change From Baseline in Apolipoprotein B

    Change from Baseline in apolipoprotein B was assessed at Weeks 12 and 26. Least squares means are from an ANCOVA model with treatment and geographic region as class variables and baseline apolipoprotein B as a covariate.

    Measured: Baseline and Weeks 12 and 26.

  30. Change From Baseline in Apolipoprotein C-III

    Change from Baseline in apolipoprotein C-III was assessed at Weeks 12 and 26. Least squares means are from an ANCOVA model with treatment and geographic region as class variables and baseline apolipoprotein C-III as a covariate.

    Measured: Baseline and Weeks 12 and 26.

  31. Change From Baseline in Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Lipid Fractionation Total Triglycerides

    Nuclear Magnetic Resonance (NMR) lipid fractionation was used to assess the change from Baseline in total triglyceride levels at Weeks 12 and 26. Least squares means are from an ANCOVA model with treatment and geographic region as class variables and baseline NMR total triglycerides as a covariate.

    Measured: Baseline and Weeks 12 and 26.

  32. Change From Baseline in Very Low Density Lipoprotein (VLDL) / Chylomicron Particles

    The change from Baseline in levels of total VLDL/chylomicron particles and large VLDL/chylomicron particles was assessed by NMR lipid fractionation at Weeks 12 and 26.

    Least squares means are from an ANCOVA model with treatment and geographic region as class variables and baseline VLDL/chylomicron particles as a covariate.

    Measured: Baseline and Weeks 12 and 26.

  33. Change From Baseline in VLDL / Chylomicron Triglycerides

    The change from Baseline in levels of VLDL/chylomicron triglycerides was assessed by NMR lipid fractionation at Weeks 12 and 26.

    Least squares means are from an ANCOVA model with treatment and geographic region as class variables and baseline VLDL/chylomicron triglycerides as a covariate.

    Measured: Baseline and Weeks 12 and 26.

  34. Change From Baseline in VLDL Particles

    The change from Baseline in levels of medium VLDL particles and small VLDL particles was assessed by NMR fractionation at Weeks 12 and 26.

    Least squares means are from an ANCOVA model with treatment and geographic region as class variables and baseline VLDL particles as a covariate.

    Measured: Baseline and Weeks 12 and 26.

  35. Change From Baseline in Mean VLDL Particle Size

    Change from Baseline in mean VLDL particle size was assessed by NMR lipid fractionation at Weeks 12 and 26. Least squares means are from an ANCOVA model with treatment and geographic region as class variables and baseline mean VLDL particle size as a covariate.

    Measured: Baseline and Weeks 12 and 26.

  36. Change From Baseline in Intermediate Density Lipoprotein (IDL) Particles

    The change from Baseline in levels of IDL particles was assessed by NMR fractionation at Weeks 12 and 26.

    Least squares means are from an ANCOVA model with treatment and geographic region as class variables and baseline IDL particles as a covariate.

    Measured: Baseline and Weeks 12 and 26.

  37. Change From Baseline in Low Density Lipoprotein (LDL) Particles

    The change from Baseline in levels of total, large, medium-small, total small and very small LDL particles was assessed by NMR fractionation at Weeks 12 and 26.

    Least squares means are from an ANCOVA model with treatment and geographic region as class variables and baseline LDL particles as a covariate.

    Measured: Baseline and Weeks 12 and 26.

  38. Change From Baseline in Mean LDL Particle Size

    Change from Baseline in mean LDL particle size was assessed by NMR lipid fractionation at Weeks 12 and 26. Least squares means are from an ANCOVA model with treatment and geographic region as class variables and baseline mean LDL particle size as a covariate.

    Measured: Baseline and Weeks 12 and 26.

  39. Change From Baseline in High Density Lipoprotein (HDL) Particles

    The change from Baseline in levels of total, large, medium and small HDL particles was assessed by NMR fractionation at Weeks 12 and 26.

    Least squares means are from an ANCOVA model with treatment and geographic region as class variables and baseline HDL particles as a covariate.

    Measured: Baseline and Weeks 12 and 26.

  40. Change From Baseline in Mean HDL Particle Size

    Change from Baseline in mean HDL particle size was assessed by NMR lipid fractionation at Weeks 12 and 26. Least squares means are from an ANCOVA model with treatment and geographic region as class variables and baseline mean HDL particle size as a covariate.

    Measured: Baseline and Weeks 12 and 26.

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted3 Nov 2006 (estimated)
  2. Study startNov 2006
  3. Primary completionFeb 2008
  4. Study completionFeb 2008

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 3
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Quadruple blind
Who is masked
Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor
Enrolment
655 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT00395512
Sponsor's protocol ID
01-06-TL-322OPI-002
Other IDs
2006-005492-17, U1111-1113-8616
Status last verified
Feb 2013
First submitted
1 Nov 2006
Last updated
27 Mar 2013
Data monitoring committee
No

Publications

  • Rosenstock J, Inzucchi SE, Seufert J, Fleck PR, Wilson CA, Mekki Q. Initial combination therapy with alogliptin and pioglitazone in drug-naive patients with type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Care. 2010 Nov;33(11):2406-8. doi: 10.2337/dc10-0159. Epub 2010 Aug 19.

    PubMed 20724648

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 3 study testing Alogliptin and Pioglitazone in people with Diabetes Mellitus, run by Takeda at 161 sites in 23 countries.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 9 inclusion and 22 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 27 Mar 2013. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 161 sites in United States, Brazil, Poland, Argentina, Hungary and 18 more countries. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this phase mean?

Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 27 Mar 2013). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Change From Baseline to Week 26 in Glycosylated Hemoglobin (HbA1c) (time frame: Baseline and Week 26). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT00395512, which also lists 1 linked publication.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 27 Mar 2013.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in