AzTrials
AzTrials

StrokePhase 2NCT00402480

Hydroxyurea to Prevent Stroke in Children With Sickle Cell Anemia and Elevated TCD Flow Velocity

A Phase 2 study testing Hydroxyurea in people with Stroke, run by Duke University at 1 site in United States.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The purpose of this study is to assess prospectively the efficacy of hydroxyurea therapy in the setting of cerebrovascular disease, manifest as conditional or abnormal transcranial doppler ultrasonography (TCD) flow velocities, in children with sickle cell anemia (SCA). Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 3 to 18 years
Conditions the study is for
Stroke
What is being tested?
Hydroxyurea
How many people
50 participants
Where
1 siteUnited States
Study dates
Apr 2003to Mar 2006
Phase
Phase 2
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 3 to 18 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Child, Adult

Who may be able to join

  • Children with Sickle Cell Anemia
  • Aged 3 to 18 years
  • Confirmed TCD velocity greater than or equal to 140cm/sec
  • Negative serum pregnancy test for subjects of childbearing potential
  • Decline transfusions (for subjects with TCD velocity greater than or equal to 200 cm/sec)

Who cannot join

None listed.

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

United States1 site
  • Duke University Medical Center

    Durham, North Carolina, 27710

Other trials in United States

About this study

Official title: Effects of Hydroxyurea on the Prevention of Primary Stroke in Children With Sickle Cell Anemia and Elevated Transcranial Doppler (TCD) Flow Velocity

The purpose of this study is to assess prospectively the efficacy of hydroxyurea therapy in the setting of cerebrovascular disease, manifest as conditional or abnormal transcranial doppler ultrasonography (TCD) flow velocities, in children with sickle cell anemia (SCA). TCD is used to measure flow velocity in intracranial arteries as a marker of increased stroke risk in children with SCA. The primary objective of this protocol is to determine whether hydroxyurea reduces elevated TCD velocity.

Read the detailed description

The purpose of this study is to assess prospectively the efficacy of hydroxyurea therapy in the setting of cerebrovascular disease, manifest as conditional or abnormal transcranial doppler ultrasonography (TCD) flow velocities, in children with sickle cell anemia (SCA). TCD is used to measure flow velocity in intracranial arteries as a marker of increased stroke risk in children with SCA. The primary objective of this protocol is to determine whether hydroxyurea reduces elevated TCD velocity.

The STOP (Stroke Prevention in Sickle Cell Anemia) trial, a multicenter, randomized, controlled trial for primary stroke demonstrated that monthly blood transfusions, when compared to observation alone, significantly reduced the risk of primary stroke for children with SCA whose TCD velocity exceeded 200 cm/sec. Despite the STOP trial's clear results, there are unresolved issues regarding TCD and stroke risk in children with SCA. First, the predictive value of an abnormal result is not compelling since less than a third of children with an abnormal TCD velocity and even fewer with conditional results will ever develop a clinical stroke. There is also discordance between TCD and MRI results. Only 40% of children with abnormal TCD velocity will have abnormalities on brain MRI (Wang, et al. J Pediatr Hematol/Oncol 2000;22(4):335-339, Pegelow, et al. Arch Neurol 2001;58:2017-2021). There are also well recognized risks of chronic blood transfusions, including iron overload and alloimmunization, and the necessary duration of transfusion protection for children with abnormal TCD velocity is unknown. Unfortunately, there are currently no therapeutic options besides blood transfusions for patients with SCA and an abnormal TCD velocity.

Erythrocyte transfusions and hydroxyurea have many similar beneficial effects in patients with SCA. Transfusions may prevent primary stroke by lowering the % HbS, by increasing the hematocrit, by improving red cell rheology, by decreasing red cell adhesion, and by lowering TCD velocity. Hydroxyurea leads to many of the same changes, thus in this protocol, we will examine whether hydroxyurea, like transfusions, can lower TCD velocity. In our patients with SCA who have been screened with TCD ultrasonography, we have observed that children who were screened while receiving hydroxyurea had lower TCD velocity measurements than those who were not on hydroxyurea. In a small number of patients with TCD velocity measurements before and after initiation of hydroxyurea for non-neurological reasons, the TCD velocity declined significantly after achieving full dose hydroxyurea therapy. The changes in TCD velocity were correlated with changes in hematocrit since hydroxyurea increases blood counts in patients with SCA. For each % increase in hematocrit, the TCD velocity increased by 6.3 cm/sec. This was similar to an abstract from the STOP trial, in which TCD flow velocity declined by 7.9 cm/sec for each increase in % hematocrit from transfusions.

Based on this preliminary data, we initiated this prospective, single-institution, pilot trial to determine whether hydroxyurea therapy lowers TCD flow velocity in children with sickle cell anemia.

Conditions
Stroke
Being tested
Hydroxyurea
Keywords
Sickle Cell Anemia with Elevated TCD flow velocity
Medical subject headings
Stroke

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • HydroxyureaDrug

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Change in TCD flow velocity

Secondary outcomes (1)
  1. Stroke

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted22 Nov 2006 (estimated)
  2. Study startApr 2003
  3. Study completionMar 2006

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 2
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Non-randomised
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
50 participants
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT00402480
Sponsor's protocol ID
4744
Status last verified
Nov 2006
First submitted
21 Nov 2006
Last updated
19 Jun 2013
Results posted
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 2 study testing Hydroxyurea in people with Stroke, run by Duke University at 1 site in United States.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 0 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 19 Jun 2013. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this phase mean?

Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Change in TCD flow velocity. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 19 Jun 2013.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in