Age-Related Macular DegenerationNCT00403884
Selective RPE Laser Treatment (SRT) for Various Macular Diseases
A study testing Selective RPE laser treatment in people with Age-Related Macular Degeneration and Diabetic Maculopathy, run by University of Regensburg at 1 site in Germany.
Trial summary
In this prospective clinical study SRT is performed with various pulse durations at 1.7µs and additionally 200ns to evaluate the different clinical effects of both laser regimens. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Age-Related Macular Degeneration, Diabetic Maculopathy, Central Serous Chorioretinopathy
- What is being tested?
- Selective RPE laser treatment
- Type of treatment
- Surgery or procedure
- How many people
- 60 participants
- Where
- 1 siteGermany
- Study dates
- Oct 2004to Aug 2010
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- symmetric drusen maculopathy with soft drusen both eyes
- symmetric geographic atrophy both eyes
- diabetic macular edema single eye
- acute or chronic central serous chorioretinopathy
Who cannot join
- previous laser treatment
- previous intravitreal injections
- choroidal neovascularization
- visual acuity > 0.1
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
In this prospective clinical study SRT is performed with various pulse durations at 1.7µs and additionally 200ns to evaluate the different clinical effects of both laser regimens. The macular diseases to be treated are drusen maculopathy and geographic atrophy due to age-related macular degeneration as well as diabetic macular edema and central serous chorioretinopathy.
The beneficial effect in laser treatment is thought to be associated with the restoration of a new barrier of retinal pigment epithelium cells. If this theory is true, the destruction of the photoreceptors causing visual field defects would be only an unwanted and unnecessary side effect. Thus, SRT is able to avoid these unintentional side effects and to achieve the benefit by just treating the RPE.
In this study the clinical effect of SRT for these diseases is evaluated on a long-term basis.
Read the detailed description
Conventional laser photocoagulation has been shown to be beneficial in a variety of retinal diseases like age related macular degeneration (AMD), diabetic maculopathy (DMP), diabetic retinopathy (DRP) or central serous retinopathy (CSR). There are several hints that the positive effect is mediated by the RPE. The RPE is the main target of laser energy due to its high amount of melanosomes and absorbs about 50 to 60 % of the energy applied to the retina. Today conventional retinal laser treatment is performed using the continuous-wave argon laser (514 nm). Generally the exposure times are longer than 50 ms, typically 100 to 200ms. After application of the laser energy onto the retina usually an ophthalmoscopically visible grayish-white lesion results from thermal heat conduction. Histologically a destruction of the RPE, which is the primary absorption site, occurs, leading to an irreversible destruction of the outer and inner segments of the neuroretina due to thermal denaturation.
The effect of laser treatment to the fundus was studied by several groups. In vivo it could be observed that argon laser photocoagulation of the monkey- and human fundus causes necrosis of the RPE and a detachment of the RPE from Bruch´s membrane, budding of individual RPE cells and a multilayered RPE formation in the area of laser irradiation by seven days after treatment. Histologic sections revealed that by irradiating the RPE with a conventional argon laser the whole area of the cells is destroyed and the choriocapillaris as well as the vessels of the choroid are damaged. After laser photocoagulation RPE cells migrate and proliferate to cover the defect. In vivo after mild coagulations as usually performed in macular coagulation the RPE barrier gets intact again.
Several macular diseases are thought to be caused only by a reduced function of the RPE cells. Therefore a method for the selective destruction of the RPE cells without causing adverse effects to choroid and neuroretina, especially to the photoreceptors, seems to be an appropriate treatment (SRT). The selective effect on RPE cells, which absorb about 50% of the incident light due to their high melanosome content has been demonstrated using 5 µs argon laser pulses at 514nm with a repetition rate of 500 Hz. By irradiating the fundus with a train of µs laser pulses it was possible to achieve high peak temperatures around the melanosomes. This led to a destruction of the RPE, but only a low sublethal temperature increase in adjacent tissue structures. This selective destruction of the RPE cells sparing the photoreceptors without causing laser scotoma has been proven by histologic examinations at different times after treatment. The first clinical trial using a Nd:YLF laser system with a pulse duration of 1,7µs (100 pulses, 100 and 500 Hz) also proved the concept of selective RPE destruction and demonstrated the clinical potential of this technique. However, one of the problems concerning selective RPE laser destruction is the inability to visualize the laser lesions. Therefore it is necessary to perform fluorescein angiography after treatment to confirm the laser success and to make sure that sufficient energy was used. Since dosimetry of such laser lesions is not known, test lesions with various energy and numbers of pulses in non-significant areas of the macula - usually at the lower vessel arcade - have to be applied to elucidate the energy levels required for treatment. If the RPE is damaged, or the tight junctions of the RPE barrier are broken, fluorescein from angiography can pool from the choriocapillaris into the subretinal space. Thus fluorescein angiography has been used to detect a break of the RPE barrier. However, fluorescein angiography is an invasive method and has as already described a potential risk for allergic reactions because of the intravenous injection of the fluorescein dye.
The damage mechanism in SRT is more a thermo-mechanical one than a purely thermal one as in conventional laser treatment due to the short-duration laser pulses in the microsecond-regime. Thus, microbubble formation around the melanosomes inside the RPE cell occurs during treatment, probably leading to disruption of the cell; this is in contrast to thermal denaturation in conventional laser photocoagulation. The formation of microbubbles around the strong absorbing melanosomes inside the RPE has been proofed as damage mechanism during irradiation of the RPE with µs laser pulses. If energy is absorbed and converted to heat the thermoelastic expansion of the absorbing medium will generate an opto-acoustic (OA) transient. During irradiation of RPE with µs laser pulses a classical thermoelastic transient will be emitted. Due to the formation and collapse of microbubbles around the melanosomes during a successful SRT treatment, additional OA bubble transients will be emitted. This is analogous to the emission of acoustic transients during formation and collapse of cavitation bubbles. An OA based on-line dosimetry system can differentiate between a pure thermoelastic transient in a subthreshold irradiation and OA bubble transients superimposed to the pure thermoelastic transients in case of a successful treatment irradiation. Thus, SRT can clinically be guided by this specific OA detection system.
In this prospective clinical study SRT is performed with various pulse durations at 1.7µs and additionally 200ns to evaluate the different clinical effects of both laser regimens, which were already determined to be safe in animal experiments. The macular diseases to be treated are drusen maculopathy and geographic atrophy due to age-related macular degeneration as well as diabetic macular edema and central serous chorioretinopathy.
The beneficial effect in laser treatment of diabetic macular edema is thought to be associated with the restoration of a new barrier of retinal pigment epithelium cells. A similar effect is postulated in the treatment of drusen, central serous retinopathy and macular edema after vein occlusion. If these latter theories are true, the destruction of the photoreceptors causing visual field defects would be only an unwanted and unnecessary side effect. Thus, SRT is able to avoid these unintentional side effects and to achieve the benefit by just treating the RPE.
In this study the clinical effect of SRT for these diseases is evaluated on a long-term basis. For diabetic macular edema previously non-treated eyes with focal or diffuse macular edema are randomized to SRT or conventional treatment. Best corrected visual acuity has to be at least 0.1 and no central ischemia must be present. The endpoint is visual acuity and reduction of edema as determined by fundus photography, angiography and optical coherence tomography. Regarding central serous chorioretinopathy visual acuity decay should last longer than 2 months with angiographically seen leakage outside the fovea. Endpoint is visual acuity and reduction of subretinal edema as determined by optical coherence tomography. Regarding AMD drusen maculopathy has to show soft confluent drusen and hyperpigmented spots. Angiographically a choroidal neovascularization has to be ruled out. Both eyes of the patient must have symmetric patterns since one eye is treated and the other one observed. End point would be a visual acuity and reduction of drusen as determined by fundus photography. For geographic atrophy due to age-related macular degeneration both eyes of the patient should present symmetric areas of atrophy. Laser treatment takes place at the rim of the atrophy zone in one eye whereas the other eye is observed. Due to RPE proliferation induced by SRT the major endpoint for this entity will be the stop or reduction of geographic atrophy enlargement in the treated eye compared with the fellow eye. Visual acuity should be at least 0.1.
All patients will be followed at various times after treatment as derived from a strict inclusion and follow-up protocol. The study is approved by the institutional study board and ethical committee; patients safety is covered by a private insurance company.
- Being tested
- Selective RPE laser treatment
- Keywords
- Drusen, Geographic atrophy, diabetes, macular edema, laser, retinal pigment epithelium
- Medical subject headings
- Macular Degeneration, Central Serous Chorioretinopathy, Geographic Atrophy, Diabetes Mellitus, Macular Edema
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Selective RPE laser treatmentProcedure or surgery
Also called SRT vario, Medical Laser Center, Luebeck, Germany
interventional SRT laser treatment
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Visual acuity
Measured: up to 2 years
Secondary outcomes (3)
drusen reduction
Measured: up to 2 years
area of geographic atrophy
Measured: up to 2 years
reduction of retinal edema
Measured: up to 2 years
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted27 Nov 2006 (estimated)
- Study startOct 2004
- Primary completionDec 2009 (estimated)
- Study completionAug 2010 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Age-Related Macular DegenerationStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Non-randomised
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- Single blind
- Who is masked
- Investigator
- Enrolment
- 60 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- University of Regensburg
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Dr. Werner Jackstaedt Foundation
- Investigators
- Carsten Framme, MD, Principal investigator, University Eye Hospital Regensburg
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00403884
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- University Eye Hospital SRT
- Status last verified
- Nov 2006
- First submitted
- 24 Nov 2006
- Last updated
- 13 Jan 2010
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 13 Jan 2010. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Selective RPE Laser Treatment (SRT) for Various Macular Diseases
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00403884
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- University Eye Hospital SRT
- Keywords
- Drusen, Geographic atrophy, diabetes, macular edema, laser, retinal pigment epithelium
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Unknown status
- Enrolment
- 60 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- University of RegensburgUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Dr. Werner Jackstaedt Foundation
- Study start
- Oct 2004
- Primary completion
- Dec 2009 (estimated)
- Study completion
- Aug 2010 (estimated)
- First posted
- 27 Nov 2006 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
In this prospective clinical study SRT is performed with various pulse durations at 1.7µs and additionally 200ns to evaluate the different clinical effects of both laser regimens. The macular diseases to be treated are drusen maculopathy and geographic atrophy due to age-related macular degeneration as well as diabetic macular edema and central serous chorioretinopathy.
The beneficial effect in laser treatment is thought to be associated with the restoration of a new barrier of retinal pigment epithelium cells. If this theory is true, the destruction of the photoreceptors causing visual field defects would be only an unwanted and unnecessary side effect. Thus, SRT is able to avoid these unintentional side effects and to achieve the benefit by just treating the RPE.
In this study the clinical effect of SRT for these diseases is evaluated on a long-term basis.
Detailed description
Conventional laser photocoagulation has been shown to be beneficial in a variety of retinal diseases like age related macular degeneration (AMD), diabetic maculopathy (DMP), diabetic retinopathy (DRP) or central serous retinopathy (CSR). There are several hints that the positive effect is mediated by the RPE. The RPE is the main target of laser energy due to its high amount of melanosomes and absorbs about 50 to 60 % of the energy applied to the retina. Today conventional retinal laser treatment is performed using the continuous-wave argon laser (514 nm). Generally the exposure times are longer than 50 ms, typically 100 to 200ms. After application of the laser energy onto the retina usually an ophthalmoscopically visible grayish-white lesion results from thermal heat conduction. Histologically a destruction of the RPE, which is the primary absorption site, occurs, leading to an irreversible destruction of the outer and inner segments of the neuroretina due to thermal denaturation.
The effect of laser treatment to the fundus was studied by several groups. In vivo it could be observed that argon laser photocoagulation of the monkey- and human fundus causes necrosis of the RPE and a detachment of the RPE from Bruch´s membrane, budding of individual RPE cells and a multilayered RPE formation in the area of laser irradiation by seven days after treatment. Histologic sections revealed that by irradiating the RPE with a conventional argon laser the whole area of the cells is destroyed and the choriocapillaris as well as the vessels of the choroid are damaged. After laser photocoagulation RPE cells migrate and proliferate to cover the defect. In vivo after mild coagulations as usually performed in macular coagulation the RPE barrier gets intact again.
Several macular diseases are thought to be caused only by a reduced function of the RPE cells. Therefore a method for the selective destruction of the RPE cells without causing adverse effects to choroid and neuroretina, especially to the photoreceptors, seems to be an appropriate treatment (SRT). The selective effect on RPE cells, which absorb about 50% of the incident light due to their high melanosome content has been demonstrated using 5 µs argon laser pulses at 514nm with a repetition rate of 500 Hz. By irradiating the fundus with a train of µs laser pulses it was possible to achieve high peak temperatures around the melanosomes. This led to a destruction of the RPE, but only a low sublethal temperature increase in adjacent tissue structures. This selective destruction of the RPE cells sparing the photoreceptors without causing laser scotoma has been proven by histologic examinations at different times after treatment. The first clinical trial using a Nd:YLF laser system with a pulse duration of 1,7µs (100 pulses, 100 and 500 Hz) also proved the concept of selective RPE destruction and demonstrated the clinical potential of this technique. However, one of the problems concerning selective RPE laser destruction is the inability to visualize the laser lesions. Therefore it is necessary to perform fluorescein angiography after treatment to confirm the laser success and to make sure that sufficient energy was used. Since dosimetry of such laser lesions is not known, test lesions with various energy and numbers of pulses in non-significant areas of the macula - usually at the lower vessel arcade - have to be applied to elucidate the energy levels required for treatment. If the RPE is damaged, or the tight junctions of the RPE barrier are broken, fluorescein from angiography can pool from the choriocapillaris into the subretinal space. Thus fluorescein angiography has been used to detect a break of the RPE barrier. However, fluorescein angiography is an invasive method and has as already described a potential risk for allergic reactions because of the intravenous injection of the fluorescein dye.
The damage mechanism in SRT is more a thermo-mechanical one than a purely thermal one as in conventional laser treatment due to the short-duration laser pulses in the microsecond-regime. Thus, microbubble formation around the melanosomes inside the RPE cell occurs during treatment, probably leading to disruption of the cell; this is in contrast to thermal denaturation in conventional laser photocoagulation. The formation of microbubbles around the strong absorbing melanosomes inside the RPE has been proofed as damage mechanism during irradiation of the RPE with µs laser pulses. If energy is absorbed and converted to heat the thermoelastic expansion of the absorbing medium will generate an opto-acoustic (OA) transient. During irradiation of RPE with µs laser pulses a classical thermoelastic transient will be emitted. Due to the formation and collapse of microbubbles around the melanosomes during a successful SRT treatment, additional OA bubble transients will be emitted. This is analogous to the emission of acoustic transients during formation and collapse of cavitation bubbles. An OA based on-line dosimetry system can differentiate between a pure thermoelastic transient in a subthreshold irradiation and OA bubble transients superimposed to the pure thermoelastic transients in case of a successful treatment irradiation. Thus, SRT can clinically be guided by this specific OA detection system.
In this prospective clinical study SRT is performed with various pulse durations at 1.7µs and additionally 200ns to evaluate the different clinical effects of both laser regimens, which were already determined to be safe in animal experiments. The macular diseases to be treated are drusen maculopathy and geographic atrophy due to age-related macular degeneration as well as diabetic macular edema and central serous chorioretinopathy.
The beneficial effect in laser treatment of diabetic macular edema is thought to be associated with the restoration of a new barrier of retinal pigment epithelium cells. A similar effect is postulated in the treatment of drusen, central serous retinopathy and macular edema after vein occlusion. If these latter theories are true, the destruction of the photoreceptors causing visual field defects would be only an unwanted and unnecessary side effect. Thus, SRT is able to avoid these unintentional side effects and to achieve the benefit by just treating the RPE.
In this study the clinical effect of SRT for these diseases is evaluated on a long-term basis. For diabetic macular edema previously non-treated eyes with focal or diffuse macular edema are randomized to SRT or conventional treatment. Best corrected visual acuity has to be at least 0.1 and no central ischemia must be present. The endpoint is visual acuity and reduction of edema as determined by fundus photography, angiography and optical coherence tomography. Regarding central serous chorioretinopathy visual acuity decay should last longer than 2 months with angiographically seen leakage outside the fovea. Endpoint is visual acuity and reduction of subretinal edema as determined by optical coherence tomography. Regarding AMD drusen maculopathy has to show soft confluent drusen and hyperpigmented spots. Angiographically a choroidal neovascularization has to be ruled out. Both eyes of the patient must have symmetric patterns since one eye is treated and the other one observed. End point would be a visual acuity and reduction of drusen as determined by fundus photography. For geographic atrophy due to age-related macular degeneration both eyes of the patient should present symmetric areas of atrophy. Laser treatment takes place at the rim of the atrophy zone in one eye whereas the other eye is observed. Due to RPE proliferation induced by SRT the major endpoint for this entity will be the stop or reduction of geographic atrophy enlargement in the treated eye compared with the fellow eye. Visual acuity should be at least 0.1.
All patients will be followed at various times after treatment as derived from a strict inclusion and follow-up protocol. The study is approved by the institutional study board and ethical committee; patients safety is covered by a private insurance company.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Non-randomised
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- Single blind (investigator)
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (4 listed)
- symmetric drusen maculopathy with soft drusen both eyes
- symmetric geographic atrophy both eyes
- diabetic macular edema single eye
- acute or chronic central serous chorioretinopathy
Key exclusion criteria (4 listed)
- previous laser treatment
- previous intravitreal injections
- choroidal neovascularization
- visual acuity > 0.1
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Selective RPE laser treatmentAlso: SRT vario, Medical Laser Center, Luebeck, Germanyinterventional SRT laser treatment | Procedure or surgery | – |
Primary outcome
Visual acuity
Time frame: up to 2 years
3 secondary outcomes
drusen reduction
Time frame: up to 2 years
area of geographic atrophy
Time frame: up to 2 years
reduction of retinal edema
Time frame: up to 2 years
Results and safety
Results are not available in the source record.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 13 Jan 2010.
Related trials for Age-Related Macular Degeneration
RecruitingPhase 3
A Study of 36-Week Refill Exchanges of Port Delivery System (PDS) With Ranibizumab in nAMD
Neovascular Age-related Macular Degeneration
RecruitingObservational study
Pivotal Trial of an Automated AI-based System for Early Diagnosis and Prediction of Late Age-related Macular Degeneration
Age-related Macular Degeneration (AMD)
Active, not recruitingObservational study
Real World Evidence in China: Faricimab Use in Diabetic Macular Edema, Retinal Vein Occlusion, and Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration (The Farseeing Study)
Diabetic Macular Edema, Neovascular Age-related Macular Degeneration
Active, not recruitingObservational study
Retinal Pigment Epithelium Safety Study For Patients In B4711001
Age Related Macular Degeneration
RecruitingObservational study
National Ophthalmic Genotyping and Phenotyping Network (eyeGENE (Registered Trademark)), Stage 3 - Expansion of DNA and Data Repositories for Rare Inherited Ophthalmic Diseases
Inherited Ophthalmic Diseases, Hypopigmentation Disorder
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Carsten Framme, MD principal investigator
University Eye Hospital Regensburg
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Selective RPE laser treatment in people with Age-Related Macular Degeneration and Diabetic Maculopathy, run by University of Regensburg at 1 site in Germany.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 4 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 13 Jan 2010. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Germany. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
Results are not available in the source record.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Visual acuity (time frame: up to 2 years). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 13 Jan 2010.