AzTrials
AzTrials

Smoking StatusNCT00398190

Media Literacy to Prevent Adolescent Smoking

A study testing Media Literacy in people with Smoking Status, run by University of Pittsburgh at 3 sites in United States.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The purpose of this project is to determine if a 3-session anti-smoking media literacy based intervention is more effective that a standard 3-session anti-smoking media literacy intervention at changing students' intention to smoke, actual smoking behavior, attitudes and norms regarding smoking, and level of media… Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 13 to 18 yearsHealthy volunteers can take part
Conditions the study is for
Smoking Status
What is being tested?
Media Literacy
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
1,211 participants
Where
3 sitesUnited States
Study dates
Oct 2006to Jun 2009
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 13 to 18 years
  • All sexes
  • Healthy volunteers accepted
  • Child, Adult

Who may be able to join

  • High school student enrolled in health class at participating schools
  • Must be able to use computer interface for submission of data

Who cannot join

  • Child does not wish to participate
  • Parent does not wish child to participate
  • Less than 13 or more than 18 years old

Trial locations and contacts

3 sites in 1 country.

United States3 sites
  • McKeesport High School

    McKeesport, Pennsylvania, 15132

  • Carrick High School

    Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, 15210

  • Schenley High School

    Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, 15213

Other trials in United States

About this study

The purpose of this project is to determine if a 3-session anti-smoking media literacy based intervention is more effective that a standard 3-session anti-smoking media literacy intervention at changing students' intention to smoke, actual smoking behavior, attitudes and norms regarding smoking, and level of media literacy.

Read the detailed description

Cigarette smoking is the top cause of preventable death and disease in the U.S., and about 90% of those who die from smoking begin as adolescents. Because smoking-related mass media messages (such as episodes of smoking in films and advertisements) significantly increase adolescent smoking, media literacy, defined as analysis and evaluation of mass media messages, presents a promising new framework for development of innovative school-based tobacco control programs. Media literacy may be more effective than standard tobacco education among the populations that are at greatest risk for smoking, such as African-Americans and the socio-economically disadvantaged, and national organizations have called for use of media literacy to reduce smoking. However, anti-smoking media literacy programs have been neither widely implemented nor well-evaluated.

The aims of this project are to determine if a theory-driven, school-based, 3-session anti-smoking media literacy curriculum delivered to 9th grade students can affect clinically relevant factors mediating adolescent smoking according to the widely accepted Theory of Reasoned Action: intention to smoke, smoking behavior, attitude toward smoking, and norms involving smoking. It is hypothesized that, compared with those exposed to a currently accepted school-based smoking prevention program, students exposed to the media literacy program will develop more negative attitudes toward smoking, a more negative sense of smoking norms, less intention to smoke, and less smoking. We also expect that the curriculum will improve smoking media literacy scores as measured by a reliable, valid scale.

Over two years, eight high schools will be recruited to randomize all 9th grade health classrooms to receive either the 3-session media literacy anti-smoking curriculum or a currently accepted anti-smoking program of equivalent length. This recruitment will occur via two prominent community organizations responsible for anti-tobacco programming in 50 local school districts. Experienced health educators will be trained in implementation of both experimental and control curricula. Outcome measures, demographic data, and other important covariates will be collected by a questionnaire given three times: at baseline, immediately post-intervention, and after one year. Questionnaire items are reliable, valid, and pilot-tested. Process evaluation will be conducted to assess implementation fidelity, to confirm or refute the findings of the quantitative assessment, to help explain outcome data, to refine the intervention, and to inform future replications of the curriculum.

Given the substantial nationwide morbidity and mortality due to tobacco use, the role of mass media messages in adolescent initiation of smoking, and the potential power of media literacy as an agent for health behavior change, it is essential to study the utility of media literacy in altering smoking behaviors and antecedents in this age group. If media literacy programs are successful in buffering the impact of mass media on adolescent smoking, similar interventions can be developed to prevent other harmful behaviors related to mass media messages.

Conditions
Smoking Status
Being tested
Control, Media Literacy
Keywords
Smoking, Tobacco use disorder
Medical subject headings
Smoking, Tobacco Use Disorder

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • ControlBehavioural

    Standard anti-tobacco programming

  • Media LiteracyBehavioural

    Anti-smoking media literacy curriculum intervention

Study groups in NCT00398190
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
ControlActive comparatorStudents receive standard anti-tobacco education
Receives: Behavioral: Control
Media LiteracyExperimentalStudents receive media literacy based anti-smoking education
Receives: Behavioral: Media Literacy

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Susceptibility to smoking (Pierce, 1996)

    Measured: Immediate, Delayed

  2. Current smoking (last 30 days)

    Measured: Delayed (one year)

  3. Smoking media literacy

    Measured: Immediate, delayed (one year)

Secondary outcomes (4)
  1. Attitudes toward smoking

    Measured: Immediate, delayed (one year)

  2. Subjective normative beliefs involving smoking

    Measured: Immediate, delayed (one year)

  3. Implementation fidelity

    Measured: Immediate

  4. Feasibility/acceptability of program

    Measured: Immediate, delayed (one year)

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted10 Nov 2006 (estimated)
  2. Study startOct 2006
  3. Primary completionJun 2009
  4. Study completionJun 2009

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Prevention
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Single blind
Who is masked
Participant
Enrolment
1,211 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT00398190
Sponsor's protocol ID
57407
Status last verified
Jul 2017
First submitted
8 Nov 2006
Last updated
26 Jul 2017
Results posted
No

Publications

  • Primack BA, Gold MA, Land SR, Fine MJ. Association of cigarette smoking and media literacy about smoking among adolescents. J Adolesc Health. 2006 Oct;39(4):465-72. doi: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2006.05.011.

    PubMed 16982379
  • Primack BA, Gold MA, Switzer GE, Hobbs R, Land SR, Fine MJ. Development and validation of a smoking media literacy scale for adolescents. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2006 Apr;160(4):369-74. doi: 10.1001/archpedi.160.4.369.

    PubMed 16585481
  • Primack BA, Douglas EL, Land SR, Miller E, Fine MJ. Comparison of media literacy and usual education to prevent tobacco use: a cluster-randomized trial. J Sch Health. 2014 Feb;84(2):106-15. doi: 10.1111/josh.12130.

    PubMed 25099425
  • Primack BA, Fine D, Yang CK, Wickett D, Zickmund S. Adolescents' impressions of antismoking media literacy education: qualitative results from a randomized controlled trial. Health Educ Res. 2009 Aug;24(4):608-21. doi: 10.1093/her/cyn062. Epub 2008 Dec 3.

    PubMed 19052155
  • Primack BA, Hobbs R. Association of various components of media literacy and adolescent smoking. Am J Health Behav. 2009 Mar-Apr;33(2):192-201. doi: 10.5993/ajhb.33.2.8.

    PubMed 18844513

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Media Literacy in people with Smoking Status, run by University of Pittsburgh at 3 sites in United States.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 3 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 26 Jul 2017. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 3 sites in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Susceptibility to smoking (Pierce, 1996) (time frame: Immediate, Delayed). The study lists 3 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT00398190, which also lists 5 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 26 Jul 2017.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in