AzTrials
AzTrials

AsthmaNCT00402207

The Anti-Inflammatory Effect of Extrafine HFA-Beclometasone Versus HFA-Fluticasone, by Means of Inflammometry

A study testing extrafine HFA-beclomethasone and HFA-fluticasone in people with Asthma, run by Maastricht University Medical Center at 1 site in Netherlands.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record

Search all trials

Trial summary

Background Chronic inflammation in peripheral airways plays an important role in the pathophysiology of asthma. Extrafine hydrofluoroalkane (HFA) beclometasone is distinguished from other ICS because of its fine aerosol characteristics. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 78 months to 12 years
Conditions the study is for
Asthma
What is being tested?
extrafine HFA-beclomethasone and HFA-fluticasone
How many people
33 participants
Where
1 siteNetherlands
Study dates
Aug 2005to Oct 2006
Phase
Interventional

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 78 months to 12 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Child

Who may be able to join

  • age 6.5 - 12 years
  • children with mild-persistent asthma
  • treatment with inhaled corticosteroids(≤ 500 μg HFA-Flucticasone, ≤ 800 μg Budesonide, or ≤ 800 μg HFA-Beclometasone, daily)
  • allowed, but needed to be used during the entire study period;
  • short / long-acting β2-agonists
  • leukotrien receptor antagonists
  • antihistamines

Who cannot join

  • Instability of asthma during the past 3 months
  • Presence of a disease that may intervene with the results of this study
  • Active smoking
  • Mental retardation
  • Inability to perform the measurements properly

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Netherlands1 site
  • University Hospital Maastricht

    Maastricht, 6202 AZ

Other trials in Netherlands

About this study

Official title: The Anti-Inflammatory Effect of Extrafine HFA-Beclometasone Versus HFA-Fluticasone, by Means of Exhaled Nitric Oxide, Inflammatory Markers in Exhaled Breath Condensate and Conventional Parameters

Background Chronic inflammation in peripheral airways plays an important role in the pathophysiology of asthma. Extrafine hydrofluoroalkane (HFA) beclometasone is distinguished from other ICS because of its fine aerosol characteristics. As a result, there is a greater extent of deposition of extrafine HFA-beclometasone in the peripheral airways. Therefore, extrafine HFA-beclometasone may have an extra anti-inflammatory effect in children with asthma.

Aim To analyse the potential extra anti-inflammatory effect of extrafine HFA-beclometasone compared to HFA-flucticasone in children with asthma by means of alveolar nitric oxide (NO) concentration and bronchial NO flux, inflammatory markers in exhaled breath condensate (EBC), and conventional parameters.

Method In a cross-over study design of 6 months, 33 children, aged 6-12 years, with doctor diagnosed mild persistent asthma, were treated with extrafine HFA-beclometasone inhaled from an autohaler and HFA-flucticasone inhaled from a discus. Primary outcome parameters of this study were; alveolar NO concentration and bronchial NO flux. Secondary outcome parameters were inflammatory markers in EBC, lung function parameters, symptoms, presence and duration of exacerbations and adverse effects. All parameters were recorded at baseline and after each treatment period.

Conditions
Asthma
Being tested
extrafine HFA-beclomethasone, HFA-fluticasone
Keywords
asthma, non-invasive inflammometry, exhaled nitric oxide, exhaled breath condensate, paediatric, extrafine HFA-beclomethasone, HFA-fluticasone
Medical subject headings
Asthma

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • extrafine HFA-beclomethasoneDrug

  • HFA-fluticasoneDrug

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. status of airway inflammation after a 3 months treatment period

  2. alveolar and bronchial exhaled nitric oxide

Secondary outcomes (4)
  1. inflammatory markers in exhaled breath condensate

  2. lung function parameters

  3. symptoms / symptom free days

  4. adverse effects

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted22 Nov 2006 (estimated)
  2. Study startAug 2005
  3. Study completionOct 2006

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Crossover
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
33 participants
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT00402207
Sponsor's protocol ID
MEC 05-005
Status last verified
Sep 2005
First submitted
20 Nov 2006
Last updated
22 Nov 2006
Results posted
No

Free account

Keep searching with a free account

You’ve used your 3 free searches for this session. Log in or create a free AzTrials account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in