DialysisPhase 3NCT00395824
Citrate Anticoagulation vs. Heparin-Coated Dialyzers
A Phase 3 study testing anticoagulation procedure in people with Dialysis, run by Universitaire Ziekenhuizen KU Leuven at 1 site in Belgium.
Trial summary
Hemodialysis causes contact activation of the coagulation pathway (1). For this reason, unfractionated or low molecular weight heparins are administered in daily practice to prevent thrombosis of the dialyzer and blood circuit, but the dose commonly used causes systemic anticoagulation. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Dialysis
- What is being tested?
- anticoagulation procedure
- Type of treatment
- Surgery or procedure
- How many people
- 33 participants
- Where
- 1 siteBelgium
- Study dates
- Jan 2005to Sep 2005
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- aged over 18 years
- chronic kidney disease stage 5 requiring intermittent hemodialysis
- at risk of bleeding
- written informed consent
Who cannot join
- any haemostatic disorder favouring either bleeding or clotting
- anti-vitamin K or heparin treatment
- heparin induced thrombocytopenia
- haemodynamic instability
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
Official title: Heparin-Coated Polyacrylonitrile Membrane Versus Regional Citrate Anticoagulation: a Prospective Randomised Study of 2 Anticoagulation Strategies in Patients at Risk of Bleeding
Hemodialysis causes contact activation of the coagulation pathway (1). For this reason, unfractionated or low molecular weight heparins are administered in daily practice to prevent thrombosis of the dialyzer and blood circuit, but the dose commonly used causes systemic anticoagulation. This can cause serious complications in patients with high risk of bleeding. Regional and low-dose heparinization, use of prostacycline, regional citrate anticoagulation (RCA), and high-flow-rate hemodialysis without anticoagulation have been shown to reduce bleeding complications. Each of these methods, however, is characterized by its own technical difficulties, limitations, or complications.
The present study aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of heparin-coated polyacrylonitrile membranes (AN69ST) and regional citrate anticoagulation in hemodialysis patients at risk of bleeding
Read the detailed description
- Open label single centre prospective randomized trial including 33 patients aged over 18 years with chronic kidney disease stage 5 requiring intermittent hemodialysis at the University Hospital Leuven and at risk of bleeding. Exclusion criteria were: any haemostatic disorder favouring either bleeding or clotting, anti-vitamin K or heparin treatment, heparin induced thrombocytopenia and haemodynamic instability. Written informed consent before enrolment.
- Random allocation (by sealed enveloppe) to RCA with a calcium free dialysate (RCA-Ca0), RCA with a calcium containing dialysate (RCA-Ca1,5) or to anticoagulant-free hemodiaysis with a heparin-coated polyacrylonitrile membrane (Nephral 300ST®).
- At the end of each dialysis session, arterial and venous drip chambers and the filter will be inspected for visible signs of coagulation. Corresponding to the standard care at our dialysis unit, a semi-quantitative score with a range from 0 (no signs of clotting) to 4 (complete occlusion) will be used for evaluation of the dialyzer. By definition, the drip chamber will be considered clotted when a thrombus was visible after the rinse back procedure. A fibrin ring against the wall of the drip chamber will be considered normal.
- Blood samples for assessment of prothrombin fragment F1+2 and d-dimers will be collected from the inlet blood catheter prior to hemodialysis initiation and during hemodialysis at T15, T120 and T238.
- Conditions
- Dialysis
- Being tested
- anticoagulation procedure
- Keywords
- citrate, anticoagulation, heparin-coated membrane
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
anticoagulation procedureProcedure or surgery
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
anticoagulation efficacy as evaluated by clotting score of dialyser
anticoagulation efficacy as evaluated by occurrence of major and minor clotting events
anticoagulation efficacy as evaluated by instantaneous blood clearances
Secondary outcomes (1)
anticoagulation efficay as evaluated by time course of coagulation parameters
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted3 Nov 2006 (estimated)
- Study startJan 2005
- Study completionSep 2005
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (2)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for DialysisStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Universitaire Ziekenhuizen KU LeuvenThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 33 participants
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Universitaire Ziekenhuizen KU Leuven
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Investigators
- Pieter Evenepoel, MD, PhD, Principal investigator, Universitaire Ziekenhuizen KU Leuven
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00395824
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- pe2006-01
- Status last verified
- Nov 2006
- First submitted
- 2 Nov 2006
- Last updated
- 3 Nov 2006
- Results posted
- No
Publications
Natale P, Palmer SC, Ruospo M, Longmuir H, Dodds B, Prasad R, Batt TJ, Jose MD, Strippoli GF. Anticoagulation for people receiving long-term haemodialysis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2024 Jan 8;1(1):CD011858. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011858.pub2.
PubMed 38189593Evenepoel P, Dejagere T, Verhamme P, Claes K, Kuypers D, Bammens B, Vanrenterghem Y. Heparin-coated polyacrylonitrile membrane versus regional citrate anticoagulation: a prospective randomized study of 2 anticoagulation strategies in patients at risk of bleeding. Am J Kidney Dis. 2007 May;49(5):642-9. doi: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2007.02.001.
PubMed 17472846
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 3 Nov 2006. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Heparin-Coated Polyacrylonitrile Membrane Versus Regional Citrate Anticoagulation: a Prospective Randomised Study of 2 Anticoagulation Strategies in Patients at Risk of Bleeding
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00395824
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- pe2006-01
- Conditions
- Dialysis
- Keywords
- citrate, anticoagulation, heparin-coated membrane
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 33 participants
- Lead sponsor
- Universitaire Ziekenhuizen KU LeuvenUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- Jan 2005
- Study completion
- Sep 2005
- First posted
- 3 Nov 2006 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Hemodialysis causes contact activation of the coagulation pathway (1). For this reason, unfractionated or low molecular weight heparins are administered in daily practice to prevent thrombosis of the dialyzer and blood circuit, but the dose commonly used causes systemic anticoagulation. This can cause serious complications in patients with high risk of bleeding. Regional and low-dose heparinization, use of prostacycline, regional citrate anticoagulation (RCA), and high-flow-rate hemodialysis without anticoagulation have been shown to reduce bleeding complications. Each of these methods, however, is characterized by its own technical difficulties, limitations, or complications.
The present study aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of heparin-coated polyacrylonitrile membranes (AN69ST) and regional citrate anticoagulation in hemodialysis patients at risk of bleeding
Detailed description
- Open label single centre prospective randomized trial including 33 patients aged over 18 years with chronic kidney disease stage 5 requiring intermittent hemodialysis at the University Hospital Leuven and at risk of bleeding. Exclusion criteria were: any haemostatic disorder favouring either bleeding or clotting, anti-vitamin K or heparin treatment, heparin induced thrombocytopenia and haemodynamic instability. Written informed consent before enrolment.
- Random allocation (by sealed enveloppe) to RCA with a calcium free dialysate (RCA-Ca0), RCA with a calcium containing dialysate (RCA-Ca1,5) or to anticoagulant-free hemodiaysis with a heparin-coated polyacrylonitrile membrane (Nephral 300ST®).
- At the end of each dialysis session, arterial and venous drip chambers and the filter will be inspected for visible signs of coagulation. Corresponding to the standard care at our dialysis unit, a semi-quantitative score with a range from 0 (no signs of clotting) to 4 (complete occlusion) will be used for evaluation of the dialyzer. By definition, the drip chamber will be considered clotted when a thrombus was visible after the rinse back procedure. A fibrin ring against the wall of the drip chamber will be considered normal.
- Blood samples for assessment of prothrombin fragment F1+2 and d-dimers will be collected from the inlet blood catheter prior to hemodialysis initiation and during hemodialysis at T15, T120 and T238.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (4 listed)
- aged over 18 years
- chronic kidney disease stage 5 requiring intermittent hemodialysis
- at risk of bleeding
- written informed consent
Key exclusion criteria (4 listed)
- any haemostatic disorder favouring either bleeding or clotting
- anti-vitamin K or heparin treatment
- heparin induced thrombocytopenia
- haemodynamic instability
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| anticoagulation procedure | Procedure or surgery | – |
Primary outcome
anticoagulation efficacy as evaluated by clotting score of dialyser
anticoagulation efficacy as evaluated by occurrence of major and minor clotting events
anticoagulation efficacy as evaluated by instantaneous blood clearances
1 secondary outcome
anticoagulation efficay as evaluated by time course of coagulation parameters
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 3 Nov 2006.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 38189593Natale P, Palmer SC, Ruospo M, Longmuir H, Dodds B, Prasad R, Batt TJ, Jose MD, Strippoli GF. Anticoagulation for people receiving long-term haemodialysis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2024 Jan 8;1(1):CD011858. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011858.pub2.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 17472846Evenepoel P, Dejagere T, Verhamme P, Claes K, Kuypers D, Bammens B, Vanrenterghem Y. Heparin-coated polyacrylonitrile membrane versus regional citrate anticoagulation: a prospective randomized study of 2 anticoagulation strategies in patients at risk of bleeding. Am J Kidney Dis. 2007 May;49(5):642-9. doi: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2007.02.001.
Related trials for Dialysis
Not yet recruiting
Iodine Starch Test Use in Pleuroperitoneal Leak
Peritoneal Dialysis, Peritoneal Dialysis (PD)
RecruitingObservational study
The KidneyCARE (Community Access to Research Equity) Study
Chronic Kidney Disease, Dialysis
Recruiting
Laser Acupuncture for Fatigue in Hemodialysis Patients
ESRD (End Stage Renal Disease), Dialysis
Recruiting
Study of 3D Ultrasound for Support of Hemodialysis Cannulation
Dialysis
Recruiting
Neutrophil and Monocyte Deactivation Via the SeLective CytopheretIc Device - A Randomized Clinical Trial in Acute Kidney Injury
Acute Kidney Injury
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Pieter Evenepoel, MD, PhD principal investigator
Universitaire Ziekenhuizen KU Leuven
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 3 study testing anticoagulation procedure in people with Dialysis, run by Universitaire Ziekenhuizen KU Leuven at 1 site in Belgium.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 4 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 3 Nov 2006. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Belgium. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
anticoagulation efficacy as evaluated by clotting score of dialyser. The study lists 3 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT00395824, which also lists 2 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 3 Nov 2006.