AzTrials
AzTrials

Metastatic Colorectal CancerPhase 3HORIZON IINCT00399035

Cediranib (AZD2171, RECENTIN™) in Addition to Chemotherapy in Patients With Untreated Metastatic Colorectal Cancer

A Phase 3 study testing Cediranib, FOLFOX (5-fluorouracil, Leucovorin, Oxaliplatin) and XELOX (Capecitabine and Oxaliplatin) in people with Metastatic Colorectal Cancer, run by AstraZeneca at 90 sites in 15 countries.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The purpose of this study is to determine if Cediranib when added to chemotherapy is more effective than chemotherapy alone in prolonging life expectancy and slowing disease progression in patients with previously untreated metastatic colorectal cancer. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 130 years
Conditions the study is for
Metastatic Colorectal Cancer
What is being tested?
Cediranib, FOLFOX (5-fluorouracil, Leucovorin, Oxaliplatin) and XELOX (Capecitabine and Oxaliplatin)
Could I receive a placebo?
Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
How many people
1,254 participants
Where
90 sitesin 15 countries
Study dates
Nov 2006to Aug 2016
Phase
Phase 3
Are there results?
Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 130 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Written Informed Consent
  • Carcinoma of the colon or rectum
  • One or more measurable lesions

Who cannot join

  • Adjuvant/neoadjuvant therapy within 6-12 months of study entry
  • Untreated unstable brain or meningeal metastases
  • Specific laboratory ranges
  • Specific cardiovascular problems
  • Participation in other trials within 30 days

Trial locations and contacts

90 sites in 15 countries.

90 sites in 15 countries

Czechia12 sites
  • Research Site

    Brno

  • Research Site

    České Budějovice

  • Research Site

    Cheb

  • Research Site

    Jičín

  • Research Site

    Jihlava

  • Research Site

    Olomouc

  • Research Site

    Ostrava

  • Research Site

    Prague

  • Research Site

    Pribram - Zdabor

  • Research Site

    Šumperk

  • Research Site

    Zlín

  • Research Site

    Znojmo

Other trials in Czechia

China11 sites
  • Research Site

    Beijing

  • Research Site

    Changchun

  • Research Site

    Chengdu

  • Research Site

    Chongqing

  • Research Site

    Fuzhou

  • Research Site

    Guangzhou

  • Research Site

    Hangzhou

  • Research Site

    Nanjing

  • Research Site

    Nanning

  • Research Site

    Shanghai

  • Research Site

    Tianjin

Other trials in China

Brazil8 sites
  • Research Site

    Curitiba

  • Research Site

    Goiânia

  • Research Site

    Jaú

  • Research Site

    Porto Alegre

  • Research Site

    Rio de Janeiro

  • Research Site

    Salvador

  • Research Site

    Santo André

  • Research Site

    São Paulo

Other trials in Brazil

Argentina7 sites
  • Research Site

    Buenos Aires

  • Research Site

    Capital Federal

  • Research Site

    Ciudad de Buenos Aires

  • Research Site

    Córdoba

  • Research Site

    Resistencia

  • Research Site

    Rosario

  • Research Site

    Santa Fe

Other trials in Argentina

Australia7 sites
  • Research Site

    Ashford

  • Research Site

    Camperdown

  • Research Site

    Heidelberg

  • Research Site

    Hornsby

  • Research Site

    Liverpool

  • Research Site

    Waratah

  • Research Site

    Wodonga

Other trials in Australia

Hungary7 sites
  • Research Site

    Budapest

  • Research Site

    Debrecen

  • Research Site

    Győr

  • Research Site

    Kecskemét

  • Research Site

    Nyíregyháza

  • Research Site

    Szombathely

  • Research Site

    Zalaegerszeg

Other trials in Hungary

Poland7 sites
  • Research Site

    Bydgoszcz

  • Research Site

    Gdansk

  • Research Site

    Gliwice

  • Research Site

    Krakow

  • Research Site

    Olsztyn

  • Research Site

    Torun

  • Research Site

    Wroclaw

Other trials in Poland

Bulgaria6 sites
  • Research Site

    Plovdiv

  • Research Site

    Sofia

  • Research Site

    Stara Zagora

  • Research Site

    Varna

  • Research Site

    Veliko Tarnovo

  • Research Site

    Vratsa

Other trials in Bulgaria

Germany6 sites
  • Research Site

    Essen

  • Research Site

    Freiburg im Breisgau

  • Research Site

    Goslar

  • Research Site

    Hamburg

  • Research Site

    Hildesheim

  • Research Site

    Mannheim

Other trials in Germany

Philippines5 sites
  • Research Site

    Cebu City

  • Research Site

    Davao City

  • Research Site

    Iloilo City

  • Research Site

    Quezon

  • Research Site

    Quezon City

Other trials in Philippines

Switzerland4 sites
  • Research Site

    Bellinzona

  • Research Site

    Lausanne

  • Research Site

    Locarno

  • Research Site

    Zurich

Other trials in Switzerland

United Kingdom4 sites
  • Research Site

    Aberdeen

  • Research Site

    Belfast

  • Research Site

    Leicester

  • Research Site

    Manchester

Other trials in United Kingdom

India2 sites
  • Research Site

    Hyderabad

  • Research Site

    Trivandrum

Other trials in India

South Korea2 sites
  • Research Site

    Goyang-si

  • Research Site

    Seoul

Other trials in South Korea

Taiwan2 sites
  • Research Site

    Tainan

  • Research Site

    Taipei

Other trials in Taiwan

About this study

Official title: A Randomised, Double-blind, Phase III Study to Compare the Efficacy and Safety of Cediranib (AZD2171, RECENTIN™) When Added to 5 Fluorouracil, Leucovorin and Oxaliplatin (FOLFOX) or Capecitabine and Oxaliplatin (XELOX) With the Efficacy and Safety of Placebo When Added to FOLFOX or XELOX in Patients With Previously Untreated Metastatic Colorectal Cancer.

The purpose of this study is to determine if Cediranib when added to chemotherapy is more effective than chemotherapy alone in prolonging life expectancy and slowing disease progression in patients with previously untreated metastatic colorectal cancer.

Being tested
Cediranib, FOLFOX (5-fluorouracil, Leucovorin, Oxaliplatin), XELOX (Capecitabine and Oxaliplatin), Cediranib Placebo
Keywords
Colorectal Cancer, Cediranib, RECENTIN
Medical subject headings
Colorectal Neoplasms

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • CediranibDrug

    Also called AZD2171, RECENTIN™

    oral tablet

  • FOLFOX (5-fluorouracil, Leucovorin, Oxaliplatin)Drug

    Also called Other Names:, 5-FU, Drug: Leucovorin (in FOLFOX), intravenous infusion

    intravenous infusion

  • XELOX (Capecitabine and Oxaliplatin)Drug

    Also called Xeloda® + Eloxatin®

    intravenous oxaliplatin 130 mg/ m^2(day 1) followed by oral capecitabine 1,000 mg/ m^2twice daily (day 1 to day 15)

  • Cediranib PlaceboDrug

    oral tablet

Study groups in NCT00399035
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
FOLFOX + placebo CediranibPlacebo comparatorFOLFOX + placebo Cediranib
Receives: Drug: FOLFOX (5-fluorouracil, Leucovorin, Oxaliplatin); Drug: Cediranib Placebo
Xelox + placebo CediranibPlacebo comparatorXelox + placebo Cediranib
Receives: Drug: XELOX (Capecitabine and Oxaliplatin); Drug: Cediranib Placebo
FOLFOX + CediranibExperimentalFOLFOX + Cediranib
Receives: Drug: Cediranib; Drug: FOLFOX (5-fluorouracil, Leucovorin, Oxaliplatin)
XELOX + CediranibExperimentalXELOX + Cediranib
Receives: Drug: Cediranib; Drug: XELOX (Capecitabine and Oxaliplatin)

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Progression-free Survival

    RECIST criteria defined as follows: Target lesions Complete Response (CR) Disappearance of all target lesions Partial Response (PR) At least a 30% decrease in the sum of LD of target lesions taking as reference the baseline sum LD.Progressive Disease (PD) At least a 20% increase in the sum of LD of target lesions taking as references the smallest sum LD recorded (either at baseline or at previous assessment since treatment began).Stable Disease (SD) Neither sufficient shrinkage to qualify for PR nor sufficient increase to qualify for PD. Non-target lesions Complete Response (CR) Disappearance of all non-target lesions Non-Complete Response (non-CR/Non- Progression [non-PD]) Persistence of one or more non-target lesion or/and maintenance of tumour marker level above the normal limits. Progression (PD) Unequivocal progression of existing nontarget lesions.

    Measured: RECIST assessed at baseline every 6 weeks through to week 24 and 12 week thereafter through to progression or data cut off date of 21/03/10 whichever was earliest.

  2. Overall Survival

    Number of months from randomisation to the date of death from any cause

    Measured: Baseline through to date of death upto and including data cut off date of 21/03/10

Secondary outcomes (5)
  1. Overall Response Rate

    Objective tumour response(defined as a confirmed response of CR or PR).The definition for a confirmed response was met when an initial RECIST response of PR/CR was confirmed at the next scheduled visit as a PR/CR according to an evaluable assessment.Intervening assessments of non-evaluable or stable disease were allowable as long as the initial RECIST response was confirmed.RECIST criteria defined as follows: Target lesions Complete Response(CR)Disappearance of all target lesions Partial Response (PR).At least a 30% decrease in the sum of LD of target lesions taking as reference the baseline sum LD. Progressive Disease (PD) At least a 20% increase in the sum of LD of target lesions taking as references the smallest sum LD recorded (either at baseline or at previous assessment since treatment began).Stable Disease (SD) Neither sufficient shrinkage to qualify for PR nor sufficient increase to qualify for PD.Non-target lesions Complete Response (CR) Disappearance of all non-target lesi

    Measured: Baseline through to date of death upto and including data cut off date of 21/03/10

  2. Best Percentage Change in Tumour Size

    Maximum percentage reduction or minimum percentage increase in tumour size where size is the sum of the longest diameters of the target lesions

    Measured: Baseline through to date of death upto and including data cut off date of 21/03/10

  3. Duration of Response

    Based on RECIST measurements taken throughout the study and best objective tumour response at the defined analysis cut-off point. Measured from the time the criteria for CR/PR are first met (whichever is recorded first) until the patient progresses or dies.

    Measured: Treatment period from initial response up until data cut-off date of 21/03/10

  4. Rate of Resection of Liver Metastases

    Number of patients undergoing liver resection, based on patients with liver disease at baseline

    Measured: Post-randomisation until end of study

  5. Time to Wound Healing Complications

    Number of days from post-randomisation surgery until wound healing complications

    Measured: Post-randomisation until end of study

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted14 Nov 2006 (estimated)
  2. Study startNov 2006
  3. Primary completionMar 2010
  4. Study completionAug 2016

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 3
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Quadruple blind
Who is masked
Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor
Enrolment
1,254 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT00399035
Sponsor's protocol ID
D8480C00051
Other IDs
EUDRACT No 2006-001194-14, HORIZON II
Acronym
HORIZON II
Status last verified
Oct 2016
First submitted
13 Nov 2006
Last updated
28 Dec 2016

Publications

  • Smith JC, Brooks L, Hoff PM, McWalter G, Dearden S, Morgan SR, Wilson D, Robertson JD, Jurgensmeier JM. KRAS mutations are associated with inferior clinical outcome in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer, but are not predictive for benefit with cediranib. Eur J Cancer. 2013 Jul;49(10):2424-32. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2013.02.023. Epub 2013 Mar 16.

    PubMed 23510802

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 3 study testing Cediranib, FOLFOX (5-fluorouracil, Leucovorin, Oxaliplatin) and XELOX (Capecitabine and Oxaliplatin) in people with Metastatic Colorectal Cancer, run by AstraZeneca at 90 sites in 15 countries.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 5 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 28 Dec 2016. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 90 sites in Czechia, China, Brazil, Argentina, Australia and 10 more countries. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this phase mean?

Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 30 Oct 2012). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Progression-free Survival (time frame: RECIST assessed at baseline every 6 weeks through to week 24 and 12 week thereafter through to progression or data cut off date of 21/03/10 whichever was earliest.). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT00399035, which also lists 1 linked publication.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 28 Dec 2016.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in