AzTrials
AzTrials

Renal TransplantPhase 2NCT00402168

A Study of BMS-224818 (Belatacept) in Patients Who Have Undergone a Kidney Transplant and Are Currently on Stable Cyclosporine or Tacrolimus Regimen With or Without Corticosteroids

A Phase 2 study testing Belatacept, Cyclosporine A and Tacrolimus in people with Renal Transplant, run by Bristol-Myers Squibb at 44 sites in 12 countries.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The purpose of this study is to learn if conversion to belatacept from cyclosporine or tacrolimus will preserve kidney function in people who have had a kidney transplant. The safety and tolerability of this treatment will also be studied Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Renal Transplant
What is being tested?
Belatacept, Cyclosporine A and Tacrolimus
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
173 participants
Where
44 sitesin 12 countries
Study dates
Jan 2007to Jun 2013
Phase
Phase 2
Are there results?
Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Men and women age 18 and older
  • 6-36 months after kidney transplant receiving cyclosporine or tacrolimus
  • calculated GFR ≥35 and ≤75mL/min/1.73 m²
  • subjects must have completed 1 year in the IM103-010ST and remained on study treatment (Long Term Extension)

Who cannot join

  • Significant infection
  • acute rejection within 3 months
  • prior graft loss due to rejection
  • pregnancy
  • positive crossmatch

Trial locations and contacts

44 sites in 12 countries.

44 sites in 12 countries

United States9 sites
  • University Of North Carolina School Of Medicine

    Chapel Hill, North Carolina, 27599-7155

  • University Of Chicago

    Chicago, Illinois, 60637

  • Pharmacy, First Call Iv

    Kenner, Louisiana, 70062

  • National Institute Of Transplantation

    Los Angeles, California, 90057

  • Medical College Of Wisconsin

    Milwaukee, Wisconsin, 53226

  • Tulane University Hospital & Clinic

    New Orleans, Louisiana, 70112

  • Mayo Clinic Hospital

    Phoenix, Arizona, 85054

  • California Institute Of Renal Research

    San Diego, California, 92123

  • Ucsf

    San Francisco, California, 94143-0106

Other trials in United States

Argentina5 sites
  • Local Institution

    Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, 1155

  • Local Institution

    Capital Federal, Buenos Aires, C1425APQ

  • Local Institution

    Córdoba, Córdoba Province, 5016

  • Local Institution

    Rosario, Santa Fe Province, 2000

  • Local Institution

    Santa Fe, Santa Fe Province, S3000EPV

Other trials in Argentina

Brazil5 sites
  • Local Institution

    Bonsucesso, Rio de Janeiro, 21041-030

  • Local Institution

    Curitiba, Paraná, 80240-000

  • Local Institution

    Porto Alegre, Rio Grande do Sul, 90020-090

  • Local Institution

    Porto Alegre, Rio Grande do Sul, 90035-003

  • Local Institution

    São Paulo, São Paulo, 01323-900

Other trials in Brazil

Mexico5 sites
  • Local Institution

    Aguascalientes, Aguascalientes, 20000

  • Local Institution

    Cuernavaca, Morelos, 62448

  • Local Institution

    Df, Mexico City, 14000

  • Local Institution

    San Luis Potosí City, Snl, 78240

  • Local Institution

    Tlalpan, C P, 14080

Other trials in Mexico

Canada4 sites
  • Local Institution

    Edmonton, Alberta, T6G 2G3

  • Local Institution

    Halifax, Nova Scotia, B3H 1V8

  • Local Institution

    Hamilton, Ontario, L8N 4A6

  • Local Institution

    Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, S7M 0Z9

Other trials in Canada

India3 sites
  • Local Institution

    Kochi, Kerala, 682304

  • Local Institution

    Nadiād, Gujarat, 387001

  • Local Institution

    Pāladi, Ahmedabad, 380007

Other trials in India

Poland3 sites
  • Local Institution

    Bydgoszcz, 85-094

  • Local Institution

    Szczecin, 70-111

  • Local Institution

    Warsaw, 02-006

Other trials in Poland

Spain3 sites
  • Local Institution

    Barcelona, 08026

  • Local Institution

    Barcelona, 08907

  • Local Institution

    Valencia, 46017

Other trials in Spain

Belgium2 sites
  • Local Institution

    Brussels, 1070

  • Local Institution

    Edegem, 2650

Other trials in Belgium

France2 sites
  • Local Institution

    Paris, Cedex 15, 75743

  • Local Institution

    Toulouse, Cedex 09

Other trials in France

Germany2 sites
  • Charite Berlin Mitte

    Berlin, 10117

  • Local Institution

    Homburg/saar, 66421

Other trials in Germany

Australia1 site
  • Local Institution

    Parkville, Victoria, 3050

Other trials in Australia

About this study

Official title: Belatacept Conversion Trial in Renal Transplantation

The purpose of this study is to learn if conversion to belatacept from cyclosporine or tacrolimus will preserve kidney function in people who have had a kidney transplant. The safety and tolerability of this treatment will also be studied

Being tested
Belatacept, Cyclosporine A, Tacrolimus

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • BelataceptDrug

    Also called BMS-224818

    IV, IV Infusion, 5 mg/kg once every 28 days for one year

  • Cyclosporine ADrug

    Tablets, Oral, Trough of 100-250 ng/mL, 2* daily for one year

  • TacrolimusDrug

    Tablets, Oral, Trough of 5-10 ng/mL, 2* daily for one year

Study groups in NCT00402168
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
A: BelataceptExperimentalNot described
Receives: Drug: Belatacept
B: calcineurin inhibitor (CNI)-based immunosuppressive regimenActive comparatorNot described
Receives: Drug: Cyclosporine A; Drug: Tacrolimus

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Mean Change From Baseline in Calculated Glomerular Filtration Rate (GFR) With Imputed Values to 12 Months Post Randomization - All Randomized Participants (Intent-to-Treat Population)

    Calculated GFR assessment used the modification of diet in renal disease (MDRD) formula. GFR was measured as mL/min/1.73 m^2. For death or graft loss participants, calculated GFR (cGFR) value 10 was used, for other participants who had a post baseline cGFR value missing, but had baseline value and at least 2 post baseline values available, which were at least 120 days apart, linear regression model was used to impute the cGFR value. Baseline = value at screening. Randomization/First Dose was on Day 1.

    Measured: Baseline to 12 months post randomization

Secondary outcomes (25)
  1. Mean Change From Baseline in Calculated Glomerular Filtration Rate (GFR) With Imputed Values to 6 Months Post Randomization - All Randomized Participants (Intent-to-Treat Population)

    Calculated GFR assessment used the modification of diet in renal disease (MDRD) formula. GFR was measured as mL/min/1.73 m^2. For death or graft loss participants, calculated GFR (cGFR) value 10 was used, for other participants who had a post baseline cGFR value missing, but had baseline value and at least 2 post baseline values available, which were at least 120 days apart, linear regression model was used to impute the cGFR value. Baseline = value at screening.

    Measured: Baseline to 6 months post randomization

  2. Number of Participants With Acute Rejection (AR) by Months 6 and 12 Post Randomization - All Randomized Participants

    AR defined: if either a or b was satisfied: a: the reason for clinical suspicion was reported to be an unexplained rise of serum creatinine ≥ 25% from baseline creatinine; or an unexplained decreased urine output; or fever and graft tenderness and the episode was a case of biopsy proven AR (AR of Banff histopathologic classification Grade IA or higher as assessed by the blinded central pathologist); b: the reason for clinical suspicion was reported to be something other than: an unexplained rise of serum creatinine ≥ 25% from baseline creatinine; or an unexplained decreased urine output; or fever and graft tenderness; the episode was a case of biopsy proven AR, and the participant was treated for this episode. Banff 97 diagnostic category for renal allograft biopsies is an international standardized histopathological classification. AR is defined by a renal biopsy demonstrating a Banff 97 classification of Grade IA or greater, with higher scores indicating more severe rejection.

    Measured: At 6 and 12 months post randomization

  3. Percentage of Participants Surviving With a Functioning Graft, Have Graft Loss or Death (Graft Loss, Death, Death With Functioning Graft) By Month 6 and Month 12 Post Randomization

    Graft loss was defined as either functional loss or physical loss. Functional loss was defined as a sustained level of serum creatinine (SCr) ≥ 6.0 mg/dL (530 μmol/L) for ≥ 4 weeks or administration of a maintenance dialysis regimen for at least 56 days or impairment of renal function to such a degree that the participant undergoes re-transplantation.

    Measured: At 6 and 12 months post randomization

  4. Number of Participants Who Had Any Study Drug Dose Alteration by Month 12 Due to Any Reason - Randomized and Treated Participants

    Reasons for study drug dose modification included categories of decline in renal function (as determined by the investigator), treatment of acute rejection, and other reasons. More than 1 reason could be given for dose alteration.

    Measured: Month 12

  5. Percentage of Participants With a Composite Endpoint of Death, Graft Loss and Acute Rejection at Month 12

    Percentage=number with composite divided by number randomized. Graft loss was functional loss or physical loss. Functional loss = sustained level of serum creatinine (SCr) ≥ 6.0 mg/dL for ≥ 4 weeks or administration of a maintenance dialysis regimen for at least 56 days or impairment of renal function to such a degree that participant undergoes re-transplantation. AR: if either a or b: (a) the reason for clinical suspicion was reported to be an unexplained rise of serum creatinine ≥ 25% from baseline; or an unexplained decreased urine output; or fever and graft tenderness and the episode was a case of biopsy-proven AR (grade IA or higher as assessed by the blinded central pathologist); (b) the reason for clinical suspicion was reported to be something other than: an unexplained rise of serum creatinine ≥ 25% from baseline; or an unexplained decreased urine output; or fever and graft tenderness; the episode was a case of biopsy-proven AR, and the participant was treated for it.

    Measured: 12 Months post randomization

  6. Percentage of Participants With New Onset Diabetes Mellitus - All Randomized Participants

    A participant who did not have diabetes prior to randomization is determined to have new onset diabetes mellitus if they received an antidiabetic medication for a duration of at least 30 days or at least two fasting plasma glucose (FPG) tests indicated that FPG is >=126 mg/dL. Percentage was the number of participants with new onset of diabetes mellitus divided by the number of participants without pre-randomization diabetes.

    Measured: Month 12 post randomization

  7. Number of Participants With Anti-Donor Human Leukocyte Antigen (HLA) Positive Antibodies

    Samples were obtained at Day 1 (first dose), Week 24, and Week 52 (or end of therapy). This was a cumulative summary in that once a participant was positive, that participant remained positive for later time points. Evaluation of anti-donor HLA antibodies was performed by an external laboratory (Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia).

    Measured: Month 6 and Month 12 Post Randomization

  8. Mean Change From Baseline to Month 6 and to Month 12 in Serum Creatinine - All Randomized Participants

    Baseline was value at screening or prior to first dose of study drug. Serum creatinine was measured in milligrams per deciliter (mg/dL). Baseline = value at screening.

    Measured: Baseline to Month 6 and Month 12 Post Randomization

  9. Number of Participants With Serious Adverse Events (SAEs), Deaths, and Discontinuation Due to Adverse Events (AEs) From First Dose up to Month 12

    AE=any new unfavorable symptom, sign, or disease or worsening of a preexisting condition that may not have a causal relationship with treatment. SAE=a medical event that at any dose results in death, persistent or significant disability/incapacity, or drug dependency/abuse; is life-threatening, an important medical event, or a congenital anomaly/birth defect; or requires or prolongs hospitalization. Treatment-related=having certain, probable, possible, or missing relationship to study drug.

    Measured: First Dose (Day 1) to Month 12

  10. Mean Change From Baseline in SF-36 Questionnaire Physical Component Score and in Mental Component Score at Month 12 - All Randomized Participants

    SF-36 was a Participant-Reported Quality of Life (QoL) Short Form (SF) questionnaire. The subscale in the mental component (MCS) part of the instrument ranged from 1 to 6 with 1=all of the time and 6= none of the time. The subscale for physical component (PCS) ranged from 1 to 3 with 1=Yes, limited a lot and 3=No, not limited at all. The subscale for the extent that physical health or emotional problems interfered with normal activities ranged from 1 to 5 with 1=not at all and 5= extremely. Baseline was at randomization or prior to first dose. Baseline = value at screening. The subscale scores were transformed using norm-based methods that standardized the scores to a mean of 50 and a standard deviation of 10 in the general population. The scores range from a minimum of 0 to a maximum of 100, with a higher score indicating better quality of life.

    Measured: Baseline, Month 12

  11. Mean Change From Baseline to Month 12 for Eight Domain Scores of Quality of Life (QoL) Instrument SF-36 - All Randomized Participants

    SF-36 was a Participant-Reported Quality of Life (QoL) Short Form (SF) questionnaire measuring health-related quality of life (HRQL) covering 8 domains of physical and mental component summaries: physical function, role limitations due to physical problems, pain, general health perception, and vitality, social function, role limitations due to emotional problems, and mental health.

    All domains were scored using norm-based methods that standardized the scores to a mean of 50 and a standard deviation of 10 in the general population. The scores range from a minimum of 0 to a maximum of 100, with a higher score indicating better quality of life.

    Measured: Baseline (screening) to Month 12

  12. Ridit Score at Month 12 - All Randomized Participants

    The Modified Transplant Symptom Occurrence and Symptom Distress Scale (MTSOSD-59R) was used to assess the occurrence (never, occasionally, regularly, almost always, always) and distress (0=no distress to 4=terrible distress) of symptoms associated with immunosuppressive therapies. Ridit (relative to an identified distribution) analysis (Fleiss JL. Statistical methods for rates and proportions. New York: John Wiley \& Sons, Inc. 1991) was used. Ridit scores were calculated at 12 months for overall symptom occurrence score and overall symptom distress. The Ridit score reflects the probability that a score observed for an individual randomly selected from a group would be higher (worse symptom) than a score observed for a randomly selected individual from the reference group. The reference group was constituted by the frequency distribution of the responses of all participants on all items at baseline. The ridit of the reference group is by definition, 0.5.

    Measured: Month 12

  13. Number of Participants Meeting Marked Laboratory Abnormality Criteria From Baseline up to Month 12 - Randomized and Treated Participants

    Upper limits of normal (ULL). Leukocytes: < 2.0*10^3 cells per microliter (c/µL); Lymphocytes (absolute): < 0.5*10^3 c/µL; bilirubin: > 3.0*ULN milligrams per deciliter (mg/dL); Potassium: < 3.0 milliequivalents per liter (meq/L) or > 6.0 meq/L; Magnesium >2.6 meq/L; Sodium: < 130 meq/L; Phosphorus: < 2.0 mg/dL; Uric Acid: > 10 mg/dL. Baseline = value at screening.

    Measured: Baseline up to Month 12

  14. Long Term Period: Mean Change From Baseline to 54 Months Post Randomization in Calculated GFR on Imputed Values at Specified Timepoints - Intent to Treat (ITT) Participants Who Entered LT Period

    ITT=participants randomized to their original treatment arm and who entered the LT period are presented. Baseline=value at screening. Calculated GFR assessment used the MDRD formula. GFR was measured as mL/min/1.73 m^2. For death or graft loss participants, calculated GFR (cGFR) value of 0 was imputed and carried forward after death or graft loss up to the end of the analysis period. Sponsor discontinued the CNI treatment arm in Year 3, and participants treated with CNI could elect to switch to belatacept. If a participant did not switch to belatacept, they were required to discontinue from the study. Therefore, efficacy results from Month 36 through Month 54 are difficult to interpret. No formal comparisons were planned between the belatacept and CNI treatment groups post Month 36, and the data up to the final database lock should be interpreted with caution.

    Measured: Baseline, Month 3, 6, 12, 18, 24, 30, 36, 42, 48, 54

  15. Long Term Period: Number of Participants With Acute Rejection (AR) - All Randomized Participants in LT Period

    AR was defined: if either a or b was satisfied: (a) the reason for clinical suspicion was reported to be an unexplained rise of serum creatinine ≥ 25% from baseline creatinine; or an unexplained decreased urine output; or fever and graft tenderness and the episode was a case of biopsy proven AR (AR of Banff histopathologic classification grade IA or higher as assessed by the blinded central pathologist); (b) the reason for clinical suspicion was reported to be something other than: an unexplained rise of serum creatinine ≥ 25% from baseline creatinine; or an unexplained decreased urine output; or fever and graft tenderness; the episode was a case of biopsy proven AR, and the participant was treated for this episode. Banff 97 working classification of kidney transplant pathology was used to categorize the severity of the AR.

    Measured: Post Month 12 up to Year 6 of the Study

  16. Long Term Period: Number of Participants Who Survived With a Functioning Graft or Survived With Pure Graft Loss or Death With Functioning Graft - ITT Participants Who Entered the LT Period

    Graft loss = either pure graft loss (participant survived to the end of the study period after graft loss) or death with functioning graft. Pure graft loss = either functional loss or physical loss. Functional loss = a sustained level of serum creatinine (SCr) ≥ 6.0 mg/dL (530 μmol/L) for ≥ 4 weeks or administration of a maintenance dialysis regimen for at least 56 days or impairment of renal function to such a degree that the participant undergoes re-transplantation. The table was designed with built-in redundancy to capture all possible combinations of death and/or graft loss, but not all lines can be summed to reach the total number surviving and the total number who die and/or lose grafts. If a participant experiences pure graft loss and dies at a later date independent of the graft loss event, they are counted only once in the cumulative tabulation of death or graft loss. Only the first event experienced by the participant counted toward the cumulative total.

    Measured: Post Months 24, 36, 48, up to Year 6 of the Study

  17. Long Term Period: Percentage of Participants With New Onset Diabetes Mellitus Up to Month 36- All Randomized Participants Who Entered LT Period

    A participant who did not have diabetes prior to randomization is determined to have new onset diabetes mellitus if they received an antidiabetic medication for a duration of at least 30 days or at least two fasting plasma glucose (FPG) tests indicated that FPG is >=126 mg/dL. Percentage was the number of participants with new onset of diabetes mellitus divided by the number of participants without pre-randomization diabetes.

    Measured: Baseline (screening) up to Month 36 post randomization

  18. Long Term Period: Number of Participants With SAEs, Death, Discontinuation Due to AEs - All Randomized Participants Who Entered the Long Term Period

    AE=any new unfavorable symptom, sign, or disease or worsening of a preexisting condition that may not have a causal relationship with treatment. SAE=a medical event that at any dose results in death, persistent or significant disability/incapacity, or drug dependency/abuse; is life-threatening, an important medical event, or a congenital anomaly/birth defect; or requires or prolongs hospitalization. Treatment-related=having certain, probable, possible, or missing relationship to study drug.

    Measured: First dose after randomization (Day 1) to 56 days post last dose, up to Year 6 of the Study

  19. Long Term Period: Number of Participants With AEs of Special Interest - All Randomized Participants Who Entered the Long Term Period

    Prospectively identified events of special interest which were a subset of all AEs, and were either SAEs or non-serious AEs, included the following categories: Serious Infections, Thrombolic/embolic events, Autoimmune Disease, Malignancy, Peri-infusional reactions (only belatacept treatment group was IV) , Acute Peri-infusional events occurring within 24 hours of injection, Pulmonary Edema and Congestive Heart Failure. AE=any new unfavorable symptom, sign, or disease or worsening of a preexisting condition that may not have a causal relationship with treatment. SAE=a medical event that at any dose results in death, persistent or significant disability/incapacity, or drug dependency/abuse; is life-threatening, an important medical event, or a congenital anomaly/birth defect; or requires or prolongs hospitalization.

    Measured: First dose after randomization (Day 1) to last dose, plus 56 days, up to Year 6 of the Study

  20. Long Term Period: Mean Change From Baseline to Month 54 in Serum Creatinine- ITT Participants Who Entered LT Period

    Baseline was value at screening. Serum creatinine was measured in mg/dL. Only participants who entered into Long Term Period were included in the analysis.

    Measured: Baseline, Months 3, 6, 12, 18, 24, 30, 36, 42, 48, 54

  21. Long Term Period: Number of Participants Meeting Marked Laboratory Abnormality Criteria - All ITT Participants Who Entered the Long Term Period

    Upper limits of normal (ULN). Hemoglobin: < 8 g/dL; Platelet count: < 50*10^9 c/L; Leukocytes: < 2.0*10^3 c/µL; Lymphocytes (absolute): < 0.5*10^3 c/µL; Neutrophils: < 1.0*10^3 c/µL; Alanine Aminotransferase (ALT): > 5.0*ULN Units per liter (U/L); bilirubin: > 3.0*ULN mg/dL; Creatinine: > 3.0*ULN mg/dL; Calcium: < 7 mg/dL; Bicarbonate: > 12.5 mg/dL; Potassium: < 3.0 meq/L or > 6.0 meq/L; Magnesium >2.6 meq/L; Sodium: < 130 meq/L; Phosphorus: < 2.0 mg/dL; Uric Acid: > 10 mg/dL.

    Measured: Baseline (Screening), up to Year 6 of the Study

  22. Long Term Period: Mean Change From Baseline to Month 54 in Systolic Blood Pressure

    Blood pressure was measured while the participant was sitting quietly for 5 minutes and was measured in millimeters of mercury (mmHg). Baseline was value at screening. Only those participants who entered long term period were evaluated.

    Measured: Baseline, Months 6, 12, 18, 24, 30, 36, 42, 48, 54

  23. Long Term Period: Mean Change From Baseline to Month 54 in Diastolic Blood Pressure

    Blood pressure was measured while the participant was sitting quietly for 5 minutes and was measured in mmHg. Baseline was value at screening. Only those participants who entered long term period were evaluated.

    Measured: Baseline, Months 6, 12, 18, 24, 30, 36, 42, 48, 54

  24. Participants Who Switched From CNI to Belatacept in Long Term Period : Mean Change in Calculated GFR Based on Imputed Values From Day of Switch to Week 96 Post Switch

    Calculated GFR assessment used the MDRD formula. GFR was measured as mL/min/1.73 m^2. For death or graft loss participants, calculated GFR (cGFR) value 10 was used, for other participants who had a post baseline cGFR value missing, but had baseline value and at least 2 post baseline values available, which were at least 120 days apart, linear regression model was used to impute the cGFR value. Day of Switch = the first belatacept infusion day.

    Measured: Day of Switch (first belatacept dose) to Week 96 Post Switch

  25. Participants Who Switched to Belatacept in Long Term Period: Number of Participants With AEs and SAEs

    AE=any new unfavorable symptom, sign, or disease or worsening of a preexisting condition that may not have a causal relationship with treatment. SAE=a medical event that at any dose results in death, persistent or significant disability/incapacity, or drug dependency/abuse; is life-threatening, an important medical event, or a congenital anomaly/birth defect; or requires or prolongs hospitalization. Day of Switch = the first belatacept infusion day.

    Measured: Day of Switch (first dose of belatacept ) to last dose plus 56 days, up to Year 6 of the Study

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted22 Nov 2006 (estimated)
  2. Study startJan 2007
  3. Primary completionJun 2009
  4. Study completionJun 2013

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 2
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
173 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT00402168
Sponsor's protocol ID
IM103-010
Other IDs
LEA29Y
Status last verified
Nov 2016
First submitted
20 Nov 2006
Last updated
5 Jan 2017
Data monitoring committee
Yes

Publications

  • Rostaing L, Massari P, Garcia VD, Mancilla-Urrea E, Nainan G, del Carmen Rial M, Steinberg S, Vincenti F, Shi R, Di Russo G, Thomas D, Grinyo J. Switching from calcineurin inhibitor-based regimens to a belatacept-based regimen in renal transplant recipients: a randomized phase II study. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2011 Feb;6(2):430-9. doi: 10.2215/CJN.05840710. Epub 2010 Nov 4.

    PubMed 21051752

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 2 study testing Belatacept, Cyclosporine A and Tacrolimus in people with Renal Transplant, run by Bristol-Myers Squibb at 44 sites in 12 countries.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 5 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 5 Jan 2017. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 44 sites in United States, Argentina, Brazil, Mexico, Canada and 7 more countries. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this phase mean?

Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 5 Jan 2017). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Mean Change From Baseline in Calculated Glomerular Filtration Rate (GFR) With Imputed Values to 12 Months Post Randomization - All Randomized Participants (Intent-to-Treat Population) (time frame: Baseline to 12 months post randomization). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT00402168, which also lists 1 linked publication.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 5 Jan 2017.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in